Some Results on p-Nilpotence and Supersolvability of Finite Groups

Let G be a finite group. A subgroup K of a group G is called an ?-subgroup of G if N _G (K) ∩ K ^x  ≦ K for all x ? G. The set of all ?-subgroups of G will be denoted by ?(G). Let P be a nontrivial p-group. A chain of subgroups 1 = P ₀ ? P ₁ ? ··· ? P _n  = P is called a maximal chain of P provided that |P _i : P _i?1| = p, i = 1, 2, ···, n. A nontrivial p-subgroup P of G is called weakly supersolvably embedded in G if P has a maximal chain 1 = P ₀ ? P ₁ ? ··· ? P _i  ? ··· ? P _n  = P such that P _i  ? ?(G) for i = 1, 2, ···, n. Using the concept of weakly supersolvably embedded, we obtain new characterizations of p-nilpotent and supersolvable finite groups.     

Commutativity Pattern of Finite Non-Abelian p-Groups Determine Their Orders

Let G be a non-abelian group and Z(G) be the center of G. Associate a graph Γ _G (called noncommuting graph of G) with G as follows: Take G?Z(G) as the vertices of Γ _G , and join two distinct vertices x and y, whenever xy ≠ yx. Here, we prove that “the commutativity pattern of a finite non-abelian p-group determine its order among the class of groups"; this means that if P is a finite non-abelian p-group such that Γ _P  ? Γ _H for some group H, then |P| = |H|.     

Dimensions of Formal Fibers of Height One Prime Ideals

Let T be a complete local (Noetherian) ring with maximal ideal M, P a nonmaximal ideal of T, and C = {Q ₁, Q ₂,…} a (nonempty) finite or countable set of nonmaximal prime ideals of T. Let {p ₁, p ₂,…} be a set of nonzero regular elements of T, whose cardinality is the same as that of C. Suppose that p _i  ∈ Q _j if and only if i = j. We give conditions that ensure there is an excellent local unique factorization domain A such that A is a subring of T, the maximal ideal of A is M ∩ A, the (M ∩ A)-adic completion of A is T, and so that the following three conditions hold: (1) p _i  ∈ A for every i; (2) A ∩ P = (0), and if J is a prime ideal of T with J ∩ A = (0), then J ? P or J ? Q _i for some i; (3) for each i, p _i A is a prime ideal of A, Q _i ∩ A = p _i A, and if J is a prime ideal of T with J ? Q _i , then J ∩ A ≠ p _i A.     

A New Characterization of A 10 by its Noncommuting Graph

Let G be a nonabelian group and associate a noncommuting graph ?(G) with G as follows: The vertex set of ?(G) is G\Z(G) with two vertices x and y joined by an edge whenever the commutator of x and y is not the identity. In 1987, Professor J. G. Thompson gave the following conjecture.

Thompson's Conjecture. If G is a finite group with Z(G) = 1 and M is a nonabelian simple group satisfying N(G) = N(M), then G ? M, where N(G):={n ∈ ? | G has a conjugacy class of size n}.

In 2006, A. Abdollahi, S. Akbari, and H. R. Maimani put forward a conjecture (AAM's conjecture) in Abdollahi et al. (2006) as follows.

AAM's Conjecture. Let M be a finite nonabelian simple group and G a group such that ?(G) ? ? (M). Then G ? M.

In this short article we prove that if G is a finite group with ?(G) ? ? (A ₁₀), then G ? A ₁₀, where A ₁₀ is the alternating group of degree 10.     

The Kernel of the Average Sylow Multiplicity Character and the Solvable Radical

Let G be a finite group, and let p ₁,…, p _m be the distinct prime divisors of |G|. Given a sequence 𝒫 =P ₁,…, P _m , where P _i is a Sylow p _i -subgroup of G, and g ∈ G, denote by m _𝒫(g) the number of factorizations g = g ₁…g _m such that g _i  ∈ P _i . Previously, it was shown that the properly normalized average of m _𝒫 over all 𝒫 is a complex character over G termed the Average Sylow Multiplicity Character. The present article identifies the kernel of this character as the subgroup of G consisting of all g ∈ G such that m _𝒫(gx) = m _𝒫(x) for all 𝒫 and all x ∈ G. This result implies a close connection between the kernel and the solvable radical of G.     

On Partial Tilting Complexes

Let R be a commutative noetherian ring and A a noetherian R-algebra. Let P ^? ∈ 𝒦^b(𝒫 _A ) with Hom_𝒦(Mod-A)(P ^?, P ^?[i]) = 0 for i > 0. We will provide a sufficient condition for P ^? to be a direct summand of a silting complex. Also, in case Hom_𝒦(Mod-A)(P ^?, P ^?[i]) = 0 for i ≠ 0, we will provide a sufficient condition for P ^? to be a direct summand of a tilting complex.     

The Leading Ideal of a Complete Intersection of Height Two,Part III

Let (S, 𝔫) be an s-dimensional regular local ring with s > 2, and let I = (f, g) be an ideal in S generated by a regular sequence f, g of length two. As in [2 Goto , S. , Heinzer , W. , Kim , M.-K. ( 2006 ). The leading ideal of a complete intersection of height two . J. Algebra 298 : 238 – 247 . [Google Scholar], 3 Goto , S. , Heinzer , W. , Kim , M.-K. ( 2007 ). The leading ideal of a complete intersection of height two, II . J. Algebra 312 : 709 – 732 . [Google Scholar]], we examine the leading form ideal I* of I in the associated graded ring G: = gr_𝔫(S). Let μ _G (I*) = n ≥ 3, and let {ξ₁, ξ₂,…, ξ _n } be a minimal homogeneous system of generators of I* such that ξ₁ = f* and ξ₂ = g*, and c _i : = deg ξ _i  ≤ deg ξ _i+1: = c _i+1 for each i ≤ n ? 1. For m ≤ n, we say that K _m : = (ξ₁,…, ξ _m )G is an ideal generated by part of a minimal homogeneous generating set of I*. Let D _i : = GCD(ξ₁,…, ξ _i ) and d _i  = deg D _i for i with 1 ≤ i ≤ m. Let K _m be perfect with ht _G K _m  = 2. We prove that the following are equivalent: 1. deg ξ _i+1 = deg ξ _i  + (d _i?1 ? d _i ) +1, for all i with 3 ≤ i ≤ m ? 1;

2. deg ξ _i+1 ≤ deg ξ _i  + (d _i?1 ? d _i ) +1, for all i with 3 ≤ i ≤ m ? 1.

Furthermore, if these equivalent conditions hold, then K _m  = I*. Moreover, if e(G/K _m ) = e(G/I*), we prove that K _m  = I*. We illustrate with several examples in the cases where K _m is or is not perfect.     

Finite Groups with Conjugacy Classes Number One Greater than Its Same Order Classes Number

ABSTRACT

Let k(G) be the number of conjugacy classes of finite groups G and π _e (G) be the set of the orders of elements in G. Then there exists a non-negative integer k such that k(G) = |π _e (G)| + k. We call such groups to be co(k) groups. This article classifies all finite co(1) groups. They are isomorphic to one of the following groups: A ₅, L ₂(7), S ₅, Z ₃, Z ₄, S ₄, A ₄, D ₁₀, Hol(Z ₅), or Z ₃ ? Z ₄.     

The Cohen–Macaulay and Gorenstein Properties of Rings Associated to Filtrations

Let (R, m) be a Cohen–Macaulay local ring, and let ? = {F _i } _i∈? be an F ₁-good filtration of ideals in R. If F ₁ is m-primary we obtain sufficient conditions in order that the associated graded ring G(?) be Cohen–Macaulay. In the case where R is Gorenstein, we use the Cohen–Macaulay result to establish necessary and sufficient conditions for G(?) to be Gorenstein. We apply this result to the integral closure filtration ? associated to a monomial parameter ideal of a polynomial ring to give necessary and sufficient conditions for G(?) to be Gorenstein. Let (R, m) be a Gorenstein local ring, and let F ₁ be an ideal with ht(F ₁) = g > 0. If there exists a reduction J of ? with μ(J) = g and reduction number u: = r _J (?), we prove that the extended Rees algebra R′(?) is quasi-Gorenstein with a-invariant b if and only if J ⁿ : F _u  = F _n+b?u+g?1 for every n ∈ ?. Furthermore, if G(?) is Cohen–Macaulay, then the maximal degree of a homogeneous minimal generator of the canonical module ω _G(?) is at most g and that of the canonical module ω _R′(?) is at most g ? 1; moreover, R′(?) is Gorenstein if and only if J ^u : F _u  = F _u . We illustrate with various examples cases where G(?) is or is not Gorenstein.     

Weak Cayley Table Groups II: Alternating Groups and Finite Coxeter Groups

A weak Cayley table isomorphism is a bijection φ: G → H of groups such that φ(xy) ～ φ(x)φ(y) for all x, y ∈ G. Here ～denotes conjugacy. When G = H the set of all weak Cayley table isomorphisms φ: G → G forms a group 𝒲(G) that contains the automorphism group Aut(G) and the inverse map I: G → G, x → x ^?1. Let 𝒲₀(G) = ?Aut(G), I? ≤ 𝒲(G) and say that G has trivial weak Cayley table group if 𝒲(G) = 𝒲₀(G). We show that all finite irreducible Coxeter groups (except possibly E ₈) have trivial weak Cayley table group, as well as most alternating groups. We also consider some sporadic simple groups.     

A New Construction for Cohen–Macaulay Graphs

Let G be a finite simple graph on a vertex set V(G) = {x ₁₁,…, x _n1}. Also let m ₁,…, m _n  ≥ 2 be integers and G ₁,…, G _n be connected simple graphs on the vertex sets V(G _i ) = {x _i1,…, x _{im i} }. In this article, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions on G ₁,…, G _n for which the graph obtained by attaching the G _i to G is unmixed or vertex decomposable. Then we characterize Cohen–Macaulay and sequentially Cohen–Macaulay graphs obtained by attaching the cycle graphs or connected chordal graphs to arbitrary graphs.     

Varieties of Algebras without the Amalgamation Property

Let α be an ordinal and κ be a cardinal, both infinite, such that κ ≤ |α|. For τ ∈^αα, let sup(τ) = {i ∈ α: τ(i) ≠ i}. Let G _κ = {τ ∈^αα: |sup(τ)| < κ}. We consider variants of polyadic equality algebras by taking cylindrifications on Γ ? α, |Γ| < κ and substitutions restricted to G _κ. Such algebras are also enriched with generalized diagonal elements. We show that for any variety V containing the class of representable algebas and satisfying a finite schema of equations, V fails to have the amalgamation property. In particular, many varieties of Halmos’ quasi-polyadic equality algebras and Lucas’ extended cylindric algebras (including that of the representable algebras) fail to have the amalgamation property.     

On Derived Equivalences for Selfinjective Algebras

We show that if A is a representation-finite selfinjective Artin algebra, then every P ^? ? K ^b(𝒫 _A ) with Hom _K(Mod?A)(P ^?,P ^?[i]) = 0 for i ≠ 0 and add(P ^?) = add(νP ^?) is a direct summand of a tilting complex, and that if A, B are derived equivalent representation-finite selfinjective Artin algebras, then there exists a sequence of selfinjective Artin algebras A = B ₀, B ₁,…, B _m  = B such that, for any 0 ≤ i < m, B _i+1 is the endomorphism algebra of a tilting complex for B _i of length ≤ 1.     

Ample Vector Bundles with Small g − q

Let X be a smooth complex projective variety and let Z ? X be a smooth submanifold of dimension ≥ 2, which is the zero locus of a section of an ample vector bundle ? of rank dim X ? dim Z ≥ 2 on X. Let H be an ample line bundle on X, whose restriction H _Z to Z is generated by global sections. The structure of triplets (X,?,H) as above is described under the assumption that the curve genus of the corank-1 vector bundle ? ⊕ H ^{⊕ (dim Z?1)} is ≤ h ¹( _X ) + 2.     

m-Power Commuting MAPS on Semiprime Rings

Let R be a semiprime ring with center Z(R), extended centroid C, U the maximal right ring of quotients of R, and m a positive integer. Let f: R → U be an additive m-power commuting map. Suppose that f is Z(R)-linear. It is proved that there exists an idempotent e ∈ C such that ef(x) = λx + μ(x) for all x ∈ R, where λ ∈C and μ: R → C. Moreover, (1 ? e)U ? M₂(E), where E is a complete Boolean ring. As consequences of the theorem, it is proved that every additive, 2-power commuting map or centralizing map from R to U is commuting.     

Non-Commuting Graphs of Nilpotent Groups

Let G be a non-abelian group and Z(G) be the center of G. The non-commuting graph Γ _G associated to G is the graph whose vertex set is G?Z(G) and two distinct elements x, y are adjacent if and only if xy ≠ yx. We prove that if G and H are non-abelian nilpotent groups with irregular isomorphic non-commuting graphs, then |G| = |H|.     

On a Question of Glasby,Praeger, and Xia

A Jordan partition λ(m, n, p) = (λ₁, λ₂, … , λ _m ) is a partition of mn associated with the expression of a tensor V _m  ? V _n of indecomposable KG-modules into a sum of indecomposables, where K is a field of characteristic p and G a cyclic group of p-power order. It is standard if λ _i  = m + n ? 2i + 1 for all i. We answer a recent question of Glasby, Praeger, and Xia who asked for necessary and sufficient conditions for λ(m, n, p) to be standard.     

On Generalizations of Prime Ideals (II)

Let R be a commutative ring with identity. We say that a proper ideal P of R is (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime (n ≥ 2) if 0 ≠ a ₁…a _n  ∈ P implies a ₁…a _i?1 a _i+1…a _n  ∈ P for some i ∈ {1,…, n}, where a ₁,…, a _n  ∈ R. In this article, we study (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime ideals. A number of results concerning (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime ideals and examples of (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime ideals are given. Rings with the property that for a positive integer n such that 2 ≤ n ≤ 5, every proper ideal is (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime are characterized. Moreover, it is shown that in some rings, nonzero (n ? 1, n)-weakly prime ideals and (n ? 1, n)-prime ideals coincide.     

Orthogonal factorizations of graphs

Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G) and edge set E(G). Let k₁, k₂,…,k_m be positive integers. It is proved in this study that every [0,k₁+…+k_m?m+1]‐graph G has a [0, k_i]₁^m‐factorization orthogonal to any given subgraph H with m edges. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 40: 267–276, 2002