Structural analysis of pyrrolidinones

In the course of a study on pyrrolidinones, the crystal structures of four compounds, namely, methyl N‐[(4‐meth­oxy­phenyl)(3,4,5‐tri­meth­oxy­phenyl)­methyl]­pyro­glut­amate, C₂₃­H₂₇­NO₇, methyl N‐[naphthyl‐(3,4,5‐tri­meth­oxy­phenyl)­methyl]­pyro­glut­amate diacetyl peroxide, C₂₆­H₂₇­NO₆·‐0.5C₄H₆O₄, 5‐(3,4,5‐tri­meth­oxy­phenyl)‐1,2,3,11b‐tetrahy­dro‐5H‐naphtho­[1,8‐f,g]indol­izin‐3‐one, C₂₄­H₂₃­NO₄, and 5‐(3,4,5‐tri­meth­oxy­phenyl)‐1,2,3,5,12,12a‐hexa­hydro­naph­tho­[1,2‐f]indol­izine‐3,12‐dione, C₂₅­H₂₃­NO₅, are presented, compared and discussed.     

Linear chains in polymeric di­cyclo­hexyl­ammonium tri­butyl­(4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐2,6‐di­carboxyl­ato)­stannate and methyl­phenyl­ammonium tri­butyl(pyridine‐2,6‐di­carboxyl­ato)­stannate containing trigonal bipyramidal tin

catena‐Poly­[di­cyclo­hexyl­ammonium [tri­butyl­tin‐μ‐(4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐2,6‐di­carboxyl­ato‐O²:O⁶)]], (C₁₂­H₂₄N)­[Sn(C₇­H₂­O₆)(C₄H₉)₃], consists of 4‐oxo‐4H‐pyran‐2,6‐di­carboxyl­ato groups that axially link adjacent tri­butyl­tin units into a linear polyanionic chain. The ammonium counter‐ions surround the chain, and each cation forms a pair of hydrogen bonds to the double‐bond carbonyl O atoms of the same dianionic group. The chain propagates in a zigzag manner along the c axis of the monoclinic cell. In catena‐poly­[methyl­(phenyl)­ammonium [tri­butyl­tin‐μ‐(pyridine‐2,6‐di­carboxyl­ato‐O²:O⁶)]], (C₇H₁₀N)­[Sn(C₇H₃NO₄)­(C₄H₉)₃], the pyridine‐2,6‐di­carboxyl­ato groups also link the tri­butyl­tin groups into a chain, but the hydrogen‐bonded chain propagates linearly on the ac face of the monoclinic cell.     

Intermolecular stacking in pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine‐based pentamethylene‐linked flexible ­molecules

The crystal structures of 1‐{5‐[4,6‐bis­(methyl­sulfanyl)‐2H‐py­razolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidin‐2‐yl]­pentyl}‐6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐4‐(pyr­rolidin‐1‐yl)‐1H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine, C₂₂H₂₉N₉S₃, and 6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐1‐{5‐[6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐4‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐2H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidin‐2‐yl]­pentyl}‐4‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐1H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine, C₂₅H₃₄N₁₀S₂, which differ in having either a pyrrolidine substituent or a methylsulfanyl group, show intermolecular stacking due to aromatic π–π interactions between the pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine rings.     

Diels–Alder adducts of maleic ­anhydride and dienes: new compounds by crystallization

We have determined the crystal structures of bi­cyclo­[2.2.1]­hept‐2‐ene‐endo‐cis‐5,6‐di­carboxyl­ic anhydride, C₉H₈O₃, (I), 1,2,3,4,7,7‐hexa­chloro­bi­cyclo­[2.2.1]­hept‐2‐ene‐endo‐cis‐5,6‐di­carboxyl­ic anhydride diethyl ether solvate, C₉H₂Cl₆O₃·0.16­C₄H₁₀O, (II), bi­cyclo­[2.2.1]­hept‐2‐ene‐endo‐cis‐5,6‐di­carboxyl­ic acid, C₉H₁₀O₄, (III), 1,2,3,4,7,7‐hexa­chloro­bi­cyclo­[2.2.1]­hept‐2‐ene‐endo‐cis‐5,6‐di­carboxyl­ic acid, C₉H₄Cl₆O₄, (IVa) and (IVb), and ethyl 1,2,3,4,7,7‐hexa­chloro‐6‐carboxybi­cyclo­[2.2.1]­hept‐2‐ene‐endo‐cis‐5‐carboxyl­ate monohydrate, C₁₁H₈Cl₆O₄·H₂O, (V). Compounds (I) and (II) were prepared by a standard Diels–Alder reaction from maleic anhydride and cyclo­penta­diene or hexa­chloro­cyclo­penta­diene, respectively. The crystal‐growing processes of these compounds led to surprising results: rapid recrystallization of (I) from diethyl ether and (II) from petroleum ether gave crystals of these compounds, however, crystallization by slow evaporation techniques using common solvents yielded new compounds in which the five‐membered heterocycle has been cleaved.     

[Bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­alkane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato) complexes of nickel(II)

The structures of a series of four‐coordinate nickel(II) complexes of the form [Ni(sacsac)L] PF₆ (sacsac = pentane‐2,4‐di­thione anion; L = (Ph₂P)₂(CH₂)_n, n = 1,2,3) have beendetermined. These are [bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­methane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato‐S,S′)­nickel(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Ni(C₂₅H₂₂P₂)(C₅H₇S₂)]PF₆, [1,2‐bis­(di­phenylphosphino)­ethane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato–S,S′)­nickel(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Ni(C₂₆H₂₄P₂)(C₅H₇S₂)]PF₆, and [1,3‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­propane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato‐S,S′)­nickel(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Ni(C₂₇H₂₆P₂)(C₅H₇S₂)]PF₆. All have a distorted square‐planar arrangement about Ni with angles around Ni varying with the length of the hydro­carbon chain.     

2,4‐Di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazones of 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benz­aldehyde, 2,4‐di­hydroxy­aceto­phenone and 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benzo­phenone

In 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benz­aldehyde 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate {or 4‐[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)­hydrazono­methyl]­benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate}, C₁₃H₁₀N₄O₆·C₃H₇NO, (X), 2,4‐di­hydroxy­aceto­phenone 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­form­am­ide solvate (or 4‐{1‐[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)hydrazono]ethyl}benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate), C₁₄H₁₂N₄O₆·C₃H₇NO, (XI), and 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benzo­phenone 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­acet­amide solvate (or 4‐­{[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)hydrazono]phenyl­methyl}benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­acet­amide solvate), C₁₉H₁₄N₄O₆·C₄H₉NO, (XII), the molecules all lack a center of symmetry, crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups and have been observed to exhibit non‐linear optical activity. In each case, the hydrazone skeleton is fairly planar, facilitated by the presence of two intramolecular hydrogen bonds and some partial N—N double‐bond character. Each molecule is hydrogen bonded to one solvent mol­ecule.     

Hydrogen‐bonded complexes of 2‐pyridone with centrosymmetric and non‐centrosymmetric dicarboxylic acids

2‐Pyridone (2‐oxo­pyrimidine) forms hydrogen‐bonded com­plexes with di­carboxyl­ic acids, the molar ratio of 2‐pyridone/di­carboxyl­ic acid being 2:1 for the complexes with oxalic acid (ethanedioic acid), 2C₅H₅NO·C₂H₂O₄, (I), and trans‐β‐hydro­muconic acid (trans‐hex‐3‐enedioic acid), 2C₅H₅NO·C₆H₈O₄, (II), and 1:1 for the complexes with trans‐glutaconic acid (trans‐pent‐2‐enedioic acid), C₅H₅NO·C₅H₆O₄, (III), and l ‐­tartaric acid (l ‐2,3‐di­hydroxy­butane­dioic acid), C₅H₅NO·C₄H₆O₆·H₂O, (IV). Common features in the hydrogen‐bonding patterns were found for the centrosymmetric and non‐centrosymmetric acids, respectively. The 2‐pyridone mol­ecule takes the lactam form in these crystals.     

Inclusion of HNEt3+ in an acyclic tetraphenolate

The acyclic tetraphenolic derivative 2,2′‐methyl­ene­bis[6‐(3‐tert‐butyl‐2‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl­benzyl)‐4‐methyl­phenol] reacts with excess triethyl­amine in aceto­nitrile to form a molecular complex, i.e. triethyl­ammonium 2‐(3‐tert‐butyl‐2‐hydroxy‐5‐methylbenzyl)‐6‐[3‐(3‐tert‐butyl‐2‐hydroxy‐5‐methylbenzyl)‐2‐hydroxy‐5‐methylbenzyl]‐4‐methylphenolate aceto­nitrile sol­vate, C₆H₁₆N⁺·­C₃₉H₄₇O₄^?·­C₂H₃N, where the organic HNEt₃⁺ cation is included in the partial cone defined by the aromatic faces of the acyclic poly­phenolate.     

2‐{[Tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]aminomethylene}cyclohexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one and its 6‐hydroxy and 6‐methoxy derivatives

The title compounds, 2‐{[tris­(hydroxy­methyl)­methyl]­amino­methyl­ene}cyclo­hexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one, C₁₁H₁₅NO₄, (I), 6‐hydroxy‐2‐{[tris­(hydroxy­methyl)­methyl]­amino­methyl­ene}­cyclo­hexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one, C₁₁H₁₅NO₅, (II), and 6‐methoxy‐2‐{[tris­(hydroxy­methyl)­methyl]­amino­methyl­ene}­cyclo­hexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one, C₁₂H₁₇NO₅, (III), adopt the keto–amine tautomeric form, with the formal hydroxy H atom located on the N atom, and the NH group and oxo O atom display a strong intramolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond. The N—H⋯O hydrogen‐bonded rings are almost planar and coupled with the cyclo­hexa­diene rings. The carbonyl O atoms accept two other H atoms from the alcohol groups of adjacent mol­ecules in (I), and one from the alcohol and one from the phenol group in (II), but from only one alcohol H atom in (III).     

Disappearance of intramolecular stacking due to one‐atom movement or increment of a `propyl­ene linker' in pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine‐based ­flexible models

In the crystal structures of 4,6‐di­methyl­thio‐1‐[3‐(4,6‐di­methyl­thio‐2H‐pyra­zolo­[3,4‐d]­py­rimi­din‐2‐yl)­propyl]‐1H‐py­ra­­zolo­[3,4‐d]­py­rimi­dine, C₁₇H₂₀N₈S₄, and 1‐[4‐(4‐meth­oxy‐6‐methyl­thio‐1H‐pyra­zolo­[3,4‐d]py­rimi­din‐1‐yl)­butyl]‐5‐meth­yl‐6‐methyl­thio‐4,5‐di­hydro‐1H‐pyra­zolo­[3,4‐d]py­rimi­din‐4‐one, C₁₈H₂₂N₈O₂S₂, only intermolecular stacking due to aromatic π–π interactions between pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidinerings is present.     

Diphenyl(2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐di­thiolato‐S,S′)plumbane at 295 K and diphenyl(2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐di­thiolato‐S,S′)stannane at 150 K

Molecules of di­phenyl(2‐thio­xo‐1,3‐di­thiole‐4,5‐di­thiol­ato‐S,S′)­plumbane, [Pb(C₃S₅)(C₆H₅)₂], are linked into sheets via two intermolecular Pb?S_thione interactions of 3.322 (4) and 3.827 (4) Å; the Pb centre has a distorted octahedral geometry. In contrast, mol­ecules of ­di­phenyl(2‐thio­xo‐1,3‐di­thiole‐4,5‐di­thiol­ato‐S,S′)­stannane, [Sn(C₃S₅)(C₆H₅)₂], are linked into chains via a single intermolecular Sn—S_thione interaction of 2.8174 (9) Å; the Sn centre has a distorted trigonal‐bipy­ramidal geometry.     

3‐Germyl‐3,3‐di­methyl­propionic acid derivatives

The crystal structures of 3,3‐di­methyl‐3‐(tri­chloro­germyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₅H₉O₂)Cl₃], 3,3‐di­methyl‐3‐(tri­phenyl­germyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₆H₅)₃(C₅H₉O₂)], and 3,3‐di­methyl‐3‐(tri‐p‐toly­lgermyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₇H₇)₃(C₅H₉O₂)], have slightly distorted tetrahedral geometries about the Ge atoms. All the structures form dimers via strong O—H·O hydrogen bonds, resulting in eight‐membered rings that can be best described in terms of graph‐set notation (8).     

Comparison of conventional and synchrotron X‐ray structure deter­minations of the adduct 1,2,4,5‐tetrahydroxybenzene–2,5‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinone (1/1) and a conventional X‐ray structure determination of 1,2,4,5‐tetrahydroxybenzene monohydrate

The X‐ray structure of 1,2,4,5‐tetra­hydroxy­benzene (benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetrol) monohydrate, C₆H₆O₄·H₂O, (I), reveals columns of 1,2,4,5‐tetra­hydroxy­benzene parallel to the b axis that are separated by 3.364 (12) and 3.453 (11) Å. Molecules in adjacent columns are tilted relative to each other by 27.78 (8)°. Water mol­ecules fill the channels between the columns and are involved in hydrogen‐bonding interactions with the 1,2,4,5‐tetra­hydroxy­benzene mol­ecules. The crystal structure of the adduct 1,2,4,5‐tetra­hydroxy­benzene–2,5‐di­hydroxy‐1,4‐benzo­quinone (1/1), C₆H₆O₄·C₆H₄O₄, (II), reveals alternating mol­ecules of 1,2,4,5‐tetra­hydroxy­benzene and 2,5‐di­hydroxy‐1,4‐benzo­quinone (both lying on inversion centers), and a zigzag hydrogen‐bonded network connecting mol­ecules in three dimensions. For compound (II), the conventional X‐ray determination, (IIa), is in very good agreement with the synchrotron X‐ray determination, (IIb). When differences in data collection temperatures are taken into account, even the displacement parameters are in very good agreement.     

Four tri­fluoro­methyl­nitro­benzene analogues

The crystal structures of four tri­fluoro­methyl­nitro­benzene analogues (CF₃)C₆H₃(NO₂)[C₄H₈N₂]R (where C₄H₈N₂ is piperazinyl and R is ethyl carboxyl­ate, CO₂C₂H₅, or phenyl, C₆H₅), have been determined, and their conformations and packing arrangements are compared. The four compounds are ethyl 4‐[4‐nitro‐2‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]­piperazine‐1‐car­boxyl­ate, (I), and ethyl 4‐[2‐nitro‐4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phen­yl]piper­azine‐1‐carboxyl­ate, (II), both C₁₄H₁₆F₃N₃O₄, and 1‐­[4‐nitro‐2‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]‐4‐phenyl­piperazine, (III), and 1‐[2‐nitro‐4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]‐4‐phenyl­piperazine, (IV), both C₁₇H₁₆F₃N₃O₂. All mol­ecules adopt a rod‐like conformation, while the asymmetric units of (II) and (IV) contain two unique mol­ecules that pack as monodirectional pairs. All mol­ecules pack with C—H⋯O/F close contacts to all but one of the O atoms and to five of the 18 F atoms.     

Three monoalkoxy‐substituted nido‐platinaboranes: [(PPh3)2PtB10H11‐8‐(OCH3)], [(PPh3)2PtB10H11‐8‐{OCH(CH3)2}] and [(PPh3)2PtB10H10‐9‐{OCH(CH3)2}]

Each of the title compounds, 8‐methoxy‐7,7‐bis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine‐P)‐8,9:10,11‐di‐μH‐7‐platina‐nido‐undecaborane di­chloro­methane hemisolvate, [Pt(CH₁₄B₁₀O)(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂]·0.5CH₂Cl₂, (I), 8‐isopropoxy‐7,7‐bis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine‐P)‐8,9:10,11‐di‐μH‐7‐platina‐nido‐undecaborane di­chloro­methane solvate, [Pt(C₃H₁₈B₁₀O)(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂]·CH₂Cl₂, (II), and 9‐isopropoxy‐7,7‐bis­(tri­phenyl­phosphine‐P)‐8,9:10,11‐di‐μH‐7‐platina‐nido‐undecaborane di­chloro­methane solvate, [Pt(C₃H₁₈B₁₀O)(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂]·CH₂Cl₂, (III), has an 11‐vertex nido polyhedral skeleton, with the 7‐platinum centre ligating to two exo‐polyhedral PPh₃ groups and an alkoxy‐substituted polyhedral borane ligand. Compounds (II) and (III) are isomers. The Pt—B distances are in the range 2.214 (7)–2.303 (7) Å for (I), 2.178 (16)–2.326 (16) Å for (II) and 2.205 (6)–2.327 (6) Å for (III).     

The trans influence of the pyridine ligand on ruthenium(II)–porphyrin–carbene complexes

In the two ruthenium(II)–porphyrin–carbene complexes ­(di­benzoyl­carbenyl‐κC)(pyridine‐κN)(5,10,15,20‐tetra‐p‐tolyl­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N)­ruthenium(II), [Ru(C₁₅H₁₀O₂)(C₅H₅N)(C₄₈H₃₆N₄)], (I), and (pyridine‐κN)(5,10,15,20‐tetra‐p‐tolyl­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N)[bis(3‐tri­fluoro­methyl­phenyl)­carbenyl‐κC]­ruthenium(II), [Ru(C₁₅H₈F₆)(C₅H₅N)(C₄₈H₃₆N₄)], (II), the pyridine ligand coordinates to the octahedral Ru atom trans with respect to the carbene ligand. The C(carbene)—Ru—N(pyridine) bonds in (I) coincide with a crystallographic twofold axis. The Ru—C bond lengths of 1.877 (8) and 1.868 (3) Å in (I) and (II), respectively, are slightly longer than those of other ruthenium(II)–porphyrin–carbene complexes, owing to the trans influence of the pyridine ligands.     

Four cytotoxic N4‐substituted thiosemicarbazones derived from 2‐hydroxynaphthalene‐1‐carboxaldehyde

The X‐ray crystal structures are reported of four novel and potentially O,N,S‐tridentate donor ligands that demonstrate antitumour activity. These ligands are 1‐[(4‐methyl­thio­semicarbazono)methyl]‐2‐naphthol, C₁₃H₁₃N₃OS, (III), 1‐[(4‐ethylthio­semicarbazono)­methyl]‐2‐naphthol, C₁₄H₁₅N₃OS, (IV), 1‐[(4‐phenyl­thio­semicarbazono)­methyl]‐2‐naphthol, C₁₈H₁₅N₃OS, (V), and 1‐[(4,4‐di­methyl­thio­semicarbazono)­methyl]‐2‐naphthol di­methyl sulfoxide solvate, C₁₄H₁₅N₃OS·C₂H₆OS, (VI). These chelators are N4‐substituted thio­semicarbazones, each based on the same parent aldehyde, namely 2‐­zhydroxynaphthalene‐1‐carboxaldehyde isonicotinoylhydrazone. Conformational variations within this series are discussed in relation to the optimum conformation for metal‐ion binding.     

The antifolate trimetrexate: ­observation of the enzyme‐binding conformation

The crystal structure of the title compound contains four 2,4‐di­amino‐5‐methyl‐6‐[(3,4,5‐tri­methoxy­anilino)­methyl]­quin­az­oline mol­ecules, two di­methyl sulfoxide mol­ecules and three water mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, i.e. 4C₁₉H₂₃N₅O₃·2C₂H₆OS·3H₂O. All four quinazoline mol­ecules adopt trans,gauche conformations. An extensive hydrogen‐bond network involving N?N base‐pairing interactions, as well as the di­methyl sulfoxide and water mol­ecules, stabilizes the crystal structure.     

Linkage isomerism of organoplatinum(II) compounds coordinated by two 1,3‐di­methyl­barbiturate anions

In two linkage isomers, bis[1,3‐di­methyl‐2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)‐pyrimidine­trionato]‐C⁵,O⁴‐(ethyl­enedi­amine‐N,N′)platinum(II), [Pt(C₆H₇N₂O₃)₂(C₂H₈N₂)], (I), and bis[1,3‐di­methyl‐2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)‐py­rim­idine­tri­on­ato‐C⁵](ethyl­enediamine‐N,N′)­plati­num(II) di­hyd­rate, [Pt(C₆H₇N₂O₃)₂(C₂H₈N₂)]·2H₂O, (II), crystal­lized from the same aqueous solution containing [Pt(en)(OH)₂] and 1,3‐di­methyl­barbituric acid (Hdmbarb) in a 1:2 molar ratio, a pair of monodentate dmbarb^? anions coordinate to the Pt atom at tetrahedral C atoms for (II), while one dmbarb^? anion coordinates at the carbon and the other at a deprotonated enol oxy­gen for (I). The Pt—C distances in (I) and (II) are comparable: 2.112 (4) Å for (I), and 2.114 (4) and 2.117 (4) Å for (II).     

Hydro­gen bonding in proton‐transfer compounds of 5‐sulfosalicylic acid with bicyclic heteroaromatic Lewis bases

The crystal structures of quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate trihydrate, C₉H₈N⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·3H₂O, (I), 8‐hydroxy­quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate monohydrate, C₉H₈NO⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·H₂O, (II), 8‐amino­quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate dihydrate, C₉H₉N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·2H₂O, (III), and 2‐carboxy­quinolinium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxy­benzene­sulfonate quinolinium‐2‐carboxylate, C₁₀H₈NO₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·C₁₀H₇NO₂, (IV), four proton‐transfer compounds of 5‐sulfosalicylic acid with bicyclic heteroaromatic Lewis bases, reveal in each the presence of variously hydrogen‐bonded polymers. In only one of these compounds, viz. (II), is the protonated quinolinium group involved in a direct primary N⁺—H⋯O(sulfonate) hydrogen‐bonding interaction, while in the other hydrates, viz. (I) and (III), the water mol­ecules participate in the primary intermediate interaction. The quinaldic acid (quinoline‐2‐carboxylic acid) adduct, (IV), exhibits cation–cation and anion–adduct hydrogen bonding but no direct formal heteromolecular interaction other than a number of weak cation–anion and cation–adduct π–π stacking associations. In all other compounds, secondary interactions give rise to network polymer structures.