Self‐Assembly of Dialkyltin Moieties and Mercaptobenzoic Acid into Macrocyclic Complexes with Hydrophobic “Pseudo‐Cage” or Double‐Cavity Structures: Supramolecular Infrastructures Involving Intermolecular C?H⋅⋅⋅S Weak Hydrogen Bonds and π–π Interactions

Four novel organotin complexes of two types—[R₂Sn(o‐SC₆H₄CO₂)]₆ (R=Me, 1 ?H₂O; nBu, 2 ) and {[R₂Sn(m‐CO₂C₆H₄S)R₂Sn(m‐SC₆H₄CO₂)SnR₂]O}₂ (R=Me, 3 ; nBu, 4 )—have been prepared by treatment of o‐ or m‐mercaptobenzoic acid and the corresponding R₂SnCl₂ (R=Me, nBu) with sodium ethoxide in ethanol (95 %). All the complexes were characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR and NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn) spectroscopy, TGA, and X‐ray crystallography diffraction analysis. The molecular structure analyses reveal that both 1 and 2 are hexanuclear macrocycles with hydrophobic “pseudo‐cage” structures, while 3 and 4 are hexanuclear macrocycles with double‐cavity structures. Furthermore, the supramolecular structure analyses show that looser and more intriguing supramolecular infrastructures were also found in complexes 1 – 4 , which exist either as one‐dimensional chains of rings or as two‐dimensional networks assembled from the organometallic subunits through intermolecular C? H???S weak hydrogen bonds (WHBs) and π–π interactions.     

{nBuMg(OR)}2 und {Mg(OR)2}2 (R = 2, 4, 6‐tBu3C6H2) – sterisch überfrachtete Magnesiumalkoholate

Reaction of 2, 4, 6‐tri‐tert‐butylphenol ( 1 ) with di‐n‐butylmagnesium in the molar ratio 1:1 allows the synthesis of {(nBu)Mg(μ‐OR)₂Mg(nBu)} ( 2 ) (R = 2, 4, 6‐tBu₃C₆H₂), which reacts with excess 1 to give the homoleptic alcoholate complex {(RO)Mg(μ‐OR)₂Mg(OR)} ( 3 ) (R = 2, 4, 6‐tBu₃C₆H₂). The structures of 2 and 3 were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

Light‐Induced Rearrangement of Thioether‐Substituted Phosphanide Ligands: Scope and Limitations of a Remarkable Isomerization

Treatment of the thioether‐substituted secondary phosphanes R²PH(C₆H₄‐2‐SR¹) [R²=(Me₃Si)₂CH, R¹=Me ( 1_PH ), iPr ( 2_PH ), Ph ( 3_PH ); R²=tBu, R¹=Me ( 4_PH ); R²=Ph, R¹=Me ( 5_PH )] with nBuLi yields the corresponding lithium phosphanides, which were isolated as their THF ( 1 – 5_Pa ) and tmeda ( 1 – 5_Pb ) adducts. Solid‐state structures were obtained for the adducts [R²P(C₆H₄‐2‐SR¹)]Li(L)_n [R²=(Me₃Si)₂CH, R¹=nPr, (L)_n=tmeda ( 2_Pb ); R²=(Me₃Si)₂CH, R¹=Ph, (L)_n=tmeda ( 3_Pb ); R²=Ph, R¹=Me, (L)_n=(THF)_1.33 ( 5_Pa ); R²=Ph, R¹=Me, (L)_n=([12]crown‐4)₂ ( 5_Pc )]. Treatment of 1_PH with either PhCH₂Na or PhCH₂K yields the heavier alkali metal complexes [{(Me₃Si)₂CH}P(C₆H₄‐2‐SMe)]M(THF)_n [M=Na ( 1_Pd ), K ( 1_Pe )]. With the exception of 2_Pa and 2_Pb , photolysis of these complexes with white light proceeds rapidly to give the thiolate species [R²P(R¹)(C₆H₄‐2‐S)]M(L)_n [M=Li, L=THF ( 1_Sa , 3_Sa – 5_Sa ); M=Li, L=tmeda ( 1_Sb , 3_Sb – 5_Sb ); M=Na, L=THF ( 1_Sd ); M=K, L=THF ( 1_Se )] as the sole products. The compounds 3_Sa and 4_Sa may be desolvated to give the cyclic oligomers [[{(Me₃Si)₂CH}P(Ph)(C₆H₄‐2‐S)]Li]₆ (( 3_S )₆) and [[tBuP(Me)(C₆H₄‐2‐S)]Li]₈ (( 4_S )₈), respectively. A mechanistic study reveals that the phosphanide–thiolate rearrangement proceeds by intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the phosphanide center at the carbon atom of the substituent at sulfur. For 2_Pa / 2_Pb , competing intramolecular β‐deprotonation of the n‐propyl substituent results in the elimination of propene and the formation of the phosphanide–thiolate dianion [{(Me₃Si)₂CH}P(C₆H₄‐2‐S)]^2?.     

The Nature of the UC Double Bond: Pushing the Stability of High‐Oxidation‐State Uranium Carbenes to the Limit

Treatment of [K(BIPM^MesH)] (BIPM^Mes={C(PPh₂NMes)₂}^2?; Mes=C₆H₂‐2,4,6‐Me₃) with [UCl₄(thf)₃] (1 equiv) afforded [U(BIPM^MesH)(Cl)₃(thf)] ( 1 ), which generated [U(BIPM^Mes)(Cl)₂(thf)₂] ( 2 ), following treatment with benzyl potassium. Attempts to oxidise 2 resulted in intractable mixtures, ligand scrambling to give [U(BIPM^Mes)₂] or the formation of [U(BIPM^MesH)(O)₂(Cl)(thf)] ( 3 ). The complex [U(BIPM^Dipp)(μ‐Cl)₄(Li)₂(OEt₂)(tmeda)] ( 4 ) (BIPM^Dipp={C(PPh₂NDipp)₂}^2?; Dipp=C₆H₃‐2,6‐iPr₂; tmeda=N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine) was prepared from [Li₂(BIPM^Dipp)(tmeda)] and [UCl₄(thf)₃] and, following reflux in toluene, could be isolated as [U(BIPM^Dipp)(Cl)₂(thf)₂] ( 5 ). Treatment of 4 with iodine (0.5 equiv) afforded [U(BIPM^Dipp)(Cl)₂(μ‐Cl)₂(Li)(thf)₂] ( 6 ). Complex 6 resists oxidation, and treating 4 or 5 with N‐oxides gives [{U(BIPM^DippH)(O)₂‐ (μ‐Cl)₂Li(tmeda)] ( 7 ) and [{U(BIPM^DippH)(O)₂(μ‐Cl)}₂] ( 8 ). Treatment of 4 with tBuOLi (3 equiv) and I₂ (1 equiv) gives [U(BIPM^Dipp)(OtBu)₃(I)] ( 9 ), which represents an exceptionally rare example of a crystallographically authenticated uranium(VI)–carbon σ bond. Although 9 appears sterically saturated, it decomposes over time to give [U(BIPM^Dipp)(OtBu)₃]. Complex 4 reacts with PhCOtBu and Ph₂CO to form [U(BIPM^Dipp)(μ‐Cl)₄(Li)₂(tmeda)(OCPhtBu)] ( 10 ) and [U(BIPM^Dipp)(Cl)(μ‐Cl)₂(Li)(tmeda)(OCPh₂)] ( 11 ). In contrast, complex 5 does not react with PhCOtBu and Ph₂CO, which we attribute to steric blocking. However, complexes 5 and 6 react with PhCHO to afford (DippNPPh₂)₂C?C(H)Ph ( 12 ). Complex 9 does not react with PhCOtBu, Ph₂CO or PhCHO; this is attributed to steric blocking. Theoretical calculations have enabled a qualitative bracketing of the extent of covalency in early‐metal carbenes as a function of metal, oxidation state and the number of phosphanyl substituents, revealing modest covalent contributions to U?C double bonds.     

Diversification of ortho‐Fused Cycloocta‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one Cores and Eight‐ to Six‐Ring Conversion by σ Bond C−C Cleavage

Sequential treatment of 2‐C₆H₄Br(CHO) with LiC≡CR¹ (R¹=SiMe₃, tBu), nBuLi, CuBr?SMe₂ and HC≡CCHClR² [R²=Ph, 4‐CF₃Ph, 3‐CNPh, 4‐(MeO₂C)Ph] at ?50 °C leads to formation of an intermediate carbanion (Z)‐1,2‐C₆H₄{C_A(=O)C≡C_BR¹}{CH=CH(CH^?)R²} ( 4 ). Low temperatures (?50 °C) favour attack at C_B leading to kinetic formation of 6,8‐bicycles containing non‐classical C‐carbanion enolates ( 5 ). Higher temperatures (?10 °C to ambient) and electron‐deficient R² favour retro σ‐bond C?C cleavage regenerating 4 , which subsequently closes on C_A providing 6,6‐bicyclic alkoxides ( 6 ). Computational modelling (CBS‐QB3) indicated that both pathways are viable and of similar energies. Reaction of 6 with H⁺ gave 1,2‐dihydronaphthalen‐1‐ols, or under dehydrating conditions, 2‐aryl‐1‐alkynylnaphthlenes. Enolates 5 react in situ with: H₂O, D₂O, I₂, allylbromide, S₂Me₂, CO₂ and lead to the expected C ‐E derivatives (E=H, D, I, allyl, SMe, CO₂H) in 49–64 % yield directly from intermediate 5 . The parents (E=H; R¹=SiMe₃, tBu; R²=Ph) are versatile starting materials for NaBH₄ and Grignard C=O additions, desilylation (when R¹=SiMe) and oxime formation. The latter allows formation of 6,9‐bicyclics via Beckmann rearrangement. The 6,8‐ring iodides are suitable Suzuki precursors for Pd‐catalysed C?C coupling (81–87 %), whereas the carboxylic acids readily form amides under T3P® conditions (71–95 %).     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Some Novel Trialkylsilyl‐substituted Lithium Benzyl Complexes [Li(tmeda)][CHRSiMe2R′] (R = Ph, 3,5‐Me2C6H3; R′ = Me,tBu, Ph)

The reactions of PhCH₂SiMe₃ ( 1 ), PhCH₂SiMe₂^tBu ( 2 ), PhCH₂SiMe₂Ph ( 3 ), 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃CH₂SiMe₃ ( 4 ), and 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃CH₂SiMe₂^tBu ( 5 ) with ⁿBuLi in tetramethylethylenediamine (tmeda) afford the corresponding lithium complexes [Li(tmeda)][CHRSiMe₂R′] (R, R′ = Ph, Me ( 6 ), Ph, ^tBu ( 7 ), Ph, Ph ( 8 ), 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃, Me ( 9 ), and 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃, ^tBu ( 10 )), respectively. The new compounds 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 and 10 have been characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, compounds 7 , 8 and 9 also by X‐ray structure analysis.     

P‐Aminophosphaalkenes with C‐Isopropyldimethylsilyl Groups

Amination of the C‐isopropyldimethylsilyl P‐chlorophosphaalkene (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PCl ( 1 ) leads to the P‐aminophosphaalkenes (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(R)R′ (R, R′ = Me ( 2 ), R = H, R′ = nPr ( 3 ), R = H, R′ = iPr ( 4 ), R = H, R′ = tBu ( 5 ), R = H, R′ = 1‐Ada ( 6 ), R = H, R′ = CPh₃ ( 7 ), R = H, R′ = Ph ( 8 ), R = H, RR′ = 2,6‐iPr₂Ph (= DIP) ( 10 ), R = H, R′ = 2,4,6‐Me₃Ph (= Mes) ( 11 ), R = H, R′ = 2,4,6‐tBu₃Ph (= Mes*)] ( 12 ), R = H, R′ = SiMe₃ ( 13 ), and R, R′ = SiMe₂Ph (1 4 ). ³¹P‐NMR spectra confirm that phosphaalkenes 2 – 7 and 10 – 14 are monomeric in solution; the structures of 7 , 10 , and 12 were determined by X‐ray crystallography. Freshly prepared (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(H)Ph ( 8 ) is a monomer that dimerizes with (N→C) proton migration within several hours to the stable diazadiphosphetidine [(iPrMe₂Si)₂CHPNPh]₂ ( 9 ). NMR‐scale reactions of deprotonated 5 and 13 with tBuiPrPCl provide by P–P bond formation the P‐phosphanyl iminophosphoranes [(iPrMe₂Si)₂C=](RN=)PPtBu(iPr) [R = tBu ( 15 ), R = Me₃Si ( 17 )]. Deprotonated 5 and Me₃GeCl deliver by N–Ge bond formation the aminophosphaalkene (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(tBu)GeMe₃ ( 20 ), which with elemental selenium 5 undergoes (N→C) proton migration to form the alkyl(imino)(seleno)phosphorane [(iPrMe₂Si)₂CH](tBuN=)P=Se ( 21 ), which is a selenium‐bridged cyclic dimer in the solid state.     

Synthesis,structure and antitumor activity of dibutyltin oxide complex with 5‐fluorouracil derivatives

The dibutyltin(IV) oxide complex reacts with 5‐fluorouracil‐l‐propanonic or5‐fluorouracil‐1‐acetic acid to give the potential antitumor activity complexes [(5‐fluorouracil)‐1‐(CH₂)_mCOOSn(Bu‐n)₂]₄O₂[m = 1, (1); m = 2, (2)] which were determined by IR and ¹H NMR. The crystal structure determination shows that complex 2 is a dimmer, in which two [(5‐fluorouracil)‐1‐CH₂CH₂COOSn(Bu‐n)₂]₂O units are linked by bridging oxygen atom, and the tin atoms adopt distorted trigonal bipyramids via two carbons from dibutyl group and three oxygen atoms from 5‐fluorouracil and bridging oxygen. In vitro test shows complexes 1 and 2 exhibit high cytotoxicity against OVCAR‐3 and PC‐14.     

Creating Iron– and Rhenium–Bismuth Bonds by Reactions with Organometallic Hydrides

While addition of [Cp₂ReH] to [Bi(OtBu)₃] leads to an equilibrium containing [Cp₂Re‐Bi(OtBu)₂], [{Cp₂Re}₂Bi(OtBu)], tBuOH and [CpRe(μ‐η⁵,η¹‐C₅H₄)Bi–ReCp₂], in the presence of water [{(Cp₂Re)₂Bi}₂O] ( 1 ) is formed selectively. Also [FpH] [Fp = (η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Fe] can be employed as a precursor to form heterometallic bismuth compounds. Synthesis of [FpBi{OCH(CF₃)₂}₂]₂ ( 5 ) can be achieved by reaction of [FpH] with [Bi{OCH(CF₃)₂}₃(thf)]₂ and carboxylates [FpBi(O₂CR)₂]₂ are generated upon treatment of [FpH] with [Bi(O₂CR)₃] (R = CH₃, tBu). While the compounds [Fp‐Bi(O₂CR)₂]₂ can also be obtained from reactions with Fp‐Fp, they are formed far more readily using [FpH] as the precursor. They typically crystallize as dimers, like the alkoxide 5 . A monomeric compound of the type [Fp‐BiX₂] ( 6 ) could be isolated for X = thd (tetramethylheptanedionate), that is, after the reaction of [FpH] with [Bi(thd)₃]. Altogether, the results demonstrate the potential of [FpH] as a precursor for [Fp‐BiX₂] compounds, which are formed in reactions with bismuth alkoxides, carboxylates and diketonates.     

Self‐Assembly of Discrete Copper(I)‐Halide Complexes with Diacylthioureas

Three diacylthioureas 1,4‐C₆H₄[C(O)NHC(S)NHAr]₂ (Ar = 2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) ( L¹ , 1 ), 1,3‐C₆H₄[C(O)NHC(S)NHAr]₂ ( L² , 2 ), and 1,3‐C₆H₄[C(O)NHC(S)NHAr′]₂ (Ar′ = 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃) ( L³ , 3 ) were synthesized and characterized. The Cu^I complexes from the reactions of bipodal ligands Lⁿ with CuX (X = Cl, Br, I) were structurally investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction methods. Treatment of L¹ with CuX gave the metallamacrocyclic complexes ( L¹ CuX)₂ [X = Cl ( 4 ), Br ( 5 ), I ( 6 )] with the ligand to metal in a ratio of 2:2, where both sulfur and halide anions function as terminal substituents. In contrast, when L² or L³ was reacted with CuBr, the two Lⁿ ligands coordinate to four copper atoms each in a bridging and terminal fashion to yield [ Lⁿ (CuBr)₂]₂ [n = 2 ( 7 ), 3 ( 8 )]. The obtained S₄Cu₄Br₄ core contains all four bromide anions in bridging positions. The reaction of L³ with CuX (X = Cl, I) gave the 3:3 trinuclear complexes ( L³ CuX)₃ [X = Cl ( 9 ) I ( 10 )], interconnected by halide bridges. The obtained diacylthioureas ( 1 – 3 ) and their Cu^I complexes ( 4 – 10 ) were also characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy.     

Organotin(IV) Carboxylates of Substituted α‐Cinnamic Acid,RnSn(OCOC(R2)=CHR1)4 – n: Synthesis,Spectroscopic Characterization and Biological Evaluation

Di‐ and triorganotin(IV) carboxylates, R_nSn(OCOC(R²)=CHR¹)_4–n (n = 2 and 3; R = Me, Et, n‐Bu, Ph; R¹ = 3‐CH₃O‐4‐OHC₆H₃, R² = C₆H₅) were prepared by reacting the corresponding organotin(IV) chloride with the silver salt of the (E)‐3‐(4‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxyphenyl)‐2‐phenylpropenoic acid. The title compounds were investigated and characterized by elemental analysis, infrared (FT‐IR), multinuclear (¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn) NMR, and mass spectrometry, and possible structures were proposed. The complexes and ligand acid ( HL ) have been evaluated in vitro against various bacteria and fungi. The results noticed during the biocidal activity screenings proved their in vitro biological potential. They were also tested for cytotoxicity.     

Manganese‐σ‐Borane Complexes from Dihaloboranes

The hydride complex K[(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Mn(CO)₂H] reacted with a range of dihalo(organyl)boranes X₂BR (X = Cl, Br; R = tBu,Mes, Ferrocenyl) to give the corresponding borane complexes[(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Mn(CO)₂(HB(X)R)]., The presence of a hydride in bridging position between manganese and boron was deduced from ¹¹B decoupled ¹H NMR spectra. Additionally, the structure of the tert‐butyl borane complex was confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

DFT/TDDFT studies of the ancillary ligand effects on structures and photophysical properties of rhenium (I) tricarbonyl complexes with the imidazo[4,5‐f]‐1,10‐phenanthroline ligand

The seven rhenium (I) tricarbonyl complexes having a general formula fac‐[ReBr(CO)₃(R₁,R₂,R₃‐N^{^}N)] (N^{^}N = imidazo[4,5‐f]‐1,10‐phenanthroline; R₁ = ? ^tBu, R₂ = R₃ = ? H, 1 ; R₁ = ? C?CH, R₂ = R₃ = ? H, 2 ; R₁ = ? ^tBu, R₂ = ? C?CH, R₃ = ? H, 3 ; R₁ = ? ^tBu, R₂ = R₃ = ? C?CH, 4 ; R₁ = ? ^tBu, R₂ = ? CH₃, R₃ = ? H, 5 ; R₁ = ? ^tBu, R₂ = R₃ = ? CH₃, 6 ; R₁ = ? ^tBu, R₂ = ? OCH₃, R₃ = ? H, 7 ) have been investigated theoretically by density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) methods. The different substituted groups on N^{^}N ligand induce changes on the electronic structures and photophysical properties for these complexes. It is found that the introduction of ? C?C decreases the energy level of lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) while the introduction of ? CH₃ or ? OCH₃ lead to increase the energy level of LUMO. The order of LUMO energy level rising is in line with the increasing of donating abilities of substituted groups; and the influence of R₂ position is greater than that of R₁ position on LUMO energy level. The lowest energy absorption bands have changes in the order of 7 < 6 < 5 < 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 . These results of electronic affinity (EA), ionization potential (IP), and reorganization energy (λ) indicate that all of these complexes can be used as electron transporting materials. Moreover, the smallest difference between λ_electron and λ_hole of 4 indicates that it is better to be used as an emitter in the organic light‐emitting diodes. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Functionalised Tris(pyrazolyl)methane Ligands and Re(CO)3 Complexes Thereof

The synthesis of new tripodal nitrogen ligands derived from tris(pyrazolyl)methane (Tpm^R, R = H, tBu, Ph in 3‐position) is described. After deprotonation of the parent tris(pyrazolyl)methane Tpm^R, the carbanion reacts readily with ethylene oxide to yield the 3,3,3‐tris(3′‐substituted pyrazolyl)propanol ligands[(3‐Rpz)₃CCH₂CH₂OH, R = H, tBu, Ph, 1a – c ]. These ligands can be easily derivatised at the alcohol function. Microwave‐assisted reactions of these ligands and [Re(CO)₅Br] yields the complex [( 1a )Re(CO)₃]Br ( 4 ) in the case of ligand 1a , whereas in the case of the substituted ligands 1b and 1c degradation was observed. The degradation products are identified as [(Hpz^R)₂Re(CO)₃Br] [R = tBu ( 7b ), Ph ( 7c )]. These complexes were also prepared directly from [Re(CO)₅Br] and the corresponding pyrazoles by microwave‐assisted synthesis. The Re(CO)₃ complexes 4 and [( 1a )Re(CO)₃]OTf ( 5 ) are water‐soluble. The structures of 5· H₂O and [{(pz)₃CCH₂CH₃}Re(CO)₃]OTf · 1.5H₂O · ¹/₂CH₃CN ( 6· 1.5H₂O · ¹/₂CH₃CN) as well as the structure of 7b have been elucidated by X‐ray crystallography.     

CO2 Fixation and Transformation by a Dinuclear Copper Cryptate under Acidic Conditions

CO₂ fixation and transformation by metal complexes continuously receive attention from the viewpoint of carbon resources and environmental concerns. We found that the dinuclear copper(II) cryptate [Cu₂L¹](ClO₄)₄ ( 1 ; L¹=N[(CH₂)₂NHCH₂(m‐C₆H₄)CH₂NH‐(CH₂)₂]₃N) can easily take up atmospheric CO₂ even under weakly acidic conditions at room temperature and convert it from bicarbonate into carbonate monoesters in alcohol solution. The compounds [Cu₂L¹(μ‐O₂COH)](ClO₄)₃ ( 2 ), [Cu₂L¹(μ‐O₂COR)](ClO₄)₃ ( 3 : R=CH₃; 4 : R=C₂H₅; 5 : R=C₃H₇; 6 : R=C₄H₉; 7 : R=C₅H₁₁; 8 : R=CH₂CH₂OH), [Cu₂L¹(μ‐O₂CCH₃)](ClO₄)₃ ( 9 ), and [Cu₂L¹(OH₂)(NO₃)](NO₃)₃ ( 10 ) were characterized by IR spectroscopy and ESI‐MS. The crystal structures of 2 – 6 and 10 were studied by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. On the basis of the crystal structures, solution studies, and DFT calculations, a possible mechanism for CO₂ fixation and transformation is given.     

Triaquatris(μ‐oxydiacetato)dipraseodymium(III) pentahydrate and hexaaquatris(μ‐oxydiacetato)dineodymium(III) oxydiacetic acid solvate dihydrate

Two new complexes of the Ln₂(oda)₃·nH₂O (oda =–O₂CCH₂OCH₂CO₂–) series are reported, i.e. {[Pr₂(C₄H₄O₅)₃(H₂O)₃]·5H₂O}_n and {[Nd₂(C₄H₄O₅)₃(H₂O)₆]·C₄H₆O₅·‐2H₂O}_n. The former is isostructural with the reported La analogue, while the latter is a new structural variety within the series. Each compound exhibits two independent nine‐coordinated Ln centres showing a variety of coordination geometries.     

π‐Complexes of Copper(I) with Terminal Alkynes. Synthesis and Crystal Structure of [(HC≡CCH2NH3)(Cu2Br3)] π‐Complex

Crystals of the zwitterionic copper(I) π‐complex [(HC≡CCH₂NH₃)Cu₂Br₃] have been synthesized by interaction of CuBr with [HC≡CCH₂NH₃]Br in aqueous solution (pH < 1) and X‐ray studied. The crystals are monoclinic: space group P2₁/n, a = 6.722(4), b = 12.818(8), c = 9.907(3) Å, β = 100.25(4)°, V = 840.0(8) ų, Z = 4, R = 0.0592 for 3015 reflections. The crystal structure of the π‐complex contains isolated [(HC≡CCH₂NH₃)⁺(Cu₂Br₃)^?]₂ units which are incorporated into a framework by strong hydrogen N–H···Br and C≡C–H···Br bonds. The length of π‐coordinated propargylammonium C≡C bond is equal 1.216(8) Å and Cu(I)–(C≡C) distance equals 1.958(5) Å.     

Reactions of Tri‐tert‐butylazadiboriridine NB2R3 with Carbonyl and Similar Species

The carbonyl group of X(R')CO is added to the B—B bond of the three‐membered ring compound NB₂R₃ ( 1 ; R = tBu) to give the five‐membered rings [—BR—NR—BR—X(Rapos;)C—O—] ( 2a — d ; Rapos;/X = tBu/H, Ph/Ph, H/OMe, H/NMe₂). The tetraazoniatetraboratatricyclo[6.2.0.0^{3, 6}]deca‐2, 4, 7, 9‐tetraenes N₄B₄C₂R₆Rapos;₂ ( 4a , b ; Rapos; = Me, Et), known products from the reaction of 1 with isonitriles CNRapos;, undergo a rearrangement to give the corresponding deca‐1, 4, 6, 9‐tetraenes 6a , b by the migration of two tBu groups from boron to carbon on photolysis; the structure of 6a is confirmed by X‐ray analysis. The reaction of CO, generated from carbonylmetal complexes (photolytically from [Cr(CO)₆] or [Cp₂Fe₂(CO)₄]; thermally from [Fe₂(CO)₉] or [Co₂(CO)₈]), with 1 gives the 3, 7‐dioxonia‐1, 5‐diazonia‐2, 4, 6, 8‐tetraboratanaphtalene O₂N₂C₂B₄R₆ ( 7 ), as has been known from the reaction of [Fe(CO)₅] and 1 . The product 7 is also obtained from the isomeric dispiro compound 5 , the known product from the reaction of 1 with gaseous CO at —78 °C, by standing in solution at room temperature. Surprisingly, the reaction of 1 with CO from the photolysis of [CpMn(CO)₃] gives a naphthalene‐type isomer of 7 , the 1, 5‐dioxonia‐3, 7‐diazonia species 8 , the crystal structure of which is reported.     

15N NMR spectroscopy of 3‐substituted 5‐trichloromethyl‐1,2‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazolium chlorides

¹⁵N NMR data of a series of 3‐alkyl[aryl] substituted 5‐trichloromethyl‐1,2‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazolium chlorides (where the 3‐substituents are H, Me, Et, n‐Pr, n‐Bu, n‐Pe, n‐Hex, (CH₂)₅CO₂Et, CH₂Br, Ph and 4‐Br‐C₆H₄), are reported. The ¹⁵N substituent chemical shifts (SCS) parameters are determined and these data are compared with the ¹³C SCS values and data obtained by MO calculations. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesis of novel zirconium complexes bearing mono‐Cp and tridentate Schiff base [ONO] ligands and their catalytic activities for olefin polymerization

A series of novel zirconium complexes {R²Cp[2‐R¹‐6‐(2‐CH₃OC₆H₄N?CH)C₆H₃O]ZrCl₂ ( 1 , R¹ = H, R² = H, 2 : R¹ = CH₃, R² = H; 3 , R¹ = ^tBu, R² = H; 4 , R¹ = H, R² = CH₃; 5 , R¹ = H, R² = n‐Bu)} bearing mono‐Cp and tridentate Schiff base [ONO] ligands are prepared by the reaction of corresponding lithium salt of Schiff base ligands with R²CpZrCl₃·DME. All complexes were well characterized by ¹H NMR, MS, IR and elemental analysis. The molecular structure of complex 1 was further confirmed by X‐ray diffraction study, where the bond angle of Cl? Zr? Cl is extremely wide [151.71(3)°]. A nine‐membered zirconoxacycle complex Cp(O? 2? C₆H₄N?CHC₆H₄‐2? O)ZrCl₂ ( 6 ) can be obtained by an intramolecular elimination of CH₃Cl from complex 1 or by the reaction of CpZrCl₃·DME with dilithium salt of ligand. When activated by excess methylaluminoxane (MAO), complexes 1–6 exhibit high catalytic activities for ethylene polymerization. The influence of polymerization temperature on the activities of ethylene polymerization is investigated, and these complexes show high thermal stability. Complex 6 is also active for the copolymerization of ethylene and 1‐hexene with low 1‐hexene incorporation ability (1.10%). Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.