The temporal effect in listeners with mild to moderate cochlear hearing impairment

This study examines the relationship between a temporal masking effect and cochlear hearing impairment. The threshold level of a long-duration broadband masker needed to mask a short-duration tonal signal was measured for signals presented 2 ms (short-delay) or 202 ms (long-delay condition) after masker onset. The difference between these thresholds is the temporal effect. In two previous studies with normal-hearing listeners, estimates of gain of the cochlear active process derived from such data suggested a decrease in gain during the course of the masker. This hypothesis was further examined in the present study by testing listeners with mild to moderate cochlear hearing impairment. Results are consistent with a decrease in gain in the short-delay condition with increasing hearing impairment, and also less change in gain with increasing hearing impairment.     

Temporal integration and compression near absolute threshold in normal and impaired ears

The decrease in absolute threshold with increasing stimulus duration (often referred to as "temporal integration") is greater for listeners with normal hearing than for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. It has been suggested that the difference is related to reduced basilar-membrane (BM) compression in the impaired group. The present experiment tested this hypothesis by comparing temporal integration and BM compression in normal and impaired ears at low levels. Absolute thresholds were measured for 4, 24, and 44 ms pure-tone signals, with frequencies (f(s)) of 2 and 4 kHz. The difference between the absolute thresholds for the 4 and 24 ms signals was used as a measure of temporal integration. Compression near threshold was estimated by measuring the level of a 100 ms off-frequency (0.45f(s)) pure-tone forward masker required to mask a 44 ms pure-tone signal presented at sensation levels of 5 and 10 dB. There was a significant negative correlation between amount of temporal integration and absolute threshold. However, there was no correlation between absolute threshold and compression at low levels; both normal and impaired ears showed a nearly linear response. The results suggest that the differences in integration between normal and impaired ears cannot be explained by differences in BM compression.     

Relations among some psychoacoustic parameters in normal and cochlearly impaired listeners

Frequency resolution (viz., masking by low-pass-filtered noise and broadband noise) and temporal resolution (viz., masking by interrupted noise) were compared with hearing thresholds and acoustic reflex thresholds for four normally hearing and 13 cochlearly impaired subjects. Two models, one for frequency resolution (model I) and one for temporal resolution (model II), were introduced, and these provided a means of predicting individual frequency and temporal resolution from hearing thresholds for both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Model I is based on the assumption that the upward spread of masking increases in cochlearly impaired hearing with an amount proportional to the hearing threshold in dB HL. Model II is based on the assumption that the poststimulatory masked thresholds return to the level of the hearing threshold within a duration of 200 ms, independent of the level of the masker and the amount of cochlear hearing loss. Model parameters were determined from results from other studies. Although some discrepancies between measured and predicted values were observed, the model predictions generally agree with measurements. Thus, to a first-order approximation, it seems possible to predict individual frequency and temporal resolution of cochlearly hearing-impaired listeners solely on the basis of their hearing thresholds.     

Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects

Subjects with cochlear impairments often show reduced temporal resolution as measured in gap-detection tasks. The primary goals of these experiments were: to assess the extent to which the enlarged gap thresholds can be explained by elevations in absolute threshold; and to determine whether the large gap thresholds can be explained by the same processes that lead to a slower-than-normal recovery from forward masking. In experiment I gap thresholds were measured for nine unilaterally and eight bilaterally impaired subjects, using bandlimited noise stimuli centered at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz. Gap thresholds were usually larger for the impaired ears, even when the comparisons were made at equal sensation levels (SLs). Gap thresholds tended to increase with increasing absolute threshold, but the scatter of gap thresholds was large for a given degree of hearing loss. In experiment II threshold was measured as a function of the delay between the onset of a 210-ms masker and the onset of a 10-ms signal in both simultaneous- and forward-masking conditions. The signal frequency was equal to the center frequency of the bandlimited noise masker, which was 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 kHz. Five subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments, two subjects with bilateral impairments, and two normal subjects were tested. The rate of recovery from forward masking, particularly the initial rate, was usually slower for the impaired ears, even when the maskers were presented at equal SLs. Large gap thresholds tended to be associated with slow rates of recovery from forward masking.     

Temporal integration of trains of tone pulses by normal and by cochlearly impaired listeners

Two experiments investigated the temporal integration of trains of tone pulses by normal and by cochlearly impaired listeners. In the first experiment, thresholds were measured for a single 5-ms, 4-kHz tone pulse, and for ten such tone pulses as a function of interpulse interval (delta t). For normal listeners, temporal integration, defined as the threshold difference between one and ten pulses, was about 8 dB for delta t less than 20 ms, and about 5 dB at longer delta t's. For impaired listeners, temporal integration was only about 2-3 dB across the range of delta t's (5-160 ms) studied. A second experiment measured psychometric functions (log d' versus log signal power) for a single pulse and for ten pulses with delta t's of 5 ms and 80 ms. The normal listeners' functions had slopes close to unity in all three conditions, with a few exceptions. The impaired listeners' functions had slopes close to unity for ten pulses with delta t = 5 ms, but had slopes significantly greater than unity for delta t = 80 ms, and for a single pulse. At delta t = 80 ms, the increase in d' relative to the condition with a single tone was similar (a factor of square root of 10) for both impaired and normal listeners, but the threshold difference was smaller for the impaired listeners due to their steeper psychometric functions. For impaired listeners, then, temporal integration at delta t = 80 ms was normal in terms of a change in d' but abnormal when measured as a threshold difference.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.

To investigate how hearing loss of primarily cochlear origin affects the loudness of brief tones, loudness matches between 5- and 200-ms tones were obtained as a function of level for 15 listeners with cochlear impairments and for seven age-matched controls. Three frequencies, usually 0.5, 1, and 4 kHz, were tested in each listener using a two-interval, two--alternative forced--choice (2I, 2AFC) paradigm with a roving-level, up-down adaptive procedure. Results for the normal listeners generally were consistent with published data [e.g., Florentine et al., J. Acoust Soc. Am. 99, 1633-1644 (1996)]. The amount of temporal integration--defined as the level difference between equally loud short and long tones--varied nonmonotonically with level and was largest at moderate levels. No consistent effect of frequency was apparent. The impaired listeners varied widely, but most showed a clear effect of level on the amount of temporal integration. Overall, their results appear consistent with expectations based on knowledge of the general properties of their loudness-growth functions and the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis, which states that the loudness ratio between equal-SPL long and brief tones is the same at all SPLs. The impaired listeners' amounts of temporal integration at high SPLs often were larger than normal, although it was reduced near threshold. When evaluated at equal SLs, the amount of temporal integration well above threshold usually was in the low end of the normal range. Two listeners with abrupt high-frequency hearing losses (slopes > 50 dB/octave) showed larger-than-normal maximal amounts of temporal integration (40 to 50 dB). This finding is consistent with the shallow loudness functions predicted by our excitation-pattern model for impaired listeners [Florentine et al., in Modeling Sensorineural Hearing Loss, edited by W. Jesteadt (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1997), pp. 187-198]. Loudness functions derived from impaired listeners' temporal-integration functions indicate that restoration of loudness in listeners with cochlear hearing loss usually will require the same gain whether the sound is short or long.     

The effect of basilar-membrane nonlinearity on the shapes of masking period patterns in normal and impaired hearing

Masking period patterns (MPPs) were measured in listeners with normal and impaired hearing using amplitude-modulated tonal maskers and short tonal probes. The frequency of the masker was either the same as the frequency of the probe (on-frequency masking) or was one octave below the frequency of the probe (off-frequency masking). In experiment 1, MPPs were measured for listeners with normal hearing using different masker levels. Carrier frequencies of 3 and 6 kHz were used for the masker. The probe had a frequency of 6 kHz. For all masker levels, the off-frequency MPPs exhibited deeper and longer valleys compared with the on-frequency MPPs. Hearing-impaired listeners were tested in experiment 2. For some hearing-impaired subjects, masker frequencies of 1.5 kHz and 3 kHz were paired with a probe frequency of 3 kHz. MPPs measured for listeners with hearing loss had similar shapes for on- and off-frequency maskers. It was hypothesized that the shapes of MPPs reflect nonlinear processing at the level of the basilar membrane in normal hearing and more linear processing in impaired hearing. A model assuming different cochlear gains for normal versus impaired hearing and similar parameters of the temporal integrator for both groups of listeners successfully predicted the MPPs.     

Age differences in backward masking

The present study was designed to assess the effects of age on the time course of backward masking. In experiment 1, thresholds for detecting a 10-ms, 500-Hz sinusoidal signal were measured as a function of the temporal separation between the signal and a 50-ms broadband masker. Subjects were younger (18-24) and older (over age 65) adults with normal hearing (thresholds less than 20 dB HL) for frequencies of 4 kHz and below. Younger subjects exhibited less overall masking and steeper recovery functions than did the older adults. Masked thresholds for younger participants approached unmasked thresholds for signal-masker delays greater than 6-8 ms. In contrast, older adults exhibited significant masking even at the longest delay tested (20 ms). In experiment 2, signal duration was decreased to 5 ms for a separate group of younger adults. Although overall thresholds were elevated for the shorter signal duration, the slope of the backward masking recovery function was not different from that observed for younger adults in experiment 1. The results suggest that age, independent of hearing loss, affects the temporal course of backward masking.     

Perception of amplitude envelope variations of pulsatile electrotactile stimuli

Gross variations of the speech amplitude envelope, such as the duration of different segments and the gaps between them, carry information about prosody and some segmental features of vowels and consonants. The amplitude envelope is one parameter encoded by the Tickle Talker, an electrotactile speech processor for the hearing impaired which stimulates the digital nerve bundles with a pulsatile electric current. Psychophysical experiments measuring the duration discrimination and identification, gap detection, and integration times for pulsatile electrical stimulation are described and compared with similar auditory measures for normal and impaired hearing and electrical stimulation via a cochlear implant. The tactile duration limen of 15% for a 300-ms standard was similar to auditory measures. Tactile gap detection thresholds of 9 to 20 ms were larger than for normal-hearing but shorter than for some hearing-impaired listeners and cochlear implant users. The electrotactile integration time of about 250 ms was shorter than previously measured tactile values but longer than auditory integration times. The results indicate that the gross amplitude envelope variations should be conveyed well by the Tickle Talker. Short bursts of low amplitude are the features most likely to be poorly perceived.     

Temporal integration, frequency resolution, and off-frequency listening in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners

Temporal integration for a 1000-Hz signal was determined for normal-hearing and cochlear hearing-impaired listeners in quiet and in masking noise of variable bandwidth. Critical ratio and 3-dB critical band measures of frequency resolution were derived from the masking data. Temporal integration for the normal-hearing listeners was markedly reduced in narrow-band noise, when contrasted with temporal integration in quiet or in wideband noise. The effect of noise bandwidth on temporal integration was smaller for the hearing-impaired group. Hearing-impaired subjects showed both reduced temporal integration and reduced frequency resolution for the 200-ms signal. However, a direct relation between temporal integration and frequency resolution was not indicated. Frequency resolution for the normal-hearing listeners did not differ from that of the hearing-impaired listeners for the 20-ms signal. It was suggested that some of the frequency resolution and temporal integration differences between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners could be accounted for by off-frequency listening.     

Forward masking: adaptation or integration?

The aim of this study was to attempt to distinguish between neural adaptation and persistence (or temporal integration) as possible explanations of forward masking. Thresholds were measured for a sinusoidal signal as a function of signal duration for conditions where the delay between the masker offset and the signal offset (the offset-offset interval) was fixed. The masker was a 200-ms broadband noise, presented at a spectrum level of 40 dB (re: 20 microPa), and the signal was a 4-kHz sinusoid, gated with 2-ms ramps. The offset-offset interval was fixed at various durations between 4 and 102 ms and signal thresholds were measured for a range of signal durations at each interval. A substantial decrease in thresholds was observed with increasing duration for signal durations up to about 20 ms. At short offset-offset intervals, the amount of temporal integration exceeded that normally found in quiet. The results were simulated using models of temporal integration (the temporal-window model) and adaptation. For both models, the inclusion of a peripheral nonlinearity, similar to that observed physiologically in studies of the basilar membrane, was essential in producing a good fit to the data. Both models were about equally successful in accounting for the present data. However, the temporal-window model provided a somewhat better account of similar data from a simultaneous-masking experiment, using the same parameters. This suggests that the linear, time-invariant properties of the temporal-window approach are appropriate for modeling forward masking. Overall the results confirm that forward masking can be described in terms of peripheral nonlinearity followed by linear temporal integration at higher levels in the auditory system. However, the difference in predictions between the adaptation and integration models is relatively small, meaning that influence of adaptation cannot be ruled out.     

Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers

In the present study, speech-recognition performance was measured in four hearing-impaired subjects and twelve normal hearers. The normal hearers were divided into four groups of three subjects each. Speech-recognition testing for the normal hearers was accomplished in a background of spectrally shaped noise in which the noise was shaped to produce masked thresholds identical to the quiet thresholds of one of the hearing-impaired subjects. The question addressed in this study is whether normal hearers with a hearing loss simulated through a shaped masking noise demonstrate speech-recognition difficulties similar to those of listeners with actual hearing impairment. Regarding overall percent-correct scores, the results indicated that two of the four hearing-impaired subjects performed better than their corresponding subgroup of noise-masked normal hearers, whereas the other two impaired listeners performed like the noise-masked normal listeners. A gross analysis of the types of errors made suggested that subjects with actual and simulated losses frequently made different types of errors.     

Lateralization and frequency selectivity in normal and impaired hearing

The onset-time difference delta T required to lateralize a 30-ms bifrequency tone burst toward the leading ear was measured as a function of the frequency difference delta F between the tone in the left ear and the tone in the right ear. At center frequencies of 0.5 and 4 kHz, four normal listeners tested at 80 and 100 dB SPL had delta Ts that were relatively constant at subcritical delta Fs, but increased at delta Fs wider than a critical band. At 1 kHz, delta T increased with delta F even at subcritical delta Fs. Ten listeners with cochlear impairments were tested at 100 dB SPL. Seven had normal delta Ts at 4 kHz, despite hearing losses between 50 and 70 dB. At 0.5 and 1 kHz, mildly impaired listeners had nearly normal lateralization functions, whereas more severely imparied listeners had very large delta Ts and no frequency selectivity. These and other findings indicate that listeners even with moderate to severe hearing losses can lateralize normally on the basis of interaural differences in onset envelope, but not on the basis of temporal differences in the fine structure.     

Temporal decline of masking and comodulation detection differences

Comodulation detection differences (CDDs) were studied using flanking bands that were either gated simultaneously with the signal band (burst) or gated at varying times prior to signal onset (fringed). Used for these experiments were a signal band centered at 1250 Hz and four flanking bands centered at 450, 850, 1650, and 2050 Hz; all bands were 100 Hz wide. In different conditions, the temporal envelope of the signal band was either the same as (correlated), or different from (uncorrelated), the common envelope of the four flanking bands, or the temporal envelopes of all of the bands were different (all-uncorrelated). For 8 of the 13 listeners, signal detectability improved by as much as 25 dB as the temporal fringe of the flanking bands was increased from 5 to about 700 ms. This temporal decline of masking was similar, but not identical, for the correlated, uncorrelated, and all-uncorrelated conditions. Results of this sort are reminiscent of several related findings that have been attributed to auditory adaptation or enhancement, or to a temporally developing critical-band filter. The other 5 of the 13 listeners were generally more sensitive than the majority, and they showed little or no improvement in detectability as fringe duration was varied. Large individual differences of this sort are not uncommon in the adaptation and comodulation literatures. As signal duration was changed from 50 to 240 ms, temporal integration was less in the correlated condition than in the uncorrelated condition, thereby producing a larger CDD with the longer signal. When the fringe followed the observation interval instead of preceding it, the results were equivocal because detectability improved for the majority of subjects and worsened for the minority. In follow-up experiments, different subsets of these four flanking bands were used. When temporal gaps of varying duration were inserted into the flanking band(s) immediately prior to the observation intervals, it was found that a temporal gap as long as 355 ms was not sufficient to reset the mechanisms underlying the temporal decline of masking.     

Enhancements of the edges of temporal masking functions by complex patterns of overshoot and undershoot

The purpose of this report is to present new data that provide a novel perspective on temporal masking, different from that found in the classical auditory literature on this topic. Specifically, measurement conditions are presented that minimize rather than maximize temporal spread of masking for a gated (200-ms) narrow-band (405-Hz-wide) noise masker logarithmically centered at 2500 Hz. Masked detection thresholds were measured for brief sinusoids in a two-interval, forced-choice (21FC) task. Detection was measured at each of 43 temporal positions within the signal observation interval for the sinusoidal signal presented either preceding, during, or following the gating of the masker, which was centered temporally within each 500-ms observation interval. Results are presented for three listeners; first, for detection of a 1900-Hz signal across a range of masker component levels (0-70 dB SPL) and, second, for masked detection as a function of signal frequency (fs = 500-5000 Hz) for a fixed masker component level (40 dB SPL). For signals presented off-frequency from the masker, and at low-to-moderate masker levels, the resulting temporal masking functions are characterized by sharp temporal edges. The sharpness of the edges is accentuated by complex patterns of temporal overshoot and undershoot, corresponding with diminished and enhanced detection, respectively, at both masker onset and offset. This information about the onset and offset timing of the gated masker is faithfully represented in the temporal masking functions over the full decade range of signal frequencies (except for fs=2500 Hz presented at the center frequency of the masker). The precise representation of the timing information is remarkable considering that the temporal envelope characteristics of the gated masker are evident in the remote masking response at least two octaves below the frequencies of the masker at a cochlear place where little or no masker activity would be expected. This general enhancement of the temporal edges of the masking response is reminiscent of spectral edge enhancement by lateral suppression/inhibition.     

Level discrimination as a function of level for tones from 0.25 to 16 kHz

Difference limens for level (delta L in dB = 20 log [(p + delta p)/p], where p is pressure) were measured as a function of level for tones at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 kHz. At each frequency, test levels encompassed the range from near threshold to 95 dB SPL in steps of 10 dB or smaller. The stimulus duration was 500 ms and the interstimulus interval was 250 ms. An adaptive two-alternative forced-choice procedure with feedback was used. Results for six normal listeners show individual differences among listeners, but the general trends seen in the average data clearly are present in the individual data and show the following. First, the delta Ls at all but the highest frequencies are generally smaller at high levels than at low levels. Second, the delta Ls at equal SPLs are largely independent of frequency up to about 4 kHz, but increase with frequency above 4 kHz. Third, at 8 and 10 kHz, the delta Ls are clearly nonmonotonic functions of level, showing consistent deterioration in the mid-level delta Ls relative to the low- and high-level delta Ls. The present data are discussed qualitatively in terms of current models of level discrimination.     

Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment

The goal of this study was to determine the extent to which the difficulty experienced by impaired listeners in understanding noisy speech can be explained on the basis of elevated tone-detection thresholds. Twenty-one impaired ears of 15 subjects, spanning a variety of audiometric configurations with average hearing losses to 75 dB, were tested for reception of consonants in a speech-spectrum noise. Speech level, noise level, and frequency-gain characteristic were varied to generate a range of listening conditions. Results for impaired listeners were compared to those of normal-hearing listeners tested under the same conditions with extra noise added to approximate the impaired listeners' detection thresholds. Results for impaired and normal listeners were also compared on the basis of articulation indices. Consonant recognition by this sample of impaired listeners was generally comparable to that of normal-hearing listeners with similar threshold shifts listening under the same conditions. When listening conditions were equated for articulation index, there was no clear dependence of consonant recognition on average hearing loss. Assuming that the primary consequence of the threshold simulation in normals is loss of audibility (as opposed to suprathreshold discrimination or resolution deficits), it is concluded that the primary source of difficulty in listening in noise for listeners with moderate or milder hearing impairments, aside from the noise itself, is the loss of audibility.     

Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners

This study investigated the effect of pulsatile stimulation rate on medial vowel and consonant recognition in cochlear implant listeners. Experiment 1 measured phoneme recognition as a function of stimulation rate in six Nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners using an experimental four-channel continuous interleaved sampler (CIS) speech processing strategy. Results showed that all stimulation rates from 150 to 500 pulses/s/electrode produced equally good performance, while stimulation rates lower than 150 pulses/s/electrode produced significantly poorer performance. Experiment 2 measured phoneme recognition by implant listeners and normal-hearing listeners as a function of the low-pass cutoff frequency for envelope information. Results from both acoustic and electric hearing showed no significant difference in performance for all cutoff frequencies higher than 20 Hz. Both vowel and consonant scores dropped significantly when the cutoff frequency was reduced from 20 Hz to 2 Hz. The results of these two experiments suggest that temporal envelope information can be conveyed by relatively low stimulation rates. The pattern of results for both electrical and acoustic hearing is consistent with a simple model of temporal integration with an equivalent rectangular duration (ERD) of the temporal integrator of about 7 ms.     

Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss

Psychoacoustical tuning curves and interaural pitch matches were measured in a listener with a unilateral, moderately severe hearing loss of primarily cochlear origin below 2 kHz. The psychoacoustical tuning curves, measured in a simultaneous-masking paradigm, were obtained at 1 kHz for probe levels of 4.5-, 7-, and 13-dB SL in the impaired ear, and 7-dB SL in the impaired ear, and 7-dB SL in the normal ear. Results show that as the level of the probe increased from 4.5- to 13-dB SL in the impaired ear, (1) the frequency location of the tip of the tuning curve decreased from approximately 2.85 to 2.20 kHz and (2) the lowest level of the masker required to just mask the probe increased from 49- to 83-dB SPL. The tuning curve in the normal ear was comparable to data from other normal listeners. The interaural pitch matches were measured from 0.5 to 6 kHz at 10-dB SL in the impaired ear and approximately 15- to 20-dB SL in the normal ear. Results show reasonable identity matches (e.g., a 500-Hz tone in the impaired ear was matched close to a 500-Hz tone in the normal ear), although variability was significantly greater for pitch matches below 2 kHz. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for models of pitch perception.     

Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments

The shape of the auditory filter was estimated at three center frequencies, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz, for five subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. Additional measurements were made at 1.0 kHz using one subject with a unilateral impairment and six subjects with bilateral impairments. Subjects were chosen who had thresholds in the impaired ears which were relatively flat as a function of frequency and ranged from 15 to 70 dB HL. The filter shapes were estimated by measuring thresholds for sinusoidal signals (frequency f) in the presence of two bands of noise, 0.4 f wide, one above and one below f. The spectrum level of the noise was 50 dB (re: 20 mu Pa) and the noise bands were placed both symmetrically and asymmetrically about the signal frequency. The deviation of the nearer edge of each noise band from f varied from 0.0 to 0.8 f. For the normal ears, the filters were markedly asymmetric for center frequencies of 1.0 and 2.0 kHz, the high-frequency branch being steeper. At 0.5 kHz, the filters were more symmetric. For the impaired ears, the filter shapes varied considerably from one subject to another. For most subjects, the lower branch of the filter was much less steep than normal. The upper branch was often less steep than normal, but a few subjects showed a near normal upper branch. For the subjects with unilateral impairments, the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of the filter was always greater for the impaired ear than for the normal ear at each center frequency. For three subjects at 0.5 kHz and one subject at 1.0 kHz, the filter had too little selectivity for its shape to be determined.