Group Rings Whose Symmetric Units Generate an n-Engel Group

Let F be an infinite field of characteristic different from 2 and G a torsion group. Write 𝒰⁺(FG) for the set of units in the group ring FG that are symmetric with respect to the classical involution induced from the map g ? g ^?1, for all g ∈ G. We classify the groups such that ?𝒰⁺(FG)? is n-Engel.     

Group Algebras Satisfying a Certain Lie Identity

ABSTRACT

Let K be a field of characteristic p ≠ 2 and let G be any group. A characterization of group algebras KG satisfying the Lie identity [[x,y],[u,v],[z,t]] = 0 for all x,y,u,v,z,t ? KG is obtained.     

Relatively Free Nilpotent Torsion-Free Groups and Their Lie Algebras

Let K be a field of characteristic zero. For a torsion-free finitely generated nilpotent group G, we naturally associate four finite dimensional nilpotent Lie algebras over K, ? _K (G), grad^(?)(? _K (G)), grad^(g)(exp ? _K (G)), and L _K (G). Let 𝔗 _c be a torsion-free variety of nilpotent groups of class at most c. For a positive integer n, with n ≥ 2, let F _n (𝔗 _c ) be the relatively free group of rank n in 𝔗 _c . We prove that ? _K (F _n (𝔗 _c )) is relatively free in some variety of nilpotent Lie algebras, and ? _K (F _n (𝔗 _c )) ? L _K (F _n (𝔗 _c )) ? grad^(?)(? _K (F _n (𝔗 _c ))) ? grad^(g)(exp ? _K (F _n (𝔗 _c ))) as Lie algebras in a natural way. Furthermore, F _n (𝔗 _c ) is a Magnus nilpotent group. Let G ₁ and G ₂ be torsion-free finitely generated nilpotent groups which are quasi-isometric. We prove that if G ₁ and G ₂ are relatively free of finite rank, then they are isomorphic. Let L be a relatively free nilpotent Lie algebra over ? of finite rank freely generated by a set X. Give on L the structure of a group R, say, by means of the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula, and let H be the subgroup of R generated by the set X. We show that H is relatively free in some variety of nilpotent groups; freely generated by the set X, H is Magnus and L ? ?_?(H) ? L _?(H) as Lie algebras. For relatively free residually torsion-free nilpotent groups, we prove that ? _K and L _K are isomorphic as Lie algebras. We also give an example of a finitely generated Magnus nilpotent group G, not relatively free, such that ?_?(G) is not isomorphic to L _?(G) as Lie algebras.     

Hypercentral Unit Groups and the Hyperbolicity of a Modular Group Algebra

We classify groups G such that the unit group 𝒰 ₁(? G) is hypercentral. In the second part, we classify groups G whose modular group algebra has hyperbolic unit groups 𝒰 ₁(KG).     

Weak Cayley Table Groups II: Alternating Groups and Finite Coxeter Groups

A weak Cayley table isomorphism is a bijection φ: G → H of groups such that φ(xy) ～ φ(x)φ(y) for all x, y ∈ G. Here ～denotes conjugacy. When G = H the set of all weak Cayley table isomorphisms φ: G → G forms a group 𝒲(G) that contains the automorphism group Aut(G) and the inverse map I: G → G, x → x ^?1. Let 𝒲₀(G) = ?Aut(G), I? ≤ 𝒲(G) and say that G has trivial weak Cayley table group if 𝒲(G) = 𝒲₀(G). We show that all finite irreducible Coxeter groups (except possibly E ₈) have trivial weak Cayley table group, as well as most alternating groups. We also consider some sporadic simple groups.     

EXAMPLES OF FCR-ALGEBRAS

Abstract

Let R be a prime ring and 𝒰(R) its group of units. We prove that if 𝒰(R) satisfies a group identity and 𝒰(R) generates R,then either R is a domain or R is isomorphic to the algebra of n × n matrices over a finite field of order d. Moreover the integers n and d depend only on the group identity satisfed by 𝒰(R). This result has been recently proved by C. H. Liu and T. K. Lee (Liu,C. H.; Lee,T. K. Group identities and prime rings generated by units. Comm. Algebra (to appear)) and here we present a new different proof.     

Construction of free subgroups in the group of units of modular group algebras

Let KGbe the group algebra of a p¹ -group Gover a field Kof characteristic p > 0, and let U(KG)be its group of units. If KGcontains a nontrivial bicyclic unit and if Kis not algebraic over its prime field, then we prove that the free product Z_p? Z_p? Z_pcan be embedded in U(KG).     

Lie Nilpotent Group Algebras and Upper Lie Codimension Subgroups

In this article we introduce the series of the upper Lie codimension subgroups of a group algebra KG of a group G over a field K. By means of this series we give a contribution to the conjecture cl _L (KG) = cl ^L (KG) when G belongs to particular classes of finite p-groups.     

ON SYMMETRIC UNITS IN GROUP ALGEBRAS

Let U(KG) be the group of units of the group ring KG of the group G over a commutative ring K. The anti-automorphism g → g ^?1 of G can be extended linearly to an anti-automorphism a → a ^* of KG. Let S _* (KG) = {x ∈ U(KG) | x ^* = x} be the set of all symmetric units of U(KG). We consider the following question: for which groups G and commutative rings K it is true that S _* (KG) is a subgroup in U(KG). We answer this question when either a) G is torsion and K is a commutative G-favourable integral domain of characteristic p≥ 0 or b) G is non-torsion nilpotent group and KG is semiprime.     

Group Rings Whose Symmetric Units are Solvable

Let K be an infinite field of characteristic different from 2, and G a group. Under suitable restrictions upon G, we classify the groups such that the symmetric units of KG satisfy the solvability identity (x ₁, x ₂,…, x _{2 ⁿ} ) ^o  = 1, for some n.     

∗-Prime Group Algebras

An associative algebra R over a field K is said to be right ?-prime if for every nonzero r ? R, there exists a finitely generated subalgebra S of R such that rSt = 0 implies t = 0. Clearly, strongly prime implies ?-prime and ?-prime implies prime. A large number of examples of group algebras are given which show that the concept of ?-prime lies strictly between prime and strongly prime. A complete characterization of ?-prime group algebras is given. It is proved that a group algebra KG of the group G over the field K is ?-prime if and only if Λ⁺(G) = (1). Intersection theorems play an important role in the study. In the process, a new intersection theorem for ?-prime group algebras is obtained. Elementwise characterization of the ?-prime radical is given and its relation with some well-known radicals is discussed.     

A New Class of Generalized Thompson's Groups and Their Normal Subgroups

For a given group G and a homomorphism ?: G → G × G, we construct groups ?_?(G), 𝒯_?(G), and 𝒱_?(G) that blend Thompson's groups F, T, and V with G, respectively. Furthermore, we describe the lattice of normal subgroups of the groups ?_Δ(G), where Δ: G → G × G is the diagonal homomorphism, Δ(g) = (g, g).     

Group Laws [x,y −1] ≡ u(x,y) and Varietal Properties

Let F = ?x, y? be a free group. It is known that the commutator [x, y ^?1] cannot be expressed in terms of basic commutators, in particular in terms of Engel commutators. We show that the laws imposing such an expression define specific varietal properties. For a property 𝒫 we consider a subset U(𝒫) ? F such that every law of the form [x, y ^?1] ≡ u, u ∈ U(𝒫) provides the varietal property 𝒫. For example, we show that each subnormal subgroup is normal in every group of a variety 𝔙 if and only if 𝔙 satisfies a law of the form [x, y ^?1] ≡ u, where u ∈ [F′, ?x?].     

On Lie nilpotent modular group algebras

Let K be a field of characteristic p>0 and let KG be the group algebra of an arbitrary group G over K. It is known that if KG is Lie nilpotent, then its lower as well as upper Lie nilpotency index is at least p+1. The group algebras KG for which these indices are p+1 or 2p or 3p?1 or 4p?2 have already been determined. In this paper, we classify the group algebras KG for which the upper Lie nilpotency index is 5p?3, 6p?4 or 7p?5.     

Relative Group Cohomology and The Orbit Category

Let G be a finite group and ? be a family of subgroups of G closed under conjugation and taking subgroups. We consider the question whether there exists a periodic relative ?-projective resolution for ? when ? is the family of all subgroups H ≤ G with rk H ≤ rkG ? 1. We answer this question negatively by calculating the relative group cohomology ?H*(G, 𝔽₂) where G = ?/2 × ?/2 and ? is the family of cyclic subgroups of G. To do this calculation we first observe that the relative group cohomology ?H*(G, M) can be calculated using the ext-groups over the orbit category of G restricted to the family ?. In second part of the paper, we discuss the construction of a spectral sequence that converges to the cohomology of a group G and whose horizontal line at E ₂ page is isomorphic to the relative group cohomology of G.     

A Lower Bound on the Second Fiber Coefficient of the Fiber Cones

Let (R, 𝔪) be a Cohen–Macaulay local ring of dimension d > 0, I an 𝔪-primary ideal of R and K an ideal containing I. When depth G(I) ≥ d ? 1 and r(I | K) < ∞, we present a lower bound on the second fiber coefficient of the fiber cones, and also provide a characterization, in terms of f ₂(I, K), of the condition depth F _K (I) ≥ d ? 1.     

Lie *-Nilpotence of Group Rings

Let KG be the group ring of a group G over a field K. Let * be an involution of a group G extended linearly to the group ring KG. Suppose that G is a torsion group without 2-elements and K is a field with characteristic different from 2. We prove that KG is Lie *-nilpotent if and only if KG is Lie nilpotent.     

Fiber Coefficients and Depth of Fiber Cones

Let (R, 𝔪) be a Cohen–Macaulay local ring of dimension d > 0, I an 𝔪-primary ideal of R, and K an ideal containing I. When r(I | K)<∞, we give a lower bound and an upper bound for f ₁(I). Under the above assumption on r(I | K) and depth G(I) ≥ d ? 1, we also provide a characterization, in terms of f ₁(I), of the condition depth F _K (I) ≥ d ? 1.