Various crystalline morphology of poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate) in its miscible blends with poly(vinylidene fluoride)

Poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene adipate) (PBSA) are crystalline/crystalline polymer blends with PVDF being the high-T(m) component and PBSA being the low-T(m) component, respectively. PVDF/PBSA blends are miscible as shown by the decrease of crystallization peak temperature and melting point temperature of each component with increasing the other component content and the homogeneous melt. The low-T(m) component PBSA presents various confined crystalline morphologies due to the presence of the high-T(m) component PVDF crystals by changing blend composition and crystallization conditions in the blends. There are mainly three different types of crystalline morphologies for PBSA in its miscible blends with PVDF. First, crystallization of PBSA commenced in the interspherulitic regions of the PVDF spherulites and continued to develop inside them in the case of PVDF-rich blends under two-step crystallization conditions. Second, PBSA spherulites appeared first in the left space after the complete crystallization of PVDF, contacted and penetrated the PVDF spherulites by forming interpenetrated spherulites in the case of PVDF-poor blends under two-step crystallization condition. Third, PBSA spherulites nucleated and continued to grow inside the PVDF spherulites that had already filled the whole space during the quenching process in the case of PBSA-rich blends under one-step crystallization condition. The conditions of forming the various crystalline morphologies were discussed.     

Crystallization and morphology of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends. III. Crystallization and phase diagram by differential scanning calorimetry

The crystallization of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) blends was studied with differential scanning calorimetry, from which the phase diagram was derived. Strong miscibility was underlined by the large negative Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (?0.25). The crystallization of the blend components differed remarkably. Whereas PVDF always crystallized in the surroundings of a homogeneous melt, PHB crystallized in a volume that was confined by the already existing PVDF spherulites, partly in their surroundings and partly inside. Under isothermal conditions, PVDF usually crystallized regularly in three dimensions with predominant quench‐induced athermal nucleation. The Avrami exponent for PVDF dendritic spherulitic growth was, however, distinctly smaller than that for compact growth, and this revealed the two‐dimensional lamellar growth inside. This deviation from ideal Avrami behavior was caused by the development of compositional inhomogeneities as PVDF crystallization proceeded, and this decelerated the kinetics. PHB crystallized three‐dimensionally with mixed thermal and athermal nucleation outside the PVDF spherulites. Inside the PVDF spherulites, PHB crystallization proceeded in a fibrillar fashion with thermal nucleation; the growth front followed the amorphous paths inside the dendritic PVDF spherulites. The crystallization was faster than that in the melt of uncrystallized PVDF. Solid PVDF acts possibly heterogeneously nucleating, accelerating PHB crystallization. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 287–295, 2005     

Structure and morphology of polypropylene/poly(ethylene-co-propylene) in situ blends synthesized by spherical Ziegler-Natta catalyst

Polypropylene/poly(ethylene-co-propylene) (iPP/EPR) in situ blends of different composition were synthesized by spherical Ziegler-Natta catalyst, and were fractionated into three portions: the random copolymer (EPR), the block copolymer, and the iPP matrix. The EPR fraction was characterized by ¹³C NMR, and the block copolymer fraction was characterized by crystalline segregation and differential scanning calorimetry analysis. The blends showed bi-phase structure with EPR existing in the dispersed phase. Increasing EPR in the blends resulted in increase of the number and diameter of the EPR particles, but there is an upper limit for the particle number. There were only highly irregular spherulites or tiny crystallites in the isothermal crystallized blends. The morphology of the impact fracture surfaces of the blends clearly showed that they were fractured in ductile fashion. There was strong dependence of impact strength of the blends on their morphology, and the sequence distributions of the EPR and segmented copolymer fractions also markedly influenced the mechanical properties.     

Miscibility and crystallization behavior in blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(vinylidene fluoride): Effect of star‐like topology of poly(methyl methacrylate) chain

A tetraarmed star‐shaped poly(methyl methacrylate) (s‐PMMA) was synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization with 2‐bromoisobutyryl pentaerythritol as the initiator. For comparison, a linear PMMA with the identical molecular weight (l‐PMMA) was also prepared. The blends of the two PMMA samples with poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) were prepared to investigate the effect of macromolecular topological structure on miscibility and crystallization behavior of the binary blends. The behavior of single and composition‐dependent glass transition temperatures was found for the blends of s‐PMMA with PVDF, indicating that the s‐PMMA is miscible with PVDF in the amorphous state just like l‐PMMA. The miscibility was further evidenced by the depression of equilibrium melting points. It is found that the blends of s‐PMMA and PVDF displayed the larger k value of Gordon–Taylor equation than the blends of l‐PMMA and PVDF blends. According to the depression of equilibrium melting points, the intermolecular parameters for the two blends were estimated. It is noted that the s‐PMMA/PVDF blends displayed the lower interaction parameter than l‐PMMA/PVDF blends. The isothermal crystallization kinetics shows that the crystallization of PVDF in the blends containing s‐PMMA is faster than that in the blends containing the linear PMMA. The surface‐folding free energy of PVDF chains in the blends containing s‐PMMA is significantly lower than those in the blends containing l‐PMMA. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 2580–2593, 2007     

Effect of low contents of a polyaniline derivative on the crystallization and electrical properties of blends with PVDF

The effect of low levels of poly(o‐methoxyaniline) (POMA) on the crystallization, morphology, and electrical characteristics of blends with poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) were studied by infrared spectroscopy, AC electrical measurements, and optical microscopy. Undoped POMA has a strong effect in increasing the α‐phase and decreasing the β‐phase content of PVDF in blends crystallized from solution. For blends melt crystallized, doped POMA promotes much greater homogeneity than undoped POMA. Interestingly, doped POMA promotes the nucleation and growth of unringed PVDF spherulites, whereas undoped POMA hinders it. The doping state of the POMA was also extremely important in determining the electrical behavior of the blend. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 37: 1219–1224, 1999     

Crystallization and morphology of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends. II. Morphology and crystallization kinetics by time resolved X‐ray scattering

The development of the morphology in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PVDF/PHB) blends upon isothermal and anisothermal crystallization is investigated by time‐resolved small‐ and wide‐angle X‐ray scattering. The components are completely miscible in the melt but crystallize separately; they crystallize stepwise at different temperatures or sequentially with isothermal or anisothermal conditions, respectively. The PVDF crystallizes undisturbed whereas PHB crystallizes in a confined space that is determined by the existing supermolecular structure of the PVDF. The investigations reveal that composition inhomogeneities may initially develop in the remaining melt or in the amorphous phases of the PVDF upon crystallization of that component. The subsequent crystallization of the PHB depends on these heterogeneities and the supermolecular structure of PVDF (dendritically or globularly spherulitic). PHB may form separate spherulites that start to grow from the melt, or it may develop “interlocking spherulites” that start to grow from inside a PVDF spherulite. Occasionally, a large number of PVDF spherulites may be incorporated into PHB interlocking spherulites. The separate PHB spherulites may intrude into the PVDF spherulites upon further growth, which results in “interpenetrating spherulites.” Interlocking and interpenetrating are realized by the growth of separate lamellar stacks (“fibrils”) of the blend components. There is no interlamellar growth. The growth direction of the PHB fibrils follows that of the existing PVDF fibrils. Depending on the distribution of the PHB molecules on the interlamellar and interfibrillar PVDF regions, the lamellar arrangement of the PVDF may contract or expand upon PHB crystallization and the adjacent fibrils of the two components are linked or clearly separated. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 974–985, 2004     

聚β—羟基丁酯酯／超高分子量聚氧化乙烯共混体系相容性和结晶行为

为了解决废弃塑料引起的“白色污染”问题,世界各国竞相研制开发可生物降解高分子材料,其中,有关聚β羟基丁酸酯［ｐｏｌｙ（βｈｙｄｒｏｘｙｂｕｔｙｒａｔｅ）（ＰＨＢ）］的研究尤其活跃．然而,由于商品价格较高,材料本身抗冲击性能较差、加工窗口较窄等限制...     

聚β-羟基丁酸酯/超高分子量聚氧化乙烯共混体系相容性和结晶行为

为了解决废弃塑料引起的“白色污染”问题,世界各国竞相研制开发可生物降解高分子材料,其中,有关聚β 羟基丁酸酯［ｐｏｌｙ（β ｈｙｄｒｏｘｙｂｕｔｙｒａｔｅ）（ＰＨＢ）］的研究尤其活跃．然而,由于商品价格较高,材料本身抗冲击性能较差、加工窗口较窄等限制...     

Controlled grafting from poly(vinylidene fluoride) films by surface‐initiated reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer polymerization

A reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization technique was applied to graft polymerize brushes of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(poly(ethylene glycol) monomethacrylate) (PPEGMA) from poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) surfaces. PVDF surfaces were exposed to aqueous LiOH, followed by successive reductions with NaBH₄ and DIBAL‐H to obtain hydroxyl functionality. Azo‐functionalities, as surface initiators for grafting, were immobilized on the PVDF surfaces by esterification of 4,4′‐azobis(4‐cyanopentanoic acid) and the surface hydroxyl groups. The chemical composition and surface topography of the graft‐functionalized PVDF surfaces were characterized by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, attenuated total reflectance‐FTIR spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy. Kinetics studies revealed a linear increase in the graft concentration of PMMA and PPEGMA with the reaction time, indicating that the chain growth from the surface was consistent with a “controlled” or “living” process. The living chain ends were used as the macroinitiator for the synthesis of diblock copolymer brushes. Water contact angles on PVDF films were reduced by surface grafting of PEGMA and MMA. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 3071–3082, 2006     

Miscibility enhancement and formation of interpenetrating spherulites in ternary blends of crystalline polymers

Miscible blends of three crystalline polymers, namely poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), poly(ethylene succinate) (PES), and poly(oxyethylene) (POE), exhibited interpenetrating spherulites, where a spherulite of one component grows inside the spherulites of other components. PBS and PES were immiscible above the melting points, T_m, of these substances, while ternary blends with POE showed miscibility, which depended on the molecular weight of POE. PBS and PES exhibited the same spherulitic growth process as in a miscible binary blend when they were crystallized from a homogeneous ternary melt. Spherulites of PBS, which is the highest‐T_m component, filled the whole volume first when a miscible ternary blend was quenched below T_m of POE, the lowest‐T_m component. Then, the blends showed either two types of crystallization processes. One was successive nucleation and growth of PES and POE spherulites, that is, PES nucleated and developed spherulites inside the PBS spherulites and then POE spherulites grew inside the interlocked spherulites of PBS and PES. The other was simultaneous growth and the formation of interpenetrating spherulites of PES and POE inside the PBS spherulites. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 48: 706–711, 2010     

Comparative studies on miscibility and phase behavior of linear and star poly(2‐methyl‐2‐oxazoline) blends with poly(vinylidene fluoride)

The comparative studies on the miscibility and phase behavior between the blends of linear and star‐shaped poly(2‐methyl‐2‐oxazoline) with poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) were carried out in this work. The linear poly(2‐methyl‐2‐oxazoline) was synthesized by the ring opening polymerization of 2‐methyl‐2‐oxazoline in the presence of methyl p‐toluenesulfonate (MeOTs) whereas the star‐shaped poly(2‐methyl‐2‐oxazoline) was synthesized with octa(3‐iodopropyl) polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane [(IC₃H₆)₈Si₈O₁₂, OipPOSS] as an octafunctional initiator. The polymers with different topological structures were characterized by means of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. It is found that the star‐shaped poly(2‐methyl‐2‐oxazoline) was miscible with poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF), which was evidenced by single glass‐transition temperature behavior and the equilibrium melting‐point depression. Nonetheless, the blends of linear poly(2‐methyl‐2‐oxazoline) with PVDF were phase‐separated. The difference in miscibility was ascribed to the topological effect of PMOx macromolecules on the miscibility. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 942–952, 2006     

Effects of partial replacement of silicone rubber with flurorubber on properties of dynamically cured poly(vinylidene fluoride)/silicone rubber/flurorubber ternary blends

Blends of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF), silicone rubber (SR) and flurorubber (FKM) were prepared via peroxide dynamic vulcanization. The effect of FKM loading on the morphology, mechanical properties, crystallization behavior, rheology and dynamic mechanical properties of the PVDF/SR/FKM ternary blends was investigated. A “network” was observed in the PVDF/SR binary blends, which disappeared in the ternary blends, but a core-shell-like structure was formed. The mechanical properties were significantly improved. The Izod impact strength of PVDF/SR/FKM blend with 19 wt% FKM was 18.3 kJ/m², which was 3–4 times higher than the PVDF/SR binary blend. The complex viscosity and storage modulus of the PVDF/SR/FKM blends decreased with increasing FKM content, hence the processability was improved. The increase of FKM content seemed to show a favorable effect on the crystallization of the PVDF component. It promoted the nucleation process of PVDF, leading to increased polymer crystallization rate and higher crystallization temperature. The glass-rubber transition temperature of the PVDF phase moved to a lower temperature.     

Effects of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene and mould temperature on morphological evolution of isotactic polypropylene at micro-injection moulding condition

The effects of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and mould temperature (T_mould) on an isotactic polypropylene (iPP) matrix moulded via micro-injection were investigated via polarized light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, wide-angle X-ray diffraction and small-angle X-ray scattering. Results showed that the complex viscosity of the system increased significantly when the UHMWPE content was more than 5%; however, this viscosity decreased when the UHMWPE content was less than 5%. In addition, the addition of UHMWPE increased the onset of crystallisation temperature and the relative crystallinity of the β-form crystals in micro-injection moulded specimens. Moreover, the UHMWPE phase induced the formation of fan-shaped β crystals in iPP/UHMWPE blends. When mould temperature was 50 °C, the degree of orientation of microparts increased and the crystalline structures were highly compact. However, the relative crystallinity of the β-phase form (K_β) was lower than those prepared at 130 °C T_mould. Most importantly, well-oriented, bundle-like β crystals have been discovered for the first time in 5 wt.% UHMWPE/iPP blends obtained at 130 °C T_mould owing to the “orientation-maintenance” and “shear-amplification” effects of UHMWPE.     

Crystalline Morphology and Crystallization Kinetics of Melt-miscible Crystalline/Crystalline Polymer Blends of Poly（vinylidene fluoride） and Poly（butylene succinate-co-24mol% hexamethylene succinate）

Poly（vinylidene fluoride） （PVDF） and poly（butylene succinate-co-24 mol% hexamethylene succinate） （PBHS）, both crystalline polymers, formed melt-miscible crystalline/crystalline polymer blends. Both the characteristic diffraction peaks and nonisothermal melt crystallization peak of each component were found in the blends, indicating that PVDF and PBHS crystallized separately. The crystalline morphology and crystallization kinetics of each component were studied under different crystallization conditions for the PVDF/PBHS blends. Both the spherulitic growth rates and overall isothermal melt crystallization rates of blended PVDF decreased with increasing the PBHS composition and were lower than those of neat PVDF, when the crystallization temperature was above the melting point of PBHS component. The crystallization mechanism of neat and blended PVDF remained unchanged, despite changes of blend composition and crystallization temperature. The crystallization kinetics and crystalline morphology of neat and blended PBHS were further studied, when the crystallization temperature was below the melting point of PBHS component. Relative to neat PBHS, the overall crystallization rates of the blended PBHS first increased and then decreased with increasing the PVDF content in the blends, indicating that the preexisting PVDF crystals may show different effects on the nucleation and crystal growth of PBHS component in the crystalline/crystalline polymer blends.     

Crystallization behavior and hydrophilicity of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)/poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA)/poly(styrene-<Emphasis Type="Italic">co</Emphasis>-acrylonitrile) (SAN) ternary blends

Compatibilization of the partially miscible poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)/poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) pair by a third homopolymer, i.e., poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), was investigated in relation to cross section morphology, crystallization behaviors and hydrophilicity of the polyblends. Scanning electron microscopy showed a more regular and homogeneous morphology when more than 15 wt.% PMMA was incorporated. The samples presented only α phase regardless of PMMA content in the blend. As the PMMA content increased in the blends, the interactions between each component were enhanced, and the crystallization of PVDF was limited, leading to a decreasing of the crystallinity and the crystallite thickness. Besides, the hydrophilicity of PVDF was further improved by PMMA addition. The sample containing 15 wt.% PMMA showed a more hydrophilic property due to the more polar part of surface tension induced by PMMA addition. Observed from the cross section of the blends, the miscibility of partially miscible PVDF/SAN blends were efficiently improved by PMMA incorporation.     

Molecular dynamics in PVDF/PVA blends as revealed by dielectric loss spectroscopy

The relaxation behavior of a series of compatible poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and poly(vinyl acetate) (PVA) blends has been investigated by dielectric spectroscopy in a broad frequency and temperature range. Blends with PVDF content higher than 60% in weight are semicrystalline. Semicrystalline blends show a relaxation (α_c) occurring in the crystalline phase of PVDF. Both semicrystalline and amorphous blends exhibit two processes, α and β associated to the overall segmental dynamics and to localized motions in the amorphous phase, respectively. For high PVDF content samples, the β relaxation exhibits an anomalous behavior characterized by a crossover from segmental to local dynamics, upon decreasing temperature, attributed to confinement effects taking place in PVDF segregated regions. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 45: 1653–1661, 2007     

Phase Behavior of Polymer Blends

The present report deals with some results on phase behavior, miscibility and phase separation for several polymer blends casting from solutions. These blends are grouped as the amorphous polymer blends, blends containing a crystalline polymer or two crystalline polymers. The blends of PMMA/PVAc were miscible and underwent phase separation at elevated temperature, exhibited LCST behavior. The benzoylated PPO has both UCST and LCST nature. For the systems composed of crystalline polymer poly(ethylene oxide) and amorphous polyurethane, of two crystalline polymers poly(-caprolactone) and poly[3,3,-bis-(chloromethyl) oxetane], appear a single T_g, indicating these blends are miscible. The interaction parameter B's were determined to be –14 J cm^–3, –15 J cm^–3 respectively. Phase separation of phenolphthalein poly(ether ether sulfone)/PEO blends were discussed in terms of thermal properties, such as their melting and crystallization behavior.This revised version was published online in November 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Miscible blends prepared from two crystalline polymers

Differential scanning calorimetry was used to determine the miscibility behavior of several polyester/Saran blends, the two polymers forming these blends being semicrystalline. It was found that Saran is miscible with polycaprolactone (PCL), polyvalerolactone, poly(butylene adipate), and poly(hexamethylene sebacate) since a single glass transition temperature T_g was observed at each composition. However, immiscibility was found between Saran and poly(ethylene adipate), poly-(ethylene succinate), poly(β-propiolactone), and poly(α-methyl-α-n-propyl-β-propiolactone) since two T_g's were recorded at several compositions. Blends were then obtained containing, over a wide range of composition, a miscible amorphous phase and two different types of crystals. From melting-point depression data on PCL and Saran crystals, thermodynamic interaction parameters χ were calculated and found to be different for PCL-rich blends and for Saran-rich blends. This result suggests a variation of χ with composition. Saran is a polymer which does not contain α-hydrogens and its miscibility with polyesters may result from a β-hydrogen bonding interaction or a C?O/C? Cl dipole-dipole interaction.     

Specific interactions in blends of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(bisphenol A-co-epichlorohydrin): FTIR and thermal study

Blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) of high molecular weight with poly(bisphenol A-co-epichlorohydrin) (PBE) with high epoxy equivalent were studied spectroscopically, thermally and morphologically. As similar systems of low molecular weight, a single T_g was observed for all blends, indicating miscibility. A progressive decrease in the degree of crystallinity and in the size of the PEO spherulites as the PBE is added is also observed. Quantitative analysis from FTIR spectra provided determination of specific interactions between the constituents and their variation with PEO content. Simulations were performed utilising the spectra of the pure polymers to confirm that the observed changes in the experimental spectra of the blends were due to interaction between the polymers.     

Hydrophilic modification of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) by in situ polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomer

The hydrophilicity of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was first improved by in situ polymerization of polar monomer in PVDF solution. Methyl methacrylate was adopted as the reaction monomer, and the polymerization occurred in a solution of PVDF in N,N-dimethylformamide. PVDF/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blend was obtained after in situ polymerization. The relative hydrophilicity of the in situ blend was characterized by contact angle measurement. At the same time, the hydrophilicity of the PVDF/PMMA blends prepared by solution blending was compared with that of the in situ blend. The contact angle measurements indicated that in situ polymerization has a stronger modifying effect on the hydrophilicity of PVDF than solution blending.