链式网络DEA模型

数据包络分析(DEA)是评价决策单元(DMU)相对有效性的一种工具,现已得到广泛的应用.传统的DEA不考虑系统内部结构,而是将系统作为一个"黑箱"来度量效率.针对多阶段网络结构提出一个新的网络DEA模型—链式网络DEA模型.研究网络决策单元的网络DEA有效性及各个阶段的弱DEA有效性之间的关系,给出了网络DEA有效的充分必要条件.若网络决策单元不是网络DEA有效的,根据模型可以指出系统在哪些阶段是无效的.     

关于DEA有效性“新方法”的探讨

主要指出文献[1],[2]中所用的"新方法"不能完全区分决策单元的DEA有效性和弱DEA有效性.同时,"新方法"中所使用的DEA模型(即文献[3]中超效率DEA模型)的最优解不一定存在,这也是"新方法"使用中的一大缺陷.本文同时指出"新方法"虽然是可以扩充的,但扩充后,某些"新模型"仍然会出现上述问题.如果单纯的去评价决策单元的DEA有效性、弱DEA有效性和非弱DEA有效性时,建议还是使用传统的经典模型为好;如果需要进一步对DEA有效性再进行分析,是可以象最早提出超效率DEA模型的文献[3]中那样去应用超效率DEA模型。     

强DEA有效性的探讨

给出了有关强DEA有效(C2R或C2GS2)的一些必要条件,判断方法及等价的命题,特别是给出了其存在性定理、及有关强DEA有效与扩展DEA有效等价的定理.     

具有偏好锥的链式网络DEA模型

对链式网络DEA模型进行推广,将"偏好锥"引入网络DEA模型.针对中间产出重要性以及决策者评价时的偏好,建立带有产出锥和投入锥相应的两阶段生产可能集,对具有"偏好锥"的链式网络DEA模型,证明了决策单元为网络DEA有效的充要条件,给出了网络DEA有效性与各阶段弱DEA有效性的关系.另外,文章结合具体算例说明了偏好锥的变化对效率评价的影响.关于两阶段的模型以及相关结论可以推广到多阶段网络结构.     

DEA模型在资金分配和管理中的应用

资金的合理使用,是经济活动中的一个非常重要的问题.利用DEA的理论、方法模型,探讨资金的使用效率、分配的合理性,以及最佳资金预算的确定方法.涉及的DEA模型结构属于非参数的最优化DEA模型,以及DEA平行网络结构.模型中所使用的生产可能集是可以评价是否呈现"拥挤"迹象的.     

用超效率综合DEA模型来研究DEA有效性

对超效率综合DEA模型,有三个定理来判断其不可行性,其中一个定理基于加性模型来判断,并证明:当模型不可行时被评决策单元的扩展DEA有效性,由此给出了对扩展DEA有效的决策单元排序的方法,此外,对不含非阿基米德无穷小的基于输入(输出)的超效率综合DEA模型,当其最优值为1时,有一个定理来判断被评单元的DEA有效性.     

国内外DEA网站

本文给出国内外重要的 DEA网站及其内容简介 ,目的是促进 DEA领域的学术交流 .     

灰变量逆DEA模型的初步研究

初步研究了变量为区间灰数的逆DEA模型。变量为区间灰数时,决策单元效率水平保持不变表达为:对决策单元的输入输出值改变前后对应的灰区间效率进行比较,前者大于等于后者与小于等于后者的可信度相等(均等于0.5)。给出了决策单元非DEA有效时,灰区间变量逆DEA模型解存在的充要条件及一般表达式,以及决策单元弱DEA有效时灰变量逆DEA模型的部分解。     

求DEA有效最速方向的一般方法

提出经验生产可能集的支撑超平面表示形式，在献[3]的基础上，对生产可能集内任意非DEA有效的决策单元，给出在生产可能集内，求解其DEA有效最速方向，使其最速达到DEA有效的一般方向，同时指出献[4]、[7]中的两处错误。     

基于C~2R模型的广义链式网络DEA模型

传统网络DEA方法是将传统DEA方法评价过程中的"黑箱"打开,考虑输入到输出的中间环节,对生产过程中的各个环节分别评价。传统网络DEA方法获得的是相对于有效决策单元评价的结果,但有时可能要相对于非有效决策单元或者非决策单元进行评价,传统网络DEA方法无法解决该类问题。为此给出相对于非有效决策单元或者非决策单元进行评价的基于C~2R模型的广义链式网络DEA模型,并探讨相关性质.     

A game theoretical model of DEA efficiency

Motivated by the inherent competitive nature of the DEA efficiency assessment process, some effort has been made to relate DEA models to game theory. Game theory is considered not only a more natural source of representing competitive situations, but also beneficial in revealing additional insights into practical efficiency analysis. Past studies are limited to connecting efficiency games to some particular versions of DEA models. The generalised DEA model considered in this study unifies various important DEA models and presents a basic formulation for the DEA family. By introducing a generalised convex cone constrained efficiency game model in assembling the generalised DEA model, a rigorous connection between game theory and the DEA family is established. We prove the existence of optimal strategies in the generalised efficiency game. We show the equivalence between game efficiency and DEA efficiency. We also provide convex programming models for determination of the optimal strategies of the proposed games, and show that the game efficiency unit corresponds to the non-dominated solution in its corresponding multi-objective programming problem. Our study largely extends the latest developments in this area. The significance of such an extension is for research and applications of both game theory and DEA.     

Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data

The purpose of this paper is to develop a new DEA with an interval efficiency. An original DEA model is to evaluate each DMU optimistically. There is another model called “Inverted DEA” to evaluate each DMU pessimistically. But, there are no relations essentially between DEA and inverted DEA. Thus, we formulate a DEA model with an interval efficiency which consists of efficiencies obtained from the optimistic and pessimistic viewpoints. Thus, two end points can construct an interval efficiency. With the same idea, we deal with the interval inefficiency model which is inverse to interval efficiency. Finally, we extend the proposed DEA model to interval data and fuzzy data.     

具有偏好锥的面向输出的超效率DEA模型分析

鉴于传统DEA模型无法区分有效决策单元,超效率DEA模型未考虑决策者的偏好,现提出面向输出的权重受限的综合超效率DEA模型及其投影概念,并讨论该模型与其他超效率DEA模型之间的关系.接着,分析模型的最优目标函数值与决策单元有效性之间的关系,并讨论面向输出的权重受限的综合超效投影与多目标规划问题的非支配解之间的关系.最后,通过对中国西部12个地区工业企业科技创新效率综合评价,并与原有方法进行比较研究,得出本文方法更具优势和合理性.     

Multiobjective data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is popularly used to evaluate relative efficiency among public or private firms. Most DEA models are established by individually maximizing each firm's efficiency according to its advantageous expectation by a ratio. Some scholars have pointed out the interesting relationship between the multiobjective linear programming (MOLP) problem and the DEA problem. They also introduced the common weight approach to DEA based on MOLP. This paper proposes a new linear programming problem for computing the efficiency of a decision-making unit (DMU). The proposed model differs from traditional and existing multiobjective DEA models in that its objective function is the difference between inputs and outputs instead of the outputs/inputs ratio. Then an MOLP problem, based on the introduced linear programming problem, is formulated for the computation of common weights for all DMUs. To be precise, the modified Chebychev distance and the ideal point of MOLP are used to generate common weights. The dual problem of this model is also investigated. Finally, this study presents an actual case study analysing R&D efficiency of 10 TFT-LCD companies in Taiwan to illustrate this new approach. Our model demonstrates better performance than the traditional DEA model as well as some of the most important existing multiobjective DEA models.     

Experimental evidence on robustness of data envelopment analysis

There is an on-going debate about variable selection in data envelopment analysis (DEA) as there are no diagnostic checks for model misspecification. This paper contributes to this debate by investigating the sensitivity of DEA efficiency estimates to including inappropriate and/or omitting several important variables in a large-sample DEA model. Data are simulated from constant, increasing and decreasing returns-to-scale (RS) Cobb–Douglas production processes. For constant and decreasing RS processes with irrelevant inputs, DEA tends to overestimate efficiency in almost all production units. When relevant variables are omitted, variable RS appears to be a safer option. The correct RS specification is vital when the DEA model includes irrelevant variables. The effect of omission of relevant inputs on individual production unit efficiency is more adverse compared to the inclusion of irrelevant ones.     

基于三阶段DEA模型的我国碳排放效率分析

对我国区域碳排放效率的准确测评是各省区针对性制定减排战略的基础,经典DEA模型未能排除外部环境因素和随机因素的影响,本文利用三阶段DEA模型构建消除外部环境因素和随机因素的区域碳排放效率测算模型。研究表明我国碳排放高效率地区共有广东等9省,中效率地区共有湖南等16省,低效率地区共有甘肃等4省。用三阶段DEA模型测算出的各省1997~2010年平均碳排放效率结果与经典DEA模型测算结果有显著性差异,与我国经济发展实际和预期结果更加吻合,各省可以根据自身测评结果有针对性地提高综合碳排放效率。     

A generalized model for data envelopment analysis with interval data

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method to estimate the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) performing similar tasks in a production system that consumes multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs. So far, a number of DEA models with interval data have been developed. The CCR model with interval data, the BCC model with interval data and the FDH model with interval data are well known as basic DEA models with interval data. In this study, we suggest a model with interval data called interval generalized DEA (IGDEA) model, which can treat the stated basic DEA models with interval data in a unified way. In addition, by establishing the theoretical properties of the relationships among the IGDEA model and those DEA models with interval data, we prove that the IGDEA model makes it possible to calculate the efficiency of DMUs incorporating various preference structures of decision makers.     

On relations between DEA-risk models and stochastic dominance efficiency tests

In this paper, several concepts of portfolio efficiency testing are compared, based either on data envelopment analysis (DEA) or the second-order stochastic dominance (SSD) relation: constant return to scale DEA models, variable return to scale (VRS) DEA models, diversification-consistent DEA models, pairwise SSD efficiency tests, convex SSD efficiency tests and full SSD portfolio efficiency tests. Especially, the equivalence between VRS DEA model with binary weights and the SSD pairwise efficiency test is proved. DEA models equivalent to convex SSD efficiency tests and full SSD portfolio efficiency tests are also formulated. In the empirical application, the efficiency testing of 48 US representative industry portfolios using all considered DEA models and SSD tests is presented. The obtained efficiency sets are compared. A special attention is paid to the case of small number of the inputs and outputs. It is empirically shown that DEA models equivalent either to the convex SSD test or to the SSD portfolio efficiency test work well even with quite small number of inputs and outputs. However, the reduced VRS DEA model with binary weights is not able to identify all the pairwise SSD efficient portfolios.