Prediction of speech intelligibility in spatial noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

Binaural speech intelligibility of individual listeners under realistic conditions was predicted using a model consisting of a gammatone filter bank, an independent equalization-cancellation (EC) process in each frequency band, a gammatone resynthesis, and the speech intelligibility index (SII). Hearing loss was simulated by adding uncorrelated masking noises (according to the pure-tone audiogram) to the ear channels. Speech intelligibility measurements were carried out with 8 normal-hearing and 15 hearing-impaired listeners, collecting speech reception threshold (SRT) data for three different room acoustic conditions (anechoic, office room, cafeteria hall) and eight directions of a single noise source (speech in front). Artificial EC processing errors derived from binaural masking level difference data using pure tones were incorporated into the model. Except for an adjustment of the SII-to-intelligibility mapping function, no model parameter was fitted to the SRT data of this study. The overall correlation coefficient between predicted and observed SRTs was 0.95. The dependence of the SRT of an individual listener on the noise direction and on room acoustics was predicted with a median correlation coefficient of 0.91. The effect of individual hearing impairment was predicted with a median correlation coefficient of 0.95. However, for mild hearing losses the release from masking was overestimated.     

Temporal and spectral masking release in low- and mid-frequency regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

"Masking release" (MR), the improvement of speech intelligibility in modulated compared with unmodulated maskers, is typically smaller than normal for hearing-impaired listeners. The extent to which this is due to reduced audibility or to suprathreshold processing deficits is unclear. Here, the effects of audibility were controlled by using stimuli restricted to the low- (≤1.5 kHz) or mid-frequency (1-3 kHz) region for normal-hearing listeners and hearing-impaired listeners with near-normal hearing in the tested region. Previous work suggests that the latter may have suprathreshold deficits. Both spectral and temporal MR were measured. Consonant identification was measured in quiet and in the presence of unmodulated, amplitude-modulated, and spectrally modulated noise at three signal-to-noise ratios (the same ratios for the two groups). For both frequency regions, consonant identification was poorer for the hearing-impaired than for the normal-hearing listeners in all conditions. The results suggest the presence of suprathreshold deficits for the hearing-impaired listeners, despite near-normal audiometric thresholds over the tested frequency regions. However, spectral MR and temporal MR were similar for the two groups. Thus, the suprathreshold deficits for the hearing-impaired group did not lead to reduced MR.     

Prediction of speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and cochlearly hearing-impaired listeners

The word recognition ability of 4 normal-hearing and 13 cochlearly hearing-impaired listeners was evaluated. Filtered and unfiltered speech in quiet and in noise were presented monaurally through headphones. The noise varied over listening situations with regard to spectrum, level, and temporal envelope. Articulation index theory was applied to predict the results. Two calculation methods were used, both based on the ANSI S3.5-1969 20-band method [S3.5-1969 (American National Standards Institute, New York)]. Method I was almost identical to the ANSI method. Method II included a level- and hearing-loss-dependent calculation of masking of stationary and on-off gated noise signals and of self-masking of speech. Method II provided the best prediction capability, and it is concluded that speech intelligibility of cochlearly hearing-impaired listeners may also, to a first approximation, be predicted from articulation index theory.     

Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

Noise and distortion reduce speech intelligibility and quality in audio devices such as hearing aids. This study investigates the perception and prediction of sound quality by both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects for conditions of noise and distortion related to those found in hearing aids. Stimuli were sentences subjected to three kinds of distortion (additive noise, peak clipping, and center clipping), with eight levels of degradation for each distortion type. The subjects performed paired comparisons for all possible pairs of 24 conditions. A one-dimensional coherence-based metric was used to analyze the quality judgments. This metric was an extension of a speech intelligibility metric presented in Kates and Arehart (2005) [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 2224-2237] and is based on dividing the speech signal into three amplitude regions, computing the coherence for each region, and then combining the three coherence values across frequency in a calculation based on the speech intelligibility index. The one-dimensional metric accurately predicted the quality judgments of normal-hearing listeners and listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss, although some systematic errors were present. A multidimensional analysis indicates that several dimensions are needed to describe the factors used by subjects to judge the effects of the three distortion types.     

Spectral integration of speech bands in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

This investigation examined whether listeners with mild-moderate sensorineural hearing impairment have a deficit in the ability to integrate synchronous spectral information in the perception of speech. In stage 1, the bandwidth of filtered speech centered either on 500 or 2500 Hz was varied adaptively to determine the width required for approximately 15%-25% correct recognition. In stage 2, these criterion bandwidths were presented simultaneously and percent correct performance was determined in fixed block trials. Experiment 1 tested normal-hearing listeners in quiet and in masking noise. The main findings were (1) there was no correlation between the criterion bandwidths at 500 and 2500 Hz; (2) listeners achieved a high percent correct in stage 2 (approximately 80%); and (3) performance in quiet and noise was similar. Experiment 2 tested listeners with mild-moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. The main findings were (1) the impaired listeners showed high variability in stage 1, with some listeners requiring narrower and others requiring wider bandwidths than normal, and (2) hearing-impaired listeners achieved percent correct performance in stage 2 that was comparable to normal. The results indicate that listeners with mild-moderate sensorineural hearing loss do not have an essential deficit in the ability to integrate across-frequency speech information.     

The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: steady-state noise

Speech-in-noise-measurements are important in clinical practice and have been the subject of research for a long time. The results of these measurements are often described in terms of the speech reception threshold (SRT) and SNR loss. Using the basic concepts that underlie several models of speech recognition in steady-state noise, the present study shows that these measures are ill-defined, most importantly because the slope of the speech recognition functions for hearing-impaired listeners always decreases with hearing loss. This slope can be determined from the slope of the normal-hearing speech recognition function when the SRT for the hearing-impaired listener is known. The SII-function (i.e., the speech intelligibility index (SII) against SNR) is important and provides insights into many potential pitfalls when interpreting SRT data. Standardized SNR loss, sSNR loss, is introduced as a universal measure of hearing loss for speech in steady-state noise. Experimental data demonstrates that, unlike the SRT or SNR loss, sSNR loss is invariant to the target point chosen, the scoring method or the type of speech material.     

Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners

The effect of head-induced interaural time delay (ITD) and interaural level differences (ILD) on binaural speech intelligibility in noise was studied for listeners with symmetrical and asymmetrical sensorineural hearing losses. The material, recorded with a KEMAR manikin in an anechoic room, consisted of speech, presented from the front (0 degree), and noise, presented at azimuths of 0 degree, 30 degrees, and 90 degrees. Derived noise signals, containing either only ITD or only ILD, were generated using a computer. For both groups of subjects, speech-reception thresholds (SRT) for sentences in noise were determined as a function of: (1) noise azimuth, (2) binaural cue, and (3) an interaural difference in overall presentation level, simulating the effect of a monaural hearing acid. Comparison of the mean results with corresponding data obtained previously from normal-hearing listeners shows that the hearing impaired have a 2.5 dB higher SRT in noise when both speech and noise are presented from the front, and 2.6-5.1 dB less binaural gain when the noise azimuth is changed from 0 degree to 90 degrees. The gain due to ILD varies among the hearing-impaired listeners between 0 dB and normal values of 7 dB or more. It depends on the high-frequency hearing loss at the side presented with the most favorable signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio. The gain due to ITD is nearly normal for the symmetrically impaired (4.2 dB, compared with 4.7 dB for the normal hearing), but only 2.5 dB in the case of asymmetrical impairment. When ITD is introduced in noise already containing ILD, the resulting gain is 2-2.5 dB for all groups. The only marked effect of the interaural difference in overall presentation level is a reduction of the gain due to ILD when the level at the ear with the better S/N ratio is decreased. This implies that an optimal monaural hearing aid (with a moderate gain) will hardly interfere with unmasking through ITD, while it may increase the gain due to ILD by preventing or diminishing threshold effects.     

Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

Several studies have demonstrated that when talkers are instructed to speak clearly, the resulting speech is significantly more intelligible than speech produced in ordinary conversation. These speech intelligibility improvements are accompanied by a wide variety of acoustic changes. The current study explored the relationship between acoustic properties of vowels and their identification in clear and conversational speech, for young normal-hearing (YNH) and elderly hearing-impaired (EHI) listeners. Monosyllabic words excised from sentences spoken either clearly or conversationally by a male talker were presented in 12-talker babble for vowel identification. While vowel intelligibility was significantly higher in clear speech than in conversational speech for the YNH listeners, no clear speech advantage was found for the EHI group. Regression analyses were used to assess the relative importance of spectral target, dynamic formant movement, and duration information for perception of individual vowels. For both listener groups, all three types of information emerged as primary cues to vowel identity. However, the relative importance of the three cues for individual vowels differed greatly for the YNH and EHI listeners. This suggests that hearing loss alters the way acoustic cues are used for identifying vowels.     

Sentence recognition in noise promoting or suppressing masking release by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners

Normal-hearing (NH) listeners maintain robust speech understanding in modulated noise by "glimpsing" portions of speech from a partially masked waveform--a phenomenon known as masking release (MR). Cochlear implant (CI) users, however, generally lack such resiliency. In previous studies, temporal masking of speech by noise occurred randomly, obscuring to what degree MR is attributable to the temporal overlap of speech and masker. In the present study, masker conditions were constructed to either promote (+MR) or suppress (-MR) masking release by controlling the degree of temporal overlap. Sentence recognition was measured in 14 CI subjects and 22 young-adult NH subjects. Normal-hearing subjects showed large amounts of masking release in the +MR condition and a marked difference between +MR and -MR conditions. In contrast, CI subjects demonstrated less effect of MR overall, and some displayed modulation interference as reflected by poorer performance in modulated maskers. These results suggest that the poor performance of typical CI users in noise might be accounted for by factors that extend beyond peripheral masking, such as reduced segmental boundaries between syllables or words. Encouragingly, the best CI users tested here could take advantage of masker fluctuations to better segregate the speech from the background.     

Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners

Many competing noises in real environments are modulated or fluctuating in level. Listeners with normal hearing are able to take advantage of temporal gaps in fluctuating maskers. Listeners with sensorineural hearing loss show less benefit from modulated maskers. Cochlear implant users may be more adversely affected by modulated maskers because of their limited spectral resolution and by their reliance on envelope-based signal-processing strategies of implant processors. The current study evaluated cochlear implant users' ability to understand sentences in the presence of modulated speech-shaped noise. Normal-hearing listeners served as a comparison group. Listeners repeated IEEE sentences in quiet, steady noise, and modulated noise maskers. Maskers were presented at varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at six modulation rates varying from 1 to 32 Hz. Results suggested that normal-hearing listeners obtain significant release from masking from modulated maskers, especially at 8-Hz masker modulation frequency. In contrast, cochlear implant users experience very little release from masking from modulated maskers. The data suggest, in fact, that they may show negative effects of modulated maskers at syllabic modulation rates (2-4 Hz). Similar patterns of results were obtained from implant listeners using three different devices with different speech-processor strategies. The lack of release from masking occurs in implant listeners independent of their device characteristics, and may be attributable to the nature of implant processing strategies and/or the lack of spectral detail in processed stimuli.     

Spectral shape discrimination by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners

The ability to discriminate between sounds with different spectral shapes was evaluated for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Listeners discriminated between a standard stimulus and a signal stimulus in which half of the standard components were decreased in level and half were increased in level. In one condition, the standard stimulus was the sum of six equal-amplitude tones (equal-SPL), and in another the standard stimulus was the sum of six tones at equal sensation levels re: audiometric thresholds for individual subjects (equal-SL). Spectral weights were estimated in conditions where the amplitudes of the individual tones were perturbed slightly on every presentation. Sensitivity was similar in all conditions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The presence of perturbation and equal-SL components increased thresholds for both groups, but only small differences in weighting strategy were measured between the groups depending on whether the equal-SPL or equal-SL condition was tested. The average data suggest that normal-hearing listeners may rely more on the central components of the spectrum whereas hearing-impaired listeners may have been more likely to use the edges. However, individual weighting functions were quite variable, especially for the HI listeners, perhaps reflecting difficulty in processing changes in spectral shape due to hearing loss. Differences in weighting strategy without changes in sensitivity suggest that factors other than spectral weights, such as internal noise or difficulty encoding a reference stimulus, also may dominate performance.     

Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners

The goal of this study was to measure the ability of adult hearing-impaired listeners to discriminate formant frequency for vowels in isolation, syllables, and sentences. Vowel formant discrimination for F1 and F2 for the vowels /I epsilon ae / was measured. Four experimental factors were manipulated including linguistic context (isolated vowels, syllables, and sentences), signal level (70 and 95 dB SPL), formant frequency, and cognitive load. A complex identification task was added to the formant discrimination task only for sentences to assess effects of cognitive load. Results showed significant elevation in formant thresholds as formant frequency and linguistic context increased. Higher signal level also elevated formant thresholds primarily for F2. However, no effect of the additional identification task on the formant discrimination was observed. In comparable conditions, these hearing-impaired listeners had elevated thresholds for formant discrimination compared to young normal-hearing listeners primarily for F2. Altogether, poorer performance for formant discrimination for these adult hearing-impaired listeners was mainly caused by hearing loss rather than cognitive difficulty for tasks implemented in this study.     

母语为汉语的听者听英语时的空间去掩蔽现象研究

通过心理声学实验研究了来自不同方向具有不同信噪比的两种干扰声条件下,母语为汉语的听者对英语的空间去掩蔽现象。在消声室指定位置布放扬声器,发出目标声和干扰声,通过听者对目标声进行听音识别,得到听者识别的正确率。实验结果显示:只在正前方播放目标语音时,识别正确率大于99%,当目标和干扰语音都位于听者正前方时,正确率为57%;当目标和干扰语音随机位于士60°时,正确率为96%;特别地,当目标语音和干扰信号都位于听者正前方时,若干扰为噪声,随着信噪比从0 dB降低到-12 dB,正确率从96%降低到34%,而当干扰为语音时,随着信噪比从0 dB降低到-12 dB,正确率先是下降,随后有平均幅度为27%的明显上升,在此之后又是下降的趋势;当噪声干扰和语音干扰位于60°时,随着信噪比从-4 dB降低到-16 dB,正确率分别从99%降低到80%和从98%降低到91%。研究表明:空间分离对于母语为汉语的听者的英语语音可懂度有明显增益;大多数情况下英语语音的正确率都随着信噪比的降低而下降。这和对母语为其他语言的相关研究结论一致。     

Tone detection and synthetic speech discrimination in band-reject noise by hearing-impaired listeners

Frequency resolution was evaluated for two normal-hearing and seven hearing-impaired subjects with moderate, flat sensorineural hearing loss by measuring percent correct detection of a 2000-Hz tone as the width of a notch in band-reject noise increased. The level of the tone was fixed for each subject at a criterion performance level in broadband noise. Discrimination of synthetic speech syllables that differed in spectral content in the 2000-Hz region was evaluated as a function of the notch width in the same band-reject noise. Recognition of natural speech consonant/vowel syllables in quiet was also tested; results were analyzed for percent correct performance and relative information transmitted for voicing and place features. In the hearing-impaired subjects, frequency resolution at 2000 Hz was significantly correlated with the discrimination of synthetic speech information in the 2000-Hz region and was not related to the recognition of natural speech nonsense syllables unless (a) the speech stimuli contained the vowel /i/ rather than /a/, and (b) the score reflected information transmitted for place of articulation rather than percent correct.     

Sample discrimination of frequency by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners

In a multiple observation, sample discrimination experiment normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners heard two multitone complexes each consisting of six simultaneous tones with nominal frequencies spaced evenly on an ERB(N) logarithmic scale between 257 and 6930 Hz. On every trial, the frequency of each tone was sampled from a normal distribution centered near its nominal frequency. In one interval of a 2IFC task, all tones were sampled from distributions lower in mean frequency and in the other interval from distributions higher in mean frequency. Listeners had to identify the latter interval. Decision weights were obtained from multiple regression analysis of the between- interval frequency differences for each tone and listeners' responses. Frequency difference limens (an index of sensorineural resolution) and decision weights for each tone were used to predict the sensitivity of different decision-theoretic models. Results indicate that low-frequency tones were given much greater perceptual weight than high-frequency tones by both groups of listeners. This tendency increased as hearing loss increased and as sensorineural resolution decreased, resulting in significantly less efficient weighting strategies for the HI listeners. Overall, results indicate that HI listeners integrated frequency information less optimally than NH listeners, even after accounting for differences in sensorineural resolution.     

Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects

Subjects with cochlear impairments often show reduced temporal resolution as measured in gap-detection tasks. The primary goals of these experiments were: to assess the extent to which the enlarged gap thresholds can be explained by elevations in absolute threshold; and to determine whether the large gap thresholds can be explained by the same processes that lead to a slower-than-normal recovery from forward masking. In experiment I gap thresholds were measured for nine unilaterally and eight bilaterally impaired subjects, using bandlimited noise stimuli centered at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz. Gap thresholds were usually larger for the impaired ears, even when the comparisons were made at equal sensation levels (SLs). Gap thresholds tended to increase with increasing absolute threshold, but the scatter of gap thresholds was large for a given degree of hearing loss. In experiment II threshold was measured as a function of the delay between the onset of a 210-ms masker and the onset of a 10-ms signal in both simultaneous- and forward-masking conditions. The signal frequency was equal to the center frequency of the bandlimited noise masker, which was 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 kHz. Five subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments, two subjects with bilateral impairments, and two normal subjects were tested. The rate of recovery from forward masking, particularly the initial rate, was usually slower for the impaired ears, even when the maskers were presented at equal SLs. Large gap thresholds tended to be associated with slow rates of recovery from forward masking.     

Spectral-peak selection in spectral-shape discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

Spectral-shape discrimination thresholds were measured in the presence and absence of noise to determine whether normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners rely primarily on spectral peaks in the excitation pattern when discriminating between stimuli with different spectral shapes. Standard stimuli were the sum of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, or 30 equal-amplitude tones with frequencies fixed between 200 and 4000 Hz. Signal stimuli were generated by increasing and decreasing the levels of every other standard component. The function relating the spectral-shape discrimination threshold to the number of components (N) showed an initial decrease in threshold with increasing N and then an increase in threshold when the number of components reached 10 and 6, for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners, respectively. The presence of a 50-dB SPL/Hz noise led to a 1.7 dB increase in threshold for normal-hearing listeners and a 3.5 dB increase for hearing-impaired listeners. Multichannel modeling and the relatively small influence of noise suggest that both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners rely on the peaks in the excitation pattern for spectral-shape discrimination. The greater influence of noise in the data from hearing-impaired listeners is attributed to a poorer representation of spectral peaks.     

Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

To determine the minimum difference in amplitude between spectral peaks and troughs sufficient for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners, four vowel-like complex sounds were created by summing the first 30 harmonics of a 100-Hz tone. The amplitudes of all harmonics were equal, except for two consecutive harmonics located at each of three "formant" locations. The amplitudes of these harmonics were equal and ranged from 1-8 dB more than the remaining components. Normal-hearing listeners achieved greater than 75% accuracy when peak-to-trough differences were 1-2 dB. Normal-hearing listeners who were tested in a noise background sufficient to raise their thresholds to the level of a flat, moderate hearing loss needed a 4-dB difference for identification. Listeners with a moderate, flat hearing loss required a 6- to 7-dB difference for identification. The results suggest, for normal-hearing listeners, that the peak-to-trough amplitude difference required for identification of this set of vowels is very near the threshold for detection of a change in the amplitude spectrum of a complex signal. Hearing-impaired listeners may have difficulty using closely spaced formants for vowel identification due to abnormal smoothing of the internal representation of the spectrum by broadened auditory filters.     

Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners

The present study evaluated auditory-visual speech perception in cochlear-implant users as well as normal-hearing and simulated-implant controls to delineate relative contributions of sensory experience and cues. Auditory-only, visual-only, or auditory-visual speech perception was examined in the context of categorical perception, in which an animated face mouthing ba, da, or ga was paired with synthesized phonemes from an 11-token auditory continuum. A three-alternative, forced-choice method was used to yield percent identification scores. Normal-hearing listeners showed sharp phoneme boundaries and strong reliance on the auditory cue, whereas actual and simulated implant listeners showed much weaker categorical perception but stronger dependence on the visual cue. The implant users were able to integrate both congruent and incongruent acoustic and optical cues to derive relatively weak but significant auditory-visual integration. This auditory-visual integration was correlated with the duration of the implant experience but not the duration of deafness. Compared with the actual implant performance, acoustic simulations of the cochlear implant could predict the auditory-only performance but not the auditory-visual integration. These results suggest that both altered sensory experience and improvised acoustic cues contribute to the auditory-visual speech perception in cochlear-implant users.     

Sound localization in noise in normal-hearing listeners

The ability to localize a click train in the frontal-horizontal plane was measured in quiet and in the presence of a white-noise masker. The experiment tested the effects of signal frequency, signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), and masker location. Clicks were low-pass filtered at 11 kHz in the broadband condition, low-pass filtered at 1.6 kHz in the low-pass condition, and bandpass filtered between 1.6 and 11 kHz in the high-pass condition. The masker was presented at either -90, 0, or +90 deg azimuth. Six signal-to-noise ratios were used, ranging from -9 to +18 dB. Results obtained with four normal-hearing listeners show that (1) for all masker locations and filtering conditions, localization accuracy remains unaffected by noise until 0-6 dB S/N and decreases at more adverse signal-to-noise ratios, (2) for all filtering conditions and at low signal-to-noise ratios, the effect of noise is greater when noise is presented at +/- 90 deg azimuth than at 0 deg azimuth, (3) the effect of noise is similar for all filtering conditions when noise is presented at 0 deg azimuth, and (4) when noise is presented at +/- 90 deg azimuth, the effect of noise is similar for the broadband and high-pass conditions, but greater for the low-pass condition. These results suggest that the low- and high-frequency cues used to localize sounds are equally affected when noise is presented at 0 deg azimuth. However, low-frequency cues are less resistant to noise than high-frequency cues when noise is presented at +/- 90 deg azimuth. When both low- and high-frequency cues are available, listeners base their decision on the cues providing the most accurate estimation of the direction of the sound source (high-frequency cues). Parallel measures of click detectability suggest that the poorer localization accuracy observed when noise is at +/- 90 deg azimuth may be caused by a reduction in the detectability of the signal at the ear ipsilateral to the noise.