Applications of solid phase microextraction for the determination of metallic and organometallic species

This paper reviews recent developments of solid phase microextraction (SPME) and its application to the analysis of organometallic species of lead, arsenic, mercury, tin, and selenium by hyphenation with HPLC-GC-atomic spectrometry. In the first part, a background of the technique is given in terms of derivatization, fibers used, extraction and desorption conditions. The second part summarizes typical SPME applications to the determination of organometallic species and the main experimental conditions with the aid of specific examples. Most of the applications comprise alkylation with NaBEt4 and headspace extraction followed by gas chromatographic separation with a suitable detector.     

Recent developments in headspace microextraction techniques for the analysis of environmental contaminants in different matrices

Headspace microextraction procedures such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and single drop microextraction (SDME) or liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) are increasingly used for the extraction of environmental organic pollutants from a variety of aqueous, viscous, semisolid and solid environmental and biological matrices. In this article, recent analytical applications of these methodologies when used as an isolation and trace enrichment step prior to the analysis of organic pollutants (pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated compounds, organotin compounds, phenolic derivatives, aromatic amines, phthalates, etc.) by gas and liquid chromatography are reviewed. The applicability and inherent limitations of headspace microextraction are also discussed. The future direction of research in this field and general trends toward commercial applications are considered.     

固相微萃取萃取头制备技术及试验方法的进展

在阐述固相微萃取的平衡理论及非平衡理论基础上,重点探讨了萃取头的制备技术和相关试验方法的进展。除了介绍商品化通用萃取头的制备技术外,还论述了溶胶-凝胶法、电沉积法、碳素基体吸附法、高温环氧树脂固定法等新的制备技术;探讨了固相微萃取试验方法中萃取模式和萃取头的选择、萃取条件优化以及方法的灵敏度、精度、自动化等的评价;进一步总结了固相微萃取的应用现状,对固相微萃取的发展方向作了展望。     

Recent advances in metal‐organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks for sample preparation and chromatographic analysis

In the field of analytical chemistry, sample preparation and chromatographic separation are two core procedures. The means by which to improve the sensitivity, selectivity and detection limit of a method have become a topic of great interest. Recently, porous organic frameworks, such as metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs), have been widely used in this research area because of their special features, and different methods have been developed. This review summarizes the applications of MOFs and COFs in sample preparation and chromatographic stationary phases. The MOF‐ or COF‐based solid‐phase extraction (SPE), solid‐phase microextraction (SPME), gas chromatography (GC), high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and capillary electrochromatography (CEC) methods are described. The excellent properties of MOFs and COFs have resulted in intense interest in exploring their performance and mechanisms for sample preparation and chromatographic separation.     

固相微萃取与色谱联用方法分析水中12种有机氯化合物

运用顶空固相微萃取与色谱闻用方法（ＨＳ－ＳＰＭＥ－ＧＣ）对水中的残留有机氯化合物进行了分析。对影响ＨＳ－ＳＰＭＥ－ＧＣ分析灵敏度的各种实验因素如涂层种类,萃取温度、平衡时间,离子浓度等进行了讨论并将该方法与固相萃取法（ＳＰＥ）,液液萃取法（ＬＬＥ）作了对比,同时考察了常见环境共存污染物直链烷基苯磺酸钠（ＬＡＳ）对几种方法的影响。     

Use of Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) with Ion Mobility Spectrometry∗

Abstract

We report the use of solid phase microextraction (SPME) combined with ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) for sampling, screening and identification of organic compounds that are readily detected by IMS. This is a new SPME application. SPME has emerged recently as an excellent sample preparation technique for gas chromatography (GC) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). We have found that SPME can be used very conveniently with IMS. An example of SPME-IMS is described using SPME headspace sampling at room temperature with 0.1 mL vials containing 1.0 microgram or less of either cocaine freebase or cocaine hydrochloride. This is followed by analysis using IMS. A hole, drilled in the IMS sample ticket holder, serves as the SPME-IMS interface.

     

Exploiting the versatility of vacuum‐assisted headspace solid‐phase microextraction in combination with the selectivity of ionic liquid‐based GC stationary phases to discriminate Boswellia spp. resins through their volatile and semivolatile fractions

The frankincense resins, secreted from Boswellia species, are an uncommon example of a natural raw material where every class of terpenoids is present in similar proportions. Diterpenoids (serratol, incensole, and incensole acetate) are used to discriminate samples from different species and origins. Headspace solid‐phase microextraction has been used for frankincense analysis, although it requires long sampling time for medium‐ to low‐volatility markers; headspace solid‐phase microextraction under vacuum can overcome this limit. Gas chromatography is used for analysis but the separation of incensole and serratol needs polar stationary phases. In this study, we develop a method to discriminate frankincenses based on vacuum‐assisted headspace solid‐phase microextraction combined with fast gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry with ionic liquid–based stationary phases. The optimized conditions for solid samples were: air evacuation below 0°C, 15 min of incubation time, and 15 min of extraction time. Losses of volatiles due to vial air‐evacuation in the presence of the sample were minimized by sample amount above 100 mg and low sample temperature. Fast gas chromatography provides the baseline separation of all markers in 20 min. By applying vacuum sampling and fast gas chromatography, the total analysis was reduced to 50 min compared to 120 min (60 min sampling plus 60 min analysis) as previously reported. The method was successfully applied to commercial frankincense samples.     

固相微萃取法在环境监测中的应用

固相微萃取技术(SPME)作为一种样品前处理技术,具有方便、快捷、不使用有机溶剂、灵敏、价廉等优点,已被广泛地应用于环境样品的分析。综合评述了采用SPME法对3种环境基质(气态、水体、固态)中的有机物、无机离子等近百余种污染物的监测情况,并对SPME法在环境监测中的应用进行了展望。     

顶空固相微萃取-气相法测定酒中的甲醇和杂醇油

 采用环氧树脂作为固相涂层制作固相微萃取 (SPME)装置 ,建立了顶空固相微萃取 气相法 (HS SPME GC)测定酒精饮料中甲醇和杂醇油的方法 ,并对萃取条件和条件进行了优化。方法的检出限为 0 0 2mg/L～0 0 4mg/L ,相对标准偏差为 1 4 %～ 4 1% ;与顶空气相法相比 ,灵敏度可提高 2 0倍～ 30 0倍。将该法用于啤酒、葡萄酒和保健酒中的甲醇和杂醇油的测定 ,加标回收率为 80 8%～ 110 3% ;与顶空气相法 (国家标准方法 )进行了比较 ,相对误差不大于 7 3%。该法简便、快速、灵敏、精密度好 ,拓宽了SPME的应用范围。     

Solid-phase microextraction in pesticide residue analysis

The applications of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) for sample preparation in pesticide residue analysis are reviewed in this paper taking into account the different approaches of this technique coupled mainly to gas chromatography but also to high-performance liquid chromatography. A complete revision of the existing literature has been made considering the different applications divided according to the pesticide families (organochlorine, organophosphorus, triazines, thiocarbamates, substituted uracils, urea derivatives and dinitroanilines among others) and the sample matrices analysed which included environmental samples (water and soil), food samples and biological fluids. Details on the analytical characteristics of the procedures described in the reviewed papers are given, and new trends in the applications of SPME in this field are discussed.     

固相微萃取-高效液相色谱联用技术的进展

固相微萃取（SPME）技术是近年来发展起来的一种无溶剂,集采样、萃取、浓缩、进样于一体的样品预处理新技术,它与同效液相色谱技术的联用已受到人们的瞩目;该文评述了SPME-HPLC联用技术的进展,并展望这一技术的应用前景。     

Application of solid-phase microextraction in analytical toxicology

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a miniaturized and solvent-free sample preparation technique for chromatographic–spectrometric analysis by which the analytes are extracted from a gaseous or liquid sample by absorption in, or adsorption on, a thin polymer coating fixed to the solid surface of a fiber, inside an injection needle or inside a capillary. In this paper, the present state of practical performance and of applications of SPME to the analysis of blood, urine, oral fluid and hair in clinical and forensic toxicology is reviewed. The commercial coatings for fibers or needles have not essentially changed for many years, but there are interesting laboratory developments, such as conductive polypyrrole coatings for electrochemically controlled SPME of anions or cations and coatings with restricted-access properties for direct extraction from whole blood or immunoaffinity SPME. In-tube SPME uses segments of commercial gas chromatography (GC) capillaries for highly efficient extraction by repeated aspiration–ejection cycles of the liquid sample. It can be easily automated in combination with liquid chromatography but, as it is very sensitive to capillary plugging, it requires completely homogeneous liquid samples. In contrast, fiber-based SPME has not yet been performed automatically in combination with high-performance liquid chromatography. The headspace extractions on fibers or needles (solid-phase dynamic extraction) combined with GC methods are the most advantageous versions of SPME because of very pure extracts and the availability of automatic samplers. Surprisingly, substances with quite high boiling points, such as tricyclic antidepressants or phenothiazines, can be measured by headspace SPME from aqueous samples. The applicability and sensitivity of SPME was essentially extended by in-sample or on-fiber derivatization. The different modes of SPME were applied to analysis of solvents and inhalation narcotics, amphetamines, cocaine and metabolites, cannabinoids, methadone and other opioids, fatty acid ethyl esters as alcohol markers, γ-hydroxybutyric acid, benzodiazepines, various other therapeutic drugs, pesticides, chemical warfare agents, cyanide, sulfide and metal ions. In general, SPME is routinely used in optimized methods for specific analytes. However, it was shown that it also has some capacity for a general screening by direct immersion into urine samples and for pesticides and other semivolatile substance in the headspace mode.     

Recent trends in trace element determination and speciation using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

During the past decade, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) has evolved from a delicate research tool, intended for the well-trained scientist only, into a more robust and well-established analytical technique for trace and ultra-trace element determination, with a few thousand of instruments used worldwide. Despite this immense success, it should be realized that in its ’standard configuration’– i.e. equipped with a pneumatic nebulizer for sample introduction and with a quadrupole filter – ICPMS also shows a number of important limitations and disadvantages: (i) the occurrence of spectral interferences may hamper accurate trace element determination, (ii) solid samples have to be taken into solution prior to analysis and (iii) no information on the ‘chemical form’ in which an element appears can be obtained. Self-evidently, efforts have been and still are made to overcome the aforementioned limitations to the largest possible extent. The application of a double focusing sector field mass spectrometer in ICPMS instrumentation offers a higher mass resolution, such that spectral overlap can be avoided to an important extent. Additionally, in a sector field instrument, photons are efficiently eliminated from the ion beam, resulting in very low background intensities, making it also very well-suited for extreme trace analysis. Also the combination of the ICP as an ion source and a quadrupole filter operated in a so-called ‘alternate’ stability region, an ion trap or a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer allows high(er) mass resolution to be obtained. With modern quadrupole-based instruments, important types of spectral interferences can be avoided by working under ‘cool plasma’ conditions or by applying a collision cell. The use of electrothermal vaporization (ETV) or especially laser ablation (LA) for sample introduction permits direct analysis of solid samples with sufficient accuracy for many purposes. The application range of LA-ICPMS has become very wide and the introduction of UV lasers has led to an improved spatial resolution. Solid sampling ETV-ICPMS on the other hand can be used for some specific applications only, but accurate calibration is more straightforward than with LA-ICPMS. Limited multi-element capabilities, resulting from the transient signals observed with ETV or single shot LA, can be avoided by the use of a time-of-flight (TOF) ICPMS instrument. Finally, when combined with a powerful chromatographic separation technique, an ICP-mass spectrometer can be used as a highly sensitive, element-specific multi-element detector in elemental speciation studies. Especially liquid (HPLC-ICPMS) and – to a lesser extent – gas (GC-ICPMS) chromatography have already been widely used in combination with ICPMS. In speciation work, sample preparation is often observed to be troublesome and this aspect is presently receiving considerable attention. For GC-ICPMS, new sample pretreatment approaches, such as headspace solid phase microextraction (headspace SPME) and the purge-and-trap technique have been introduced. Also supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) show potential to be of use in combination with ICPMS, but so far the application ranges of SFC-ICPMS and CE-ICPMS are rather limited. It is the aim of the present paper to concisely discuss the aforementioned recent ’trends’ in ICPMS, using selected real-life applications reported in the literature.     

Coupling solid-phase microextraction to liquid chromatography. A review

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a technique for extraction of organic compounds from gaseous, aqueous, and solid matrices. SPME is rapid and simple, ideal for automation and for in situ measurements, and no harmful solvents are needed. The principle of SPME involves equilibration of the analytes between the sample matrix and an organic polymeric phase coated on a fused-silica fiber. SPME is traditionally combined with analysis by gas chromatography (GC) and this combination has proved sensitive, accurate, and precise for quantitative analysis of different classes of volatile compound. More recently SPME has been coupled with liquid chromatography to widen its range of application to non-volatile and thermally unstable compounds also. This article reviews the status of SPME coupled with liquid chromatography. It focuses on different applications of the technique, e.g. environmental samples, biological fluids, and food samples, to show that SPME-HPLC has great potential in the analysis of a wide range of compounds in different matrices.     

A review on solid phase microextraction-high performance liquid chromatography as a novel tool for the analysis of toxic metal ions

This paper reviews the practical applications of solid phase microextraction-High performance liquid chromatography in the analysis of toxic metal species as these are important contaminants and are carcinogenic. Their determination in formulations, in feed and food, and in complex environmental matrices (e.g., waste water and industrial effluents) often requires analytical methods capable of high efficiency, unique selectivity, and high sensitivity. Solid phase microextraction (SPME) requires low solvent consumption and is quick in use. SPME is used for extraction and online desorption of analytes with the mobile phase of HPLC and subsequent detection by UV, ICP-MS or ESI-MS as detectors. Different SPME-HPLC methods are summarized in this article to demonstrate the usefulness of this technique for metallic species of As, Cr, Pb, Hg and Se.     

The recent developments in dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for preconcentration and determination of inorganic analytes

Recently, increasing interest on the use of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) developed in 2006 by Rezaee has been found in the field of separation science. DLLME is miniaturized format of liquid–liquid extraction in which acceptor-to-donor phase ratio is greatly reduced compared with other methods. In the present review, the combination of DLLME with different analytical techniques such as atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), gas chromatography (GC), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for preconcentration and determination of inorganic analytes in different types of samples will be discussed. Recent developments in DLLME, e.g., displacement-DLLME, the use of an auxiliary solvent for adjustment of density of extraction mixture, and the application of ionic liquid-based DLLME in determination of inorganic species even in the presence of high content of salts are presented in the present review. Finally, comparison of DLLME with the other liquid-phase microextraction approaches and limitations of this technique are provided.     

金属有机骨架复合材料在样品预处理中的研究进展

金属有机骨架（MOFs）材料是近几年涌现出的一类新型多功能多孔材料,以金属离子或金属簇为配位中心,与含氧或氮的有机配体通过配位作用形成多孔骨架结构。相比于其他传统无机多孔材料,MOFs具有比表面积高、孔隙率大、热稳定性好和结构与功能多样化的特点,因而被广泛用于气体存储、催化、吸附和分离等领域。MOFs复合材料在样品预处理方面的应用引起了研究者们的极大兴趣和广泛关注。由于MOFs材料和不同功能材料如高分子聚合物、碳基材料以及磁性材料组装复合,使MOFs复合材料的性能优于原来的MOFs材料。综述了近年MOFs复合材料在样品预处理的研究应用,尤其是在固相微萃取、固相萃取以及磁性固相萃取等方面的应用。     

Analytical microextraction: current status and future trends

Analytical microextractions, defined as nonexhaustive sample preparation with a very small volume of extracting phase (microliter range or smaller) relative to the sample volume, represent an important development in the field of analytical chemistry. Analytes are extracted by a small volume of a solid or semi-solid polymeric material, as in solid-phase microextraction (SPME), or alternatively by a small volume of a liquid, as in liquid-phase microextraction (LPME). This paper gives an overview of the SPME and LPME techniques and discusses future trends. This includes a discussion of the different extraction formats available, commercial equipment, method transfer from traditional sample preparation methods to microextraction, and performance as well as robustness for the latter type of systems. In addition, the paper contains a unified approach to the understanding of extraction thermodynamics and kinetics applicable to both SPME and LPME.     

Desorption electrospray ionisation mass spectrometric analysis of chemical warfare agents from solid‐phase microextraction fibers

Desorption electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (DESI‐MS) was recently reported for the direct analysis of sample media without the need for additional sample handling. During the present study, direct analysis of solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) fibers by DESI‐MS/MS was evaluated with indoor office media that might be collected during a forensic investigation, including wall surfaces, office fabrics, paper products and Dacron swabs used for liquid sampling. Media spiked at the µg/g level with purified chemical warfare agents and a complex munitions grade sample of tabun, to simulate the quality of chemical warfare agent that might be used for terrorist purposes, were successfully analysed by DESI‐MS/MS. Sulfur mustard, a compound that has not been successfully analysed by electrospray mass spectrometry in the past, was also sampled using a SPME fiber and analysed for the first time by DESI‐MS/MS. Finally, the overall analytical approach involving SPME headspace sampling and DESI‐MS analysis was evaluated during a scenario‐based training live agent exercise. A sarin sample collected by the military was analysed and confirmed by DESI‐MS in a mobile laboratory under realistic field conditions. Copyright © 2007 Crown in the right of Canada. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.