Temporal and spectral masking release in low- and mid-frequency regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

"Masking release" (MR), the improvement of speech intelligibility in modulated compared with unmodulated maskers, is typically smaller than normal for hearing-impaired listeners. The extent to which this is due to reduced audibility or to suprathreshold processing deficits is unclear. Here, the effects of audibility were controlled by using stimuli restricted to the low- (≤1.5 kHz) or mid-frequency (1-3 kHz) region for normal-hearing listeners and hearing-impaired listeners with near-normal hearing in the tested region. Previous work suggests that the latter may have suprathreshold deficits. Both spectral and temporal MR were measured. Consonant identification was measured in quiet and in the presence of unmodulated, amplitude-modulated, and spectrally modulated noise at three signal-to-noise ratios (the same ratios for the two groups). For both frequency regions, consonant identification was poorer for the hearing-impaired than for the normal-hearing listeners in all conditions. The results suggest the presence of suprathreshold deficits for the hearing-impaired listeners, despite near-normal audiometric thresholds over the tested frequency regions. However, spectral MR and temporal MR were similar for the two groups. Thus, the suprathreshold deficits for the hearing-impaired group did not lead to reduced MR.     

Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the 1-kHz frequency region

Relations between perception of suprathreshold speech and auditory functions were examined in 24 hearing-impaired listeners and 12 normal-hearing listeners. The speech intelligibility index (SII) was used to account for audibility. The auditory functions included detection efficiency, temporal and spectral resolution, temporal and spectral integration, and discrimination of intensity, frequency, rhythm, and spectro-temporal shape. All auditory functions were measured at 1 kHz. Speech intelligibility was assessed with the speech-reception threshold (SRT) in quiet and in noise, and with the speech-reception bandwidth threshold (SRBT), previously developed for investigating speech perception in a limited frequency region around 1 kHz. The results showed that the elevated SRT in quiet could be explained on the basis of audibility. Audibility could only partly account for the elevated SRT values in noise and the deviant SRBT values, suggesting that suprathreshold deficits affected intelligibility in these conditions. SII predictions for the SRBT improved significantly by including the individually measured upward spread of masking in the SII model. Reduced spectral resolution, reduced temporal resolution, and reduced frequency discrimination appeared to be related to speech perception deficits. Loss of peripheral compression appeared to have the smallest effect on the intelligibility of suprathreshold speech.     

Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing

The speech-reception threshold (SRT) for sentences presented in a fluctuating interfering background sound of 80 dBA SPL is measured for 20 normal-hearing listeners and 20 listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. The interfering sounds range from steady-state noise, via modulated noise, to a single competing voice. Two voices are used, one male and one female, and the spectrum of the masker is shaped according to these voices. For both voices, the SRT is measured as well in noise spectrally shaped according to the target voice as shaped according to the other voice. The results show that, for normal-hearing listeners, the SRT for sentences in modulated noise is 4-6 dB lower than for steady-state noise; for sentences masked by a competing voice, this difference is 6-8 dB. For listeners with moderate sensorineural hearing loss, elevated thresholds are obtained without an appreciable effect of masker fluctuations. The implications of these results for estimating a hearing handicap in everyday conditions are discussed. By using the articulation index (AI), it is shown that hearing-impaired individuals perform poorer than suggested by the loss of audibility for some parts of the speech signal. Finally, three mechanisms are discussed that contribute to the absence of unmasking by masker fluctuations in hearing-impaired listeners. The low sensation level at which the impaired listeners receive the masker seems a major determinant. The second and third factors are: reduced temporal resolution and a reduction in comodulation masking release, respectively.     

The effect of hearing impairment on the identification of speech that is modulated synchronously or asynchronously across frequency

This study investigated the effect of mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss on the ability to identify speech in noise for vowel-consonant-vowel tokens that were either unprocessed, amplitude modulated synchronously across frequency, or amplitude modulated asynchronously across frequency. One goal of the study was to determine whether hearing-impaired listeners have a particular deficit in the ability to integrate asynchronous spectral information in the perception of speech. Speech tokens were presented at a high, fixed sound level and the level of a speech-shaped noise was changed adaptively to estimate the masked speech identification threshold. The performance of the hearing-impaired listeners was generally worse than that of the normal-hearing listeners, but the impaired listeners showed particularly poor performance in the synchronous modulation condition. This finding suggests that integration of asynchronous spectral information does not pose a particular difficulty for hearing-impaired listeners with mild/moderate hearing losses. Results are discussed in terms of common mechanisms that might account for poor speech identification performance of hearing-impaired listeners when either the masking noise or the speech is synchronously modulated.     

Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment

The goal of this study was to determine the extent to which the difficulty experienced by impaired listeners in understanding noisy speech can be explained on the basis of elevated tone-detection thresholds. Twenty-one impaired ears of 15 subjects, spanning a variety of audiometric configurations with average hearing losses to 75 dB, were tested for reception of consonants in a speech-spectrum noise. Speech level, noise level, and frequency-gain characteristic were varied to generate a range of listening conditions. Results for impaired listeners were compared to those of normal-hearing listeners tested under the same conditions with extra noise added to approximate the impaired listeners' detection thresholds. Results for impaired and normal listeners were also compared on the basis of articulation indices. Consonant recognition by this sample of impaired listeners was generally comparable to that of normal-hearing listeners with similar threshold shifts listening under the same conditions. When listening conditions were equated for articulation index, there was no clear dependence of consonant recognition on average hearing loss. Assuming that the primary consequence of the threshold simulation in normals is loss of audibility (as opposed to suprathreshold discrimination or resolution deficits), it is concluded that the primary source of difficulty in listening in noise for listeners with moderate or milder hearing impairments, aside from the noise itself, is the loss of audibility.     

Temporal integration, frequency resolution, and off-frequency listening in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners

Temporal integration for a 1000-Hz signal was determined for normal-hearing and cochlear hearing-impaired listeners in quiet and in masking noise of variable bandwidth. Critical ratio and 3-dB critical band measures of frequency resolution were derived from the masking data. Temporal integration for the normal-hearing listeners was markedly reduced in narrow-band noise, when contrasted with temporal integration in quiet or in wideband noise. The effect of noise bandwidth on temporal integration was smaller for the hearing-impaired group. Hearing-impaired subjects showed both reduced temporal integration and reduced frequency resolution for the 200-ms signal. However, a direct relation between temporal integration and frequency resolution was not indicated. Frequency resolution for the normal-hearing listeners did not differ from that of the hearing-impaired listeners for the 20-ms signal. It was suggested that some of the frequency resolution and temporal integration differences between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners could be accounted for by off-frequency listening.     

Spectrotemporal analysis and cochlear hearing impairment: effects of frequency selectivity, temporal resolution, signal frequency, and rate of modulation

The detection of 500- or 2000-Hz pure-tone signals in unmodulated and modulated noise was investigated in normal-hearing and sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners, as a function of noise bandwidth. Square-wave modulation rates of 15 and 40 Hz were used in the modulated noise conditions. A notched noise measure of frequency selectivity and a gap detection measure of temporal resolution were also obtained on each subject. The modulated noise results indicated a masking release that increased as a function of increasing noise bandwidth, and as a function of decreasing modulation rate for both groups of listeners. However, the improvement of threshold with increasing modulated noise bandwidth was often greatly reduced among the sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners. It was hypothesized that the masking release in modulated noise may be due to several types of processes including across-critical band analysis (CMR), within-critical band analysis, and suppression. Within-band effects appeared to be especially large at the higher frequency region and lower modulation rate. In agreement with previous research, there was a significant correlation between frequency selectivity and masking release in modulated noise. At the 500-Hz region, masking release was correlated more highly with the filter skirt and tail measures than with the filter passband measure. At the 2000-Hz region, masking release was correlated more with the filter passband and skirt measures than with the filter tail measure. The correlation between gap detection and masking release was significant at the 40-Hz modulation rate, but not at the 15-Hz modulation rate. The results of this study suggest that masking release in modulated noise is limited by frequency selectivity at low modulation rates, and by both frequency selectivity and temporal resolution at high modulation rates. However, even when the present measures of frequency selectivity and temporal resolution are both taken into account, significant variance in masking release still remains unaccounted for.     

Effects of background noise level on behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression

Hearing-impaired (HI) listeners often show poorer performance on psychoacoustic tasks than do normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Although some such deficits may reflect changes in suprathreshold sound processing, others may be due to stimulus audibility and the elevated absolute thresholds associated with hearing loss. Masking noise can be used to raise the thresholds of NH to equal the thresholds in quiet of HI listeners. However, such noise may have other effects, including changing peripheral response characteristics, such as the compressive input-output function of the basilar membrane in the normal cochlea. This study estimated compression behaviorally across a range of background noise levels in NH listeners at a 4 kHz signal frequency, using a growth of forward masking paradigm. For signals 5 dB or more above threshold in noise, no significant effect of broadband noise level was found on estimates of compression. This finding suggests that broadband noise does not significantly alter the compressive response of the basilar membrane to sounds that are presented well above their threshold in the noise. Similarities between the performance of HI listeners and NH listeners in threshold-equalizing noise are therefore unlikely to be due to a linearization of basilar-membrane responses to suprathreshold stimuli in the NH listeners.     

Measuring the threshold for speech reception by adaptive variation of the signal bandwidth. II. Hearing-impaired listeners

In a previous study [Noordhoek et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 2895-2902 (1999)], an adaptive test was developed to determine the speech-reception bandwidth threshold (SRBT), i.e., the width of a speech band around 1 kHz required for a 50% intelligibility score. In this test, the band-filtered speech is presented in complementary bandstop-filtered noise. In the present study, the performance of 34 hearing-impaired listeners was measured on this SRBT test and on more common SRT (speech-reception threshold) tests, namely the SRT in quiet, the standard SRT in noise (standard speech spectrum), and the spectrally adapted SRT in noise (fitted to the individual's dynamic range). The aim was to investigate to what extent the performance on these tests could be explained simply from audibility, as estimated with the SII (speech intelligibility index) model, or require the assumption of suprathreshold deficits. For most listeners, an elevated SRT in quiet or an elevated standard SRT in noise could be explained on the basis of audibility. For the spectrally adapted SRT in noise, and especially for the SRBT, the data of most listeners could not be explained from audibility, suggesting that the effects of suprathreshold deficits may be present. Possibly, such a deficit is an increased downward spread of masking.     

Effects of spectral smearing on the identification of speech in noise filtered into low- and mid-frequency regions

Le?ger et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 1502-1514 (2012)] reported deficits in the identification of consonants in noise by hearing-impaired listeners using stimuli filtered into low- or mid-frequency regions in which audiometric thresholds were normal or near-normal. The deficits could not be fully explained in terms of reduced audibility or temporal-envelope processing. However, previous studies indicate that the listeners may have had reduced frequency selectivity, with auditory filters broadened by a factor of about 1.3, despite having normal or near-normal audiometric thresholds in the tested regions. The present study aimed to determine whether the speech-perception deficits could be explained by such a small reduction of frequency selectivity. Consonant identification was measured for normal-hearing listeners in quiet and in unmodulated and modulated noises using the same method as Le?ger et al. The signal-to-noise ratio was set to -3 dB for the masked conditions. Various amounts of reduced frequency selectivity were simulated using a spectral-smearing algorithm. Performance was reduced only for spectral-smearing factors greater than 1.7. For all conditions, identification scores for hearing-impaired listeners could not be explained by a mild reduction of frequency selectivity.     

Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions

Articulation index (AI) theory was used to evaluate stop-consonant recognition of normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. From results reported in a companion article [Dubno et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 347-354 (1989)], a transfer function relating the AI to stop-consonant recognition was established, and a frequency importance function was determined for the nine stop-consonant-vowel syllables used as test stimuli. The calculations included the rms and peak levels of the speech that had been measured in 1/3 octave bands; the internal noise was estimated from the thresholds for each subject. The AI model was then used to predict performance for the hearing-impaired listeners. A majority of the AI predictions for the hearing-impaired subjects fell within +/- 2 standard deviations of the normal-hearing listeners' results. However, as observed in previous data, the AI tended to overestimate performance of the hearing-impaired listeners. The accuracy of the predictions decreased with the magnitude of high-frequency hearing loss. Thus, with the exception of performance for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss, the results suggest that poorer speech recognition among hearing-impaired listeners results from reduced audibility within critical spectral regions of the speech stimuli.     

Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers

Speech recognition performance was measured in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners with maskers consisting of either steady-state speech-spectrum-shaped noise or a competing sentence. Target sentences from a male talker were presented in the presence of one of three competing talkers (same male, different male, or female) or speech-spectrum-shaped noise generated from this talker at several target-to-masker ratios. For the normal-hearing listeners, target-masker combinations were processed through a noise-excited vocoder designed to simulate a cochlear implant. With unprocessed stimuli, a normal-hearing control group maintained high levels of intelligibility down to target-to-masker ratios as low as 0 dB and showed a release from masking, producing better performance with single-talker maskers than with steady-state noise. In contrast, no masking release was observed in either implant or normal-hearing subjects listening through an implant simulation. The performance of the simulation and implant groups did not improve when the single-talker masker was a different talker compared to the same talker as the target speech, as was found in the normal-hearing control. These results are interpreted as evidence for a significant role of informational masking and modulation interference in cochlear implant speech recognition with fluctuating maskers. This informational masking may originate from increased target-masker similarity when spectral resolution is reduced.     

Vowel perception by noise masked normal-hearing young adults

This study examined vowel perception by young normal-hearing (YNH) adults, in various listening conditions designed to simulate mild-to-moderate sloping sensorineural hearing loss. YNH listeners were individually age- and gender-matched to young hearing-impaired (YHI) listeners tested in a previous study [Richie et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2923-2933 (2003)]. YNH listeners were tested in three conditions designed to create equal audibility with the YHI listeners; a low signal level with and without a simulated hearing loss, and a high signal level with a simulated hearing loss. Listeners discriminated changes in synthetic vowel tokens /I e epsilon alpha ae/ when Fl or F2 varied in frequency. Comparison of YNH with YHI results failed to reveal significant differences between groups in terms of performance on vowel discrimination, in conditions of similar audibility by using both noise masking to elevate the hearing thresholds of the YNH and applying frequency-specific gain to the YHI listeners. Further, analysis of learning curves suggests that while the YHI listeners completed an average of 46% more test blocks than YNH listeners, the YHI achieved a level of discrimination similar to that of the YNH within the same number of blocks. Apparently, when age and gender are closely matched between young hearing-impaired and normal-hearing adults, performance on vowel tasks may be explained by audibility alone.     

Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners

Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for sentences were determined in stationary and modulated background noise for two age-matched groups of normal-hearing (N = 13) and hearing-impaired listeners (N = 21). Correlations were studied between the SRT in noise and measures of auditory and nonauditory performance, after which stepwise regression analyses were performed within both groups separately. Auditory measures included the pure-tone audiogram and tests of spectral and temporal acuity. Nonauditory factors were assessed by measuring the text reception threshold (TRT), a visual analogue of the SRT, in which partially masked sentences were adaptively presented. Results indicate that, for the normal-hearing group, the variance in speech reception is mainly associated with nonauditory factors, both in stationary and in modulated noise. For the hearing-impaired group, speech reception in stationary noise is mainly related to the audiogram, even when audibility effects are accounted for. In modulated noise, both auditory (temporal acuity) and nonauditory factors (TRT) contribute to explaining interindividual differences in speech reception. Age was not a significant factor in the results. It is concluded that, under some conditions, nonauditory factors are relevant for the perception of speech in noise. Further evaluation of nonauditory factors might enable adapting the expectations from auditory rehabilitation in clinical settings.     

Pitch strength and pitch dominance of iterated rippled noises in hearing-impaired listeners.

Reports using a variety of psychophysical tasks indicate that pitch perception by hearing-impaired listeners may be abnormal, contributing to difficulties in understanding speech and enjoying music. Pitches of complex sounds may be weaker and more indistinct in the presence of cochlear damage, especially when frequency regions are affected that form the strongest basis for pitch perception in normal-hearing listeners. In this study, the strength of the complex pitch generated by iterated rippled noise was assessed in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Pitch strength was measured for broadband noises with spectral ripples generated by iteratively delaying a copy of a given noise and adding it back into the original. Octave-band-pass versions of these noises also were evaluated to assess frequency dominance regions for rippled-noise pitch. Hearing-impaired listeners demonstrated consistently weaker pitches in response to the rippled noises relative to pitch strength in normal-hearing listeners. However, in most cases, the frequency regions of pitch dominance, i.e., strongest pitch, were similar to those observed in normal-hearing listeners. Except where there exists a substantial sensitivity loss, contributions from normal pitch dominance regions associated with the strongest pitches may not be directly related to impaired spectral processing. It is suggested that the reduced strength of rippled-noise pitch in listeners with hearing loss results from impaired frequency resolution and possibly an associated deficit in temporal processing.     

Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners

Many competing noises in real environments are modulated or fluctuating in level. Listeners with normal hearing are able to take advantage of temporal gaps in fluctuating maskers. Listeners with sensorineural hearing loss show less benefit from modulated maskers. Cochlear implant users may be more adversely affected by modulated maskers because of their limited spectral resolution and by their reliance on envelope-based signal-processing strategies of implant processors. The current study evaluated cochlear implant users' ability to understand sentences in the presence of modulated speech-shaped noise. Normal-hearing listeners served as a comparison group. Listeners repeated IEEE sentences in quiet, steady noise, and modulated noise maskers. Maskers were presented at varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at six modulation rates varying from 1 to 32 Hz. Results suggested that normal-hearing listeners obtain significant release from masking from modulated maskers, especially at 8-Hz masker modulation frequency. In contrast, cochlear implant users experience very little release from masking from modulated maskers. The data suggest, in fact, that they may show negative effects of modulated maskers at syllabic modulation rates (2-4 Hz). Similar patterns of results were obtained from implant listeners using three different devices with different speech-processor strategies. The lack of release from masking occurs in implant listeners independent of their device characteristics, and may be attributable to the nature of implant processing strategies and/or the lack of spectral detail in processed stimuli.     

Audibility and recognition of stop consonants in normal and hearing-impaired subjects

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of spectral-cue audibility on the recognition of stop consonants in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults. Subjects identified six synthetic CV speech tokens in a closed-set response task. Each syllable differed only in the initial 40-ms consonant portion of the stimulus. In order to relate performance to spectral-cue audibility, the initial 40 ms of each CV were analyzed via FFT and the resulting spectral array was passed through a sliding-filter model of the human auditory system to account for logarithmic representation of frequency and the summation of stimulus energy within critical bands. This allowed the spectral data to be displayed in comparison to a subject's sensitivity thresholds. For normal-hearing subjects, an orderly function relating the percentage of audible stimulus to recognition performance was found, with perfect discrimination performance occurring when the bulk of the stimulus spectrum was presented at suprathreshold levels. For the hearing-impaired subjects, however, it was found in many instances that suprathreshold presentation of stop-consonant spectral cues did not yield recognition equivalent to that found for the normal-hearing subjects. These results demonstrate that while the audibility of individual stop consonants is an important factor influencing recognition performance in hearing-impaired subjects, it is not always sufficient to explain the effects of sensorineural hearing loss.     

Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss

A functional simulation of hearing loss was evaluated in its ability to reproduce the temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) for nine listeners with mild to profound sensorineural hearing loss. Each hearing loss was simulated in a group of three age-matched normal-hearing listeners through spectrally shaped masking noise or a combination of masking noise and multiband expansion. TMTFs were measured for both groups of listeners using a broadband noise carrier as a function of modulation rate in the range 2 to 1024 Hz. The TMTFs were fit with a lowpass filter function that provided estimates of overall modulation-depth sensitivity and modulation cutoff frequency. Although the simulations were capable of accurately reproducing the threshold elevations of the hearing-impaired listeners, they were not successful in reproducing the TMTFs. On average, the simulations resulted in lower sensitivity and higher cutoff frequency than were observed in the TMTFs of the hearing-impaired listeners. Discrepancies in performance between listeners with real and simulated hearing loss are possibly related to inaccuracies in the simulation of recruitment.     

Phoneme boundaries in normal and hearing-impaired ears

Two experiments are reported which explore variables that may complicate the interpretation of phoneme boundary data from hearing-impaired listeners. Fourteen synthetic consonant-vowel syllables comprising a/ba-da-ga/ continuum were used as stimuli. The first experiment examined the influence of presentation level and ear of presentation in normal-hearing subjects. Only small differences in the phoneme boundaries and labeling functions were observed between ears and across presentation levels. Thus monaural presentation and relatively high signal level do not appear to be complicating factors in research with hearing-impaired listeners, at least for these stimuli. The second experiment described a test procedure for obtaining phoneme boundaries in some hearing-impaired listeners that controlled for between-subject sources of variation unrelated to hearing impairment and delineated the effects of spectral shaping imposed by the hearing impairment on the labeling functions. Labeling data were obtained from unilaterally hearing-impaired listeners under three test conditions: in the normal ear without any signal distortion; in the normal ear listening through a spectrum shaper that was set to match the subject's suprathreshold audiometric configuration; and in the impaired ear. The reduction in the audibility of the distinctive acoustic/phonetic cues seemed to explain all or part of the effects of the hearing impairment on the labeling functions of some subjects. For many other subjects, however, other forms of distortion in addition to reduced audibility seemed to affect their labeling behavior.     

Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss

Temporal gap resolution was measured in five normal-hearing listeners and five cochlear-impaired listeners, whose sensitivity losses were restricted to the frequency regions above 1000 Hz. The stimuli included a broadband noise and three octave band noises centered at 0.5, 1.0, and 4.0 kHz. Results for the normal-hearing subjects agree with previous findings and reveal that gap resolution improves progressively with an increase in signal frequency. Gap resolution in the impaired listeners was significantly poorer than normal for all signals including those that stimulated frequency regions with normal pure-tone sensitivity. Smallest gap thresholds for the impaired listeners were observed with the broadband signal at high levels. This result agrees with data from other experiments and confirms the importance of high-frequency signal audibility in gap detection. The octave band data reveal that resolution deficits can be quite large within restricted frequency regions, even those with minimal sensitivity loss.