Oxidative Coupling of Ge94‐ Zintl Anions ‐ Hexagonal Rod Packing of Linear [Ge9=Ge9=Ge9=Ge9]8‐

The compound [K(18‐crown‐6)]₈[Ge₉=Ge₉=Ge₉=Ge₉] ˙ 8en ( 1 ) featuring a [Ge₉=Ge₉=Ge₉=Ge₉]^8‐cluster anion was synthesized from K₄Ge₉ for the first time. The X‐ray single crystal analysis shows that, in many respects such as bond connection and packing style, compound 1 is quite different from the previously reported compounds [Rb(18‐crown‐6)]₈[Ge₉=Ge₉=Ge₉=Ge₉] ˙ 2en ( 2 ) and [Rb(18‐crown‐6)]₈[Ge₉=Ge₉=Ge₉=Ge₉] ˙ 6en ( 3 ). Crystal packing of 1 gives strong indications that the highly charged nano‐rods self assembly in a hexagonal rod packing.     

Total Synthesis of Trioxacarcin DC‐45‐A2

An enantioselective total synthesis of trioxacarcin DC‐45‐A2 ( 1 ) featuring a novel Lewis acid‐induced cascade rearrangement of epoxyketone 6 to forge the polyoxygenated 2,7‐dioxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane core of the molecule is described.     

σ‐Aromaticity‐Induced Stabilization of Heterometallic Supertetrahedral Clusters [Zn6Ge16]4− and [Cd6Ge16]4−

In this work, the largest heterometallic supertetrahedral clusters, [Zn₆Ge₁₆]^4? and [Cd₆Ge₁₆]^4?, were directly self‐assembled through highly‐charged [Ge₄]^4? units and transition metal cations, in which 3‐center–2‐electron σ bonding in Ge₂Zn or Ge₂Cd triangles plays a vital role in the stabilization of the whole structure. The cluster structures have an open framework with a large central cavity of diameter 4.6 Å for Zn and 5.0 Å for Cd, respectively. Time‐dependent HRESI‐MS spectra show that the larger clusters grow from smaller components with a single [Ge₄]^4? and ZnMes₂ units. Calculations performed at the DFT level indicate a very large HOMO–LUMO energy gap in [M₆Ge₁₆]^4? (2.22 eV), suggesting high kinetic stability that may offer opportunities in materials science. These observations offer a new strategy for the assembly of heterometallic clusters with high symmetry.     

Synthesis of syn‐2,4‐Dimercapto‐1,3,2,4‐dithiadigermetane and Its Application to Ge2PdS4 Cluster Synthesis

The sulfurization of DmpGeH₃ (Dmp=2,6‐dimesitylphenyl) afforded the trinuclear germanium sulfide [DmpGe(μ‐S)]₂(μ‐S)₂Ge(SH)‐Dmp and a series of polythiadigermabicyclo[x.1.1]alkanes (x=3, 4, 5). The reduction of the S? S bonds of these germabicycloalkanes by NaBH₄ at 0 °C afforded the dinuclear mercaptogermane syn‐[DmpGe(SH)(μ‐S)₂Ge(SH)‐Dmp] ( 5 ) in good yield. The reaction of [Pd(dppe)Cl₂] (dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane) and the dilithium salt of 5 prepared in situ by the addition of nBuLi (2 equiv) gave the Ge₂PdS₄ cluster [DmpGe(μ‐S)]₂[(μ‐S)₂Pd(dppe)], in which the dithiadigermetanedithiolate is bound to the Pd atom at the two thiolato sulfur atoms. The same reaction with [Pd(PPh₃)₂Cl₂] gave another Ge₂PdS₄ cluster, [DmpGe(μ‐S)]₂[(μ‐S)₂Pd(PPh₃)], but with the dithiadigermetanedithiolate and the Pd center conjoined through a μ‐S atom between the two germanium atoms in addition to the two thiolato sulfur atoms to form a highly distorted cluster core. The formation of two different types of Ge₂PdS₄ clusters represents the usefulness of 5 in the synthesis of various polynuclear complexes composed of germanium and transition metals.     

1,1‐Diethyl‐1‐germa‐2,3,4,5‐tetra‐tert‐butyl‐2,3,4,5‐tetraphospholan (C2H5)2Ge(tBuP)4, Molekül‐ und Kristallstruktur

1,1‐Diethyl‐1‐germa‐2,3,4,5‐tetra‐ tert ‐butyl‐2,3,4,5‐tetraphospholane (C₂H₅)₂Ge( t BuP)₄, Molecular and Crystal Structure The reaction of the diphosphide K₂[(tBuP)₄] · THF ( 1 ) with the germanium(IV) compound (C₂H₅)₂GeCl₂ leads via a [4 + 1]‐cyclo‐condensation reaction to 1,1‐diethyl‐1‐germa‐2,3,4,5‐tetra‐tert‐butyl‐2,3,4,5‐tetraphospholane (C₂H₅)₂Ge(tBuP)₄ ( 2 ) with the 5‐membered GeP₄ ring system. 2 could be characterized ³¹P NMR spectroscopically, mass spectrometrically and by a single crystal structure analysis.     

Two‐, One‐, and Zero‐Dimensional Elemental Nanostructures Based on Ge9‐Clusters

We investigated the structural principles of novel germanium modifications derived by oxidative coupling of Zintl‐type [Ge₉]^4?clusters in various ways. The structures, stabilities, and electronic properties of the predicted {²_∞[Ge₉]_n} sheet, {¹_∞[Ge₉]_n} nanotubes, and fullerene‐like {Ge₉}_n cages were studied by using quantum chemical methods. The polyhedral {Ge₉}_n cages are energetically comparable with bulk‐like nanostructures of the same size, in good agreement with previous experimental findings. Three‐dimensional structures derived from the structures of lower dimensionality are expected to shed light on the structural characteristics of the existing mesoporous Ge materials that possess promising optoelectronic properties. Furthermore, 3D networks derived from the polyhedral {Ge₉}_n cages lead to structures that are closely related to the well‐known LTA zeolite framework, suggesting further possibilities for deriving novel mesoporous modifications of germanium. Raman and IR spectra and simulated X‐ray diffraction patterns of the predicted materials are given to facilitate comparisons with experimental results. The studied novel germanium modifications are semiconducting, and several structure types possess noticeably larger band gaps than bulk α‐Ge.     

Synthesis and Characterisation of 1‐[9‐(H,Me3Si,Me3Ge,Me3Sn)9‐Fluorenyl]‐3,7,10‐trimethylgermatranes. The Crystal Structure Analysis of 1‐(9‐Fluorenyl)‐3,7,10‐trimethylgermatrane

The title compounds, viz. C₁₃H₈(R)Ge · (OCHMeCH₂)₃N ( 1 : R = H, 2 : R = Me₃Si; 3 : R = Me₃Ge) were prepared as mixtures of diastereomers by the reaction of N(CH₂CHMeOSnAlk₃)₃ ( 7 : Alk = Et; 8 : Alk = Bu) with C₁₃H₈(R)GeBr₃ ( 4 : R = H, 5 : R = Me₃Si; 6 : R = Me₃Ge), respectively. The synthesis of C₁₃H₈(Me₃Sn)Ge · (OCHMeCH₂)₃N ( 13 ) by the reaction of germatrane ( 1 ) with Me₃SnNMe₂ is reported. Identity and structures were established by elemental analyses, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The crystal structure of 1 was determined by X‐ray diffraction methods.     

Linking Deltahedral Zintl Clusters with Conjugated Organic Building Blocks: Synthesis and Characterization of the Zintl Triad [R‐Ge9‐CHCHCHCH‐Ge9‐R]4−

The accessibility of triads with deltahedral Zintl clusters in analogy to fullerene–linker–fullerene triads is another example for the close relationship between fullerenes and Zintl clusters. The compound {[K(2.2.2‐crypt)]₄[RGe₉‐CH?CH? CH?CH‐Ge₉R]}(toluene)₂ (R=(2Z,4E)‐7‐amino‐5‐aza‐hepta‐2,4‐dien‐2‐yl), containing two deltahedral [Ge₉] clusters linked by a conjugated (1Z,3Z)‐buta‐1,3‐dien‐1,4‐diyl bridge, was synthesized through the reaction of 1,4‐bis(trimethylsilyl)butadiyne with K₄Ge₉ in ethylenediamine and crystallized after the addition of 2.2.2‐cryptand and toluene. The compound was characterized by single‐crystal structure analysis as well asNMR and IR spectroscopy.     

5‐Amino‐4‐(4‐diethylaminophenyl)‐2‐phenyl‐7‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)‐1,6‐naph­thyridine‐8‐carbonitrile

In the title compound, C₂₉H₃₀N₆, the naphthyridine ring is almost planar with a dihedral angle of 5.4 (1)° between the pyridyl rings. The dihedral angles between the naphthyridine system and the diethyl­amino­phenyl, phenyl and pyrrolidine rings are 53.1 (1), 19.8 (1) and 20.9 (1)°, respectively. The pyrrolidine ring adopts a half‐chair conformation. The mol­ecule is stabilized by weak C—H?N interactions.     

6,6‐Diphenyl‐6,7‐dihydro‐5H‐1,3,4,8‐tetrathia‐6‐stannazulene‐2‐thione and 6,6′‐spirobi[6,7‐dihydro‐5H‐1,3,4,8‐tetrathia‐6‐stannazulene]‐2,2′‐dithione

The title compounds, [Sn(C₆H₅)₂(C₅H₄S₅)] and [Sn(C₅H₄S₅)₂], respectively, are of interest because they can be regarded as intermediate in nature between chelates and heterocyclic compounds containing the C₃S₅ fragment. In contrast with the essentially normal bond lengths and angles within the mol­ecules, the molecular conformations are somewhat unexpected, as are the intermolecular contacts found in the case of the latter compound.     

5‐Acetyl‐2‐amino‐6‐methyl‐4‐(3‐nitrophenyl)‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carbonitrile and 2‐amino‐5‐ethoxycarbonyl‐6‐methyl‐4‐(3‐nitrophenyl)‐4H‐pyrano‐3‐carbonitrile

The structures of the title compounds, C₁₅H₁₃N₃O₄, (I), and C₁₆H₁₅N₃O₅ [IUPAC name: ethyl 6‐amino‐5‐cyano‐2‐methyl‐4‐(3‐nitro­phenyl)‐4H‐pyrano‐3‐carboxyl­ate], (II), are very similar, with the heterocyclic rings adopting boat conformations. The pseudo‐axial m‐nitro­phenyl substituents are rotated by 84.0 (1) and 98.7 (1)° in (I) and (II), respectively, with respect to the four coplanar atoms of the boat. The dihedral angles between the phenyl rings and nitro groups are 12.1 (2) and 8.4 (2)° in (I) and (II), respectively. The two compounds have similar patterns of intermolecular N—H?O and N—H?N hydrogen bonding, which link mol­ecules into infinite tapes along b .