Ruthenium(II) complexes of hybrid 8‐hydroxyquinoline–thiosemicarbazone ligands: synthesis,characterization and catalytic applications

A series of new hexa‐coordinated ruthenium(II) hydroxyquinoline–thiosemicarbazone complexes of the type [Ru(CO)(EPh₃)(B)(L)] (E = P or As; B = PPh₃, AsPh₃ or Py; L = hydroxyquinoline–thiosemicarbazone) were synthesized by reacting ruthenium precursor complexes [RuHCl(CO)(EPh₃)₂(B)] (E = P or As; B = PPh₃, AsPh₃ or Py) with hydroxyquinoline–thiosemicarbazone ligands in ethanol. The new complexes were characterized by analytical and spectroscopic (FT‐IR, UV–visible, NMR (¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P) and fast atom bombardment (FAB)–mass spectrometric methods. Based on the spectral results, an octahedral geometry was assigned for all the complexes. The new complexes showed good catalytic activity for the conversion of aldehydes to amides in the presence of hydroxylamine hydrochloride–sodium bicarbonate and for the oxidation of alkanes into their corresponding alcohols and ketones in the presence of m‐chloroperbenzoic acid. The complexes also catalyzed the N‐alkylation of benzylamine in the presence of KOtBu in alcohol medium. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A Convenient Synthesis and Molecular Structure of Ru(CO)3[Ph2PN(i‐Bu)PPh2‐P,P]

Ru(CO)₃ [Ph₂PN (i‐Bu) PPh₂‐P, P] was conveniently obtained by the reaction of Ru(DMSO)₄Cl₂ with Ph₂PN(i‐Bu)‐PPb₂ and CO in the presence of Zn powder under mild conditions. The crystal and molecular structure was determined by X‐ray diffraction. This compound possesses a distorted trigonal bipyramidal configuration.     

Thermal isomerization of ruthenium hydride compounds containing asymmetric bidentate pyrrole‐imine ligands

A series of ruthenium hydride compounds containing substituted bidentate pyrrole‐imine ligands were synthesized and characterized. Reacting RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃ with one equivalent of [C₄H₃NH(2‐CH=NR)] in ethanol in the presence of KOH gave compounds {RuH(CO)(PPh₃)₂[C₄H₃N(2‐CH=NR)]} where trans‐Py‐Ru‐H 1, R = CH₂CH₂C₆H₉; cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 2, R = Ph‐2‐Me; and cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 3, R = C₆H₁₁. Heating trans‐Py‐Ru‐H 1 in toluene at 70°C for 12 hr resulted a thermal conversion of the trans‐Py‐Ru‐H 1 into its cis form, {RuH(CO)(PPh₃)₂[C₄H₃N(2‐CH=NCH₂CH₂C₆H₉)]} (cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 1) in very high yield. The ¹H NMR spectra of trans‐Py‐Ru‐H 1, cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 2, cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 3, and cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 1 all show a typical triplet at ca. δ–11 for the hydride. The trans and cis form indicate the relative positions of pyrrole ring and hydride. The geometries of trans‐Py‐Ru‐H 1, cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 1, and cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 3 are relatively similar showing typical octahedral geometries with two PPh₃ fragments arranged in trans positions.     

Spectroscopic characterization and electrochemical studies of ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes containing bidentate Schiff bases and triphenylphosphine or a nitrogen heterocycle

Reactions of ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes of the type [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂(B)] [B?=?PPh₃, pyridine (py), piperidine (pip) or morpholine (mor)] with bidentate Schiff base ligands derived from the condensation of 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde with aniline, o-, m- or p-toluidine in a 1?:?1 mol ratio in benzene resulted in the formation of complexes formulated as [RuCl(CO)(L)(PPh₃)(B)] [L?=?bidentate Schiff base anion, B?=?PPh₃, py, pip, mor]. The complexes were characterized by analyses, IR, electronic and ¹H NMR spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammetric studies. In all cases, the Schiff bases replace one molecule of phosphine and a hydride ion from the starting complexes, indicating that Ru–N bonds in the complexes containing heterocyclic nitrogenous bases are stronger than the Ru–P bond to PPh₃. Octahedral geometry is proposed for the complexes.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and X‐ray Structures of Ru3(CO)9(dotpm)(L) Complexes [L = PPh3, P(C6H4Cl‐p)3, and PPh2(C6H4Br‐p)]

The reaction of Ru₃(CO)₁₀(dotpm) ( 1 ) [dotpm = (bis(di‐ortho‐tolylphosphanyl)methane)] and one equivalent of L [L = PPh₃, P(C₆H₄Cl‐p)₃ and PPh₂(C₆H₄Br‐p)] in refluxing n‐hexane afforded a series of derivatives [Ru₃(CO)₉(dotpm)L] ( 2 – 4 ), respectively, in ca. 67–70 % yield. Complexes 2 – 4 were characterized by elemental analysis (CHN), IR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C{¹H} NMR and ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy. The molecular structures of 2 , 3 , and 4 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The bidentate dotpm and monodentate phosphine ligands occupy equatorial positions with respect to the Ru triangle. The effect of substitution resulted in significant differences in the Ru–Ru and Ru–P bond lengths.     

Reactions of 2-(arylazo)aniline with ruthenium substrates: Isolation, characterizations and reactivities of delocalized diazoketiminato and orthometallated Ru(II) chelates

Reactions of 2-(arylazo)aniline, HL-NH₂ [H represents the dissociable protons upon complexation and HL-NH₂ is p-RC₆H₄NNC₆H₄-NH₂; R = H for HL¹-NH₂; CH₃ for HL²-NH₂ and Cl for HL³-NH₂] with Ru(H)(CO)(PPh₃)₃Cl and Ru(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂ afforded products of compositions [(HL-NH)Ru(CO)Cl(PPh₃)₂] and [(L-NH)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CO)], respectively. All the complexes were characterized unequivocally. The X-ray structures of the complexes 4c and 5c have been determined. The cyclic volatammograms exhibited one reversible oxidative response in the range of 0.56–0.16 V versus SCE for [(L-NH)Ru(PPh₃)₂(CO)] and a quasi reversible oxidative response within 0.56–0.70 V versus SCE for [(HL-NH)Ru(CO)Cl(PPh₃)₂]. The conversion of ketones to corresponding alcohols has been studied in presence of newly synthesized ruthenium complexes.     

Iron(0), rhodium(I) and palladium(II) complexes with p‐(N,N‐dimethylaminophenyl) diphenylphosphine and the application of the palladium complex as a catalyst for the Suzuki–Miyaura cross‐coupling reaction

The reaction of p‐(N,N‐dimethylaminophenyl)diphenylphosphine [PPh₂(p‐C₆H₄NMe₂)] with [Fe₃(CO)₁₂], [Rh(CO)₂Cl]₂ and PdCl₂ resulted in three new mononuclear complexes, {Fe(CO)₄[η¹‐(P)‐PPh₂(p‐C₆H₄NMe₂)]} ( 1a ), trans‐{Rh(CO)Cl[η¹‐(P)‐PPh₂(p‐C₆H₄NMe₂)]₂} ( 2 ) and trans‐{PdCl₂[η¹‐(P)‐PPh₂(p‐C₆H₄NMe₂)]₂} ( 3 ), respectively. A small amount of dinuclear nonmetal‐metal bonded complex, {Fe₂(CO)₈[µ‐(P,N)‐PPh₂(p‐C₆H₄NMe₂)]} ( 1b ), was also isolated as a side product in the reaction of [Fe₃(CO)₁₂]. The complexes were characterized by elemental analyses, mass, IR, UV–vis, ¹H, ¹³C (except 1b) and ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy. The Pd complex 3 effectively catalyzes the Suzuki–Miyaura cross‐coupling reactions of aryl halides with arylboronic acids in water–isopropanol (1:1) at room temperature. Excellent yields (up to 99% isolated yield) were achieved. The effects of different solvents, bases, catalyst quantities were also evaluated. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Formation of an Acyl‐Ethynyl‐Methylidyne Complex of Cobalt: Structure of Co3{μ3‐CC(O)C≡C[Ru(dppe)Cp*]}(CO)8(PPh3)

The reaction between Ru(C≡CH)(dppe)Cp* and Co₃(μ₃‐CBr)(CO)₉ in the presence of Pd(PPh₃)₄/CuI afforded dark red Co₃{μ₃‐CC(O)C≡C[Ru(dppe)Cp*]}(CO)₈(PPh₃), whose formation may involve attack of the Ru‐ethynyl fragment on an intermediate cluster‐bound CCO ligand; abstraction of PPh₃ from the palladium catalyst also occurs.     

Organometallic Lewis Acids,Part LXII. Chiral Carbonyl‐Cyclopentadienyl‐Triphenylphosphine‐Iron and ‐Ruthenium Complexes with Tertiary Nitriles [CpM(CO)(PPh3)(N≡C–CR1R2R3)]+ BF4– (M = Fe,Ru)

A series of tertiary nitriles was synthesized by alkylation of acetonitrile, primary and secondary nitriles, using alkylbromides and sodium amide in liquid ammonia. By reaction of the in situ formed organometallic Lewis acids [CpM(CO)(PPh₃)]⁺ (M = Fe, Ru) with the novel tertiary nitriles, the complexes [CpM(CO)(PPh₃)(N≡C–CR¹R²R³]BF₄ were obtained. A di‐iron complex was formed with 1,6‐dicyanohexane.     

Synthesis,Spectroscopy, and Structures of Mono‐ and Dinuclear Copper(I) Halide Complexes with 1,3‐Imidazolidine‐2‐thiones

Copper(I) halides with triphenyl phosphine and imidaozlidine‐2‐thiones (L ‐NMe, L ‐NEt, and L ‐NPh) in acetonitrile/methanol (or dichloromethane) yielded copper(I) mixed‐ligand complexes: mononuclear, namely, [CuCl(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NMe)(PPh₃)₂] ( 1 ), [CuBr(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NMe)(PPh₃)₂] ( 2 ), [CuBr(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NEt)(PPh₃)₂] ( 5 ), [CuI(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NEt)(PPh₃)₂] ( 6 ), [CuCl(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NPh)(PPh₃)₂] ( 7 ), and [CuBr(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NPh)(PPh₃)₂] ( 8 ), and dinuclear, [Cu₂(κ¹‐I)₂(μ‐S‐L ‐NMe)₂(PPh₃)₂] ( 3 ) and [Cu₂(μ‐Cl)₂(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NEt)₂(PPh₃)₂] ( 4 ). All complexes were characterized with analytical data, IR and NMR spectroscopy, and X‐ray crystallography. Complexes 2 – 4 , 7 , and 8 each formed crystals in the triclinic system with P$\bar{1}$ space group, whereas complexes 1 , 5 , and 6 crystallized in the monoclinic crystal system with space groups P2₁/c, C2/c, and P2₁/n, respectively. Complex 2 has shown two independent molecules, [(CuBr(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NMe)(PPh₃)₂] and [CuBr(PPh₃)₂] in the unit cell. For X = Cl, the thio‐ligand bonded to metal as terminal in complex 4 , whereas for X = I it is sulfur‐bridged in complex 3 .     

Reactions of molybdenum and ruthenium carbonyls with some pyridylamine ligands

The interaction of Mo(CO)₆ and Ru₃(CO)₁₂ with 2-aminoethylpyridine (aepy), 2-hydrazinopyridine (hzpy) and dipicolylamine (dpa) have been investigated. Molybdenum complexes were found to have either mono- or binuclear derivatives, [MoO₂(CO)₂(aepy)] (1), [MoO₂(CO)₂(hzpy)] (2), [Mo₂O₆(aepy)₂] (3), [Mo₂O₆(hzpy)₂] (4), and [Mo₂O₄(dpa)₂] (5), depending on the reactions conditions. Ruthenium complexes are shown to have a molecular formulae of a mononuclear species; [Ru(CO)₃(aepy)] (6), [Ru(CO)₃(hzpy)] (7) and [Ru(CO)₂(dpa)] (8). The proposed structures of the complexes were elucidated using elemental analyses, i.r., u.v.–vis. and n.m.r. spectroscopy. The thermal stabilities of the reported complexes were also investigated using the t.g. technique.     

Diphenylbenchrotrenylphosphine - a new two-electron ligand in carbonyl-containing π-aromatic chromium and manganese complexes and in carbonyls of group vib metals

Photochemical substitution of CO ligands in C₆H₆Cr(CO)₃, C₅H₅Mn(CO)₃ and M(CO)₆ (M = Cr, Mo, W) for PPh₂C₆H₅Cr(CO)₃, ligands was used to synthesize novel complexes: C₆H₆Cr(CO)₂PPh₂C₆H₅Cr(CO)₃, C₅H₅Mn(CO)₂PPh₂C₆H₅Cr (CO)₃ and M(CO)₅PPh₂C₆H₅Cr(CO)₃.The complexes obtained have been characterized by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR, and mass spectra.The protonation reaction and the hydrogen isotopic exchange of arenechromium carbonyl complexes in acid media have been studied.The ¹³C NMR spectra of M(CO)₅PPh₂C₆H₅Cr(CO)₃ show that the nature of the central metal atom influences the chemical shifts of the carbon nuclei of the carbonyl groups, shielding these atoms, increasing in the series W ⩽ Mo < Cr.     

Chemistry of a family of semiquinone monochelates of carbonyl ruthenium(II) generated by reacting quinones with hydridic species

The reactions of [Ru(H)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with 3,5-di-tert-butyl-o-benzoquinone (dbq) and 3,4,5,6-tetrachloro-o-benzoquinone (tcq) have afforded the corresponding semiquinone complexes [Ru^II(dbsq)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] and [Ru^II(tcsq)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂], respectively. The reaction of [Ru(H)₂(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with tcq has furnished [Ru^II(tcsq)(H)(CO)(PPh₃)₂]. Structure determination of [Ru(dbsq)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] has revealed that it is a model semiquinonoid chelate with two equal C---O lengths ( 1.291(6) and 1.296(6) Å). The complexes are one-electron paramagnetic (1.85μ_B) and their EPR spectra in fluid media display a triplet structure (g2.00) due to superhyperfine coupling with two trans-³¹P atoms (A_iso17 G). The stretching frequency of the CO ligand increases by 20 cm⁻¹ in going from [Ru(dbsq)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] to [Ru(tcsq)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] consistent with electron withdrawal by chloro substituents. For the same reason the E_1/2 values of the cyclic voltammetric quinone/semiquinone and semiquinone/catechol couples undergo a shift of 500 mV to higher potentials between [Ru(dbsq)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] and [Ru(tcsq)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂].     

Derivate des borols: IX. (η5-borol)metall-komplexe von ruthenium,osmium und rhodium

Dehydrogenating complexation of borolenes with carbonyls (Ru₃(CO)₁₂, Os₃(CO)₁₂), Wilkinson's catalyst (RhCl(PPh₃)₃) and related compounds (RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃, RuHCl(PPh₃)₃, OSCl₂(PPh₃)₃), and (η⁶-arene)ruthenium complexes (Ru(η-C₆H₆)(η⁴-C₆H₈), [Ru(η-C₆H₆)Cl₂]₂, [Ru(η-C₆-Me₆)Cl₂]₂) leads to the (η⁵-borole)metal complexes of Ru, Os, and Rh. Inter alia, the preparation of the complexes Ru(CO)₃(η⁵-C₄H₄BF) (R = Ph, OMe, Me), Os(CO)₃L (L = η⁵-C₄H₄BPh), MHClL(PPh₃)₂ (M = Ru, Os), RhClL(PPh₃)₂, and RuL(η-C₆R₆) (R = H, Me) is described. The structures of RuHClL(PPh₃)₂ and RhClL(PPh₃)₂ have been determined by X-ray diffraction analysis.     

Acetylene Dithiolate Linking up the [Tp′W(CO)(CN)] Moiety with RuII or PdII

A series of heterodinuclear complexes with acetylene dithiolate (acdt^2?) as the bridging moiety were synthesised by a facile one‐pot procedure that avoided use of the highly elusive acetylene dithiol. Generation of the W–Ru complex [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] (Tp’=hydrotris(3,5‐dimethylpyrazolyl)borate) and the W–Pd complexes [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)] and [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)][PF₆] (dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphoshino)ethane), which exhibit a [W(η²‐κ²‐C₂S₂)M] core (M=Ru, Pd), was accomplished by using a transition‐metal‐assisted solvolytical removal of the Me₃Si‐ethyl thiol protecting groups. All intermediate species of the reaction have been fully characterised. The highly coloured W–Ru complex [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] shows reversible redox chemistry, as does the prototype complex [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)][PF₆]. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction and IR, EPR and UV/Vis spectroscopic studies in conjunction with DFT calculations prove the high electronic delocalisation of states over the acdt^2? linker. Comparative studies revealed a higher donor strength and more pronounced dithiolate character of acdt^2? in [Tp′W(CN)(CO)(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)] relative to [Tp′W(CO)₂(C₂S₂)Ru(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(PPh₃)]⁺. In addition, the influence of the overall complex charge on the metric parameters was investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies with the W–Pd complexes [Tp′WL₂(C₂S₂)Pd(dppe)] (L=(CN^?)(CO) or (CO)₂). The central [W(C₂S₂)Pd] units exhibit high structural similarity, which indicates the extensive delocalisation of charge over both metals.     

Molybdenum(0) and Tungsten(0) Complexes with P,S and P,Se Monooxidized Bis(phosphanyl)amine Ligands

Reactions of monooxidized thioyl and selenoyl bis(phosphanyl)amine ligands C₁₀H₇‐1‐N(P(E)Ph₂)(PPh₂) [E = S ( 1 ), Se ( 2 )] with Mo(CO)₄(pip)₂ and W(CO)₄(cod) afforded the complexes [M(CO)₄{ 1 ‐κ²P,S}] [M = Mo ( 3 ), W ( 4 )] and [M(CO)₄{ 2 ‐κ²P,Se}] [M = Mo ( 5 ), W ( 6 )]. Complexes 3 – 6 were characterized by multinuclear NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, and ⁷⁷Se NMR) and IR spectroscopy. Crystal‐structure determinations were carried out on 3 , 5 , and 6 , which represent the first examples of structurally characterized complexes of such ligands with group‐6 metal carbonyls.     

Ruthenium NNN complexes with a 2‐hydroxypyridylmethylene fragment for transfer hydrogenation of ketones

Four NNN tridentate ligands L₁–L₄ containing 2‐methoxypyridylmethene or 2‐hydroxypyridylmethene fragment were synthesized and introduced to ruthenium centers. When (HOC₅H₃NCH₂C₅H₃NC₅H₇N₂) (L₂) and (HOC₅H₃NCH₂C₅H₃NC₆H₆N₃) (L₄) reacted with RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃, two ruthenium chloride products Ru(L₂)(PPh₃)Cl₂ ( 1 ) and Ru(L₄)(PPh₃)Cl₂ ( 2 ) were isolated, respectively. Reactions of (MeOC₅H₃NCH₂C₅H₃NC₅H₇N₂) (L₁) and (MeOC₅H₃NCH₂C₅H₃NC₆H₆N₃) (L₃) with RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃ in the presence of NH₄PF₆ generated two dicationic complexes [Ru(L₁)₂][PF₆]₂ ( 3 ) and [Ru(L₃)₂][PF₆]₂ ( 4 ), respectively. Complex 1 reacted with CO to afford product [Ru(L₂)(PPh₃)(CO)Cl][Cl]. The catalytic activity for transfer hydrogenation of ketones was investigated. Complex 1 showed the highest activity, with a turnover frequency value of 1.44 × 10³ h^?1 for acetophenone, while complexes 3 and 4 were not active.     

Metal Derivatives of Heterocyclic‐2‐thiones: Crystal Structures of [Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)propane][bis(pyrimidine‐2‐thiolato)]ruthenium(II) and [Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methane][bis(pyridine‐2‐thiolato)]ruthenium(II)

Ruthenium(II) Complexes containing pyrimidine‐2‐thiolate (pymS^–) and bis(diphenylphosphanyl)alkanes [Ph₂P–(CH₂)_m–PPh₂, m = 1, dppm; m = 2, dppe; m = 3, dppp; m = 4, dppb] are described. Reactions of [RuCl₂L₂] (L = dppm, dppp) and [Ru₂Cl₄L₃] (L = dppb) with pyrimidine‐2‐thione (pymSH) in 1:2 molar ratio in dry benzene in the presence of Et₃N base yielded the [Ru(pymS)₂L] complexes (pymS^– = pyrimidine‐2‐thiolate; L = dppm ( 1 ); dppp ( 3 ); dppb ( 4 )). The complex [Ru(pymS)₂(dppe)] ( 2 ) was indirectly prepared by the reaction of [Ru(pymS)₂(PPh₃)₂] with dppe. These complexes were characterized using analytical data, IR, ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR spectroscopy, and X‐ray crystallography (complex 3 ). The crystal structure of the analogous complex [Ru(pyS)₂(dppm)] ( 5 ) with the ligand pyridine‐2‐thiolate (pyS^–) was also described. X‐ray crystallographic investigation of complex 3 has shown two four‐membered chelate rings (N, S donors) and one six‐membered ring (P, P donors) around the metal atom. Compound 5 provides the first example in which Ru^II has three four‐membered chelate rings: two made up by N, S donor ligands and one made up by P, P donor ligand. The arrangement around the metal atoms in each complex is distorted octahedral with cis:cis:trans:P, P:N, N:S, S dispositions of the donor atoms. The ³¹P NMR spectroscopic data revealed that the complexes are static in solution, except 2 , which showed the presence of more than one species.     

Tailoring RuII Pyridine/Triazole Oxygenation Catalysts and Using Photoreactivity to Probe their Electronic Properties

Tuning of ligand properties is at the heart of influencing chemical reactivity and generating tailor‐made catalysts. Herein, three series of complexes [Ru(L)(Cl)(X)]PF₆ (X=DMSO, PPh₃, or CD₃CN) with tripodal ligands (L1–L5) containing pyridine and triazole arms are presented. Triazole‐for‐pyridine substitution and the substituent at the triazole systematically influence the redox behavior and photoreactivity of the complexes. The mechanism of the light‐driven ligand exchange of the DMSO complexes in CD₃CN could be elucidated, and two seven‐coordinate intermediates were identified. Finally, tuning of the ligand framework was applied to the catalytic oxygenation of alkanes, for which the DMSO complexes were the best catalysts and the yield improved with increasing number of triazole arms. These results thus show how click‐derived ligands can be tuned on demand for catalytic processes.     

On the reactivity of platina‐β‐diketones: a straightforward synthesis of trans‐acetylchlorobis(phosphine)platinum(II) complexes and their reactivity

The platina‐β‐diketone [Pt₂{(COMe)₂H}₂(µ‐Cl)₂] ( 1 ) was found to react with monodentate phosphines to yield acetyl(chloro)platinum(II) complexes trans‐[Pt(COMe)Cl(PR₃)₂] (PR₃ = PPh₃, 2a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 2b ; PMePh₂, 2c ; PMe₂Ph, 2d ; P(n‐Bu)₃, 2e ; P(o‐tol)₃, 2f ; P(m‐tol)₃, 2g ; P(p‐tol)₃, 2h ). In the reaction with P(o‐tol)₃ the methyl(carbonyl)platinum(II) complex [Pt(Me)Cl(CO){P(o‐tol)₃}] ( 3a ) was found to be an intermediate. On the other hand, treating 1 with P(C₆F₅)₃ led to the formation of [Pt(Me)Cl(CO){P(C₆F₅)₃}] ( 3b ), even in excess of the phosphine. Phosphine ligands with a lower donor capability in complexes 2 and the arsine ligand in trans‐[Pt(COMe)Cl(AsPh₃)₂] ( 2i ) proved to be subject to substitution by stronger donating phosphine ligands, thus forming complexes trans‐[Pt(COMe)Cl(L)L′] (L/L′ = AsPh₃/PPh₃, 4a ; PPh₃/P(n‐Bu)₃, 4b ) and cis‐[Pt(COMe)Cl(dppe)] ( 4c ). Furthermore, in boiling benzene, complexes 2a – 2c and 2i underwent decarbonylation yielding quantitatively methyl(chloro)platinum(II) complexes trans‐[Pt(Me)Cl(L)₂] (L = PPh₃, 5a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 5b ; PMePh₂, 5c ; AsPh₃, 5d ). The identities of all complexes were confirmed by ¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses of 2a ·2CHCl₃, 2f and 5b showed that the platinum atom is square‐planar coordinated by two phosphine ligands (PPh₃, 2a ; P(o‐tol)₃, 2f ; P(4F‐C₆H₄)₃, 5b ) in mutual trans position as well as by an acetyl ligand ( 2a, 2f ) and a methyl ligand ( 5b ), respectively, trans to a chloro ligand. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis of 3b exhibited a square‐planar platinum complex with the two π‐acceptor ligands CO and P(C₆F₅)₃ in mutual cis position (configuration index: SP‐4‐3). Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.