Cyano­cobalt(III) complexes of penta‐ and tetra­dentate‐coordinated macrocyclic hexa­amines

The pendent‐arm macrocyclic hexa­amine trans‐6,13‐dimethyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐6,13‐diamine (L) may coordinate in tetra‐, penta‐ or hexa­dentate modes, depending on the metal ion and the synthetic procedure. We report here the crystal structures of two pseudo‐octa­hedral cobalt(III) complexes of L, namely sodium trans‐cyano­(trans‐6,13‐dimethyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐6,13‐diamine)cobalt(III) triperchlorate, Na[Co(CN)(C₁₃H₃₀N₆)](ClO₄)₃ or Na{trans‐[CoL(CN)]}(ClO₄)₃, (I), where L is coordinated as a penta­dentate ligand, and trans‐dicyano­(trans‐6,13‐dimethyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐6,13‐diamine)cobalt(III) trans‐dicyano­(trans‐6,13‐dimethyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐6,13‐diaminium)cobalt(III) tetra­perchlorate tetra­hydrate, [Co(CN)₂(C₁₄H₃₂N₆)][Co(CN)₂(C₁₄H₃₀N₆)](ClO₄)₄·4H₂O or trans‐[CoL(CN)₂]trans‐[Co(H₂L)(CN)₂](ClO₄)₄·4H₂O, (II), where the ligand binds in a tetra­dentate mode, with the remaining coordination sites being filled by C‐­bound cyano ligands. In (I), the secondary amine Co—N bond lengths lie within the range 1.944 (3)–1.969 (3) Å, while the trans influence of the cyano ligand lengthens the Co—N bond length of the coordinated primary amine [Co—N = 1.986 (3) Å]. The Co—CN bond length is 1.899 (3) Å. The complex cations in (II) are each located on centres of symmetry. The Co—N bond lengths in both cations are somewhat longer than in (I) and span a narrow range [1.972 (3)–1.982 (3) Å]. The two independent Co—CN bond lengths are similar [1.918 (4) and 1.926 (4) Å] but significantly longer than in the structure of (I), again a consequence of the trans influence of each cyano ligand.     

Three oxo complexes with a tetra­nuclear [Cu4(μ2‐Cl)6(μ4‐O)] unit

The three title compounds, namely 4‐phenyl‐1H‐imidazolium hexa‐μ₂‐chloro‐chloro‐μ₄‐oxo‐tris­(4‐phenyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN¹)­tetra­copper(II) monohydrate, (C₉H₉N₂)[Cu₄Cl₇O(C₉H₈N₂)₃]·H₂O, hexa‐μ₂‐chloro‐μ₄‐oxo‐tetra­kis­(pyridine N‐oxide‐κO)tetra­copper(II), [Cu₄Cl₆O(C₅H₅NO)₄], and hexa‐μ₂‐chloro‐tetra­kis(2‐methyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN¹)‐μ₄‐oxo‐tetra­copper(II) methanol trisolvate, [Cu₄Cl₆O(C₄H₆N₂)₄]·3CH₄O, exhibit the same Cu₄OCl₆ framework, where the O atom at the centre of an almost regular tetra­hedron bridges four copper cations at the corners. This group is in turn surrounded by a Cl₆ octa­hedron, leading to a rather globular species. This special arrangement of the Cu^II cations results in a diversity of magnetic behaviours.     

Paddlewheel dirhodium complexes bridged by para‐substituted benzoates

The dirhodium complex bis­(benzonitrile)tetra­kis[μ‐4‐(diethyl­amino)benzoato‐κ²O:O′]dirhodium(II)(Rh—Rh) benzonitrile disolvate, [Rh₂(C₁₁H₁₄NO₂)₄(C₇H₅N)₂]·2C₇H₅N, lies about an inversion centre. The dirhodium complex (methanol)tetra­kis(μ‐4‐nitro­benzoato‐κ²O:O′)(pyridine)dirhodium(II)(Rh—Rh) dichloro­methane solvate, [Rh₂(C₇H₄NO₄)₄(C₅H₅N)(CH₄O)]·CH₂Cl₂, lies in a general position in the unit cell, but the complexes dimerize around an inversion centre via O—H⋯O hydrogen bonding of the axial MeOH to a carboxyl­ate O atom. In the latter crystal structure, π–π stacking inter­actions between the bridging 4‐nitro­benzoate ligands and the axial pyridine ligand are observed between adjacent mol­ecules.     

Tetra­kis(μ2‐1,8‐naphthyridine)‐1:2κ4N:N′;3:4κ4N:N′‐bis­(μ2‐salicylato)‐1:4κ2O:O′;2:3κ2O:O′‐tetrakis­(salicylic acid)‐1κO,2κO,3κO,4κO‐tetra­silver(I)(4 Ag—Ag)

The title complex, [Ag₄(C₇H₅O₃)₂(C₈H₆N₂)₄(C₇H₆O₃)₄], lies about an inversion centre and has a unique tetra­nuclear structure consisting of four Ag^I atoms bridged by four N atoms from two 1,8‐naphthyridine (napy) ligands to form an N:N′‐bridge and four O atoms from two salicylate (SA) ligands to form an O:O′‐bridge. The Ag atoms have distorted octa­hedral coordination geometry. The centrosymmetric Ag₄ ring has Ag—Ag separations of 2.772 (2) and 3.127 (2) Å, and Ag—Ag—Ag angles of 107.70 (4) and 72.30 (4)°. All SA hydroxy groups take part in intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonding. In the crystal packing, the napy rings are oriented parallel and overlap one another. These π–π inter­actions, together with weak inter­molecular C—H⋯O contacts, stabilize the crystal structure.     

Cobalt(II) and nickel(II) complexes of quinoline‐2‐carboxyl­ate

The title complexes, trans‐di­aqua­bis­(quinoline‐2‐carboxyl­ato‐κ²N,O)­cobalt(II)–water–methanol (1/2/2), [Co(C₁₀H₆NO₂)₂(H₂O)₂]·2CH₄O·2H₂O, and trans‐di­aqua­bis­(quinoline‐2‐car­box­yl­ato‐κ²N,O)­nickel(II)–water–methanol (1/2/2), [Ni(C₁₀H₆NO₂)₂(H₂O)₂]·2CH₄O·2H₂O, are isomorphous and contain Co^II and Ni^II ions at centers of inversion. Both complexes have the same distorted octahedral coordination geometry, and each metal ion is coordinated by two quinoline N atoms, two carboxyl­ate O atoms and two water O atoms. The quinoline‐2‐carboxyl­ate ligands lie in trans positions with respect to one another, forming the equatorial plane, with the two water ligands occupying the axial positions. The complex mol­ecules are linked together by hydrogen bonding involving a series of ring patterns which include the uncoordinated water and methanol mol­ecules.     

Cobalt(II) and nickel(II) complexes of isoquinoline‐1‐carboxylate

trans‐Di­aqua­bis­(iso­quinoline‐1‐carboxyl­ato‐κ²N,O)­cobalt(II) dihydrate, [Co(C₁₀H₆NO₂)₂(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O, and trans‐di­aqua­bis­(iso­quinoline‐1‐carboxyl­ato‐κ²N,O)­nickel(II) dihydrate, [Ni(C₁₀H₆NO₂)₂(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O, contain the same isoquinoline ligand, with both metal atoms residing on a centre of symmetry and having the same distorted octahedral coordination. In the former complex, the Co—O(water) bond length in the axial direction is 2.167 (2) Å, which is longer than the Co—O(carboxylate) and Co—N bond lengths in the equatorial plane [2.055 (2) and 2.096 (2) Å, respectively]. In the latter complex, the corresponding bond lengths for Ni—O(water), Ni—O(carboxylate) and Ni—N are 2.127 (2), 2.036 (2) and 2.039 (3) Å, respectively. Both crystals are stabilized by similar stacking interactions of the ligand, and also by hydrogen bonds between the hydrate and coordinated water molecules.     

trans‐Dioxocyclam (1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecane‐2,9‐dione) dihydrate and its NiII complex

The crystal structures are reported of trans‐dioxocyclam dihydrate, C₁₀H₂₀N₄O₂·2H₂O, a structural isomer of the well known cis‐dioxocyclam, and of its novel Ni complex, (1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐2,9‐dionato‐κ⁴N)­nickel(II) dihydrate, [Ni(C₁₀H₁₈N₄O₂)]·2H₂O, the first example of a trans­ition metal complex of this ligand. Both mol­ecules lie on crystallographic centres of inversion. The free ligand has two of its N atoms turned outwards from the ring and hydrogen bonded to water mol­ecules. A major conformational change takes place in the complex in which the ligand binds in a trans tetradentate fashion, as suggested by the electronic spectrum. The nickel(II) ion is low spin, although the electronic spectrum of the complex in water indicates an equilibrium mixture of low‐spin and high‐spin species. The irreversible electrochemical oxidation of [NiL¹] (L¹ is deprotonated trans‐dioxocyclam, C₁₀H₁₈N₄O₂) in water occurs at a potential of 0.964 V [versus SHE (standard hydrogen electrode)], which is very similar to that for the Ni–cis‐dioxocyclam complex.     

Hexa­methyl­enetetra­mine–4‐nitro­catechol–water (1/2/1)

In the title adduct, 1,3,5,7‐tetra­aza­tri­cyclo[3.3.1.1^3,7]dec­ane–4‐nitro­benzene‐1,2‐diol–water (1/2/1), C₆H₁₂N₄·2C₆H₅NO₄·H₂O, the hexa­methyl­ene­tetra­mine mol­ecule acts as an acceptor of intermolecular O—H?N hydrogen‐bonding interactions from the water mol­ecule and the hydroxy groups of one of the two symmetry‐independent 4‐nitro­catechol mol­ecules. The structure is built from molecular layers which are stabilized by three intermolecular O—H?O, two intermolecular O—H?N and four intermolecular C—H?O hydrogen bonds. The layers are further interconnected by one additional intermolecular O—H?N and two intermolecular C—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

RbCrIII(C2O4)2·2H2O,Cs2Mg(C2O4)2·4H2O and Rb2CuII(C2O4)2·2H2O: three new complex oxalate hydrates

Rubidium chromium(III) dioxalate dihydrate [di­aqua­bis(μ‐oxalato)­chromium(III)­rubidium(I)], [RbCr(C₂O₄)₂(H₂O)₂], (I), and dicaesium magnesium dioxalate tetrahydrate [tetra­aqua­bis(μ‐oxalato)­magnesium(II)­dicaesium(I)], [Cs₂Mg(C₂­O₄)₂(H₂O)₄], (II), have layered structures which are new among double‐metal oxalates. In (I), the Rb and Cr atoms lie on sites with imposed 2/m symmetry and the unique water molecule lies on a mirror plane; in (II), the Mg atom lies on a twofold axis. The two non‐equivalent Cr and Mg atoms both show octahedral coordination, with a mean Cr—O distance of 1.966 Å and a mean Mg—O distance of 2.066 Å. Dirubid­ium copper(II) dioxalate dihydrate [di­aqua­bis(μ‐oxalato)­copper(II)­dirubidium(I)], [Rb₂Cu(C₂O₄)₂(H₂O)₂], (III), is also layered and is isotypic with the previously described K₂‐ and (NH₄)₂Cu^II(C₂O₄)₂·2H₂O compounds. The two non‐equivalent Cu atoms lie on inversion centres and are both (4+2)‐coordinated. Hydro­gen bonds are medium‐strong to weak in the three compounds. The oxalate groups are slightly non‐planar only in the Cs–Mg compound, (II), and are more distinctly non‐planar in the K–Cu compound, (III).     

trans‐Di­chloro‐cis‐bis(3,6‐di­methyl­carbazolyl)‐cis‐bis­(tetra­hydro­furan)­zirconium(IV) benzene sesquisolvate

In the title compound, [ZrCl₂(C₁₄H₁₂N)₂(C₄H₈O)₂]·1.5C₆H₆, the Zr atom is pseudo‐octahedral, with two Cl atoms in trans positions and two tetra­hydro­furan mol­ecules in cis positions. The two 3,6‐di­methyl­carbazolyl ligands are in cis positions and are canted with respect to one another. The two Zr—N distances are 2.1148 (18) and 2.1236 (18) Å, and the N—Zr—N angle is 95.08 (7)°. The title compound crystallizes as the benzene solvate, with one of the benzene mol­ecules positioned on an inversion center.     

Poly[di‐μ2‐methano­lato‐di‐μ2‐tetra­methoxy­borato‐disodium(I)]

In the polymeric title compound, [Na₂(C₄H₁₂BO₄)₂(CH₄O)₂]_n, the two independent sodium cations are bound by five O atoms. All the O atoms of one tetra­methoxy­borate anion bind cations, forming a tetra­meric cluster around a tetra­gonal inversion centre [Na—O = 2.2777 (18)–2.3907 (16) Å]. Two methanol O atoms bridge the two Na atoms [Na—O = 2.3590 (15)–2.4088 (18) Å] and provide the hydrogen‐bonding H atoms. The second tetra­methoxy­borate anion provides two O atoms to one Na atom [mean Na—O = 2.31 (2) Å] and two O atoms as donors for crosslinking hydrogen bonds to adjacent tetra­mers, which complete the three‐dimensional packing. The crystal was a treated as a racemic twin.     

N,N:N′,N′‐Bis(2,2'‐dihydroxy­biphen­yl‐3,3'‐dimethyl­idene)benzene‐1,2‐diamine dimeth­yl sulfoxide tetra­solvate

The title compound, 8,15,28,35‐tetra­aza­hepta­cyclo[35.3.1.1^2,6.1^17,21.1^22,26.0^9,14·0^29,34]tetraconta‐1(41),2,4,6(42),7,9,11,13,15,17,19,21(43),22,24,26(44),27,29,31,33,35,37,39‐docosaene‐41,42,43,44‐tetrol dimeth­yl sulfoxide tetra­solvate, C₄₀H₂₈N₄O₄·4C₂H₆OS, adopts a chair‐shaped C_2h symmetric conformation with crystallographically imposed inversion symmetry. Four intra­molecular hydrogen bonds are observed between phenol O and imine N atoms.     

A cyano‐bridged dinuclear 4f–3d array

A cyano‐bridged bimetallic 4f–3d complex, tri­aqua‐1κ³O‐μ‐cyano‐1:2κ²N:C‐penta­cyano‐2κ⁵C‐tetrakis(2‐pyrrolidone‐1κO)­chromium(III)­dysprosium(III) dihydrate, [CrDy(C₄H₇NO)₄(CN)₆(H₂O)₃]·2H₂O, has been prepared and characterized by X‐ray crystallographic analysis. The structure consists of a neutral cyano‐bridged Dy–Cr dimer. A hydrogen‐bonded three‐dimensional architecture is formed through N—H?O, O—H?N and O—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

Adducts of 1,1,1‐tris(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­ethane with 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)­ethane and 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)­ethene: continuously interwoven structures in three dimensions

In the adduct 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)­ethane–1,1,1‐tris(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­ethane (1/2), C₁₂H₁₂N₂·2C₂₀H₁₈O₃, the bipyridyl component lies across an inversion centre in P. The tris‐phenol mol­ecules [systematic name: 4,4′,4′′‐(ethane‐1,1,1‐triyl)­triphenol] are linked by O—H?O hydrogen bonds to form sheets built from R(38) rings, and symmetry‐related pairs of sheets are linked by the bipyridyl mol­ecules via O—H?N hydrogen bonds to form open bilayers. Each bilayer is interwoven with two adjacent bilayers, forming a continuous three‐dimensional structure. In the adduct 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)­ethene–1,1,1‐tris(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­ethane–methanol (1/1/1), C₁₂H₁₀N₂·C₂₀H₁₈O₃·CH₄O, the mol­ecules are linked by O—H?O and O—H?N hydrogen bonds into three interwoven three‐dimensional frameworks, generated by single spiral chains along [010] and [001] and a triple‐helical spiral along [100].     

A donor–acceptor compound composed of a di­nuclear zinc(II) complex of a Robson macro­cycle with 8‐methyl­quino­line

A donor–acceptor compound, di­aqua‐1κO,2κO‐[μ‐11,23‐dimethyl‐3,7,15,19‐tetra­aza­tri­cyclo­[19.3.1.1^9,13]hexacosa‐1(25),2,7,9,11,13(26),14,19,21,23‐decaene‐25,­26‐diolato‐1κ⁴N³,N⁷,O²⁵,O²⁶:­2κ⁴N¹⁵,N¹⁹,O²⁵,O²⁶]­dizinc(II) diperchlorate bis(8‐methyl­quinoline) ethanol disolvate, [Zn₂(C₂₄H₂₆N₄O₂)(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂·2C₁₀H₉N·2C₂H₆O, obtained by the reaction of a dinuclear zinc(II) complex of a Robson macrocycle (acceptor) and 8‐methyl­quinoline (donor), lies about an inversion centre and the coordination about the unique Zn atom is a distorted square pyramid. The fifth coordination site is occupied by the water mol­ecule, Zn—O = 2.016 (2) Å, and the average macrocyclic Zn—O and Zn—N distances are 2.059 (6) and 2.059 (3) Å, respectively.     

[cis‐{η2‐(Ph3PAu)2}Ph3PCr(CO)4]·THF,featuring the shortest known separation between two Au metal centres in a heteronuclear Au2M cluster

The title compound, tetra­carbonyl‐1κ⁴C‐tris­(tri­phenyl­phos­phino)‐1κP,2κP,3κP‐triangulo‐chromiumdigold(Au—Au)(2 Cr—Au) tetra­hydro­furan solvate, [Au₂Cr(C₁₈H₁₅P)₃(CO)₄]·C₄H₈O, is a stable isolobal analogue of the extremely labile [(η²‐H₂)CrL_n–1] molecular hydrogen complex (n = 6; L is a neutral ligand, e.g. CO or PPh₃), and features the shortest known separation [2.6937 (2) Å] between two Au atoms in a triangular heteronuclear metal‐cluster framework.     

A chloro(2‐pyridinecarboxaldehyde)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine)­ruthenium(II) complex

The aldehyde moiety in the title complex, chloro(2‐pyridinecarboxaldehyde‐N,O)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine‐κ³N)ruthenium(II)–chloro­(2‐pyridine­carboxyl­ic acid‐N,O)(2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine‐κ³N)­ruthenium(II)–perchlorate–chloro­form–water (1.8/0.2/2/1/1), [RuCl­(C₆H₅NO)­(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]_1.8[RuCl­(C₆H₅­NO₂)(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]_0.2­(ClO₄)₂·­CHCl₃·­H₂O, is a structural model of substrate coordination to a transfer hydrogenation catalyst. The title complex features two independent Ru^II complex cations that display very similar distorted octahedral coordination provided by the three N atoms of the 2,2′:6′,2′′‐ter­pyridine ligand, the N and O atoms of the 2‐pyridine­carbox­aldehyde (pyCHO) ligand and a chloride ligand. One of the cation sites is disordered such that the aldehyde group is replaced by a 20 (1)% contribution from a carboxyl­ic acid group (aldehyde H replaced by carboxyl O—H). Notable dimensions in the non‐disordered complex cation are Ru—N 2.034 (2) Å and Ru—O 2.079 (2) Å to the pyCHO ligand and O—C 1.239 (4) Å for the pyCHO carbonyl group.     

Comparison of two polymeric transition metal complexes with 1,4‐benzenedicarboxylate ions as bridging ligands, [Co(C8H4O4)(C12H8N2)(H2O)] and [Cu(C8H4O4)(C10H9N3)]·H2O

The title complexes, catena‐poly[[aqua(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)­cobalt(II)]‐μ‐benzene‐1,4‐di­carboxyl­ato‐κ²O¹:O⁴], [Co(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₂H₈N₂)(H₂O)], (I), and catena‐poly[[[(di‐2‐pyridyl‐κN‐amine)copper(II)]‐μ‐benzene‐1,4‐di­carboxyl­ato‐κ⁴O¹,O^1′:O⁴,O^4′] hydrate], [Cu(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]·H₂O, (II), take the form of zigzag chains, with the 1,4‐benzene­di­carboxyl­ate ion acting as an amphimonodentate ligand in (I) and a bis‐bidentate ligand in (II). The Co^II ion in (I) is five‐coordinate and has a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal geometry. The Cu^II ion in (II) is in a very distorted octahedral 4+2 environment, with the octahedron elongated along the trans O—Cu—O bonds and with a trans O—Cu—O angle of only 137.22 (8)°.     

Two tetrahydrofuran solvates of HN(SePPh2)2

The X‐ray crystal structures of P,P′‐imino­bis­(di­phenyl­seleno­phosphine) tetra­hydro­furan solvate, C₂₄H₂₁NP₂Se₂·C₄H₈O, (I), and bis­(tetra­hydro­furan) solvate, C₂₄H₂₁NP₂Se₂·2C₄H₈O, (II), have been determined; (I) has twofold crystallographic symmetry. In each compound, the O atom of one mol­ecule of tetra­hydro­furan is hydrogen bonded to the amide‐H atom of HN(SePPh₂)₂. The conformation of the Se—P—N—P—Se chains in (I), (II), and the crystal structure of the unsolvated HN(SePPh₂)₂ are different.     

Bis­(di‐μ‐acetato‐aqua{2‐[N‐ethyl‐N‐(2‐hydroxy‐4‐methyl­benzyl)­amino­methyl]‐1‐methyl­benz­imid­az­ole}­nickel)­nickel(II) tetra­hy­drate

The previously unknown title compound, tetra‐μ‐ace­tato‐1:2κ²O;1:2κ²O:O′;­2:3κ²O;­2:3κ²O:O′‐di­aqua‐1κO,3κO‐bis­(μ‐2‐{[N‐ethyl‐N‐(2‐hy­droxy‐5‐methylbenzyl)­am­ino]­methyl}‐1‐methyl‐1H‐benz­imid­az­ole)‐1κ³N³,N,O:2κO;3κ³N³,N,O:2κO‐tri­nickel(II) tetra­hy­drate, [Ni₃(C₁₈H₂₂N₃O)₂(C₂H₃O₂)₄(H₂O)₂]·­4H₂O, (I), is a centrosymmetric linear trinuclear nickel(II) complex, where the Ni atoms are in an octahedral coordination and the ligand heteroatoms act so as to model amino acid residues.