Lateralization of bands of noise and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones: effects of spectral locus and bandwidth

Lateralization of narrow bands of noise was investigated while varying interaural temporal disparity (ITD), center frequency, and bandwidth, utilizing an acoustic pointing task. Stimuli were narrow bands of noise centered at octave intervals between 500 Hz and 4 kHz with bandwidths ranging from 50-400 Hz. In a second experiment, lateralization for bands of noise and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones, whose spectral content was constrained to be no lower than 3.8 kHz, was assessed. Overall, relatively large extents of laterality were obtained from all four listeners for ITDs of low-frequency bands of noise. Increasing the bandwidth of these noises did not yield consistent changes in the extent of laterality across ITDs and listeners. Most targets centered at high frequencies were lateralized near the midline. However, three of the four listeners did exhibit rather large displacements of the intracranial image when the bandwidth of the high-frequency noises was 400 Hz or greater. Interestingly, ITDs within high-frequency SAM tones were relatively ineffective. Thus, it appears that ITDs of relatively wide-band, high-frequency stimuli can mediate rather substantial extents of laterality. However, these effects are highly listener-dependent.     

Lateralization of low-frequency tones and narrow bands of noise

It is well known and universally accepted that people's ability to use ongoing interaural temporal disparities conveyed via pure tones is limited to frequencies below 1600 Hz. We wish to determine if this limitation is the result of the constant amplitude and periodic axis-crossings which characterize pure tones. To this end, an acoustic pointing task was employed in which listeners varied the interaural intensitive difference of a 500-Hz narrow-band noise (the pointer) so that the position of its intracranial image matched that of a second, experimenter-controlled stimulus (the target). Targets were either pure tones or narrow bands of noise (50 or 100 Hz wide). The narrow bands of noise were delayed interaurally in two distinct manners: Either the entire waveform or only the carrier was delayed. In the latter case, the envelopes and phase-functions of the bands of noise were identical interaurally. This resulted in noises which resemble the pure tone case in that the interaural delay is manifested as a constant phase-shift and resemble ordinary noises in that the envelope and phase are random functions of time. Surprisingly, it appears that all three targets were lateralized virtually identically regardless of frequency or bandwidth. Apparently, the dynamically changing envelopes and phases did not affect the listeners' use of interaural temporal disparities in any discernible fashion.     

Lateralization of complex binaural stimuli: a weighted-image model

This article describes a new model that predicts the subjective lateral position of bandpass stimuli. It is assumed, as in other models, that stimuli are bandpass filtered and rectified, and that the rectified outputs of filters with matching center frequencies undergo interaural cross correlation. The model specifies and utilizes the shape and location of assumed patterns of neural activity that describe the cross-correlation function. Individual modes of this function receive greater weighting if they are straighter (describing consistent interaural delay over frequency) and/or more central (describing interaural delays of smaller magnitude). This weighting of straightness and centrality is used by the model to predict the perceived laterality of several types of low-frequency bandpass stimuli with interaural time delays and/or phase shifts, including bandpass noise, amplitude-modulated stimuli with time-delayed envelopes, and bandpass-filtered clicks. This model is compared to other theories that describe lateralization in terms of the relative contributions of information in the envelopes and fine structures of binaural stimuli.     

Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. II. Brief duration noises

Listeners detected a small amount of interaural incoherence in reproducible noises with narrow bandwidths and a center frequency of 500 Hz. The durations of the noise stimuli were 100, 50, or 25 ms, and every one of the noises had the same value of interaural coherence, namely 0.992. When the nominal noise bandwidth was 14 Hz, the ability to detect incoherence was found to depend strongly on the size of the fluctuations in interaural phase and level for durations of 100 and 50 ms. For the duration of 25 ms, performance did not appear to depend entirely on fluctuations. Instead, listeners sometimes recognized incoherence on the basis of laterality. However, when the nominal bandwidth was doubled, leading to a greater number of fluctuations, detection performance at 25 ms resembled that at 50 ms for the smaller bandwidth. It is concluded that the detection of a small amount of interaural incoherence is mediated by fluctuations in phase and level for brief stimulus durations, so long as such fluctuations exist physically. This conclusion presents a promising alternative to models of binaural detection that are based on the short-term cross-correlation in the stimulus.     

The lateralization of simple dichotic pitches

A "simple" dichotic pitch arises when a single narrow band possesses a different interaural configuration from a surrounding broadband noise whose interaural configuration is uniform and correlated. Such pitches were created by interaurally decorrelating a narrow band (experiment 1) or by giving a narrow band a different interaural time difference from the noise (experiment 2). Using an adaptive forced-choice procedure, listeners adjusted the interaural intensity difference of "pointers" to match their lateralization to that of the dichotic pitches. The primary determinants of lateralization were the interaural configuration of the broadband noise (experiment 1), the center frequency of the narrow band (experiment 1), and its interaural configuration (experiment 2). The ability of two computational models to predict these results was evaluated. A version of the central-spectrum model [J. Raatgever and F. A. Bilsen, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80, 429-441 (1986)] incorporating realistic frequency selectivity accounted for the main results of experiment 1 but not experiment 2. A new "reconstruction-comparison" model accounted for the main results of both experiments. To accommodate the variables shown to influence lateralization, this model segregates evidence of the dichotic pitch from the noise, reconstructs the cross-correlogram of the noise, and compares it with the cross-correlogram of the original stimulus.     

Sound segregation based on temporal envelope structure and binaural cues

The ability to segregate two spectrally and temporally overlapping signals based on differences in temporal envelope structure and binaural cues was investigated. Signals were a harmonic tone complex (HTC) with 20 Hz fundamental frequency and a bandpass noise (BPN). Both signals had interaural differences of the same absolute value, but with opposite signs to establish lateralization to different sides of the medial plane, such that their combination yielded two different spatial configurations. As an indication for segregation ability, threshold interaural time and level differences were measured for discrimination between these spatial configurations. Discrimination based on interaural level differences was good, although absolute thresholds depended on signal bandwidth and center frequency. Discrimination based on interaural time differences required the signals' temporal envelope structures to be sufficiently different. Long-term interaural cross-correlation patterns or long-term averaged patterns after equalization-cancellation of the combined signals did not provide information for the discrimination. The binaural system must, therefore, have been capable of processing changes in interaural time differences within the period of the harmonic tone complex, suggesting that monaural information from the temporal envelopes influences the use of binaural information in the perceptual organization of signal components.     

On the detection of dispersion in the head-related transfer function

Because of dispersion in head-related transfer functions (HRTFs), the interaural time difference (ITD) varies with frequency. This physical effect ought to have consequences for the size or shape of the auditory image of broadband noise because different frequency regions of the noise have different ITDs. However, virtual reality experiments suggest that human listeners are insensitive to head-related dispersion. The experiments of this article test that suggestion by experiments that isolate dispersion from amplitude effects in the HRTF and attempt to optimize the opportunity for detecting it. Nevertheless, the experiments find that the only effect of dispersion is to shift the lateralization of the auditory image. This negative result is explained in terms of the cross-correlation function for head-dispersed noise. Although the broad-band cross-correlation function differs considerably from 1.0, the cross-correlation functions within bands characteristic of auditory filters do not. A detailed study of the lateralization shifts show that the experimental shifts can be successfully calculated as an average of stimulus ITDs as weighted by Raatgever's frequency-weighting function (Thesis, Delft, The Netherlands, 1980).     

Lateralization of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones: effects of spectral locus and temporal variation

It has long been recognized that listeners are sensitive to interaural temporal disparities (ITDs) of low-frequency (i.e., below 1600 Hz) stimuli. Within the last three decades, it has often been demonstrated that listeners are also sensitive to ITDs within the envelope of high-frequency, complex stimuli. Because these studies, for the most part, employed discrimination tasks, few data exist concerning the extent of laterality produced by ITDs as a function of the spectral locus of the stimulus. To this end, we employed an acoustic "pointing" task in which listeners varied the interaural intensity difference of a 500-Hz narrow-band noise (the pointer) so that it matched the intracranial position of a second, experimenter-controlled stimulus (the target). Targets were sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones centered on 500 Hz, 1, 2, 3, or 4 kHz and modulated at rates ranging from 50 to 800 Hz. Targets were presented with either the entire waveform delayed or with only the envelope delayed. Our results suggest that: (1) for low-frequency targets, lateralization is influenced by ITDs in the envelope but is dominated by ITDs in the fine structure; (2) for high-frequency targets, envelope-based delays produce displacements of the acoustic images which are affected greatly by the rate of modulation; rather large extents of laterality could be produced with high rates of modulation; these data are consistent with those obtained previously in discrimination experiments; (3) for low rates of modulation (e.g., 100 Hz), delays of the entire waveform (both envelope and fine structure) produce much greater displacements of the acoustic image for low-frequency than for high-frequency targets (where fine-structure-based cues are not utilizable); (4) there appear to be no consistent relations among extent of laterality, rate of modulation, and the frequency of the carrier within and across listeners.     

Lateralization of low-frequency tones: relative potency of gating and ongoing interaural delays.

Several types of interaural delay can affect the lateral position of binaural signals. Delays can occur within the gating (onset and/or offset) or ongoing portions of the signal, or both. Extent of laterality produced by each of these delays was measured for low-frequency tones with an acoustic pointing task. Relative potency was assessed by presenting the delays singly or in combinations (where the types of delay were consistent or in opposition). Rise/decay time, duration, and frequency of the tonal targets were also varied. The major finding was that ongoing delays were much more potent than gating delays in determining extent of laterality. Gating delays were most effective when the interaural phase of the ongoing portion of the tones was more or less ambiguous with respect to which ear was leading. Many of our findings are qualitatively well described by considering properties of patterns of activity produced within a cross-correlation network by such interaurally delayed signals.     

Lateralization and detection of pulse trains with alternating interaural time delays

The effect of onset interaural time differences (ITDs) on lateralization and detection was investigated for broadband pulse trains 250 ms long with a binaural fundamental frequency of 250 Hz. Within each train, ITDs of successive binaural pulse pairs alternated between two of three values (0 micros, 500 micros left-leading, and 500 micros right-leading) or were invariant. For the alternating conditions, the experimental manipulation was the choice of which of two ITDs was presented first (i.e., at stimulus onset). Lateralization, which was estimated using a broadband noise pointer with a listener adjustable interaural delay, was determined largely by the onset ITD. However, detection thresholds for the signals in left-leading or diotic continuous broadband noise were not affected by where the signals were lateralized. A quantitative analysis suggested that binaural masked thresholds for the pulse trains were well accounted for by the level and phase of harmonic components at 500 and 750 Hz. Detection thresholds obtained for brief stimuli (two binaural pulse or noise burst pairs) were also independent of which of two ITDs was presented first. The control of lateralization by onset cues appears to be based on mechanisms not essential for binaural detection.     

Binaural suppression of nonechoes.

A brief diotic conditioner has been shown to effectively disrupt lateralization of a brief dichotic probe presented after a short interval (4-10 ms, onset to onset) with an interaural time delay that is clearly discriminable in the absence of the conditioner [e.g., P. M. Zurek, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1750-1757 (1980)], even when the conditioner and the probe are different sounds [P. L. Divenyi and J. Blauert, in Auditory Processing of Complex Sounds, edited by W. A. Yost and C. S. Watson (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987), pp. 146-155]. The present experiments investigated lateralization suppression of a narrow-band dichotic probe centered at 2 kHz by a narrow-band diotic conditioner, in situations in which the probe could not be regarded as an echo of the conditioner. In one case, the conditioner was identical to the probe but was presented in opposite phase; in other conditions, the center frequency of the conditioner was different, with the center frequency to bandwidth ratio remaining constant. The effects of frequency and temporal separation between the conditioner and the probe on the suppression of the lateralization of the probe were explored. Suppression of lateralization was measured as the increase in the just-noticeable interaural time difference (jnd), with respect to the interaural time jnd obtained for the probe alone. Low-frequency (0.5 to 1.5 kHz) conditioners were more effective in suppressing the lateralization of the probe than those at or above the probe frequency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Gap detection in multiple narrow bands of noise as a function of spectral configuration.

This study sought to differentiate between the effect of stimulus bandwidth and the effect of number of activated auditory channels on gap detection in narrow bands of noise. The aim was to clarify the role of across-frequency analysis in temporal processing. Experiment 1 established that when total noise bandwidth is held constant at 100 Hz, gap detection improves as stimulus energy is distributed to both lower and higher frequencies. Experiment 2a showed that the effect was smaller, or was absent, when the cumulative stimulus bandwidth was increased from 100 to 200 Hz. Experiment 2b confirmed that the benefit of spectral dispersion for the narrower cumulative bandwidth also held for a higher frequency region. The results suggest that in conditions where the cumulative stimulus bandwidth is relatively narrow and, concomitantly, gap detection is relatively poor, there is an advantage in dispersing the stimulus across a number of auditory channels. The advantage for the distribution of energy across a range of auditory channels may be offset when the spectral spacing of bands exceeds a critical value.     

A central spectrum theory of binaural processing. Evidence from dichotic pitch

A theory is presented that describes the binaural processing of interaural time or phase differences. It is an elaboration of the central spectrum concept for the explanation of dichotic pitch phenomena [F. A. Bilsen, "Pitch of noise signals: Evidence for a 'central spectrum'," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 150-161 (1977)]. The generation is postulated for central activity patterns (CAP) due to binaural interaction. From these CAPs the central processor selects specific spectral information that constitutes the information for lateralization, dichotic pitch, binaural masking, etc. Here, a strategy is assumed to be based on central spectra (CS) rather than on interaural cross correlation. For the calculation of the central activity patterns a number of assumptions have been introduced. The peripheral filters are supposed to be infinitesimally narrow. The analog filter outputs from corresponding filters at both ears are thought to interact by means of a linear delay-and-add mechanism. The squared output (power) of such a binaural (addition) network constitutes the CAP. The theory has been tested with lateralization and BMLD measurements using dichotic stimulus configurations characteristic of the perception of dichotic pitch. The predictions of the model concerning the pitch and the lateralization of the pitch images as well as the BMLD patterns for this kind of stimuli are confirmed.     

Thresholds for segregating a narrow-band from a broadband noise based on interaural phase and level differences

Either an interaural phase shift or level difference was introduced to a narrow section of broadband noise in order to measure the acuity of the binaural system to segregate a narrowband from a broadband stimulus. Listeners were asked to indicate whether this dichotic noise or a totally diotic noise was presented in a single-interval procedure. Thresholds for interaural phase and level differences were estimated from four point psychometric functions. These thresholds were determined for three bandwidths of interaurally altered noise (2, 10, and 100 Hz) centered at four center frequencies (200, 500, 1000, and 1600 Hz). Thresholds were lowest when the interaurally altered band of noise was centered at 500 Hz, and thresholds increased as the bandwidth of the interaurally altered noise decreased. Performance did not exceed 75% correct when either an interaural phase shift (180 degrees) or interaural level difference (50 dB) was introduced to a 100 Hz band of noise centered at frequencies higher than 1600 Hz. In a second set of conditions, performance was measured when both an interaural phase shift and level difference were presented in a 10-Hz-wide band of noise centered at 500 Hz. A version of the Durlach E-C model was able to account for a great deal of the data. The results are discussed in terms of the Huggins dichotic pitch.     

Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences

The interaural level difference (ILD) is an important cue for the localization of sound sources. Just noticeable differences (JND) in ILD were measured in 12 normal hearing subjects for uncorrelated noise bands with a bandwidth of 13 octave and a different center frequency in both ears. In one ear the center frequency was either 250, 500, 1000, or 4000 Hz. In the other ear, a frequency shift of 0, 16, 13, or 1 octave was introduced. JNDs in ILD for unshifted, uncorrelated noise bands of 13 octave width were 2.6, 2.6, 2.5, and 1.4 dB for 250, 500, 1000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. Averaged over all shifts, JNDs decreased significantly with increasing frequency. For the shifted conditions, JNDs increased significantly with increasing shift. Performance on average worsened by 0.5, 0.9, and 1.5 dB for shifts of 16, 13, and 1 octave. Though performance decreases, the just noticeable ILDs for the shifted conditions were still in a range usable for lateralization. This has implications for signal processing algorithms for bilateral bimodal hearing instruments and the fitting of bilateral cochlear implants.     

Binaural detection at high frequencies with time-delayed waveforms

Recent research has demonstrated that the binaural system can utilize ongoing interaural time differences for lateralization at high frequencies as well as at low frequencies. The requirement is that the signal be complex so that the time difference appears as a delay in the envelope of the waveform at one ear. Reported here are several masking experiments that examine detection performance with time-delayed signals or maskers. In the first experiment, the signal was a 50-Hz band of noise centered at 4000 Hz that was time delayed by different amounts on different blocks of trials; the masker was similar band of noise, presented diotically. Large masking-level differences (MLDs) were obtained for some values of time delay, but the MLDs did not increase monotonically within time delay as they should were envelope time delay the basis for detection performance. Subsequent experiments in which the masker was time delayed and the signal was a diotic, high-frequency tone, revealed that detectability follows the autocorrelation function, and that MLDs as large as 24 dB can be obtained at 4000 Hz at time delays corresponding to negative values in the autocorrelation function. Examination of the signal-plus masker waveforms in these conditions reveals that ongoing interaural differences in level and cycle-by-cycle time exist in those conditions that yield MLDs. Since the time differences are small by usual standards, the basis for detection performance in these conditions appears to be the ongoing interaural level differences. In a final experiment, lateralization performance was measured for a time-delayed, complex waveform in the presence of maskers of various intensities. The results show that subjects are able to extract information about the time delay in the envelope even when the signal is added to a masker of equal intensity or greater. Thus, at the small signal-to-noise ratios used in our detection experiments, extraction of envelope time information was impossible, but also unnecessary, for detection was accomplished on the basis of another cue--most likely the ongoing interaural level differences.     

Monaural envelope correlation perception, revisited: effects of bandwidth, frequency separation, duration, and relative level of the noise bands

This article presents the results of two experiments investigating performance on a monaural envelope correlation discrimination task. Subjects were asked to discriminate pairs of noise bands that had identical envelopes (referred to as correlated stimuli) from pairs of noise bands that had envelopes which were independent (uncorrelated stimuli). In the first experiment, a number of stimulus parameters were varied: the center frequency of the lower frequency noise band in a pair, f1; the frequency separation between component noise bands; the duration of the stimuli; and the bandwidth of the component noise bands. For a long stimulus duration (500 ms) and a relatively wide bandwidth (100 Hz), subjects could easily discriminate correlated from uncorrelated stimuli for a wide range of frequency separations between the component noise bands. This was true both when f1 was 350 Hz, and when f1 was 2500 Hz. In each case, narrowing the bandwidth to 25 Hz, or shortening the duration to 100 ms, or both, made the task more difficult, but not impossible. In the second experiment, the level of the higher frequency noise band in a pair was varied. Performance did not decrease monotonically as the level of this band was decreased below the level of the other band, and only showed marked impairment when the level of the higher frequency band was at least 60 dB below that of the lower frequency band. The pattern of results in these two experiments is different from that which is obtained when the same stimulus parameters are varied in experiments investigating comodulation masking release (CMR). This suggests that the mechanisms underlying CMR and those underlying the discrimination of envelope correlation are not identical.     

利用自相关函数和双耳自相关函数分析对交通噪声特征参量的提取~

对实地双通道测量获得的道路交通噪声和铁路噪声信号样本进行了自相关函数和双耳自相关函数(Interaural CrossCorrelation Function)的分析。进而通过对噪声样本时间因子和空间因子的相关性分析、主成分分析和主观评价实验,得到了3个铁路噪声源特征参量物理因子和4个道路交通噪声源特征参量物理因子。发现与传统的声压级测量相比,表征声音信号时间特性和空间特性的这7个物理量可以更全面、准确地表征交通噪声的特性。在对道路噪声进行测量或分析时,掌握与声源视觉宽度和音调感相对应的物理因子以及双耳时延和初始能量,就可获悉与人的主观评价相一致的道路交通噪声特征信息;对铁路噪声而言,掌握与声源视觉宽度相对应的物理因子以及双耳时延和声音的重复性特征,就可以得到与入主观评价相一致的铁路噪声特征信息。综合道路噪声特征参量和铁路噪声特征参量可以发现,双耳时延和与声源视觉宽度相对应的物理因子是与人的主观反应最为一致的主成分指标,说明噪声中决定人的评价的最主要的因素是代表空间特征的信号因子。     

Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. III. Narrowband experiments and binaural models

In the first two articles of this series, reproducible noises with a fixed value of interaural coherence (0.992) were used to study the human ability to detect interaural incoherence. It was found that incoherence detection is strongly correlated with fluctuations in interaural differences, especially for narrow noise bandwidths, but it remained unclear what function of the fluctuations best agrees with detection data. In the present article, ten different binaural models were tested against detection data for 14- and 108-Hz bandwidths. These models included different types of binaural processing: independent-interaural-phase-difference/interaural-level-difference, lateral-position, and short-term cross-correlation. Several preprocessing transformations of the interaural differences were incorporated: compression of binaural cues, temporal averaging, and envelope weighting. For the 14-Hz bandwidth data, the most successful model postulated that incoherence is detected via fluctuations of interaural phase and interaural level processed by independent centers. That model correlated with detectability at r=0.87. That model proved to be more successful than short-term cross-correlation models incorporating standard physiologically-based model features (r=0.78). For the 108-Hz bandwidth data, detection performance varied much less among different waveforms, and the data were less able to distinguish between models.     

Binaural modulation masking

Modulation thresholds were measured in three subjects for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) wideband noise (the signal) in the presence of a second amplitude-modulated wideband noise (the masker). In monaural conditions (Mm-Sm) masker and signal were presented to only one ear; in binaural conditions (M0-S pi) the masker was presented diotically while the phase of modulation of the SAM noise signal was inverted in one ear relative to the other. In experiment 1 masker modulation frequency (fm) was fixed at 16 Hz, and signal modulation frequency (fs) was varied from 2-512 Hz. For monaural presentation, masking generally decreased as fs diverged from fm, although there was a secondary increase in masking for very low signal modulation frequencies, as reported previously [Bacon and Grantham, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 2575-2580 (1989)]. The binaural masking patterns did not show this low-frequency upturn: binaural thresholds continued to improve as fs decreased from 16 to 2 Hz. Thus, comparing masked monaural and masked binaural thresholds, there was an average binaural advantage, or masking-level difference (MLD) of 9.4 dB at fs = 2 Hz and 5.3 dB at fs = 4 Hz. In addition, there were positive MLDs for the on-frequency condition (fm = fs = 16 Hz: average MLD = 4.4 dB) and for the highest signal frequency tested (fs = 512 Hz: average MLD = 7.3 dB). In experiment 2 the signal was a SAM noise (fs = 16 Hz), and the masker was a wideband noise, amplitude-modulated by a narrow band of noise centered at fs. There was no effect on monaural or binaural thresholds as masker modulator bandwidth was varied from 4 to 20 Hz (the average MLD remained constant at 8.0 dB), which suggests that the observed "tuning" for modulation may be based on temporal pattern discrimination and not on a critical-band-like filtering mechanism. In a final condition the masker modulator was a 10-Hz-wide band of noise centered at the 64-Hz signal modulation frequency. The average MLD in this case was 7.4 dB. The results are discussed in terms of various binaural capacities that probably play a role in binaural release from modulation masking, including detection of varying interaural intensity differences (IIDs) and discrimination of interaural correlation.