1‐(2‐{4‐[6‐Hydro­xy‐2‐(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­benzo­[b]­thiol‐3‐yl­carbonyl]­phenoxy}ethyl)­piperidinium chloride

The title compound, raloxifene hydro­chloride, C₂₈H₂₈NO₄S⁺·Cl^?, belongs to the benzo­thio­phene class of antiosteoporotic drugs. In the molecular cation, the 2‐phenol ring sustains a dihedral angle of 45.3 (1)° relative to the benzo­[b]­thio­phene system. The benzo­[b]­thio­phene and phenyl ring planes are twisted with respect to the carbonyl plane, with the smallest twist component occurring between the phenyl and carbonyl planes. The N atom bears the positive charge in the molecular cation and the piperidine ring adopts an almost perfect chair conformation. The Cl^? anion is involved in the formation of N—H?Cl and O—H?Cl intermolecular hydrogen bonds, which lead to the formation of a layer of molecular cations.     

Rotenone α‐oxime

The structure determination of the title compound, rotenone α‐oxime [systematic name: 1,2,12,12a‐tetra­hydro‐8,9‐di­meth­oxy‐2‐(1‐methyl­ethenyl)‐[1]­benzo­py­rano­[3,4‐b]­furo­[2,3‐h][1]benzo­pyran‐6(6H)‐one oxime], C₂₃H₂₃NO₆, confirms that the mol­ecule has an approximately V‐shaped structure. One of the rings has a typical cyclo­hexene‐like monoplanar conformation and the central ring adopts a 1,2‐diplanar conformation.     

Three ginkgolide hydrates from Ginkgo biloba L.: ginkgolide A monohydrate,ginkgolide C sesquihydrate and ginkgolide J dihydrate,all determined at 120 K

A low‐temperature structure of ginkgolide A monohydrate, (1R,3S,3aS,4R,6aR,7aR,7bR,8S,10aS,11aS)‐3‐(1,1‐dimethylethyl)‐hexa­hydro‐4,7b‐di­hydroxy‐8‐methyl‐9H‐1,7a‐epoxymethano‐1H,6aH‐cyclo­penta­[c]­furo­[2,3‐b]­furo­[3′,2′:3,4]­cyclopenta­[1,2‐d]­furan‐5,9,12(4H)‐trione monohydrate, C₂₀H₂₄O₉·H₂O, obtained from Mo Kα data, is a factor of three more precise than the previous room‐temperature determination. A refinement of the ginkgolide A monohydrate structure with Cu Kα data has allowed the assignment of the absolute configuration of the series of compounds. Ginkgolide C sesquihydrate, (1S,2R,3S,3aS,4R,6aR,7aR,7bR,8S,10aS,11S,11aR)‐3‐(1,1‐di­methyl­ethyl)‐hexa­hydro‐2,4,7b,11‐tetrahydroxy‐8‐methyl‐9H‐1,7a‐epoxy­methano‐1H,6aH‐cyclopenta­[c]­furo­[2,3‐b]­furo­[3′,2′:3,4]­cyclo­penta­[1,2‐d]­furan‐5,9,12(4H)‐trione sesquihydrate, C₂₀H₂₄O₁₁·1.5H₂O, has two independent diterpene mol­ecules, both of which exhibit intramolecular hydrogen bonding between OH groups. Ginkgolide J dihydrate, (1S,2R,3S,3aS,4R,6aR,7aR,7bR,8S,10aS,11aS)‐3‐(1,1‐di­methyl­ethyl)‐hexa­hydro‐2,4,7b‐tri­hydroxy‐8‐methyl‐9H‐1,7a‐epoxy­methano‐1H,6aH‐cyclo­penta­[c]­furo­[2,3‐b]furo[3′,2′:3,4]­cyclo­penta­[1,2‐d]­furan‐5,9,12(4H)‐trione dihydrate, C₂₀H₂₄O₁₀·2H₂O, has the same basic skeleton as the other ginkgolides, with its three OH groups having the same configurations as those in ginkgolide C. The conformations of the six five‐membered rings are quite similar across ­ginkgolides A–C and J, except for the A and F rings of ginkgolide A.     

Imino Diels–Alder adducts. I. Two furo­[3,2‐c]­quinoline diastereoisomers

The structures of two diastereoisomers of 9‐chloro‐8‐fluoro‐4‐phenyl‐2,3,3a,4,5,9b‐hexa­hydro­furo­[3,2‐c]­quinoline, C₁₇H₁₅ClFNO, are very similar. The orientation of the furan ring, as a result of its fusion to the quinoline nucleus, constitutes the significant difference between the two structures. The dihedral angles between the furan and phenyl rings are 73.4 (1) and 63.8 (1)°.     

Two isomers of 2,4‐di­benzyl‐8‐azabicyclo­[3.2.1]­octan‐3‐ol

The crystal structures of the title compounds, 2α,4α‐di­benzyl‐3α‐tropanol (2α,4α‐di­benzyl‐8‐methyl‐8‐aza­bi­cyclo­[3.2.1]­octan‐3α‐ol), C₂₂H₂₇NO, (I), and 2α,4α‐di­benzyl‐3β‐tropanol (2α,4α‐di­benzyl‐8‐methyl‐8‐aza­bi­cyclo­[3.2.1]­octan‐3β‐ol), C₂₂H₂₇NO, (II), show that both compounds have a piperidine ring in a chair conformation and a pyrrolidine ring in an envelope conformation. Isomer (I) is asymmetric, the benzyl groups having different orientations, whereas isomer (II) is mirror symmetric, and the N and O atoms, the C atom attached to the hydroxy group, and the methyl C atom attached to the N atom lie on the mirror plane. In the crystal structures of both (I) and (II), the mol­ecules are linked together by intermolecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds to form chains that run parallel to the a direction in (I) and parallel to b in (II).     

An angularly fused three‐ring precursor to phytuberin

The title compound, 3,3a,5,5a,6,7,8,9‐octahydro‐3a‐hydroxy‐5a‐methyl‐8‐(2‐prop­enyl)­furo­[3,2‐c]­iso­benzo­furan‐2‐one, C₁₄H₂₀O₄, crystallizes with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. The molecules have similar metric parameters but differ in the conformations of the isopropenyl groups. The hydroxyl groups form one‐dimensional chains of hydrogen bonds.     

Three 5H‐indeno­[1,2‐c]­pyridazin‐5‐one derivatives,potent type‐B mono­amine oxidase inhibitors

The structures of three compounds, namely 7‐methoxy‐2‐[3‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]‐9H‐indeno­[1,2‐c]­pyridazin‐9‐one, C₁₉H₁₁F₃N₂O₂, (Id), 6‐methoxy‐2‐[3‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]‐9H‐indeno­[1,2‐c]­pyridazin‐9‐one, C₁₉H₁₁F₃N₂O₂, (IId), and 2‐methyl‐6‐(4,4,4‐tri­fluoro­butoxy)‐9H‐indeno­[1,2‐c]­pyridazin‐9‐one, C₁₆H₁₃F₃N₂O₂, (IIf), which are potent reversible type‐B mono­amine oxidase (MAO‐B) inhibitors, are presented and discussed. Compounds (Id) and (IId) crystallize in a nearly planar conformation. The crystal structures are stabilized by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The packing is dominated by π–π stacking interactions between the heterocyclic central moieties of centrosymmetrically related mol­ecules. In compound (IIf), the tri­fluoro­ethyl termination is almost perpendicular to the plane of the ring.     

A highly functionalized ferrocenyl­pyrazolo­[2,3‐a]­pyridine

The crystal structure of [2‐(4‐bromo­phenyl)‐4‐cyano‐5‐ferrocenyl­pyrazolo­[2,3‐a]­pyridin‐7‐yl]­aceto­nitrile, C₂₆H₁₇N₄FeBr or [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₁H₁₂BrN₄)], shows that the pyrazolo­pyridine ring system (PP), the bromo­phenyl ring (BP) and the cyclo­penta­diene ring (Cp) are nearly planar. The PP ring system is twisted out of the plane of the BP and Cp rings by about 20°.     

A pimpinellin monomer and dimer isolated from the roots of Esenbeckia grandiflora

X‐ray diffraction studies carried out on single crystals of the monomeric, viz. 5,6‐di­methoxy‐2H‐furo­[2,3‐h][1]benzo­pyran‐2‐one, C₁₃H₁₀O₅, and dimeric, viz. 5,5′,6,6′‐tetra­methoxy‐3,3′,4,4′‐tetra­hydro‐2H,2′H‐3,3′:4,4′‐bi­(furo­[2,3‐h][1]benzo­pyran)‐2,2′‐dione, C₂₆H₂₀O₁₀, forms of pimpinellin have revealed that, following cyclo­dimerization, the carbonyl groups are head‐to‐head with respect to one another. In the monomer, the heterocyclic ring is planar, but it exhibits a twisted‐boat conformation in the dimer. Both the monomer and the dimer interact through C—H⋯O interactions.     

3‐Phenyl‐4H‐furo­[3,2‐c]­chromen‐4‐one

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₇H₁₀O₃, is the first example of a furocoumarin containing three fused rings. The tricyclic furocoumarin fragment is perfectly planar. The phenyl substituent forms a dihedral angle of 39.52 (8)° with the plane of the tricyclic system. The crystal packing involves centrosymmetric dimers interconnected by strong π‐interactions between their furo­[3,2‐c]­coumarin fragments [at distances of 3.42 (4) Å].     

Two furo­pyridine complexes of nickel(II) iso­thio­cyanate

Pyridine fused with a furan ring (fupy), and its di­methyl derivative, have been used for the first time as ligands to synthesize potentially new Werner clathrates. The extended aromatic system of pyridine‐like ligands influences considerably the molecular structure of prepared nickel complexes. The molecular structure of tetrakis­(furo­[3,2‐c]­pyridine)­bis(iso­thio­cyanato)­nickel(II) tetra­hydro­furan (THF) solvate, [Ni(NCS)₂(C₇H₅NO)₄]·C₄H₈O or [Ni(NCS)₂(fupy)₄]·THF, (I), reveals a `four‐blade propeller' arrangement of ligands, with the angles between the fupy planes and the basal octahedron plane spanning the range 38.7–55.3°. These angles are much larger (69.9–78.8°) in the centrosymmetric complex tetrakis(2,3‐di­methyl­furo­[3,2‐c]­pyridine)­bis­(iso­thio­cyanato)nickel(II) 6.6‐hydrate, [Ni(NCS)₂(C₉H₉NO)₄]·6.6H₂O or [Ni(NCS)₂(Me₂fupy)₄]·6.6H₂O, (II), in which crystallographically imposed inversion symmetry is present.     

A stacked pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine‐based flexible mol­ecule: the effect on stacking of a bulky iso­propyl group in comparison with a methyl/ethyl group

In the crystal structure of 1,3‐bis(4,6‐diiso­propyl­sulfanyl‐1H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidin‐1‐yl)­propane, C₂₅H₃₆N₈S₄, the pairs of pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine rings in the mol­ecule stack as a result of intramolecular π–π interactions between the heterocyclic rings. The crystal packing also exhibits an intermolecular C—H...π interaction between one methyl group of an iso­propyl group and a pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine ring.     

6‐Acetonyldi­hydro­avicine

The title compound, 1‐(5‐methyl‐5,6‐di­hydro­[1,3]­dioxolo­[4′,5′:4,5]­benzo­[c][1,5]­dioxolo­[4,5‐j]­phenanthridin‐6‐yl)­acetone, C₂₃H₁₉NO₅, isolated from the stem bark of Zanthoxy­lum rhoifolium, crystallizes as a racemate in space group P. The structure shows two aromatic ring systems, each terminated by a five‐membered dioxole ring, coupled by an N‐containing ring. The core of the mol­ecule is almost planar; the planes of the two ring systems form an angle of 18.42 (6)°. The packing shows the mol­ecules parallel to each other and about 3.5 Å apart with graphite‐type interactions. The N‐methyl and acetone groups, which are anti with respect to one another, lie out of the plane and pack in spaces between neighbouring mol­ecules.     

A comparison of the ring conformational properties of two derivatives prepared from the same diene ­diacetate precursor

Results of single‐crystal X‐ray experiments performed for the title compounds, (1S,2R,3S,4R,5R)‐4‐benzyl­oxy‐2‐[1‐(benzyl­oxy)­allyl]‐5‐hydroxy­methyl‐2,3,4,5‐tetra­hydro­furan‐3‐ol, C₂₂H₂₆O₅, (I), and (3R,5S,6S,7S,8S)‐3,6‐bis­(benzyl­oxy)‐5‐iodo­methyl‐2,3,4,5‐tetra­hydro­furo­[3,2‐b]­furan‐2‐one, C₂₁H₂₁IO₅, (II), demonstrate that the tetra­hydro­furan ring that is common to both structures adopts a different conformation in each mol­ecule. Structural analyses of (I) and (II), which were prepared from the same precursor, indicate that their different conformations are caused by hydrogen‐bonding interactions in the case of (I) and the presence of a fused bicyclic ring system in the case of (II). Density functional theory calculations on simplified analogs of (I) and (II) are also presented.     

Methoxy‐ether and crown‐ether ­derivatives of tetrahomodioxa‐ and octahomotetraoxacalix­[4]­arenes

Three methoxy­‐ether and one methoxy‐­ether/crown‐ether derivatives of p‐tert‐butyl­tetrahomodioxa‐ and p‐R‐octahomo­tetraoxacalix­[4]­arenes (R = methyl, tert‐butyl, H) have been investigated. The first three compounds, 7,15,21,27‐tetra‐tert‐butyl‐29,30,31,32‐tetra­methoxy‐3,11‐dioxapenta­cyclo­[23.3.­1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^19,23]­ditriaconta‐1(29),5,7,­9(30),­13,15,‐17(31),­19,21,23(32),25,27‐dodecaene, C₅₀H₆₈O₆, 33,34,35,36‐tetra­methoxy‐7,15,23,31‐tetra­methyl‐3,11,19,27‐tetra­oxa­penta­cyclo[27.3.1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^21,25]­hexa­tri­aconta‐1(33),5,7,9(34),13,15,­17(35),21,23,25(36),29,31‐dodecaene, C₄₀H₄₈O₈, and 7,23‐di‐tert‐butyl‐33,34,35,36‐tetra­methoxy‐3,11,19,27‐tetraoxapenta­cyclo­[27.3.1.1^5,9.1^13,17.1^21,25]­hexatriaconta‐1(33),5,7,9(34),13,15,­17(35),‐ 21,23,25(36),29,31‐dodecaene, C₄₄H₅₆O₈, in the partial‐cone or 1,2‐alternate conformations, present the common feature of methoxy‐­ether self‐inclusion, while the fourth, 42,43‐di­methoxy‐7,15,23,31‐tetra­methyl‐3,11,19,27,34,37,40‐heptaoxahexa­cyclo[15.15.9.1^5,9.1^21,25.0^13,41.0^29,33]­tritetra­conta‐5(42),6,8,13(41),­14,16,21(43),22,24,29(33),30,32‐dodecaene, C₄₂H₅₀O₉, adopts the 1,3‐alternate conformation owing to the presence of a 1,3‐polyether chain.     

The molecular and supramolecular structures of the isomeric compounds 5,7‐di­methoxy­imidazo­[1,2‐c]­pyrimidine and 7‐methoxy‐1‐methyl­imidazo­[1,2‐a]­pyrimidin‐5(1H)‐one

The supramolecular structures of the isomeric compounds 5,7‐di­methoxy­imidazo­[1,2‐c]­pyrimidine, C₈H₉N₃O₂, (I), and 7‐methoxy‐1‐methyl­imidazo­[1,2‐a]­pyrimidin‐5(1H)‐one, C₈H₉N₃O₂, (II), are determined by weak C—H⃛N and C—H⃛O hydrogen bonds in (I), which generate alternating linked centrosymmetric R(8) and R(10) rings that form a ribbon running parallel to the c axis, and by C—H⃛O bonds in (II), which link the mol­ecules into sheets comprising centro­symmetric R(10) and R(22) rings.     

Mikanolide from Jamaican Mikania micrantha

Mikanolide [systematic names: 1,10:2,3‐di­epoxy‐6,8‐di­hy­droxy‐11‐vinyl­germacr‐4‐ene 12,14‐di‐γ‐lactone and 7,10a‐di­methyl‐1a,1b,2a,6a,7,9a,10,10a‐octa­hydro‐4H‐6,3‐metheno­furo­[3,2‐c]­bisoxireno­[f,h]­oxa­cyclo­undecin‐4,8(6H)‐dione], C₁₅H₁₄O₆, derived from a variety of Mikania micrantha growing in Portland, Jamaica, contains a methyl­cyclo­decane ring fused to an unsaturated planar α,γ‐lactone, an envelope‐type near‐planar vinyl‐β,γ‐lactone and two epoxide moieties. The crystal packing shows stacks of mikanolide mol­ecules interlocked via a network of non‐classical C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the lactone units.     

Hydro­gen bonds and C—H⋯O ­interactions in the enol tautomer of 4‐­(phenylsulfonyl)spiro­[cyclo­pentane‐1,9′‐[9H]­fluorene]‐2,3‐dione

The title compound, 2‐hydroxy‐1‐(phenyl­sulfonyl)­spiro­[cyclo­pentene‐4,9′‐[9H]­fluoren]‐3‐one, C₂₃H₁₆O₄S, crystallized in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/n with one mol­ecule as the asymmetric unit. The hydroxyl‐H atom is ordered and participates in a single intramolecular hydrogen bond and in a single intermolecular hydrogen bond, in which the O_D—H distance is 0.90 (2), H?O_A is 2.34 (3), O_D?O_A is 2.987 (2) Å and O_D—H?O_A is 129 (2)°. The intermolecular hydrogen bond forms an R(12) cyclic dimer about a center of symmetry. There are six leading C—H?O interactions. Taken together, these interactions form a three‐dimensional network. Structural comparisons are made with tetrabenzodi­spiro­[4.0.4.3]­tridecatetraene.     

A chiral furocoumarin

The furocoumarin 1,2‐di­hydro‐2‐(1,2‐di­hydroxy­prop‐2‐yl)‐8H‐furo­[2,3‐h]­benzo­pyran‐8‐one crystallizes from methanol–water as the monohydrate C₁₄H₁₄O₅·H₂O. Both chiral centers have the S configuration. Both OH groups and both H atoms of the water mol­ecule form intermolecular hydrogen bonds with O?O distances in the range 2.7686 (18)–2.8717 (18) Å.     

Hydro­gen‐bonded dimers in N‐(2‐nitro­phenyl­thio)­saccharin

In the title compound, 2‐(2‐nitro­phenyl­thio)‐1,2‐benzo­thia­zol‐3(2H)‐one 1,1‐dioxide, 2‐O₂NC₆H₄S(C₇H₄NO₃S) or C₁₃H₈N₂­O₅S₂, the planes of the saccharin and nitro­phenyl­thiol­ate portions are almost orthogonal. The mol­ecules are linked by C—H?O=S hydrogen bonds [C?O 3.308 (3) Å, H?O 2.44 Å and C—H?O 155°] into cyclic centrosymmetric R²₂(16) dimers, reinforced by aromatic π?π stacking interactions between the nitrated aryl rings.