Join of two graphs admits a nowhere-zero 3-flow

Let G be a graph, and λ the smallest integer for which G has a nowherezero λ-flow, i.e., an integer λ for which G admits a nowhere-zero λ-flow, but it does not admit a (λ ? 1)-flow. We denote the minimum flow number of G by Λ(G). In this paper we show that if G and H are two arbitrary graphs and G has no isolated vertex, then Λ(G ∨ H) ? 3 except two cases: (i) One of the graphs G and H is K ₂ and the other is 1-regular. (ii) H = K ₁ and G is a graph with at least one isolated vertex or a component whose every block is an odd cycle. Among other results, we prove that for every two graphs G and H with at least 4 vertices, Λ(G ∨ H) ? 3.     

Finite common coverings of pairs of regular graphs

The graph G is a covering of the graph H if there exists a (projection) map p from the vertex set of G to the vertex set of H which induces a one-to-one correspondence between the vertices adjacent to v in G and the vertices adjacent to p(v) in H, for every vertex v of G. We show that for any two finite regular graphs G and H of the same degree, there exists a finite graph K that is simultaneously a covering both of G and H. The proof uses only Hall's theorem on 1-factors in regular bipartite graphs.     

Characterizations of 2-variegated graphs and of 3-variegated graphs

A graph is said to be k-variegated if its vertex set can be partitioned into k equal parts such that each vertex is adjacent to exactly one vertex from every other part not containing it. We prove that a graph G on 2n vertices is 2-variegated if and only if there exists a set S of n independent edges in G such that no cycle in G contains an odd number of edges from S. We also characterize 3-variegated graphs.     

Total domination critical and stable graphs upon edge removal

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. A graph is total domination edge critical if the removal of any arbitrary edge increases the total domination number. On the other hand, a graph is total domination edge stable if the removal of any arbitrary edge has no effect on the total domination number. In this paper, we characterize total domination edge critical graphs. We also investigate various properties of total domination edge stable graphs.     

Path factors and parallel knock-out schemes of almost claw-free graphs

An H₁,{H₂}-factor of a graph G is a spanning subgraph of G with exactly one component isomorphic to the graph H₁ and all other components (if there are any) isomorphic to the graph H₂. We completely characterise the class of connected almost claw-free graphs that have a P₇,{P₂}-factor, where P₇ and P₂ denote the paths on seven and two vertices, respectively. We apply this result to parallel knock-out schemes for almost claw-free graphs. These schemes proceed in rounds in each of which each surviving vertex eliminates one of its surviving neighbours. A graph is reducible if such a scheme eliminates every vertex in the graph. Using our characterisation, we are able to classify all reducible almost claw-free graphs, and we can show that every reducible almost claw-free graph is reducible in at most two rounds. This leads to a quadratic time algorithm for determining if an almost claw-free graph is reducible (which is a generalisation and improvement upon the previous strongest result that showed that there was a O(n^5.376) time algorithm for claw-free graphs on n vertices).     

Graphs with 1-Hamiltonian-connected cubes

The cube G³ of a connected graph G is that graph having the same vertex set as G and in which two distinct vertices are adjacent if and only if their distance in G is at most three. A Hamiltonian-connected graph has the property that every two distinct vertices are joined by a Hamiltonian path. A graph G is 1-Hamiltonian-connected if, for every vertex w of G, the graphs G and G?w are Hamiltonian-connected. A characterization of graphs whose cubes are 1-Hamiltonian-connected is presented.     

Partitioning 2-edge-colored graphs by monochromatic paths and cycles

We present results on partitioning the vertices of 2-edge-colored graphs into monochromatic paths and cycles. We prove asymptotically the two-color case of a conjecture of Sárközy: the vertex set of every 2-edge-colored graph can be partitioned into at most 2α(G) monochromatic cycles, where α(G) denotes the independence number of G. Another direction, emerged recently from a conjecture of Schelp, is to consider colorings of graphs with given minimum degree. We prove that apart from o(|V (G)|) vertices, the vertex set of any 2-edge-colored graph G with minimum degree at least \(\tfrac{{(1 + \varepsilon )3|V(G)|}} {4}\) can be covered by the vertices of two vertex disjoint monochromatic cycles of distinct colors. Finally, under the assumption that \(\bar G\) does not contain a fixed bipartite graph H, we show that in every 2-edge-coloring of G, |V (G)| ? c(H) vertices can be covered by two vertex disjoint paths of different colors, where c(H) is a constant depending only on H. In particular, we prove that c(C ₄)=1, which is best possible.     

On a conjecture of Meyniel

A graph G is said to be very strongly perfect if for each induced subgraph H of G, each vertex of H belongs to a stable set that meets all maximal cliques of H. Meyniel proved that a graph is perfect if each of its odd cycles with at least five vertices contains at least two chords. Nowadays, such a graph is called a Meyniel graph. We prove that, as conjectured by Meyniel, a graph is very strongly perfect if and only if it is a Meyniel graph. We also design a polynomial-time algorithm which, given a Meyniel graph G and a vertex x of G, finds a stable set that contains x and meets all maximal cliques of G. We shall convert this algorithm into another polynomial-time algorithm which, given a Meyniel graph G, finds an optimal coloring of G, and a largest clique of G. Finally, we shall establish another property, related to perfection, of Meyniel graphs.     

Graphoidal bipartite graphs

A graphoidal cover of a graph G is a collection ψ of (not necessarily open) paths inG such that every path in ψ has at least two vertices, every vertex ofG is an internal vertex of at most one path in ψ and every edge of G is in exactly one path in ψ. Let Ω (ψ) denote the intersection graph of ψ. A graph G is said to be graphoidal if there exists a graphH and a graphoidal cover ψof H such that G is isomorphic to Ω(ψ). In this paper we study the properties of graphoidal graphs and obtain a forbidden subgraph characterisation of bipartite graphoidal graphs.     

Graham’s pebbling conjecture on product of thorn graphs of complete graphs

The pebbling number of a graph G, f(G), is the least n such that, no matter how n pebbles are placed on the vertices of G, we can move a pebble to any vertex by a sequence of pebbling moves, each move taking two pebbles off one vertex and placing one on an adjacent vertex. Let p₁,p₂,…,p_n be positive integers and G be such a graph, V(G)=n. The thorn graph of the graph G, with parameters p₁,p₂,…,p_n, is obtained by attaching p_i new vertices of degree 1 to the vertex u_i of the graph G, i=1,2,…,n. Graham conjectured that for any connected graphs G and H, f(G×H)≤f(G)f(H). We show that Graham’s conjecture holds true for a thorn graph of the complete graph with every by a graph with the two-pebbling property. As a corollary, Graham’s conjecture holds when G and H are the thorn graphs of the complete graphs with every .     

A survey of stratified domination in graphs

A graph G is 2-stratified if its vertex set is partitioned into two nonempty classes (each of which is a stratum or a color class). We color the vertices in one color class red and the other color class blue. Let F be a 2-stratified graph with one fixed blue vertex v specified. We say that F is rooted at v. The F-domination number of a graph G is the minimum number of red vertices of G in a red-blue coloring of the vertices of G such that for every blue vertex v of G, there is a copy of F in G rooted at v. In this paper, we survey recent results on the F-domination number for various 2-stratified graphs F.     

Total domination stable graphs upon edge addition

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. A graph is total domination edge addition stable if the addition of an arbitrary edge has no effect on the total domination number. In this paper, we characterize total domination edge addition stable graphs. We determine a sharp upper bound on the total domination number of total domination edge addition stable graphs, and we determine which combinations of order and total domination number are attainable. We finish this work with an investigation of claw-free total domination edge addition stable graphs.     

On σ-equivalence and χ-equivalence of graphs

We define a partial ordering on the set of σ-polynomials as well as a vertex splitting operation on the set of graphs, and introduce the notions of σ-equivalence and σ-uniqueness of graphs. Let σ(G) be the σ-polynomial of a graph G and (OVERBAR)σ(G) = σ(G^c). Let H = (G, v, A, B) be a vertex splitting graph of G. We prove that (OVERBAR)σ(G) ≤ (OVERBAR)σ(H) and the equality holds if and only if every vertex of A is adjacent to every vertex of B. This gives us an effective means to find σ-equivalent and χ-equivalent graphs. A necessary and sufficient condition for a graph to be χ-unique but not σ-unique is also obtained. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

A characterization of well-covered graphs that contain neither 4- nor 5-cycles

A graph is well covered if every maximal independent set has the same cardinality. A vertex x, in a well-covered graph G, is called extendable if G – {x} is well covered and β(G) = β(G – {x}). If G is a connected, well-covered graph containing no 4- nor 5-cycles as subgraphs and G contains an extendable vertex, then G is the disjoint union of edges and triangles together with a restricted set of edges joining extendable vertices. There are only 3 other connected, well-covered graphs of this type that do not contain an extendable vertex. Moreover, all these graphs can be recognized in polynomial time.     

Total domination dot-stable graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. Two vertices of G are said to be dotted (identified) if they are combined to form one vertex whose open neighborhood is the union of their neighborhoods minus themselves. We note that dotting any pair of vertices cannot increase the total domination number. Further we show it can decrease the total domination number by at most 2. A graph is total domination dot-stable if dotting any pair of adjacent vertices leaves the total domination number unchanged. We characterize the total domination dot-stable graphs and give a sharp upper bound on their total domination number. We also characterize the graphs attaining this bound.     

Geodeticity of the contour of chordal graphs

A vertex v is a boundary vertex of a connected graph G if there exists a vertex u such that no neighbor of v is further away from u than v. Moreover, if no vertex in the whole graph V(G) is further away from u than v, then v is called an eccentric vertex of G. A vertex v belongs to the contour of G if no neighbor of v has an eccentricity greater than the eccentricity of v. Furthermore, if no vertex in the whole graph V(G) has an eccentricity greater than the eccentricity of v, then v is called a peripheral vertex of G. This paper is devoted to study these kinds of vertices for the family of chordal graphs. Our main contributions are, firstly, obtaining a realization theorem involving the cardinalities of the periphery, the contour, the eccentric subgraph and the boundary, and secondly, proving both that the contour of every chordal graph is geodetic and that this statement is not true for every perfect graph.     

Some properties of edge intersection graphs of single bend paths on a grid

We consider the family of intersection graphs G of paths on a grid, where every vertex v in G corresponds to a single bend path P_v on a grid, and two vertices are adjacent in G if and only if the corresponding paths share an edge on the grid. We first show that these graphs have the Erdös-Hajnal property. Then we present some properties concerning the neighborhood of a vertex in these graphs, and finally we consider some subclasses of chordal graphs for which we give necessary and sufficient conditions to be edge intersection graphs of single bend paths in a grid.     

On realizations of point determining graphs, and obstructions to full homomorphisms

A graph is point determining if distinct vertices have distinct neighbourhoods. A realization of a point determining graph H is a point determining graph G such that each vertex-removed subgraph G-x which is point determining, is isomorphic to H. We study the fine structure of point determining graphs, and conclude that every point determining graph has at most two realizations.A full homomorphism of a graph G to a graph H is a vertex mapping f such that for distinct vertices u and v of G, we have uv an edge of G if and only if f(u)f(v) is an edge of H. For a fixed graph H, a full H-colouring of G is a full homomorphism of G to H. A minimal H-obstruction is a graph G which does not admit a full H-colouring, such that each proper induced subgraph of G admits a full H-colouring. We analyse minimal H-obstructions using our results on point determining graphs. We connect the two problems by proving that if H has k vertices, then a graph with k+1 vertices is a minimal H-obstruction if and only if it is a realization of H. We conclude that every minimal H-obstruction has at most k+1 vertices, and there are at most two minimal H-obstructions with k+1 vertices.We also consider full homomorphisms to graphs H in which loops are allowed. If H has ? loops and k vertices without loops, then every minimal H-obstruction has at most (k+1)(?+1) vertices, and, when both k and ? are positive, there is at most one minimal H-obstruction with (k+1)(?+1) vertices.In particular, this yields a finite forbidden subgraph characterization of full H-colourability, for any graph H with loops allowed.     

On large light graphs in families of polyhedral graphs

A graph H is said to be light in a family H of graphs if each graph G∈H containing a subgraph isomorphic to H contains also an isomorphic copy of H such that each its vertex has the degree (in G) bounded above by a finite number φ(H,H) depending only on H and H. We prove that in the family of all 3-connected plane graphs of minimum degree 5 (or minimum face size 5, respectively), the paths with certain small graphs attached to one of its ends are light.     

Two-factors in orientated graphs with forbidden transitions

The instance of the problem of finding 2-factors in an orientated graph with forbidden transitions consists of an orientated graph G and for each vertex v of G, a graph H_v of allowed transitions at v. Vertices of the graph H_v are the edges incident to v. An orientated 2-factor F of G is called legal if all the transitions are allowed, i.e. for every vertex v, the two edges of F adjacent to it form an edge in H_v. Deciding whether a legal 2-factor exists in G is NP-complete in general. We investigate the case when the graphs of allowed transitions are taken from some fixed class C. We provide an exact characterization of classes C so that the problem is NP-complete. In particular, we prove a dichotomy for this problem, i.e. that for any class C it is either polynomial or NP-complete.