2,4‐Bis(α,α‐di­methyl­benzyl)­phenol

The structure of the title compound, 2,4‐bis(1‐methyl‐1‐phenylethyl)phenol, C₂₄H₂₆O, was found to have a torsion angle of 129.95 (13)° for the C—C bond that connects the benzyl carbon to the phenol ring ortho to the OH group. A value of ～50° was expected from molecular mechanics calculations. Intermolecular interactions, in particular O—H?O and edge–face π bonding, may contribute to this discrepancy. Intramolecular O—H?π bonding is also observed.     

17α,21‐Di­hydroxy‐16β‐methylpregna‐1,4‐diene‐3,11,20‐trione (meprednisone)

The title compound, C₂₂H₂₈O₅, is a commercial therapeutic agent of the steroid class. Both independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit have six‐membered A rings that are planar, while the B and C rings adopt normal chair conformations. The five‐membered D ring is in a 13β,14α‐half‐chair con­formation, and the B/C and C/D ring junctions are in trans positions. Cohesion in the crystal is provided by O—H⃛O hydrogen bonds, which generate chains of mol­ecules that are organized in a plane that lies along the crystallographic b axis.     

17‐Oxo‐5α‐androstane‐3α,4β‐diyl diacetate and 17‐oxo‐5β‐androstane‐3α,4β‐diyl diacetate

The title compounds, both C₂₃H₃₄O₅, are the 5α and 5β configurations of two diacetate epimers. The 5β‐diacetate crystallizes in an hexagonal structure, unusual for steroid molecules. The unit cell has an accessible solvent volume of 358 ų, responsible for clathrate behaviour. The 5β‐epimer also features some shorter than average bond lengths in the 3α,4β‐acetoxy groups. The conformations of the molecules of both epimers are compared with those obtained through abinitio quantum chemistry calculations. Cohesion of the crystals can be attributed to van der Waals and weak molecular C—H⋯O interactions.     

16α,17α‐Epoxy‐20‐oxopregn‐5‐en‐3β‐yl acetate

The title compound, C₂₃H₃₂O₄, has a 3β configuration, with the epoxy O atom at 16α,17α. Rings A and C have slightly distorted chair conformations. Because of the presence of the C5=C6 double bond, ring B assumes an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation slightly distorted towards an 8β‐sofa. Ring D has a conformation close to a 14α‐envelope. The acetoxy and acetyl substituents are twisted with respect to the average molecular plane of the steroid. The conformation of the mol­ecule is compared with that given by a quantum chemistry calculation using the RHF–AM1 (RHF = Roothaan Hartree–Fock) Hamiltonian model. Cohesion of the crystal can be attributed to van der Waals interactions and weak intermolecular C—H?O interactions, which link the mol­ecules head‐to‐tail along [101].     

13‐cis‐β,β‐Carotene and 15‐cis‐β,β‐carotene

13‐cis‐β,β‐Carotene, C₄₀H₅₆, crystallizes with a complete molecule in the asymmetric unit, whereas 15‐cis‐β,β‐carotene, also C₄₀H₅₆, has twofold symmetry about an axis through the central bond of the polyene chain. The polyene methyl groups are arranged on one side of the polyene chains for each molecule and the 6‐s‐cisβ end groups, with the cyclohexene rings in half‐chair conformations, are twisted out of the planes of the polyene chains by angles ranging from 41.37 (17) to 52.2 (4)°. The molecules in each structure pack so that the arms of one occupy the cleft of the next, and there is significant π–π stacking of the almost‐parallel polyene chains of the 15‐cis isomer, which approach at distances of 3.319 (1)–3.591 (1) Å.     

Aqua­nitro(α,β,γ,δ‐tetra­phenyl­porphy­rinato)­cobalt(III) N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide disolvate

In the title compound, [Co(tpp)(NO₂)(H₂O)]·2dmf or [Co(C₄₄H₂₈N₄)(NO₂)(H₂O)]·2C₃H₇NO, a distorted octahedral Co^III complex shows an orientational disorder such that the positions of the nitro and aqua ligands are exchanged. As a result, the averaged structure has an inversion centre at the Co atom. The di­methyl­form­amide mol­ecule also has a positional disorder.     

A 1,3,2‐ox­aza­borolidine dimer derived from (S)‐α,α‐di­phenyl­prolinol

The reaction of (S)‐α,α‐di­phenyl­prolinol with an excess of borane–tetra­hydro­furan complex yields a stable crystalline material with the composition C₃₄H₃₈B₂N₂O₂, which features a borane adduct of a spiro­cyclic structure with two ox­aza­borolidine rings joined by a central tetrahedral B atom. This dimeric ox­aza­borolidine complex, viz. 3,3,3′,3′‐tetra­phenyl‐1,1′‐spiro­bi(3a,4,5,6‐tetra­hydro‐3H‐pyrrolo­[1,2‐c][1,3,2]­ox­azaborole)–7‐borane, is the dominant product under various reaction conditions; its crystal structure is consistent with ¹¹B, ¹H and ¹³C NMR and IR analyses.     

3β‐Acetoxy‐5α,6β‐di­hydroxybisnorcholanic acid 2216 lactone

In the title compound, C₂₄H₃₆O₆, the ester linkage in ring A is equatorial. The six‐membered rings A, B and C have chair conformations. The five‐membered ring D adopts a 13β,14α‐half‐chair conformation and the E ring adopts an envelope conformation. The A/B, B/C and C/D ring junctions are trans, whereas the D/E junction is cis.     

Lipophilic Functionalized Cobyrinic-Acid Derivatives. Part 1. Cobester α-monoacids (α,α,α,β,β,β-hexamethyl α-hydrogen Coα, Coβ-dicyanocobyrinates)

The four α,α,α, β,β,β,-hexamethyl α-hydrogen Coα, Coβ-dicyanocobyrinates 2b, d–f , with a free b-, d-, e-, and f-propionic-acid function, respectively, were prepared by partial hydrolysis of heptamethyl Coα, Coβ-dicyanocobyrinate (cobester; 1 ) in aqueous sulfuric acid. The cobester monoacids 2b, d–f were obtained as a ca. 1:1:1:1 mixture which was separated. The monoacids were purified by chromatography and isolated in crystalline form. The position of the free propionic-acid function was determined by an extensive analysis of 2b, d–f using 2D-NMR techniques; an analysis of the C,H-coupling network topology resulted in an alternative assignment strategy for cobyrinic-acid derivatives, based on pattern recognition. Additional information on the structure of the most polar of the four hexamethyl cobyrinates, of the b-isomer 2b , was also obtained in the solid state from a single-crystal X-ray analysis. Earlier structural assignments based on 1D-NMR spectra of the corresponding regioisomeric monoamides 3b, d–f (obtained from crystalline samples of the monoacids 2b, d–f ) were confirmed by the present investigations.     

A moderate distortion of the `picket‐fence' porphyrin (cryptand‐222)potassium chlorido[meso‐α,α,α,α‐tetrakis(o‐pivalamidophenyl)porphyrinato]ferrate(II) n‐hexane monosolvate

As representative porphyrin model compounds, the structures of `picket‐fence' porphyrins have been studied intensively. The title solvated complex salt {systematic name: (4,7,13,16,21,24‐hexaoxa‐1,10‐diazabicyclo[8.8.8]hexacosane)potassium(I) [5,10,15,20‐tetrakis(2‐tert‐butanamidophenyl)porphyrinato]iron(II) n‐hexane monosolvate}, [K(C₁₈H₃₆N₂O₆)][Fe(C₆₄H₆₄N₈O₄)Cl]·C₆H₁₄ or [K(222)][Fe(TpivPP)Cl]·C₆H₁₄ [222 is cryptand‐222 or 4,7,13,16,21,24‐hexaoxa‐1,10‐diazabicyclo[8.8.8]hexacosane, and TpivPP is meso‐α,α,α,α‐tetrakis(o‐pivalamidophenyl)porphyrinate(2−)], [K(222)][Fe(TpivPP)Cl]·C₆H₁₄, is a five‐coordinate high‐spin iron(II) picket‐fence porphyrin complex. It crystallizes with a potassium cation chelated inside a cryptand‐222 molecule; the average K—O and K—N distances are 2.81 (2) and 3.05 (2) Å, respectively. One of the protecting tert‐butyl pickets is disordered. The porphyrin plane presents a moderately ruffled distortion, as suggested by the atomic displacements. The axial chloride ligand is located inside the molecular cavity on the hindered porphyrin side and the Fe—Cl bond is tilted slightly off the normal to the porphyrin plane by 4.1°. The out‐of‐plane displacement of the metal centre relative to the 24‐atom mean plane (Δ₂₄) is 0.62 Å, indicating a noticeable doming of the porphyrin core.