2,4,6‐Tri(hydroxy)‐1,3,5‐triphosphinine,P3C3(OH)3: The Phosphorus Analogue of Cyanuric Acid

Cyanuric acid (C₃H₃N₃O₃) is widely used as cross‐linker in basic polymers (often in combination with other crosslinking agents like melamine) but also finds application in more sophisticated materials such as in supramolecular assemblies and molecular sheets. The unknown phosphorus analogue of cyanuric acid, P₃C₃(OH)₃, may become an equally useful building block for phosphorus‐based polymers or materials which have unique properties. ¹ Herein we describe a straightforward synthesis of 2,4,6‐tri(hydroxy)‐1,3,5‐triphosphinine and its derivatives P₃C₃(OR)₃ which have been applied as strong π‐acceptor η⁶‐ligands in piano stool Mo(CO)₃ complexes.     

Pendant structure governed anion sensing property for sulfonamide‐functionalized poly(phenylacetylene)s bearing various α‐amino acids

The colorimetric detection of anionic species has been studied for α‐amino acid‐conjugated poly(phenylacetylene)s, which were prepared by the polymerization of the ethyl esters of N‐(4‐ethynylphenylsulfonyl)‐L ‐alanine, L ‐isoleucine, L ‐valine, L ‐phenylalanine, L ‐aspartic acid, and L ‐glutamic acid using Rh⁺(2,5‐norbornadiene)[(η⁶‐C₆H₅)B^?(C₆H₅)₃] as the catalyst in CHCl₃. The one‐handed helical conformations of all the sulfonamide‐functionalized polymers were characterized by Cotton effects in the circular dichroism spectra. The addition of anions with a relatively high basicity, such as tetra‐n‐butylammonium acetate and fluoride, induced drastic changes in both the optical and chiroptical properties. On the other hand, anions with a relatively low basicity, such as tetra‐n‐butylammonium nitrate, azide, and bromide, had essentially no effects on the helical conformation of all the sulfonamide‐functionalized polymers. The anion signaling property of the sulfonamide‐functionalized polymers possessing α‐amino acid moieties was significantly affected by the installed residual amino acid structures. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 1683–1689, 2010     

[CpR(OC)Mo(μ‐η2:2‐P2)2FeCpR′] als Edukt für heterobimetallische Zweikerncluster mit P2‐ und CnRnP4‐n‐Liganden (n = 1, 2)

[Cp^R(OC)Mo(μ‐η^2:2‐P₂)₂FeCp^R′] as Educt for Heterobimetallic Dinuclear Clusters with P₂ and C_nR_nP_4‐n Ligands (n = 1, 2) The cothermolysis of [Cp^R(OC)Mo(μ‐η^2:2‐P₂)₂FeCp^R′] ( 1 ) and tBuC≡P ( 2 ) as well as PhC≡CPh ( 3 ) affords the heterobimetallic triple‐decker like dinuclear clusters [(Cp'''Mo)(Cp*′Fe)(P₃CtBu)(P₂)] ( 4 ), Cp''' = C₅H₂tBu₃‐1,2,4, Cp*′ = C₅Me₄Et, and [(Cp*Mo)(Cp*Fe)(P₂C₂Ph₂)(P₂)] ( 5 ) with a bridging tri‐ and diphosphabutadiendiyl ligand. 4 and 5 have been characterized additionally by X‐ray crystallography.     

Two two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded coordination networks: bis(3‐carboxybenzoato‐κO)bis(4‐methyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN3)copper(II) and bis(3‐methylbenzoato‐κN)bis(4‐methyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN3)copper(II) monohydrate

The title two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded coordination compounds, [Cu(C₈H₅O₄)₂(C₄H₆N₂)₂], (I), and [Cu(C₈H₇O₂)₂(C₄H₆N₂)₂]·H₂O, (II), have been synthesized and structurally characterized. The molecule of complex (I) lies across an inversion centre, and the Cu²⁺ ion is coordinated by two N atoms from two 4‐methyl‐1H‐imidazole (4‐MeIM) molecules and two O atoms from two 3‐carboxybenzoate (HBDC⁻) anions in a square‐planar geometry. Adjacent molecules are linked through intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds into a two‐dimensional sheet with (4,4) topology. In the asymmetric part of the unit cell of (II) there are two symmetry‐independent molecules, in which each Cu²⁺ ion is also coordinated by two N atoms from two 4‐MeIM molecules and two O atoms from two 3‐methylbenzoate (3‐MeBC⁻) anions in a square‐planar coordination. Two neutral complex molecules are held together via N—H...O(carboxylate) hydrogen bonds to generate a dimeric pair, which is further linked via discrete water molecules into a two‐dimensional network with the Schläfli symbol (4³)₂(4⁶,6⁶,8³). In both compounds, as well as the strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds, π–π interactions also stabilize the crystal stacking.     

One‐Dimensional Polymers Based on Silver(I) Cations and Organometallic cyclo‐P3 Ligand Complexes

The synthesis and characterization of the first supramolecular aggregates incorporating the organometallic cyclo‐P₃ ligand complexes [Cp^RMo(CO)₂(η³‐P₃)] (Cp^R=Cp (C₅H₅; 1a ), Cp* (C₅(CH₃)₅; 1b )) as linking units is described. The reaction of the Cp derivative 1a with AgX (X=CF₃SO₃, Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄) yields the one‐dimensional (1D) coordination polymers [Ag{CpMo(CO)₂(μ,η³:η¹:η¹‐P₃)}₂]_n[Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄]_n ( 2 ) and [Ag{CpMo(CO)₂(μ,η³:η¹:η¹‐P₃)}₃]_n[X]_n (X=CF₃SO₃ ( 3a ), Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄ ( 3b )). The solid‐state structures of these polymers were revealed by X‐ray crystallography and shown to comprise polycationic chains well‐separated from the weakly coordinating anions. If AgCF₃SO₃ is used, polymer 3a is obtained regardless of reactant stoichiometry whereas in the case of Ag[Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄], reactant stoichiometry plays a decisive role in determining the structure and composition of the resulting product. Moreover, polymers 3a, b are the first examples of homoleptic silver complexes in which Ag^I centers are found octahedrally coordinated to six phosphorus atoms. The Cp* derivative 1b reacts with Ag[Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄] to yield the 1D polymer [Ag{Cp*Mo(CO)₂(μ,η³:η²:η¹‐P₃)}₂]_n[Al{OC(CF₃)₃}₄]_n ( 4 ), the crystal structure of which differs from that of polymer 2 in the coordination mode of the cyclo‐P₃ ligands: in 2 , the Ag⁺ cations are bridged by the cyclo‐P₃ ligands in a η¹:η¹ (edge bridging) fashion whereas in 4 , they are bridged exclusively in a η²:η¹ mode (face bridging). Thus, one third of the phosphorus atoms in 2 are not coordinated to silver while in 4 , all phosphorus atoms are engaged in coordination with silver. Comprehensive spectroscopic and analytical measurements revealed that the polymers 2 , 3a , b , and 4 depolymerize extensively upon dissolution and display dynamic behavior in solution, as evidenced in particular by variable temperature ³¹P NMR spectroscopy. Solid‐state ³¹P magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR measurements, performed on the polymers 2 , 3b , and 4 , demonstrated that the polymers 2 and 3b also display dynamic behavior in the solid state at room temperature. The X‐ray crystallographic characterisation of 1b is also reported.     

“Cage‐like” Carboxyl Bridged Octaphenyltetraantimony Compounds (SbPh2)4(μ‐O)4(μ‐OH)2(μ‐O2CR)2: Synthesis and Structural Characterization

The metal‐directed self‐assembly of biphenylantimony trichloride and homocarboxylic acids LH [L = 2‐CHO‐C₆H₄COO^– ( 1 ), 2, 3‐2F‐C₆H₄COO^– ( 2 ), 4‐CF₃–C₆H₄COO^– ( 3 )] provided three novel tetranuclear organoantimony(V) complexes, which were characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR, ¹H, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy as well as melting point, and X‐ray single crystal analysis. In the molecular structure, four hexacoordinate antimony atoms are linked into a [Sb₂(μ‐O)₂]₂(μ‐O)₂ “cage” architecture by oxo‐bridges which are terminally bridged by two carboxyl groups.     

A three‐dimensional coordination polymer based on the Zn4(μ3‐OH)2 unit: poly[[(μ4‐benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylato)bis(μ3‐benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylato)bis(μ3‐hydroxido)bis(1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione)tetrazinc] dihydrate]

The title compound, {[Zn₄(C₈H₄O₄)₃(OH)₂(C₁₂H₆N₂O₂)₂]·2H₂O}_n, has been prepared hydrothermally by the reaction of Zn(NO₃)₂·6H₂O with benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylic acid (H₂bdc) and 1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione (pdon) in H₂O. In the crystal structure, a tetranuclear Zn₄(OH)₂ fragment is located on a crystallographic inversion centre which relates two subunits, each containing a [ZnN₂O₄] octahedron and a [ZnO₄] tetrahedron bridged by a μ₃‐OH group. The pdon ligand chelates to zinc through its two N atoms to form part of the [ZnN₂O₄] octahedron. The two crystallographically independent bdc²⁻ ligands are fully deprotonated and adopt μ₃‐κO:κO′:κO′′ and μ₄‐κO:κO′:κO′′:κO′′′ coordination modes, bridging three or four Zn^II cations, respectively, from two Zn₄(OH)₂ units. The Zn₄(OH)₂ fragment connects six neighbouring tetranuclear units through four μ₃‐bdc²⁻ and two μ₄‐bdc²⁻ ligands, forming a three‐dimensional framework with uninodal 6‐connected α‐Po topology, in which the tetranuclear Zn₄(OH)₂ units are considered as 6‐connected nodes and the bdc²⁻ ligands act as linkers. The uncoordinated water molecules are located on opposite sides of the Zn₄(OH)₂ unit and are connected to it through hydrogen‐bonding interactions involving hydroxide and carboxylate groups. The structure is further stabilized by extensive π–π interactions between the pdon and μ₄‐bdc²⁻ ligands.     

Poly[di‐μ‐aqua‐μ‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethene‐κ2N:N′‐tetrakis(4‐iodobenzoato‐κ2O,O′)dicadmium]

Colourless crystals of the title compound, [Cd₂(C₇H₄IO₂)₄(C₁₂H₁₀N₂)(H₂O)₂]_n, were obtained by the self‐assembly of Cd(NO₃)₂·4H₂O, 1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethene (bpe) and 4‐iodobenzoic acid (4‐IBA). Each Cd^II atom is seven‐coordinated in a pentagonal–bipyramidal coordination environment by four carboxylate O atoms from two different 4‐IBA ligands, two O atoms from two water molecules and one N atom from a bpe ligand. The Cd^II centres are bridged by the aqua molecules and bpe ligands, which lie across centres of inversion, to give a two‐dimensional net. Topologically, taking the Cd^II atoms as nodes and the μ‐aqua and μ‐bpe ligands as linkers, the two‐dimensional structure can be simplified as a (6,3) network.     

Poly[aqua(μ3‐benzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylato)bis(μ3‐hydroxido)bis(μ2‐isonicotinato)dierbium(III) monohydrate] and the thulium analogue

The two isomorphous lanthanide coordination polymers, {[Ln₂(C₆H₄NO₂)₂(C₈H₄O₄)(OH)₂(H₂O)]·H₂O}_n (Ln = Er and Tm), contain two crystallographically independent Ln ions which are both eight‐coordinated by O atoms, but with quite different coordination environments. In both crystal structures, adjacent Ln atoms are bridged by μ₃‐OH groups and carboxylate groups of isonicotinate and benzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylate ligands, forming infinite chains in which the Er...Er and Tm...Tm distances are in the ranges 3.622 (3)–3.894 (4) and 3.599 (7)–3.873 (1) Å, respectively. Adjacent chains are further connected through hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions into a three‐dimensional supramolecular framework.     

A threefold interpenetrated two‐dimensional zinc(II) supramolecular architecture based on 3‐nitrobenzoic acid and 4,4′‐bipyridine

With regard to crystal engineering, building block or modular assembly methodologies have shown great success in the design and construction of metal–organic coordination polymers. The critical factor for the construction of coordination polymers is the rational choice of the organic building blocks and the metal centre. The reaction of Zn(OAc)₂·2H₂O (OAc is acetate) with 3‐nitrobenzoic acid (HNBA) and 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bipy) under hydrothermal conditions produced a two‐dimensional zinc(II) supramolecular architecture, catena‐poly[[bis(3‐nitrobenzoato‐κ²O,O′)zinc(II)]‐μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine‐κ²N:N′], [Zn(C₇H₄NO₄)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)]_n or [Zn(NBA)₂(4,4′‐bipy)]_n, which was characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. The Zn^II ions are connected by the 4,4′‐bipy ligands to form a one‐dimensional zigzag chain and the chains are decorated with anionic NBA ligands which interact further through aromatic π–π stacking interactions, expanding the structure into a threefold interpenetrated two‐dimensional supramolecular architecture. The solid‐state fluorescence analysis indicates a slight blue shift compared with pure 4,4′‐bipyridine and HNBA.     

Encapsulation of Triphenylene Derivatives in the Hexanuclear Arene Ruthenium Metallo‐Prismatic Cage [Ru6(p‐PriC6H4Me)6(tpt)2(dhbq)3]6+ (tpt = 2,4,6‐tri(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,5‐triazine,dhbq = 2,5‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinonato)

A large cationic triangular metallo‐prism, [Ru₆(p‐PrⁱC₆H₄Me)₆(tpt)₂(dhbq)₃]⁶⁺ ( 1 )⁶⁺, incorporating p‐cymene ruthenium building blocks, bridged by 2,5‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinonato (dhbq) ligands, and connected by two 2,4,6‐tri(pyridin‐4‐yl)‐1,3,5‐triazine (tpt) subunits, allows the permanent encapsulation of the triphenylene derivatives hexahydroxytriphenylene, C₁₈H₆(OH)₆ and hexamethoxytriphenylene, C₁₈H₆(OMe)₆. These two cationic carceplex systems [C₁₈H₆(OH)₆⊂ 1 ]⁶⁺ and [C₁₈H₆(OMe)₆⊂ 1 ]⁶⁺ have been isolated as their triflate salts. The molecular structure of these systems has been established by one‐dimensional ¹H ROESY NMR experiments as well as by the single‐crystal structure analysis of [C₁₈H₆(OMe)₆⊂ 1 ][O₃SCF₃]₆.     

Association of hydrophobically α,ω‐end‐capped poly(2‐methyl‐2‐oxazoline) in water

The α,ω‐end‐capped poly(2‐methyl‐2‐oxazoline) (C_n‐POXZ‐C_n) have been synthesized by a one‐pot process using cationic ring‐opening polymerization with an appropriate initiator and terminating agent. The polymers bearing different alkyl groups C₁₂ and C₁₈ have molecular weight in the range of 2.4 × 10³ to 14 × 10³ with a small polydispersity index. The solution behavior of the free chains has been analyzed in a nonselective solvent, dichloromethane, by small‐angle neutron scattering and dynamic light scattering. These amphiphilic polymers associate in water to form flower‐like micellar structures. Critical micelle concentrations, investigated by fluorescence technique, are in the range of 0.03–0.5 g L^?1 and are dependent on the hydrophilic/lipophilic balance. The structural properties of the aggregates have also been investigated by viscometry. Intrinsic viscosities of these polymers are in the same range as that of the precursors poly(2‐methyl‐2‐oxazoline) (POXZ) and mono‐functionalized polymers. Large viscosity increase corresponding to intermicellar bridging was observed in the vicinity of the micelle overlap concentration. Addition of hydroxypropyl β‐cyclodextrin (HβCD) has dissociated the aggregates and the intrinsic viscosities of the HβCD‐end‐capped chains have become comparable with the ones of POXZ precursor chains. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 48: 2477–2485, 2010     

Mo4(η3‐allyl)4Cl2(OH)2(CO)8: the first cubane‐type Mo2+ organometallic complex with μ3‐OH and μ3‐Cl bridges

The reaction between fluorenyllithium and Mo(η³‐C₃H₅)Cl(NCMe)₂(CO)₂ led to the isolation of di‐μ₃‐chlorido‐di‐μ₃‐hydroxido‐tetrakis[(η³‐allyl)dicarbonylmolybdenum(II)]–9‐fluorenone–tetrahydrofuran (1/1/1), [Mo₄(C₃H₅)₄Cl₂(OH)₂(CO)₈]·C₄H₈O·C₁₃H₈O. The tetrametallic Mo₄ unit constitutes the first example of a complex containing simultaneously two μ₃‐OH groups and two μ₃‐Cl anions capping the metallic trigonal prism. The four crystallographically independent Mo²⁺ centres exhibit distorted octahedral geometry with the η³‐allyl groups being trans‐coordinated to a μ₃‐OH group and the carbonyl groups occupying the equatorial plane. Space‐filling tetrahydrofuran and 9‐fluorenone molecules are engaged in strong O—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interactions with Mo₄(η³‐allyl)₄Cl₂(OH)₂(CO)₈ complexes.     

[μ‐4,5‐Bis(diphenylphosphino)‐9,9‐dimethylxanthene]bis[(trifluoroacetato)gold(I)] and its dichloromethane 0.58‐solvate

The dinuclear Au^I complex containing the 4,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐9,9‐dimethylxanthene (xantphos) ligand and trifluoroacetate anions exists in a solvent‐free form, [μ‐4,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐9,9‐dimethylxanthene]bis[(trifluoroacetato)gold(I)], [Au₂(C₂F₃O₂)₂(C₃₉H₃₂OP₂)], (I), and as a dichloromethane solvate, [Au₂(C₂F₃O₂)₂(C₃₉H₃₂OP₂)]·0.58CH₂Cl₂, (II). The trifluoroacetate anions are coordinated to the Au^I centres bridged by the xantphos ligand in both compounds. The Au^I atoms are in distorted linear coordination environments in both compounds. The phosphine substituents are in a syn arrangement in the xantphos ligand, which facilitates the formation of short aurophilic Au...Au interactions of 2.8966 (8) Å in (I) and 2.9439 (6) Å in (II).     

Bis[μ3‐1,8‐bis(triisopropylsilylamido)naphthalene]bis(tetrahydrofuran)di‐μ3‐oxido‐dimanganese(III)disodium

The solid‐state structure of the title compound, [Na₂Mn₂(C₃₂H₅₆N₂OSi₂)₂O₂] or [1,8‐C₁₀H₆(NSiⁱPr₃)₂Mn(μ₃‐O)Na(THF)]₂, which lies across a crystallographic twofold axis, exhibits a central [Mn₂O₂Na₂]⁴⁺ core, with two oxide groups, each triply bridging between the two Mn^III ions and an Na⁺ ion. Additional coordination is provided to each Mn^III centre by a 1,8‐C₁₀H₆(NSiⁱPr₃)₂ [1,8‐bis(triisopropylsilylamido)naphthalene] ligand and to the Na⁺ centres by a tetrahydrofuran molecule. The presence of an additional Na...H—C agostic interaction potentially contributes to the distortion around the bridging oxide group.     

4‐Carboxyanilinium (2R,3R)‐tartrate and a redetermination of the α‐polymorph of 4‐aminobenzoic acid

In the title compounds, 4‐carboxyanilinium (2R,3R)‐tartrate, C₇H₈NO₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻, (I), and 4‐aminobenzoic acid, C₇H₇NO₂, (II), the carboxyl planes of the 4‐carboxyanilinium cations/4‐aminobenzoic acid are twisted from the aromatic plane. In (I), the characteristic head‐to‐tail interactions are observed through the tartrate anions, forming two C₂²(7) chain motifs propagating parallel to the a and c axes of the unit cell. Also, the tartrate anions are connected through two primary C₁¹(6) and C₁¹(7) chain motifs, leading to a secondary R₄⁴(22) ring motif. In (II), head‐to‐tail interaction is seen through a discrete D₁¹(2) motif and carboxyl group dimerization is observed through centrosymmetrically related R₂²(8) motifs around the inversion centres of the unit cell. The crystal structures of both compounds are stabilized by intricate three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding networks. Alternate hydrophobic and hydrophilic layers are observed in (I) as a result of a column‐like arrangement of the anions and the aromatic rings of the cations.     

[μ‐1κ2O,O′:2(η5)‐Cyclopentadienylcarboxylato][2(η5)‐diphenylphosphinocyclopentadienyl]bis[1,1(η5)‐tetramethylcyclopentadienyl]iron(II)titanium(III)

Reacting stoichiometric amounts of 1‐(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene­carboxylic acid and [Ti(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)₂(η²‐Me₃SiC[triple‐bond]CSiMe₃)] produced the title carboxyl­atotitanocene complex, [{μ‐1κ²O,O′:2(η⁵)‐C₅H₄CO₂}{2(η⁵)‐C₅H₄P(C₆H₅)₂}{1(η⁵)‐C₅H(CH₃)₄}₂Fe^IITi^III] or [FeTi(C₉H₁₃)₂(C₆H₄O₂)(C₁₇H₁₄P)]. The angle subtended by the Ti/O/O′ plane, where O and O′ are the donor atoms of the κ²‐carboxy­late group, and the plane of the carboxyl‐substituted ferrocene cyclo­penta­dienyl is 24.93 (6)°.     

Redetermination of hexa­carbonyl­(η5‐cyclo­penta­dienyl)­bis(μ3‐selenido)­diiron(II)­cobalt(II)

The structure of the title compound, hexa­carbonyl‐1κ³C,2κ³C‐[3(η⁵)‐cyclo­penta­dienyl]­bis(μ₃‐selenido)­diiron(II)­cobalt(II),[CoFe₂(μ₃‐Se)₂(C₅H₅)(CO)₆], was redetermined at room temperature and the correct C2/c space group was assumed instead of the previously reported P space group [Mathur et al. (1995). Organometallics, 14 , 2115–2118]. Analysis of the literature data showed that the previously reported triclinic parameters correspond to a primitive subcell of the actual monoclinic C‐centred cell with cell dimensions close to those found by us. The title compound appeared to be isostructural with the sulfur–selenium analogue.     

A novel three‐dimensional CdII coordination polymer: poly[[aquabis(2,2′‐bipyridine)(μ5‐pyrazol‐1‐ide‐3,5‐dicarboxylato)(μ4‐pyrazol‐1‐ide‐3,5‐dicarboxylato)(μ3‐pyrazole‐3,5‐dicarboxylato)tetracadmium(II)] dihydrate]

The title compound, {[Cd₄(C₅H₂N₂O₄)(C₅HN₂O₄)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂(H₂O)]·2H₂O}_n, crystallized in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n and displays a three‐dimensional architecture. The asymmetric unit is composed of four crystallographically independent Cd^II centres, two triply deprotonated pyrazole‐3,5‐dicarboxylic acid molecules, one doubly deprotonated pyrazole‐3,5‐dicarboxylic acid molecule, two 2,2′‐bipyridine ligands, one coordinated water molecule and two interstitial water molecules. Interestingly, the Cd^II centers exhibit two different coordination numbers. Two Cd^II centres adopt a distorted octahedral arrangement and a third a trigonal–prismatic geometry, though they are all hexacoordinated. However, the fourth Cd^II center is heptacoordinated and displays a pentagonal–bipyramidal geometry. The three anionic ligands adopt μ₃‐, μ₄‐ and μ₅‐bridging modes, first linking Cd^II centers into a one‐dimensional wave‐like band, then into a wave‐like layer and finally into a three‐dimensional coordination framework, which is stabilized by hydrogen bonds.     

Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of l‐tartaric acid with the associative‐group monosubstituted pyridines 3‐aminopyridine, 3‐carboxypyridine (nicotinic acid) and 2‐carboxypyridine (picolinic acid)

The 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of l ‐tartaric acid with 3‐aminopyridine [3‐aminopyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate dihydrate, C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻·2H₂O, (I)], pyridine‐3‐carboxylic acid (nicotinic acid) [anhydrous 3‐carboxypyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate, C₆H₆NO₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻, (II)] and pyridine‐2‐carboxylic acid [2‐carboxypyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate monohydrate, C₆H₆NO₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻·H₂O, (III)] have been determined. In (I) and (II), there is a direct pyridinium–carboxyl N⁺—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interaction, four‐centred in (II), giving conjoint cyclic R₁²(5) associations. In contrast, the N—H...O association in (III) is with a water O‐atom acceptor, which provides links to separate tartrate anions through O_hydroxy acceptors. All three compounds have the head‐to‐tail C(7) hydrogen‐bonded chain substructures commonly associated with 1:1 proton‐transfer hydrogen tartrate salts. These chains are extended into two‐dimensional sheets which, in hydrates (I) and (III) additionally involve the solvent water molecules. Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures are generated via crosslinking through the associative functional groups of the substituted pyridinium cations. In the sheet struture of (I), both water molecules act as donors and acceptors in interactions with separate carboxyl and hydroxy O‐atom acceptors of the primary tartrate chains, closing conjoint cyclic R₄⁴(8), R₃⁴(11) and R₃³(12) associations. Also, in (II) and (III) there are strong cation carboxyl–carboxyl O—H...O hydrogen bonds [O...O = 2.5387 (17) Å in (II) and 2.441 (3) Å in (III)], which in (II) form part of a cyclic R₂²(6) inter‐sheet association. This series of heteroaromatic Lewis base–hydrogen l ‐tartrate salts provides further examples of molecular assembly facilitated by the presence of the classical two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded hydrogen tartrate or hydrogen tartrate–water sheet substructures which are expanded into three‐dimensional frameworks via peripheral cation bifunctional substituent‐group crosslinking interactions.