Formation of Organolithium Hetero‐Aggregates [Li4Ar2(nBu)2] (Ar=C6H4CH(Me)NMe2‐2) during the Directed ortho‐Lithiation of [1‐(Dimethylamino)ethyl]benzene

(R)‐[1‐(Dimethylamino)ethyl]benzene reacts with nBuLi in a 1:1 molar ratio in pentane to quantitatively yield a unique hetero‐aggregate ( 2 a ) containing the lithiated arene, unreacted nBuLi, and the complexed parent arene in a 1:1:1 ratio. As a model compound, [Li₄(C₆H₄CH(Me)NMe₂‐2)₂(nBu)₂] ( 2 b ) was prepared from the quantitative redistribution reaction of the parent lithiated arene Li(C₆H₄CH(Me)NMe₂‐2) with nBuLi in a 1:1 molar ratio. The mono‐Et₂O adduct [Li₄(C₆H₄CH(Me)NMe₂‐2)₂(nBu)₂(OEt₂)] ( 2 c ) and the bis‐Et₂O adduct [Li₄(C₆H₄CH(Me)NMe₂‐2)₂(nBu)₂(OEt₂)₂] ( 2 d ) were obtained by re‐crystallization of 2 b from pentane/Et₂O and pure Et₂O, respectively. The single‐crystal X‐ray structure determinations of 2 b – d show that the overall structural motifs of all three derivatives are closely related. They are all tetranuclear Li aggregates in which the four Li atoms are arranged in an almost regular tetrahedron. These structures can be described as consisting of two linked dimeric units: one Li₂Ar₂ dimer and a hypothetical Li₂nBu₂ dimer. The stereochemical aspects of the chiral Li₂Ar₂ fragment are discussed. The structures as observed in the solid state are apparently retained in solution as revealed by a combination of cryoscopy and ¹H, ¹³C, and ⁶Li NMR spectroscopy.     

Chiral Lithiated Allylic α‐Sulfonyl Carbanions: Experimental and Computational Study of Their Structure,Configurational Stability,and Enantioselective Synthesis

X‐ray crystal structure analysis of the lithiated allylic α‐sulfonyl carbanions [CH₂?CHC(Me)SO₂Ph]Li ? diglyme, [cC₆H₈SO₂tBu]Li ? PMDETA and [cC₇H₁₀SO₂tBu]Li ? PMDETA showed dimeric and monomeric CIPs, having nearly planar anionic C atoms, only O?Li bonds, almost planar allylic units with strong C?C bond length alternation and the s‐trans conformation around C1?C2. They adopt a C1?S conformation, which is similar to the one generally found for alkyl and aryl substituted α‐sulfonyl carbanions. Cryoscopy of [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF at 164 K revealed an equilibrium between monomers and dimers in a ratio of 83:17, which is similar to the one found by low temperature NMR spectroscopy. According to NMR spectroscopy the lone‐pair orbital at C1 strongly interacts with the C?C double bond. Low temperature ⁶Li,¹H NOE experiments of [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF point to an equilibrium between monomeric CIPs having only O?Li bonds and CIPs having both O?Li and C1?Li bonds. Ab initio calculation of [MeCH?CHC(Me)SO₂Me]Li ? (Me₂O)₂ gave three isomeric CIPs having the s‐trans conformation and three isomeric CIPs having the s‐cis conformation around the C1?C2 bond. All s‐trans isomers are more stable than the s‐cis isomers. At all levels of theory the s‐trans isomer having O?Li and C1?Li bonds is the most stable one followed by the isomer which has two O?Li bonds. The allylic unit of the C,O,Li isomer shows strong bond length alternation and the C1 atom is in contrast to the O,Li isomer significantly pyramidalized. According to NBO analysis of the s‐trans and s‐cis isomers, the interaction of the lone pair at C1 with the π* orbital of the CC double bond is energetically much more favorable than that with the “empty” orbitals at the Li atom. The C1?S and C1?C2 conformations are determined by the stereoelectronic effects n_C–σ_SR* interaction and allylic conjugation. ¹H DNMR spectroscopy of racemic [EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li, [iPrCH?CHC(iPr)SO₂tBu]Li and [EtCH?C(Me)C(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in [D₈]THF gave estimated barriers of enantiomerization of ΔG^≠=13.2 kcal mol^?1 (270 K), 14.2 kcal mol^?1 (291 K) and 14.2 kcal mol^?1 (295 K), respectively. Deprotonation of sulfone (R)‐EtCH?CHCH(Et)SO₂tBu (94 % ee) with nBuLi in THF at ?105 °C occurred with a calculated enantioselectivity of 93 % ee and gave carbanion (M)‐[EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li, the deuteration and alkylation of which with CF₃CO₂D and MeOCH₂I, respectively, proceeded with high enantioselectivities. Time‐dependent deuteration of the enantioenriched carbanion (M)‐[EtCH?CHC(Et)SO₂tBu]Li in THF gave a racemization barrier of ΔG^≠=12.5 kcal mol^?1 (168 K), which translates to a calculated half‐time of racemization of t_1/2=12 min at ?105 °C.     

Self‐Assembly of Chiral Propeller‐like Supermolecules with Unusual “Sergeants‐and‐Soldiers” and “Majority‐Rules” Effects

Chiral amplification is an interesting phenomenon in supramolecular chemistry mainly observed in complicated systems in which cooperative effect dominate. Herein, chiral, supramolecular, propeller‐like architectures have been constructed through coassembly of an achiral disk‐shaped molecule and chiral amino acid derivatives driven by intermolecular hydrogen bonding. Both the “sergeants‐and‐soldiers” principle and “majority‐rules” effect are applicable in these discrete four‐component supermolecules, which are the simplest supramolecular system ever reported that exhibit chiral amplification.     

μ3‐η2:η2:η2‐Coordination of Primary Silane on a Triruthenium Plane

A μ₃‐η²:η²:η²‐silane complex, [(Cp*Ru)₃(μ₃‐η²:η²:η²‐H₃SitBu)(μ‐H)₃] ( 2 a ; Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅), was synthesized from the reaction of [{Cp*Ru(μ‐H)}₃(μ₃‐H)₂] ( 1 ) with tBuSiH₃. Complex 2 a is the first example of a silane ligand adopting a μ₃‐η²:η²:η² coordination mode. This unprecedented coordination mode was established by NMR and IR spectroscopy as well as X‐ray diffraction analysis and supported by a density functional study. Variable‐temperature NMR analysis implied that 2 a equilibrates with a tautomeric μ₃‐silyl complex ( 3 a ). Although 3 a was not isolated, the corresponding μ₃‐silyl complex, [(Cp*Ru)₃(μ₃‐η²:η²‐H₂SiPh)(H)(μ‐H)₃] ( 3 b ), was obtained from the reaction of 1 with PhSiH₃. Treatment of 2 a with PhSiH₃ resulted in a silane exchange reaction, leading to the formation of 3 b accompanied by the elimination of tBuSiH₃. This result indicates that the μ₃‐silane complex can be regarded as an “arrested” intermediate for the oxidative addition/reductive elimination of a primary silane to a trinuclear site.     

Synthesis of a “Butterfly Cage” Based on a Double‐Decker Silsesquioxane

Novel polyhedral structures were prepared with a butterfly‐shape composed of oligosiloxane wings and a double‐decker silsesquioxane (DDSQ) body. The compounds were synthesized in two steps from commercially available alkoxysilanes, and their structures were confirmed using spectroscopic methods and X‐ray crystallography. Not like other phenyl‐substituted cage silsesquioxanes, these butterfly cages show very good solubility in common organic solvents. The crystal structures clearly showed their unique features: a larger space with longer siloxane chains and a very flexible framework. Moreover, these compounds are thermally stable with a Td₅ (5 % weight loss temperature) over 320 °C.     

On the Origin of the “Giant” Electroclinic Effect in a “De Vries”‐Type Ferroelectric Liquid Crystal Material for Chirality Sensing Applications

W415 is a chiral smectic compound with a remarkably weak temperature dependence of its giant electroclinic effect in the liquid crystalline smectic A* phase. Furthermore it possesses a high spontaneous polarization in the smectic C* phase. The origin of this striking electroclinic effect is the co‐occurrence of a de Vries‐type ordering with a weak first‐order tilting transition (see the synchroton X‐ray scattering profiles).

     

Structure and Function of a “Head‐to‐Middle” Prenyltransferase: Lavandulyl Diphosphate Synthase

We report the first X‐ray structure of the unique “head‐to‐middle” monoterpene synthase, lavandulyl diphosphate synthase (LPPS). LPPS catalyzes the condensation of two molecules of dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) to form lavandulyl diphosphate, a precursor to the fragrance lavandulol. The structure is similar to that of the bacterial cis‐prenyl synthase, undecaprenyl diphosphate synthase (UPPS), and contains an allylic site (S1) in which DMAPP ionizes and a second site (S2) which houses the DMAPP nucleophile. Both S‐thiolo‐dimethylallyl diphosphate and S‐thiolo‐isopentenyl diphosphate bind intact to S2, but are cleaved to (thio)diphosphate, in S1. His78 (Asn in UPPS) is essential for catalysis and is proposed to facilitate diphosphate release in S1, while the P1 phosphate in S2 abstracts a proton from the lavandulyl carbocation to form the LPP product. The results are of interest since they provide the first structure and structure‐based mechanism of this unusual prenyl synthase.