General financial market model defined by a liquidation value process

Financial market models defined by a liquidation value process generalize the conic models of Schachermayer and Kabanov where the transaction costs are proportional to the exchanged volumes of traded assets. The solvency set of all portfolio positions that can be liquidated without any debt is not necessary convex, e.g. in presence of proportional transaction costs and fixed costs. Therefore, the classical duality principle based on the Hahn–Banach separation theorem is not appropriate to characterize the prices super hedging a contingent claim. Using an alternative method based on the concepts of essential supremum and maximum, we provide a characterization of European and American contingent claim prices under the absence of arbitrage opportunity of the second kind.     

Asymptotic arbitrage in large financial markets with friction

In the modern version of arbitrage pricing theory suggested by Kabanov and Kramkov the fundamental financially meaningful concept is an asymptotic arbitrage. The ??real world?? large market is represented by a sequence of ??models?? and, though each of them is arbitrage free, investors may obtain non-risky profits in the limit. Mathematically, absence of the asymptotic arbitrage is expressed as contiguity of envelopes of the sets of equivalent martingale measures and objective probabilities. The classical theory deals with frictionless markets. In the present paper we extend it to markets with transaction costs. Assuming that each model admits consistent price systems, we relate them with families of probability measures and consider their upper and lower envelopes. The main result concerns the necessary and sufficient conditions for absence of asymptotic arbitrage opportunities of the first and second kinds expressed in terms of contiguity. We provide also more specific conditions involving Hellinger processes and give applications to particular models of large financial markets.     

Strong asymptotic arbitrage in the large fractional binary market

We study, from the perspective of large financial markets, the asymptotic arbitrage (AA) opportunities in a sequence of binary markets approximating the fractional Black–Scholes model. This approximating sequence was introduced by Sottinen and named fractional binary market. The large financial market under consideration does not satisfy the standard assumptions of the theory of AA. For this reason, we follow a constructive approach to show first that a strong AA (SAA) exists in the frictionless case. Indeed, with the help of an appropriate version of the law of large numbers and a stopping time procedure, we construct a sequence of self-financing trading strategies leading to the desired result. Next, we introduce, in each small market, proportional transaction costs, and we show that a slight modification of the previous trading strategies leads to a SAA when the transaction costs converge fast enough to 0.     

Optimal Consumption Portfolio and No-Arbitrage with Nonproportional Transaction Costs

In this paper we consider a finite-state financial market with non-proportional transaction cost and bid-ask spreads. The transaction cost consists of two parts: a fixed cost and a proportional cost to the size of transaction. We show that the existence of an optimal consumption policy implies that the market has no strong arbitrage; the opposite, however, is not true, i.e., no strong arbitrage does not imply the existence of an optimal consumption policy. This is in sharp contrast with the case of proportional transaction cost and other cases reported in the literature, where no strong arbitrage is equivalent to the existence of an optimal consumption policy. We also study the relationship between weak arbitrage and strong arbitrage. Different from the market with proportional transaction cost, we find that these two forms of arbitrage are equivalent unless the fixed cost is zero. A necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of an optimal consumption policy is also obtained. Supported by CAS, NSFC, RGC of Hong Kong and NSF under Grant No. DMI-0196084 and DMI-0200306.     

Introduction to convex optimization in financial markets

Convexity arises naturally in financial risk management. In risk preferences concerning random cash-flows, convexity corresponds to the fundamental diversification principle. Convexity is a basic property also of budget constraints both in classical linear models as well as in more realistic models with transaction costs and constraints. Moreover, modern securities markets are based on trading protocols that result in convex trading costs. The first part of this paper gives an introduction to certain basic concepts and principles of financial risk management in simple optimization terms. The second part reviews some convex optimization techniques used in mathematical and numerical analysis of financial optimization problems.     

Convex duality in optimal investment under illiquidity

We study the problem of optimal investment by embedding it in the general conjugate duality framework of convex analysis. This allows for various extensions to classical models of liquid markets. In particular, we obtain a dual representation for the optimum value function in the presence of portfolio constraints and nonlinear trading costs that are encountered e.g. in modern limit order markets. The optimization problem is parameterized by a sequence of financial claims. Such a parameterization is essential in markets without a numeraire asset when pricing swap contracts and other financial products with multiple payout dates. In the special case of perfectly liquid markets or markets with proportional transaction costs, we recover well-known dual expressions in terms of martingale measures.     

摩擦市场的最优消费-投资组合选择

本文研究摩擦市场中的最优消费-投资组合选择问题.当金融资产和自然状态个数为有限个以及摩擦局限于成比例的交易费时,可用原始市场或适当转换了的市场的无套利性来刻画最优消费-投资组合策略的存在性或充要条件.     

Stochastic measures of arbitrage

Empirical research has provided evidence supporting the existence of arbitrage opportunities in real financial markets although market imperfections are often the main reason to explain these empirical deviations. Consequently, recent literature has turned the attention to imperfect markets in order to extend the most significant results on asset pricing. This paper develops several stochastic measures providing relative arbitrage earnings available in a financial market. The measures allow us to take into account different type of frictions. They are introduced by means of several dual pairs of vector optimization problems. Primal problems permit us to characterize the arbitrage absence even in an imperfect market and they also provide optimal arbitrage portfolios if the arbitrage absence fails. Dual ones allow us to extend the risk-neutral valuation methodology for imperfect and noarbitrage free markets and provide new interpretations for the measures in terms of “frictions effect” or “committed errors” in the valuation process. Partially funded by Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (ref: CAM 07T/0027/2000) and Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (ref: BEC2000-1388-C04)     

摩擦市场的利率期限结构的无套利分析

本文用无套利方法分析有摩擦金融市场中利率的期限结构.对存在有限个债券和离散有限个到期日以及存在成比例的交易费、买卖差价、税赋这三种摩擦的金融市场,引入了相容期限结构的概念,给出了相容期限结构和套利机会的存在性结果或充要条件及它们的识别与计算方法.     

Explicit characterization of the super-replication strategy in financial markets with partial transaction costs

We consider a continuous time multivariate financial market with proportional transaction costs and study the problem of finding the minimal initial capital needed to hedge, without risk, European-type contingent claims. The model is similar to the one considered in Bouchard and Touzi [B. Bouchard, N. Touzi, Explicit solution of the multivariate super-replication problem under transaction costs, The Annals of Applied Probability 10 (3) (2000) 685–708] except that some of the assets can be exchanged freely, i.e. without paying transaction costs. In this context, we generalize the result of the above paper and prove that the super-replication price is given by the cost of the cheapest hedging strategy in which the number of non-freely exchangeable assets is kept constant over time. Our proof relies on the introduction of a new auxiliary control problem whose value function can be interpreted as the super-hedging price in a model with unbounded stochastic volatility (in the directions where transaction costs are non-zero). In particular, it confirms the usual intuition that transaction costs play a similar role to stochastic volatility.     

Optimal financing and dividend control of the insurance company with fixed and proportional transaction costs

We consider the optimal financing and dividend control problem of the insurance company with fixed and proportional transaction costs. The management of the company controls the reinsurance rate, dividends payout as well as the equity issuance process to maximize the expected present value of the dividends payout minus the equity issuance until the time of bankruptcy. This is the first time that the financing process in an insurance model with two kinds of transaction costs, which come from real financial market has been considered. We solve the mixed classical-impulse control problem by constructing two categories of suboptimal models, one is the classical model without equity issuance, the other never goes bankrupt by equity issuance.     

Equivalent martingale measures for large financial markets in discrete time

We show that in a discrete-time large financial market the absence of certain asymptotic arbitrage opportunities is equivalent to the existence of martingale measures in a strong sense. We also consider the Arbitrage Pricing Model with stable random variables where we are able to give explicit necessary and sufficient conditions using market parameters.     

Efficiency analysis, shortage functions, arbitrage, and martingales

This paper shows that standard tools of efficiency analysis, directional distance functions, can be used to characterize the investment-returns technology. That ability to characterize the investment-returns technology and fundamental duality relationships imply that directional distance functions can be used to detect the presence of an arbitrage, to value financial assets in the absence of an arbitrage lying in the span of the market and to place bounds on the no-arbitrage values of assets lying outside the span of the market.     

Valuation of European options in the market with daily price limit

A valuation problem of the European style contingent claim in the market with daily price movement limit is studied. Unlike the one leading to the well known Black-Scholes formula, this problem depicts considerable conceptual difficulty and anomaly created by the presence of various arbitrage opportunities inherently built in the model due to the daily price movement limit. The presence of arbitrage makes it go against the grain of the well established arbitrage pricing theory. In this paper, how these complications arise are discussed and then a valuation approach devised, which is called the ‘vanishing transaction cost technique,’ of getting around the difficulty.     

Mean‐Reverting Market Model: Speculative Opportunities and Non‐Arbitrage

The paper studies arbitrage opportunities and possible speculative opportunities for diffusion mean‐reverting market models. It is shown that the Novikov condition is satisfied for any time interval and for any set of parameters. It is non‐trivial because the appreciation rate has Gaussian distribution converging to a stationary limit. It follows that the mean‐reverting model is arbitrage‐free for any finite time interval. Further, it is shown that this model still allows some speculative opportunities: a gain for a wide enough set of expected utilities can be achieved for a strategy that does not require any hypothesis on market parameters and does not use estimation of these parameters.     

有交易费的无套利资产组合优化性质

针对所给出的有交易费的资产过程模型，引入了资产折算函数以刻划套期保值和套利机会，并利用辅助鞅和凸分析的对偶方法，讨论了该模型下基于无套利分析的资产组合优化可达性的一些性质．     

有交易费市场中套利问题的注记

对有交易费的资产模型,本文引入了市场有套利机会的一般定义,并利用辅助鞅和资产折算函数方法,讨论了无套利市场的基本性质,即在可允许投资策略下市场不存在套利机会.     

On the pricing of American contingent claims under transaction costs and multiple risky assets

This paper addresses the hedging problem of American Contingents Claims (ACCs) in the framework of continuous-time Itô models for financial market. The special feature of this paper is that in the financial market the investor has to face fixed and proportional transaction costs when trading multiple risky assets. By using the auxiliary martingale approach and extending the results of Cvitanic and Karatzas [Cvitanic J, Karatzas I. Hedging and portfolio optimization under transaction costs: a martingale approach. Math Finance 1996;6:135–65] on pricing European contingent with transaction costs in the single-stock market, an arbitrage-free interval [h_low, h_up] is identified, and the end points are characterized by auxiliary martingales and stopping times in terms of auxiliary stochastic control problems. Here h_up and h_low are so-called the upper hedging price and the lower hedging price.     

股票价格遵循几何分式Brown运动的期权定价

讨论了股票价格过程遵循几何分式B row n运动的欧式期权定价.由于该过程存在套利机会使得传统的期权定价方法(如资本资产定价模型(CAPM),套利定价模型(APT),动态均衡定价理论(DEPT))不可能对该期权定价.利用保险精算定价法,在对市场无其它任何假设条件下,获得了欧式期权的定价公式.并讨论了在有效期内股票支付已知红利和红利率的推广公式.     

Pricing and hedging in a single period market with random interval valued assets

In this article, a new financial market model, in which securities have random interval valued payoffs, is proposed. As an extension of traditional random market model, some concepts, such as robust arbitrage opportunities, risk-neutral pricing measures and robust replicative strategies, are given and discussed parallel to those in traditional market analysis. With these new concepts, problems of pricing and hedging are analyzed. It is shown that the requirement of no robust arbitrage opportunities is equivalent to the existence of risk-neutral pricing measures. Taking no robust arbitrage as the valuation principle, the problem of pricing a contingent claim with random interval valued payoff is discussed. All no robust arbitrage prices of the claim form an interval, whose endpoints can be got from the risk-neutral pricing measures or from robust replicative strategies.