Bis­(acetato‐κ2O,O′)(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ2N,N′)mercury(II) in two differently hydrated crystal forms

Two differently hydrated crystal forms of the title compound, viz. bis­(acetato‐κ²O,O′)(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)­mercury(II), [Hg(C₂H₃O₂)₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₂)] or [HgAc₂(dmph)] [dmph is 2,3‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenantroline (neocuproine) and Ac is acetate], (I), and tris­[bis­(acetato‐κ²O,O′)(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)­mercury(II)] hexadecahydrate, [Hg(C₂H₃O₂)₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₂)]₃·16H₂O or [HgAc₂(dmph)]₃·16H₂O, (II), are presented. Both structures are composed of very simple monomeric units, which act as the building blocks of complex packing schemes stabilized by a diversity of π–π and hydrogen‐bonding interactions.     

[(1R,2R)‐1,2‐Di­amino­cyclo­hexane‐κ2N,N′](α‐di­imine‐κ2N,N′)­platinum(II) bis­(hexa­fluoro­phosphate), where α‐di­imine is 2,2′‐bi­pyridine and 1,10‐phen­anthroline

The title Pt^II complexes, viz. (2,2′‐bi­pyridine‐κ²N,N′)[(1R,2R)‐1,2‐di­amino­cyclo­hexane‐κ²N,N′]­platinum(II) bis­(hexa­fluoro­phosphate), [Pt(C₆H₁₄N₂)(C₁₀H₈N₂)](PF₆)₂, and [(1R,2R)‐1,2‐di­amino­cyclo­hexane‐κ²N,N′](1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)platinum(II) bis­(hexa­fluoro­phosphate), [Pt(C₆H₁₄N₂)(C₁₂H₈N₂)](PF₆)₂, containing an aromatic α‐di­imine and a non‐planar di­amino­cyclo­hexane, both form a ladder‐type structure, which is constructed via loose π–π stacking on the α‐di­imine ligands and hydrogen bonding between the cyclic amines and the counter‐anions. In the former compound, there are two independent complex cations, both of which have a twofold axis through the Pt atom.     

catena‐Poly­[[trans‐bis­(ethane‐1,2‐di­amine‐κ2N,N′)copper(II)]‐μ‐di­thion­ato‐κ2O:O′] and trans‐di­aqua­bis­(propane‐1,3‐di­amine‐κ2N,N′)copper(II) di­thionate

In title an­hydro­us catena‐poly­[[trans‐bis­(ethane‐1,2‐di­amine‐κ²N,N′)copper(II)]‐μ‐di­thionato‐κ²O:O′], [Cu(S₂O₆)(C₂H₈N₂)₂]_n or [{H₂N(CH₂)₂NH₂}₂Cu(O·O₂SSO₂·O)]_∞, successive Cu atoms are bridged by a single doubly charged di­thionate group, forming a one‐dimensional polymer with inversion centres at the metal atoms and the mid‐point of the S—S bond [Cu—O = 2.5744 (15) Å]. In title (hydrated) trans‐di­aqua­bis­(propane‐1,3‐di­amine‐κ²N,N′)copper(II) di­thionate, [Cu(C₃H₁₀N₂)₂(H₂O)₂](S₂O₆) or [{H₂N(CH₂)₃NH₂}₂Cu(OH₂)₂](S₂O₆), both ions have imposed 2/m symmetry. The `axial' anion components are displaced by a pair of water ligands [Cu—O = 2.439 (3) Å], the shorter Cu—O distance being compensated by the lengthened Cu—N distance [2.0443 (18), cf. 2.0100 (13) and 2.0122 (16) Å].     

Unexpected oxidation of a diphos­phine by bis­(1,3‐diphenylpropane‐1,3‐dionato)­cobalt(II), [Co(dbm)2]

The reaction of bis­(1,3‐diphenylpropane‐1,3‐dionato)cobalt(II), [Co(dbm)₂], with bis­(diphenyl­phosphino)ethane (dppe) affords the coordination polymer catena‐poly[[bis­(1,3‐diphenyl­propane‐1,3‐dionato‐κ²O,O′)cobalt(II)]‐μ‐ethyl­enebis(diphenyl­phosphine oxide)‐κ²O:O′], trans‐[Co(C₁₅H₁₁O₂)₂(C₂₆H₂₄O₂P₂)]_n, as a result of oxidation of the diphos­phine. The Co atom is octa­hedral, with a CoO₆ coordination sphere, and the chelating dbm ligands adopt a trans configuration. The Co atom also lies on a centre of inversion, with a further symmetry centre bis­ecting the bridging ethyl­enebis(diphenyl­phosphine oxide) ligand.     

Ethyl­ammonium and diethyl­ammonium salts of chloranilic acid

In the crystals of two title salts of chloranilic acid (2,5‐di­chloro‐3,6‐di­hydroxy‐p‐benzo­quinone), namely ethyl­ammonium chloranilate, C₂H₈N⁺·C₆HCl₂O₄^?, (I), and diethyl­ammonium chloranilate, C₄H₁₂N⁺·C₆HCl₂O₄^?, (II), the chloranilate ions are present as a hydrogen‐bonded dimer which has an inversion center. The ethyl­ammonium and diethyl­ammonium ions link the dimers through N—H?O hydrogen bonds, forming a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bond network in (I) and a one‐dimensional chain in (II).     

Two dimeric CuII benzoate derivatives solvated with aceto­nitrile

The title compounds, tetrakis(μ‐benzoato‐O:O′)­bis(2,6‐di­amino­pyridine)‐1κN,2κN‐dicopper(II)–aceto­nitrile (1/2), [Cu₂(C₇H₅O₂)₄(C₅H₇N₃)₂]·2C₂H₃N, (I), and bis­(aceto­nitrile)‐1κN,2κN‐tetrakis(μ‐benzoato‐O:O′)­dicopper(II)–aceto­nitrile (1/1.5), [Cu₂(C₇H₅O₂)₄(C₂H₃N)₂]·1.5C₂H₃N, (II), crystallize as aceto­nitrile solvates exhibiting different stability. They have similar molecular structures with discrete dimeric units located at crystallographic inversion centres. The copper ions are bridged by four benzoate groups and neutral N‐donor ligands, viz. 2,6‐di­amino­pyridine in (I) and aceto­nitrile in (II), are coordinated at apical positions. The diverse stability is probably due to hydrogen‐bond interactions of the solvated aceto­nitrile mol­ecules with neighbouring dimers in compound (I).     

Bis­[(2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diamine‐κ2N,N′)(piperidine‐2‐car­boxylato‐κ2N,O)­platinum(II)] sulfate

The title compound, [Pt(C₆H₁₀NO₂)(C₅H₁₄N₂)]₂(SO₄), crystallizes with two cations in the asymmetric unit. The two complex cations, which have a square‐planar Pt^II coordination, are chemically identical but differ slightly in the conformations of their amine groups. A neutral complex, viz. (2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­di­amine‐κ²N,N′)bis(2‐piperidine­carb­oxyl­ato‐κN)platinum(II), is shown to form in solution and to change rapidly into the title compound.     

Bis(pyridine‐2,6‐dimethanol‐N,O,O′)cobalt(II) and ‐copper(II) disacchar­inate dihydrate: three‐dimensional structures with extensive hydrogen bonds and aromatic π–π‐stacking interactions

Bis­(pyridine‐2,6‐di­methanol‐N,O,O′)­cobalt(II) disaccharinate dihydrate, [Co(C₇H₉NO₂)₂](C₇H₄NO₃S)₂·2H₂O, (I), and bis­(pyridine‐2,6‐di­methanol‐N,O,O′)copper(II) disaccharinate dihydrate, [Cu(C₇H₉NO₂)₂](C₇H₄NO₃S)₂·2H₂O, (II), collectively [M(dmpy)₂](sac)₂·2H₂O (where M is Co^II or Cu^II, sac is the saccharinate anion and dmpy is pyridine‐2,6‐di­methanol), are isostructural. The [M(dmpy)₂]²⁺ cations exhibit distorted octahedral geometry in which the two neutral dmpy species act as tripodal N,O,O′‐tridentate ligands. The crystal packing is determined by hydrogen bonding, as well as by weak pyridine–saccharinate π–π‐stacking interactions.     

Comparative X‐ray study of three nickel(II)–thio­cyanate compounds

Three cis nickel–di­thio­cyanate (SCN) complexes with different N,N′‐bidentate bases have been prepared and their crystal structures determined: bis(2,2′‐bi­pyridine‐N,N′)­bis­(thio­cyan‐­ato‐N)­nickel(II), [Ni(SCN)₂­(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂], bis(1,10‐phen­anthroline‐N,N′)­bis­(thio­cyanato‐N)­nickel(II), [Ni(SCN)₂­(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂], and bis(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐N,N′)­bis­(thiocyanato‐N)nickel(II) mono­hydrate, [Ni(SCN)₂­(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂]·H₂O. Distortions due to ligand size are discussed.     

[N,N′‐Bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminato]­nickel(II) and [N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminato]copper(II)

In the title compounds, {2,2′‐[2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphenolato‐κ⁴N,N′,O,O′}nickel(II), [Ni(C₁₉H₂₀N₂O₂)], and {2,2′‐[2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphenolato‐κ⁴N,N′,O,O′}copper(II), [Cu(C₁₉H₂₀N₂O₂)], the Ni^II and Cu^II atoms are coordinated by two iminic N and two phenolic O atoms of the N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminate (SALPD^2?, C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₂^2?) ligand. The geometry of the coordination sphere is planar in the case of the Ni^II complex and distorted towards tetrahedral for the Cu^II complex. Both complexes have a cis configuration imposed by the chelate ligand. The dihedral angles between the N/Ni/O and N/Cu/O coordination planes are 17.20 (6) and 35.13 (7)°, respectively.     

Bis(1,10‐phenanthroline)(thio­sulfato)­manganese(II) methanol solvate and catena‐poly­[[di­aqua(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline)­manganese(II)]‐μ‐thio­sulfato]

The structure of bis(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)(thio­sulfato‐κ²O:S)­manganese(II) methanol solvate, [Mn(S₂O₃)(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂]·CH₃OH, is made up of Mn²⁺ centers coordinated to two bidentate phenanthroline (phen) groups and an S,O‐chelating thio­sulfate anion, forming monomeric entities. The structure of catena‐poly­[[di­aqua(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phen­anthro­line‐κ²N,N′)­manganese(II)]‐μ‐thio­sulfato‐κ²O:S], [Mn(S₂O₃)(C₁₄H₁₂N₂)(H₂O)₂]_n, is polymeric, consisting of Mn(dmph)(H₂O)₂ units (dmph is 2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline) linked by thio­sulfate anions acting in an S,O‐chelating manner.     

Adducts of nickel(II) acetylacetonate chelating with heterocyclic bases: 3‐­cyanopyridine and 4‐cyanopyridine

In both title compounds, (acetyl­acetonato‐O,O′)­bis(3‐cyano­pyridine‐N)­nickel(II), (I), and (acetyl­acetonato‐O,O′)­bis(4‐cyanopyridine‐N)­nickel(II), (II), both [Ni(C₅­H₇O₂)₂(C₆H₄N₂)₂], the Ni^II atom, which is situated on a centre of symmetry, is octahedrally coordinated. Distances and angles for (I) and (II), respectively, are: Ni—O 2.009 (2)/2.016 (2) and 2.0110 (16)/2.0238 (18) Å, Ni—N 2.116 (3) and 2.179 (2) Å, O—Ni—O 91.86 (10) and 90.19 (7)°, and O—Ni—N 91.27 (11)/90.19 (11) and 89.65 (8)/90.79 (7)°.     

Molecular building blocks for solid‐state chalcogenides: solvothermal synthesis of [Mn(en)3]Te4 and [Fe(en)3]2(Sb2Se5)

Two new molecular metal chalcogenides, tris­(ethyl­enedi­amine‐N,N′)­manganese(II) tetratelluride, [Mn(C₂H₈N₂)₃]Te₄, (I), and bis­[tris­(ethyl­enedi­amine‐N,N′)­iron(II)] penta­seleno­diantimonate(III), [Fe(C₂H₈N₂)₃]₂(Sb₂Se₅), (II), containing the isolated molecular building blocks Te₄^2? and Sb₂Se₅^4?, have been synthesized by solvothermal reactions in an ethyl­enedi­amine solution at 433 K. The anion Te₄^2? in (I) is a zigzag oligometric chain with Te—Te bond lengths in the range 2.709–2.751 Å. There is a very short contact [3.329 (1) Å] between a pair of neighboring Te₄^2? anions. In (II), each Sb atom is surrounded by three Se atoms to give a tripodal coordination. One of the three independent Se atoms is a μ₂‐bridging ligand between two Sb atoms; the other two are terminal.     

Three complexes of bis(N‐methyl­benzo­hydro­xamato‐O,O′)copper(II)

The first single‐crystal studies of three bis‐transoid Cu–hydrox­amate salts, bis(3‐methoxy‐4,N‐dimethyl­benzo­hydrox­amato‐O,O′)copper(II), [Cu(C₁₀H₁₂NO₃)₂], bis(4‐chloro‐N‐methyl­benzo­hydro­xamato‐O,O′)copper(II), [Cu­(C₈­H₇­Cl­NO₂)₂], bis(N‐methyl‐3,5‐di­nitro­benzo­hydro­xamato‐O,O′)copper(II)–chloro­form (1/2), [Cu­(C₈­H₆­N₃O₆)₂]·­2CHCl₃, are presented. The Cu atom in each of the title compounds sits at a center of inversion and displays a nearly square‐planar geometry with the hydro­xamate‐O atoms connected to it in a syn configuration. The N atoms are in a transoid configuration. Each five‐membered Cu–hydro­xamate ring is planar, thus providing evidence that a planar N atom is present in each ring. The phenyl groups are twisted with respect to the hydro­xamate group by ～40–54°. The angular strain of the sp² carbonyl oxy­gen is significant (～10° from ideal).     

Copper(II) and zinc(II) complexes of pyridine‐2,6‐di­carboxyl­ic acid

The title compounds, bis­(pyridine‐2,6‐di­carboxyl­ato‐N,O,O′)copper(II) monohydrate, [Cu(C₇H₄NO₄)₂]·H₂O, andbis(pyridine‐2,6‐dicarboxylato‐N,O,O′)zinc(II) trihydrate, [Zn(C₇H₄NO₄)₂]·3H₂O, have distorted octahedral geometries about the metal centres. Both metal ions are bonded to four O atoms and two pyridyl‐N atoms from the two terdentate ligand mol­ecules, which are nearly perpendicular to each other. The copper(II) complex has twofold crystallographic symmetry and contains two different ligand mol­ecules, one of which is neutral and another doubly ionized. In contrast, the zinc(II) complex contains two identical singly ionized ligand mol­ecules. Both crystal structures are stabilized by O—H?O intermolecular hydrogen bonds between the complex and the water mol­ecules.     

Comparison of two polymeric transition metal complexes with 1,4‐benzenedicarboxylate ions as bridging ligands, [Co(C8H4O4)(C12H8N2)(H2O)] and [Cu(C8H4O4)(C10H9N3)]·H2O

The title complexes, catena‐poly[[aqua(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)­cobalt(II)]‐μ‐benzene‐1,4‐di­carboxyl­ato‐κ²O¹:O⁴], [Co(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₂H₈N₂)(H₂O)], (I), and catena‐poly[[[(di‐2‐pyridyl‐κN‐amine)copper(II)]‐μ‐benzene‐1,4‐di­carboxyl­ato‐κ⁴O¹,O^1′:O⁴,O^4′] hydrate], [Cu(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]·H₂O, (II), take the form of zigzag chains, with the 1,4‐benzene­di­carboxyl­ate ion acting as an amphimonodentate ligand in (I) and a bis‐bidentate ligand in (II). The Co^II ion in (I) is five‐coordinate and has a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal geometry. The Cu^II ion in (II) is in a very distorted octahedral 4+2 environment, with the octahedron elongated along the trans O—Cu—O bonds and with a trans O—Cu—O angle of only 137.22 (8)°.     

[Bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­alkane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato) complexes of nickel(II)

The structures of a series of four‐coordinate nickel(II) complexes of the form [Ni(sacsac)L] PF₆ (sacsac = pentane‐2,4‐di­thione anion; L = (Ph₂P)₂(CH₂)_n, n = 1,2,3) have beendetermined. These are [bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­methane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato‐S,S′)­nickel(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Ni(C₂₅H₂₂P₂)(C₅H₇S₂)]PF₆, [1,2‐bis­(di­phenylphosphino)­ethane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato–S,S′)­nickel(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Ni(C₂₆H₂₄P₂)(C₅H₇S₂)]PF₆, and [1,3‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­propane](pentane‐2,4‐di­thionato‐S,S′)­nickel(II) hexa­fluoro­phosphate, [Ni(C₂₇H₂₆P₂)(C₅H₇S₂)]PF₆. All have a distorted square‐planar arrangement about Ni with angles around Ni varying with the length of the hydro­carbon chain.     

A zigzag‐type one‐dimensional coordination polymer formed by (2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­di­amine)­bis­(iso­nico­tin­ato)­platinum(II) and copper nitrate

The title compound, catena‐poly­[[[tri­aqua‐2κ³O‐(2,2‐dimethyl‐1,3‐propane­di­am­ine)‐1κ²N,N′‐μ‐isonicotinato‐1:2κ²N:O‐copper(II)­plati­num(II)]‐μ‐isonicotinato‐2:1′κ²O:N] dinitrate], {[CuPt(C₆H₄NO₂)₂(C₅H₁₄N₂)(H₂O)₃](NO₃)₂}_n, obtain­ed from equimolar (dmpda)Pt^II(isonic)₂ (where dmpda is 2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­di­amine and isonic is isonicotinate) and copper(II) nitrate, has been found to be a one‐dimensional coordination polymer of the zigzag‐type.     

Diphenyl(2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐di­thiolato‐S,S′)plumbane at 295 K and diphenyl(2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐di­thiolato‐S,S′)stannane at 150 K

Molecules of di­phenyl(2‐thio­xo‐1,3‐di­thiole‐4,5‐di­thiol­ato‐S,S′)­plumbane, [Pb(C₃S₅)(C₆H₅)₂], are linked into sheets via two intermolecular Pb?S_thione interactions of 3.322 (4) and 3.827 (4) Å; the Pb centre has a distorted octahedral geometry. In contrast, mol­ecules of ­di­phenyl(2‐thio­xo‐1,3‐di­thiole‐4,5‐di­thiol­ato‐S,S′)­stannane, [Sn(C₃S₅)(C₆H₅)₂], are linked into chains via a single intermolecular Sn—S_thione interaction of 2.8174 (9) Å; the Sn centre has a distorted trigonal‐bipy­ramidal geometry.     

Tris(2,2′‐bioxazoline‐κ2N,N′)copper(II) diperchlorate and tris(2,2′‐bioxazoline‐κ2N,N′)­nickel(II) diperchlorate

In the two isomorphous title compounds, viz. tris­[2,2′‐bi(4,5‐di­hydro‐1,3‐oxazole)‐κ²N,N′]copper(II) diperchlorate, [Cu(C₆H₈N₂O₂)₃](ClO₄)₂, (I), and tris­[2,2′‐bi(4,5‐di­hydro‐1,3‐oxazole)‐κ²N,N′]­nickel(II) diperchlorate, [Ni(C₆H₈N₂O₂)₃](ClO₄)₂, (II), the M^II ions each have a distorted octahedral coordination geometry formed via six N atoms from three 2,2′‐bioxazoline ligands. For each ligand, the two five‐membered rings are nearly coplanar. It is noteworthy that the Jahn–Teller effect is stronger in (I) than in (II). The three‐dimensional supramolecular structures of (I) and (II) are formed via weak hydrogen‐bonding interactions between O atoms from per­chlorate anions and H atoms from 2,2′‐bioxazoline ligands.