Characterization of the stable and metastable poly(ethylene oxide)–urea complexes in electrospun fibers

Solution electrospinning was used for the first time to prepare nanofibers of the stable (α) and metastable (β) complexes between poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and urea. Both types of fibers were highly crystalline and presented a large level of molecular orientation. Detailed characterization of the ill‐studied β complex was performed using wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD), infrared spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Results reveal that it possesses a 3:2 PEO:urea stoichiometry and suggest that it belongs to the orthorhombic system with a = 1.907 nm, b = 0.862 nm, and c = 0.773 nm. The PEO chains are oriented along the fiber axis and present a conformation significantly affected by strong hydrogen bonding with urea when compared with the pure polymer and the stable complex. A layered structure model is suggested for the metastable complex, in which the urea molecules would be arranged into a ribbon‐like structure intercalated between two PEO layers. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 46: 1903–1913, 2008     

An NMR investigation of the interaction of polyethylene oxide with water‐soluble poly(vinyl phenol‐co‐potassium styrene sulfonate)

The water‐soluble complex of polyethylene oxide (PEO) with poly (vinyl phenol‐co‐potassium styrene sulfonate) (PVPh‐co‐KSS) was studied by liquid‐state NMR. PEO showed two peaks in the ¹H spectra, which corresponded to the free and complexed PEO. The ratio of the free PEO/complexed PEO was decreased with the increase in the mixing ratio of PVPh‐co‐KSS/PEO. Some of the complex formation disappeared when the pH was raised from 6.4 to 12.0. It had been thought that at high pH, the phenolic groups dissociate and thus cannot form hydrogen bonds. The fact that NMR indicates some interaction at pH 12.0 implies there are some other interactions, such as hydrophobic interactions between the aromatic rings and the polyether methylene groups, contributing to PEO and PVPh‐co‐KSS complex formation. Nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) cross peaks were observed between PEO and the aromatic protons of PVPh‐co‐KSS in nuclear Overhauser effect spectra (NOESY) suggesting that the distance between PEO and the aromatic protons of PVPh‐co‐KSS was less than 5 Å. The exchange between the complexed PEO and the free PEO was slow on the NMR time scale. The ratio of the integral of the complexed PEO to the free PEO increased with temperature, indicating that the number of PEO segments interacting with the aromatic ring increases with temperature. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 1276–1284, 2000     

Morphology and crystal structure of the poly(ethylene oxide)–hydroquinone molecular complex

The occurrence of a molecular complex between poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and p‐dihydroxybenzene (hydroquinone) has been determined using different experimental techniques such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). From DSC investigations, an ethylene oxide/hydroquinone molar ratio of 2/1 was deduced. During the heating, the molecular complex undergoes a peritectic reaction and spontaneously transforms into a liquid phase and crystalline hydroquinone (incongruent melting). A triclinic unit cell (a = 1.17 nm, b = 1.20 nm, c = 1.06 nm, α = 78°, β = 64°, γ = 115°), containing eight ethylene oxide (EO) monomers and four hydroquinone molecules, has been determined from the analysis of the X‐ray diffraction fiber patterns of stretched and spherulitic films. The PEO chains adopt a helical conformation with four monomers per turn, which is very similar to the 7₂ helix of the pure polymer. A crystal structure is proposed on the basis of molecular packing considerations and X‐ray diffraction intensities. It consists of a layered structure with an alternation of PEO and small molecules layers, both layers being stabilized by an array of hydrogen bonds. The morphology of PEO–HYD crystals was studied by small angle X‐ray scattering and DSC. As previously shown for the PEO–resorcinol complex, PEO–HYD samples crystallize with a lamellar thickness corresponding to fully extended or integral folded chains. The relative proportion of lamellae with different thicknesses depends on the crystallization temperature and time. Finally, the observed morphologies are discussed in terms of intermolecular interactions and chain mobility. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 37: 1197–1208, 1999     

Conductivity enhancement mechanism of the poly(ethylene oxide)/modified‐clay/LiClO4 systems

This study demonstrates that adding clay that was organically modified by dimethyldioctadecylammonium chloride (DDAC) and d2000 surfactants increases the ionic conductivity of polymeric electrolyte. A.C. impedance, differential scanning calorimetric (DSC), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) studies revealed that the silicate layers strongly interact with the dopant salt lithium perchlorate (LiClO₄) within a poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)/clay/LiClO₄ system. DSC characterization verified that the addition of a small amount of the organic clay reduces the glass‐transition temperature of PEO as a result of the interaction between the negative charge in the clay and the lithium cation. Additionally, the strength of such a specific interaction depends on the extent of PEO intercalation. With respect to the interaction between the silicate layer and the lithium cation, three types of complexes are assumed. In complex I, lithium cation is distributed within the PEO phase. In complex II, lithium cation resides in an PEO/exfoliated‐clay environment. In complex III, the lithium cation is located in PEO/agglomerated‐clay domains. More clay favors complex III over complexes II and I, reducing the interaction between the silicate layers and the lithium cations because of strong self‐aggregation among the silicate layers. Notably, the (PEO)₈LiClO₄/DDAC‐modified clay (DDAC‐mClay) composition can form a nanocomposite electrolyte with high ionic conductivity (8 × 10^?5 S/cm) at room temperature. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40: 1342–1353, 2002     

Silicone‐urethane membranes for lithium batteries. Part 1. Moisture‐cured poly(siloxane‐urethane‐urea) elastomers containing polyethylene oxide (PEO) segments – synthesis and characterization as potential membrane materials

Poly(siloxane‐urethane‐urea) elastomers containing both polysiloxane and polyethylene oxide (PEO) segments in the polymer chain were obtained by moisture‐curing of NCO‐terminated poly(siloxane‐urethane) prepolymers synthesized from isophorone diisocyanate and mixtures of polyoxyethylene diols and polysiloxane diols with various molecular weights. Mechanical properties of the moisture‐cured films and their swelling ability in solvent mixtures commonly used in lithium batteries were investigated, and it was found that they were greatly influenced by PEO content in the polymer. PEO content in the polymer was also found to affect very much the electric conductivity of the films after immersion in lithium salt solution in ethylene carbonate–dimethyl carbonate solvent mixture. At high contents of PEO in the polymer chain specific conductivities of the films in a range of 10^?3, Scm^?1 could be achieved at room temperature. Based on the results of Scanning Electron Microscopy with X‐ray Analysis (SEM/EDS) investigations and wide‐angle X‐ray scattering and small‐angle X‐ray scattering studies, it could be anticipated that the reason for good conductivity of the films might be their specific supramolecular structure that potentially facilitated lithium ion mobility. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Single Lithium‐Ion Conducting Polymer Electrolytes Based on a Super‐Delocalized Polyanion

A novel single lithium‐ion (Li‐ion) conducting polymer electrolyte is presented that is composed of the lithium salt of a polyanion, poly[(4‐styrenesulfonyl)(trifluoromethyl(S‐trifluoromethylsulfonylimino)sulfonyl)imide] (PSsTFSI^?), and high‐molecular‐weight poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). The neat LiPSsTFSI ionomer displays a low glass‐transition temperature (44.3 °C; that is, strongly plasticizing effect). The complex of LiPSsTFSI/PEO exhibits a high Li‐ion transference number (t_Li⁺=0.91) and is thermally stable up to 300 °C. Meanwhile, it exhibits a Li‐ion conductivity as high as 1.35×10^?4 S cm^?1 at 90 °C, which is comparable to that for the classic ambipolar LiTFSI/PEO SPEs at the same temperature. These outstanding properties of the LiPSsTFSI/PEO blended polymer electrolyte would make it promising as solid polymer electrolytes for Li batteries.     

Thermosensitive sol–gel transition behaviors of poly(ethylene oxide)/aliphatic polyester/poly(ethylene oxide) aqueous solutions

The thermoreversible gelation of Pluronic [poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)–polypropylene oxide (PPO)–PEO] aqueous solutions originates from micelle formation and micelle volume changes due to PEO–water and PPO–water lower critical solution temperature behavior. The micelle volume fraction is known to dominate the sol–gel transition behavior of Pluronic aqueous solutions. Triblock copolymers of PEO and aliphatic polyesters, instead of PPO, were prepared by hexamethylene diisocyanate coupling and dicyclohexyl carbodiimide coupling. Through changes in the molecular weight and hydrophobicity of the polyester middle block, the hydrophobic–hydrophilic balance of each block was systematically controlled. The following aliphatic polyesters were used: poly(hexamethylene adipate) (PHA), poly(ethylene adipate) (PEA), and poly(ethylene succinate) (PESc). With the hydrophobicity and molecular weight of the middle block increasing, the critical micelle concentration at the same critical micelle temperature decreased, and the absolute value of the micellization free energy increased. The micelle size was rather insensitive to temperature but slightly decreased with increasing temperature. PEO–PHA–PEO and PEO–PEA–PEO triblock copolymers needed high polymer concentrations to form gels. This was ascribed to the tight aggregation of PHA and PEA chains in the micelle core due to strong hydrophobic interactions, which induced the contraction of the micelle core. However, because of the relatively hydrophilic core, a PEO–PESc–PEO aqueous solution showed gelation at a low polymer concentration. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 772–784, 2004     

Crystallization behavior and toughening mechanism of poly(ethylene oxide) in polyoxymethylene/poly(ethylene oxide) crystalline/crystalline blends

In this study, the unique crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) in polyoxymethylene (POM)/PEO crystalline/crystalline blends was examined in detail. This study was the first to report the typical fractionated crystallization of PEO in POM/PEO blends when PEO is fewer than 30 wt.%. The delayed crystallization temperature of PEO was confirmed at about 5°C to 14°C by using differential scanning calorimetry and perturbation–correlation moving‐window 2D correlation IR spectroscopy. Wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction indicates that no new crystal structures or co‐crystals were generated in POM/PEO. The statistical calculations of scanning electron microscopy photos show that the average diameter of PEO particles is 0.227 µm to 1.235 µm and that the number of small particles is as many as 10⁹ magnitudes per cm³. Theory analysis establishes that the delayed crystallization of PEO is a heterogeneous nucleation process and not a homogeneous nucleation process. A significant toughening effect of PEO to POM was also observed. The impact strength of POM/PEO acquires a maximum of 10.5 kJ/m² when PEO content is 5%. The impact strength of the blend increases by 78.0% compared with pure POM. To improve the toughening effect, the best particle size is established between 0.352 and 0.718 µm, with a PEO particle spacing of 0.351 µm to 0.323 µm. The number of corresponding particles was 0.887 × 10⁹ per cm3 to 3.240 × 10⁹ per cm³. A PEO toughening model for POM was proposed to provide a new and effective way to solve the problem of POM toughening. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

High-molecular-weight polyterephthalamide by direct polycondensation reaction in the presence of poly(ethylene oxide)

Polyterephthalamides of high molecular weight (η_inh up to 1.9) were obtained by the direct polycondensation reaction of terephthalic acid and aromatic diamines in the presence of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with triphenyl phosphite in a N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP)–pyridine solution that contained lithium chloride. The molecular weights of the polymers produced varied with the amount and molecular weight of PEO, which showed maximum values when PEO with a molecular weight of 2.0 × 10⁴?5.0 × 10⁵ was used in a concentration of about 0.5 wt % in the solvent. The polycondensation reaction was significantly affected by the level of pyridine in a mixed solvent of NMP and pyridine and by the concentration of the lithium chloride added.     

Proton NMR investigation of the local dynamics of PEO in PEO/PMMA blends

Longitudinal relaxation of proton magnetisation was used to characterize the molecular motions of PEO chains in compatible PEO (hydrogenated)/PMMA (deuterated) blends. Both the temperature and the PEO concentration, Φ, were varied. A maximum in the spin–lattice relaxation rate was observed and its properties were analyzed as a function of Φ. For Φ ≤ 0.50, the maximum is observed below the glass transition temperature of the blend; this shows that PEO chains dispersed in a matrix of PMMA remain highly mobile on a local scale even below T_g(Φ). A frequency–temperature correspondence procedure, applied to the measurements performed at two Larmor frequencies, 32 and 60 MHz, leads to a characteristic correlation time for PEO molecular motions. Its temperature dependence obeys a WLF free volume relation above the glass transition of the blends. The PEO free volume fraction and its thermal expansion are strongly reduced by the presence of the PMMA chains. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 35: 1095–1105, 1997     

Synthesis and Characterization of α,ω‐bi[2,4‐dinitrophenyl (DNP)] poly(2‐methoxystyrene) Functional Polymers. Initial Evaluation of the Interaction of the Functional Polymers with RBL Mast Cells

Two series of functional polymers, α,ω‐bi[2,4‐dinitrophenyl][poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(2‐methoxystyrene)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide)] (DNP‐PEO‐P2MS‐PEO‐DNP) and α,ω‐bi[2,4‐dinitrophenyl caproic][poly(ethylene oxide)‐b‐poly(2‐methoxystyrene)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide)] (CDNP‐PEO‐P2MS‐PEO‐CDNP), were synthesized by anionic living polymerization. The polymers were characterized by FT‐IR, ¹H‐NMR and Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC). The molecular weight distributions for the lower molecular weight functional polymers were slightly broad (1.3–1.5). However, the molecular weight distributions for higher molecular weight polymers were narrower (1.1–1.2). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) studies showed thermal transitions indicative of the presence of microphases in the polymer solid state. The polymers were white powders and soluble in tetrahydrofuran. The binding affinity of DNP‐PEO‐P2MS‐PEO‐DNP ligands towards anti DNP IgE was determined by titrations with fluorescently labeled FITC‐IgE. A water soluble CDNP‐PEO‐P2MS‐PEO‐CDNP/DMEG (dimethoxyethylene glycol) complex binds and achieves steady state binding with solution IgE within a few seconds. This strongly suggests that CDNP functional polymers with improved water solubility have potential in therapeutics. Higher molecular weight (water insoluble) CDNP‐PEO‐P2MS‐PEO‐CDNP polymers were electrosprayed as fibers (500 nm) on silicon surface. Fluorescence spectroscopy clearly showed that RBL mast cells were interacting with the fibers suggesting that the cell‐surface receptors were clustered along the fiber surface. These observations suggest that the functional polymers hold promise for developing an antibody detection device.     

Structure and rheology of hyperbranched and dendritic polymers. II. Effects of blending acetylated and hydroxy‐terminated poly(propyleneimine) dendrimers with aqueous poly(ethylene oxide) solutions

The effect of adding acetylated poly(propyleneimine) dendrimers to the structure and rheology of aqueous solutions of high molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) was investigated by rheology and small‐angle neutron scattering in a temperature range of 10–40 °C. In the semidilute regime, the steady shear rheology of PEO solutions was unmodified by the addition of dendrimers at a comparable weight concentration. At the highest concentrations studied, the addition of acetylated dendrimers suppressed the onset of a low‐frequency elastic modulus at the lowest temperature investigated. For comparison, the addition of PEO of a comparable molecular weight at the same weight fraction resulted in a milder suppression but, unlike the dendrimers, greatly increased the solution viscosity. The addition of acetylated dendrimers to a semidilute PEO solution at 10 °C substantially reduced the solution turbidity. These effects on the rheology and optical properties were confirmed by small‐angle neutron scattering measurements of the molecular structure of the mixture. Additional SANS measurements in the dilute regime (0.1 wt % PEO) showed quantitatively that the dendrimers decorated the PEO chains in a necklace structure, such as that observed previously for micelles. The results suggested a mechanism of rheology modification whereby the dendrimers disrupted the association network structure in the PEO solution at lower temperatures by preferentially associating with the PEO chains in solution. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 874–882, 2000     

Spin label study of phase morphology and polymer segmental motion in poly(acrylic acid)–poly(ethylene oxide) complex

The ESR lineshapes of nitroxide radical end‐labeled on poly(ethylene oxide) (SLPEO) for the pure polymer and for different weight ratio complexes with poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) were studied as a function of temperature. For SLPEO one spectral component was detected in the entire temperature range, indicating that the spin label was in the homogeneous phase domain. For all PAA–PEO complexes two spectral components with different rates of motion, a ‘fast’ and a ‘slow’ component, were observed, which indicates the existence of microheterogeneity at the molecular level: the more mobile the PEO‐rich microphase, the more rigid is the PAA‐rich microphase. On the other hand, the SLPEO polymer segmental motion was restricted owing to the hydrogen bond interaction between the carboxyl proton in PAA and the ether oxygen in PEO. This restriction was exacerbated with increasing the PAA content in the complex, which could be further substantiated through the calculated S and τ_c values. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Direct polycondensation of hydroxybenzoic acids with diphenyl chlorophosphate in the presence of ethers

The effects of a modification of the relative reactivity of carboxyl groups to hydroxy groups in monomers on the direct polycondensation of hydroxybenzoic acids was investigated. Polycondensation with diphenyl chlorophosphate (DPCP) was largely promoted by carrying out the reaction in the presence of ethers which are capable of complexing with carboxyl groups in the monomers. The amount of alkyl ethers, such as, poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) corresponding to an equivalent unit mole of carboxyl groups was effectively added. The molecular weights of the polymers produced increased with the higher molecular weights of PEO, showing maximum values by use of PEO of 1–2.5 × 10⁵.     

Ab initio quantum chemistry and molecular dynamics simulations studies of LiPF6/poly(ethylene oxide) interactions

Ab initio and molecular mechanics studies of LiPF₆ and the interaction of the salt with the poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) oligomer dimethylether have been performed. Optimized geometries and energies of Li⁺/PF₆^? complexes obtained from quantum chemistry revealed a preference for C_3V symmetry structures for Li⁺–P separations under 2.8 Å, C_2V symmetry for Li⁺–P in the range of 2.8–3.3 Å and C_4V symmetry for Li⁺–P separations larger than 3.3 Å. Electron correlation effects were found to make an insignificant contribution to binding in the Li⁺/PF₆^? complex. By contrast, analogous studies of PF₆^?/PF₆^? and PF₆^?/dimethyl ether complexes revealed important contributions of electron correlation to the complex interaction energy. A molecular mechanics force field for simulations of PEO/LiPF₆ melts was parameterized to reproduce the geometries and energies of Li⁺/PF₆^?, PF₆^?/PF₆^?, PF₆^?/dimethylether complexes. Molecular dynamics simulations of PEO/LiPF₆ melts were performed to validate this quantum chemistry‐based force field. Accurate reproduction of the increase in solution density with addition of salt was found while the electrical conductivity of PEO/LiPF₆ solutions was found to be within an order of magnitude of the experimental values. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 22: 641–654, 2001     

Synthesis of a water‐soluble diblock copolymer of polysulfonic diphenyl aniline and poly(ethylene oxide)

We report the synthesis of a water‐soluble diblock copolymer composed of polysulfonic diphenyl aniline (PSDA) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), which was prepared by reacting an amine‐terminated PSDA and tosylate PEO (PEO‐Tos). First, a HCl‐mediated polymerization of sulfonic diphenyl aniline monomer with the formation of HCl‐doped PSDA was carried out. After its neutralization and reduction, a secondary amine‐functionalized PSDA was obtained. Second, PEO‐Tos was synthesized via the tosylation of the monohydroxyl PEO methyl ether with tosylol chloride. Diblock copolymers with various PEO segment lengths (PSDA‐b‐PEO‐350 and PSDA‐b‐PEO‐2000) were obtained with PEO‐350 [number‐average molecular weight (M_n) = 350] and PEO‐2000 (M_n = 2000). The prepolymers and diblock copolymers were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, NMR, mass spectrometry, and ultraviolet–visible light. They had relatively low conductivities, ranging from 10^?6 to 10^?3 S/cm, because of the withdrawing effect of the sulfonic group as well as the steric effects of the bulky aromatic substitutuents at the N sites of the polyaniline backbone and of the PEO block. These polymers were self‐doped, and an intermolecular self‐doping was suggested. The external doping was, however, more effective. The self‐doping induced aggregation in water among the PSDA backbones, which was also stimulated by the presence of hydrophilic PEO blocks. Furthermore, the electrical conductivities of the diblock copolymers were strongly temperature‐dependent. PSDA‐b‐PEO‐2000 exhibited about one order of magnitude increase in conductivity upon heating from 32 to 57 °C. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 2179–2191, 2004     

Thermal decomposition and kinetics studies on poly(BDFAO/THF), poly(DFAMO/THF), and poly(BDFAO/DFAMO/THF)

The thermal behavior of kaolinite–urea intercalation complex was investigated by thermogravimetry–differential scanning calorimetry (TG–DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). In addition, the interaction mode of urea molecules intercalated into the kaolinite gallery was studied by means of molecular dynamics simulation. Three main mass losses were observed at 136 °C, in the range of 210–270 °C, and at 500 °C in the TG–DSC curves, which were, respectively, attributed to (1) melting of the surface-adsorbed urea, (2) removal of the intercalated urea, and (3) dehydroxylation of the deintercalated kaolinite. The three DSC endothermic peaks at 218, 250, and 261 °C were related to the successive removals of intercalated urea with three different distribution structures. Based on the angle between the dipole moment vector of urea and the basal surface of kaolinite, the three urea models could be described as follows: (1) Type A, the dipole moment vector is nearly parallel to the basal surface of kaolinite; (2) Type B, the dipole moment vector points to the silica tetrahedron with the angle between it and the basal surface of kaolinite ranging from 20°to 40°; and (3) Type C, the dipole moment vector is nearly perpendicular to the basal surface of kaolinite. The three distribution structures of urea molecules were validated by the results of the molecular dynamics simulation. Furthermore, the thermal behavior of the kaolinite–urea intercalation complex investigated by TG–DSC was also supported by FTIR and XRD analyses.     

Solid polymers doped with rare earth metal salts. I. Complex formation and morphology in the neodymium chloride–poly(ethylene oxide) system

The complex formation and morphology of the NdCl₃?PEO system have been investigated. Peak shifts, peak broadening, and the appearance of new peaks in the 800–1200 cm^?1 range of the infrared (IR) spectra, by comparison with what is observed with pure PEO, unequivocally demonstrates complex formation. Although the NdCl₃?PEO complex is found to be highly hygroscopic, residual moisture can be removed reversibly, thereby permitting the role of water in affecting the morphology of the solid film to be examined. As elucidated with infrared, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, and hot-stage polarized optical microscopy, under anhydrous conditions the resultant complex is amorphous at an EO/NdCl₃ ratio approximately less than ca. 8; but above this critical value the PEO in excess of the stoichiometric ratio required for complexation tends to form a separate crystalline phase. Furthermore, water was found to compete with the ethylene oxide unit for complexation with Nd³⁺, resulting in phase-separated PEO with a tendency toward crystallinity. The glass transition temperature of the complex is found to increase sigmoidally with the NdCl₃ content, an observation further substantiating complexation between NdCl₃ and PEO.     

Preparation of poly(ethylene oxide) star polymers and poly(ethylene oxide)–polystyrene heteroarm star polymers by atom transfer radical polymerization

Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) star polymer with a microgel core was prepared by atom transfer radical poylmerization (ATRP) of divinyl benzene (DVB) with mono‐2‐bromoisobutyryl PEO ester as a macroinitiator. Several factors, such as the feed ratio of DVB to the initiator, type of catalysts, and purity of DVB, play important roles during star formation. The crosslinked poly(divinyl benzene) (PDVB) core was further obtained by the hydrolysis of PEO star to remove PEO arms. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) traces revealed the bare core has a broad molecular weight distribution. PEO–polystyrene (PS) heteroarm star polymer was synthesized through grafting PS from the core of PEO star by another ATRP of styrene (St) because of the presence of initiating groups in the core inherited from PEO star. Characterizations by SEC, ¹H NMR, and DSC revealed the successful preparation of the target star copolymers. Scanning electron microscopy images suggested that PEO–PS heteroarm star can form spherical micelles in water/tetrahydrofuran mixture solvents, which further demonstrated the amphiphilic nature of the star polymer. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 2263–2271, 2004     

Proton‐conducting polymer membrane based on sulfonated polystyrene microspheres and an amphiphilic polymer blend

A new type of amphiphic polymer blend comprising polystyrene (PS), polyethylene oxide (PEO) and microspheres of crosslinked polystyrene sulfonic acid (PSSA) was prepared by solution blending and followed by casting. Besides providing protons, PSSA plays a role in enhancing the miscibility of polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene oxide (PEO) according to the IR and the DSC studies. The resulting polymer blend is a proton electrolyte. The influence of the mixing extent between PS and PEO on the proton conductivity has been studied. It is also found that for those samples in which PEO and PS mix well, the hydrophobic PS component can effectively prevent water evaporation from the hydrophilic components at elevated temperatures, and therefore preserve the proton conductivity (10⁻⁴ S/cm) at the temperature as high as 80 °C. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 1530–1538, 2000