t-Extending Modules and t-Baer Modules

We introduce the notions of “t-extending modules,” and “t-Baer modules,” which are generalizations of extending modules. The second notion is also a generalization of nonsingular Baer modules. We show that a homomorphic image (hence a direct summand) of a t-extending module and a direct summand of a t-Baer module inherits the property. It is shown that a module M is t-extending if and only if M is t-Baer and t-cononsingular. The rings for which every free right module is t-extending are called right Σ-t-extending. The class of right Σ-t-extending rings properly contains the class of right Σ-extending rings. Among other equivalent conditions for such rings, it is shown that a ring R is right Σ-t-extending, if and only if, every right R-module is t-extending, if and only if, every right R-module is t-Baer, if and only if, every nonsingular right R-module is projective. Moreover, it is proved that for a ring R, every free right R-module is t-Baer if and only if Z ₂(R _R ) is a direct summand of R and every submodule of a direct product of nonsingular projective R-modules is projective.     

MODULES WITH FULLY INVARIANT SUBMODULES ESSENTIAL IN FULLY INVARIANT SUMMANDS

ABSTRACT

A module M is called (strongly) FI-extending if every fully invariant submodule is essential in a (fully invariant) direct summand. The class of strongly FI-extending modules is properly contained in the class of FI-extending modules and includes all nonsingular FI-extending (hence nonsingular extending) modules and all semiprime FI-exten ding rings. In this paper we examine the behavior of the class of strongly FI-extending modules with respect to the preservation of this property in submodules, direct summands, direct sums, and endomorphism rings.     

On the inheritance of the strongly π-extending property

In this article, we focus on modules with the property that every projection invariant submodule is essential in a fully invariant direct summand. In contrast to π-extending condition, it is shown that the former property is inherited by direct summands and Morita invariant. An application of our results yields that the endomorphism ring of a free module enjoys the property. Moreover, we characterize generalized triangular matrix rings with the aforementioned property and apply to somewhat special cases.     

Semigroups with I-Quasi Length and Syntactic Semigroups

A module M is said to be extending (𝒢-extending) if for each submodule X of M there exists a direct summand D of M such that X is essential in D (X ∩ D is essential in both X and D). It is known that for a nonsingular module the concepts of 𝒢-extending and extending coincide. However, in the not nonsingular case, they are distinct. In this article, we obtain a characterization of the right 𝒢-extending generalized triangular matrix rings. This result and its corollaries improve and generalize the existing results on right extending generalized triangular matrix rings. It is well known that the ring of n-by-n triangular matrices over a right selfinjective ring is not, in general, right extending. One application of our characterization shows that such rings are right 𝒢-extending. Connections to Operator Theory and a characterization of the class of right extending right SI-rings are also obtained. Examples are given to illustrate and delimit the theory.     

关于基本可数生成子模的扩张性

称左R-模M是ecg-扩张模,如果M的任意基本可数生成子模是M的直和因子的基本子模.在研究了ecg-扩张模的基本性质的基础上,本文证明了对于非奇异环R,所有左R-模是ecg-扩张模当且仅当所有左R-模是扩张模.同时我们还用ecg-拟连续模刻画了Noether环和Artin半单环.     

Lifting Modules Over Right Perfect Rings

A module M is called extending if, for any submodule X of M, there exists a direct summand of M which contains X as an essential submodule, that is, for any submodule X of M, there exists a closure of X in M which is a direct summand of M. Dually, a module M is said to be lifting if, for any submodule X of M, there exists a direct summand of M which is a co-essential submodule of X, that is, for any submodule X of M, there exists a co-closure of X in M which is a direct summand of M.

Okado (1984 Okado , M. ( 1984 ). On the decomposition of extending modules . Math. Japonica 29 : 939 – 941 . [Google Scholar]) has studied the decomposition of extending modules over right noetherian rings. He obtained the following: A ring R is right noetherian if and only if every extending R-module can be expressed as a direct sum of indecomposable (uniform) modules.

In this article, we show that every (finitely generated) lifting module over a right perfect (semiperfect) ring can be expressed as a direct sum of indecomposable modules. And we consider some application of this result.     

On Cofinitely Lifting and Cofinitely Weak Lifting Modules

We say that a module M is lifting if M is amply supplemented and every supplement submodule of M is a direct summand. The module M is called cofinitely lifting if it is amply cofinitely supplemented and every supplement of any cofinite submodule of M is a direct summand. In this article various properties of cofinitely lifting modules are given. In addition, a generalization of cofinitely lifting modules is investigated.     

Extending modules relative to a torsion theory

An R-module M is said to be an extending module if every closed submodule of M is a direct summand. In this paper we introduce and investigate the concept of a type 2 τ-extending module, where τ is a hereditary torsion theory on Mod-R. An R-module M is called type 2 τ-extending if every type 2 τ-closed submodule of M is a direct summand of M. If τ _I is the torsion theory on Mod-R corresponding to an idempotent ideal I of R and M is a type 2 τ _I -extending R-module, then the question of whether or not M/MI is an extending R/I-module is investigated. In particular, for the Goldie torsion theory τ _G we give an example of a module that is type 2 τ _G -extending but not extending.     

Virtually semisimple modules and a generalization of the Wedderburn-Artin theorem

A widely used result of Wedderburn and Artin states that “every left ideal of a ring R is a direct summand of R if and only if R has a unique decomposition as a finite direct product of matrix rings over division rings.” Motivated by this, we call a module M virtually semisimple if every submodule of M is isomorphic to a direct summand of M and M is called completely virtually semisimple if every submodule of M is virtually semisimple. We show that the left R-module R is completely virtually semisimple if and only if R has a unique decomposition as a finite direct product of matrix rings over principal left ideal domains. This shows that R is completely virtually semisimple on both sides if and only if every finitely generated (left and right) R-module is a direct sum of a singular module and a projective virtually semisimple module. The Wedderburn-Artin theorem follows as a corollary from our result.     

Infinite Direct Sums of Lifting Modules

A module M over a ring R is called a lifting module if every submodule A of M contains a direct summand K of M such that A/K is a small submodule of M/K (e.g., local modules are lifting). It is known that a (finite) direct sum of lifting modules need not be lifting. We prove that R is right Noetherian and indecomposable injective right R-modules are hollow if and only if every injective right R-module is a direct sum of lifting modules. We also discuss the case when an infinite direct sum of finitely generated modules containing its radical as a small submodule is lifting.     

On Fully Idempotent Modules

A submodule N of a module M is idempotent if N = Hom(M, N)N. The module M is fully idempotent if every submodule of M is idempotent. We prove that over a commutative ring, cyclic idempotent submodules of any module are direct summands. Counterexamples are given to show that this result is not true in general. It is shown that over commutative Noetherian rings, the fully idempotent modules are precisely the semisimple modules. We also show that the commutative rings over which every module is fully idempotent are exactly the semisimple rings. Idempotent submodules of free modules are characterized.     

T-Semisimple Modules and T-Semisimple Rings

We define and investigate t-semisimple modules as a generalization of semisimple modules. A module M is called t-semisimple if every submodule N contains a direct summand K of M such that K is t-essential in N. T-semisimple modules are Morita invariant and they form a strict subclass of t-extending modules. Many equivalent conditions for a module M to be t-semisimple are found. Accordingly, M is t-semisiple, if and only if, M = Z ₂(M) ⊕ S(M) (where Z ₂(M) is the Goldie torsion submodule and S(M) is the sum of nonsingular simple submodules). A ring R is called right t-semisimple if R _R is t-semisimple. Various characterizations of right t-semisimple rings are given. For some types of rings, conditions equivalent to being t-semisimple are found, and this property is investigated in terms of chain conditions.     

Describing units of integral group rings of some 2-groups

Let R be a ring and M a right R-module. The module M is a CS-module or satifies (C₁) if every submodule is essential in a direct summand of M. In this note we investigate two generalizations of CS-modules.     

Rings Related to Mininjective and Min-Flat Modules

R is called a left PS (resp. left min-coherent, left universally mininjective) ring if every simple left ideal is projective (resp. finitely presented, a direct summand of R). We first investigate when the endomorphism ring of a module is a PS ring, a min-coherent ring, or a universally mininjective ring. Then we characterize PS rings and universally mininjective rings in terms of endomorphisms of mininjective and min-flat modules. Finally, we study commutative min-coherent rings and (universally) mininjective rings using properties of homomorphism modules of special modules.     

广义FP—内射模、广义平坦模与某些环

左（右）R－模A称为GFP－内射模，如果ExtR(M,A)=0对任－2－表现R－模M成立；左（右）R－模称为G－平坦的，如果Tor1^R(M,A)=0(Tor1^R(AM)=0)对于任一2－表现右（左）R－模M成立；环R称左（右）R－半遗传环，如果投射左（右）R－模的有限表现子模是投射的，环R称为左（右）G－正而环，如果自由左（右）R－模的有限表现子模为其直和项，研究了GFP－内射模和G－平坦模的一些性质，给出了它们的一些等价刻划，并利用它们刻划了凝聚环，G－半遗传环和G－正则环。     

Goldie Extending Modules

In this article, we define a module M to be 𝒢-extending if and only if for each X ≤ M there exists a direct summand D of M such that X ∩ D is essential in both X and D. We consider the decomposition theory for 𝒢-extending modules and give a characterization of the Abelian groups which are 𝒢-extending. In contrast to the charac-terization of extending Abelian groups, we obtain that all finitely generated Abelian groups are 𝒢-extending. We prove that a minimal cogenerator for 𝒢od-R is 𝒢-extending, but not, in general, extending. It is also shown that if M is (𝒢-) extending, then so is its rational hull. Examples are provided to illustrate and delimit the theory.     

When some complement of a z-closed submodule is a summand

In this article we study modules with the condition that every z-closed submodule has a complement which is a direct summand. This new class of modules properly contains the class of extending modules. It is well known that the class of extending modules is closed under direct summands, but not under direct sums. In contrast to extending (or CS) modules, it is shown that the class of modules with former property is closed under direct sums. However we provide number of algebraic topological examples which show that this new class of modules is not closed under direct summands. To this end we obtain several results on the inheritance of the latter closure property.     

Lifting Modules with Indecomposable Decompositions

A module M is called a “lifting module” if, any submodule A of M contains a direct summand B of M such that A/B is small in M/B. This is a generalization of projective modules over perfect rings as well as the dual of extending modules. It is well known that an extending module with ascending chain condition (a.c.c.) on the annihilators of its elements is a direct sum of indecomposable modules. If and when a lifting module has such a decomposition is not known in general. In this article, among other results, we prove that a lifting module M is a direct sum of indecomposable modules if (i) rad(M ^(I)) is small in M ^(I) for every index set I, or, (ii) M has a.c.c. on the annihilators of (certain) elements, and rad(M) is small in M.     

On strongly ⊕-supplemented modules

Strongly ⊕-supplemented and strongly cofinitely ⊕-supplemented modules are defined and some properties of strongly ⊕-supplemented and strongly cofinitely ⊕-supplemented modules are investigated. Let R be a ring. Then every R-module is strongly ⊕-supplemented if and only if R is perfect. The finite direct sum of ⊕-supplemented modules is ⊕-supplemented. However, this is not true for strongly ⊕-supplemented modules. Any direct sum of cofinitely ⊕-supplemented modules is cofinitely ⊕-supplemented but this is not true for strongly cofinitely ⊕-supplemented modules. We also prove that a supplemented module is strongly ⊕-supplemented if and only if every supplement submodule lies above a direct summand.