2‐Aminopyridinium–succinate–succinic acid (2/1/1)

In the title compound, 2C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₄O₄^2?·C₄H₆O₄, cyclic eight‐membered hydrogen‐bonded rings exist involving 2‐amino­pyridinium and succinate ions. The succinic acid and succinate moieties lie on inversion centres. Succinic acid mol­ecules and succinate ions are linked into zigzag chains by O—H?O hydrogen bonds, with O?O distances of 2.6005 (16) Å.     

The acid adducts hydrazinium 2‐hydroxybenzoate–2‐hydroxybenzoic acid (1/1) and hydrazinium 3‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthoate–3‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthoic acid (1/1)

The title molecular salts, N₂H₅⁺·C₇H₅O₃⁻·C₇H₆O₃ and N₂H₅⁺·C₁₁H₇O₃⁻·C₁₁H₈O₃, are acid adducts containing a hydrazinium cation, one molecule of a deprotonated acid and one molecule of a neutral acid. The two compounds contain essentially identical hydrogen‐bond networks between the hydrazinium cation and the acid molecules, which define closely comparable two‐dimensional layers in the structures. The planes of the aromatic rings within both structures are approximately parallel and the layers are stacked with comparable intermolecular interactions.     

2‐Amino­pyridinium–fumarate–fumaric acid (2/1/1)

The title complex, 2C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₂O₄²⁻·C₄H₄O₄, contains cyclic eight‐membered hydrogen‐bonded rings involving 2‐­aminopyridinium and fumarate ions. The fumaric acid mol­ecules and fumarate ions lie on inversion centers and are linked into zigzag chains by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The dihedral angle between the pyridinium ring and the hydrogen‐bonded fumarate ion is 7.60 (4)°. The fumarate anion is linked to the pyridinium cations by intermolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The heterocycle is fully protonated, thus enabling amine–imine tautomerization.     

Comparison of the hydrogen‐bond patterns in 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1) and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1)

The X‐ray single‐crystal structure determinations of the chemically related compounds 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazolium hydrogen oxalate, C₂H₄N₃S⁺·C₂HO₄⁻, (I), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–succinic acid (1/2), C₂H₃N₃S·2C₄H₆O₄, (II), 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–glutaric acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₅H₈O₄, (III), and 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole–adipic acid (1/1), C₂H₃N₃S·C₆H₁₀O₄, (IV), are reported and their hydrogen‐bonding patterns are compared. The hydrogen bonds are of the types N—H...O or O—H...N and are of moderate strength. In some cases, weak C—H...O interactions are also present. Compound (II) differs from the others not only in the molar ratio of base and acid (1:2), but also in its hydrogen‐bonding pattern, which is based on chain motifs. In (I), (III) and (IV), the most prominent feature is the presence of an R₂²(8) graph‐set motif formed by N—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds, which are present in all structures except for (I), where only a pair of N—H...O hydrogen bonds is present, in agreement with the greater acidity of oxalic acid. There are nonbonding S...O interactions present in all four structures. The difference electron‐density maps show a lack of electron density about the S atom along the S...O vector. In all four structures, the carboxylic acid H atoms are present in a rare configuration with a C—C—O—H torsion angle of ∼0°. In the structures of (II)–(IV), the C—C—O—H torsion angle of the second carboxylic acid group has the more common value of ∼|180|°. The dicarboxylic acid molecules are situated on crystallographic inversion centres in (II). The Raman and IR spectra of the title compounds are presented and analysed.     

Hydrogen bonding in 1,2‐diazine–chloranilic acid (2/1) and 1,4‐diazine–chloranilic acid (2/1) determined at 110 K

The crystal structures of the isomeric title compounds [systematic names: pyridazine–2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐dihydroxy‐p‐benzoquinone (2/1), (I), and pyrazine–2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐dihydroxy‐p‐benzoquinone (2/1), (II)], 2C₄H₄N₂·C₆H₂Cl₂O₄, have been redetermined at 110 K. The H atom in the intermolecular O...H...N hydrogen bond in each compound was revealed to be disordered; the relative occupancies at the O and N sites are 0.33 (3) and 0.67 (3), respectively, for (I), and 0.56 (4) and 0.44 (4) for (II). The formal charges of the chloranilic acid in (I) and (II) estimated from the occupancy factors are ca−1.3 and −0.8, respectively. The geometries of the centrosymmetric chloranilic acid molecule in (I) and (II) are compared with the neutral, monoanionic and dianionic forms of chloranilic acid optimized by density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6–311+G(3df,2p) level. The result implies that the chloranilic acid molecule in (I) is close to the monoanionic state, while that in (II) is between neutral and monoanionic, consistent with the result derived from the H‐atom occupancies.     

Tris[(1‐methylimidazol‐2‐yl)methyl]amine–boric acid (1/1)

Cocrystallization of a poly­imidazole compound with boric acid results in the formation of the title compound, C₁₅H₂₁N₇·B(OH)₃, which has an extensive hydrogen‐bonding network. The O?N(im) separations (im is imidazole) range from 2.6991 (15) to 2.7914 (14) Å, with O—H?N angles ranging from 170.6 (18) to 175 (2)°. In addition, symmetry‐related boric acid mol­ecules form intermolecular hydrogen bonds, with an O?O distance of 2.7582 (14) Å, and symmetry‐related imidazole groups form π–π stacks, with a centroid‐to‐centroid separation of 3.533 Å.     

Piperazine‐1,4‐diium–2,4‐dinitrophenolate–water (1/2/2)

In the title 1/2/2 adduct, C₄H₁₂N₂²⁺·2C₆H₃N₂O₅^?·2H₂O, the dication lies on a crystallographic inversion centre and the asymmetric unit also has one anion and one water mol­ecule in general positions. The 2,4‐di­nitro­phenolate anions and the water mol­ecules are linked by two O—H?O and two C—H?O hydrogen bonds to form molecular ribbons, which extend along the b direction. The piperazine dication acts as a donor for bifurcated N—H?O hydrogen bonds with the phenolate O atom and with the O atom of the o‐nitro group. Six symmetry‐related molecular ribbons are linked to a piperazine dication by N—H?O and C—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

Triphenylphosphine oxide–3‐chlorobenzoic acid (1/1)

In the title compound, C₁₈H₁₅OP·C₇H₅ClO₂, the tri­phenyl­phosphine oxide molecule forms a single directed hydrogen bond with the 3‐chloro­benzoic acid molecule, with an O⃛O=P distance of 2.607 (2) Å. The C—Cl and C=O bonds adopt a cisoid conformation in the 3‐chloro­benzoic acid molecule.     

Synthesis and characterization of (cryptand‐222)potassium (2‐methylimidazolato)(meso‐tetraphenylporphinato)ferrate(II)–2‐methylimidazole–tetrahydrofuran (1/1/2)

Metalloporphyrin complexes containing an additional imidazole ligand can provide information about the effect of deprotonation or hydrogen bonding on the axial histidine unit in heme proteins. The title high‐spin five‐coordinate imidazolate‐ligated iron(II) porphyrinate, [K(C₁₈H₃₆N₂O₆)][Fe(C₄H₅N₂)(C₄₄H₂₈N₄)]·C₄H₆N₂·2C₄H₈O, has been synthesized and investigated. The solvated salt crystallizes with one 2‐methylimidazole molecule, two tetrahydrofuran solvent molecules and a potassium cation chelated inside a cryptand‐222 (4,7,13,16,21,24‐hexaoxa‐1,10‐diazabicyclo[8.8.8]hexacosane) molecule. The imidazolate ligand is ordered. The average Fe—Np (Np is a porphyrin N atom) bond length is 2.113 (11) Å and the axial Fe—N_Im (N_Im is an imidazolate N atom) is 2.0739 (13) Å. The out‐of‐plane displacement of the Fe^II atom from the 24‐atom mean plane is 0.6098 (5) Å, indicating an apparent doming of the porphyrin core.     

Benzene‐1,4‐diboronic acid–4,4′‐bipyridine–water (1/2/2)

In the presence of water, benzene‐1,4‐diboronic acid (1,4‐bdba) and 4,4′‐bipyridine (4,4′‐bpy) form a cocrystal of composition (1,4‐bdba)(4,4′‐bpy)₂(H₂O)₂, in which the molecular components are organized in two, so far unknown, cyclophane‐type hydrogen‐bonding patterns. The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C₆H₈B₂O₄·2C₁₀H₈N₂·2H₂O, contains two 4,4′‐bpy, two water molecules and two halves of 1,4‐bdba molecules arranged around crystallographic inversion centers. The occurrence of O—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds involving the water molecules and all O atoms of boronic acid gives rise to a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded layer structure that develops parallel to the (01) plane. This supramolecular organization is reinforced by π–π interactions between symmetry‐related 4,4′‐bpy molecules.     

The ternary complex 4‐(2‐pyridyl)pyridinium–3,5‐di­nitro­benzoate–3,5‐di­nitro­benzoic acid (1/1/1)

In the title ternary complex, C₁₀H₉N₂⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₆^?·C₇H₄N₂O₆, the pyridinium cation adopts the role of the donor in an intermolecular N—H?O hydrogen‐bonding interaction with the carboxyl­ate group of the 3,5‐di­nitro­benzoate anion. The mol­ecules of the ternary complex form molecular ribbons perpendicular to the b direction, which are stabilized by one N—H?O, one O—H?O and five C—H?O intermolecular hydrogen bonds. The ribbons are further interconnected by three intermolecular C—H?O hydrogen bonds into a three‐dimensional network.     

Magnesium iodide–4,4′‐bipyridine–water (1/3/4) and strontium iodide–4,4′‐bipyridine–propan‐1‐ol (1/2.5/2)

Both of the title compounds, catena‐poly­[[[tetra­aqua­magnesium(I)]‐μ‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐κ²N:N′] diiodide bis(4,4′‐bi­pyridine) solvate], {[Mg(C₁₀H₈N₂)(H₂O)₄]I₂·2C₁₀H₈N₂}_n, (I), and catena‐poly­[[[μ‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐bis­[di­iodo­bis­(propan‐1‐ol)­strontium(I)]]‐di‐μ‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐κ⁴N:N′] bis(4,4′‐bi­pyri­dine) solvate], {[Sr₂I₄(C₁₀H₈N₂)₃(C₃H₈O)₄]·2C₁₀H₈N₂}_n, (II), are one‐dimensional polymers which are single‐ and double‐stranded, respectively, the metal atoms being linked by the 4,4′‐bi­pyridine moieties. The Mg complex, (I), is [cis‐{(H₂O)₄Mg(N‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐N′)_(2/2)}]_(∞|∞)I₂·4,4′‐bi­pyridine and Mg has a six‐coordinate quasi‐octahedral coordination environment. The Sr complex, (II), is isomorphous with its previously defined Ba counterpart [Kepert, Waters & White (1996). Aust. J. Chem. 49 , 117–135], being [(propan‐1‐ol)₂I₂Sr(N‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine‐N′)_(3/2)]_(∞|∞)·4,4′‐bi­pyridine, with the I atoms trans‐axial in a seven‐coordinate pentagonal–bipyramidal Sr environment.     

4‐Pyridone–terephthalic acid–water (2/1/2) and bis(3‐hydroxypyridinium) terephthalate

4‐Hydroxypyridine and terephthalic acid cocrystallize as a hydrate, 4‐pyridone–terephthalic acid–water (2/1/2), 2C₅H₅NO·C₈H₆O₄·2H₂O, from a methanol–water solution. The molecules form a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network resulting in sheets of hydrogen‐bonded molecules that lie parallel to the (10) plane. In contrast, 3‐hydroxypyridine and terephthalic acid form the salt bis(3‐hydroxypyridinium) terephthalate, 2C₅H₆NO⁺·C₈H₄O₄²⁻, giving rise to two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheets extending through the lattice parallel to the (10) plane.     

Tri­phenyl­phosphine oxide–1‐naphthoic acid (1/1)

In the title compound, C₁₈H₁₅OP·C₁₁H₈O₂, co‐crystallization of tri­phenyl­phosphine oxide with 1‐naphthoic acid yields a supramolecular structure held together by one O—H⋯O and three C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The O—H⋯O hydrogen bond [O⋯O = 2.592 (2) Å] has little effect on the O=P bond distance.     

(2S)‐1‐Carbamoylpyrrolidine‐2‐carboxylic acid

In the title compound, also known as N‐carbamoyl‐l ‐proline, C₆H₁₀N₂O₃, the pyrrolidine ring adopts a half‐chair conformation, whereas the carboxyl group and the mean plane of the ureide group form an angle of 80.1 (2)°. Molecules are joined by N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds into cyclic structures with graph‐set R²₂(8), forming chains in the b‐axis direction that are further connected via N—H...O hydrogen bonds into a three‐dimensional network.     

4,4′‐Bipyridyl N,N′‐dioxide–3‐hydroxy‐2‐naphthoic acid (1/2)

4,4′‐Bipyridyl N,N′‐dioxide crystallizes with 3‐hydr­oxy‐2‐naphthoic acid to give a centrosymmetric three‐component adduct, C₁₀H₈N₂O₂·2C₁₁H₈O₃, which is engineered into a two‐dimensional layer structure by two kinds of π–π inter­actions. Weak C—H⋯O inter­actions further link the two‐dimensional structure into a three‐dimensional structure.     

Reversible phase transition of 2‐carboxypyridinium perchlorate–pyridinium‐2‐carboxylate (1/1)

The title salt, C₆H₆NO₂⁺·ClO₄⁻·C₆H₅NO₂, was crystallized from an aqueous solution of equimolar quantities of perchloric acid and pyridine‐2‐carboxylic acid. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements show that the compound undergoes a reversible phase transition at about 261.7 K, with a wide heat hysteresis of 21.9 K. The lower‐temperature polymorph (denoted LT; T = 223 K) crystallizes in the space group C2/c, while the higher‐temperature polymorph (denoted RT; T = 296 K) crystallizes in the space group P2/c. The relationship between these two phases can be described as: 2a_RT = a_LT; 2b_RT = b_LT; c_RT = c_LT. The crystal structure contains an infinite zigzag hydrogen‐bonded chain network of 2‐carboxypyridinium cations. The most distinct difference between the higher (RT) and lower (LT) temperature phases is the change in dihedral angle between the planes of the carboxylic acid group and the pyridinium ring, which leads to the formation of different ten‐membered hydrogen‐bonded rings. In the RT phase, both the perchlorate anions and the hydrogen‐bonded H atom within the carboxylic acid group are disordered. The disordered H atom is located on a twofold rotation axis. In the LT phase, the asymmetric unit is composed of two 2‐carboxypyridinium cations, half an ordered perchlorate anion with ideal tetrahedral geometry and a disordered perchlorate anion. The phase transition is attributable to the order–disorder transition of half of the perchlorate anions.     

Hydrogen‐bonded networks in 5‐chloropyridin‐2‐amine–fumaric acid (2/1) and 2‐aminopyridinium dl‐malate

Crystals of 5‐chloropyridin‐2‐amine–(2E)‐but‐2‐enedioate (2/1), 2C₅H₅ClN₂·C₄H₄O₄, (I), and 2‐aminopyridinium dl ‐3‐carboxy‐2‐hydroxypropanoate, C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₅O₅⁻, (II), are built from the neutral 5‐chloropyridin‐2‐amine molecule and fumaric acid in the case of (I) and from ring‐N‐protonated 2‐aminopyridinium cations and malate anions in (II). The fumaric acid molecule lies on an inversion centre. In (I), the neutral 5‐chloropyridin‐2‐amine and fumaric acid molecules interact via hydrogen bonds, forming two‐dimensional layers parallel to the (100) plane, whereas in (II), oppositely charged units interact via ionic and hydrogen bonds, forming a three‐dimensional network.     

Aqua­bis(3‐meth­oxy‐2‐pyridonato)­(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine)ruthenium(II)–acetonitrile–water (1/1/1)

The title compound, [Ru(C₆H₆NO₂)₂(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)(H₂O)]·CH₃CN·H₂O, is a transfer hydrogenation catalyst supported by nitro­gen‐donor ligands. This octa­hedral Ru^II complex features rare monodentate coordination of 3‐meth­oxy‐2‐pyridonate ligands and inter­ligand S(6)S(6) hydrogen bonding. Comparison of the title complex with a structural analog with unsubstituted 2‐pyridonate ligands reveals subtle differences in the orientation of the ligand planes.