Including Curriculum Focus in Mathematics Professional Development for Middle‐School Mathematics Teachers

This paper examines professional development workshops focused on Connected Math, a particular curriculum utilized or being considered by the middle‐school mathematics teachers involved in the study. The hope was that as teachers better understood the curriculum used in their classrooms, i.e., Connected Math, they would simultaneously deepen their own understanding of the corresponding mathematics content. By focusing on the curriculum materials and the student thought process, teachers would be better able to recognize and examine common student misunderstandings of mathematical content and develop pedagogically sound practices, thus improving their own pedagogical content knowledge. Pre‐ and post‐mathematics content knowledge assessments indicated that engaging middle‐school teachers in the curriculum materials using pedagogy that can be used with their middle‐school students not only solidified teachers' familiarity with such strategies, but also contributed to their understanding of the mathematics content.     

Special Issue Article: A Look at Technology's Role in Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers at the Middle School Level

In last month's issue of School Science and Mathematics, Glenda Lappan addressed the dilemma of supporting teachers in continuing to grow professionally in four domains: Learning more mathematics content; improving their pedagogical skills; improving assessment skills; and addapting the curriculum to the needs of their students. Though it is clear that this kind of learning is best done in the context of what is going on in the classroom, teachers' schedules and other problems make it difficult to implement a coherent classroom based, professional development program. In this article, two more knowledge domains are added to this mix: the ability to (a) use technology and (b) teach with technology effectively. Since the process of learning and teaching is a dynamic one, the author describes his vision of the classroom as a laboratory where teachers get to practice and improve in these six areas and get feedback from an audience of their peers. Reflections are based on a current project in Paterson, New Jersey where the author helps middle school teachers use computer software to improve their mathematics teaching and learning.     

Stepping into iSMART: Understanding Science–Mathematics Integration for Middle School Science and Mathematics Teachers

This paper is based on an online graduate program for middle school science and mathematics teachers in Texas titled Integration of Science, Mathematics and Reflective Teaching (iSMART). Launching the program for its first cohort in fall 2010, the authors attempted to answer the following two questions in this paper: (a) How do the members of the iSMART design team and the first cohort of teacher participants define science and mathematics integration with similar and different emphases? and (b) How would these definitions and concerns impact the ongoing design of the program? The iSMART design team members and the participating cohort teachers had a shared view regarding the importance of integration and its possible impact on student motivation. The findings also revealed that the two groups showed some different points of emphasis in their definitions of integration. These issues will be addressed in the ongoing design of the program in the following three areas: (a) design of the second summer meeting activities, (b) greater emphasis on teacher as researcher and action research, and (c) administrative support for teacher collaboration.     

Issues and Challenges for Middle School Mathematics Teachers in Inclusion Classrooms

The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate typical middle school general education mathematics teachers' beliefs and knowledge of students with learning disabilities and inclusive instruction and to gain an understanding of the process of inclusion as it is implemented in middle school classrooms. In‐depth interviews, surveys, and classroom observations were conducted with seven teachers. The constant comparative method was used to analyze all interview and observation data. The findings reveal that even teachers who believe that inclusion is being successfully implemented are unclear about their responsibilities towards included students and the learning characteristics and specific mathematics teaching approaches that would be effective. The general educators feel that they were grossly under‐prepared during preservice and inservice for the realities of inclusion teaching. The study provides insights that can be used to enhance preservice and inservice programs for teachers and underscores the necessity for building teamwork and collaboration among general and special education middle school teachers.     

Problem Posing: A Neglected Component in Mathematics Courses for Prospective Elementary and Middle School Teachers

The purpose of this article is to describe a scheme which is designed to guide the prospective teacher beyond the point of proficiency as a student solving given problems. By experiencing several stages of inquiry, the scheme provides a mechanism where by the prospective teacher advances toward assuming the role of a teacher posing his or her own problems. Although the scheme has been developed within the context of a standard mathematics course for preservice teachers, the ideas set forth are equally appropriate for incorporation within a science course for prospective teachers.     

Planning District‐Wide Professional Development: Insights Gained From Teachers and Students Regarding Mathematics Teaching in a Large Urban District

This paper describes the mechanism used to gain insights into the state of the art of mathematics instruction in a large urban district in order to design meaningful professional development for the teachers in the district. Surveys of close to 2,000 elementary, middle school, and high school students were collected in order to assess the instructional practices used in mathematics classes across the district. Students were questioned about the frequency of use of various instructional practices that support the meaningful learning of mathematics. These included practices such as problem solving, use of calculators and computers, group work, homework, discussions, and projects, among others. Responses were analyzed and comparisons were drawn between elementary and middle school students' responses and between middle school and high school responses. Finally, fifth‐grade student responses were compared to those of their teachers. Student responses indicated that they had fewer inquiry‐based experiences, fewer student‐to‐student interactions, and fewer opportunities to defend their answers and justify their thinking as they moved from elementary to middle school to high school. In the elementary grades students reported an overemphasis on the use of memorization of facts and procedures and sparse use of calculators. Results were interpreted and specific directions for professional development, as reported in this paper, were drawn from these data. The paper illustrates how student surveys can inform the design of professional development experiences for the teachers in a district.     

Middle School Mathematics Teachers Learning to Teach With Calculators and Computers

This paper reports the results of a project in which experienced middle grades mathematics teachers immersed themselves in calculator and computer use for both doing and teaching mathematics and prepared themselves as leaders for communicating their knowledge to colleagues. Project evaluation included formal observation of students while they used technology in learning mathematics. Classroom observation data suggested that computers hold somewhat more attraction for students than calculators. Overall, students in all 13 classes, independent of the type of technology used, were observed to be off-task 3% of the time. These data suggested a classroom environment in which the teacher worked hard to engage students in mathematical activity. The fact that students were observed off-task so little is encouraging. The difference in off-task behaviors for calculators versus computers suggests that different technologies will indeed have different effects on students. It appears that the introduction of technologies in classrooms altered the ways teachers taught.     

Middle School Mathematics Teachers Learning to Teach with Calculators and Computers

This paper reports the results of a project in which experienced middle grades mathematics teachers immersed themselves in calculator and computer use for both doing and teaching mathematics and prepared themselves as leaders for communicating their knowledge to colleagues. Project evaluation included interviews with participants at the beginning and end of the project and evaluation forms completed at the end of the project. Pre-interviews indicated that virtually all of the participants had no experience using technology to teach mathematics. Many felt that technology was not likely to be as effective in helping students learn mathematics as other teaching techniques. Post-interviews indicated that all teachers were confident of their abilities to use some technologies in teaching mathematics. They acknowledged that technology was useful in developing conceptual understanding and that their role was to guide this conceptual development. The differences in participants' perceptions about how the project affected them yielded suggestions for future inservice efforts about technology.     

Pre‐Service Teachers and Mathematics: The Impact of Service‐Learning on Teacher Preparation

In spite of repeated reform efforts, there is research and data that suggest that teachers lack the needed knowledge to successfully teach elementary mathematics. Some argue that teachers lack the needed content knowledge while other argue that a lack of confidence and practice are impacting teachers’ ability to successful teach mathematics. As a result of these issues, this paper looks at the impact of a service‐learning experience on pre‐service teachers’ confidence and preparation in the area of mathematics. The service‐learning experience had a number of intended and unintended outcomes. As a result of the service‐learning experience, pre‐service teachers noted increased understanding, innovation and confidence in the area of mathematics.     

Preparing Pre‐Service Teachers to Teach Mathematics in Inclusive Classrooms: A Three‐Year Case Study

Federal and state regulations mandating inclusion of students with disabilities in general education classes have made it essential to create pathways for pre‐service teachers to develop skills to teach content to diverse groups of students. The study uses a framework suggested by the relationship between teacher attitude and teacher behavior ( Fullan, 1982 ), teacher beliefs and practice, and self‐efficacy and behavioral change ( Bandura, 1977 ). The purpose of the study was to examine changes, if any, in three cohorts of general education teacher candidates' (n=13, n=8, n=5) attitudes toward teaching mathematics to students with disabilities after participating in focused instructional experiences which provided both information and vicarious positive teaching activities in special education. Data collected included pretest and posttest scores for each of the three cohorts and journal entries. Little or no change in attitude towards students with disabilities and mathematics, and efficacy to teach students with disabilities was observed for the year one and year two cohorts. In the third year the modules were combined with a structured field experience. The data collected from the third year cohort suggested a positive trend in attitude as measured by the survey data and field experience journal data. Future study with larger samples is needed.     

Preparing K‐8 Preservice Teachers in a Content Course for Standards‐Based Mathematics Pedagogy

Many K–8 preservice teachers have not experienced learning mathematics in a standards‐based classroom. This article describes a mathematics content course designed to provide preservice teachers experiences in learning mathematics that will help build a solid foundation for a standards‐based methods course. The content course focuses on developing preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge, as well as helping them realize what it means to learn mathematics that is taught using the pedagogy in the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics ( National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000 ). Furthermore, findings are presented from a study on this course that describe students' pre‐ and postcourse beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions of what it means to learn and teach mathematics. These findings provide evidence that the students in the study are beginning to understand what is meant by a standards‐based classroom. Data were collected from surveys and interviews. Quotes from the students who aspire to be elementary teachers are used throughout the article to support the points.     

The Effects of a Teacher In‐Service on Low‐Achieving Grade 7 and 8 Mathematics Students

Previous research (e.g., Woodward & Baxter, 1997 ) found that Standards‐based mathematics teaching provides marginal or no benefits for low achievers, in contrast with positive effects for middle and high ability students. A randomized quasi‐experiment in 52 Canadian schools found that low achieving grade 7 and 8 students who received support consisting of placement on a learning continuum, instruction focused on their specific learning needs, and concrete materials to represent mathematical constructs, benefited from teaching that emphasized construction over transmission of knowledge. Treatment students showed small but statistically significant improvements over controls in student achievement, and controversially, in mathematical beliefs, and attitudes. The latter finding raised issues of the appropriate balance between Type I and Type II error in educational research.     

Applying NAEP to Improve Mathematics Content and Methods Courses for Preservice Elementary and Middle School Teachers

This study explored how mathematics content and methods courses for preservice elementary and middle school teachers could be improved through the integration of a set of instructional materials based on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). A set of eight instructional modules was developed and tested. The study involved 7 university instructors and 542 preservice teachers (PSTs) from three different universities. A quasi‐experimental nonequivalent groups design was used for this study in which the following data sources were collected and analyzed. Three versions of a Learning Mathematics for Teaching test were given to assess PSTs‘ mathematical content knowledge for teaching: (a) Elementary Number Concepts and Operations—Content Knowledge; (b) Elementary Geometry—Content Knowledge; and (c) Middle School Number Concepts and Operations—Content Knowledge. In addition, the Mathematics Teacher Efficacy Beliefs Instrument was given to assess PSTs’ teacher efficacy beliefs. Test results were analyzed using paired samples t‐tests. Findings suggest that use of instructional materials, based on NAEP, with PSTs results in increases in their mathematical content knowledge for teaching and in their teaching efficacy beliefs.