Interplay between the surface adsorption and solution-phase behavior in dialkyl chain cationic-nonionic surfactant mixtures

Neutron reflectivity, NR, and surface tension have been used to study the adsorption at the air-solution interface of mixtures of the dialkyl chain cationic surfactant dihexadecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide (DHDAB) and the nonionic surfactants monododecyl triethylene glycol (C12E3), monododecyl hexaethylene glycol (C12E6), and monododecyl dodecaethylene glycol (C12E12). The adsorption behavior of the surfactant mixtures with solution composition shows a marked departure from ideal mixing that is not consistent with current theories of nonideal mixing. For all three binary surfactant mixtures there is a critical composition below which the surface is totally dominated by the cationic surfactant. The onset of nonionic surfactant adsorption (expressed as a mole fraction of the nonionic surfactant) increases in composition as the ethylene oxide chain length of the nonionic cosurfactant increases from E3 to E12. Furthermore, the variation in the adsorption is strongly correlated with the variation in the phase behavior of the solution that is in equilibrium with the surface. The adsorbed amounts of DHDAB and the nonionic cosurfactants have been used to estimate the monomer concentration that is in equilibrium with the surface and are shown to be in reasonable qualitative agreement with the variation in the mixed critical aggregation concentration (cac).     

Self-assembly of hydrophobin and hydrophobin/surfactant mixtures in aqueous solution

The self-assembly of the protein hydrophobin, HFBII, and its self-assembly with cationic, anionic, and nonionic surfactants hexadecylterimethyl ammonium bromide, CTAB, sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS, and hexaethylene monododecyl ether, C(12)E(6), in aqueous solution have been studied by small-angle neutron scattering, SANS. HFBII self-assembles in solution as small globular aggregates, consistent with the formation of trimers or tetramers. Its self-assembly is not substantially affected by the pH or electrolytes. In the presence of CTAB, SDS, or C(12)E(6), HFBII/surfactant complexes are formed. The structure of the HFBII/surfactant complexes has been identified using contrast variation and is in the form of HFBII molecules bound to the outer surface of globular surfactant micelles. The binding of HFBII decreases the surfactant micelle aggregation number for increasing HFBII concentration in solution, and the number of hydrophobin molecules bound/micelle increases.     

Equilibrium surface adsorption behavior in complex anionic/nonionic surfactant mixtures

Neutron reflectivity (NR) and small angle neutron scattering (SANS) have been used to investigate the equilibrium surface adsorption behavior and the solution microstructure of mixtures of the anionic surfactant sodium 6-dodecyl benzene-4 sulfonate (SDBS) with the nonionic surfactants monododecyl octaethylene glycol (C12EO8) and monododecyl triiscosaethylene glycol (C12EO23). In the SDBS/C12EO8 and SDBS/C12EO23 solutions, small globular mixed micelles are formed. However, the addition of Ca2+ ions to SDBS/C12EO8 results in a transition to a vesicle phase or a mixed vesicle/micellar phase for SDBS rich compositions. In contrast, this transition hardly exists for the SDBS/C12EO23 mixture, and occurs only in a narrow composition region which is rich in SDBS. The adsorption of the SDBS/C12EO8 mixture at the air-solution interface is in the form of a mixed monolayer, with a composition variation that is not consistent with ideal mixing. In water and in the presence of NaCl, the nonideality can be broadly accounted for by regular solution theory (RST). At solution compositions rich in SDBS, the addition of Ca2+ ions results in the formation of multilayer structures at the interface. The composition range over which multilayer formation exists depends upon the Ca2+ concentration added. In comparison, the addition of a simple monovalent electrolyte, NaCl, at the same ionic strength does not have the same impact upon the adsorption, and the surface structure remains as a monolayer. Correspondingly, in solution, the mixed surfactant aggregates remain as relatively small globular micelles. In the presence of Ca2+ counterions, the variation in surface composition with solution composition is not well described by RST over the entire composition range. Furthermore, the mixing behavior is not strongly correlated with variations in the solution microstructure, as observed in other related systems.     

Structure of mixed anionic/nonionic surfactant micelles: experimental observations relating to the role of headgroup electrostatic and steric effects and the effects of added electrolyte

The structures of the mixed anionic/nonionic surfactant micelles of SDS/C12E6 and SDS/C12E8 have been measured by small angle neutron scattering (SANS). The variations in the micelle aggregation number and surface charge with composition, measured in D2O and in dilute electrolyte, 0.01 and 0.05 M NaCl, provide data on the relative roles of the surfactant headgroup steric and electrostatic interactions and their contributions to the free energy of micellization. For the SDS/C12E8 mixture, solutions increasingly rich in C12E8 show a modest micellar growth and an increase in the surface charge. The changes with increasing electrolyte concentration are similarly modest. In contrast, for the SDS/C12E6 mixture, solutions rich in C12E6 show a more significant increase in aggregation number. Furthermore, electrolyte has a more substantial effect on the aggregation for the nonionic (C12E6) rich mixtures. The experimental results are discussed in the context of estimates of the steric and electrostatic contributions to the free energy of micellization, calculated from the molecular thermodynamic approach. The variation in micelle surface charge is discussed in the context of the "dressed micelle" theory for micelle ionization, and other related data.     

Polyelectrolyte modified solid surfaces: the consequences for ionic and mixed ionic/nonionic surfactant adsorption

This paper describes how the cationic polyelectrolyte, polyDMDAAC (poly(dimethyl diallylammonium chloride)), is used to manipulate the adsorption of the anionic surfactant SDS and the mixed ionic/nonionic surfactant mixture of SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate)/C(12)E(6) (monododecyl hexaethylene glycol) onto the surface of hydrophilic silica. The deposition of a thin robust polymer layer from a dilute polymer/surfactant solution promotes SDS adsorption and substantially modifies the adsorption of SDS/C(12)E(6) mixtures in favor of a surface relatively rich in SDS compared to the solution composition. Different deposition conditions for the polyDMDAAC layer are discussed. In particular, at higher solution polymer concentrations and in the presence of 1 M NaCl, a thicker polymer layer is deposited and the reversibility of the surfactant adsorption is significantly altered.     

Analytical investigation of the self-desorption of the oligomers of mixtures of a polydisperse ethoxylated surfactant with sodium dodecylsulfate from a silica/water interface

The adsorption isotherms onto a hydrophilic silica of mixtures of sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) and of all the oligomers of a polydisperse nonylethylene glycol n-dodecyl ether (C(12)E(9)) surfactant were determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique. Incorporation of the anionic surfactant to the negatively charged silica surface is favored by the adsorption of the nonionic surfactant. Comparison between the adsorption isotherms of mixtures of SDS with a monodisperse C(12)E(9) and a polydisperse C(12)E(9) shows that the adsorption of SDS at the silica/water interface is stronger with the latter material than with the former in a large surface coverage domain. The composition of the surface aggregates and the variation of the oligomer distribution in these aggregates were determined. The previously described phenomena called self-desorption which was observed for the global C(12)E(9) and SDS surfactant mixtures was confirmed: increasing the total concentration at a fixed surfactant ratio induces at high concentration a desorption of the anionic surfactant and all of the less polar oligomers from the solid/water interface. An interpretation scheme is proposed which assumes that the interaction of SDS is larger with the less polar oligomers than with the polar ones. The self-desorption effect could then be considered as the consequence of the polydispersity of the nonionic surfactant and to the net repulsion interaction between SDS and the silica surface as the mole fraction of SDS in the surfactant mixture increases.     

Solution self-assembly of the sophorolipid biosurfactant and its mixture with anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate

The self-assembly in aqueous solution of the acidic (AS) and lactonic (LS) forms of the sophorolipid biosurfactant, their mixtures, and their mixtures with anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate, LAS, has been studied using predominantly small-angle neutron scattering, SANS, at relatively low surfactant concentrations of <30 mM. The more hydrophobic lactonic sophorolipid forms small unilamellar vesicles at low surfactant concentrations, in the concentration range of 0.2 to 3 mM, and transforms via a larger unilamellar vesicle structure at 7 mM to a disordered dilute phase of tubules at higher concentrations, 10 to 30 mM. In marked contrast, the acidic sophorolipid is predominantly in the form of small globular micelles in the concentration range of 0.5 to 30 mM, with a lower concentration of larger, more planar aggregates (lamellar or vesicular) in coexistence. In mixtures of AS and LS, over the same concentration range, the micellar structure associated with the AS sophorolipid dominates the mixed-phase behavior. In mixtures of anionic surfactant LAS with the AS sophorolipid, the globular micellar structure dominates over the entire composition and concentration range studied. In contrast, mixtures of LAS with the LS sophorolipid exhibit a rich evolution in phase behavior with solution composition and concentration. At low surfactant concentrations, the small unilamellar vesicle structure present for LS-rich solution compositions evolves into a globular micelle structure as the solution becomes richer in LAS. At higher surfactant concentrations, the disordered lamellar structure present for LS-rich compositions transforms to small vesicle/lamellar coexistence, to lamellar/micellar coexistence, to micellar/lamellar coexistence, and ultimately to a pure micellar phase as the solution becomes richer in LAS. The AS sophorolipid surfactant exhibits self-assembly properties similar to those of most other weakly ionic or nonionic surfactants that have relatively large headgroups. However, the more hydrophobic nature of the lactonic sophorolipid results in a more complex and unusual evolution in phase behavior with concentration and with concentration and composition when mixed with anionic surfactant LAS.     

Calorimetric study on the temperature dependence of the formation of mixed ionic/nonionic micelles

The differential excess enthalpy of mixed micelle formation was measured at different temperatures by mixing nonionic hexa(ethylene glycol) mono n-dodecyl ether with anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate or cationic dodecylpyridinium chloride. The experimental data were obtained calorimetrically by titrating a concentrated surfactant solution into a micellar solution of nonionic surfactant. The composition and the size of the mixed nonionic/ionic micelles at different surfactant concentrations were also determined. Pronounced differences in both composition and excess enthalpy were found between the anionic and the cationic mixed system. For both systems, the excess enthalpies become more exothermic with increasing temperature, but for the anionic mixed system an additional exothermic contribution was found which was much less temperature dependent. Temperature dependence of the excess enthalpy was attributed to the effect of the ionic headgroup on the hydration of the ethylene oxide (EO) groups in the mixed corona. Ionic headgroups located in the ethylene oxide layer cause the dehydration of the EO chains resulting in an additional hydrophobic contribution to the enthalpy of mixing. A high affinity of sodium dodecyl sulfate for nonionic micelles and an extra exothermic and less temperature dependent contribution to the excess enthalpy found for the SDS-C(12)E(6) system might be attributed to specific interactions (hydrogen bonds) between the sulfate headgroup and the partly dehydrated EO chain.     

Adsorption behavior of hydrophobin and hydrophobin/surfactant mixtures at the air-water interface

The adsorption of the surface-active protein hydrophobin, HFBII, and the competitive adsorption of HFBII with the cationic, anionic, and nonionic surfactants hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, CTAB, sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS, and hexaethylene monododecyl ether, C(12)E(6), has been studied using neutron reflectivity, NR. HFBII adsorbs strongly at the air-water interface to form a dense monolayer ～30 ? thick, with a mean area per molecule of ～400 ?(2) and a volume fraction of ～0.7, for concentrations greater than 0.01 g/L, and the adsorption is independent of the solution pH. In competition with the conventional surfactants CTAB, SDS, and C(12)E(6) at pH 7, the HFBII adsorption totally dominates the surface for surfactant concentrations less than the critical micellar concentration, cmc. Above the cmc of the conventional surfactants, HFBII is displaced by the surfactant (CTAB, SDS, or C(12)E(6)). For C(12)E(6) this displacement is only partial, and some HFBII remains at the surface for concentrations greater than the C(12)E(6) cmc. At low pH (pH 3) the patterns of adsorption for HFBII/SDS and HFBII/C(12)E(6) are different. At concentrations just below the surfactant cmc there is now mixed HFBII/surfactant adsorption for both SDS and C(12)E(6). For the HFBII/SDS mixture the structure of the adsorbed layer is more complex in the region immediately below the SDS cmc, resulting from the HFBII/SDS complex formation at the interface.     

Effect of surfactant type on surfactant-maltodextrin interactions: isothermal titration calorimetry, surface tensiometry, and ultrasonic velocimetry study

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), surface tensiometry, and ultrasonic velocimetry were used to characterize surfactant-maltodextrin interactions in buffer solutions (pH 7.0, 10 mM NaCl, 20 mM Trizma base, 30.0 degrees C). Experiments were carried out using three surfactants with similar nonpolar tail groups (C12) but different charged headgroups: anionic (sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS), cationic (dodecyl trimethylammonium bromide, DTAB), and nonionic (polyoxyethylene 23 lauryl ether, Brij35). All three surfactants bound to maltodextrin, with the binding characteristics depending on whether the surfactant headgroup was ionic or nonionic. The amounts of surfactant bound to 0.5% w/v maltodextrin (DE 5) at saturation were < 0.3 mM Brij35, approximately 1-1.6 mM SDS, and approximately 1.5 mM DTAB. ITC measurements indicated that surfactant binding to maltodextrin was exothermic. Surface tension measurements indicated that the DTAB-maltodextrin complex was more surface active than DTAB alone but that SDS- and Brij35- maltodextrin complexes were less surface active than the surfactants alone.     

Salt-induced phase inversion in aqueous cationic/anionic surfactant two-phase systems

Phase inversion of aqueous two-phase systems with excess cationic surfactant (abbreviated as ATPS-C) formed by aqueous mixtures of 1,3-propanediyl bis(dodecyl dimethylammonium bromide) (abbreviated as 12-3-12) and sodium dodecyl sulfonate (abbreviated as AS) at 318.15 K was investigated. The experimental results indicate that addition of NaF, NaCl, NaHCO 3, or NaNO 3 can result in phase inversion of ATPS-C formed by 12-3-12/AS systems; however, addition of NaBr cannot lead to phase inversion. TEM micrographic experiments illustrate that there is no direct relationship between the microstructures of the concentrated phase in ATPS-C and phase inversion. To interpret the phase-inversion phenomena of ATPS-C, the phase composition, phase density, and phase volume ratio between the dilute phase and the concentrated phase in ATPS-C were investigated. Phase composition analysis results illustrate that for the ATPS-C formed by 0.10 mol.kg (-1) 12-3-12/AS mixed system, the concentration of Br (-) counterions in the dilute phase of ATPS-C increases with addition of NaF, NaCl, NaHCO 3, or NaNO 3. At the same time, the molar ratio between the F (-) (Cl (-), HCO 3 (-), or NO 3 (-)) counterions and Br (-) counterions in the concentrated phase of ATPS-C increases also. It illustrates that part of the bromide counterions which are the natural counterions of the surfactant 12-3-12 in excess are exchanged by other anionic counterions when an additional salt is added to the system. The investigation indicates that the common ground of the added F (-), Cl (-), HCO 3 (-), or NO 3 (-) counterions is that they all make a smaller density contribution than that of Br (-) counterions, although they have a weaker or stronger counterion binding ability with the mixed positively charged aggregates in ATPS-C than that of Br (-) counterion. Density experiments illustrate that the density increase of the dilute phase is larger than that of the concentrated phase in the ATPS-C with addition of NaF, NaCl, NaHCO 3, or NaNO 3; thus, phase inversion occurs. The densities of the added inorganic sodium salt aqueous solution and the order of the Hofmeister series for the added inorganic anions with respect to the chaotropic headgroup of 12-3-12 play important roles in the phase inversion of ATPS-C.     

Simultaneous quantitative trace analysis of anionic and nonionic surfactant mixtures by reversed-phase liquid chromatography

The aim of this work was to simultaneously analyse mixtures of a polydisperse polyethylene oxide (PEO) nonionic surfactant and an anionic surfactant (sodium dodecylsulphate, SDS) in water containing sodium chloride in order to quantify trace amounts of these mixtures after their adsorption at water-solid interfaces. A fractional factorial design was then used to optimise the separation by ion-pair reversed-phase liquid chromatography as a function of six factors: the chain length of the tetraalkylammonium salt used as ion-pairing reagent which varied from methyl (C1) to n-propyl (C3); the concentration of this ion-pairing salt; the acetonitrile percentage in water used as organic modifier; the flow-rate; the temperature of analysis and also the sodium chloride concentration. The factorial design enabled in a limited number of analyses, not only to determine which factors had significant effects on retention times or on resolution between a pair of nonionic oligomers, but also to modelize and then find the interesting and rugged area where this resolution was optimal as well as the conditions where time of analysis was not prohibitive. After optimisation of HPLC analysis, we used a trace enrichment procedure to quantify very low concentrations of SDS and C12E9 polydisperse PEO in water. A C18 cartridge and a strong anionic exchange cartridge were coupled and the conditions of elution were optimised in order to obtain concentrated samples which were injected in the same eluent than the HPLC mobile phase. Under such conditions, we were able to quantify, in a single run, mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants at concentrations as low as 3.6 microg l(-1) for SDS and 2.5 microg l(-1) for each PEO oligomer in water.     

Spectrophotometric studies of anionic dye-cationic surfactant interactions in mixture of cationic and nonionic surfactants

The interaction between an anionic dye C.I. Reactive Orange 16 (RO16) and a cationic surfactant dodecylpyridinium chloride (DPC) in mixtures of DPC and nonionic surfactants poly(oxyethylene)ethers (C(m)POE(n); m = 12, 16 and 18, n = 4, 10 and 23) are investigated spectrophotometrically in a certain micellar concentration range. The spectrophotometric measurements of dye-surfactant systems are carried out as function of mole fraction of surfactant at four different temperatures. For this reason, a typical system was occurred at 1.0 x 10(-2) mol l(-1) for surfactants and at 1.0 x 10(-4) mol l(-1) for dye concentrations. The formation of DPC-RO16 complex in the C(m)POE(n) solutions of different mole fractions in its micellar concentration range have been determined and compared to those obtained in the binary mixtures. From the spectrophotometric measurements has been observed that the addition of nonionic surfactant in to the mixture of DPC-RO16, causes a significant increase of the value of absorbance. This increase explains that the stability of DPC-RO16 complex is reduced in the presence of nonionic surfactant micelles. It can be seen from results; in mixed surfactant solutions, there are DPC-C(m)POE(n) and RO16-C(m)POE(n) interactions in addition to DPC-RO16 interaction. Since the solubilizaton of the DPC-RO16 complex has been appeared in the C(m)POE(n) solution, our results support the conclusion that adding C(m)POE(n) influences the hydrophobic-hydrophilic balance of the studied complex. Furthermore effect of the alkyl chain length and the number of poly(oxyethylene) in nonionic surfactant on values of absorbance have been investigated.     

Synergism and foaming properties in mixed nonionic/fatty acid soap surfactant systems

The synergism and foaming behavior of a mixed surfactant system consisting of a nonionic surfactant (polyethoxylated alkyl ether C(n)E(m)) and a fatty acid soap (sodium oleate) were studied. The micellar interaction parameter (the beta-parameter) was determined from the cmc following the approach of Rubingh's regular solution theory. For both the C(12)E(6)/sodium oleate and the C(14)E(6)/sodium oleate mixtures, the results indicate a fairly strong attractive interaction (negative beta-values), which were in agreement with previous data reported for other nonionic/anionic surfactant systems. The characteristics of the foam produced from the surfactants were evaluated using a glass column equipped with a series of electrodes measuring the conductance of the foam, which enabled the water content of the foam to be determined. From these measurements, since the total foam volume was almost the same for all concentrations and surfactants, we compared the amount of liquid in the foam produced under dynamic foaming and the ability of the foam to entrain the liquid after the airflow was switched-off (static foam stability). The amount of liquid in the foam 100 s after the air was switched-off followed the order NaOl > C(12)E(6) > C(14)E(6). Also, the mixtures had the same foam volumes as the pure surfactants at the same concentration. However, both mixtures had higher concentrations of liquid in the foam when the mole fraction of the nonionic surfactant in the mixed surfactant system was greater than about >0.3 in the solution.     

Salt effect on the complex formation between cationic gemini surfactant and anionic polyelectrolyte in aqueous solution

Salt effect on the interaction of anionic polyelectrolyte sodium carboxymethylcellulose (NaCMC) with cationic gemini surfactant hexamethylene-1,6-bis(dodecyldimethylammonium bromide) [C12H25(CH3)2N(CH2)6N(CH3)2C12H25]Br2 (C12C6C12Br2) has been investigated using turbidimetric titration, steady-state fluorescence, and mobility measurement. It is found that the critical aggregation concentration(cac) for C12C6C12Br2/NaCMC complexes depends little on addition of sodium bromide (NaBr). However, in the presence of nonionic surfactant Triton X-100 (TX100), the critical ionic surfactant mole fraction for the onset of complex formation (Yc) increases markedly with increasing NaBr concentration. These salt effects are supposed as the overall result from competition between the increase of interaction and the screening of interaction. The increase of interaction is referred to as the effect that the larger micelle with higher surface charge density induced by salt has a stronger interaction with oppositely charged polyelectrolyte. The screening of interaction is referred to as the salt screening of electrostatic attraction between the polymer chain and the surfactant. For complex formation between C12C6C12Br2 and NaCMC, the increase of interaction probably compensates the screening of interaction, leading to constant cac values at different salt concentrations. For complex formation between the C12C6C12Br2/TX100 mixed micelle and NaCMC, the screening of interaction probably plays a dominant role, leading to higher suppression of electrostatic binding of micelles to polyelectrolyte.     

Micellization and interaction of anionic and nonionic mixed surfactant systems in water

Interaction between binary surfactant mixtures containing anionic surfactants viz. sodium dodecyl sulphates (NaDS) and magnesium dodecyl sulphates (Mg(DS)₂) and a nonionic surfactants viz. dodecyl dodecapolyethylene glycol ether (C₁₂E₁₂) and dodecyl pentadecapolyethylene glycol ether (C₁₂E₁₅) in water at different mole fractions (0–1) were studied by surface tension, viscometry and dynamic light scattering (DLS) methods. The composition of mixed micelles and the interaction parameter, β evaluated from the CMC data obtained by surface tension for different systems using Rubingh's theory were discussed. Activity coefficient (f₁ and f₂) of metal dodecyl sulphates (MDS)/C₁₂E_m (m = 12, 15) mixed surfactant systems were evaluated, which shows extent of ideality of individual surfactant in mixed system. The estimated interaction parameter indicates an overall attractive interaction in the mixed micelles, which is predominant for NaDS as compared to Mg(DS)₂. Counter ion valency has specific effect on the mixed micelles, as Mg(DS)₂ has less interaction with nonionic surfactants in comparison to NaDS due to strong condensation of counter ion. The stability factors for mixed micelles were also discussed by Maeda's approach, which was justified on the basis of steric factor due to difference in head group of nonionic surfactant. DLS measurements and viscosity data reveals the synergism in mixed micelles, showing typical viscosity trends and linearity in sizes were observed.     

Rheology of wormlike micelles in aqueous systems of a mixed amino acid-based anionic surfactant and cationic surfactant

Amino acid-based anionic surfactant, N-dodecanoylglutamic acid, after neutralizing by 2, 2′, 2″-nitrilotriethanol forms micellar solution at 25 °C. Addition of cationic cosurfactants hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC), hexadecylpyridinium chloride (CPC), and hexadecylpyridinium bromide (CPB) to the semi-dilute solution of anionic surfactant micellar solutions favor the micellar growth and after a certain concentration, entangled rigid network of wormlike micelles are formed. Viscosity increases enormously ～4th order of magnitude compared with water. With further addition of the cosurfactants, viscosity declines and phase separation to liquid crystal occurs. The wormlike micelles showed a viscoelastic behavior and described by Maxwell model with a single stress-relaxation mode. The position of viscosity maximum in the zero-shear viscosity curve shifts towards lower concentration upon changing cosurfactant from CPB to CTAC via CPC; however, the maximum viscosity is highest in the CPB system showing the formation of highly rigid network structure of wormlike micelles. In all the systems, viscosity decays exponentially with temperature following Arrhenius type behavior.     

Formation of fluorinated nonionic surfactant microemulsions in hydrofluorocarbon 134a (HFC 134a)

A structurally related series of fluorinated nonionic oxyethylene glycol surfactants of the type C(m)F(2m+1)(CH(2))(n)O[(CH(2)CH(2)O)(p)H], denoted C(m.n)E(p) (where m=4, 6, or 7, m=1 or 2, and p=4 or 6) were synthesized and their surface behavior in aqueous solution was characterized. The ability of these surfactants to form water-in-hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) propellant 134a microemulsions suitable for use in the aerosolized delivery of water-soluble drugs has been investigated. Phase studies showed that, regardless of the composition used, clear one-phase systems could not be prepared if a fluorinated nonionic surfactant was used alone, or in combination with a short or medium fluorocarbon alcohol cosurfactant. Clear one-phase systems could, however, be prepared if a short-chain hydrocarbon alcohol, such as ethanol, n-propanol, or n-pentanol, was used as cosurfactant, with the extent of the one-phase region increasing with decreased chain length of the alcohol cosurfactant. Light-scattering studies on a number of the hydrocarbon-alcoholcontaining systems in the propellant-rich part of the phase diagram showed that only systems prepared with C(4.2)E(6) and propanol contained microemulsion droplets (all other systems investigated were considered to be cosolvent systems).     

Interaction of water-soluble cationic porphyrin with anionic surfactant

The interaction of a cationic water-soluble porphyrin, 5,10,15,20-tetrakis [4-(3-pyridiniumpropoxy)phenyl]porphyrin tetrakisbromide (TPPOC3Py), with anionic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), in aqueous solution has been studied by means of UV-vis, (1)H NMR, fluorescence, circular dichroism (CD) spectra and dynamic laser light scattering (DLLS), and it reveals that TPPOC3Py forms porphyrin-surfactant complexes (aggregates), including ordered structures J- and H-aggregates, induced by association with surfactant monomers below the SDS critical micelle concentration (cmc), and forms micellized monomer upon the cmc, respectively. The position of TPPOC3Py in the micelle is determined, which is not in the micelle core instead of intercalated among the SDS chains, most likely with the pyridinium group extending into the polar headgroup region of the micelle.     

Self-assembly in complex mixed surfactant solutions: the impact of dodecyl triethylene glycol on dihexadecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide

The impact of the nonionic surfactant, dodecyl triethyleneglycol ether (C(12)E(3)) on the solution microstructure of the dialkyl chain cationic surfactant, dihexadecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide, (DHDAB) has been investigated. The variation in solution microstructure has been studied using a combination of small angle neutron scattering, ultra small angle neutron scattering, optical texture and photon correlation spectroscopy. At low surfactant concentrations (1.5 mM) the microstructure takes the form of bilamellar vesicles (BLV) for compositions containing less than 20 mol % of added C(12)E(3). Multilamellar vesicles (MLV) are the predominant microstructure for solutions richer in composition than 20 mol % C(12)E(3). At more than 80 mol % C(12)E(3), the solution microstructure reverts to that of a lamellar phase dispersion consistent with studies on the pure nonionic surfactant. At higher concentrations (60 mM) a wide continuous L beta phase region is observed for compositions in the range 20 to 80 mol % C(12)E(3). The fine details of the phase diagram were obtained from quantitative analysis of the SANS data using a well-established lamellar membrane model. Irrespective of the nonionic content, the bilayers are in general highly rigid, consistent with those stabilized by charge interactions. Furthermore estimates of the product of membrane moduli (compressibility and bending modulus) indicate that the different phase regions have very different membrane properties, however the magnitude of the variations observed are not predicted using existing theoretical treatments.