Understandings of Solutions to Differential Equations Through Contexts,Web‐Based Simulations,and Student Discussion

As in the case of elementary mathematics, the instruction of high‐level mathematical concepts can often be sacrificed at the expense of a focus on algorithmic procedures. Computer‐based simulations can expand an undergraduate mathematics instructor's opportunity to explore high‐level mathematical concepts in an applied environment. This study describes one instructor's approach to incorporating simulations and classroom discussions in a differential equations course and the subsequent effects on student learning attitudes and outcomes. Students made modest gains in the area of conceptualizing and applying ideas regarding solutions to differential equations in this learning environment. Implications of the study include the identification of specific gains relative to computer‐mediated learning environments and recommendations for using simulations to support conceptual development.     

Students Explaining Solutions in Student-Directed Groups: Cooperative Learning and Reform in Mathematics Education

Cooperative learning experiences can contribute to mathematics education reform by stimulating student communication. Sixth grade student conversations were recorded on four occasions over a four month period when they were working in cooperative groups. The results indicated that routine compliance with the requirement to “explain” superseded authentic dialogues about mathematical ideas. Student conversations were influenced by the model of explanation exchanges emerging from the teacher's visits to groups. Teacher influence was mediated by students' past experiences. The findings suggest that teachers implementing reform should help students develop criteria for judging mathematical arguments and confront student conceptions directly to deepen debates.     

Exploring the Use of New Representations as a Resource for Teacher Learning

An important goal of mathematics education reform is to support teacher learning. Toward this end, researchers and teacher educators have investigated ways in which teachers learn about mathematical content, pedagogical strategies, and student thinking as they implement reform. This study extends such work by examining how one elementary school and one high school teacher learned from students' interpretations of new conceptually based representations contained in instructional materials aligned with the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics ( National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000 ). Results indicated that teaching with new representations provided a rich context for teacher learning at both the elementary and high school level, and three dimensions were identified along which such learning occurred. The results suggest that pedagogical content knowledge with respect to representations is an important facet of teacher cognition that should be studied in greater depth.     

Analyzing Student Work as a Professional Development Activity

When worthwhile mathematical tasks are used in classrooms, they should also become a crucial element of assessment. For teachers, using these tasks in classrooms requires a different way to analyze student thinking than the traditional assessment model. Looking carefully at students' written work on worthwhile mathematical tasks and listening carefully while students explore these worthwhile tasks can contribute to a teacher's professional development. This paper reports on a professional development activity in which teachers analyzed mathematical tasks, predicted students' achievement on tasks, evaluated students' written work, listened to students' reasoning, and assessed students' understanding. Teachers' engagement in this way can help them develop flexibility and proficiency in the evaluation of their own students' work. These experiences allow teachers the opportunity to recognize students' potential, strengthen their own mathematical understanding, and engage in conversations with peers about assessment and instruction.     

Contrasting Cases of Calculus Students' Understanding of Derivative Graphs

This study adds momentum to the ongoing discussion clarifying the merits of visualization and analysis in mathematical thinking. Our goal was to gain understanding of three calculus students' mental processes and images used to create meaning for derivative graphs. We contrast the thinking processes of these three students as they attempted to sketch antiderivative graphs when presented with derivative graphs. These students constructed different and idiosyncratic images and representations leading to different understandings of derivative graphs. Our results suggest that the two students whose cognitive preferences were strongly visual or analytic and who did not synthesize visual and analytic thinking experienced different difficulties associated with their preferred modes for mathematical representation and thinking. Even the student who did synthesize these modes to some extent, to good effect, experienced difficulty when he did not do so. We discuss pedagogical implications for these results in a final section.     

Teachers' Considerations of Students' Thinking During Mathematics Lesson Design

Teachers' abilities to design mathematics lessons are related to their capability to mobilize resources to meeting intended learning goals based on their noticing. In this process, knowing how teachers consider Students' thinking is important for understanding how they are making decisions to promote student learning. While teaching, what teachers notice influences their decision‐making process. This article explores the mathematics lesson planning practices of four 4th‐grade teachers at the same school to understand how their consideration of Students' learning influences planning decisions. Case study methodology was used to gain an in‐depth perspective of the mathematics planning practices of the teachers. Results indicate the teachers took varying approaches in how they considered students. One teacher adapted instruction based on Students' conceptual understanding, two teachers aimed at producing skill‐efficient students, and the final teacher regulated learning with a strict adherence to daily lessons in curriculum materials, with little emphasis on student understanding. These findings highlight the importance of providing professional development support to teachers focused on their noticing and considerations of Students' mathematical understandings as related to learning outcomes. These findings are distinguished from other studies because of the focus on how teachers consider Students' thinking during lesson planning. This article features a Research to Practice Companion Article . Please click on the supporting information link below to access.     

Writing as a Tool to Demonstrate Mathematical Understanding

In this study, I examine how using a writers' workshop model in mathematics creates a space for students to write about their mathematical thinking and problem solving and how their writing impacts instruction. This case study of one classroom with one teacher spanned 6 weeks and included 18 implementations of an adapted version of the Writers' Workshop (WW) in a fourth‐grade mathematics class. On a biweekly basis, the data were reviewed and changes made to the model. The analysis of the students' writing revealed (a) their understandings and misunderstandings of the mathematical content, (b) their readiness for more challenging tasks, and (c) their connections to prior knowledge. Students used writing to demonstrate their understanding of mathematics and show their mathematical processes. In some cases, examining only the numerical work failed to illuminate the students' understanding, their writing provided deeper insight. Students recognized writing as a tool for learning; this was evident in interview responses.     

What does it mean to critique? An exploration of the types of critiques promoted in seventh-grade mathematics curriculum and assessment materials

While research in mathematics education has shown that mathematics assessments are highly consequential, traditional assessments often lag behind advancements in instructional methods. One such advancement is the promotion of mathematical habits of mind such as students' abilities to critique others' reasoning. This study explored the use of student work embedded in seventh-grade curriculum-based mathematics assessment tasks as a mechanism for critiquing others' thinking. The researcher investigated the prevalence and nature of student work in assessment tasks as compared to textbook tasks from five seventh-grade, Common Core State Standards for Mathematics-aligned curriculum series. The text analyses findings revealed that while there were multiple critique types in student work across both assessment and textbook tasks, there were substantial differences between students' opportunities to make sense of someone else's mathematical thinking in curriculum-based assessments as compared to the student textbooks. These findings reinforced prior curriculum and assessment research that found assessment often lags behind instructional methods.     

The Impact of Professional Noticing on Teachers' Adaptations of Challenging Tasks

This study investigates how teacher attention to student thinking informs adaptations of challenging tasks. Five teachers who had implemented challenging mathematics curriculum materials for three or more years were videotaped enacting instructional sequences and were subsequently interviewed about those enactments. The results indicate that the two teachers who attended closely to student thinking developed conjectures about how that thinking developed across instructional sequences and used those conjectures to inform their adaptations. These teachers connected their conjectures to the details of student strategies, leading to adaptations that enhanced task complexity and students' opportunity to engage with mathematical concepts. By contrast, the three teachers who evaluated students' thinking primarily as right or wrong regularly adapted tasks in ways that were poorly informed by their observations and that reduced the complexity of the tasks. The results suggest that forming communities of inquiry around the use of challenging curriculum materials is important for providing opportunities for students to learn with understanding.     

Understanding How Students Develop Mathematical Models

in this article, we discuss findings from a research study designed to characterize students' development of significant mathematical models by examining the shifts in their thinking that occur during problem investigations. These problem investigations were designed to elicit the development of mathematical models that can be used to describe and explain the relations, patterns, and structure found in data from experienced situations. We were particularly interested in a close examination of the student interactions that appear to foster the development of such mathematical models. This classroom-based qualitative case study was conducted with precalculus students enrolled in a moderate-sized private research university. We observed several groups of 3 students each as they worked together on 5 different modeling tasks. In each task, the students were asked to create a quantitative system that could describe and explain the patterns and structures in an experienced situation and that could be used to make predictions about the situation. Our analysis of the data revealed 4 sources of mismatches that were significant in bringing about the occurrence of shifts in student thinking: conjecturing, questioning, impasses to progress, and the use of technology-based representations. The shifts in thinking in turn led to the development of mathematical models. These results suggest that students would benefit from learning environments that provide them with ample opportunity to express their ideas, ask questions, make reasoned guesses, and work with technology while engaging in problem situations that elicit the development of significant mathematical models.     

Attributes of Instances of Student Mathematical Thinking that Are Worth Building on in Whole-Class Discussion

This study investigated attributes of 278 instances of student mathematical thinking during whole-class interactions that were identified as having high potential, if made the object of discussion, to foster learners’ understanding of important mathematical ideas. Attributes included the form of the thinking (e.g., question vs. declarative statement), whether the thinking was based on earlier work or generated in the moment, the accuracy of the thinking, and the type of thinking (e.g., sense-making). Findings illuminate the complexity of identifying student thinking worth building on during whole-class discussion and provide insight into important attributes of these high potential instances that could be used to help teachers more easily recognize them. Implications for researching, learning, and enacting the teaching practice of building on student mathematical thinking are discussed.     

What Students Say About Their Mathematical Thinking When They Listen

Mathematical listening is an important aspect of mathematical communication. Yet there are relatively few examinations of this phenomenon. Further, existing studies of students' mathematical listening come from observational data, lacking the student perspective. This study examined student replies to an open‐response question regarding what happens to their thinking about mathematics when they listen to their peers' mathematical talk. Results suggest varying ways of listening that range from more passive to more active forms. While relationships were observed between ways of listening and perceived forms of engaging in mathematical discussion, no relationship was observed with the frequency with which students reported participating in discussions.     

Mathematics in Children's Thinking

The human mind inevitably comprehends the world in mathematical terms (among others). Children's informal and invented mathematics contains on an implicit level many of the mathematical ideas that teachers want to promote on a formal and explicit level. These ideas may be innate, constructed for the purpose of adaptation, or picked up from an environment that is rich in mathematical structure, regardless of culture. Teachers should attempt to uncover the mathematical ideas contained in their students' thinking because much, but not all, of the mathematics curriculum is immanent in children's informal and invented knowledge. This mathematical perspective requires a focus not only on the child's constructive process but also on the mathematical content underlying the child's thinking. Teachers then can use these crude ideas as a foundation on which to construct a significant portion of classroom pedagogy. In doing this, teachers should recognize that children's invented strategies are not an end in themselves. Instead, the ultimate goal is to facilitate children's progressive mathematization of their immanent ideas. Children need to understand mathematics in deep, formal, and conventional ways.     

How do they know it is a parallelogram? Analysing geometric discourse at van Hiele Level 3

In this article, we introduce Sfard's discursive framework and use it to investigate prospective teachers' geometric discourse in the context of quadrilaterals. In particular, we focus on describing and analysing two participants' use of mathematical words and substantiation routines related to parallelograms and their properties at van Hiele level 3 thinking. Our findings suggest that a single van Hiele level of thinking encompasses a range of complexity of reasoning and differences in discourse and thus a deeper investigation of students' mathematical thinking within assigned van Hiele levels is warranted.     

What Matters Most: A Comparison of Expert and Novice Teachers' Noticing of Mathematics Classroom Events

In this study, we examined 10 expert and 10 novice teachers' noticing of classroom events in China. It was found that both expert and novice teachers, who were selected from two cities in China, highly attended to developing students' mathematics knowledge coherently and developing students' mathematical thinking and ability; they also paid attention to students' self‐exploratory learning, students' participation, and teachers' instructional skills. Furthermore, compared with novice teachers, expert teachers paid greater attention to developing mathematical and high‐order thinking, and developing mathematics knowledge coherently, but paid less attention to teachers' guidance. Moreover, we further illustrated the qualitative differences and similarities in their noticing of classroom events. Finally, we discussed the findings and relevant implications.     

Local Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics Education

This article focuses on a form of instructional design that is deemed fitting for reform mathematics education. Reform mathematics education requires instruction that helps students in developing their current ways of reasoning into more sophisticated ways of mathematical reasoning. This implies that there has to be ample room for teachers to adjust their instruction to the students' thinking. But, the point of departure is that if justice is to be done to the input of the students and their ideas built on, a well-founded plan is needed. Design research on an instructional sequence on addition and subtraction up to 100 is taken as an instance to elucidate how the theory for realistic mathematics education (RME) can be used to develop a local instruction theory that can function as such a plan. Instead of offering an instructional sequence that "works," the objective of design research is to offer teachers an empirically grounded theory on how a certain set of instructional activities can work. The example of addition and subtraction up to 100 is used to clarify how a local instruction theory informs teachers about learning goals, instructional activities, student thinking and learning, and the role of tools and imagery.     

Instructional Supports for Representational Fluency in Solving Linear Equations with Computer Algebra Systems and Paper‐and‐Pencil

This research addresses the issue of how to support students' representational fluency—the ability to create, move within, translate across, and derive meaning from external representations of mathematical ideas. The context of solving linear equations in a combined computer algebra system (CAS) and paper‐and‐pencil classroom environment is targeted as a rich and pressing context to study this issue. We report results of a collaborative teaching experiment in which we designed for and tested a functions approach to solving equations with ninth‐grade algebra students, and link to results of semi‐structured interviews with students before and after the experiment. Results of analyzing the five‐week experiment include instructional supports for students' representational fluency in solving linear equations: (a) sequencing the use of graphs, tables, and CAS feedback prior to formal symbolic transpositions, (b) connecting solutions to equations across representations, and (c) encouraging understanding of equations as equivalence relations that are sometimes, always, or never true. While some students' change in sophistication of representational fluency helps substantiate the productive nature of these supports, other students' persistent struggles raise questions of how to address the diverse needs of learners in complex learning environments involving multiple tool‐based representations.