meso,β‐Oligohaloporphyrins as Useful Synthetic Intermediates of Diphenylamine‐Fused Porphyrin and meso‐to‐meso β‐to‐β Doubly Butadiyne‐Bridged Diporphyrin

The chlorination of β‐halo or β,β‐dihaloporphyrins with 2‐chloro‐1,3‐bis(methoxycarbonyl)guanidine (Palau′Chlor) proceeded selectively at the neighboring unsubstituted meso position to afford meso,β‐dihalo or meso,β,β‐trihaloporphyrins. Such oligohaloporphyrins are useful platforms for constructing more‐elaborate porphyrin‐based extended π systems. For example, meso‐chloro‐β,β‐diiodoporphyrin participated in an efficient single‐step synthesis of a diphenylamine‐fused porphyrin. In addition, meso‐chloro‐β‐iodoporphyrin was transformed in stepwise fashion into an efficiently conjugated meso‐to‐meso,β‐to‐β doubly butadiyne‐linked porphyrin dimer, a system which was previously difficult to access without such haloporphyrin precursors.     

Synthesis of Direct β‐to‐β Linked Porphyrin Arrays with Large Electronic Interactions: Branched and Cyclic Oligomers

Direct β‐to‐β linked branched and cyclic porphyrin trimers and pentamers have been synthesized by the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of β‐borylporphyrins and β‐bromoporphyrins. The cyclic porphyrin trimer, the smallest directly linked cyclic porphyrin wheel to date, and its twined pentamer, exhibit small electrochemical HOMO–LUMO gaps, broad nonsplit Soret bands, and red‐shifted Q‐bands, thus indicating large electronic interactions between the constituent porphyrin units.     

Synthesis and Photophysical Properties of Doubly β‐to‐β Bridged Cyclic ZnII Porphyrin Arrays

A series of doubly β‐to‐β bridged cyclic Zn^II porphyrin arrays were prepared by a stepwise Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reaction of borylated Zn^II porphyrin with different bridge groups. The coupling of the building block of β,β′‐diboryl Zn^II porphyrin 1 with different bridges provided the doubly β‐to‐β carbazole‐bridged Zn^II porphyrin array 3 , the fluorene‐bridged Zn^II porphyrin array 5 , the fluorenone‐bridged Zn^II porphyrin array 7 , and the three‐carbazole‐bridged Zn^II porphyrin ring 8 . The structural assignment of 3 was confirmed by the X‐ray diffraction analysis, which revealed a highly symmetrical and remarkably bent syn‐form structure. The incorporation of bridge units with different electronic effects results in different photophysical properties of the cyclic Zn^II porphyrin arrays. Comprehensive photophysical studies demonstrate that the electron‐withdrawing bridge fluorenone has the largest electronic interaction with the Zn^II porphyrin unit among the series, thus resulting in the highest two‐photon absorption cross‐section values (σ⁽²⁾) of 6570±60 GM for 7 . The present work provides a new strategy for developing porphyrin‐based optical materials.     

4,5,9,10‐Pyrene Diimides: A Family of Aromatic Diimides Exhibiting High Electron Mobility and Two‐Photon Excited Emission

The design and synthesis of high‐performance n‐type organic semiconductors are important for the development of future organic optoelectronics. Facile synthetic routes to reach the K‐region of pyrene and produce 4,5,9,10‐pyrene diimide (PyDI) derivatives are reported. The PyDI derivatives exhibited efficient electron transport properties, with the highest electron mobility of up to 3.08 cm² V⁻¹ s⁻¹. The tert‐butyl‐substituted compounds (t‐PyDI) also showed good one‐ and two‐photon excited fluorescence properties. The PyDI derivatives are a new family of aromatic diimides that may exhibit both high electron mobility and good light‐emitting properties, thus making them excellent candidates for future optoelectronics.     

LiMII(IO3)3 (MII=Zn and Cd): Two Promising Nonlinear Optical Crystals Derived from a Tunable Structure Model of α‐LiIO3

Excellent nonlinear optical materials simultaneously meet the requirements of large SHG response, phase‐matching capability, wide transparency windows, considerable energy band‐gap, good thermal stability and structure stability. Herein, two new promising nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals LiM^II(IO₃)₃ (M^II=Zn and Cd) are rationally designed by the aliovalent substitution strategy from the commercialized α‐LiIO₃ with the perfect parallel alignment of IO₃ groups. Compared with parent α‐LiIO₃ and related A^I₂M^IV(IO₃)₆, the title compounds exhibit more stable covalent 3D structure, and overcome the racemic twinning problem of A^I₂M^IV(IO₃)₆. More importantly, both compounds inherit NLO‐favorable structure merits of α‐LiIO₃ and show larger SHG response (≈14× and ≈12×KDP), shorter absorption edge (294 and 297 nm) with wider energy band‐gap (4.21 and 4.18 eV), good thermal stability (460 and 430 °C), phase‐matching behaviors, wider optical transparency window and good structure stability, achieving an excellent balance of NLO properties.