Beliefs and Attitudes Toward Mathematics Among Third- and Fifth-Grade Students: A Descriptive Study

A survey on attitudes toward mathematics of third- and fifth-grade students enrolled in a large urban school district was conducted in the spring of 1994 as part of a review of the mathematics program. Student responses to survey items were analyzed with respect to gender and grade level. Although girls and boys were equally likely to indicate that they like mathematics, in both Grades 3 and 5, boys were more likely than girls to report being good at mathematics. This result has often been reported for older students but has rarely been explored in younger children. Some gender and grade differences were observed in students' attitudes towards the specific strands of mathematics. Both girls and boys in Grade 5 were more likely than students in Grade 3 to believe that mathematics was relevant to their lives. Virtually all children thought that both girls and boys needed to study mathematics. No gender or grade differences in students' beliefs regarding the process of learning mathematics were observed. The results support the need for further research to identify variables that influence the development of student perceptions and attitudes toward mathematics during elementary school.     

Perceptions of Mathematics and Gender

This study examined students’ perceptions about gender and the subject of mathematics, as well as gender and mathematics learning. Secondary school students and pre‐service elementary teachers were surveyed using the Mathematics as a Gendered Domain and Who and Mathematics instruments developed by Leder and Forgasz ( Leder, 2001 ). The data indicate that, similar to findings from the 1970s, students believe that mathematics is gender neutral, although females hold this belief more strongly than males. Female secondary school students hold beliefs in gender neutrality more strongly than female pre‐service teachers. Data for secondary school students indicate that both males and females see differences in the way boys and girls act and are treated in mathematics classes (e.g., boys cause more distractions while girls care more about doing well). The data also show that secondary school males who believe they are good mathematics students tend to have more gender‐neutral perceptions than those who believe they are average or below average. No such pattern appears for secondary school females.     

Gender Aspects of Participation,Support, and Success in a State Science Fair

This study of students competing in the 2009 Massachusetts State Science & Engineering Fair investigates the role gender played in students' participation, choice of science field, award of prizes, and mentioning inspiring teachers. Females made up 62% of the participants and were more likely to enter projects in biology and in earth/space/environmental sciences, whereas males were more heavily represented in engineering. Girls and boys were equally likely to receive an award. Nearly half of both the girls and the boys reported having an inspiring teacher, but this was not associated with greater student success. Furthermore, for girls, the gender of the inspiring teacher did not influence the chances of winning an award.     

High-Stakes Testing: Barrier to Gifted Girls in Mathematics and Science?

The gender gap in scores on the mathematics section of the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT-M) is currently approximately 30 points for academically gifted middle school students who take the SAT as part of Talent Search participation. This paper explores possible reasons for the gap, including test bias, variability in scores, the timed nature of the test, and environmental factors. When the SAT-M is used as the sole criterion for admission, gender differences in scores mean that disparate numbers of boys and girls are identified for high-level mathematics and science programs. Solutions to the problem are proposed, taking the perspective that the goal of the special programs is to identify and serve students who are likely to benefit from and be successful in such programs.     

Gender, technology and attitude towards mathematics: a comparative longitudinal study with Mexican students

In this paper the results of a comparative longitudinal study investigating changes in girls’ and boys’ attitudes towards mathematics, and self-confidence in mathematics are presented. A 5-point Likert scale, AMMEC, was used to measure attitudes towards mathematics (AM), computer-based mathematics (AMC), and self-confidence in mathematics (CM). A total of 430 students using technology for mathematics and 109 students not using it were monitored for 3 years. At the beginning of the study, the participants were aged about 13 years. The statistical analyses of the data showed few gender differences in the way students’ attitudes and self-confidence changed over the 3 years. Significant gender differences favouring boys were found in attitudes towards mathematics in grades 8 and 9 for the group using technology. For the group using technology, significantly more boys than girls got high scores in attitudes towards computer-based mathematics in grade 7. Significantly, more girls using technology than girls not using it got high scores in grade 8. The use of technology did not have a positive impact on students’ self-confidence. Regardless of whether they used computers or not, from grades 7 to 9, there was a decrease in the self-confidence in mathematics of both boys and girls. To enrich these results and detect possible gender differences in the way attitudes were constructed, 12 girls and 13 boys were interviewed at the end of the study. The analysis of the arguments they presented to explain and justify their attitudes towards mathematics, computer-based mathematics, and their self-confidence in working in mathematics provided evidence of important gender differences in the ways in which boys and girls construct their attitude, indicating how their constructions reflect the gender stereotypes within Mexican society.     

Gender Equity in Mathematics: Beliefs of Students,Parents, and Teachers

The attitudes about mathematics held by girls and boys participating in a regional mathematics contest, their parents, teachers, and mathematics coaches were investigated. Quantitative data regarding mathematics as a male domain, perception of importance of mathematics, confidence in learning mathematics, effectance motivation, and usefulness of mathematics were obtained. It was found that the traditional gender‐based differences in the beliefs regarding mathematics persist even in these mathematically talented students. Furthermore, parents' responses to the questions regarding the role of mathematics revealed that mothers, more than fathers, focused on the computational aspects of mathematics, while fathers more than mothers mentioned the role of mathematics in science or as a language. Boys, fathers, and certain mathematics teachers admitted to a low level of gender stereotyping, as evidenced by their scores on the Mathematics as a Male Domain subscale. However, the girls, mothers, and mathematics coaches did not endorse this stereotyping. Unsolicited responses of girls and mothers, in fact, emphatically denied that gender stereotyping exists. These findings are discussed in terms of the need to resolve the essential conflicts between students', parents', and teachers' deeply held beliefs regarding the nature of mathematics, gender differences in mathematical abilities, and the desire for equity within mathematics education.     

An overview of the gender factor in mathematics in TIMSS-2003 for the Asia-Pacific region

This paper highlights the gender factor in the Trends in Mathematics and Science Study in 2003 (TIMSS-2003) of eight participating countries from the Asia-Pacific region: Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong-SAR, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines (Chinese Taipei and Hong Kong-SAR will be referred to as countries in this paper.) in mathematics. The focus is on gender-related data encompassing the overall performance of students from the participating countries and their performance in the content and cognitive domains. At grade 8 level, the gender difference in the overall performance of students mirrored the international average and favored girls in all countries of the Asia-Pacific region (except in Japan and the Republic of Korea). The regional data also showed that, in general, the Philippines and Singapore can be considered to be at one extreme with gender differences favoring girls in both content and cognitive domains, and the Republic of Korea and to some extent Japan are at the other extreme with the gender differences favoring boys. At grade 4 level, girls from the Philippines and Singapore also performed better than the boys whereas the boys from Japan and Chinese Taipei did slightly better than the girls.     

What Children Bring to the Classroom: Learning Science From Experience

Extracurricular science-related experiences of young students were examined. The sample consisted of 539 elementary school students between the ages of 9 and 13. Students completed the Science Experiences Survey (SES) to identify the number of common scientific materials and activities they experienced outside of the classroom. The factor analysis isolated three underlying factors of extracurricular science-related experiences: life science-related experiences, physical science-related experiences, and general learning attributes related to science. Further analysis identified differences in reported experiences by gender. The data indicate that young girls tend to participate in nurturing life science-related activities, and young boys favor hands-on, action-oriented physical science-related experiences. The research suggests that the gender disparity in science follows a continuuum that begins with the experiences of elementary school students.     

Gender differences in the mathematics achievements of German primary school students: results from a German large-scale study

In Germany, national standards for mathematics for the end of primary school were established in 2004. In the present study, data were collected to evaluate these standards, and were used to compare the mathematical skills of girls and boys. Many studies have shown that gender differences are strongest at the highest levels of education. The findings from primary school are less consistent. Thus, in our study we analyzed achievement differences in a sample of approximately 10,000 third and fourth graders, representative of the German elementary school population. Gender-specific competencies were compared in the different content domains, both for the general mathematical competence, and for the cognitive levels of the tasks. Overall, boys outperformed girls, but substantial variation was found between the content domains and general mathematical achievement. Differences were higher in grade three than in grade four. The proportion of boys in the classroom did not appear to affect the individual level of performance. Analysis of the items on which boys or girls clearly outperformed each other reproduced a pattern of specific item characteristics predicting gender bias consistent with those reported in previous studies in other countries.     

Gender Differences in Science Achievement: Differential Effect of Ability,Response Format,and Strands of Learning Outcomes

The purpose of this study was to determine patterns of gender differences in science achievement of fifth graders, taking into account the role of ethnicity, ability, response format, and strands of learning outcomes. The results indicated that the gender differences in science achievement did not depend on ethnicity. However, response format, ability, and strands of learning outcomes had differential effects on student performance. In particular, at the high ability level boys did better than girls on the open-ended format in physical sciences, but there were no gender differences in nature of science, earth and space sciences, and life sciences. There were no gender differences in science achievement for the low and medium ability students. Regardless of gender, the largest achievement gaps between the low, medium, and high ability students were on the open-ended format in physical sciences.     

Prospective Elementary Teachers' Perceptions of Gender Differences in Children's Attitudes Toward Mathematics

Prospective elementary teachers hold preconceived ideas about elementary school students' attitudes toward mathematics. We found that there exists a gender bias with prospective teachers expecting girls to have negative attitudes toward mathematics and boys more likely to have positive attitudes toward mathematics. We found that these expectations exist for both prospective teachers in a traditional undergraduate degree program and prospective teachers in an alternative licensure graduate degree program. We also found that these expectations do change with the completion of a mathematics methods course and classroom experiences.     

How Students “Unpack” the Structure of a Word Problem: Graphic Representations and Problem Solving

This research investigated how fourth and fifth grade students spontaneously ‘unpacked’ a word problem when generating a graphic representation to aid in problem solution. Relationships among the type of graphic representation produced, spatial visualization, drawing ability, gender, and problem solving also were examined and described. Instrumentation developed for the study included several math challenge tasks, a spatial visualization task, and a drawing task. For one of the math challenge tasks, students were instructed to draw a picture to assist them with problem solution. These graphic representations generated by students were rated as pictorial or as displaying some level of schematic representation. Schematic representations included germane information from the problem supportive of problem solution. Pictorial representations included expressive and extraneous elements not necessary for problem solution, with no schematic elements. Findings indicated that the majority of students rendered schematic representations, with girls more likely than boys to use schematic representations at a statistically significant level. Students who used schematic visual representations were more successful problem solvers than those pictorially representing problem elements. The more “schematic‐like” the visual representation, the more successful students were at problem solution. Drawing a pictorial representation in the math challenge task also was negatively correlated to drawing skill.     

Gender Differences in Toddlers’ Visual-Spatial Skills

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether there are visual-spatial gender differences in two-year-olds, to investigate the environmental and cognitive factors that contribute to two-year-olds’ visual-spatial skills, and to explore whether these factors differ for boys and girls. Children (N = 63; M_age = 28.17 months) were assessed on their visual-spatial skills and on measures related to visual-spatial skills: intelligence, quantitative reasoning, working memory, and home spatial activity engagement. Children’s mothers were assessed on mental rotation ability. Results found no difference between boys’ and girls’ visual-spatial skills at age two. Quantitative reasoning contributed the most to girls’ visual-spatial skills. No variables were predictive for the boys, though boys with higher spatial activity frequency had higher visual-spatial skills. The differential predictors have implications for the development and fostering of visual-spatial skills, particularly for girls, who may be at a disadvantage in this area when they are older.     

Student Academic Self‐Concept and Perception of Classroom Environment in Single‐Sex and Coeducational Middle Grades Mathematics Classes

In this article, we present findings from a study that investigated the relationship between all‐girls classes, all‐boys classes, and coeducational classes on student mathematics self‐concept and student perception of classroom environment. Further, we compared responses of girls in all‐girls classes to girls in coeducational classes and responses of boys in all‐boys classes to boys in coeducational classes. Using the Mathematics Attitude Scale and the What Is Happening in This Class? questionnaire, we found no significant differences in student responses on any of the subscales or domains for any of the subgroups, except for Math as a Male Domain. Our findings indicate that student mathematics self‐concept and student perception of the classroom environment are similar regardless of whether students are in a single‐sex or a coeducational class.     

Impact of Middle School Student Energy Monitoring Activities on Climate Change Beliefs and Intentions

The Going Green! Middle Schoolers Out to Save the World project aims to direct middle school students' enthusiasm for hands‐on activities toward interest in science and other STEM areas while guiding them to solve real‐world problems. Students in this project are taught by their teachers to use energy monitoring equipment to audit standby power consumed by electronic devices in their homes and communities. Major findings were: (a) Beliefs in climate change increased more for students in the treatment than comparison group, pre to post; and (b) For girls there was a larger positive impact on climate change beliefs than for boys. These and additional findings presented in this paper provide evidence that a hands‐on engaged‐learning curriculum can have a positive influence on climate change beliefs and intentions and strengthen the association between the two constructs.     

Gender Differences in Attitudes toward Environmental Science

This study examined the role of gender in the areas of environmental education that included environmental knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and comfort levels in the outdoors. The current study was part of a larger study designed to explore the effects of a treatment that consisted of 14 weeks of outdoor lessons conducted in the schoolyard as compared with a control group of students who had 14 weeks of traditional classroom environmental education lessons. This follow‐up study focused on gender and its effect on each of the areas studied. Researchers found significance in boys' and girls' attitudes toward the environment. Quantitative and qualitative data were used to offer an in‐depth view of students' environmental attitudes. The results from this study can have implications for science educators in an effort to capitalize on boys' and girls' interests in science to help them learn about environmental issues and to recruit both boys and girls into science careers.     

Effects of gender and ethnicity on fourth graders’ knowledge states in mathematics

This study sheds light on the achievement gap between two culturally diverse populations in Israel by employing a diagnostic model for analysing responses of a representative sample of Jewish and Arab fourth graders on a national mathematics test. The results indicated large significant differences, in favour of the Jewish group, on most attributes underlying the test, and relatively small significant gender effects only in the Jewish group, where boys outscored girls on higher-order thinking attributes. These results were discussed in light of cultural differences between the two populations, educational resources, and prevalent instruction–learning–assessment cultures in their respective schools.     

Content Analysis of Gender‐related Differential Item Functioning TIMSS Items in Mathematics in Jordan

The purpose of this study is to analyze items that exhibit gender‐related Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in Mathematics in Jordan. Data was taken from the TIMSS 1999 of Jordan, which includes responses of 5,299 eighth grade students. Mantel‐Haenszel (MH) DIF procedure was applied to 124 multiple‐choice items. The results showed that 37 items exhibited gender‐related DIF. The analysis of the content of these items reflected some patterns that need further investigation. All the DIF items in measurement content favored male students while most of the DIF items in algebraic and data analysis contents favored female students. Most of the DIF items that negatively impacted on females were unfamiliar items that required some risk taking such as estimation, expectation, or approximation. On the other hand, most of the DIF items that favored females were familiar items which have one specific correct answer. Some implications for both research and teaching practice are provided.     

Gender,Achievement, and Perception Toward Science Activities

The purpose of this study was to investigate the perception toward science activities and science achievement of boys and girls in middle school life science. Student perceptions toward science activities and achievement were measured in three different instructional treatments: textbook-worksheet, traditional laboratory, and Search, Solve, Create, Share (SSCS) problem solving. The results indicate no significant difference in student achievement by gender or science activities, and no significant difference in perception by gender. However, a significant difference (p<.05) was obtained for student perception by science activities. Follow-up comparisons suggested significant differences among SSCS problem solving and traditional laboratory and textbook-worksheet activities, with no difference between traditional laboratory and textbook-worksheet activities.     

Computational Estimation Performance on Whole‐Number Multiplication by Third‐ and Fifth‐Grade Chinese Students

Four hundred and three 3rd‐ and 5th‐grade Chinese students took the Multiplication Estimation Test or participated in the interview on it, designed to assess their computational estimation performance on whole‐number multiplication. Students perform better when tasks are presented visually than orally. Third graders tend to use rounding based while fifth graders tend to use written algorithm based strategies, but boys' and girls ‘performances do not differ. It is concluded that students often will not estimate simply at the request to estimate if an exact answer is within their mental computation capability, and a two‐step process is suggested for helping students decide what route to take when given arithmetic problems.