Large-scale pesticide testing in olives by liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry using two sample preparation methods based on matrix solid-phase dispersion and QuEChERS

In this work we have evaluated the performance of two sample preparation methodologies for the large-scale multiresidue analysis of pesticides in olives using liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The tested sample treatment methodologies were: (1) liquid–liquid partitioning with acetonitrile followed by dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up using GCB, PSA and C₁₈ sorbents (QuEChERS method – modified for fatty vegetables) and (2) matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) using aminopropyl as sorbent material and a final clean-up performed in the elution step using Florisil. An LC–MS/MS method covering 104 multiclass pesticides was developed to examine the performance of these two protocols. The separation of the compounds from the olive extracts was achieved using a short C₁₈ column (50 mm × 4.6 mm i.d.) with 1.8 μm particle size. The identification and confirmation of the compounds was based on retention time matching along with the presence (and ratio) of two typical MRM transitions. Limits of detection obtained were lower than 10 μg kg⁻¹ for 89% analytes using both sample treatment protocols. Recoveries studies performed on olives samples spiked at two concentration levels (10 and 100 μg kg⁻¹) yielded average recoveries in the range 70–120% for most analytes when QuEChERS procedure is employed. When MSPD was the choice for sample extraction, recoveries obtained were in the range 50–70% for most of target compounds. The proposed methods were successfully applied to the analysis of real olives samples, revealing the presence of some of the target species in the μg kg⁻¹ range. Besides the evaluation of the sample preparation approaches, we also discuss the use of advanced software features associated to MRM method development that overcome several limitations and drawbacks associated to MS/MS methods (time segments boundaries, tedious method development/manual scheduling and acquisition limitations). This software feature recently offered by different vendors is based on an algorithm that associates retention time data for each individual MS/MS transition, so that the number of simultaneously traced transitions throughout the entire chromatographic run (dwell times and sensitivity) is maximized.     

High throughput analysis of 150 pesticides in fruits and vegetables using QuEChERS and low-pressure gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry

A higher monitoring rate is highly desirable in the labs, but this goal is typically limited by sample throughput. In this study, we sought to assess the real-world applicability of fast, low-pressure GC–time-of-flight MS (LP-GC/TOFMS) for the identification and quantification of 150 pesticides in tomato, strawberry, potato, orange, and lettuce samples. Buffered and unbuffered versions of QuEChERS (which stands for “quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe”) using dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) and disposable pipette extraction (DPX) for clean-up were compared for sample preparation. For clean-up of all sample types, a combination of 150 mg MgSO₄, 50 mg primary secondary amine (PSA), 50 mg C₁₈, and 7.5 mg graphitized carbon black (GCB) per mL extract was used. No significant differences were observed in the results between the different sample preparation versions. QuEChERS took <10 min per individual sample, or <1 h for two chemists to prepare 32 pre-homogenized samples, and using LP-GC/TOFMS, <10 min run time and <15 min cycle time allowed >32 injections in 8 h. Overall, >126 analytes gave recoveries (3 spiking levels) in the range of 70–120% with <20% RSD. The results indicate that LP-GC/TOFMS for GC-amenable analytes matches UHPLC–MS/MS in terms of sample throughput and turnaround time for their routine, concurrent use in the analysis of a wide range of analytes in QuEChERS extracts to achieve reliable quantification and identification of pesticide residues in foods.     

Simultaneous extraction and clean-up of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polychlorinated biphenyls from sheep liver tissue by selective pressurized liquid extraction and analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

We describe a selective pressurized liquid extraction (SPLE) method, followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), for the simultaneous extraction and clean-up of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in sheep liver tissue samples. The on-line clean-up of liver tissue by SPLE was tested using differing amount of acid-modified silica (sulphuric acid:silica gel, 1:2, w/w), the most effective amount being 20 g. Different extraction solvents (iso-hexane and dichloromethane), either alone or in various combinations, were used to extract these target compounds from spiked liver samples. Variables affecting the SPLE extraction efficiency, including temperature, pressure, number of extraction cycles and static extraction time were studied; the optimum parameters were 80 °C, 10.3 MPa, 2 cycles and 5 min, respectively. The SPLE based method was compared with more traditional Soxhlet, off-line PLE, ultrasonic and heating extraction methods. Overall the mean percentage recoveries for all target chemicals using SPLE were 86–103% (n = 3, SD < 9%), and compared favourably with the Soxhlet (63–109%, n = 3, SD < 8%), off-line PLE (82–104%, n = 3, SD < 18%), ultrasonic (86–99%, n = 3, SD < 11%) and heating (72–102%, n = 3, SD < 21%) extraction methods. The limits of detection of the proposed method were 5–96 pg g⁻¹ and 2–29 pg g⁻¹ for the different PBDE and PCB chemicals studied, respectively. The outputs of the proposed method were linear over the range from 0.02 to 30 ng g⁻¹, for all PCB and PBDE congeners except for PBDE 100 and 153 (0.05–30 ng g⁻¹) and PBDE 183 (0.1–30 ng g⁻¹). The method was successfully applied to sheep liver samples for the determination of the target PBDE and PCB compounds.     

Analytical methods for pesticide residues in rice

Rice consumption has increased worldwide over recent decades, as it has become one of the most common foods. Although the analysis of environmental samples coming from rice areas has been well documented, there is less information regarding the analysis of pesticide residues in rice-grain samples.Rice (paddy, brown and white) can be considered a complex matrix, leading to difficulties in the application of the different multiresidue methods described in the literature. This review addresses and compares the principal extraction and clean-up methodologies [e.g., liquid-liquid extraction, solid-phase extraction, pressurized-liquid extraction, QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe), gel-permeation chromatography and supercritical-fluid extraction - with QuEChERS-based methods being the most frequently employed].Traditionally, the determination of pesticide residues in rice has been based on gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (MS). But the application of new classes of pesticides has driven laboratories to increase the use of liquid chromatography with tandem MS. The limits of detection and quantification are in the ranges 0.09-90 μg/kg and 1-297 μg/kg, respectively, for the methodologies reported. These values agree with the current internationally-accepted maximum residue limits (MRLs).Based on the European Union (EU) database, more than 3000 analyses of pesticide residues in rice have been performed by official EU laboratories over the past decade. Of these, 6% reported pesticide residues above the MRLs.Physico-chemical properties can explain the occurrence of pesticides in rice commodities: lipophilic pesticides are frequently found in brown rice, whereas fungicides are mainly found in milled rice. Carbendazim, malathion, iprodione, tebuconazole, quinclorac and tricyclazole are the pesticides most frequently found in white rice, while buprofezin, hexaconazole, chlorpyrifos and edifenphos are most commonly found in paddy rice.Pesticide-residue concentrations can be affected during rice processing - with concentrations generally lower in the final products. However, few studies focusing on primary processing have addressed the setting of precise values applicable for the processing factors.     

Simultaneous determination of pesticides, biopesticides and mycotoxins in organic products applying a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe extraction procedure and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

A method for the simultaneous determination of pesticides, biopesticides and mycotoxins from organic products was developed. Extraction of more than 90 compounds was evaluated and performed by using a modified QuEChERS-based (acronym of Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe) sample preparation procedure. The method was based on a single extraction with acidified acetonitrile, followed by partitioning with salts, avoiding any clean-up step prior the determination by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS). Validation studies were carried out in wheat, cucumber and red wine as representative matrixes. Recoveries of the spiked samples were in the range between 70 and 120% (with intra-day precision, expressed as relative standard deviation, lower than 20%) for most of the analysed compounds, except picloram and quinmerac. Inter-day precision, expressed as relative standard deviation, was lower than 24%. Limits of quantification were lower than 10 μg kg⁻¹ and the developed method was successfully applied to the analysis of organic food products, detecting analytes belonging to the three types of compounds.     

A Validated Method for the Determination of Neonicotinoid,Pyrethroid and Organochlorine Residues in Human Milk

Exposure to pesticides in the environment is sensitively indicated by the concentration of these chemicals in human milk. However, to the best of our knowledge, detection methods in human milk for the relatively new class of pesticides, neonicotinoids, are yet to be validated. We developed a method of detection of neonicotinoids in human milk, together with two other classes of pesticides, pyrethroids and organochlorines. Neonicotinoids and pyrethroids are emerging pesticides that are replacing older and more persistent chemicals such as organochlorines. We optimized a procedure for extraction of these chemicals from whole milk and report our solutions to the problems of interference by co-extracted substances. The clean-up method was optimized using a minimum amount of PSA (50 mg) and MgSO₄ (150 mg). This was followed by GC–MS/MS analysis (for organochlorines and pyrethroids) and LC–MS/MS (for neonicotinoids). The method was validated following SANTE/11945/2015 guidelines at concentrations 10, 20 and 100 ng g^?1. Limits of quantification were obtained at ≤ 2 ng g^?1 for all pesticides and lowest validated level were 10 ng g^?1, with measurement uncertainty between 0.47 and 2.6 ng g^?1. Average recovery ranged from 84 to 102% and for most compounds was found to be more satisfactory than the original QuEChERS, AOAC 2007.01 acetate buffer method and modified QuEChERS methods. The relative standard deviation was less than 16%. The method was successfully utilized for the analysis of human milk samples from Nadia, West Bengal and was found positive for organochlorines and negative for neonicotinoids and pyrethroids.     

Development of an improved method to extract pesticide residues in foods using acetonitrile with magnesium sulfate and chloroform

A multiresidue method was developed based on extraction of 10 g sample with 10 mL acetonitrile and subsequent liquid–liquid partitioning formed by adding 4 g MgSO₄ plus 1 mL chloroform. During the partitioning process, the extraction recoveries of polar analytes were found to be essentially determined by the acetonitrile content in the aqueous phase. The use of MgSO₄ gave the least acetonitrile left in the aqueous phase (lower than 5%) and thus promoting complete partitioning of analytes into the organic phase. At the same time, removal of water from the acetonitrile phase was achieved by adding only a small amount of chloroform with no influence on the acetonitrile content in the aqueous phase, thus leading to decreasing the co-extraction of polar matrix components. The most complete mutual separation of acetonitrile and water was achieved by the joint use of MgSO₄ and chloroform and thus the optimal extraction recovery and analytical selectivity were obtained simultaneously. The new method, with higher recoveries of polar analytes, better analytical selectivity and simpler manipulation, is a claimed improvement to the original QuEChERS method. The proposed method was finally validated by the determination of 20 pesticides in a mixed food matrix by using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrum (LC–MS/MS). Acceptable linearity, sensitivity, recovery, precision and selectivity results were obtained.     

Determination of type A and type B trichothecenes in paprika and chili pepper using LC-triple quadrupole-MS and GC-ECD

There is a need to develop sensitive and accurate analytical methods for determining deoxynivalenol (DON), HT-2 toxin and T-2 toxin in paprika to properly assess the relevant risk of human exposure. An optimized analytical method for determination of HT-2 toxin and T-2 toxin using capillary gas chromatography with electron capture detection and another method for determination of DON by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in paprika was developed. The method for determination of HT-2 toxin and T-2 toxin that gave the best recoveries involved extraction of the sample with acetonitrile-water (84:16, v/v), clean-up by solid-phase extraction on a cartridge made of different sorbent materials followed by a further clean-up in immunoaffinity column that was specific for the two toxins. The solvent was changed and the eluate was derivatized with pentafluoropropionic anhydride and injected into the GC system. The limits of detection (LOD) for T-2 and HT-2 toxins were 7 and 3 μg/kg, respectively, and the recovery rates for paprika spiked with 1000 μg toxin/kg were 71.1% and 80.1% for HT-2 and T-2 toxins, respectively. For DON determination, the optimized method consisted of extraction with acetonitrile-water (84:16, v/v) solution followed by a solid-phase extraction clean-up process in a cartridge made of different sorbent compounds. After solvent evaporation in N₂ stream, the residue was dissolved and DON was separated and determined by LC-MS/MS. The LOD for this method was 14 μg DON/kg paprika sample and the DON recovery rate was 86.8%.     

An evaluation method for determination of non-polar pesticide residues in animal fat samples by using dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up and GC-MS

A rapid and easy method has been proposed, optimized and evaluated for quantitative determination at trace level of a representative group of non-polar pesticides in fat samples. The method includes n-hexane-saturated acetonitrile extraction, fat precipitation by cooling pre clean-up followed by dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) based on QuEChERS procedure clean-up. Determination was performed by gas chromatography?Cmass spectrometry (GC-MS) in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. Efficiency of the d-SPE clean-up step was evaluated by comparison with fat oxidation treatment and gel permeation chromatography. Different combinations of d-SPE extraction reagents and sample amounts were tested in order to minimize matrix co-extractives and interferences. Best recoveries were obtained with 1200?mg of MgSO₄, 400?mg of end-capped C₁₈, 400?mg of PSA and 1?g of sample amount. SIM method, matrix effect, precision, and accuracy were evaluated with spiked pork fat samples for 38 representative pesticides. Results of this study showed that this technique is applicable in routine analysis for its application into monitoring programs. It simplifies time-consuming clean-up steps and allows a satisfactory long-term chromatographic performance.     

Multi-class,multi-residue analysis of pesticides,polychlorinated biphenyls,polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,polybrominated diphenyl ethers and novel flame retardants in fish using fast,low-pressure gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

A multi-class, multi-residue method for the analysis of 13 novel flame retardants, 18 representative pesticides, 14 polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners, 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and 7 polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) congeners in catfish muscle was developed and evaluated using fast low pressure gas chromatography triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (LP-GC/MS–MS). The method was based on a QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) extraction with acetonitrile and dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) clean-up with zirconium-based sorbent prior to LP-GC/MS–MS analysis. The developed method was evaluated at 4 spiking levels and further validated by analysis of NIST Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) 1974B and 1947. Sample preparation for a batch of 10 homogenized samples took about 1 h/analyst, and LP-GC/MS–MS analysis provided fast separation of multiple analytes within 9 min achieving high throughput. With the use of isotopically labeled internal standards, recoveries of all but one analyte were between 70 and 120% with relative standard deviations less than 20% (n = 5). The measured values for both SRMs agreed with certified/reference values (72–119% accuracy) for the majority of analytes. The detection limits were 0.1–0.5 ng g⁻¹ for PCBs, 0.5–10 ng g⁻¹ for PBDEs, 0.5–5 ng g⁻¹ for select pesticides and PAHs and 1–10 ng g⁻¹ for flame retardants. The developed method was successfully applied for analysis of catfish samples from the market.     

Pressurized solvent extraction followed by gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry for the determination of benzotriazole light stabilizers in indoor dust

A novel and sensitive method for the determination of five benzotriazole compounds (commonly used as light stabilizers) in indoor dust is presented. Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and gas chromatography followed by tandem in time mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) were used as sample preparation and determination techniques, respectively. Extraction and clean-up were integrated on-line and, after an evaporative concentration step, the extract provided by the PLE instrument was injected directly in the GC–MS/MS system. Parameters affecting the performance of the sample preparation process were evaluated using experimental factorial designs. Under optimized conditions, analytes were recovered from 0.5 g samples in 3 static extraction cycles of 10 min, using a hexane:dichloromethane (7:3) mixture, at 90 °C. Silica (1 g) was placed in the bottom of the extraction cells as clean-up sorbent. The recoveries of the method varied from 82 to 122%, with standard deviations below 13. The inter-day precision ranged from 9 to 12%, and the limits of quantification (LOQs) remained below 10 ng g⁻¹ for all species. For the first time, four of the five investigated species were found in dust from indoor environments. Their mean concentrations ranged from 71 to 780 ng g⁻¹.     

Comparison of Different Sorbents in the QuEChERS Method for the Determination of Pesticide Residues in Strawberries by LC–MS/MS

A comparison of sample preparation based on the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) method for analysis of pesticide residues in strawberries by LC–MS/MS was made using different sorbents in the clean-up by dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE). Some sorbents were laboratory-made, prepared by depositing poly(methyloctadecylsiloxane) (PMODS), poly(methyloctylsiloxane) (PMOS), aminopropyl-terminated poly(dimethylsiloxane) (APPS) and copolymer of (52–48 %)dimethyl-(48–52 %)methylphenyl-siloxane (DMMPS) onto silica supports. The commercial sorbent primary–secondary amine (PSA) and mixtures of two sorbents, primary–secondary amine and poly(methyloctadecylsiloxane), were also used in the experiments. The performances of the sorbents were evaluated by parameters such as color of the final extract, gravimetric measurement, recovery and matrix effect at the fortification level of 100 ng g^?1 of the pesticide mixture in strawberries. The recoveries were in the range 70–120 %, and the RSD values were lower than 20 % for most of the pesticides using the modified QuEChERS method with different sorbents in the clean-up step. The strawberry extracts were cleaned more efficiently with the use of primary–secondary amine sorbent, which has the function of removing sugars, organic acids and especially pigments. The sample preparation method was efficient, and LC–MS/MS determination was optimal because of high selectivity and good detectivity for the multiresidue analyses.     

Rapid determination of residual pesticides in tobacco by the quick,easy, cheap,effective, rugged,and safe sample pretreatment method coupled with LC–MS

A quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) sample pretreatment method coupled with LC–MS was developed for the determination of 11 pesticides in tobacco. Sample pretreatment parameters and instrumental parameters of LC–MS were investigated, and the optimal conditions were selected. Under the optimized conditions, the 11 pesticides were detected simultaneously with a good linear relationship (r² = 0.9993–0.9999) and high precisions (less than 5% of the RSD of peak areas). The LODs were in the range of 0.1–5.0 μg/L. Compared with SPE clean‐up, QuEChERS greatly simplified the sample pretreatment with simple solvent extraction system. After QuEChERS pretreatment, no serious matrix effects were observed. Used for the analysis of real samples, metalaxyl was found in cigarette and tobacco samples at 63.47 and 132.27 ng/g, respectively. The recoveries for 11 pesticides were in the range of 70.03–118.69%, and RSDs were less than 10%. The proposed method is simple, low cost, and has good reproducibility.     

Simultaneous analysis of 70 pesticides using HPlc/MS/MS: a comparison of the multiresidue method of Klein and Alder and the QuEChERS method

Since 2003, two new multipesticide residue methods for screening crops for a large number of pesticides, developed by Klein and Alder and Anastassiades et al. (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe; QuEChERS), have been published. Our intention was to compare these two important methods on the basis of their extraction efficiency, reproducibility, ruggedness, ease of use, and speed. In total, 70 pesticides belonging to numerous different substance classes were analyzed at two concentration levels by applying both methods, using five different representative matrixes. In the case of the QuEChERS method, the results of the three sample preparation steps (crude extract, extract after SPE, and extract after SPE and acidification) were compared with each other and with the results obtained with the Klein and Alder method. The extraction efficiencies of the QuEChERS method were far higher, and the sample preparation was much quicker when the last two steps were omitted. In most cases, the extraction efficiencies after the first step were approximately 100%. With extraction efficiencies of mostly less than 70%, the Klein and Alder method did not compare favorably. Some analytes caused problems during evaluation, mostly due to matrix influences.     

Evaluation of alternative sorbents for dispersive solid‐phase extraction clean‐up in the QuEChERS method for the determination of pesticide residues in rice by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry

Many compounds are used for pest control during the production and storage of rice, making it necessary to employ multiclass methods for pesticide residues determination. For this purpose, QuEChERS‐based methods are very efficient, fast and accurate, and improvements in the clean‐up step are important, especially for complex matrices, like cereals. In this work, different sorbents such as chitosan, florisil^®, alumina, diatomaceous earth, graphitized carbon black, besides the commonly used primary secondary amine and octadecylsilane, were evaluated for dispersive solid‐phase extraction clean‐up in acetate‐buffered QuEChERS method for the determination of residues of 20 representative pesticides and one metabolite in rice by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. The sorbent C18 presented the best results, however, chitosan showed similar results, and the best performance among the unconventional sorbents evaluated. The method limit of quantification, attending accuracy (70–120% recovery) and precision (RSD ≤20%) criteria, ranged from 5 to 20 μg/kg. Results showed that chitosan is an effective alternative to reduce analysis costs, maintaining the method reliability and accuracy.     

Multiclass Compatible Sample Preparation for UHPLC–MS/MS Determination of Aflatoxin M1 in Raw Milk

A sample preparation method for aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) determination in raw milk was optimized following the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) strategy, as an alternative to the classic immunoaffinity column clean-up (IAC). The method was adapted to address the complexity of the milk matrix, and to be suitable for final determination by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS). This approach proved also to be compatible with the simultaneous extraction of pesticide residues and other contaminants (mycotoxins). Regarding AFM1, satisfactory linearity was achieved and appropriate sensitivity was maintained, using matrix-matched calibration to compensate for the heavy ion suppression. The accuracy and precision, which were determined through recovery studies, were 70–95 %, with the relative standard deviation below 15 % in all of the cases. The limit of detection (LOD, 0.002 μg L⁻¹) and limit of quantification (0.007 μg L⁻¹) are compatible with current worldwide regulations (maximum levels of 0.5 and 0.05 μg L⁻¹). The procedure was applied to samples that were naturally contaminated with a range of AFM1 at LOQ–0.187 μg L⁻¹, with comparable results to IAC clean-up, which was employed as a reference method. Therefore, AFM1 determination in raw milk by UHPLC–MS/MS detection through the present QuEChERS extraction constitutes a reliable alternative to IAC clean-up and exhibits advantages related to cost, accessibility of materials and simplicity of operation.

     

液相色谱-四极杆/ 飞行时间质谱快速筛查与确证苹果、番茄和甘蓝中的281种农药残留

建立了苹果、番茄和甘蓝中281种农药残留的QuEChERS结合液相色谱-四极杆/飞行时间质谱(LC-Q-TOF/MS)快速筛查方法。方法采用1%醋酸乙腈提取样品,经丙基乙二胺(PSA)净化,LC-Q-TOF/MS测定。281种农药在苹果、番茄和甘蓝中3个添加水平下的回收率在70%～120%范围的比例分别为98.6%、99.3%和98.2%;回收率的相对标准偏差(RSD)均≤20%(n=5);在0.25～10倍最大残留限量(MRL)的含量范围内,线性相关系数r²≥0.99的农药比例分别为95.7%、96.1%和98.2%;检出限分别为0.03～4.47、0.01～4.49和0.02～3.61 μg/kg。本方法采用精确质量数据库和谱图库检索的方式,实现了不用农药标准品对照而完成对果蔬中农药残留的快速筛查,提高了定性鉴别的准确性。应用所建立的方法对30个市售果蔬样品进行筛查,共检出13种农药残留。其中,甘蓝中甲胺磷的含量超过了GB 2763-2012《食品安全国家标准\5食品中农药最大残留限量》和欧盟的MRL;番茄中鱼藤酮的含量超出欧盟的MRL。     

Pesticides Residues Rapid Extraction from Panax Ginseng Using a Modified QuEChERS Method for GC–MS

A modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) rapid detection method followed by gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS) has been developed for the simultaneous determination of 42 pesticides in Panax ginseng. This method can be different from the other QuEChERS methods in the sense that it uses acetone and n-hexane solution rather than acetonitrile to extract and partition pesticides. This acetone, water and n-hexane solution QuEChERS method consists essentially of two steps: extraction/partitioning and purification. In step 1, P. ginseng was mixed with acetone, water and n-hexane solution, and then partitioned by vortex. In step 2, the top layer (n-hexane) was transferred into a centrifuge tube containing primary secondary amine, activated carbon and C₁₈ for purification. After the centrifuge supernatant was injected into GC–MS. The QuEChERS method was applied in P. ginseng detection and we confirmed that this method can easily extract various types of pesticides from P. ginseng. The rates of recovery for pesticides studied were satisfactory, ranging from 75.3 to 119.4 % for most of the pesticides with a relative standard deviation of less than 13 %. The LOQs ranged between 0.5 and 1.2 µg kg⁻¹. The modified QuEChERS method and GC–MS could enable complex pretreatment in P. ginseng analysis quickly and easily.

     

QuEChERS sample preparation for the determination of pesticides and other organic residues in environmental matrices: a critical review

Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS) is an extraction and clean-up technique originally developed for recovering pesticide residues from fruits and vegetables. Since its introduction, and until December 2013, about 700 papers have been published using the QuEChERS technique, according to a literature overview carried out using SciFinder, Elsevier SciVerse, and Google search engines. Most of these papers were dedicated to pesticide multiresidue analysis in food matrices, and this topic has been thoroughly reviewed over recent years. The QuEChERS approach is now rapidly developing beyond its original field of application to analytes other than pesticides, and matrices other than food, such as biological fluids and non-edible plants, including Chinese medicinal plants. Recently, the QuEChERS concept has spread to environmental applications by analyzing not only pesticides but also other compounds of environmental concern in soil, sediments, and water. To the best of our knowledge, QuEChERS environmental applications have not been reviewed so far; therefore, in this contribution, after a general discussion on the evolution and changes of the original QuEChERS method, a critical survey of the literature regarding environmental applications of conventional and modified QuEChERS methodology is provided. The overall recoveries obtained with QuEChERS and other extraction approaches (e.g., accelerated solvent extraction, ultrasonic solvent extraction, liquid/solid extraction, and soxhlet extraction) were compared, providing evidence for QuEChERS higher recoveries for various classes of compounds, such as biopesticides, chloroalkanes, phenols, and perfluoroalkyl substances. The role of physicochemical properties of soil (i.e., clay and organic carbon content, as well as cation exchange capacity) and target analytes (i.e., log K_OW, water solubility, and vapor pressure) were also evaluated in order to interpret recovery and matrix effect data.     

Gas chromatography–triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry: a powerful tool for the (ultra)trace analysis of multiclass environmental contaminants in fish and fish feed

A new method for rapid determination of 73 target organic environmental contaminants including 18 polychlorinated biphenyls, 16 organochlorinated pesticides, 14 brominated flame retardants and 25 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fish and fish feed using gas chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) was developed and validated. GC–MS/MS in electron ionization mode was shown to be a powerful tool for the (ultra)trace analysis of multiclass environmental contaminants in complex matrices, providing measurements with high selectivity and sensitivity. Another positive aspect characterizing the newly developed method is a substantial simplification of the sample preparation, which was achieved by an ethyl acetate QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe) based extraction followed by silica minicolumn clean-up. With use of this sample preparation approach the sample laboratory throughput was increased not only because six samples may be prepared in approximately 1 h, but also because all the above-mentioned groups of contaminants can be determined in a single GC–MS/MS run. Under the optimized conditions, the recoveries of all target analytes in both matrices were within the range from 70 to 120 % and the repeatabilities were 20 % or less. The method quantification limits were in the range from 0.005 to 1 μg kg^–1 and from 0.05 to 10 μg kg^–1 for fish muscle tissue and fish feed, respectively. The developed method was successfully applied to the determination of halogenated persistent organic pollutants and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fish and fish feed samples.