Genetics in primary care: a USA faculty development initiative

The Genetics in Primary Care (GPC) project is a USA national faculty development initiative with the goal of enhancing the training of medical students and primary care residents by developing primary care faculty expertise in genetics. Educational strategies were developed for the project by an executive committee with input from an advisory committee, comprising individuals with primary care, medical education and genetics expertise. These committees identified the key issues in genetics education for primary care as (1) considering inherited disease in the differential diagnosis of common disorders; (2) using appropriate counseling strategies for genetic testing and diagnosis, and (3) understanding the implications of a genetic diagnosis for family members. The group emphasized the importance of a primary care perspective, which suggests that the clinical utility of genetic information is greatest when it has the potential to improve health outcomes. The group also noted that clinical practice already incorporates the use of family history information, providing a basis for discussing the application of genetic concepts in primary care. Genetics and primary care experts agreed that educational efforts will be most successful if they are integrated into existing primary care teaching programs, and use a case-based teaching format that incorporates both clinical and social dimensions of genetic disorders. Three core clinical skills were identified: (1) interpreting family history; (2) recognizing the variable clinical utility of genetic information, and (3) acquiring cultural competency. Three areas of potential controversy were identified as well: (1) the role of nondirective counseling versus shared decision-making in discussions of genetic testing; (2) the intrinsic value of genetic information when it does not influence health outcomes, and (3) indications for a genetics referral. The project provides an opportunity for ongoing discussion about these important issues.     

Improving access to and utilization of genetic services in Arizona's Hispanic population

This abstract presents a model project aimed to train community lay health workers about genetics, increase cultural competency of genetic services providers, and provide local access to genetic services in primarily Hispanic communities in the state of Arizona. Health Start, a community-based prenatal outreach program, served as the basis for providing genetic education and services. A genetics training curriculum was developed and training of community lay health workers was provided. Cultural and Spanish language training was provided for all genetic services providers. Pediatric genetics outreach clinics were established in eight communities. Community-based lay health workers eagerly incorporate genetic information into their public health knowledge base, but this may not lead to acceptance of these personnel by local health care providers as sources of referrals for specialized health services such as genetics. Cultural competence training of genetic service providers is enthusiastically accepted and utilized in the provision of locally accessible genetics clinics.     

Genetics teaching for non-geneticist health care professionals in the UK

OBJECTIVES: It was the aim of this study to describe the structure and content of training in genetics for non-genetics specialist health care professionals in the UK. METHODS: Data were collected by assessment of published syllabi and curricula and through contact with educational leads at responsible organisations. RESULTS: Twenty-six universities, 7 Royal Colleges and various intercollegiate boards and committees are involved in the provision of medical education at various levels, in addition to institutions offering nursing and/or midwifery training. Genetics is taught in variable formats, quantities and contents, and although some institutions are moving to adopt minimum competencies in genetics, this is by no means widespread. CONCLUSIONS: Given the wide number of stakeholders in the field, consensus competencies seem most likely to advance practice, and thus, phase II of the GenEd project will survey professionals to ascertain their priorities for genetic education.     

What role for public health in genetics and vice versa?

Some epidemiologists and geneticists claim that integrating genetics into public health policies and programs is necessary and unavoidable. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which further integration of public health and genetics is warranted. METHODS: Synthesis of the literature in four areas: research, genetic services, regulation, and education. The analysis is limited to human genetics. RESULTS: Public support for basic genetic research has and will continue to lead to new applications and to further understanding of human origins and dispersions. Some applied research, particularly for genetic risk factors for common complex diseases, has low yield and is better supported by private funds. The only genetic service for which a public health role is paramount is newborn screening. With the patenting of genes, and the proliferation of commercial interests in genetic tests and directly advertising them to the public, regulation by public health agencies is increasingly important. As most genetic testing and other services will be provided in the personal health care system, education about genetics is best left to the educational and medical systems. Public health practitioners should be aware of the limitations of genetic tests. CONCLUSIONS: There is little need for further integration of genetic services and education into public health especially in countries in which public and private health services are dichotomized. Newborn screening and follow-up, however, are most safely and effectively provided under public health auspices. The most important area for strengthening the public health role is in the regulation of genetic tests and other genetic services provided primarily by the private sector. Continued support for basic genetic research is needed.     

International cooperation and networking in genetic health care provision: issues arising from the genetic services plan for the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy

The aims of this report are to describe the genetic plan for Emilia-Romagna, a region in Italy, and to contribute to the international exchange of information on developing and applying policy frameworks to provide high-quality and comprehensive genetic health care in the publicly funded health systems. At the present time there is no national policy for genetic medicine in Italy, and only two regions, Emilia-Romagna and Liguria, have formally agreed to a strategic plan for health care in genetics. The current provision of genetic services in Emilia-Romagna is described focusing on the intra- and inter-organizational linkages to ensure a comprehensive system of coordinated activities. Strengths and implementation areas are highlighted. Points that must be solved within the regional or national context are the definition of the level of assistance required in genetic medicine, the formal professional recognition of the genetic counselor and the adjustment of the billing mechanisms to the complexities of clinical genetic services. Issues that need to be addressed at a wider level include full assessment of genetic tests before their introduction into clinical practice, networking to provide tests for the rarest genetic diseases, consensus on fundamental terminology and clinical and administrative data sets to promote a cohesive framework for the flow of information throughout the health care systems with respect to genetics.     

Education in medical genetics for non-genetic health care providers in Sweden

We investigated the content and extent of education in medical/clinical genetics among Swedish universities, university colleges and colleges of health providing undergraduate education for medical doctors and nurses. In addition, selected medical specialist training programmes and programmes for midwives and district nurses were analysed to detect elements of education or training in medical/clinical genetics. The main results are that, although basic cell biology is taught during the first semesters in all education, there is little or no genetics taught during the clinical parts of the educational programmes. Moreover, with regard to post-graduate education, it is almost absent. There is a need to improve education and training in genetics for all health care professionals to meet the expected increase in genetic issues in clinical medicine.     

Strengthening genetic services in primary care for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders

The Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations (AAPCHO) is a national membership organization of community health centers (CHCs) that serve medically underserved Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) with limited English-speaking proficiency and low income. OBJECTIVES: In 1995, AAPCHO was funded for a 3-year national genetics training project to improve genetics training among primary care providers at CHCs and strengthen linkages with tertiary genetic centers (TGCs). Three model linkages between CHCs and TGCs were documented on the coordination of genetic services for medically underserved AAPIs. METHODS: Guidelines were developed for three CHCs to document their genetic programs and linkages with TGCs. In addition, one clinic conducted a mail survey to assess understanding of prenatal genetic counseling sessions by patients that visited the clinic during the past 2 years. RESULTS: Model linkages between CHCs and TGCs to improve cultural and linguistic accessibility for patients include formal coordination between the CHCs and TGCs for the delivery of genetic services and the provision of varying levels of genetic services at the CHC. From the patient survey, there was a 59% response rate among 70 surveys mailed to former patients. The survey results showed that while a majority of patients understood and recalled key genetic concepts, one-fifth of patients experienced difficulty understanding their genetic counseling sessions. CONCLUSION: Based on model linkages between CHCs and TGCs and the patient satisfaction survey results, the following strategies are recommended to improve accessibility of genetic services for medically underserved AAPIs: (1) genetics education should be developed for all levels of health center staff; (2) counseling should be culturally sensitive and focus on key issues that must be conveyed for appropriate informed consent; (3) genetics education should employ the use of translated audiovisual aids and brochures to improve understanding; (4) genetic services should be coordinated between CHCs and TGCs to provide culturally and linguistically competent care for medically underserved AAPIs, and (5) financial mechanisms should be available to support genetic testing of patients and their families with little or no coverage for genetic services.     

Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations

OBJECTIVE: New medical discoveries regarding genetic susceptibility to common chronic diseases, and the decoding of the human genome have increased public attention to genetics. What information is understood and what attitudes exist towards genetics and genetic research have not been well examined in underserved, culturally diverse communities. METHODS: To better understand attitudes and beliefs towards genetics and genetic testing in these groups, we conducted eight focus groups with 55 patients and health care workers in New York City and Westchester, N.Y., in English, Spanish, and Chinese. RESULTS: Focus group participants had limited understanding about genetics or genetic testing. Newborn screening was the least-known genetic issue, even among health care workers. Regardless of their cultural group, most participants expressed a desire for more information about genetics and genetic tests. Latinos and Chinese participants generally expressed positive attitudes towards genetic studies and genetic testing, with the possibility of preventing diseases cited as the main advantage. Black Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites reported mixed feelings about genetic research and genetic testing. Concerns expressed included: anxiety before receiving test results or waiting for a disease to develop, fear of genetic discrimination by health and life insurance companies and employers, not having the financial means to deal with genetic diseases in themselves or a sick child, concern that children and adults are having too many tests. Black Americans expressed the most concern for possibly harmful use of genetic information. CONCLUSIONS: Minority populations of diverse cultures have limited knowledge about genetics and genetic testing, would like to have more information, and are not well reached by the current educational approaches. Participants knew the least about newborn screening, a test that is mandatory in the New York State. While genetic knowledge by minority populations was perhaps not different from the level of knowledge of consumers in general, minority populations are at particular risk of being left behind because of historically poor access to information and services.     

DNA on loan: issues to consider when carrying out genetic research with aboriginal families and communities

In the current research milieu where genetic etiology is considered a critical component in the discovery of pathogenesis, aboriginal families and communities affected with genetic conditions may be considered as research participants. However, because of concerns about the impact of genetic information and historical harmful research practices, some aboriginal communities have considerable unease when faced with this prospect. Therefore, in the circumstance that genetics is considered an important part of research inquiry by aboriginal families and communities, there needs to be assurance that the research will be carried out according to mutual expectations. A research relationship that respects aboriginal individuals and communities within their culture and is in keeping with their values is essential. This respect extends to the use of biological samples, considering the DNA to be 'on loan' to the researcher for the purpose of the research for which consent was obtained. This paper will explore practical ways of maintaining a respectful research relationship when genetics research with aboriginal people is undertaken.     

Clinical genetics in developing countries: the case of Brazil

There are many impediments to the progress of clinical and medical genetics in developing countries. Higher priorities concerning basic health care usually take precedence over genetic diseases and birth defects among medical professionals and public health officials. This is so in spite of the fact that the global prevalence of these conditions seems higher than in the developed world and that limited resources enhance the burden on individuals, families and populations. Furthermore, as a consequence of recent advances in medical genetics, demand for genetic services has increased, reinforcing the need for programs for the management and prevention of genetic diseases and birth defects, especially at primary health care level. An overview of these issues in Brazil is presented here, with information on the health system, the evolution of medical and clinical genetics in the country, and the situation of medical and clinical genetic services. We discuss proposals for implementing appropriate, ethically acceptable and equitable clinical genetic services for the Brazilian population.     

Genetic services in Colombia

Medical genetic services, including clinical genetics, cytogenetics, biochemical and molecular genetics and paternity testing, are performed in Colombia in the more developed medical schools or university institutions, in nine major cities of the country. Accessibility to genetic services is limited by medical care reimbursement laws which do not cover clinical genetic services nor genetic tests. Paternity testing is performed free of charge by a governmental welfare institution, if a legal claim is made against an alleged father. Basic teaching of genetics in medical schools is mandatory, but is very uneven and limited to the better schools. Postgraduate medical genetic training is offered by four different programs of similar quality. Research is performed on some of the most prevalent genetic conditions and on population genetic issues.     

Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were (1) to explore public experiences, genetic knowledge, expectations of future medical genetic developments, and the attitudes towards the use of genetic information, and (2) to determine whether there are subject characteristics associated with these variables. METHODS: Participants (n = 1,308, age > or = 25 years) of a Dutch consumer panel were sent a questionnaire, specifically designed for this study. RESULTS: Response was 63% (817/1,308). A minority of respondents reported to know someone with a hereditary disease (34%) or to have used a genetic test (8%). Overall, 57% perceived a lack of genetic knowledge. In multivariate analyses, high self-rated knowledge, younger age, having heard of genetic testing, high educational level, female gender, having children living at home, being a health professional, and familiarity with genetic testing were positively associated with genetic knowledge. Future expectations of the consequences of developments in medical genetics varied between the subjects. The great majority expected great benefits for medical practice such as an increasing use of genetic aspects of disease for diagnosis or prevention. One fifth, mainly older people, anticipated a negative impact of genetic developments on society. The results also show that most people are reserved to share their genetic information with others, especially with regard to the wider public domain (e.g. industry and insurers) and employers. Remarkably, respondents were more willing to share their genetic information with scientific researchers (68%) than with their relatives (54%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that although one fifth anticipates negative consequences of genetic developments, the great majority has high expectations about the increasing use of genetics in prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases. In developing educational programmes about genetic innovations in medicine, policymakers will have to take into account pre-existing lay knowledge, views and expectations of different groups of citizens towards these developments.     

Community genetic services in Latin America and regional network of medical genetics. Recommendations of a World Health Organization consultation

The World Health Organization sponsored a Consultation on Community Genetic Services and a Regional Network of Medical Genetics in Latin America in Porto Alegre, Brazil, on June 19, 2003. The main recommendations of the meeting included: (a) the call for government funding of services, research and education in medical genetics; (b) the conduct of epidemiological research on the prevalence and types of birth defects, genetic disorders and genetic predispositions to common diseases; (c) the education of health professionals in genetics; (d) the education of genetic professionals in community health and public health genetics; (e) the fostering of interactions between clinical geneticists, public health personnel, primary health care workers and community organizations, and (f) a better planning of regionalized services to avoid duplication and inefficiency.     

Genetic services in Latin America

This special issue of Community Genetics reviews some of the most important developments in medical genetics in key countries of Latin America. Contributions to this issue were prepared for a special consultation of the World Health Organization held in Porto Alegre, Brazil, on June 19, 2003. Latin America is a region of medium- to low-income countries characterized by socioeconomic problems, with large segments of the population living in poverty and extreme disparities in the distribution of wealth. A rise in chronic diseases typical of the processes of industrialization and urbanization coexists with the persistence of nutritional and infectious diseases characteristic of poverty and underdevelopment. Over the last 2 decades of the 20th century, birth defects and genetic disorders have increased their share of morbidity and mortality, and tertiary-care-based genetic services have developed in urban areas. Although privatization of health care is eroding the public sector, the public institutions continue to be the main providers of genetic services for the bulk of the population and the leaders in research. The development of clinical genetics in the region is concentrated in tertiary-care centers in large cities, although a recent trend began extending genetic services to the community.     

Genetic education for non-geneticist health professionals

OBJECTIVES: It was the aim of this study to assess educational needs and priorities in genetics amongst non-genetic health professionals. METHODS: The methods used included website reviews and direct contact with individuals and organisations involved in health professional education. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Health professional education and training differed in structure with wide variation in the content and duration of genetics education provided. Evidence from the UK, France and Germany indicates that genetics professionals are influencing the genetics content of medical curricula. In post-graduate training, some specialist regulators have adopted specific genetics education requirements, but many programmes lack any explicit genetics. We show that within each country, a sometimes confusing plethora of organisations has responsibility for setting, assessing and delivering medical and midwifery education.     

Genetic counseling for the public?

The widespread availability of diagnostic tools for numerous inherited diseases requires diligent decision-making regarding the risks and benefits, not only for the individual but also at the population level. Should therefore genetic counseling be offered to the entire population at risk for genetic diseases? In our opinion, the goals of public health may only be reached by serving primarily the individual at risk and his/her family. Efforts in public health genetics should be focused on appropriate genetic counseling, especially regarding common diseases with complex genetic components in the near future.     

France: genetics education for non-genetics health care providers

OBJECTIVE: This paper explores the treatment of medical genetics in undergraduate medical education, specialists' training and continuing medical education (CME) for general practitioners, specialists, nurses and midwives. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative survey of websites, published or unpublished documents, telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires. RESULTS: Genetics is a medical specialty in France, and the small number of university professors in genetics are in charge of the genetic component of medical training of all future practitioners. The study was complicated by the ongoing waves of reforms in the French health and educational systems and by the autonomy of the faculties. Specialist training and CME in genetics is heterogeneous and not organised as a priority. CONCLUSIONS: Specialist education and CME in genetics of non-geneticist health care providers needs to be adapted to the fast ongoing developments of this field of knowledge.     

Knowledge about medical genetics in health care

Effective genetic services depend upon co-operation between medical geneticists and many different non-geneticist professionals to ensure that the most appropriate patients are referred to geneticists and that those that require long-term care receive it. Important determinants of the quality of genetic services are the knowledge that professionals have about clinical genetics and the equitable distribution of adequately resourced genetic centres. Consequently, we have investigated in a European context how much clinically relevant genetics non-geneticists know, how competent non-geneticists are in counselling their own patients, how well equipped specialist genetic centres are, who refers to genetic centres and what they refer and who offers continuing care to patients and families whose problems are not resolvable at a limited genetic clinic visit.     

Family physicians' beliefs about genetic contributions to racial/ethnic and gender differences in health and clinical decision-making

Greater attention towards genetics as a contributor to group health differences may lead to inappropriate use of race/ethnicity and gender as genetic heuristics and exacerbate health disparities. As part of a web-based survey, 1,035 family physicians (FPs) rated the contribution of genetics and environment to racial/ethnic and gender differences in health outcomes, and the importance of race/ethnicity and gender in their clinical decision-making. FPs attributed racial/ethnic and gender differences in health outcomes equally to environment and genetics. These beliefs were not associated with rated importance of race/ethnicity or gender in clinical decision-making. FPs appreciate the complexity of genetic and environmental influences on health differences by race/ethnicity and gender.     

The burden of genetic disorders in India and a framework for community control

With a very large population and high birth rate, and consanguineous marriage favoured in many communities, there is a high prevalence of genetic disorders in India. An estimated 495,000 infants with congenital malformations, 390,000 with G6PD deficiency, 21,400 with Down syndrome, 9,000 with beta-thalassaemia, 5,200 with sickle cell disease, and 9,760 with amino acid disorders are born each year. The prevalence of late-onset multi-factorial disorders (including coronary artery disease, hypertension and psychiatric disorders) is also large. Due to inadequate diagnostic, management and rehabilitation facilities, the burden of these disorders is greater than in Western countries. Although genetic diseases receive little attention from the health services, research funding by the government has been liberal. Community control of common disorders like thalassaemia, Down syndrome, neural tube defects, and muscular dystrophies deserves high priority, and genetic services should be integrated into the existing primary health care and medical services. Most genetic counselling would have to be provided through training physicians who staff the district and medical school hospitals. To ensure future progress, there is a need to establish additional departments of medical genetics in medical schools.