Derivations nilpotent on subsets of prime rings

ABSTRACT

Let D be a division algebra with center F. Consider the group CK ₁(D) = D*/F*D′ where D* is the group of invertible elements of D and D′ is its commutator subgroup. In this note we shall show that, assuming a division algebra D is a product of cyclic algebras, the group CK ₁(D) is trivial if and only if D is an ordinary quaternion algebra over a real Pythagorean field F. We also characterize the cyclic central simple algebras with trivial CK ₁ and show that CK ₁ is not trivial for division algebras of index 4. Using valuation theory, the group CK ₁(D) is computed for some valued division algebras.

     

On Galois Algebras Satisfying the Fundamental Theorem

Let B be a Galois algebra over a commutative ring R with Galois group G such that B ^H is a separable subalgebra of B for each subgroup H of G. Then it is shown that B satisfies the fundamental theorem if and only if B is one of the following three types: (1) B is an indecomposable commutative Galois algebra, (2) B = Re ⊕ R(1 ? e) where e and 1 ? e are minimal central idempotents in B, and (3) B is an indecomposable Galois algebra such that for each separable subalgebra A, V _B (A) = ?∑ _g∈G(A) J _g , and the centers of A and B ^G(A) are the same where V _B (A) is the commutator subring of A in B, J _g  = {b ∈ B | bx = g(x)b for each x ∈ B} for a g ∈ G, and G(A) = {g ∈ G | g(a) = a for all a ∈ A}.     

Lie Triple Derivable Mappings on Rings

Let ? be a ring containing a nontrivial idempotent. In this article, under a mild condition on ?, we prove that if δ is a Lie triple derivable mapping from ? into ?, then there exists a Z _{A, B} (depending on A and B) in its centre 𝒵(?) such that δ(A + B) = δ(A) + δ(B) + Z _{A, B} . In particular, let ? be a prime ring of characteristic not 2 containing a nontrivial idempotent. It is shown that, under some mild conditions on ?, if δ is a Lie triple derivable mapping from ? into ?, then δ = D + τ, where D is an additive derivation from ? into its central closure T and τ is a mapping from ? into its extended centroid 𝒞 such that τ(A + B) = τ(A) + τ(B) + Z _{A, B} and τ([[A, B], C]) = 0 for all A, B, C ∈ ?.     

On the First Galois Cohomology Group of the Algebraic Group SL1(D)

Let A be a central simple algebra over a field F. Denote the reduced norm of A over F by Nrd: A* → F* and its kernel by SL₁(A). For a field extension K of F, we study the first Galois Cohomology group H ¹(K,SL₁(A)) by two methods, valuation theory for division algebras and K-theory. We shall show that this group fails to be stable under purely transcendental extension and formal Laurent series.     

A Note on K-Theory of Azumaya Algebras

For an Azumaya algebra A which is free over its centre R, we prove that K-theory of A is isomorphic to K-theory of R up to its rank torsions. We conclude that K _i (A, ?/m) = K _i (R, ?/m) for any m relatively prime to the rank and i ≥ 0. This covers, for example, K-theory of division algebras, K-theory of Azumaya algebras over semilocal rings, and K-theory of graded central simple algebras indexed by a totally ordered abelian group.     

Compact Exceptional Simple Kantor Triple Systems Defined on Tensor Products of Composition Algebras∗

In this article we give the classification of compact exceptional simple Kantor triple systems defined on tensor products of composition algebras A =  ₁?  ₂ such that their Kantor algebras ?(φ, A) are real forms of exceptional simple Lie algebras.     

On Derived Equivalences for Selfinjective Algebras

We show that if A is a representation-finite selfinjective Artin algebra, then every P ^? ? K ^b(𝒫 _A ) with Hom _K(Mod?A)(P ^?,P ^?[i]) = 0 for i ≠ 0 and add(P ^?) = add(νP ^?) is a direct summand of a tilting complex, and that if A, B are derived equivalent representation-finite selfinjective Artin algebras, then there exists a sequence of selfinjective Artin algebras A = B ₀, B ₁,…, B _m  = B such that, for any 0 ≤ i < m, B _i+1 is the endomorphism algebra of a tilting complex for B _i of length ≤ 1.     

Solvability of universal bol 2-loops

ABSTRACT

Let (A, ^?) be a structurable algebra. Then the opposite algebra (A ^op , ^?) is structurable, and we show that the triple system B ^op _A(x, y, z):=V^opx,y(z)=x(y¯z)+z(y¯x)?y(x¯z), x, y, z ∈ A, is a Kantor triple system (or generalized Jordan triple system of the second order) satisfying the condition (A). Furthermore, if A=𝔸₁?𝔸₂ denotes tensor products of composition algebras, (^?) is the standard conjugation, and (^∧) denotes a certain pseudoconjugation on A, we show that the triple systems B ^op _𝔸1?𝔸2 ( x , y¯^∧, z) are models of compact Kantor triple systems. Moreover these triple systems are simple if (dim𝔸₁, dim𝔸₂) ≠ (2, 2). In addition, we obtain an explicit formula for the canonical trace form for compact Kantor triple systems defined on tensor products of composition algebras.     

On Stable Equivalence of Tensor Products of Algebras

The paper investigates the following problem. Let bimodules N, M yield a stable equivalence of Morita type between self-injective K-algebras A and E. Further, let bimodules S, T yield a stable equivalence of Morita type between self-injective K-algebras B and F. Then we want to know whether the functor M ? _A  ? ? _B S: mod(A ? _K B ^op ) → mod(E ? _K F ^op ) induces a stable equivalence between A ? _K B ^op and E ? _K F ^op . There is given a reduction of this problem to some smaller subcategories for self-injective algebras. Moreover, new invariants of stable equivalences of Morita type are constructed in a general case of arbitrary finite-dimensional algebras over a field.     

On the Factorial Closure of Certain Monomial Modules

Abstract

Let R = K[y ₁,…,y _t ] be an affine domain over a field K and I be a nonzero proper ideal of R. In Sec. 1 of this note, we characterize when (K + I, R) is a Mori pair. In Sec. 2 of this note, we prove the following theorem: Let A ? B be domains such that C/Q is Mori for each subring C of B containing A and for any prime ideal Q of C. Then dim A ? 1 ≤ dim B ≤ dim A + 1 and if dim A > 1 or dim B > 1 then dim A = dim B.     

On the Semigroup Algebra of Binary Relations

The semigroup of binary relations on {1,…, n} with the relative product is isomorphic to the semigroup B _n of n × n zero-one matrices with the Boolean matrix product. Over any field F, we prove that the semigroup algebra FB _n contains an ideal K _n of dimension (2 ⁿ  ? 1)², and we construct an explicit isomorphism of K _n with the matrix algebra M _{2 ⁿ ?1}(F).     

Categorical Abstract Algebraic Logic: Local Characterization Theorems for Classes of Systems

Let ? = ?F, R, ρ? be a system language. Given a class of ?-systems K and an ?-algebraic system A = ?SEN,?N,F??, i.e., a functor SEN: Sign → Set, with N a category of natural transformations on SEN, and F:F → N a surjective functor preserving all projections, define the collection K _A of A-systems in K as the collection of all members of K of the form 𝔄 = ? SEN,?N,F?,R ^𝔄 ?, for some set of relation systems R ^𝔄 on SEN. Taking after work of Czelakowski and Elgueta in the context of the model theory of equality-free first-order logic, several relationships between closure properties of the class K, on the one hand, and local properties of K _A and global properties connecting K _A and K _A′, whenever there exists an ?-morphism ? F,α? : A → A′, on the other, are investigated. In the main result of the article, it is shown, roughly speaking, that K _A is an algebraic closure system, for every ?-algebraic system A, provided that K is closed under subsystems and reduced products.     

Quasi-Frobenius Corings and Quasi-Frobenius Extensions

In this article, the notions of a Frobenius pair of functors and Frobenius corings are generalized to an l-QF pair of functors and l-QF corings. We prove that an extension ι:B → A is left quasi-Frobenius if and only if (F ₁,G ₁) is an l-QF pair of functors, where F ₁: _A ? →  _B ? is the restriction of scalars functors, and G ₁ = A? _{B ^?} : _B ? →  _A ? is the induction functor. For an A-coring , we prove that  is an l-QF coring if and only if A → ? is an l-QF extension and _A  is a finitely generated projective modules if and only if (G ₂,F ₂) is an l-QF pair of functors, where G ₂ =  ? _{A ^?} : _A ? →  ? is the induction functor, F ₂:  ? →  _A ? is the forgetful functor, the result of Brzezinski is generalized.     

Derivation Simple Color Algebras and Semisimple Lie Color Algebras

Let K be an algebraically closed field of arbitrary characteristic and Γ an abelian multiplicative group equipped with a bicharacter ε: Γ × Γ → K*. It is proved that, for any finite-dimensional derivation simple color algebra A over K, there exists a simple color algebra S and a color vector space V such that A? S? S^ε(V), where S^ε(V) is the ε-symmetric algebra of V. As an application of this result, a necessary and sufficient condition such that a Lie color algebra is semisimple is obtained.     

Formally Real Involutions on Central Simple Algebras

An involution # on an associative ring R is formally real if a sum of nonzero elements of the form r ^# r where r ? R is nonzero. Suppose that R is a central simple algebra (i.e., R = M _n (D) for some integer n and central division algebra D) and # is an involution on R of the form r ^# = a ^?1 r? a, where ? is some transpose involution on R and a is an invertible matrix such that a? = ±a. In Section 1 we characterize formal reality of # in terms of a and ?| _D . In later sections we apply this result to the study of formal reality of involutions on crossed product division algebras. We can characterize involutions on D = (K/F, Φ) that extend to a formally real involution on the split algebra D ? _F K ? M _n (K). Every such involution is formally real but we show that there exist formally real involutions on D which are not of this form. In particular, there exists a formally real involution # for which the hermitian trace form x ? tr(x ^# x) is not positive semidefinite.     

Restrictions of Irreducible Representations of Classical Algebraic Groups to Root A 1-Subgroups

Abstract

Restrictions of irreducible representations of classical algebraic groups to root A ₁-subgroups, i.e., subgroups of type A ₁ generated by root subgroups associated with two opposite roots, are studied. Composition factors of such restrictions are found in the following cases: for groups of types A _n with n > 2 and D _n , for groups of type B _n , n > 2, and long root subgroups, for groups of type C _n , n > 2, and short root subgroups, and for p-restricted representations of A ₂(K), C ₂(K) (recall that B ₂(K) ? C ₂(K)), and of B _n (K), n > 2, and short root subgroups. Here we assume that p > 2 for G = B _n (K) or C _n (K).     

Ternary Derivations of Generalized Cayley–Dickson Algebras

Abstract

Ternary derivations, ternary Cayley derivations and ternary automorphisms are computed over fields of characteristic ≠ 2, 3 for the algebras A _t obtained by the Cayley–Dickson duplication process. While the derivation algebra of A _t stops growing after t = 3, the ternary derivation algebra significantly decreases in the step from the octonions A ₃ to the sedenions A ₄, revealing the symmetry lost on that stage.