Coordinating Theories of Learning to Account for Second-Grade Children's Arithmetical Understandings

This article coordinates social constructivism and socioculturalism orientations to explain 2nd-grade children's reasoning with 2-digit quantities. From a social constructivist position, we illustrate how the classroom teacher and the students constituted what counted as an acceptable mathematical explanation. As children offered informal and conventional ways of interpreting problem situations, they were expected to reason with quantities in sensible ways. From a sociocultural position, we explain how the teacher's and students' contributions were situated within the mathematical ways of knowing constituted by the community at large. Particular children's contributions were clarified in terms of the ways in which they participated in socially organized activities. By coordinating these lenses, we argue the local classroom mathematical practices constrained and enabled the mathematical practices of the wider society.     

A Relational Perspective on Issues of Cultural Diversity and Equity as They Play Out in the Mathematics Classroom

In this article, we present a relational perspective in which cultural diversity is viewed as a relation between people's participation in the practices of different communities. In the case at hand, the relevant practices were those of students' local, home communities, and the broader communities to which they belonged in wider society on the one hand and the specifically mathematical practices established by the classroom community on the other hand. In the 1st part of the article, we discuss how we might characterize the practices of these various communities by drawing on Wenger's (1998) notion of a community of practice and on Gee's (1997) notion of a Discourse. In doing so, we question the manner in which students are frequently classified exclusively in terms of the standard categories of race and ethnicity in investigations of equity in mathematics education. Later in the article, we clarify that in addition to focusing on the continuities and contrasts between the practices of different communities, the relational perspective also encompasses issues of both power and identity. As we illustrate, the gatekeeping role that mathematics plays in students' access to educational and economic opportunities is not limited to differences in the ways of knowing associated with participation in the practices of different communities. Instead, it also includes difficulties that students experience in reconciling their views of themselves and who they want to become with the identities that they are invited to construct in the mathematics classroom.     

Teaching and learning mathematics in the collective

In this paper we analyse and explore teaching and learning in the context of a high school mathematics classroom that was deliberately structured as highly interactive and inquiry-oriented. We frame our discussion within enactivism—a theory of cognition that has helped us to understand classroom processes, particularly at the level of the group. We attempt to show how this classroom of mathematics learners operated as a collective and focus in particular on the role of the teacher in establishing, sustaining, and becoming part of such a collective. Our analysis reveals teaching practices that value, capitalize upon, and promote group cognition, our discussion positions such work as teaching a way of being with mathematics, and we close by offering implications for teaching, educational policy, and further research.     

A Relational Perspective on Issues of Cultural Diversity and Equity as They Play Out in the Mathematics Classroom

In this article, we present a relational perspective in which cultural diversity is viewed as a relation between people's participation in the practices of different communities. In the case at hand, the relevant practices were those of students' local, home communities, and the broader communities to which they belonged in wider society on the one hand and the specifically mathematical practices established by the classroom community on the other hand. In the 1st part of the article, we discuss how we might characterize the practices of these various communities by drawing on Wenger's (1998) notion of a community of practice and on Gee's (1997) notion of a Discourse. In doing so, we question the manner in which students are frequently classified exclusively in terms of the standard categories of race and ethnicity in investigations of equity in mathematics education. Later in the article, we clarify that in addition to focusing on the continuities and contrasts between the practices of different communities, the relational perspective also encompasses issues of both power and identity. As we illustrate, the gatekeeping role that mathematics plays in students' access to educational and economic opportunities is not limited to differences in the ways of knowing associated with participation in the practices of different communities. Instead, it also includes difficulties that students experience in reconciling their views of themselves and who they want to become with the identities that they are invited to construct in the mathematics classroom.     

Attention to meaning by algebra teachers

Non-attendance to meaning by students is a prevalent phenomenon in school mathematics. Our goal is to investigate features of instruction that might account for this phenomenon. Drawing on a case study of two high school algebra teachers, we cite episodes from the classroom to illustrate particular teaching actions that de-emphasize meaning. We categorize these actions as pertaining to (a) purpose of new concepts, (b) distinctions in mathematics, (c) mathematical terminology, and (d) mathematical symbols. The specificity of the actions that we identify allows us to suggest several conjectures as to the impact of the teaching practices observed on student learning: that students will develop the belief that mathematics involves executing standard procedures much more than meaning and reasoning, that students will come to see mathematical definitions and results as coincidental or arbitrary, and that students’ treatment of symbols will be largely non-referential.     

Students’ ratings of teacher practices

In this paper, we explore a novel approach for assessing the impact of a professional development programme on classroom practice of in-service middle school mathematics teachers. The particular focus of this study is the assessment of the impact on teachers’ employment of strategies used in the classroom to foster the mathematical habits of mind and mathematical self-efficacy of their students. We describe the creation and testing of a student survey designed to assess teacher classroom practice based primarily on students’ ratings of teacher practices.     

Influence of socio-economic background and cultural practices on mathematics education in India: a contemporary overview in historical perspective

The nature, extent and quality of mathematics learning among young children in India cannot be adequately understood without looking at the larger context of education and the social background of the children. Society, including schools, characterized by large inequalities impacts mathematics learning. Beginning with a brief overview of (mathematics) education in India, in historical and sociological perspectives, an appraisal is presented of the need and nature of mathematics learning revealed by field studies in two communities in a deprived rural setting and a low-income urban setting, respectively. While the latter was economically active, the former was much poorer in work and education opportunities, though had richer cultural practices that involved engagement with mathematical riddles, puzzles, folklores and mnemonic tables. The paper discusses the enabling potential of the knowledge resources, including work-context knowledge, which exist in both the communities despite the prevalent deprivations due to disadvantaged conditions. Yet in both situations mathematics learning remains disconnected from formal school mathematics. Factors within SES that possibly have strong bearings on mathematics learning are highlighted which can scaffold stronger integration with curricular and pedagogic practices. Both the groups presented potentially rich contexts for drawing upon everyday mathematical knowledge that can inform effective mathematics learning, which has been inadequately explored in curriculum and instructional design thus far.     

Which mathematics should we teach engineering students? An empirically grounded case for a broad notion of mathematical thinking

While many engineering educators have proposed changes to theway that mathematics is taught to engineers, the focus has oftenbeen on mathematical content knowledge. Work from the mathematicseducation community suggests that it may be beneficial to considera broader notion of mathematics: mathematical thinking. Schoenfeldidentifies five aspects of mathematical thinking: the mathematicscontent knowledge we want engineering students to learn as wellas problem-solving strategies, use of resources, attitudes andpractices. If we further consider the social and material resourcesavailable to students and the mathematical practices studentsengage in, we have a more complete understanding of the breadthof mathematics and mathematical thinking necessary for engineeringpractice. This article further discusses each of these aspectsof mathematical thinking and offers examples of mathematicalthinking practices based in the authors' previous empiricalstudies of engineering students' and practitioners' uses ofmathematics. The article also offers insights to inform theteaching of mathematics to engineering students.     

Interaction analysis of mathematical communication in primary teaching: The epistemological perspective

Communication between students and teacher in the mathematics classroom is a form of social interaction which focuses on a specific topic:mathematical knowledge. This knowledge cannot be introduced into classroom interaction “from the outside”, but grows through the communicative process, in the course of interactive exchanges between the participants of discussion. Although mathematical communication must be seen and analysed in the same way as any other form of communication, the particularity of interactive constructions of mathematical knowledge and its specificsocial epistemology within the context of teaching processes has to be taken into consideration. Also, the institutional influences of school institutions and those of teaching (analysed in the frame of general socio-interactive research approaches) must be considered. An epistemology-oriented interaction research approaches the specificity of amathematical classroom and communication culture in its analyses.     

Cultivating Computational Thinking Practices and Mathematical Habits of Mind in Lattice Land

There is a great deal of overlap between the set of practices collected under the term “computational thinking” and the mathematical habits of mind that are the focus of much mathematics instruction. Despite this overlap, the links between these two desirable educational outcomes are rarely made explicit, either in classrooms or in the literature. This paper presents Lattice Land, a computational learning environment and accompanying curriculum designed to support the development of mathematical habits of mind and promote computational thinking practices in high-school mathematics classrooms. Lattice Land is a mathematical microworld where learners explore geometrical concepts by manipulating polygons drawn with discrete points on a plane. Using data from an implementation in a low-income, urban public high school, we show how the design of Lattice Land provides an opportunity for learners to use computational thinking practices and develop mathematical habits of mind, including tinkering, experimentation, pattern recognition, and formalizing hypothesis in conventional mathematical notation. We present Lattice Land as a restructuration of geometry, showing how this new and novel representational approach facilitates learners in developing computational thinking and mathematical habits of mind. The paper concludes with a discussion of the interplay between computational thinking and mathematical habits of mind, and how the thoughtful design of computational learning environments can support meaningful learning at the intersection of these disciplines.     

Learning from similarities and differences: a reflection on the potentials and constraints of cross-national studies in mathematics

Research in mathematics education that crosses national boundaries provides new insights into the development and improvement of the teaching and learning of mathematics. In particular, cross-national comparisons lead researchers to more explicit understanding of their own implicit theories about how teachers teach and how children learn mathematics in their local contexts as well as what is going on in school mathematics in other countries. Further, when researchers from multiple countries and regions study collaboratively aspects of teaching and learning of mathematics, the taken-for-granted familiar practices in the classroom can be questioned. Such cross-national comparisons provide opportunities for researchers and educators to probe typical dichotomies such as “high-performing” versus “low performing”, “teacher-centred versus student-centred”, or even “East versus West”, in searching for similarities and differences in educational policies and practices in different cultural contexts.     

Virtual encounters: the murky and furtive world of mathematical inventiveness

Based on Châtelet’s insights into the nature of mathematical inventiveness, drawn from historical analyses, we propose a new way of framing creativity in the mathematics classroom. The approach we develop emphasizes the social and material nature of creative acts. Our analysis of creative acts in two case studies involving primary school classrooms also reveals the characteristic ways in which digital technologies can occasion such acts.     

How to connect school mathematics with students' out-of-school knowledge

In this paper we present an explorative study for which special cultural artifacts have been used, i.e. supermarket receipts, to try to construct with 9-year old pupils (fourth class of primary school) a new mathematical knowledge, i.e. the algorithm for multiplication of decimal numbers. Furthermore also estimation and approximation processes have been introduced, procedures that are not commonly used in ordinary teaching activity. In our study the receipts, through some modifications, have become more explicitly tools of mediation and integration between in and out-of school knowledge, so they can be utilized to create new mathematical goals, thus becoming real mathematizing tools and constituting a didactic interface between in and out-of-school mathematics. In agreement with ethnomathematical perspective we deem that it is a task for the teacher to know, in order to be able to profitably take account of the teaching, the life experienced by the pupil. Future mathematics teachers should be prepared a) to see mathematics incorporated into real world, b) to investigate mathematical ideas and practices of their pupils, and c) to look for ways to incorporate into the curriculum elements belonging to the sociocultural environment of the pupils, as a starting point for mathematical activities in the classroom. In this way the motivation, interest and curiosity of the pupils will be increased and the attitude towards mathematics of both pupils and teachers will be changed.     

Gender justice,human rights and measurement in the mathematics classroom

In line with international trends, the new South African mathematics curriculum implores mathematics educators to realize a pedagogy in their classrooms that is more practical, activity-oriented, and connected to their learners' lives. Drawing on data from a larger study that explores theory–practice relations in mathematics education, this paper shows how such progressive practices, when interpreted with respect to the teaching of measurement which required learners to use different measuring instruments for measuring the school grounds in learning about length and perimeter, were found to be deeply gendered. In two different contexts of an ‘African' township school and a predominantly ‘Indian' suburban school, girls in a grade 6 mathematics classroom faced direct sexism as they struggled to take the opportunity to participate in the activity and learn how to measure – an important mathematical competence and everyday knowledge and skill. The article analyses the data with reference to the human rights imperatives of the new national curricula and approaches to addressing disadvantage and discrimination for girls in mathematics classrooms.     

Research, practice, uncertainty and responsibility

Three issues concerning the relationship between research and practice are addressed. (1) A certain ‘prototype mathematics classroom’ seems to dominate the research field, which in many cases seems selective with respect to what practices to address. I suggest challenging the dominance of the discourse created around the prototype mathematics classroom. (2) I find it important to broaden the school-centred discourse on mathematics education and to address the very different out-of-school practices that include mathematics. Many of these practices are relevant for interpreting what is taking place in a school context. That brings us to (3) socio-political issues of mathematics education. When the different school-sites for learning mathematics as well as the many different practices that include mathematics are related, we enter the socio-political dimension of mathematics education.On the one hand we must consider questions like: Could socio-political discrimination be acted out through mathematics education? Could mathematics education exercise a regimentation and disciplining of students? Could it include discrimination in terms of language? Could it include sexism and racism? On the other hand: Could mathematics education bring about competencies which can be described as empowering, and as supporting the development of mathematical literary or a ‘mathemacy’, important for the development of critical citizenship?However, there is no hope for identifying a one-way route to mathemacy. More generally: There is no simple way of identifying the socio-political functions of mathematics education. Mathematics education has to face uncertainty, and this challenge brings us to the notion of responsibility.     

Revoicing in a Multilingual Classroom

The concept of revoicing has recently received a substantial amount of attention within the mathematics education community. One of the primary purposes of revoicing is to promote a deeper conceptual understanding of mathematics by positioning students in relation to one another, thereby facilitating student debate and mathematical argumentation. Our study reexamines revoicing in a multilingual high school algebra classroom; our findings challenge the assumption that revoicing is necessarily tightly connected with classroom argumentation. We demonstrate that a single discursive form, such as revoicing, can play a wide range of valuable functions within the classroom. More importantly, we investigate systematic differences in the ways that revoicing is used, by a particular teacher, across languages. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.     

Investigations and explorations in the mathematics classroom

In Portugal, since the beginning of the 1990s, problem solving became increasingly identified with mathematical explorations and investigations. A number of research studies have been conducted, focusing on students’ learning, teachers’ classroom practices and teacher education. Currently, this line of work involves studies from primary school to university mathematics. This perspective impacted the mathematics curriculum documents that explicitly recommend teachers to propose mathematics investigations in their classrooms. On national meetings, many teachers report experiences involving students’ doing investigations and indicate to use regularly such tasks in their practice. However, this still appears to be a marginal activity in most mathematics classes, especially when there is pressure for preparation for external examinations (at grades 9 and 12). International assessments such as PISA and national assessments (at grades 4 and 6) emphasize tasks with realistic contexts. They reinforce the view that mathematics tasks must be varied beyond simple computational exercises or intricate abstract problems but they do not support the notion of extended explorations. Future developments will show what paths will emerge from these contradictions between promising research and classroom reports, curriculum orientations, professional experience, and assessment frameworks and instruments.     

Old Math, New Math: Parents' Experiences with Standards-Based Reform

We focus on how African American parents in a low-income neighborhood experience, interpret, and respond to current reform efforts as implemented in their children's school. As part of a larger project on parent-child numeracy connections in an elementary school, we interviewed 10 parents and held 2 focus group meetings, during which parents shared their experiences with mathematics as students themselves and as parents of children using a Standards-based curriculum. Even though parents saw themselves as critical players in their children's learning, we found that the implementation of reform-oriented curriculum tended to disempower parents with respect to school mathematics. Parents had little understanding of the reform-based approaches, and thus limited access to the discourse of reform. Our findings call for examination of the effect that reforms have on parents, particularly when the current educational climate calls for increased parent participation and involvement.

If an 8 year old can do it, I know I can do it. I was like—wait a minute, he's the kid and I'm the parent, and he knows and I don't know. He had got upset one day and said, “Mom, you're going to make me get a bad grade. That's not right. That's not right. That's wrong.”—Shanice, mother of three