Pancyclic oriented graphs

Let D be an oriented graph of order n ≧ 9 and minimum degree n ? 2. This paper proves that D is pancyclic if for any two vertices u and v, either uv ? A(D), or d_D⁺(u) + d_D^?(v) ≧ n ? 3.     

Closure Concepts: A Survey

In this paper we survey results of the following type (known as closure results). Let P be a graph property, and let C(u,v) be a condition on two nonadjacent vertices u and v of a graph G. Then G+uv has property P if and only if G has property P. The first and now well-known result of this type was established by Bondy and Chvátal in a paper published in 1976: If u and v are two nonadjacent vertices with degree sum n in a graph G on n vertices, then G+uv is hamiltonian if and only if G is hamiltonian. Based on this result, they defined the n-closure cl_n (G) of a graph G on n vertices as the graph obtained from G by recursively joining pairs of nonadjacent vertices with degree sum n until no such pair remains. They showed that cl_n(G) is well-defined, and that G is hamiltonian if and only if cl_n(G) is hamiltonian. Moreover, they showed that cl_n(G) can be obtained by a polynomial algorithm, and that a Hamilton cycle in cl_n(G) can be transformed into a Hamilton cycle of G by a polynomial algorithm. As a consequence, for any graph G with cl_n(G)=K _n (and n≥3), a Hamilton cycle can be found in polynomial time, whereas this problem is NP-hard for general graphs. All classic sufficient degree conditions for hamiltonicity imply a complete n-closure, so the closure result yields a common generalization as well as an easy proof for these conditions. In their first paper on closures, Bondy and Chvátal gave similar closure results based on degree sum conditions for nonadjacent vertices for other graph properties. Inspired by their first results, many authors developed other closure concepts for a variety of graph properties, or used closure techniques as a tool for obtaining deeper sufficiency results with respect to these properties. Our aim is to survey this progress on closures made in the past (more than) twenty years. Revised: September 27, 1999     

Dirac's Condition for Completely Independent Spanning Trees

Two spanning trees T₁ and T₂ of a graph G are completely independent if, for any two vertices u and v, the paths from u to v in T₁ and T₂ are internally disjoint. In this article, we show two sufficient conditions for the existence of completely independent spanning trees. First, we show that a graph of n vertices has two completely independent spanning trees if the minimum degree of the graph is at least . Then, we prove that the square of a 2‐connected graph has two completely independent spanning trees. These conditions are known to be sufficient conditions for Hamiltonian graphs.     

Sufficient conditions for λ′‐optimality in graphs with girth g

For a connected graph the restricted edge‐connectivity λ′(G) is defined as the minimum cardinality of an edge‐cut over all edge‐cuts S such that there are no isolated vertices in G–S. A graph G is said to be λ′‐optimal if λ′(G) = ξ(G), where ξ(G) is the minimum edge‐degree in G defined as ξ(G) = min{d(u) + d(v) ? 2:uv ∈ E(G)}, d(u) denoting the degree of a vertex u. A. Hellwig and L. Volkmann [Sufficient conditions for λ′‐optimality in graphs of diameter 2, Discrete Math 283 (2004), 113–120] gave a sufficient condition for λ′‐optimality in graphs of diameter 2. In this paper, we generalize this condition in graphs of diameter g ? 1, g being the girth of the graph, and show that a graph G with diameter at most g ? 2 is λ′‐optimal. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 52: 73–86, 2006     

On super edge-antimagic total labelings of

A graph G of order p and size q is called (a,d)-edge-antimagic total if there exists a bijective function f:V(G)E(G)→{1,2,…,p+q} such that the edge-weights w(uv)=f(u)+f(v)+f(uv), uvE(G), form an arithmetic sequence with first term a and common difference d. The graph G is said to be super (a,d)-edge-antimagic total if the vertex labels are 1,2,…,p. In this paper we study super (a,d)-edge-antimagic properties of mK_n, that is, of the graph formed by the disjoint union of m copies of K_n.     

Hamiltonicity of 3-Arc Graphs

An arc of a graph is an oriented edge and a 3-arc is a 4-tuple (v, u, x, y) of vertices such that both (v, u, x) and (u, x, y) are paths of length two. The 3-arc graph of a graph G is defined to have vertices the arcs of G such that two arcs uv, xy are adjacent if and only if (v, u, x, y) is a 3-arc of G. We prove that any connected 3-arc graph is hamiltonian, and all iterative 3-arc graphs of any connected graph of minimum degree at least three are hamiltonian. As a corollary we obtain that any vertex-transitive graph which is isomorphic to the 3-arc graph of a connected arc-transitive graph of degree at least three must be hamiltonian. This confirms the conjecture, for this family of vertex-transitive graphs, that all vertex-transitive graphs with finitely many exceptions are hamiltonian. We also prove that if a graph with at least four vertices is Hamilton-connected, then so are its iterative 3-arc graphs.     

Brooks-type theorems for choosability with separation

We consider the following type of problems. Given a graph G = (V, E) and lists L(v) of allowed colors for its vertices v ∈ V such that |L(v)| = p for all v ∈ V and |L(u) ∩ L(v)| ≤ c for all uv ∈ E, is it possible to find a “list coloring,” i.e., a color f(v) ∈ L(v) for each v ∈ V, so that f(u) ≠ f(v) for all uv ∈ E? We prove that every of maximum degree Δ admits a list coloring for every such list assignment, provided p ≥ . Apart from a multiplicative constant, the result is tight, as lists of length may be necessary. Moreover, for G = K_n (the complete graph on n vertices) and c = 1 (i.e., almost disjoint lists), the smallest value of p is shown to have asymptotics (1 + o(1)) . For planar graphs and c = 1, lists of length 4 suffice. ˜© 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 27: 43–49, 1998     

On integral sum graphs with a saturated vertex

As introduced by F.Harary in 1994, a graph G is said to be an integral sum graph if its vertices can be given a labeling f with distinct integers so that for any two distinct vertices u and v of G, uv is an edge of G if and only if f(u)+f(v) = f(w) for some vertex w in G.     

Mutually Independent Hamiltonian Connectivity of (n, k)-Star Graphs

A graph G is hamiltonian connected if there exists a hamiltonian path joining any two distinct nodes of G. Two hamiltonian paths and of G from u to v are independent if u = u ₁ = v ₁, v = u _v(G) = v _v(G) , and u _i ≠ v _i for every 1 < i < v(G). A set of hamiltonian paths, {P ₁, P ₂, . . . , P _k }, of G from u to v are mutually independent if any two different hamiltonian paths are independent from u to v. A graph is k mutually independent hamiltonian connected if for any two distinct nodes u and v, there are k mutually independent hamiltonian paths from u to v. The mutually independent hamiltonian connectivity of a graph G, IHP(G), is the maximum integer k such that G is k mutually independent hamiltonian connected. Let n and k be any two distinct positive integers with n–k ≥ 2. We use S _n,k to denote the (n, k)-star graph. In this paper, we prove that IHP(S _n,k ) = n–2 except for S _4,2 such that IHP(S _4,2) = 1.      

Extremal Problems for Imbalanced Edges

Albertson [2] has introduced the imbalance of an edge e=uv in a graph G as |d_G(u)−d_G(v)|. If for a graph G of order n and size m the minimum imbalance of an edge of G equals d, then our main result states that with equality if and only if G is isomorphic to We also prove best-possible upper bounds on the number of edges uv of a graph G such that |d_G(u)−d_G(v)|≥d for some given d.     

On the average genus of the random graph

The generalized Petersen graph GP (n, k), n ≤ 3, 1 ≥ k < n/2 is a cubic graph with vertex-set {u_j; i ? Z_n} ∪ {v_j; i ? Z_n}, and edge-set {u_iu_i, u_iv_i, v_iv_{i+k, i?}Z_n}. In the paper we prove that (i) GP(n, k) is a Cayley graph if and only if k² ? 1 (mod n); and (ii) GP(n, k) is a vertex-transitive graph that is not a Cayley graph if and only if k² ? -1 (mod n) or (n, k) = (10, 2), the exceptional graph being isomorphic to the 1-skeleton of the dodecahedon. The proof of (i) is based on the classification of orientable regular embeddings of the n-dipole, the graph consisting of two vertices and n parallel edges, while (ii) follows immediately from (i) and a result of R. Frucht, J.E. Graver, and M.E. Watkins [“The Groups of the Generalized Petersen Graphs,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 70 (1971), pp. 211-218]. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Critères d'induction et de coinduction pour certains anneaux d'opérateurs différentiels

Soit une algèbre de Lie opérant par dérivations sur un anneau local commutatif noethérien (R, ,K=R/ ), et soit V l'anneau des opérateurs différentiels construits à partir de R et . Posons ( )={d /d( ) } et ₀ = ( )/ : ₀ est une algèbre de Lie qui opère sur K par dérivations et l'on peut construire un anneau d'opérateurs différentiels sur K à l'aide de ₀, noté V₀. Grâce au (V₀ − V)-bimodule V/ V on définit l'induction (resp. la coinduction) de V₀ à V par Ind^V_v0=−_v0V/ V (resp. Coind^V_v0=Hom_v0(V/ V,−)) et on donne un critère pour qu'un V-module soit induit (resp. coinduit) à partir de V₀. Ces résultats sont des analogues de ceux, établis par Mackey pour les groupes de Lie et par Blattner pour les algèbres de Lie, analogues, basés sur la notion de système d'imprimitivité.Let be a Lie algebra acting by derivations on a commutative noetherian local ring (R, ,K=R/ ) and let V be the ring of differential operators built on R and . Defining ( )={d /d( ) } et ₀ = ( )/ : ₀ is a Lie algebra which acts on K by derivations, and we can construct a differential operators ring on K with ₀, denoted by V₀. With the help of the (V₀ − V)-bimodule V/ V we define the induction (resp. coinduction) from V₀ to V by Ind^V_v0=−_v0V/ V and we give a criterion for a V-module to be induced (resp. coinduced) from V₀. These results are similar to those established by Mackey for Lie groups and Blattner for Lie algebras, which are based on the notion of the system of imprimitivity.     

The Chartrand-Schuster conjecture: Graphs with unique distance trees are regular

Let G be a finite connected graph with no cut vertex. A distance tree T is a spanning tree of G which further satisfies the condition that for some vertex v, d_G(v, u) = d_T(v, u) for all u, where d_G(v, u) denotes the distance of u from v in the graph G. The conjecture that if all distance trees of G are isomorphic to each other then G is a regular graph, is settled affirmatively. The conjecture was made by Chartrand and Schuster.     

A degree condition for spanning eulerian subgraphs

Let p ≥ 2 be a fixed integer. Let G be a simple and 2-edge-connected graph on n vertices, and let g be the girth of G. If d(u) + d(v) ≥ (2/(g ? 2))((n/p) ? 4 + g) holds whenever uv ? E(G), and if n is sufficiently large compared to p, then either G has a spanning eulerian subgraph or G can be contracted to a graph G₁ of order at most p without a spanning eulerian subgraph. Furthermore, we characterize the graphs that satisfy the conditions above such that G₁ has order p and does not have any spanning eulerian subgraph. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Regular bipartite graphs are antimagic

A labeling of a graph G is a bijection from E(G) to the set {1, 2,… |E(G)|}. A labeling is antimagic if for any distinct vertices u and v, the sum of the labels on edges incident to u is different from the sum of the labels on edges incident to v. We say a graph is antimagic if it has an antimagic labeling. In 1990, Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every connected graph other than K₂ is antimagic. In this article, we show that every regular bipartite graph (with degree at least 2) is antimagic. Our technique relies heavily on the Marriage Theorem. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 60: 173–182, 2009     

On circuits and pancyclic line graphs

Clark proved that L(G) is hamiltonian if G is a connected graph of order n ≥ 6 such that deg u + deg v ≥ n – 1 – p(n) for every edge uv of G, where p(n) = 0 if n is even and p(n) = 1 if n is odd. Here it is shown that the bound n – 1 – p(n) can be decreased to (2n + 1)/3 if every bridge of G is incident with a vertex of degree 1, which is a necessary condition for hamiltonicity of L(G). Moreover, the conclusion that L(G) is hamiltonian can be strengthened to the conclusion that L(G) is pancyclic. Lesniak-Foster and Williamson proved that G contains a spanning closed trail if |V(G)| = n ≥ 6, δ(G) ≥ 2 and deg u + deg v ≥ n – 1 for every pair of nonadjacent vertices u and v. The bound n – 1 can be decreased to (2n + 3)/3 if G is connected and bridgeless, which is necessary for G to have a spanning closed trail.     

Cycles in bipartite graphs and an application in number theory

Let G = G(A, B) be a bipartite graph with |A| = u, |B| = v, and let / be a positive integer. In this paper we prove the following result: If v ≤ u, uv ≤ n, m = |E(G)|, and m ≥ max{180/u, 20/n^{1/2(1+(1/l))},} then G contains a C_2/. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Factorization of operator valued Lp for 0 ≤ p < 1

In [5], it is proved that a bounded linear operator u, from a Banach space Y into an L_p(S, ν) factors through L_p1 (S, ν) for some p₁ > 1, if Y* is of finite cotype; (S, ν) is a probability space for p = 0, and any measure space for 0 < p < 1. In this paper, we generalize this result to uv, where u : Y → L_p(S, ν) and v : X → Y are linear operators such that v* is of finite Ka?in cotype. This result gives also a new proof of Grothendieck's theorem. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

An algebraic characterization of geodetic graphs

We say that a binary operation * is associated with a (finite undirected) graph G (without loops and multiple edges) if * is defined on V(G) and uv E(G) if and only if u v, u * v = v and v * u = u for any u, v V(G). In the paper it is proved that a connected graph G is geodetic if and only if there exists a binary operation associated with G which fulfils a certain set of four axioms. (This characterization is obtained as an immediate consequence of a stronger result proved in the paper).     

A closure concept in factor-critical graphs

A graph G is called n-factor-critical if the removal of every set of n vertices results in a~graph with a~1-factor. We prove the following theorem: Let G be a~graph and let x be a~locally n-connected vertex. Let {u,v} be a~pair of vertices in V(G)−{x} such that uv∉E(G), x∈N_G(u)∩N_G(v), and N_G(x)⊂N_G(u)∪N_G(v)∪{u,v}. Then G is n-factor-critical if and only if G+uv is n-factor-critical.