Concurrent Stabilization of π‐Donor and π‐Acceptor Ligands in Aromatized and Dearomatized Pincer [(PNN)Re(CO)(O)2] Complexes

Aromatized cationic [(PNN)Re(π acid)(O)₂]⁺ ( 1 ) and dearomatized neutral [(PNN*)Re(π acid)(O)₂] ( 2 ) complexes (where π acid=CO ( a ), tBuNC ( b ), or (2,6‐Me₂)PhNC ( c )), possessing both π‐donor and π‐acceptor ligands, have been synthesized and fully characterized. Reaction of [(PNN)Re(O)₂]⁺ ( 4 ) with lithiumhexamethyldisilazide (LiHMDS) yield the dearomatized [(PNN*)Re(O)₂] ( 3 ). Complexes 1 and 2 are prepared from the reaction of 4 and 3 , respectively, with CO or isocyanides. Single‐crystal X‐ray structures of 1 a and 1 b show the expected trans‐dioxo structure, in which the oxo ligands occupy the axial positions and the π‐acidic ligand occupies the equatorial plane in an overall octahedral geometry about the rhenium(V) center. DFT studies revealed the stability of complexes 1 and 2 arises from a π‐backbonding interaction between the d_xy orbital of rhenium, the π orbital of the oxo ligands, and the π* orbital of CO/isocyanide.     

Bis‐ and Tris(pyrazolyl)borate/Methane‐Stabilized PIII‐Centered Cations

We report the synthesis of [H₂B(pz)₂PR]⁺, [H₂C(pz)₂PR]⁺², [HB(pz)₃P]⁺², and [HC(pz)₃P]⁺³ (H₂B(pz)₂=bis(pyrazolyl)borate; H₂C(pz)₂=bis(pyrazolyl)methane; HB(pz)₃=tris(pyrazolyl)borate; HC(pz)₃=tris(pyrazolyl) methane; R=Ph, Cy or Et₂N) by reaction of the corresponding neutral or anionic ligands with chlorophosphines in the presence of TMSOTf. The structures of these compounds were determined by X‐ray crystallographic analysis and the nature of their bonding was examined using density functional theory.     

Observation of Main‐Group Tricarbonyls [B(CO)3] and [C(CO)3]+ Featuring a Tilted One‐Electron Donor Carbonyl Ligand

A combined experimental and theoretical study on the main‐group tricarbonyls [B(CO)₃] in solid noble‐gas matrices and [C(CO)₃]⁺ in the gas phase is presented. The molecules are identified by comparing the experimental and theoretical IR spectra and the vibrational shifts of nuclear isotopes. Quantum chemical ab initio studies suggest that the two isoelectronic species possess a tilted η¹(μ₁‐CO)‐bonded carbonyl ligand, which serves as an unprecedented one‐electron donor ligand. Thus, the central atoms in both complexes still retain an 8‐electron configuration. A thorough analysis of the bonding situation gives quantitative information about the donor and acceptor properties of the different carbonyl ligands. The linearly bonded CO ligands are classical two‐electron donors that display classical σ‐donation and π‐back‐donation following the Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson model. The tilted CO ligand is a formal one‐electron donor that is bonded by σ‐donation and π‐back‐donation that involves the singly occupied orbital of the radical fragments [B(CO)₂] and [C(CO)₂]⁺.     

(1,3‐Dimethylimidazolidine‐2‐selone‐κSe)bis(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ2N,N′)copper(II) bis(perchlorate) and bis(2,2′‐bipyridyl‐κ2N,N′)(imidazolidine‐2‐thione‐κS)copper(II) bis(perchlorate)

In the first title salt, [Cu(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(C₅H₁₀N₂Se)](ClO₄)₂, the Cu^II centre occupies a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal environment defined by four N donors from two 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen) ligands and by the Se donor of a 1,3‐dimethylimidazolidine‐2‐selone ligand, with the equatorial plane defined by the Se and by two N donors from different phen ligands and the axial sites occupied by the two remaining N donors, one from each phen ligand. The Cu—N distances span the range 1.980 (10)–2.114 (11) Å and the Cu—Se distance is 2.491 (3) Å. Intermolecular π–π contacts between imidazolidine rings and the central rings of phen ligands generate chains of cations. In the second salt, [Cu(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂(C₃H₆N₂S)](ClO₄)₂, the Cu^II centre occupies a similar distorted trigonal–bipyramidal environment comprising four N donors from two 2,2′‐bipyridyl (bipy) ligands and an S donor from an imidazolidine‐2‐thione ligand. The equatorial plane is defined by the S donor and two N donors from different bipy ligands. The Cu—N distances span the range 1.984 (6)–2.069 (7) Å and the Cu—S distance is 2.366 (3) Å. Intermolecular π–π contacts between imidazolidine and pyridyl rings form chains of cations. A major difference between the two structures is due to the presence in the second complex of two N—H...O hydrogen bonds linking the imidazolidine N—H hydrogen‐bond donors to perchlorate O‐atom acceptors.     

Ligand π‐Radical Interaction with f‐Shell Unpaired Electrons in Phthalocyaninato–Lanthanoid Single‐Molecule Magnets: A Solution NMR Spectroscopic and DFT Study

The phthalocyaninato double‐decker complexes [M(obPc)₂]⁰ (M= Y^III, Tb^III, Dy^III; obPc=2,3,9,10,16,17,23,24‐octabutoxyphthalocyaninato), along with their reduced ([M(obPc)₂]^?[P(Ph)₄]⁺; M=Tb^III, Dy^III) and oxidized ([M(obPc)₂]⁺[SbCl₆]^? (M=Y^III, Tb^III) counterparts were studied with ¹H, ¹³C and 2D NMR. From the NMR data of the neutral (i.e., with one unpaired electron in the ligands) and anionic Tb^III complexes, along with the use of dispersion corrected DFT methods, it was possible to separate the metal‐centered and ligand‐centered contributions to the hyperfine NMR shift. These contributions to the ¹H and ¹³C hyperfine NMR shifts were further analyzed in terms of pseudocontact and Fermi contact shifts. Furthermore, from a combination of NMR data and DFT calculations, we have determined the spin multiplicity of the neutral complexes [M(obPc)₂]⁰ (M=Tb^III and Dy^III) at room temperature. From the NMR data of the cationic Tb^III complex, for which actually no experimental structure determination is available, we have analyzed the structural changes induced by oxidation from its neutral/anionic species and shown that the interligand distance decreases upon oxidation. The fast electron exchange process between the neutral and anionic Tb^III double‐decker complexes was also studied.     

Coordination Adducts of Niobium(V) and Tantalum(V) Azide M(N3)5 (M=Nb,Ta) with Nitrogen Donor Ligands and their Self‐Ionization

Several new donor–acceptor adducts of niobium and tantalum pentaazide with N‐donor ligands have been prepared from the pentafluorides by fluoride–azide exchange with Me₃SiN₃ in the presence of the corresponding donor ligand. With 2,2′‐bipyridine and 1,10‐phenanthroline, the self‐ionization products [MF₄(2,2′‐bipy)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]⁻, [M(N₃)₄(2,2′‐bipy)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]⁻ and [M(N₃)₄(1,10‐phen)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]⁻ were obtained. With the donor ligands 3,3′‐bipyridine and 4,4′‐bipyridine the neutral pentaazide adducts (M(N₃)₅)₂⋅L (M=Nb, Ta; L=3,3′‐bipy, 4,4′‐bipy) were formed.     

Bis(2‐pyridyl­methanol)­bis­(saccharinato)­zinc(II) and ‐cadmium(II) at 120 K: three‐dimensional structures containing both N‐and O‐coordinated ambi­dentate saccharinate ligands

The title complexes [M(sac)₂(mpy)₂] [sac is saccharinate (C₇H₄NO₃S) and mpy is 2‐pyridyl­methanol (C₆H₇NO)], with M = Zn^II and Cd^II, are isostructural and consist of neutral mol­ecules. The Zn^II or Cd^II cations are octahedrally coordinated by the two neutral mpy and two anionic sac ligands. The mpy ligand acts as a bidentate donor through the amine N and hydroxyl O atoms. The sac ligands exhibit an ambidentate coordination behaviour; one is N‐coordinated and the other is O‐coordinated within the same coordination octahedron. The crystal packing is determined by C—H?O‐type hydrogen bonding, as well as by weak py–py and sac–sac aromatic π–π‐stacking interactions.     

Coordination Adducts of Niobium(V) and Tantalum(V) Azide M(N3)5 (M=Nb,Ta) with Nitrogen Donor Ligands and their Self‐Ionization

Several new donor–acceptor adducts of niobium and tantalum pentaazide with N‐donor ligands have been prepared from the pentafluorides by fluoride–azide exchange with Me₃SiN₃ in the presence of the corresponding donor ligand. With 2,2′‐bipyridine and 1,10‐phenanthroline, the self‐ionization products [MF₄(2,2′‐bipy)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]^?, [M(N₃)₄(2,2′‐bipy)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]^? and [M(N₃)₄(1,10‐phen)₂]⁺[M(N₃)₆]^? were obtained. With the donor ligands 3,3′‐bipyridine and 4,4′‐bipyridine the neutral pentaazide adducts (M(N₃)₅)₂?L (M=Nb, Ta; L=3,3′‐bipy, 4,4′‐bipy) were formed.     

Ruthenium Complexes of an Abnormally Bound,Anionic N‐Heterocyclic Carbene

The abnormally bound, anionic NHC–borane complex [Ru(IDipp‐BF₃)(p‐cymene)Cl]₂ ( 4 ; IDipp‐BF₃=1,3‐(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)₂‐2‐BF₃(C₃HN₂)‐4‐yl) was synthesized by transmetalation from Li[(IDipp‐BF₃)₂Ag]. Addition of donors gave species of the form [Ru(IDipp‐BF₃)(p‐cymene)(L)Cl], whereas halide abstraction with Ag(Et₂O)[B(C₆F₅)₄] gave C?H activation of the methine position of the IDipp?BF₃ ligand.     

Bonding Analysis of N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Tautomers and Phosphine Ligands in Transition‐Metal Complexes: A Theoretical Study

DFT calculations at the BP86/TZ2P level were carried out to analyze quantitatively the metal–ligand bonding in transition‐metal complexes that contain imidazole (IMID), imidazol‐2‐ylidene (nNHC), or imidazol‐4‐ylidene (aNHC). The calculated complexes are [Cl₄TM(L)] (TM=Ti, Zr, Hf), [(CO)₅TM(L)] (TM=Cr, Mo, W), [(CO)₄TM(L)] (TM=Fe, Ru, Os), and [ClTM(L)] (TM=Cu, Ag, Au). The relative energies of the free ligands increase in the order IMID<nNHC<aNHC. The energy levels of the carbon σ lone‐pair orbitals suggest the trend aNHC>nNHC>IMID for the donor strength, which is in agreement with the progression of the metal–ligand bond‐dissociation energy (BDE) for the three ligands for all metals of Groups 4, 6, 8, and 10. The electrostatic attraction can also be decisive in determining trends in ligand–metal bond strength. The comparison of the results of energy decomposition analysis for the Group 6 complexes [(CO)₅TM(L)] (L=nNHC, aNHC, IMID) with phosphine complexes (L=PMe₃ and PCl₃) shows that the phosphine ligands are weaker σ donors and better π acceptors than the NHC tautomers nNHC, aNHC, and IMID.     

Unusual Coordination Modes of Tris(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borates: Synthesis and Solid State Structures of Sodium[(dimethylamino)tris(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate], Potassium[(dimethylamino)tris(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate], and Potassium[phenyltris(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate]

We report the optimized syntheses and the solid state structures of the alkali metal tris(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borates M[Me₂NBpz₃] (M = Na⁺ ( 1 ), K⁺ ( 2 ); pz = pyrazol‐1‐yl) and K[PhBpz₃] ( 3 ). Even though 1 and 2 consist of polymeric chains in the solid state, it is possible to identify subunits where the [Me₂NBpz₃]^? ion acts as tridentate ligand towards Na⁺ and K⁺ and binds via two of its pyrazolyl rings and its dimethylamino nitrogen atom (κ³N_pz,N_pz,N_NMe). In 3 , the ligand [PhBpz₃]^? employs two pyrazolyl donors and the π‐face of its phenyl substituent for potassium coordination (κ³N,N,C).     

S,N‐Chelated organotin(IV) compounds containing 6‐phenylpyridazine‐3‐thiolate ligand—structural,antibacterial and antifungal study

A series of tri‐ and diorganotin(IV) compounds containing potentially chelating S,N‐ligand(s) (L^SN, where L^SN is 6‐phenylpyridazine‐3‐thiolate) were prepared and structurally characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. X‐ray diffraction techniques were used for determination of the structure of compounds containing one [(L^SN)Ph₂SnCl], two [(n‐Bu)₂Sn(L^SN)₂] and the combination of two L^SN and one L^CN [(L^CN)(n‐Bu)Sn(L^SN)₂] (where L^CN is {2‐[(CH₃)₂NCH₂]C₆H₄}‐) ligands. The coordination number of the tin atom varies from five to seven and is dependent on the number of chelating ligands present. The formation of the five‐membered azastanna heterocycle is favored over the formation of four‐membered azastannathia heterocycle in compounds containing both types of ligands. The di‐n‐butyl‐substituted compounds are the most efficient ones in inhibition of growth of yeasts, molds and G⁺ bacteria strains. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Expanded‐Ring N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes for the Stabilization of Highly Electrophilic Gold(I) Cations

Strategies for the synthesis of highly electrophilic Au^I complexes from either hydride‐ or chloride‐containing precursors have been investigated by employing sterically encumbered Dipp‐substituted expanded‐ring NHCs (Dipp=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃). Thus, complexes of the type (NHC)AuH have been synthesised (for NHC=6‐Dipp or 7‐Dipp) and shown to feature significantly more electron‐rich hydrides than those based on ancillary imidazolylidene donors. This finding is consistent with the stronger σ‐donor character of these NHCs, and allows for protonation of the hydride ligand. Such chemistry leads to the loss of dihydrogen and to the trapping of the [(NHC)Au]⁺ fragment within a dinuclear gold cation containing a bridging hydride. Activation of the hydride ligand in (NHC)AuH by B(C₆F₅)₃, by contrast, generates a species (at low temperatures) featuring a [HB(C₆F₅)₃]^? fragment with spectroscopic signatures similar to the “free” borate anion. Subsequent rearrangement involves B?C bond cleavage and aryl transfer to the carbophilic metal centre. Under halide abstraction conditions utilizing Na[BAr^f₄] (Ar^f=C₆H₃(CF₃)₂‐3,5), systems of the type [(NHC)AuCl] (NHC=6‐Dipp or 7‐Dipp) generate dinuclear complexes [{(NHC)Au}₂(μ‐Cl)]⁺ that are still electrophilic enough at gold to induce aryl abstraction from the [BAr^f₄]^? counterion.     

Enhanced Reactivities of Iron(IV)‐Oxo Porphyrin π‐Cation Radicals in Oxygenation Reactions by Electron‐Donating Axial Ligands

The proximal axial ligand in heme iron enzymes plays an important role in tuning the reactivities of iron(IV)‐oxo porphyrin π‐cation radicals in oxidation reactions. The present study reports the effects of axial ligands in olefin epoxidation, aromatic hydroxylation, alcohol oxidation, and alkane hydroxylation, by [(tmp)^+. Fe^IV(O)(p‐Y‐PyO)]⁺ ( 1 ‐Y) (tmp=meso‐tetramesitylporphyrin, p‐Y‐PyO=para‐substituted pyridine N‐oxides, and Y=OCH₃, CH₃, H, Cl). In all of the oxidation reactions, the reactivities of 1 ‐Y are found to follow the order 1 ‐OCH₃ > 1 ‐CH₃ > 1 ‐H > 1 ‐Cl; negative Hammett ρ values of ?1.4 to ?2.7 were obtained by plotting the reaction rates against the σ_p values of the substituents of p‐Y‐PyO. These results, as well as previous ones on the effect of anionic nucleophiles, show that iron(IV)‐oxo porphyrin π‐cation radicals bearing electron‐donating axial ligands are more reactive in oxo‐transfer and hydrogen‐atom abstraction reactions. These results are counterintuitive since iron(IV)‐oxo porphyrin π‐cation radicals are electrophilic species. Theoretical calculations of anionic and neutral ligands reproduced the counterintuitive experimental findings and elucidated the root cause of the axial ligand effects. Thus, in the case of anionic ligands, as the ligand becomes a better electron donor, it strengthens the FeO? H bond and thereby enhances its H‐abstraction activity. In addition, it weakens the Fe?O bond and encourages oxo‐transfer reactivity. Both are Bell–Evans–Polanyi effects, however, in a series of neutral ligands like p‐Y‐PyO, there is a relatively weak trend that appears to originate in two‐state reactivity (TSR). This combination of experiment and theory enabled us to elucidate the factors that control the reactivity patterns of iron(IV)‐oxo porphyrin π‐cation radicals in oxidation reactions and to resolve an enigmatic and fundamental problem.     

Tris(mercaptoimidazolyl)hydroborato complexes of cobalt and iron, [TmPh]2M (M=Fe,Co): structural comparisons with their tris(pyrazolyl)hydroborato counterparts

The tris(mercaptophenylimidazolyl)borate iron and cobalt complexes [Tm^Ph]₂M (M=Fe, Co) have been synthesized by reaction of [Tm^Ph]Tl with MI₂. Structural characterization by X-ray diffraction demonstrates that the potentially tridentate [Tm^Ph] ligand binds through only two sulfur donors in these ‘sandwich’ complexes and that the ‘tetrahedral’ metal centers supplement the bonding by interactions with the two B–H groups. Comparison of the structures of [Tm^Ph]₂M (M=Fe, Co) with the related tris(pyrazolyl)borate [Tp^Ph]₂M counterparts indicates that the tris(mercaptoimidazolyl) ligand favors lower primary coordination numbers in divalent metal complexes. The trivalent complexes, {[Tp^Ph]₂Fe}[ClO₄] and {[pzBm^Me]₂Co}I, however, exhibit octahedral coordination, with the ligands binding using their full complement of donor atoms.     

Functionalised Tris(pyrazolyl)methane Ligands and Re(CO)3 Complexes Thereof

The synthesis of new tripodal nitrogen ligands derived from tris(pyrazolyl)methane (Tpm^R, R = H, tBu, Ph in 3‐position) is described. After deprotonation of the parent tris(pyrazolyl)methane Tpm^R, the carbanion reacts readily with ethylene oxide to yield the 3,3,3‐tris(3′‐substituted pyrazolyl)propanol ligands[(3‐Rpz)₃CCH₂CH₂OH, R = H, tBu, Ph, 1a – c ]. These ligands can be easily derivatised at the alcohol function. Microwave‐assisted reactions of these ligands and [Re(CO)₅Br] yields the complex [( 1a )Re(CO)₃]Br ( 4 ) in the case of ligand 1a , whereas in the case of the substituted ligands 1b and 1c degradation was observed. The degradation products are identified as [(Hpz^R)₂Re(CO)₃Br] [R = tBu ( 7b ), Ph ( 7c )]. These complexes were also prepared directly from [Re(CO)₅Br] and the corresponding pyrazoles by microwave‐assisted synthesis. The Re(CO)₃ complexes 4 and [( 1a )Re(CO)₃]OTf ( 5 ) are water‐soluble. The structures of 5· H₂O and [{(pz)₃CCH₂CH₃}Re(CO)₃]OTf · 1.5H₂O · ¹/₂CH₃CN ( 6· 1.5H₂O · ¹/₂CH₃CN) as well as the structure of 7b have been elucidated by X‐ray crystallography.     

Quinine‐Derived Imidazolidin‐2‐imine Ligands: Synthesis,Coordination Chemistry,and Application in Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenation

Two new optically active bidentate N,N‐ligands, DMIQCI ( 3a ) and DMIQCD ( 3b ), containing a quinuclidine core and an imidazolidin‐2‐imine unit, were synthesized. The reaction of these ligands with [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)RuCl]₄ afforded the brick‐red ruthenium(II) complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ru(DMIQCI)Cl] ( 4 ) and [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Ru(DMIQCD)Cl] ( 5 ), which were used as catalysts in the transfer hydrogenation of acetophenone in boiling 2‐propanol. The reactions of 3a and 3b with [(COD)PdCl₂] (COD = 1,5‐cycloocta‐diene) and with [(DME)NiBr₂] (DME = 1,2‐dimethoxyethane) afforded the square‐planar palladium(II) complexes [(DMIQCI)PdCl₂] ( 7 ) and [(DMIQCD)PdCl₂] ( 8 ) or the tetrahedral nickel(II) complexes [(DMIQCI)NiBr₂] ( 9 ) and [(DMIQCD)NiBr₂] ( 10 ), respectively. The X‐ray crystal structures of 4 , 7 , 9· THF, and 10 are reported.     

Tripodale Bis(2,6‐iminophosphoranyl)pyridin‐Liganden: Eisen‐ und Cobalt‐Komplexe mit Potential in der Ethen‐Polymerisation

Tripodal Bis(2,6‐iminophosphoranyl)pyridine Ligands: Iron and Cobalt Complexes with a Potential in Ethene Polymerisation By Staudinger Reaction of bis‐2,6‐diphenylphosphanyl‐pyridine with aryl‐, alkyl‐ and silylazides tripodal ligands L = 2,6‐(Ph₂P=NR)₂C₅H₃N (R = Ph 1 a , Mes 1 b , Ad  1 c , SiMe₃ 1 d ) are synthesized. The reaction of ligand 1 b  with equimolar amounts of [CoCl₂(THF)₂] and [FeCl₂(THF)_1.5] in THF does not lead to the expected neutral complexes [(k³‐L)MCl₂] but to coordination compounds of the composition L₂(CoCl₂)₃ ( 2 a ) und L(FeCl₂)₂ ( 3 ). By using acetonitrile as solvent or by crystallisation of 2 a from hot acetonitrile the cationic complex [(k³‐L)CoCl(MeCN)]Cl ( 2 b ) is formed as a second product. The molecular structure 2 b has been characterized by an X‐ray single crystal structure analysis (triclinic, P1, Z = 2, a = 1299.8(1), b = 1488.8(2), c = 1674.2(2) pm, α = 82.911(13)°, β = 76.715(12)°, γ = 72.758(11)°). A preliminary test with 3 shows, that coordination compounds of the ligand system introduced here have potential as catalysts in methyl alumoxane mediated ethene polymerisation.     

Remote Multiproton Storage within a Pyrrolide‐Pincer‐Type Ligand

A chemically non‐innocent pyrrole‐based trianionic (ONO)^3? pincer ligand within [(pyr‐ONO)TiCl(thf)₂] ( 2 ) can access the dianionic [(3H‐pyr‐ONO)TiCl₂(thf)] ( 1‐THF ) and monoanionic [(3H,4H‐pyr‐ONO)TiCl₂(OEt₂)][B{3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₄] ( 3‐Et₂O ) states through remote protonation of the pyrrole γ‐C π‐bonds. The homoleptic [(3H‐pyr‐ONO)₂Zr] ( 4 ) was synthesized and characterized by X‐ray diffraction and NMR spectroscopy in solution. The protonation of 4 by [H(OEt₂)₂][B{C₆H₃(CF₃)₂}₄] yields [(3H,4H‐pyr‐ONO)(3H‐pyr‐ONO)Zr][B{3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₄] ( 5 ), thus demonstrating the storage of three protons.     

Modification of σ‐Donor Properties of Terminal Carbide Ligands Investigated Through Carbide–Iodine Adduct Formation

The terminal carbide ligands in [(Cy₃P)₂X₂Ru≡C] complexes (X=halide or pseudohalide) coordinate molecular iodine, affording charge‐transfer complexes rather than oxidation products. Crystallographic and vibrational spectroscopic data show the perturbations of iodine to vary with the auxiliary ligand sphere on ruthenium, demonstrating the σ‐donor properties of carbide complexes to be tunable.