Generalized Skew Derivations with Power Central Values on Lie Ideals

Let R be a prime ring with center Z and L a noncommutative Lie ideal of R. Suppose that f is a right generalized β-derivation of R associated with a β-derivation δ such that f(x) ⁿ  ∈ Z for all x ∈ L, where n is a fixed positive integer. Then f = 0 unless dim  _C RC = 4.     

On the Centralizers of Derivations with Engel Conditions

Let R be a noncommutative prime ring and d, δ two nonzero derivations of R. If δ([d(x), x] _n ) = 0 for all x ∈ R, then char R = 2, d ² = 0, and δ = αd, where α is in the extended centroid of R. As an application, if char R ≠ 2, then the centralizer of the set {[d(x), x] _n  | x ∈ R} in R coincides with the center of R.     

Power Values of Derivations with Annihilator Conditions on Lie Ideals in Prime Rings

Let R be a prime ring of char R ≠ 2, d a nonzero derivation of R, U a noncentral Lie ideal of R, and a ∈ R. If au ^{n ₁} d(u) ^{n ₂} u ^{n ₃} d(u) ^{n ₄} u ^{n ₅} … d(u) ^{n _k?1} u ^{n _k}  = 0 for all u ∈ U, where n ₁, n ₂,…,n _k are fixed non-negative integers not all zero, then a = 0 and if a(u ^s d(u)u ^t ) ⁿ  ∈ Z(R) for all u ∈ U, where s ≥ 0, t ≥ 0, n ≥ 1 are some fixed integers, then either a = 0 or R satisfies S ₄, the standard identity in four variables.     

Generalized Derivations with Engel Conditions on One-Sided Ideals

Let R be a noncommutative prime ring and I a nonzero left ideal of R. Let g be a generalized derivation of R such that [g(r ^k ), r ^k ] _n  = 0 for all r ∈ I, where k, n are fixed positive integers. Then there exists c ∈ U, the left Utumi quotient ring of R, such that g(x) = xc and I(c ? α) = 0 for a suitable α ∈ C. In particular we have that g(x) = α x, for all x ∈ I.     

Left Annihilators of Commutators with Derivation on Right Ideals

Abstract

Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2, d a non-zero derivation of R, I a non-zero right ideal of R, a ∈ R, S ₄(x ₁,…, x ₄) the standard polynomial in 4 variables. Suppose that, for any x, y ∈ I, a[d([x, y]), [x, y]] = 0. If S ₄(I, I, I, I)I ≠ 0, then aI = ad(I) = 0.     

Annihilators of Skew Derivations with Engel Conditions on Lie Ideals

Let R be a prime ring, L a noncentral Lie ideal of R, and a ∈ R. Set [x, y]₁ = [x, y] = xy ? yx for x, y ∈ R and inductively [x, y]_k = [[x, y]_k?1, y] for k > 1. Suppose that δ is a nonzero σ-derivation of R such that a[δ(x), x]_k = 0 for all x ∈ L, where σ is an automorphism of R and k is a fixed positive integer. Then a = 0 except when char R = 2 and R ? M₂(F), the 2 × 2 matrix ring over a field F.     

Power-Centralizing Automorphisms of Lie Ideals in Prime Rings

Let R be a prime ring with center Z, L a noncentral Lie ideal of R, and σ a nontrivial automorphism of R such that [u ^σ,u] ⁿ  ∈ Z for all u ∈ L. If either char(R) > n or char(R) = 0, then R satisfies s ₄, the standard identity in 4 variables.     

Cohomology of general coinduced representions

ABSTRACT

Let R be a prime ring with a nonzero derivation d and let f(X ₁,…,X _t ) be a multilinear polynomial over C, the extended centroid of R. Suppose that b[d(f(x ₁,…,x _t )), f(x ₁,…,x _t )] _n  = 0 for all x _i  ∈ R, where 0 ≠ b ∈ R and n is a fixed positive integer. Then f(X ₁,…,X _t ) is centrally valued on R unless char R = 2 and dim _C RC = 4. We prove a more generalized version by replacing R with a left ideal.     

Prime T-Ideals in Polynomial and Power Series Rings Over a Pseudo-Valuation Domain

Let R be an m-dimensional pseudo-valuation domain with residue field k, let V be the associated valuation domain with residue field K, and let k ₀ be the maximal separable extension of k in K. We compute the t-dimension of polynomial and power series rings over R. It is easy to see that t-dim R[x ₁,…, x _n ] = 2 if m = 1 and K is transcendental over k, but equals m otherwise, and that t-dim R[[x ₁,…, x _n ]] = ∞ if R is a nonSFT-ring. When R is an SFT-ring, we also show that: (1) t-dim R[[x]] = m; (2) t-dim R[[x ₁,…, x _n ]] = 2m ? 1, if n ≥ 2, K has finite exponent over k ₀, and [k ₀: k] < ∞; (3) t-dim R[[x ₁,…, x _n ]] = 2m, otherwise.     

m-Power Commuting MAPS on Semiprime Rings

Let R be a semiprime ring with center Z(R), extended centroid C, U the maximal right ring of quotients of R, and m a positive integer. Let f: R → U be an additive m-power commuting map. Suppose that f is Z(R)-linear. It is proved that there exists an idempotent e ∈ C such that ef(x) = λx + μ(x) for all x ∈ R, where λ ∈C and μ: R → C. Moreover, (1 ? e)U ? M₂(E), where E is a complete Boolean ring. As consequences of the theorem, it is proved that every additive, 2-power commuting map or centralizing map from R to U is commuting.     

An Annihilator Condition with Generalized Derivations on Multilinear Polynomials

Let R be a non-commutative prime ring of characteristic different from 2, U its right Utumi quotient ring, C its extended centroid, F a generalized derivation on R, and f(x ₁,…, x _n ) a noncentral multilinear polynomial over C. If there exists a ∈ R such that, for all r ₁,…, r _n  ∈ R, a[F ²(f(r ₁,…, r _n )), f(r ₁,…, r _n )] = 0, then one of the following statements hold: 1. a = 0;

2. There exists λ ∈C such that F(x) = λx, for all x ∈ R;

3. There exists c ∈ U such that F(x) = cx, for all x ∈ R, with c ² ∈ C;

4. There exists c ∈ U such that F(x) = xc, for all x ∈ R, with c ² ∈ C.

     

Jordan τ-derivations of Prime Rings

Let R be a prime ring which is not commutative, with maximal symmetric ring of quotients Q _ms (R), and let τ be an anti-automorphism of R. An additive map δ: R → Q _ms (R) is called a Jordan τ-derivation if δ(x ²) = δ(x)x ^τ + xδ(x) for all x ∈ R. A Jordan τ-derivation of R is called X-inner if it is of the form x → ax ^τ ? xa for x ∈ R, where a ∈ Q _ms (R). It is proved that any Jordan τ-derivation of R is X-inner if either R is not a GPI-ring or R is a PI-ring except when charR = 2 and dim  _C RC = 4, where C is the extended centroid of R.     

On Pseudo-Almost Valuation Domains

Let R be an integral domain with quotient field K and integral closure R ^′. Anderson and Zafrullah called R an “almost valuation domain” if for every nonzero x ∈ K, there is a positive integer n such that either x ⁿ  ∈ R or x ^?n  ∈ R. In this article, we introduce a new closely related class of integral domains. We define a prime ideal P of R to be a “pseudo-strongly prime ideal” if, whenever x, y ∈ K and xyP ? P, then there is a positive integer m ≥ 1 such that either x ^m  ∈ R or y ^m P ? P. If each prime ideal of R is a pseudo-strongly prime ideal, then R is called a “pseudo-almost valuation domain” (PAVD). We show that the class of valuation domains, the class of pseudo-valuation domains, the class of almost valuation domains, and the class of almost pseudo-valuation domains are properly contained in the class of pseudo-almost valuation domains; also we show that the class of pseudo-almost valuation domains is properly contained in the class of quasilocal domains with linearly ordered prime ideals. Among the properties of PAVDs, we show that an integral domain R is a PAVD if and only if for every nonzero x ∈ K, there is a positive integer n ≥ 1 such that either x ⁿ  ∈ R or ax ^?n  ∈ R for every nonunit a ∈ R. We show that pseudo-almost valuation domains are precisely the pullbacks of almost valuation domains, we characterize pseudo-almost valuation domains of the form D + M, and we use this characterization to construct PAVDs that are not almost valuation domains. We show that if R is a Noetherian PAVD, then R has Krull dimension at most one and R ^′ is a valuation domain; we show that every overring of a PAVD R is a PAVD iff R ^′ is a valuation domain and every integral overring of R is a PAVD.     

Vanishing Derivations and Co-Centralizing Generalized Derivations on Multilinear Polynomials in Prime Rings

Let R be a noncommutative prime ring of characteristic different from 2 with Utumi quotient ring U and extended centroid C, and f(x₁,…, x_n) be a multilinear polynomial over C, which is not central valued on R. Suppose that F and G are two generalized derivations of R and d is a nonzero derivation of R such that d(F(f(r))f(r) ? f(r)G(f(r))) = 0 for all r = (r₁,…, r_n) ∈ Rⁿ, then one of the following holds:

1. There exist a, p, q, c ∈ U and λ ∈C such that F(x) = ax + xp + λx, G(x) = px + xq and d(x) = [c, x] for all x ∈ R, with [c, a ? q] = 0 and f(x₁,…, x_n)² is central valued on R;

2. There exists a ∈ U such that F(x) = xa and G(x) = ax for all x ∈ R;

3. There exist a, b, c ∈ U and λ ∈C such that F(x) = λx + xa ? bx, G(x) = ax + xb and d(x) = [c, x] for all x ∈ R, with b + αc ∈ C for some α ∈C;

4. R satisfies s₄ and there exist a, b ∈ U and λ ∈C such that F(x) = λx + xa ? bx and G(x) = ax + xb for all x ∈ R;

5. There exist a′, b, c ∈ U and δ a derivation of R such that F(x) = a′x + xb ? δ(x), G(x) = bx + δ(x) and d(x) = [c, x] for all x ∈ R, with [c, a′] = 0 and f(x₁,…, x_n)² is central valued on R.

     

On Lie Automorphisms,Additive Subgroups,and Lie Ideals of Prime Rings

Abstract

Let R be a prime ring of characteristic not equal to 2 or 3 and let L be a noncentral Lie ideal of R. Suppose that σ is a Lie automorphism on L such that σ⁴ is not the identity map. Then the additive subgroup generated by the set {[x ^σ, x] ∣ x ∈ L} contains a noncentral Lie ideal of R.     

Quadratic Central Differential Identities on a Multilinear Polynomial

Let K be a commutative ring with unity, R a prime K-algebra, Z(R) the center of R, d and δ nonzero derivations of R, and f(x ₁,…, x _n ) a multilinear polynomial over K. If [d(f(r ₁,…, r _n )), δ (f(r ₁,…, r _n ))] ? Z(R), for all r ₁,…, r _n  ? R, then either f(x ₁,…, x _n ) is central valued on R or {d, δ} are linearly dependent over C, the extended centroid of R, except when char(R) = 2 and dim _C RC = 4.