Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Ansa‐Complexes of [Mn(η5‐C5H5)(η6‐C6H6)]: Preparation,Characterization, and Reactivity of [n]Manganoarenophanes (n=1, 2, 3)

We report the synthesis of [n]manganoarenophanes (n=1, 2) featuring boron, silicon, germanium, and tin as ansa‐bridging elements. Their preparation was achieved by salt‐elimination reactions of the dilithiated precursor [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄Li)(η⁶‐C₆H₅Li)]?pmdta (pmdta=N,N,N′,N′,N′′‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine) with corresponding element dichlorides. Besides characterization by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis, the identity of two single‐atom‐bridged derivatives, [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] and [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SiPh₂], could also be determined by X‐ray structural analysis. We investigated for the first time the reactivity of these ansa‐cyclopentadienyl–benzene manganese compounds. The reaction of the distannyl‐bridged complex [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)Sn₂tBu₄] with elemental sulfur was shown to proceed through the expected oxidative addition of the Sn?Sn bond to give a triatomic ansa‐bridge. The investigation of the ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) capability of [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] with [Pt(PEt₃)₃] showed that an unexpected, unselective insertion into the C_ipso?Sn bonds of [Mn(η⁵‐C₅H₄)(η⁶‐C₆H₅)SntBu₂] had occurred.     

[(η5‐C5R5)TiCl2(η5‐C5H4SiMe2)]2O·nCH2Cl2

The first title metallocene, 1,3‐bis(dichlorotitanocene)‐1,1,3,3‐tetramethyldisiloxane dichloromethane solvate, [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)­TiCl₂­(η⁵‐C₅H₄­Si­Me₂)]₂O·­CH₂Cl₂, (I), crystallizes in space group P2₁/c. Compound (I) represents the first crystal structure of a bimetallic siloxy‐bridged titanocene. The geometric parameters of (I) are similar to those of the parent titanocene; however, the disiloxane substituents adopt an unexpected eclipsed conformation. The second title metallocene, 1,3‐bis­[(penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl)­(cyclo­penta­dien­yl)­titanium dichloride]‐1,1,3,3‐tetra­methyl­disiloxane, [(η⁵‐C₅‐Me₅)­TiCl₂­(η⁵‐C₅H₄­Si­Me₂)]₂O, (II), represents the second crystal structure of a bimetallic siloxy‐bridged titanocene and crystallizes in the space group P2₁/n. Compound (I) possesses non‐crystallographic twofold molecular symmetry and both metal centers adopt pseudo‐tetrahedral geometries. The geometric parameters of (II) are similar to those of the mixed titanocene Cp*CpTiCl₂ (Cp* = C₅Me₅) and the disiloxane substituents adopt a staggered conformation.     

[μ‐1κ2O,O′:2(η5)‐Cyclopentadienylcarboxylato][2(η5)‐diphenylphosphinocyclopentadienyl]bis[1,1(η5)‐tetramethylcyclopentadienyl]iron(II)titanium(III)

Reacting stoichiometric amounts of 1‐(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene­carboxylic acid and [Ti(η⁵‐C₅HMe₄)₂(η²‐Me₃SiC[triple‐bond]CSiMe₃)] produced the title carboxyl­atotitanocene complex, [{μ‐1κ²O,O′:2(η⁵)‐C₅H₄CO₂}{2(η⁵)‐C₅H₄P(C₆H₅)₂}{1(η⁵)‐C₅H(CH₃)₄}₂Fe^IITi^III] or [FeTi(C₉H₁₃)₂(C₆H₄O₂)(C₁₇H₁₄P)]. The angle subtended by the Ti/O/O′ plane, where O and O′ are the donor atoms of the κ²‐carboxy­late group, and the plane of the carboxyl‐substituted ferrocene cyclo­penta­dienyl is 24.93 (6)°.     

Molecular structures of a series of substituted bis(η5‐cyclopentadienyl)titanium dihalides CpR2TiX2 [X = F,Cl, Br and I; R = CHPh2, CH(p‐Tol)2 and adamantyl]

Metallocene dihalides and derivatives thereof are of great interest as precursors for catalysts in polymerization reactions, as antitumor agents and, due to their increased stability, as suitable starting materials in salt metathesis reactions and the generation of metallocene fragments. We report the synthesis and structural characterization of a series of eleven substituted bis(η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl)titanium dihalides, namely bis[η⁵‐1‐(diphenylmethyl)cyclopentadienyl]difluoridotitanium(IV), [Ti(C₁₈H₁₅)₂F₂], bis{η⁵‐1‐[bis(4‐methylphenyl)methyl]cyclopentadienyl}difluoridotitanium(IV), [Ti(C₂₀H₁₉)₂F₂], and bis{η⁵‐1‐[bis(adamantan‐2‐yl)methyl]cyclopentadienyl}difluoridotitanium(IV), [Ti(C₁₅H₁₉)₂F₂], together with the bromide and iodide analogues, and the chloride analogues of the diphenylmethyl and adamantyl complexes. These eleven complexes were prepared by the reaction of the corresponding bis(η⁵:η¹‐pentafulvene)titanium complexes with different hydrogen halides (Cl, Br and I). The titanocene fluorides become available via chloride–fluoride exchange reactions.     

Activation of SO2 with [(η5‐C5Me5)2Ln(THF)2] (Ln=Eu,Yb) Leading to Dithionite and Sulfinate Complexes

The reaction of decamethylytterbocene [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₂Yb(THF)₂] with SO₂ at low temperature gave two new compounds, namely, the Yb^III dithionite/sulfinate complex [{(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₂Yb(μ₃,1κ²O^1,3,2κ³O^2,2′,4‐S₂O₄)}₂{(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Yb(μ,1κO,2κO′‐C₅Me₅SO₂)}₂] ( 1 ) and the Yb^III dithionite complex [{(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₂Yb}₂(μ,1κ²O^1,3,2κ²O^2,4‐S₂O₄)] ( 2 ). After extraction of 1 , the mixture was heated to give the dinuclear tetrasulfinate complex [{(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Yb}₂(μ,κO,κO’‐C₅Me₅SO₂)₄] ( 3 a ). In contrast, from the reaction of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₂Eu(THF)₂] with SO₂ only the tetrasulfinate complex [{(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Eu}₂(μ,κO,κO’‐C₅Me₅SO₂)₄] ( 3 b ) was isolated. Two major reaction pathways were observed: 1) reductive coupling of two SO₂ molecules to form the dithionite anion S₂O₄^2?; and 2) nucleophilic attack of one metallocene C₅Me₅ ligand on the sulfur atom of SO₂. The compounds presented are the first dithionite and sulfinate complexes of the f‐elements.     

Heterobimetallische phosphanido-verbrückte Zweikern-Komplexe - Synthese von cis-rac-[(η-C5H4R)2Zr{μ-PH(2,4,6−iPr3C6H2)}2M(CO)4] (RMe,MCr,Mo; RH,MMo)

Heterobimetallic Phosphanido-bridged Dinuclear Complexes - Syntheses of cis-rac-[(η-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{μ-PH(2,4,6-ⁱPr₃C₆H₂)}₂M(CO)₄] (R?Me, M?Cr, Mo; R?H, M?Mo) The zirconocene bisphosphanido complexes [(η-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{PH(2,4,6-ⁱPr₃C₆H₂)}₂] (R?Me, H) react with [(NBD)M(CO)₄] (NBD?norbornadiene, M?Cr, Mo) to give only one diastereomer of the phosphanido-bridged heterobimetallic dinuclear complexes cis-rac-[(η-C₅H₄R)₂Zr{μ-PH(2,4,6-ⁱPr₃C₆H₂)}₂M(CO)₄] [R?Me, M?Cr ( 1 ), Mo ( 2 ); R?H, M?Mo ( 3 )]. However, no reaction was observed between [(η-C₅H₅)₂Zr{PH(2,4,6-^tBu₃ C₆H₂)}₂] and [Pt(PPh₃)₄]. 1—3 were characterised spectroscopically. For 1—3 , the presence of the racemic isomer was shown by NMR spectroscopy. No reaction was observed at room temperature for 3 and CS₂, (NO)BF₄, Me₃NO or PH(2,4,6-Me₃C₆H₂)₂. With Et₂AlH or PhC?CH decomposition of 3 was observed.     

Activation of Molecular Hydrogen by Bis(η5,η1‐pentafulvene)‐titanium Complexes – Efficient Formation of Titanium(III)hydrides

The synthesis and crystal structures of two dinuclear titanocene hydride complexes are reported. Both complexes, namely bis(η⁵‐(di‐para‐tolylmethyl)cyclopentadienyl)titanium hydride dimer, [(η⁵‐C₂₀H₁₉)₂Ti(μ‐H)]₂ ( 2a ), and bis(η⁵‐2‐adamantylcyclopentadienyl)‐titanium hydride dimer, [(η⁵‐C₁₅H₁₉)₂Ti(μ‐H)]₂ ( 2b ), are formed via activation of molecular hydrogen by the corresponding bis(η⁵,η¹‐pentafulvene)titanium complexes 1a and 1b at ambient temperatures and pressures in high yields. The hydride complexes 2a and 2b exhibit planar [Ti₂H₂] cores and, as a result of the heterolytic cleavage of molecular hydrogen, substituted Cp Ligands were formed during the reaction.     

Syntheses and supramolecular structures of two 5‐nitrosalicylate titanocene complexes

Two 4‐coordinated titanocene complexes, [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)₂Ti(O,O′)(5‐NO₂‐OCC₆H₃)] (I) and [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)₂Ti(2‐OH‐5‐NO₂‐O₂CC₆H₃)₂] (II), have been synthesized by reaction of Cp₂TiCl₂ and 5‐nitrosalicylic acid in aqueous media. Single‐crystal X‐ray analyses of I and II display the mononuclear forms of Ti^IV, and geometries at titanium atoms are distorted tetrahedrons, while the coordination environment at Ti^IV in complex I is different from that in complex II. Crystallographic characterization revealed that each of the complexes exhibits a three‐dimensional framework constructed through weak interactions, which are H‐bonding, π–π stacking and C–H·π interactions, but they differ greatly when forming the three‐dimensional network structure in both complexes. The results show that the dramatic change of conditions has great effect on the molecular structure of 5‐nitrosalicylate titanocene, thereby significantly influencing the weak interactions and the specific framework structure. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Preparation and Reactivity of Mo(NCMe)(η2‐C2Ph2)2(η4‐C4Ph4)

Reaction of Mo(CO)(η²‐C₂Ph₂)₂(η⁴‐C₄Ph₄) and Me₃NO in acetonitrile solvent affords Mo(NCMe)(η²‐C₂Ph₂)₂(η⁴‐C₄Ph₄) 1 . Compound 1 reacts with trimethylphosphine to produce Mo(PMe₃)(η²‐C₂Ph₂)₂(η⁴‐C₄Ph₄) 2 , or reacts with diphenylacetylene to produce (η⁵‐C₅Ph₅)₂Mo 3 and Mo(η²‐O₂CPh)(η⁴‐C₄Ph₄H)(η⁴‐C₄Ph₄) 4 . The molecular structures of 1, 2 and 4 have been determined by an X‐ray diffraction study.     

Synthese und Struktur von η1‐Phosphaallyl‐, η1‐Arsaallylund η1‐Stibaallyleisen‐Komplexen [(η5‐C5Me5)(CO)2Fe–E(SiMe3)C(OSiMe3)=CPh2] (E = P,As, Sb)

Syntheses and Structures of η¹‐Phosphaallyl, η¹‐Arsaallyl, and η¹‐Stibaallyl Iron Complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] (E = P, As, Sb) The reaction of equimolar amounts of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 a : E = P; 1 b : As; 1 c : Sb) and diphenylketene afforded the η¹‐phosphaallyl‐, η¹‐arsaallyl‐, and η¹‐stibaallyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] ( 2 a : E = P; 2 b : As; 2 c : Sb). The molecular structures of 2 b and 2 c were elucidated by single crystal X‐ray analyses.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η1und η3‐Allyl‐Rhenium‐Carbonylen

Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity of η¹‐ and η³‐Allyl Rhenium Carbonyls In (η³‐C₃H₅)Re(CO)₄ one CO ligand can be substituted by PPh₃, pyridine, isocyanide and benzonitrile. With 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethylene, 1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene and 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethane dinuclear ligand bridged complexes are obtained. The η³‐η¹ conversion of the allyl ligand occurs on reaction of (η³‐C₃H₅)Re(CO)₄ with the bidendate ligands 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane and 1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane and with 2,2′‐bipyridine (L–L) which gives the complexes (η¹‐C₃H₅)Re(CO)₃(L–L). By reaction of (η³‐C₃H₅)Re(CO)₄ with bis(diphenylphosphino)methane the allyl group is protonated and under elemination of propene the complex (OC)₃Re(Ph₂PCHPPh₂)(η¹‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) ( 19 ) with a diphosphinomethanide ligand is formed. On heating solutions of (η³‐C₃H₅)Re(CO)₄ and (η³‐C₃H₅)Re(CO)₃(CN‐2,5‐Me₂C₆H₃) ( 5 ) in methanol the methoxy bridged compounds Re₄(CO)₁₂(OH)(OMe)₃ and Re₂(CO)₄(CN‐2,5‐Me₂C₆H₃)₄(μ‐OMe)₂ ( 20 ) were isolated. The crystal structures of (η³‐C₃H₅)Re(CO)₃(CNCH₂SiMe₃) ( 4 ), [(η³‐C₃H₅)(OC)₃Re]₂‐ (μ‐bis‐(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) ( 8 ), (η¹‐C₃H₅)Re(CO)₃‐ (bpy) ( 14 ), of 19 , 20 and of (OC)₃Re‐[Ph₂P(CH₂)₃PPh₂]Cl ( 16 ) were determined by X‐ray diffraction.     

Synthesis,characterization, biological studies and in vitro cytotoxicity on human cancer cell lines of titanium(IV) and tin(IV) derivatives with the α,α′‐dimercapto‐o‐xylene ligand

The reaction of α,α′‐dimercapto‐o‐xylene (H₂dmox) with different precursors such as SnMe₂Cl₂, [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)₂Cl₂] and [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₄Me)₂Cl₂] (1:1) in the presence of two equivalents of NEt₃ yielded the complexes [SnMe₂(dmox)] (1), [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)₂(dmox)] (2) and [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₄Me)₂(dmox)] (3), respectively. 1–3 have been characterized by spectroscopic methods; in addition, complex 3 has been determined by X‐ray diffraction studies. Furthermore, structural studies based on density functional theory calculations of 1 and 2 have been carried out. The cytotoxic activity of 1–3 was tested against the tumour cell lines human adenocarcinoma HeLa, human myelogenous leukaemia K562 and human malignant melanoma Fem‐x. The results of this study show a higher cytotoxicity of the tin(IV) complex (1) in comparison to their titanium(IV) counterparts (2 and 3) as well as an improvement in the cytotoxic activity of compounds 2 and 3 compared to their titanocene(IV) dichloride analogues [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)₂Cl₂] and [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₄Me)₂Cl₂]. In view of the relatively high cytotoxicity of compound 1, a detailed study on the effects of the in vitro treatment of cancer cell lines using this compound was carried out. Thus cell cycle experiments on all the studied cell lines treated with 1 show that this complex seems to cause disturbances in the G1 phase of HeLa, and in the G1 and G2/M phases of Fem‐x cell line, while almost no disturbances were observed in the cycle of K562 cells treated with 1. Finally, DNA laddering method showed that treatment of the HeLa and Fem‐x cell lines with IC₉₀ doses of 1 resulted in the induction of apoptosis. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Über den Phosphandiyl‐Transfer von invers‐polarisierten Phosphaalkenen R1P=C(NMe2)2 (R1 = tBu,Cy, Ph,H) auf Phospheniumkomplexe [(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2M=P(R2)R3] (R2 = R3 = Ph; R2 = tBu,R3 = H; R2 = Ph,R3 = N(SiMe3)2)

Phosphanediyl Transfer from Inversely Polarized Phosphaalkenes R¹P=C(NMe₂)₂ (R¹ = tBu, Cy, Ph, H) onto Phosphenium Complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂M=P(R²)R³] (R² = R³ = Ph; R² = tBu, R³ = H; R² = Ph, R³ = N(SiMe₃)₂) Reaction of the freshly prepared phosphenium tungsten complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W=PPh₂] ( 3 ) with the inversely polarized phosphaalkenes RP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1 ) ( a : R = tBu; b : Cy; c : Ph) led to the η²‐diphosphanyl complexes ( 9a‐c ) which were isolated by column chromatography as yellow crystals in 24‐30 % yield. Similarly, phosphenium complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂M=P(H)tBu] (M = W ( 6 ); Mo ( 8 )) were converted into (M = W ( 11 ); Mo ( 12 )) by the formal abstraction of the phosphanediyl [PtBu] from 1a . Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W=P(Ph)N(SiMe₃)₂] ( 4 ) with HP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1d ) gave rise to the formation of yellow crystalline ( 10 ). The products were characterized by elemental analyses and spectra (IR, ¹H, ¹³C‐, ³¹P‐NMR, MS). The molecular structure of compound 10 was elucidated by an X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Zur Reaktivität der Ferriophosphaalkene [(η5‐C5Me5)(CO)2FeP=C(NR)R2] (NR = NMe2, NC5H10, R2 = Ph,tBu) gegenüber Protonsäuren,Alkylierungsmitteln und [{(Z)‐Cycloocten}Cr(CO)5]

Transition Metal‐substituted Phosphaalkenes. 42 Reactivity of the Ferriophosphaalkenes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP=C(NR )R²] (NR = NMe₂, NC₅H₁₀, R² = Ph, t Bu) towards Protic Acids, Alkylation Reagents, and [{( Z )‐Cyclooctene}Cr(CO)₅] The reaction of equimolar amounts of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP=C(NR )R²] ( 2 a : NR = NMe₂, R² = Ph; 2 b : NMe₂. tBu; 2 c : NC₅H₁₀, Ph) and etherial HBF₄ gave rise to the formation of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP(H)C(NR )R²] (BF₄) ( 3 a – c ) which were isolated as light red powders. Compounds 2 a – c were converted into [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP(Me)C(NR )R²] (SO₃CF₃) ( 4 a – c ) by treatment with methyl trifluoromethane sulfonate. In addition 2 a and Me₃SiCH₂OSO₂CF₃ afforded light red [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP(CH₂SiMe₃)C(NMe₂)Ph](SO₃CF₃) ( 5 ). The black complex [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP{Cr(CO)₅}C(NMe₂)Ph] ( 6 ) resulted from the combination of 2 a with [{(Z)‐cyclooctene}Cr(CO)₅]. The novel products were characterized by elemental analyses and spectra (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C‐ und ³¹P‐NMR).     

The Influence of the Ligands Cp*(η5‐C5Me5) and Cp(η5‐C5H5) on the Stability and Reactivity of Titanocene and Zirconocene Complexes: Reactions of the Bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene Permethylmetallocene Complexes (η5‐C5Me5)2M(η2‐Me3SiC2SiMe3), M = Ti,Zr, with H2O and CO2

The reactions of the bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene permethylmetallocene complexes CpM(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃) (M = Ti ( 1 ), M = Zr ( 2 )) with H₂O and CO₂ were studied and compared to those of the corresponding metallocene complexes Cp₂M(L)(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃) (M = Ti ( 3 ), L = – ; M = Zr, L = THF ( 4 )) to understand the influence of the ligands Cp(η⁵‐C₅H₅) and Cp*(η⁵‐C₅Me₅) as well as the metals titanium and zirconium on the reaction pathways and the obtained products. In the reaction of the permethyltitanocene complex 1 with water the dihydroxy complex CpTi(OH)₂ ( 5 ) was formed. This product differs from the well‐known titanoxane Cp₂TiOTiCp₂ which was obtained by the reaction of the corresponding titanocene complex 3 with water. The reaction of the permethylzirconocene complex 2 with water gives the mononuclear alkenyl zirconocene hydroxide 6 . An analogous product was assumed as the first step in the reaction of the corresponding zirconocene complex 4 with water which ends up in a dinuclear zirconoxane. In the conversion of the permethylzirconocene complex 2 with carbon dioxide the mononuclear insertion product 7 was formed by coupling of carbon dioxide and the acetylene. In contrast, the corresponding zirconocene complex 4 affords, by an analogous reaction, a dinuclear complex. In additional experiments the known complex CpZr(η²‐PhC₂SiMe₃) ( 8 ) was prepared, starting from CpZrCl₂ and Mg in the presence of PhC≡CSiMe₃. This complex reacts with carbon dioxide resulting in a mixture of the regioisomeric zirconafuranones 9 a and 9 b . From these in the complex 9 a , having the SiMe₃ group in β‐position to the metal, the Zr–C bond was quickly hydrolyzed by water to give the complex CpZr(OH)OC(=O)–C(SiMe₃)=CHPh ( 10 a ) compared to complex ( 9 b ) which gives slowly the complex CpZr(OH)OC(=O)–CPh=CH(SiMe₃) ( 10 b ).     

[Co(g5‐Me5C5)(g3‐tBu2PPCH–CH3)] aus [Co(g5‐Me5C5)(g2‐C2H4)2] und tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XVII [1] [Co(g⁵‐Me₅C₅)(g³‐^tBu₂PPCH–CH₃)] from [Co(g⁵‐Me₅C₅)(g²‐C₂H₄)₂] and ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅)(η³‐^tBu₂PPCH–CH₃)] 1 is formed in the reaction of [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅)(η²‐C₂H₄)₂] 2 with ^tBu₂P–P 4 (generated from ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 3 ) by elimination of one C₂H₄ ligand and coupling of the phosphinophosphinidene with the second one. The structure of 1 is proven by ³¹P, ¹³C, ¹H NMR spectra and the X‐ray structure analysis. Within the ligand ^tBu₂P¹P²C¹H–CH₃ in 1 , the angle P1–P2–C1 amounts to 90°. The Co, P1, P2, C1 atoms in 1 look like a „butterfly”︁. The reaction of 2 with a mixture of ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 3 and ^tBu–C?P 5 yields [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅){η⁴‐(^tBuCP)₂}] 6 and 1 . While 6 is spontaneously formed, 1 appears only after complete consumption of 5 .     

Isolation of New Disilanylene-bridged Bis（cyclopentadienyl）tetracarbonyldiiron Complexes and Molecular Structure of [η^5, η^5-C5H4SiMe（SiMePh2）C5H4]Fe2（CO）2（μ-CO）2

1,2-Diphenyl-1,2-dimethyldisilanylene-bridged bis-cyclopentadienyl complex[η~5,η~5-C_5H_4PhMeSiSiMePh-C_5H_4]Fe_2(CO)_2(μ-CO)_2(1)was synthesized by a modified procedure,from which the trans-isomer 1b that was pre-viously difficult to obtain has been isolated for the first time.More interestingly,two new regio-isomers[η~5,η~5C_5H_4SiMe(SiMePh_2)C_5H_4]Fe_2(CO)_2(μ-CO)_2(2)and [η~5,η~5-C_5H_4Me_2SiSiPh_2C_5H_4]Fe_2(CO)_2(μ-CO)_2(3)were occa-sionally obtained during above process,the novel structures of which opened up new options for further study ofthis type of Si—Si bond-containing transition metal complexes.The molecular structure of 2 has been determinedby the X-ray diffraction method.     

Synthesis,characterization and biological studies of alkenyl‐substituted titanocene(IV) carboxylate complexes

The carboxylate compounds [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(η⁵‐C₅H₄{CMe₂(CH₂CH₂CH?CH₂)})(O₂CCH₂SXyl)₂] (2; Xyl = 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃) and [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(η⁵‐C₅H₄{CMe₂(CH₂CH₂CH?CH₂)})(O₂CCH₂SMesl)₂] (3; Mes 1 = 2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂) were synthesized by the reaction of [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(η⁵‐C₅H₄{CMe₂(CH₂CH₂CH?CH₂)})Cl₂] (1) with 2 equivalents of xylylthioacetic acid or mesitylthioacetic acid, respectively. Compounds 2 and 3 were characterized by spectroscopic methods. The cytotoxic activity of 1–3 was tested against human tumor cell lines from four different histogenic origins—8505C (anaplastic thyroid cancer), DLD‐1 (colon cancer) and the cisplatin sensitive A253 (head and neck cancer) and A549 (lung carcinoma)—and compared with those of the reference complex [Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)₂Cl₂] (R1) and cisplatin. Surprisingly, the cytotoxic activities of the carboxylate derivatives were lower than those of their corresponding dichloride analogue (1). However, complexes 1–3 were more active than titanocene dichloride against all the studied cells with the exception of complex 2 against A253 and A549 cell lines. DNA‐interaction tests were also carried out. Solutions of all the studied complexes were treated with different concentrations of fish sperm DNA, observing modifications of the UV spectra with intrinsic binding constants of 2.99 × 10⁵, 2.45 × 10⁵, and 2.35 × 10⁵ M ^?1 for 1–3. Structural studies based on density functional theory calculations of 2 and 3 were also carried out. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Polymere Iodoplumbate – Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von (Pr3N–C2H4–NPr3)[Pb6I14(dmf)2] · 4 DMF, (Pr3N–C2H4–NPr3)[Pb(dmf)6][Pb5I14] · DMF und (Me3N–C2H4–NMe3)2[Pb2I7]I

Polymeric Iodoplumbates – Synthesis and Crystal Structures of (Pr₃N–C₂H₄–NPr₃)[Pb₆I₁₄(dmf)₂] · 4 DMF, (Pr₃N–C₂H₄–NPr₃)[Pb(dmf)₆][Pb₅I₁₄] · DMF, and (Me₃N–C₂H₄–NMe₃)₂[Pb₂I₇]I (Pr₃N–C₂H₄–NPr₃)[Pb₆I₁₄(dmf)₂] · 4 DMF ( 1 ) and (Pr₃N–C₂H₄–NPr₃)[Pb(dmf)₆][Pb₅I₁₄] · DMF ( 2 ) have almost the same composition, but completely different structures. Both compounds are formed selectively depending on the reaction and crystallization conditions. In 2 the Pb^II atoms are coordinated either by six bridging I^– ligands in the two-dimensional [Pb₅I₁₄]^4– network or by six DMF ligands in the [Pb(dmf)₆]²⁺ cations. In contrast, (Me₃N–C₂H₄–NMe₃)₂[Pb₂I₇]I ( 3 ) contains non-coordinating I^– anions between the iodoplumbate layers. The iodoplumbate anions in 2 and 3 consist of face and corner sharing PbI₆ octahedra, whereas in 1 PbI₆ and PbI₅(dmf) octahedra share common edges to form a one-dimensional polymeric section of the PbI₂ structure. (Pr₃N–C₂H₄–NPr₃)[Pb₆I₁₄(dmf)₂] · 4 DMF ( 1 ): Space group P1, a = 920.1(3), b = 1597.2(5), c = 1613.9(4) pm, α = 66.02(2), β = 84.53(2), γ = 85.99(2)°, V = 2156(1) · 10⁶ pm³; (Pr₃N–C₂H₄–NPr₃)[Pb(dmf)₆][Pb₅I₁₄]·DMF ( 2 ): Space group P2₁, a = 1201.21(9), b = 3031.1(2), c = 1294.96(9) pm, β = 108.935(7)°, V = 4459.8(5) · 10⁶ pm³; (Me₃N–C₂H₄–NMe₃)₂[Pb₂I₇]I ( 3 ): Space group Pnma, a = 2349.9(2), b = 1623.83(9), c = 980.75(7) pm, V = 3742.4(5) · 10⁶ pm³.