(2‐Methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato)­iron(III) and ‐copper(II) complexes

The crystal structures of tris(2‐methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato‐N,O)­iron(III), [Fe­(C₁₀­H₈­NO)₃], (I), and aqua­bis(2‐methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato‐N,O)­copper(II), [Cu­(C₁₀­H₈NO)₂­(H₂O)], (II), have been determined. Compound (I) has a distorted octahedral configuration, in which the central Fe atom is coordinated by three N atoms and three O atoms from three 2‐methylquinolin‐8‐olate ligands. The three Fe—O bond distances are in the range 1.934 (2)–1.947 (2) Å, while the three Fe—N bond distances range from 2.204 (2) to 2.405 (2) Å. In compound (II), the central Cu^II atom and H₂O group lie on the crystallographic twofold axis and the coordination geometry of the Cu^II atom is close to trigonal bipyramidal, with the three O atoms in the basal plane and the two N atoms in apical positions. The Cu—N bond length is 2.018 (5) Å. The Cu—O bond length in the basal positions is 1.991 (4) Å, while the Cu—O bond length in the apical position is 2.273 (6) Å. There is an intermolecular OW—H?O hydrogen bond which links the mol­ecules into a linear chain along the b axis.     

Paddlewheel dirhodium complexes bridged by para‐substituted benzoates

The dirhodium complex bis­(benzonitrile)tetra­kis[μ‐4‐(diethyl­amino)benzoato‐κ²O:O′]dirhodium(II)(Rh—Rh) benzonitrile disolvate, [Rh₂(C₁₁H₁₄NO₂)₄(C₇H₅N)₂]·2C₇H₅N, lies about an inversion centre. The dirhodium complex (methanol)tetra­kis(μ‐4‐nitro­benzoato‐κ²O:O′)(pyridine)dirhodium(II)(Rh—Rh) dichloro­methane solvate, [Rh₂(C₇H₄NO₄)₄(C₅H₅N)(CH₄O)]·CH₂Cl₂, lies in a general position in the unit cell, but the complexes dimerize around an inversion centre via O—H⋯O hydrogen bonding of the axial MeOH to a carboxyl­ate O atom. In the latter crystal structure, π–π stacking inter­actions between the bridging 4‐nitro­benzoate ligands and the axial pyridine ligand are observed between adjacent mol­ecules.     

Cobalt(II) and nickel(II) complexes of isoquinoline‐1‐carboxylate

trans‐Di­aqua­bis­(iso­quinoline‐1‐carboxyl­ato‐κ²N,O)­cobalt(II) dihydrate, [Co(C₁₀H₆NO₂)₂(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O, and trans‐di­aqua­bis­(iso­quinoline‐1‐carboxyl­ato‐κ²N,O)­nickel(II) dihydrate, [Ni(C₁₀H₆NO₂)₂(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O, contain the same isoquinoline ligand, with both metal atoms residing on a centre of symmetry and having the same distorted octahedral coordination. In the former complex, the Co—O(water) bond length in the axial direction is 2.167 (2) Å, which is longer than the Co—O(carboxylate) and Co—N bond lengths in the equatorial plane [2.055 (2) and 2.096 (2) Å, respectively]. In the latter complex, the corresponding bond lengths for Ni—O(water), Ni—O(carboxylate) and Ni—N are 2.127 (2), 2.036 (2) and 2.039 (3) Å, respectively. Both crystals are stabilized by similar stacking interactions of the ligand, and also by hydrogen bonds between the hydrate and coordinated water molecules.     

5‐n‐Butylpyridine‐2‐carboxylate–copper(II) and –iron(III) complexes

In trans‐bis(5‐n‐butyl­pyridine‐2‐carboxyl­ato‐κ²N,O)­bis­(methanol‐κO)copper(II), [Cu(C₁₀H₁₂NO₂)₂(CH₄O)₂], the Cu atom lies on a centre of symmetry and has a distorted octahedral coordination. The Cu—O(methanol) bond length in the axial direction is 2.596 (3) Å, which is much longer than the Cu—­O(carboxylate) and Cu—N distances in the equatorial plane [1.952 (2) and 1.977 (2) Å, respectively]. In mer‐tris(5‐n‐bu­tyl­pyridine‐2‐carboxyl­ato‐κ²N,O)­iron(III), [Fe(C₁₀H₁₂NO₂)₃], the Fe atom also has a distorted octahedral geometry, with Fe—O and Fe—N bond‐length ranges of 1.949 (4)–1.970 (4) and 2.116 (5)–2.161 (5) Å, respectively. Both crystals are stabilized by stacking interactions of the 5‐n‐butyl­pyridine‐2‐carboxyl­ate ligand, although hydrogen bonds also contribute to the stabilization of the copper(II) complex.     

Cyano­cobalt(III) complexes of penta‐ and tetra­dentate‐coordinated macrocyclic hexa­amines

The pendent‐arm macrocyclic hexa­amine trans‐6,13‐dimethyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐6,13‐diamine (L) may coordinate in tetra‐, penta‐ or hexa­dentate modes, depending on the metal ion and the synthetic procedure. We report here the crystal structures of two pseudo‐octa­hedral cobalt(III) complexes of L, namely sodium trans‐cyano­(trans‐6,13‐dimethyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐6,13‐diamine)cobalt(III) triperchlorate, Na[Co(CN)(C₁₃H₃₀N₆)](ClO₄)₃ or Na{trans‐[CoL(CN)]}(ClO₄)₃, (I), where L is coordinated as a penta­dentate ligand, and trans‐dicyano­(trans‐6,13‐dimethyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐6,13‐diamine)cobalt(III) trans‐dicyano­(trans‐6,13‐dimethyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐6,13‐diaminium)cobalt(III) tetra­perchlorate tetra­hydrate, [Co(CN)₂(C₁₄H₃₂N₆)][Co(CN)₂(C₁₄H₃₀N₆)](ClO₄)₄·4H₂O or trans‐[CoL(CN)₂]trans‐[Co(H₂L)(CN)₂](ClO₄)₄·4H₂O, (II), where the ligand binds in a tetra­dentate mode, with the remaining coordination sites being filled by C‐­bound cyano ligands. In (I), the secondary amine Co—N bond lengths lie within the range 1.944 (3)–1.969 (3) Å, while the trans influence of the cyano ligand lengthens the Co—N bond length of the coordinated primary amine [Co—N = 1.986 (3) Å]. The Co—CN bond length is 1.899 (3) Å. The complex cations in (II) are each located on centres of symmetry. The Co—N bond lengths in both cations are somewhat longer than in (I) and span a narrow range [1.972 (3)–1.982 (3) Å]. The two independent Co—CN bond lengths are similar [1.918 (4) and 1.926 (4) Å] but significantly longer than in the structure of (I), again a consequence of the trans influence of each cyano ligand.     

Penta­chloro‐1,3,6‐tris­(diethyl­phenyl­phosphino)­dirhenium(II,III)

The title complex [systematic name: penta­chloro‐1κ³Cl,2κ²Cl‐tris(diethylphenylphosphino)‐1κP,2κ²P‐dirhenium(II,III)(Re—Re)], 1,3,6‐Re₂Cl₅(PEt₂Ph)₃ or [Re₂Cl₅(C₁₀H₁₅P)₃], consists of dirhenium mol­ecules with eclipsed structures similar to those of previously characterized 1,3,6‐Re₂Cl₅(PR₃)₃ compounds. The Re—Re bond distance is 2.2262 (3) Å and the metal–metal bond order is 3.5.     

Azido­[1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene](penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate

In the title compound, azido‐2κN‐bis­[μ‐(1η⁵:2κP)‐di­phenyl­phosphino­cyclo­penta­dienyl][2(η⁵)‐penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­di­enyl]­iron(III)­rhodium(III) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [{Rh(C₁₀H₁₅)(N₃)}{Fe(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂}]PF₆ or [FeRh(C₁₀H₁₅)(μ‐C₁₇H₁₄P)₂(N₃)]PF₆, the coordination sphere of Rh^III can be described as pseudo‐tetrahedral, composed of two P atoms from a 1,1′‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ferrocene (dppf) ligand, an azido N atom and the centroid of the ring of a C₅Me₅ (Cp*) ligand. The two cyclo­penta­dienyl rings in the dppf moiety adopt an eclipsed conformation. The Rh⋯Fe distance is 4.340 (2) Å.     

3‐(4‐Cyano­phenyl)­pentane‐2,4‐dione and its copper(II) complex

The β‐diketone 3‐(4‐cyano­phenyl)­pentane‐2,4‐dione crystallizes as the enol tautomer 4‐(2‐hydroxy‐4‐oxopent‐2‐en‐3‐yl)­benzo­nitrile, C₁₂H₁₁NO₂, (I), with an intramolecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond [O⋯O = 2.456 (2) Å]. Reaction of (I) with copper acetate monohydrate in the presence of triethyl­amine leads to the formation of the copper(II) complexbis­[3‐(4‐cyano­phenyl)­pentane‐2,4‐dionato‐κ²O,O]copper(II), [Cu(C₁₂H₁₀NO₂)₂], (II). In the structure of (II), the Cu atom is coordinated by four β‐diketonate O atoms in a slightly distorted square‐planar geometry, with Cu—O distances in the range 1.8946 (11)–1.9092 (11) Å. The nitrile moieties in (II) make it a candidate for reaction with other metal ions to produce supramolecular structures.     

A pyrazine bis‐adduct of a binuclear rhodium(II) carboxylate containing 3,4,5‐triethoxybenzoate as the ­equatorial ligand

The title compound, tetrakis(μ‐3,4,5‐triethoxy­benzoato‐κ²O:O′)­bis­[(pyrazine‐κN)­rhodium(II)](Rh—Rh), [Rh₂(C₁₃H₁₇O₅)₄(C₄H₄N₂)₂], crystallizes on an inversion centre in the triclinic space group . The equatorial carboxyl­ate ligands bridge the two Rh^II atoms, giving a binuclear lantern‐like structure. The pyrazine mol­ecules occupy the two axial coordination sites. The phenyl rings are tilted by ca 10° with respect to the attached carboxyl­ate groups. The pyrazine planes have a torsion angle of ca 19° around the Rh—N bond with respect to the plane of the nearer carboxyl­ate group and are not coplanar with the Rh—Rh bond.     

Two novel bis­(2,9‐dimeth­yl‐1,10‐phenanthroline)copper(I) complexes: [Cu(dmp)2]2(PF6)2·0.5(bpmh)·CH3CN and [Cu(dmp)2][N(CN)2]

Two new salts of the cation [Cu^I(dmp)₂]⁺ (dmp is 2,9‐dimeth­yl‐1,10‐phenanthroline, C₁₄H₁₂N₂), namely bis­[bis­(2,9‐dimeth­yl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)copper(I)] bis­(hexa­fluorophos­phate) hemi[bis­(4‐pyridylmethyl­idene)hydrazine] acetonitrile solvate, [Cu(C₁₄H₁₂N₂)₂]₂(PF₆)₂·0.5C₁₂H₁₀N₄·C₂H₃N or [Cu(dmp)₂]₂(PF₆)₂·0.5(bpmh)·CH₃CN [bpmh is bis­(4‐pyridylmethyl­idene)hydrazine, C₁₂H₁₀N₄], (I), and bis­(2,9‐dimeth­yl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)copper(I) dicyanamide, [Cu(C₁₄H₁₂N₂)₂](C₂N₃) or [Cu(dmp)₂][N(CN)₂], (II), are reported. The Cu—N bond lengths and the distortion from idealized tetra­hedral geometry of the dmp ligands are discussed and compared with related compounds. The bpmh molecule in (I) is π–π stacked with a dmp ligand at a distance of 3.4 Å, rather than coordinated to the metal atom. The molecule lies across an inversion center in the crystal. In (II), the normally coordinated dicyanamide mol­ecule is present as an uncoordinated counter‐ion.     

trans‐Bis­(diethano­lamine)­bis­(iso­thio­cyanato)­nickel(II)

In the neutral title complex, trans‐bis(2,2′‐imino­di­ethanol‐N,O)­bis­(iso­thio­cyanato)­nickel(II), [Ni(NCS)₂(C₄H₁₁NO₂)₂], the iso­thio­cyanate ions and the di­ethanol­amine mol­ecules act as mono­dentate and bi­dentate ligands, respectively. The Ni^II ion exhibits a distorted octahedral configuration with crystallographically imposed inversion symmetry and N_NCS—Ni—N_amine and N_NCS—Ni—O_amine bond angles of 88.78 (10) and 89.44 (10)°, respectively. The Ni—N bond distances are in the range 2.069 (3)–2.096 (2) Å. The mol­ecules are linked by hydrogen bonds to form a three‐dimensional infinite lattice.     

Adducts of nickel(II) acetylacetonate chelating with heterocyclic bases: 3‐­cyanopyridine and 4‐cyanopyridine

In both title compounds, (acetyl­acetonato‐O,O′)­bis(3‐cyano­pyridine‐N)­nickel(II), (I), and (acetyl­acetonato‐O,O′)­bis(4‐cyanopyridine‐N)­nickel(II), (II), both [Ni(C₅­H₇O₂)₂(C₆H₄N₂)₂], the Ni^II atom, which is situated on a centre of symmetry, is octahedrally coordinated. Distances and angles for (I) and (II), respectively, are: Ni—O 2.009 (2)/2.016 (2) and 2.0110 (16)/2.0238 (18) Å, Ni—N 2.116 (3) and 2.179 (2) Å, O—Ni—O 91.86 (10) and 90.19 (7)°, and O—Ni—N 91.27 (11)/90.19 (11) and 89.65 (8)/90.79 (7)°.     

Molecular building blocks for solid‐state chalcogenides: solvothermal synthesis of [Mn(en)3]Te4 and [Fe(en)3]2(Sb2Se5)

Two new molecular metal chalcogenides, tris­(ethyl­enedi­amine‐N,N′)­manganese(II) tetratelluride, [Mn(C₂H₈N₂)₃]Te₄, (I), and bis­[tris­(ethyl­enedi­amine‐N,N′)­iron(II)] penta­seleno­diantimonate(III), [Fe(C₂H₈N₂)₃]₂(Sb₂Se₅), (II), containing the isolated molecular building blocks Te₄^2? and Sb₂Se₅^4?, have been synthesized by solvothermal reactions in an ethyl­enedi­amine solution at 433 K. The anion Te₄^2? in (I) is a zigzag oligometric chain with Te—Te bond lengths in the range 2.709–2.751 Å. There is a very short contact [3.329 (1) Å] between a pair of neighboring Te₄^2? anions. In (II), each Sb atom is surrounded by three Se atoms to give a tripodal coordination. One of the three independent Se atoms is a μ₂‐bridging ligand between two Sb atoms; the other two are terminal.     

Adducts of 1,1,1‐tris(4‐hydroxyphenyl)ethane with diamines: three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded frameworks formed with 1,6‐diaminohexane and 2,2′‐bipyridyl

The adduct 1,6‐di­amino­hexane–1,1,1‐tris(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­ethane (1/2) is a salt {hexane‐1,6‐diyldiammonium–4‐[1,1‐bis(4‐hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]phenolate (1/2)}, C₆H₁₈N₂²⁺·2C₂₀H₁₇O₃^?, in which the cation lies across a centre of inversion in space group P. The anions are linked by two short O—H?O hydrogen bonds [H?O 1.74 and 1.76 Å, O?O 2.5702 (12) and 2.5855 (12) Å, and O—H?O 168 and 169°] into a chain containing two types of R(24) ring. Each cation is linked to four different anion chains by three N—H?O hydrogen bonds [H?O 1.76–2.06 Å, N?O 2.6749 (14)–2.9159 (14) Å and N—H?O 156–172°]. In the adduct 2,2′‐bipyridyl–1,1,1‐tris(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­ethane (1/2), C₁₀H₈N₂·2C₂₀H₁₈O₃, the neutral di­amine lies across a centre of inversion in space group P2₁/n. The tris­(phenol) mol­ecules are linked by two O—H?O hydrogen bonds [H?O both 1.90 Å, O?O 2.7303 (14) and 2.7415 (15) Å, and O—H?O 173 and 176°] into sheets built from R(38) rings. Pairs of tris­(phenol) sheets are linked via the di­amine by means of a single O—H?N hydrogen bond [H?N 1.97 Å, O?N 2.7833 (16) Å and O—H?N 163°].     

The first metalloporphyrin dimer linked by a bridging phenylenedicarbene ligand

In the first bis­[ruthenium(II)–porphyrin]–dicarbene complex, μ‐[1,4‐phenyl­ene­bis(phenyl­methyl­idene‐κC)]bis­[(ethanol‐κO)(5,10,15,20‐tetra‐p‐tolyl­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N)ruthenium(II)] 1,2‐di­chloro­ethane trisolvate, [Ru₂(C₂₀H₁₄)(C₄₈H₃₆N₄)₂(C₂H₆O)₂]·3C₂H₄Cl₂, an inversion center is located at the center of the μ‐phenyl­ene group, leading to a parallel arrangement for the pair of porphyrin ring systems. The bond lengths and angles compare favourably with literature values for ruthenium–porphyrin–monocarbene complexes; the Ru=C(carbene) bond length and the C(phenyl)—C(carbene)—C(phenyl­ene) angle are 1.865 (3) Å and 112.3 (3)°, respectively. The Ru^II ion is displaced out of the C₂₀N₄ porphyrin least‐squares plane (by 0.2373 Å) toward the bridging ligand of the C_i‐symmetry dimer. The porphyrin ring systems of the dimer thus exhibit mildly domed conformations.     

Di‐μ‐methoxo‐bis({N,N′‐bis­[2‐(3,5‐di­methyl­pyrazol‐1‐yl)­ethyl]­amine‐κ3N}copper(II)) bis­(hexa­fluoro­phosphate)

The title compound, [Cu₂(C₁₄H₂₃N₅)₂(CH₃O)₂](PF₆)₂, has a doubly methoxo‐bridged centrosymmetric copper dimer cation involving two tridentate bis­(pyrazolyl)­amine ligands. The geometry of each Cu^II atom is a distorted square pyramid with two N atoms of the pyrazole in bis­[2‐(3,5‐di­methyl‐1‐pyrazolyl)­ethyl]­amine (bpea) and two μ₂‐bridging O atoms of the methoxo ligands forming the basal plane, and the amine N atom occupying the axial position. In the bridging plane, the Cu—O bond lengths are 1.940 (4) and 1.942 (4) Å, and the bond angles for O—Cu—O and Cu—O—Cu are 76.1 (2) and 103.9 (2)°, respectively. The Cu?Cu distance is 3.058 (1) Å. The central four‐membered ring lies on an inversion centre.     

Diaqua­bis[4‐(4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐yl)­benzoato‐κ2O,O′]cobalt(II), and the cadmium(II) and copper(II) analogues: new self‐complementary hydrogen‐bond donor/acceptor modules for designing hydrogen‐bonded frameworks

In the isostructural title complexes, [M(C₉H₆N₃O₂)₂(H₂O)₂] [M = Co^II, (I), Cd^II, (II), and Cu^II, (III); the metal centres reside on a twofold axis in the space group C2/c for (I) and (II)], the metal centres are surrounded by four O atoms from two O,O′‐bidentate carboxyl­ate groups and by two trans‐coordinated aqua ligands, forming a distorted octa­hedral environment. The mol­ecules possess four hydrogen‐bond donor (two aqua ligands) and four hydrogen‐bond acceptor sites (two triazole groups), and aggregate by self‐association, forming two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded frameworks [via O—H⋯N inter­actions; O⋯N = 2.749 (3)–2.872 (3) Å]. The layers are parallel and are tightly packed with short inter­layer distances of 4.93, 4.95 and 5.01 Å for (I), (II) and (III), respectively.     

[μ-6,9-Cl-8-(OMe)-6,9-(η5-C5Me5)2-arachno-6,9,5-Rh2SB7H7]

The title compound, μ-6,9-chloro-8-methoxy-6,9-bis­(η⁵-penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl)-6,9-dirhoda-5-thia-arachno-decaborane(7), [Rh₂(CH₁₀B₇OS)(C₁₀H₁₅)₂Cl], has a single Cl atom bridging the two remote rhodium `prow' vertices of an arachno ten-vertex dirhoda­thia­decaborane cluster, with Rh—­Cl distances of 2.3475 (11) and 2.3536 (11) Å, and an Rh—Cl—Rh angle of 106.82 (4)°.     

[cis‐{η2‐(Ph3PAu)2}Ph3PCr(CO)4]·THF,featuring the shortest known separation between two Au metal centres in a heteronuclear Au2M cluster

The title compound, tetra­carbonyl‐1κ⁴C‐tris­(tri­phenyl­phos­phino)‐1κP,2κP,3κP‐triangulo‐chromiumdigold(Au—Au)(2 Cr—Au) tetra­hydro­furan solvate, [Au₂Cr(C₁₈H₁₅P)₃(CO)₄]·C₄H₈O, is a stable isolobal analogue of the extremely labile [(η²‐H₂)CrL_n–1] molecular hydrogen complex (n = 6; L is a neutral ligand, e.g. CO or PPh₃), and features the shortest known separation [2.6937 (2) Å] between two Au atoms in a triangular heteronuclear metal‐cluster framework.     

An oxo‐bridged centrosymmetric tetranuclear titanium compound

The title compound, octa‐tert‐butoxybis­[μ₃‐2,2′‐(N‐methyl­imino)­diethanolato]­di‐μ‐oxo‐tetratitanium(IV), [Ti₂O{(OCH₂CH₂)₂(NCH₃)}{(CH₃)₃CO}₄]₂ or [Ti₄(C₅H₁₁NO₂)₂(C₄H₉O)₈O₂], lies about an inversion centre, and displays the less usual zigzag configuration. One O atom of the N‐methyl­diethoxo­amine ligand bridges the symmetry‐related Ti atoms, while the other bridges the two independent Ti atoms, with the N atom binding to give a facial configuration. Four ^tBuO⁻ ligands and a bridging oxide complete the respective five‐ and sixfold coordination of the two Ti atoms. The Ti—O bond lengths range in a self‐consistent fashion from 1.7624 (17) to 2.0878 (18) Å, while the Ti—N bond length is 2.374 (2) Å.