1‐Benzyl‐3,3‐dichloro‐1H‐indol‐2(3H)‐one

The title compound, C₁₅H₁₁Cl₂NO, was synthesized from N‐­benzyl­isatin. The compound crystallizes as stacks of mol­ecules running down the c axis. Mol­ecules within each of these stacks inter­act with each other through π–π and C—H⋯π inter­actions, and inter­act with neighbouring stacks through C—H⋯O inter­actions.     

2,3,4,5,6‐Penta­nitro­aniline 1,2‐dichloro­ethane disolvate: `push–pull' deformation of aromatic rings by intra­molecular charge transfer

The title compound, C₆H₂N₆O₁₀·2C₂H₄Cl₂, forms layered stacks of penta­nitro­aniline mol­ecules, which possess twofold symmetry. The voids between these stacks are occupied by dichloro­ethane mol­ecules, which reside near a 2/m symmetry element and display pseudo‐inversion symmetry. The C atoms in one of the two solvent mol­ecules are threefold disordered. In the penta­nitro­aniline mol­ecule, considerable distortion of the benzenoid ring, coupled with the short C—N(H₂) bond and out‐of‐plane NO₂ twistings, point to significant intra­molecular `push–pull' charge transfer at the amino‐ and nitro‐substituted (ortho and para) positions, as theoretically quantified by natural bond orbital analysis of the π‐electron density.     

fac‐Bromo­tri­carbonyl­[2‐(2‐pyridylmethyl)‐2,3‐di­hydro‐1H‐isoindol‐1‐one]­rhenium(I) methanol solvate

The structure of the title compound, fac‐[ReBr(C₁₄H₁₂N₂O)(CO)₃]·CH₄O, consists of neutral mononuclear mol­ecular units of distorted octahedral geometry, with the three carbonyl donors in a facial orientation. The remaining coordination sites are occupied by the Br atom, the pyridine N atom and the ketone O‐atom donor of the ligand. The mol­ecules pack in stacks of antiparallel tapes, with a network of classical (O—H⋯Br) and non‐classical (C—H⋯O) hydrogen bonds between the methanol solvent mol­ecule and the complex mol­ecule.     

1,2,4,5‐Tetrakis(2‐vinyl­pyridyl)­benzene–di­chloro­methane (1/2)

The title compound, C₃₄H₂₆N₄·2CH₂Cl₂, lies about an inversion center. The solvent mol­ecules interact with the benzene mol­ecule both through C—H⃛N hydrogen bonding to span pyridine N atoms of adjacent vinyl groups, possibly stabilizing the rotational conformation observed, and through a π interaction between a dichloromethane Cl atom and a pyridyl ring C—C bond of a c‐glide‐related mol­ecule. The benzene mol­ecules form stacks along the a axis such that two of the four olefin groups are properly oriented for photoreactivity (2+2 cyclo­dimerization).     

1,2,3‐Trimethoxy‐5,11‐dihydro­indolo[1,2‐b]isoquinoline‐5,11‐dione

The title compound, C₁₅H₁₉NO₅, crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with four mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, which differ from each other in the orientation of their methoxy groups. Of the three methoxy groups in each molecule, one lies close to the plane of the mol­ecule and the other two have an out‐of‐plane conformation where they point in opposite directions. In the crystal structure, four different types of π‐stacks are observed and the mol­ecules pack in two different types of stacking sheets, with alternating mol­ecules A and B in one ribbon and alternating mol­ecules C and D in the other. The supramolecular structure is supported by C—H⋯O and π–π inter­actions.     

1,3,5,7‐Tetraselena‐2,4,6,8(2,5)‐tetrathiophenaoctaphane

The novel title tetraselenacalix[4]arene, C₁₆H₈S₄Se₄ or [(C₄H₂S)Se]₄, has a centrosymmetric cyclic molecular structure with approximate C_2h molecular symmetry. The four thienyl rings are joined together by Se bridges and exhibit a syn–syn–anti–anti arrangement around the mol­ecule. The lattice consists of skewed stacks of mol­ecules, with chalcogen–chalcogen close contacts binding the stacks together, forming a two‐dimensional network of mol­ecules.     

The binary adduct of 3,6,9,16,19,22‐hexaazatricyclo[22.2.2.211,14]triaconta‐11,13,24,26(1),27,29‐hexaene and benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylic acid

The crystals of the title salt, 6,21‐di­aza‐3,9,18,24‐tetraazoniatri­cyclo­[22.2.2.2^11,14]­triaconta‐11,13,24,26(1),27,29‐hexaene benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetra­carboxyl­ate(4?) hexahydrate, C₂₄H₄₂N₆⁴⁺·C₁₀H₂O₈^4?·6H₂O, are formed by the intermolecular interaction of a macrocyclic hex­amine with a mol­ecule of C₆H₂(COOH)₄ in aqueous solution. Both the cation and the anion are on inversion centres. Hydro­gen bonds are formed between the four ammonium cations in the hex­amine and the four carboxyl­ate anions in the aromatic acid. Stacks exist along the crystallographic a axis in the solid state. The water mol­ecules also take part in a hydrogen‐bonding network which joins these stacks together.     

2‐Amino derivatives of 5‐nitro­phenyl­acet­amide

The structures of the potential non‐linear optical (NLO) materials N‐[2‐(iso­propyl­amino)‐5‐nitro­phenyl]­acet­amide, (I) C₁₁H₁₅N₃O₃, and N‐[2‐(butyl­amino)‐5‐nitro­phenyl]­acet­amide, (II) C₁₂H₁₇N₃O₃, have been investigated by X‐ray analysis. To compare them with the structure of N‐[2‐(di­methyl­amino)‐5‐nitro­phenyl]­acet­amide, (III) C₁₀H₁₃N₃O₃, a known NLO compound, we had to redetermine the structure of (III), since it was described only briefly in the literature. There are two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit of compound (I), which have different orientations of the substituents with respect to the benzene ring. The packing of mol­ecules in (II) and (III) contains stacks but both (I) and (II) crystallize in a centrosymmetric space group, which renders them inappropriate for NLO applications.     

A series of three bis­[2‐(methyl/tri­fluoro­methyl)‐4H‐3,1‐benzoxazin‐4‐one] compounds

Each of the three title compounds, namely 6,6′‐methyl­ene­bis­(2‐methyl‐4H‐3,1‐benz­oxazin‐4‐one), C₁₉H₁₄N₂O₄, 6,6′‐methyl­ene­bis­(2‐tri­fluoro­methyl‐4H‐3,1‐benz­oxazin‐4‐one), C₁₉H₈F₃N₂O₄, and 6,6′‐bi­(2‐tri­fluoro­methyl‐4H‐3,1‐benz­oxazin‐4‐one), C₁₈H₆F₆N₂O₄, contains two planar benz­ox­azin­one fragments. In the first two compounds, these planes are virtually perpendicular to each other, while the third compound is planar overall. The electronic effects of the substituent groups on the oxazine moiety result in distortion of the bond angles at the C atoms of the C=O and C=N bonds, and in redistribution of electronic density in the oxazine rings. The latter leads to different bond lengths within this ring in the three mol­ecules. All the mol­ecules form stacks in their crystals with distances of 3.2–3.6 Å between adjacent mol­ecules in a stack.     

2‐(3‐Pyridyl)‐1,3,8‐tri­aza­naphthalene,a product of the catalytic transformation of 3‐cyano­pyridine

The title compound, C₁₂H₈N₄, was obtained by thermal treatment of 3‐cyano­pyridine in the presence of magnesium phthalocyanine as catalyst. The X‐ray structure analysis, in direct contrast to molecular orbital calculations corresponding to the gas phase, shows the mol­ecule to be non‐planar in the solid state, with an interplanar angle between the pyridine and 1,3,8‐tri­aza­naphthalene rings of 13.33 (9)°. Mol­ecules related to one another by cell translation, and positioned at intervals consistent with π–π intermolecular interactions, form stacks in the b direction.     

(±)‐6‐Benzyl‐3,3‐di­methyl­morpholine‐2,5‐dione and its 5‐mono­thio and 2,5‐di­thio derivatives

The morpholine ring of the title dione, C₁₃H₁₅NO₃, shows a boat conformation that is distorted towards a twist‐boat, with the boat ends being the two Csp³ atoms of the ring. The benzyl substituent is in the favoured `exo' position. In the mono­thione derivative, (±)‐6‐benzyl‐3,3‐di­methyl‐5‐thioxo­morpholin‐2‐one, C<sub>13</sub>H<sub>15</sub>NO<sub>2</sub>S, this ring has a much flatter conformation that is midway between a boat and an envelope, with the di­methyl end being almost planar. The orientation of the benzyl group is `endo'. The di­thione derivative, (±)‐6‐benzyl‐3,3‐di­methyl­morpholine‐2,5‐di­thione, C₁₃H₁₅N­OS₂, has two symmetry‐independent mol­ecules, which show different puckering of the morpholine ring. One mol­ecule has a flattened envelope conformation distorted towards a screw‐boat, while the conformation in the other mol­ecule is similar to that in the mono­thione derivative. Intermolecular hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules in the three compounds, respectively, into centrosymmetric dimers, infinite chains, and dimers made up of one of each of the symmetry‐independent mol­ecules.     

Supramolecular hydrogen‐bonded hexamers in two 5‐aryl‐3‐methyl‐1‐phenyl‐1,6,7,8‐tetra­hydro­pyrazolo­[3,4‐b][1,4]­diazepines

In both title compounds, i.e. 3‐methyl‐1,5‐di­phenyl‐1,6,7,8‐tetra­hydro­pyrazolo­[3,4‐b][1,4]­diazepine, C₁₉H₁₈N₄, (I), and 5‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)‐3‐methyl‐1‐phenyl‐1,6,7,8‐tetra­hydro­pyra­zolo­[3,4‐b][1,4]­diazepine, C₁₉H₁₇ClN₄, (II), an N—H?N hydrogen bond links six mol­ecules to form an R(30) ring. Compound (I) crystallizes in the R space group and (II) crystallizes in P with three mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. The mol­ecule of (I) contains a disordered seven‐membered ring.     

[2,6‐Bis(1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl‐κN3)­pyridine‐κN](di­methyl­form­amide‐κO)­(thio­sulfato‐κ2O,S)­nickel(II) mono­hydrate

The structure of the title compound, [Ni(ths)(bbip)(dmf)]·­H₂O [ths is thio­sulfate, S₂O₃; bbip is 2,6‐bis(1H‐benz­imidazol‐2‐yl)­pyridine, C₂₁H₁₃N₅; and dmf is di­methyl­form­amide, C₃H₇NO], is monomeric, with the nickel ion octahe­drally surrounded by an N,N′,N′′‐tridentate bbip mol­ecule, an S,O‐bidentate ths mol­ecule and an O‐monodentate dmf mol­ecule. The H atoms of the hydration water mol­ecule and the amino groups of bbip are involved in hydrogen bonding and determine a spatial organization of broad layers parallel to (001), which are connected by weak interactions.     

Proton‐transfer and non‐transfer in compounds of quinoline and quinaldic acid with l‐tartaric acid

The structures of two compounds of l ‐tartaric acid with quinoline, viz. the proton‐transfer compound quinolinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate monohydrate, C₉H₈N⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻·H₂O, (I), and the anhydrous non‐proton‐transfer adduct with quinaldic acid, bis­(quinolinium‐2‐carboxyl­ate) (2R,3R)‐tar­taric acid, 2C₁₀H₇NO₂·C₄H₆O₆, (II), have been determined at 130 K. Compound (I) has a three‐dimensional honeycomb substructure formed from head‐to‐tail hydrogen‐bonded hydrogen tartrate anions and water mol­ecules. The stacks of π‐bonded quinolinium cations are accommodated within the channels and are hydrogen bonded to it peripherally. Compound (II) has a two‐dimensional network structure based on pseudo‐centrosymmetric head‐to‐tail hydrogen‐bonded cyclic dimers comprising zwitterionic quinaldic acid species which are inter­linked by tartaric acid mol­ecules.     

Bis­(melaminium) dl‐malate tetrahydrate

The crystal structure of the title melaminium salt, bis(2,4,6‐tri­amino‐1,3,5‐triazin‐1‐ium) dl ‐malate tetrahydrate, 2C₃H₇N₆⁺·C₄H₄O₅²⁻·4H₂O, consists of singly protonated melaminium residues, dl ‐malate dianions and water mol­ecules. The melaminium residues are connected into chains by four N—H⃛N hydrogen bonds, and these chains form a stacking structure along the c axis. The dl ‐malate dianions form hydrogen‐bonded chains and, together with hydrogen‐bonded water mol­ecules, form a layer parallel to the (100) plane. The conformation of the malate ion is compared with an ab initio molecular‐orbital calculation. The oppositely charged moieties, i.e. the stacks of melaminium chains and hydrogen‐bonded dl ‐malate anions and water mol­ecules, form a three‐dimensional polymeric structure, in which N—H⃛O hydrogen bonds stabilize the stacking.     

The effect of molecular planarity on crystal non‐centrosymmetry in benzyl­idene–aniline derivatives

In the title compound, N‐(2‐methoxy­phenyl)‐4‐nitro­benzyli­deneamine, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₃, the two phenyl rings make a dihedral angle of 48.0 (2)° and the nitro group is at an angle of 6.5 (1)° with respect to its attached phenyl ring. In the crystal structure, mol­ecules are related as centrosymmetric pairs through π–π interactions and are further connected through strong C—H?O hydrogen bonds [C?O 3.4259 (17) Å and C—H?O 167°], forming molecular stacks along [100]. These stacks associate further through longer C—H?O interactions, forming two‐dimensional networks. In the c direction, there are only weak van der Waals interactions. The relationship between the molecular planarity and its centrosymmetry is also briefly described.     

A new estra‐1,3,5(10)‐triene‐3,17β‐diol solvate: estradiol–methanol–water (3/2/1)

The title solvate of the steroid 17β‐estradiol (E₂) with methanol and water, C₁₈H₂₄O₂·0.67CH₄O·0.33H₂O, is the first E₂ derivative to contain three crystallographically independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. The three steroid mol­ecules, along with two methanol mol­ecules and a water mol­ecule, create a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded system. Three‐sided columns are formed, with the estradiol mol­ecules aligned lengthwise parallel to (101), and joined by solvent mol­ecules at both hydro­philic ends. The three estradiol mol­ecules differ slightly in their ring‐bowing angles, i.e. the angle between the mean plane of the A ring and that of the BCD ring; this angle ranges from 7.1 to 12.2°.     

4‐Chloro­aceto­phenone [1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)­ethyl­idene]­hydra­zone

The crystal structure of the title mixed azine, C₁₇H₁₇ClN₂O, contains four independent mol­ecules, A–D, and mol­ecule B is disordered. All four mol­ecules have an N—N gauche conformation, with C—N—N—C torsion angles of 136.5 (4), 137.0 (4), ?134.7 (4) and ?134.7 (4)°, respectively. The phenyl rings are also somewhat twisted with respect to the plane defined by C_ipso and the imine bond. On average, the combined effect of these twists results in an angle of 64.7° between the best planes of the two phenyl rings. Arene–arene double T‐contacts are the dominant intermolecular inter­action. The methoxy‐substituted phenyl ring of one azine mol­ecule interacts to form a T‐contact with the methoxy‐substituted phenyl ring of an adjacent mol­ecule and, similarly, two chloro‐substituted phenyl rings of neighboring mol­ecules interact to form another T‐contact. The only exception is for mol­ecule B, for which the disorder leads to the formation of T‐­contacts between methoxy‐ and chloro‐substituted phenyl rings. The prevailing structural motif of T‐contact formation between like‐substituted arene rings results in a highly dipole‐parallel‐aligned crystal structure.     

(E)‐(4‐Hydroxyphenyl)(4‐nitrophenyl)diazene, (E)‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)(4‐nitrophenyl)diazene and (E)‐[4‐(6‐bromohexyloxy)phenyl](4‐cyanophenyl)diazene

Syntheses and X‐ray structural investigations have been carried out for (E)‐(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)(4‐nitro­phenyl)­diazene, C₁₂H₉N₃O₃, (Ia), (E)‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)(4‐nitro­phenyl)­diazene, C₁₃H₁₁N₃O₃, (IIIa), and (E)‐[4‐(6‐bromo­hexyl­oxy)­phenyl](4‐cyano­phenyl)­diazene, C₁₉H₂₀BrN₃O, (IIIc). In all of these compounds, the mol­ecules are almost planar and the azo­benzene core has a trans geometry. Compound (Ia) contains four and compound (IIIc) contains two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, both in space group P (No. 2). In compound (Ia), the independent mol­ecules are almost identical, whereas in crystal (IIIc), the two independent mol­ecules differ significantly due to different conformations of the alkyl tails. In the crystals of (Ia) and (IIIa), the mol­ecules are arranged in almost planar sheets. In the crystal of (IIIc), the mol­ecules are packed with a marked separation of the azo­benzene cores and alkyl tails, which is common for the solid crystalline precursors of mesogens.     

N‐(3H‐Thia­zol‐2‐yl­idene)­nitr­amine and N‐methyl‐N‐(thia­zol‐2‐yl)­nitr­amine

The geometries of the thia­zole ring and the nitr­amino groups in N‐(3H‐thia­zol‐2‐yl­idene)­nitr­amine, C₃H₃N₃O₂S, (I), and N‐­methyl‐N‐(thia­zol‐2‐yl)­nitr­amine, C₄H₅N₃O₂S, (II), are very similar. The nitr­amine group in (II) is planar and twisted along the C—N bond with respect to the thia­zole ring. In both structures, the asymmetric unit includes two practically equal mol­ecules. In (I), the mol­ecules are arranged in layers connected to each other by N—H⋯N and much weaker C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. In the crystal structure of (II), the mol­ecules are arranged in layers bound to each other by both weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and S⋯O dipolar interactions.