O‐Ethyl and O‐methyl N‐(2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl)thiocarbamate

In both the title structures, O‐ethyl N‐(2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d ‐gluco­pyran­osyl)­thio­carbam­ate, C₁₇H₂₅NO₁₀S, and O‐methyl N‐(2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d ‐gluco­pyran­osyl)­thiocar­bam­ate, C₁₆H₂₃NO₁₀S, the hexo­pyran­osyl ring adopts the ⁴C₁ conformation. All the ring substituents are in equatorial positions. The acetoxy­methyl group is in a gauche–gauche conformation. The S atom is in a synperi­planar conformation, while the C—N—C—O linkage is antiperiplanar. N—H?O intermolecular hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into infinite chains and these are connected by C—H?O interactions.     

Amarisolide monohydrate,a 2‐(β‐glu­cosyl)­neoclerodane

The absolute configuration of the neoclerodane glycoside amarisolide, presented here as the monohydrate, C₂₆H₃₆O₉·H₂O, has been determined by association with the known configuration of the glucose moiety. Its structure was established as 2β‐(O‐β‐d ‐gluco­pyran­osyl)­neocleroda‐3,13(16),14‐trien‐15,16‐epoxy‐18,19‐olide. Extensive hydrogen bonding among the hydroxyl groups of the sugar moiety forms layers which are interconnected by water mol­ecules.     

Methyl 3,6‐di‐O‐pivaloyl‐α‐d‐manno­pyran­oside

The X‐ray crystal structure analysis of the title compound, C₁₇H₃₀O₈, revealed a ⁴C₁ conformation of the pyran­osyl ring [Cremer–Pople puckering parameters of Q = 0.568 (2) Å, θ = 5.1 (2) and ϕ = 218 (3)°]. The structure shows no deviations from the geometric parameters of pyran­oside carbohydrates. The hydroxyl groups participate in O—H⃛O hydrogen bonds, forming a two‐dimensional pattern [O⃛O = 2.811 (3) and 2.995 (3) Å].     

Octa‐O‐acetyl‐β,β‐thiotrehalose

The structure of the title compound, C₂₈H₃₈O₁₈S, has been determined. The torsion angles of the glycosidic linkage in the non‐reducing disaccharide, ?_H and ?_H′, have values of 3 and 53°, respectively. The latter torsion angle is in agreement with the exo‐anomeric effect, whereas the former shows an eclipsed conformation. Both glyco­pyran­osyl residues adopt a slightly distorted chair conformation.     

2,3,3′,6‐Tetra‐O‐acetyl‐4,1′,6′‐trichloro‐4,1′,4′,6′‐tetradeoxygalactosucrose

At 160 K, one of the Cl atoms in the furanoid moiety of 3‐O‐acetyl‐1,6‐di­chloro‐1,4,6‐tri­deoxy‐β‐d ‐fructo­furan­osyl 2,3,6‐tri‐O‐acetyl‐4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐α‐d ‐galacto­pyran­oside, C₂₀H₂₇­Cl₃O₁₁, is disordered over two orientations, which differ by a rotation of about 107° about the parent C—C bond. The conformation of the core of the mol­ecule is very similar to that of 3‐O‐acetyl‐1,4,6‐tri­chloro‐1,4,6‐tri­deoxy‐β‐d ‐tagato­furanos­yl 2,3,6‐tri‐O‐acetyl‐4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐α‐d ‐galacto­pyran­oside, particularly with regard to the conformation about the glycosidic linkage.     

Methyl β‐d‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d‐allopyranoside tetrahydrate

The title compound, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₁·4H₂O, (I), crystallized from water, has an internal glycosidic linkage conformation having ϕ′ (O5_Gal—C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C4_All) = −96.40 (12)° and ψ′ (C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C4_All—C5_All) = −160.93 (10)°, where ring‐atom numbering conforms to the convention in which C1 denotes the anomeric C atom, C5 the ring atom bearing the exocyclic hydroxymethyl group, and C6 the exocyclic hydroxymethyl (CH₂OH) C atom in the βGalp and βAllp residues. Internal linkage conformations in the crystal structures of the structurally related disaccharides methyl β‐lactoside [methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside] methanol solvate [Stenutz, Shang & Serianni (1999). Acta Cryst. C 55 , 1719–1721], (II), and methyl β‐cellobioside [methyl β‐d ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside] methanol solvate [Ham & Williams (1970). Acta Cryst. B 26 , 1373–1383], (III), are characterized by ϕ′ = −88.4 (2)° and ψ′ = −161.3 (2)°, and ϕ′ = −91.1° and ψ′ = −160.7°, respectively. Inter‐residue hydrogen bonding is observed between O3_Glc and O5_Gal/Glc in the crystal structures of (II) and (III), suggesting a role in determining their preferred linkage conformations. An analogous inter‐residue hydrogen bond does not exist in (I) due to the axial orientation of O3_All, yet its internal linkage conformation is very similar to those of (II) and (III).     

4,1′,6′‐Trichloro‐4,1′,6′‐trideoxysucrose monohydrate

At 160 K, the gluco­pyran­osyl ring in 1,6‐di­chloro‐1,6‐di­deoxy‐β‐d ‐fructo­furan­osyl 4‐chloro‐4‐deoxy‐α‐d ‐gluco­pyran­oside monohydrate, C₁₂H₁₉Cl₃O₈·H₂O, has a near ideal ⁴C₁ chair conformation, while the fructo­furan­osyl ring has a ⁴T₃ conformation. The conformation of the sugar mol­ecule is quite different to that of sucralose, particularly in the conformation about the glycosidic linkage, which affects the observed pattern of intramolecular hydrogen bonds. A complex series of intermolecular hydrogen bonds links the sugar and water mol­ecules into an infinite three‐dimensional framework.     

Disorder and conformational analysis of methyl β‐d‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d‐xylopyranoside

Methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d ‐xylopyranoside, C₁₂H₂₂O₁₀, (II), crystallizes as colorless needles from water with positional disorder in the xylopyranosyl (Xyl) ring and no water molecules in the unit cell. The internal glycosidic linkage conformation in (II) is characterized by a ϕ′ torsion angle (C2′_Gal—C1′_Gal—O1′_Gal—C4_Xyl) of 156.4 (5)° and a ψ′ torsion angle (C1′_Gal—O1′_Gal—C4_Xyl—C3_Xyl) of 94.0 (11)°, where the ring atom numbering conforms to the convention in which C1 denotes the anomeric C atom, and C5 and C6 denote the hydroxymethyl (–CH₂OH) C atoms in the β‐Xyl and β‐Gal residues, respectively. By comparison, the internal linkage conformation in the crystal structure of the structurally related disaccharide, methyl β‐lactoside [methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside], (III) [Stenutz, Shang & Serianni (1999). Acta Cryst. C 55 , 1719–1721], is characterized by ϕ′ = 153.8 (2)° and ψ′ = 78.4 (2)°. A comparison of β‐(1→4)‐linked disaccharides shows considerable variability in both ϕ′ and ψ′, with the range in the latter (∼38°) greater than that in the former (∼28°). Inter‐residue hydrogen bonding is observed between atoms O3_Xyl and O5′_Gal in the crystal structure of (II), analogous to the inter‐residue hydrogen bond detected between atoms O3_Glc and O5′_Gal in (III). The exocyclic hydroxymethyl conformations in the Gal residues of (II) and (III) are identical (gauche–trans conformer).     

Intermolecular interactions in the chiral and racemic forms of 3‐­hydroxy‐2‐(1‐oxoisoindolin‐2‐yl)­butanoic acid derived from threonine

The title compounds, C₁₂H₁₃NO₄, are derived from l ‐threonine and dl ‐threonine, respectively. Hydro­gen bonding in the chiral derivative, (2S/3R)‐3‐hydroxy‐2‐(1‐oxoisoindolin‐2‐yl)­butanoic acid, consists of O—H_acid?O_alkyl—H?O=C_indole chains [O?O 2.659 (3) and 2.718 (3) Å], Csp³—H?O and three C—H?π_arene interactions. In the (2R,3S/2S,3R) racemate, conventional carboxylic acid hydrogen bonding as cyclical (O—H?O=C)₂ [graph set R₂²(8)] is present, with O_alkyl—H?O=C_indole, Csp³—H?O and C—H?π_arene interactions. The COOH group geometry differs between the two forms, with C—O, C=O, C—C—O and C—C=O bond lengths and angles of 1.322 (3) and 1.193 (3) Å, and 109.7 (2) and 125.4 (3)°, respectively, in the chiral structure, and 1.2961 (17) and 1.2210 (18) Å, and 113.29 (12) and 122.63 (13)°, respectively, in the racemate structure. The O—C=O angles of 124.9 (3) and 124.05 (14)° are similar. The differences arise from the contrasting COOH hydrogen‐bonding environments in the two structures.     

Phenyl‐ and mesitylglyoxylic acids: catemeric hydrogen bonding in two α‐keto acids

α‐Oxo­benzene­acetic (phenyl­glyoxy­lic) acid, C₈H₆O₃, adopts a transoid di­carbonyl conformation in the solid state, with the carboxyl group rotated 44.4 (1)° from the nearly planar benzoyl moiety. The heterochiral acid‐to‐ketone catemers [O?O = 2.686 (3) and H?O = 1.78 (4) Å] have a second, longer, intermolecular O—H?O contact to a carboxyl sp³ O atom [O?O = 3.274 (2) and H?O = 2.72 (4) Å], with each flat ribbon‐like chain lying in the bc plane and extending in the c direction. In α‐oxo‐2,4,6‐tri­methyl­benzene­acetic (mesityl­glyoxy­lic) acid, C₁₁H₁₂O₃, the ketone is rotated 49.1 (7)° from planarity with the aryl ring and the carboxyl group is rotated a further 31.2 (7)° from the ketone plane. The solid consists of chiral conformers of a single handedness, aggregating in hydrogen‐bonding chains whose units are related by a 3₁ screw axis, producing hydrogen‐bonding helices that extend in the c direction. The hydrogen bonding is of the acid‐to‐acid type [O?O = 2.709 (6) and H?O = 1.87 (5) Å] and does not formally involve the ketone; however, the ketone O atom in the acceptor mol­ecule has a close polar contact with the same donor carboxyl group [O?O = 3.005 (6) and H?O = 2.50 (5) Å]. This secondary hydrogen bond is probably a major factor in stabilizing the observed cisoid di­carbonyl conformation. Several intermolecular C—H?O close contacts were found for the latter compound.     

Methyl 4‐O‐β‐d‐galactopyranosyl α‐d‐mannopyranoside methanol 0.375‐solvate

Methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐α‐d ‐mannopyranoside methanol 0.375‐solvate, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₁·0.375CH₃OH, (I), was crystallized from a methanol–ethanol solvent system in a glycosidic linkage conformation, with ϕ′ (O5_Gal—C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C4_Man) = −68.2 (3)° and ψ′ (C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C4_Man—C5_Man) = −123.9 (2)°, where the ring is defined by atoms O5/C1–C5 (monosaccharide numbering); C1 denotes the anomeric C atom and C6 the exocyclic hydroxymethyl C atom in the βGalp and αManp residues, respectively. The linkage conformation in (I) differs from that in crystalline methyl α‐lactoside [methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐α‐d ‐glucopyranoside], (II) [Pan, Noll & Serianni (2005). Acta Cryst. C 61 , o674–o677], where ϕ′ is −93.6° and ψ′ is −144.8°. An intermolecular hydrogen bond exists between O3_Man and O5_Gal in (I), similar to that between O3_Glc and O5_Gal in (II). The structures of (I) and (II) are also compared with those of their constituent residues, viz. methyl α‐d ‐mannopyranoside, methyl α‐d ‐glucopyranoside and methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranoside, revealing significant differences in the Cremer–Pople puckering parameters, exocyclic hydroxymethyl group conformations and intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding patterns.     

2′,3′‐Dide­hydro‐3′‐deoxy­thymidine N‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone solvate (D4T·NMPO)

The title compound, 1‐(2′,3′‐di­deoxy‐β‐d ‐glycero‐pent‐2‐eno­furan­osyl)­thymine 1‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone solvate, C₁₀H₁₂N₂O₄·­C₅H₉NO, is an NMPO solvate of the anti‐AIDS agent D4T. In its crystal structure, both the pyrimidine and the furan­ose rings are planar and approximately perpendicular [82.1 (4)°]. The value of the torsion angle defining the orientation of the thymine with respect to the joined furane, χ = ?100.8 (4)°, and that of the torsion angle giving the orientation of the hydroxyl group linked to the furane ring, γ = 52.9 (5)°, show that the gly­cosyl­ic link adopts the so‐called high‐anti conformation and the 5′‐hydroxyl group is in the +sc position. The NMPO solvate is linked to the nucleoside through a fairly strong hydrogen bond.     

()‐3‐Oxo­cyclo­hexane­carboxyl­ic and ‐acetic acids: contrasting hydrogen‐bonding patterns in two homologous keto acids

The crystal structures for the title compounds reveal fundamentally different hydrogen‐bonding patterns. ()‐3‐Oxo­cyclo­hexanecarboxylic acid, C₇H₁₀O₃, displays acid‐to‐ketone catemers having a glide relationship for successive components of the hydrogen‐bonding chains which advance simultaneously by two cells in a and one in c [O?O = 2.683 (3) Å and O—H?O = 166°]. A pair of intermolecular close contacts exists involving the acid carbonyl group. The asymmetric unit in ()‐3‐oxo­cyclo­hexane­acetic acid, C₈H₁₂O₃, utilizes only one of two available isoenthalpic conformers and its aggregation involves mutual hydrogen bonding by centrosymmetric carboxyl dimerization [O?O = 2.648 (3) Å and O—H?O = 171°]. Intermolecular close contacts exist for both the ketone and the acid carbonyl group.     

Benzyl tert‐but­oxy­carbonyl‐α‐amino­isobutyrate

The small synthetic peptide, benzyl 2‐(tert‐but­oxy­carbonyl‐amino)­isobutyrate, C₁₆H₂₃NO₄, has the α‐helical conformation [|?| = 55.8 (2)° and |ψ| = 37.9 (2)°] observed in peptide fragments of peptaibols containing the α‐amino­isobutyric acid (Aib) residue. The structure shows no intramolecular hydrogen bonding, which would disrupt the limited conformational freedom associated with this amino acid. Two weak intermolecular hydrogen contacts are observed.     

(–)‐2‐(1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8aα‐Decahydro‐4aβ,8α‐dimethyl‐7‐oxo‐2β‐naphthyl)propionic acid: catemeric hydrogen bonding in a bicyclic sesquiterpenoid ζ‐keto acid

In the title compound, C₁₅H₂₄O₃, derived from a naturally occurring sesquiterpenoid, the asymmetric unit consists of two mol­ecules differing by 167.4 (8)° in the rotational conformation of the carboxyl group. Each molecule aggregates separately with its own type as carboxyl‐to‐ketone hydrogen‐bonding catemers [O⋯O = 2.715 (6) and 2.772 (6) Å, and O—H⋯O = 169 and 168°]. This generates two crystallographically independent single‐strand hydrogen‐bonding helices passing through the cell in the b direction, with opposite end‐to‐end orientations. One intermolecular C—H⋯O=C close contact exists for the carboxyl group of one of the mol­ecules. The structure is isostructural with that of a closely related unsaturated keto acid reported previously.     

Methyl 2‐O‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl‐α‐l‐rhamnopyranoside

The overall conformation of the title compound, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₀, is described by the glycosidic torsion angles ?_H (H1_g—C1_g—O2_r—C2_r) and ψ_H (C1_g—O2_r—C2_r—H2_r), which have values of 13.6 and 16.1°, respectively. The former is significantly different from the value predicted by consideration of the exo‐anomeric effect (?_H～ 60°) and from that in solution (?_H～ 50°), as determined previously by NMR spectroscopy. An intramolecular O3_r—H?O2_g hydrogen bond may help to stabilize the conformation in the solid state. The orientation of the hydroxy­methyl group of the glucose residue is gauche–gauche, with a torsion angle ω (O5_g—C5_g—C6_g—O6_g) of ?70.4 (4)°. Both pyranose rings are in their expected chair conformations, i.e.⁴C₁ for d ‐glucose and ¹C₄ for l ‐rhamnose.     

2′‐De­oxy‐2‐fluoro­tubercidin

In the title compound [systematic name: 7‐(2‐de­oxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranos­yl)‐2‐fluoro‐7H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidin‐2‐amine], C₁₁H₁₃FN₄O₃, the conformation of the N‐glycosylic bond is between anti and high‐anti [χ = −110.2 (3)°]. The 2′‐deoxy­ribofuranosyl unit adopts the N‐type sugar pucker (₄T³), with P = 40.3° and τ_m = 39.2°. The orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is −ap (trans), with a torsion angle γ = −168.39 (18)°. The nucleobases are arranged head‐to‐head. The crystal structure is stabilized by four inter­molecular hydrogen bonds of types N—H⋯N, N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O.     

Intermolecular O—H⃛O hydrogen bonding in the three independent molecules of (2S)‐3‐(4‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2‐(1‐oxoisoindolin‐2‐yl)­propanoic acid

The title compound, C₁₇H₁₅NO₄, derived from l ‐tyrosine, crystallizes with three independent mol­ecules which differ in the conformation of the asymmetric unit: the N—C—C—C_ipso torsion angles are ?71.7 (5), ?63.6 (6) and ?52.5 (5)°, respectively. Deformations in the phenol ring hydroxy O—C—C angles of 116.5 (4)/123.9 (4), 121.7 (5)/118.1 (4) and 122.4 (5)/118.6 (5)°, respectively, result from their respective intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding environments. Intermolecular O_acid—H?O=C_indole, O_phenol—H?O—H_phenol and O_phenol—H?O=C_indole hydrogen bonds, with O?O distances in the range 2.607 (4)–2.809 (4) Å, are present in combination with C—H?O and C—H?π_arene interactions. The primary hydrogen‐bonding systems assemble with graph sets R₃³(8) and R₃²(22).     

Conformational analysis of the disaccharide methyl α‐d‐mannopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐2‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d‐mannopyranoside monohydrate

The crystal structure of methyl α‐d ‐mannopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐2‐O‐acetyl‐β‐d ‐mannopyranoside monohydrate, C₁₅H₂₆O₁₂·H₂O, ( II ), has been determined and the structural parameters for its constituent α‐d ‐mannopyranosyl residue compared with those for methyl α‐d ‐mannopyranoside. Mono‐O‐acetylation appears to promote the crystallization of ( II ), inferred from the difficulty in crystallizing methyl α‐d ‐mannopyranosyl‐(1→3)‐β‐d ‐mannopyranoside despite repeated attempts. The conformational properties of the O‐acetyl side chain in ( II ) are similar to those observed in recent studies of peracetylated mannose‐containing oligosaccharides, having a preferred geometry in which the C2—H2 bond eclipses the C=O bond of the acetyl group. The C2—O2 bond in ( II ) elongates by ～0.02 Å upon O‐acetylation. The phi (?) and psi (ψ) torsion angles that dictate the conformation of the internal O‐glycosidic linkage in ( II ) are similar to those determined recently in aqueous solution by NMR spectroscopy for unacetylated ( II ) using the statistical program MA′AT, with a greater disparity found for ψ (Δ = ～16°) than for ? (Δ = ～6°).     

(+)‐3‐Oxo‐4‐pregnene‐20β‐carboxyl­ic acid: catemeric hydrogen bonding in a steroidal keto acid

The title keto acid, (+)‐23,24‐dinor‐3‐oxo­chol‐4‐en‐22‐oic acid, C₂₂H₃₂O₃, forms carboxyl‐to‐ketone hydrogen‐bonding catemers [O?O = 2.699 (4) Å and O—H?O = 173°], linking mol­ecules screw‐related in b. The four mol­ecules in the cell form two parallel counter‐directional chains, screw‐related in a. Intermolecular C—H?O=C close contacts to different neighboring mol­ecules were found for the ketone and the acid.