Alfa-cut based linear programming methodology for constrained matrix games with payoffs of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers

The purpose of this paper is to develop an effective methodology for solving constrained matrix games with payoffs of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (TrFNs), which are a type of two-person non-cooperative games with payoffs expressed by TrFNs and players’ strategies being constrained. In this methodology, it is proven that any Alfa-constrained matrix game has an interval-type value and hereby any constrained matrix game with payoffs of TrFNs has a TrFN-type value. The auxiliary linear programming models are derived to compute the interval-type value of any Alfa-constrained matrix game and players’ optimal strategies. Thereby the TrFN-type value of any constrained matrix game with payoffs of TrFNs can be directly obtained through solving the derived four linear programming models with data taken from only 1-cut and 0-cut of TrFN-type payoffs. Validity and applicability of the models and method proposed in this paper are demonstrated with a numerical example of the market share game problem.     

Common resources, optimality and taxes in dynamic games with increasing number of players

In the paper we examine the problem of exploitation of a common renewable resource. We use two kinds of models of this problem: games with finitely many players and games with a continuum of players. Equilibria in both cases are calculated and the payoffs are compared with payoffs in the situation in which each player behaves as a single owner of the resource. Various concepts of optimality are considered: optimality in the sense of property, Pareto optimality, maximization of a social welfare function of specific type and environmental sustainability. Another issue is the problem of enforcement of assumed profiles by so-called “linear” tax systems. Special attention is paid to the comparison of games with finitely many players and their continuum-of-players limit game.     

Weighted nucleoli

Cooperative games in characteristic function form (TU games) are considered. We allow for variable populations or carriers. Weighted nucleoli are defined via weighted excesses for coalitions. A solution satisfies the Null Player Out (NPO) property, if elimination of a null player does not affect the payoffs of the other players. For any single-valued and efficient solution, the NPO property implies the null player property. We show that a weighted nucleolus has the null player property if and only if the weights of multi-player coalitions are weakly decreasing with respect to coalition inclusion. Weighted nucleoli possessing the NPO-property can be characterized by means of a multiplicative formula for the weights of the multi-player coalitions and a restrictive condition on the weights of one-player coalitions. Received: March 1997/Final version: November 1998     

The Compromise Value for Cooperative Games with Random Payoffs

This paper introduces and studies the compromise value for cooperative games with random payoffs, that is, for cooperative games where the payoff to a coalition of players is a random variable. This value is a compromise between utopia payoffs and minimal rights and its definition is based on the compromise value for NTU games and the τ-value for TU games. It is shown that the nonempty core of a cooperative game with random payoffs is bounded by the utopia payoffs and the minimal rights. Consequently, for such games the compromise value exists. Further, we show that the compromise value of a cooperative game with random payoffs coincides with the τ-value of a related TU game if the players have a certain type of preferences. Finally, the compromise value and the marginal value, which is defined as the average of the marginal vectors, coincide on the class of two-person games. This results in a characterization of the compromise value for two-person games.I thank Peter Borm, Ruud Hendrickx and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments.     

Stability of the core mapping in games with a countable set of players

Greenberg (1990) and Ray (1989) showed that in coalitional games with a finite set of players the core consists of those and only those payoffs that cannot be dominated using payoffs in the core of a subgame. We extend the definition of the dominance relation to coalitional games with an infinite set of players and show that this result may not hold in games with a countable set of players (even in convex games). But if a coalitional game with a countable set of players satisfies a mild continuity property, its core consists of those and only those payoff vectors which cannot be dominated using payoffs in the core of a subgame.     

全对策的边际贡献值

全对策是定义在局中人集合的所有分划集上的一类特殊合作对策.本文在效用可转移情形下研究全对策的"值"问题.定义了全对策的边际贡献值,得出全对策的Shapley值,以及具有某些性质的值是边际贡献值,并给出两种边际贡献值的具体表达式,及其一些性质.     

Pursuit–Evasion Games with incomplete information in discrete time

Pursuit–Evasion Games (in discrete time) are stochastic games with nonnegative daily payoffs, with the final payoff being the cumulative sum of payoffs during the game. We show that such games admit a value even in the presence of incomplete information and that this value is uniform, i.e. there are e{\epsilon}-optimal strategies for both players that are e{\epsilon}-optimal in any long enough prefix of the game. We give an example to demonstrate that nonnegativity is essential and expand the results to Leavable Games.     

Game theoretic approach for fertilizer application: looking for the propensity to cooperate

This paper continues the research implemented in previous work of (Schreider et al. in Environ. Model. Assess. 15(4):223–238, 2010) where a game theoretic model for optimal fertilizer application in the Hopkins River catchment was formulated, implemented and solved for its optimal strategies. In that work, the authors considered farmers from this catchment as individual players whose objective is to maximize their objective functions which are constituted from two components: economic gain associated with the application of fertilizers which contain phosphorus to the soil and environmental harms associated with this application. The environmental losses are associated with the blue-green algae blooming of the coastal waterways due to phosphorus exported from upstream areas of the catchment. In the previous paper, all agents are considered as rational players and two types of equilibria were considered: fully non-cooperative Nash equilibrium and cooperative Pareto optimum solutions. Among the plethora of Pareto optima, the solution corresponding to the equally weighted individual objective functions were selected. In this paper, the cooperative game approach involving the formation of coalitions and modeling of characteristic value function will be applied and Shapley values for the players obtained. A significant contribution of this approach is the construction of a characteristic function which incorporates both the Nash and Pareto equilibria, showing that it is superadditive. It will be shown that this approach will allow each players to obtain payoffs which strictly dominate their payoffs obtained from their Nash equilibria.     

Egalitarian allocation and players of certain type

In cooperative game theory the Shapley value is different from the egalitarian value, the latter of which allocates payoffs equally. The null player property and the nullifying player property assign zero payoff to each null player and each nullifying player, respectively. It is known that if the null player property for characterizing the Shapley value is replaced by the nullifying player property, then the egalitarian value is determined uniquely. We propose several properties to replace the nullifying player property to characterize the egalitarian value. Roughly speaking, the results in this note hint that equal division for players of certain types may lead to the egalitarian allocation.     

The consistent Shapley value for hyperplane games

A new value is defined for n-person hyperplane games, i.e., non-sidepayment cooperative games, such that for each coalition, the Pareto optimal set is linear. This is a generalization of the Shapley value for side-payment games. It is shown that this value is consistent in the sense that the payoff in a given game is related to payoffs in reduced games (obtained by excluding some players) in such a way that corrections demanded by coalitions of a fixed size are cancelled out. Moreover, this is the only consistent value which satisfies Pareto optimality (for the grand coalition), symmetry and covariancy with respect to utility changes of scales. It can be reached by players who start from an arbitrary Pareto optimal payoff vector and make successive adjustments.     

From hierarchies to levels: new solutions for games with hierarchical structure

Recently, applications of cooperative game theory to economic allocation problems have gained popularity. In many of these problems, players are organized according to either a hierarchical structure or a levels structure that restrict the players’ possibilities to cooperate. In this paper, we propose three new solutions for games with hierarchical structure and characterize them by properties that relate a player’s payoff to the payoffs of other players located in specific positions in the hierarchical structure relative to that player. To define each solution, we consider a certain mapping that transforms the hierarchical structure into a levels structure, and then we apply the standard generalization of the Shapley value to the class of games with levels structure. Such transformation mappings are studied by means of properties that relate a player’s position in both types of structure.     

Players indifferent to cooperate and characterizations of the Shapley value

In this paper we provide new axiomatizations of the Shapley value for TU-games using axioms that are based on relational aspects in the interactions among players. Some of these relational aspects, in particular the economic or social interest of each player in cooperating with each other, can be found embedded in the characteristic function. We define a particular relation among the players that it is based on mutual indifference. The first new axiom expresses that the payoffs of two players who are not indifferent to each other are affected in the same way if they become enemies and do not cooperate with each other anymore. The second new axiom expresses that the payoff of a player is not affected if players to whom it is indifferent leave the game. We show that the Shapley value is characterized by these two axioms together with the well-known efficiency axiom. Further, we show that another axiomatization of the Shapley value is obtained if we replace the second axiom and efficiency by the axiom which applies the efficiency condition to every class of indifferent players. Finally, we extend the previous results to the case of weighted Shapley values.     

A non-cooperative foundation for the continuous Raiffa solution

This paper provides a non-cooperative foundation for (asymmetric generalizations of) the continuous Raiffa solution. Specifically, we consider a continuous-time variation of the classic Ståhl–Rubinstein bargaining model, in which there is a finite deadline that ends the negotiations, and in which each player’s opportunity to make proposals is governed by a player-specific Poisson process, in that the rejecter of a proposal becomes proposer at the first next arrival of her process. Under the assumption that future payoffs are not discounted, it is shown that the expected payoffs players realize in subgame perfect equilibrium converge to the continuous Raiffa solution outcome as the deadline tends to infinity. The weights reflecting the asymmetries among the players correspond to the Poisson arrival rates of their respective proposal processes.     

Stochastic games with non-observable actions

We examine n-player stochastic games. These are dynamic games where a play evolves in stages along a finite set of states; at each stage players independently have to choose actions in the present state and these choices determine a stage payoff to each player as well as a transition to a new state where actions have to be chosen at the next stage. For each player the infinite sequence of his stage payoffs is evaluated by taking the limiting average. Normally stochastic games are examined under the condition of full monitoring, i.e. at any stage each player observes the present state and the actions chosen by all players. This paper is a first attempt towards understanding under what circumstances equilibria could exist in n-player stochastic games without full monitoring. We demonstrate the non-existence of -equilibria in n-player stochastic games, with respect to the average reward, when at each stage each player is able to observe the present state, his own action, his own payoff, and the payoffs of the other players, but is unable to observe the actions of them. For this purpose, we present and examine a counterexample with 3 players. If we further drop the assumption that the players can observe the payoffs of the others, then counterexamples already exist in games with only 2 players.     

A generalization of the Egalitarian and the Kalai–Smorodinsky bargaining solutions

We characterize the class of weakly efficient n-person bargaining solutions that solely depend on the ratios of the players’ ideal payoffs. In the case of at least three players the ratio between the solution payoffs of any two players is a power of the ratio between their ideal payoffs. As special cases this class contains the Egalitarian and the Kalai–Smorodinsky bargaining solutions, which can be pinned down by imposing additional axioms.     

An axiomatization of the Shapley value using a fairness property

In this paper we provide an axiomatization of the Shapley value for TU-games using a fairness property. This property states that if to a game we add another game in which two players are symmetric then their payoffs change by the same amount. We show that the Shapley value is characterized by this fairness property, efficiency and the null player property. These three axioms also characterize the Shapley value on the class of simple games. Revised August 2001     

Axiomatizations of Banzhaf permission values for games with a permission structure

In games with a permission structure it is assumed that players in a cooperative transferable utility game are hierarchically ordered in the sense that there are players that need permission from other players before they are allowed to cooperate. We provide axiomatic characterizations of Banzhaf permission values being solutions that are obtained by applying the Banzhaf value to modified TU-games. In these characterizations we use power- and player split neutrality properties. These properties state that splitting a player’s authority and/or contribution over two players does not change the sum of their payoffs.     

Independent mistakes in large games

Economic models usually assume that agents play precise best responses to others' actions. It is sometimes argued that this is a good approximation when there are many agents in the game, because if their mistakes are independent, aggregate uncertainty is small. We study a class of games in which players' payoffs depend solely on their individual actions and on the aggregate of all players' actions. We investigate whether their equilibria are affected by mistakes when the number of players becomes large. Indeed, in generic games with continuous payoff functions, independent mistakes wash out in the limit. This may not be the case if payoffs are discontinuous. As a counter-example we present the n players Nash bargaining game, as well as a large class of “free-rider games.” Received: November 1997/Final version: December 1999     

Nash Equilibrium Seeking in Quadratic Noncooperative Games Under Two Delayed Information-Sharing Schemes

In this paper, we propose non-model-based strategies for locally stable convergence to Nash equilibrium in quadratic noncooperative games where acquisition of information (of two different types) incurs delays. Two sets of results are introduced: (a) one, which we call cooperative scenario, where each player employs the knowledge of the functional form of his payoff and knowledge of other players’ actions, but with delays; and (b) the second one, which we term the noncooperative scenario, where the players have access only to their own payoff values, again with delay. Both approaches are based on the extremum seeking perspective, which has previously been reported for real-time optimization problems by exploring sinusoidal excitation signals to estimate the Gradient (first derivative) and Hessian (second derivative) of unknown quadratic functions. In order to compensate distinct delays in the inputs of the players, we have employed predictor feedback. We apply a small-gain analysis as well as averaging theory in infinite dimensions, due to the infinite-dimensional state of the time delays, in order to obtain local convergence results for the unknown quadratic payoffs to a small neighborhood of the Nash equilibrium. We quantify the size of these residual sets and corroborate the theoretical results numerically on an example of a two-player game with delays.

     

Power Measures and Solutions for Games Under Precedence Constraints

Games under precedence constraints model situations, where players in a cooperative transferable utility game belong to some hierarchical structure, which is represented by an acyclic digraph (partial order). In this paper, we introduce the class of precedence power solutions for games under precedence constraints. These solutions are obtained by allocating the dividends in the game proportional to some power measure for acyclic digraphs. We show that all these solutions satisfy the desirable axiom of irrelevant player independence, which establishes that the payoffs assigned to relevant players are not affected by the presence of irrelevant players. We axiomatize these precedence power solutions using irrelevant player independence and an axiom that uses a digraph power measure. We give special attention to the hierarchical solution, which applies the hierarchical measure. We argue how this solution is related to the known precedence Shapley value, which does not satisfy irrelevant player independence, and thus is not a precedence power solution. We also axiomatize the hierarchical measure as a digraph power measure.