16‐Cyano‐13α‐(5‐methyl‐1,3,4‐oxa­diazol‐2‐yl)‐13,16‐seco‐17‐nor­androst‐5‐en‐3β‐yl acetate

In the title compound, C₂₃H₃₁N₃O₃, the outer cyclo­hexane rings have chair conformations, while the central cyclohexene ring adopts a half‐chair conformation. In the solid state, intra‐ and intermolecular C—H⋯N interactions are observed.     

3β‐(1‐Allyl‐1‐pyrrolidinio)‐16‐(2‐pyridylmethylene)androst‐5‐en‐17β‐ol bromide hemihydrate

The title compound, C₃₂H₄₅N₂O⁺·Br^?·0.5H₂O, has the outer two six‐membered rings in chair conformations, while the central ring is in an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation. The five‐mem­bered ring of the steroid nucleus adopts a slightly deformed 14α‐envelope conformation. The pyridyl­methyl­ene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the hydroxyl group at position 17. The structure is stabilized by a network of O—H?Br‐type intermolecular hydrogen bonds.     

16‐[3‐Methoxy‐4‐(2‐piperidin‐1‐yl­ethoxy)­benzyl­idene]‐17‐oxoandrost‐5‐en‐3β‐yl acetate monohydrate

The title compound, C₃₆H₄₉NO₅·H₂O, has the outer two six‐membered rings of the steroid nucleus in chair conformations. The central ring B of the steroid nucleus is in an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation, while ring D of the steroid adopts a slightly distorted 13β,14α‐half‐chair conformation. The piperidine ring is in a chair conformation. The methoxy­benzyl­idene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the carbonyl group at position 17. Intermolecular O—H?O and O—H?N hydrogen bonds link the steroid and water mol­ecules into chains which run parallel to the b axis.     

Methyl β‐allolactoside [methyl β‐d‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→6)‐β‐d‐glucopyranoside] monohydrate

Methyl β‐allolactoside [methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→6)‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside], (II), was crystallized from water as a monohydrate, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₁·H₂O. The βGalp and βGlcp residues in (II) assume distorted ⁴C₁ chair conformations, with the former more distorted than the latter. Linkage conformation is characterized by ϕ′ (C2_Gal—C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C6_Glc), ψ′ (C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C6_Glc—C5_Glc) and ω (C4_Glc—C5_Glc—C6_Glc—O1_Gal) torsion angles of 172.9 (2), −117.9 (3) and −176.2 (2)°, respectively. The ψ′ and ω values differ significantly from those found in the crystal structure of β‐gentiobiose, (III) [Rohrer et al. (1980). Acta Cryst. B 36 , 650–654]. Structural comparisons of (II) with related disaccharides bound to a mutant β‐galactosidase reveal significant differences in hydroxymethyl conformation and in the degree of ring distortion of the βGlcp residue. Structural comparisons of (II) with a DFT‐optimized structure, (II_C), suggest a link between hydrogen bonding, pyranosyl ring deformation and linkage conformation.     

16‐(4‐Cyanobenzylidene)‐3β‐pyrrolidinoandrost‐5‐en‐17β‐ol monohydrate

In the title compound, C₃₁H₄₀N₂O·H₂O, the outer two six‐membered rings are in chair conformations, while the central ring is in an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation. The five‐membered ring adopts a 13β‐envelope conformation and the cyano­benzyl­idene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the hydroxyl group at position 17. The steroid nuclei are linked by intermolecular O—H?O and O—H?N hydrogen bonds to form a molecular network. The molecular packing has an interesting feature, with the steroids aligned parallel to the b axis, forming a closed loop through hydrogen bonds linked via water mol­ecules.     

24(R)‐Acetyl­oxy‐1α,2α‐epoxy­cholesta‐4,6‐dien‐3‐one hydrate

In the title compound, C₂₉H₄₂O₄·H₂O, cyclo­hexane rings A and B are in the sofa conformation, ring C is in a chair conformation and the five‐membered ring D is in an envelope conformation. The structure is stabilized by inter‐ and intramolecular C—H?O and O—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

N‐{4‐Bromo‐2‐[(3‐bromo‐1‐phenylsulfonyl‐1H‐indol‐2‐yl)methyl]‐5‐methoxyphenyl}acetamide

In the title compound, C₂₄H₂₀Br₂N₂O₄S, the indole ring system is planar and the S atom has a distorted tetrahedral configuration. The sulfonyl‐bound phenyl ring is orthogonal to the indole ring system and the conformation of the phenyl­sulfonyl substituent with respect to the indole moiety is influenced by intramolecular C—H⃛O hydrogen bonds involving the two sulfonyl O atoms. The mean plane through the acetyl­amido group makes a dihedral angle of 57.0 (1)° with the phenyl ring of the benzyl moiety. In the crystal, glide‐related mol­ecules are linked together by N—H⃛O hydrogen bonds and C—H⃛π interactions to form molecular chains, which extend through the crystal. Inversion‐related chains are interlinked by C—H⃛π interactions to form molecular layers parallel to the bc plane. These layers are interconnected through π–π interactions involving the five‐ and six‐membered rings of the indole moiety.     

16α,17α‐Epoxy‐20‐oxopregn‐5‐en‐3β‐yl acetate

The title compound, C₂₃H₃₂O₄, has a 3β configuration, with the epoxy O atom at 16α,17α. Rings A and C have slightly distorted chair conformations. Because of the presence of the C5=C6 double bond, ring B assumes an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation slightly distorted towards an 8β‐sofa. Ring D has a conformation close to a 14α‐envelope. The acetoxy and acetyl substituents are twisted with respect to the average molecular plane of the steroid. The conformation of the mol­ecule is compared with that given by a quantum chemistry calculation using the RHF–AM1 (RHF = Roothaan Hartree–Fock) Hamiltonian model. Cohesion of the crystal can be attributed to van der Waals interactions and weak intermolecular C—H?O interactions, which link the mol­ecules head‐to‐tail along [101].     

4‐[1‐(Phenylsulfonyl)indol‐3‐yl]‐3a,4,5,9b‐tetrahydro‐3H‐cyclopenta[c]quinoline

In the title compound, C₂₆H₂₂N₂O₂S, the tetra­hydro­pyridine ring has a conformation intermediate between half‐chair and sofa. The tetrahydroquinoline mean plane makes a dihedral angle of 73.3 (1)° with the cyclopentene ring, which adopts an envelope conformation, and an angle of 45.45 (4)° with the indole best plane. The dihedral angle between the benzene and pyrrole rings is 2.6 (1)°. The orientations of the phenyl ring on the sulfonyl group and of the indole are governed by weak C—H?O interactions. The packing of the mol­ecule in the solid state is stabilized by C—H?O and C—H?N hydrogen bonds.     

Powder X‐ray study of racemic (2RS,3RS)‐5‐amino‐3‐(4‐phenylpiperazin‐1‐yl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydronaphthalen‐2‐ol

The title compound, C₂₀H₂₅N₃O, an important precursor for the preparation of benzovesamicol analogues for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, has been synthesized and characterized by FT–IR, and ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopic analyses. The crystal structure was analysed using powder diffraction as no suitable single crystal was obtained. The piperazine ring has a chair conformation, while the cyclohexene ring assumes a half‐chair conformation. The crystal packing is mediated by weak contacts, principally by complementary intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds that connect successive molecules into a chain. Further stabilization is provided by weak C—H...N contacts and by a weak intermolecular C—H...π interaction.     

6β‐Hydroxy‐5β‐methyl‐20‐oxo‐19‐norpregn‐9(10)‐en‐3β‐yl acetate

In the title compound, C₂₃H₃₄O₄, which is an intermediate in the synthesis of pregnane derivatives with a modified skeleton that show potent abortion‐inducing activity, the conformation of ring B is close to half‐chair due to the presence of both the C=C double bond and the axial 5β‐methyl group. Rings A and C have conformations close to chair, while ring D has a twisted conformation around the bridgehead C—C bond. Molecules are hydrogen bonded via the hydroxyl and acetoxy groups into infinite chains. Quantum‐mechanical ab initio Roothan Hartree–Fock calculations show that crystal packing might be responsible for the low values of the angles between rings A and B, and between ring A and rings C and D, as well as for a different steric position of the methyl ketone side chain compared to the geometry of the free molecule.     

Exo conformers of N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐ and N‐(pyridin‐3‐yl)norbornene‐5,6‐dicarboximide crystals

Two isomeric pyridine‐substituted norbornenedicarboximide derivatives, namely N‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐exo‐norbornene‐5,6‐dicarboximide, (I), and N‐(pyridin‐3‐yl)‐exo‐norbornene‐5,6‐dicarboximide, (II), both C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₄, have been crystallized and their structures unequivocally determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The molecules consist of norbornene moieties fused to a dicarboximide ring substituted at the N atom by either pyridin‐2‐yl or pyridin‐3‐yl in an anti configuration with respect to the double bond, thus affording exo isomers. In both compounds, the asymmetric unit consists of two independent molecules (Z′ = 2). In compound (I), the pyridine rings of the two independent molecules adopt different conformations, i.e. syn and anti, with respect to the methylene bridge. The intermolecular contacts of (I) are dominated by C—H...O interactions. In contrast, in compound (II), the pyridine rings of both molecules have an anti conformation and the two independent molecules are linked by carbonyl–carbonyl interactions, as well as by C—H...O and C—H...N contacts.     

17‐Oxo‐5α‐androst‐6‐en‐3β‐yl acetate

In the title compound, C₂₁H₃₀O₃, a potential inhibitor of aromatase, all rings are fused trans. Rings A and C have chair conformations which are slightly flattened, whereas the conformation of ring B is close to a half‐chair. Ring D has a 14α‐envelope conformation. The steroid nucleus has a small twist, as shown by the C19—C10⋯C13—C18 (steroid numbering) torsion angle of −6.9 (3)°. Ab initio calculations of the equilibrium geometry of the mol­ecule reproduce this small twist, which appears to be due to the conformation of ring B rather than to packing effects.     

Hydrogen‐bonding and C—H⋯π interactions in 7‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxy‐4‐methyl‐5,6,7,8‐tetrahydro­pyrido­[1,2‐c]pyrimidin‐1(9H)‐one

In the title compound, C₁₀H₁₄N₂O₃, a pyrimidine ring is fused with a piperidine ring. The pyrimidine ring is planar, whereas the piperidine ring adopts a half‐chair conformation. The molecules of the title compound are connected via O—H⋯O intermolecular hydrogen bonds into infinite zigzag chains. The pyrimidine ring is involved in three C—H⋯π interactions, which link the hydrogen‐bonded chains into a three‐dimensional framework.     

(3R,4S)‐3‐Phenyl‐1‐[(R)‐1‐phenyl­ethyl]‐4‐[(R)‐1‐phenylethyliminomethyl]azetidin‐2‐one

The configuration of the chiral ring atoms of the title compound, C₂₆H₂₆N₂O, obtained in an enantioselective synthesis, has been established relative to the known R configuration of the α‐methyl­benzyl moieties. The crystal packing involves a two‐dimensional network of C—H?π interactions between the aromatic rings.     

17‐Oxo‐16‐(2‐pyridyl­methyl­ene)­androst‐5‐en‐3β‐ol monohydrate

The title compound, C₂₅H₃₁NO₂·H₂O, has the outer two six‐membered rings in chair conformations, while the central ring is in an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation. The five‐membered ring adopts a 13,14‐half‐chair conformation. The pyridyl­methyl­ene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the carbonyl group at position 17. The structure is stabilized by intermolecular O—H?N and O—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

20‐Hydroxy­imino‐5α‐pregna‐9(11),16‐dien‐3β‐yl acetate and 17‐oxo‐5α‐androst‐9(11)‐en‐3β‐yl acetate

In the title compounds, C₂₃H₃₃NO₃ and C₂₁H₃₀O₃, respectively, the ester linkage in ring A is equatorial. In these steroids, the six‐membered rings A and B have chair conformations, but ring C can be better described as a half‐chair. The five‐membered ring D adopts a 14α‐envelop conformation. The A/B, B/C and C/D ring junctions are trans.     

cis‐[(4R,5R)‐4,5‐Bis­(amino­methyl)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐dioxolane‐N,N′](malonato‐O,O′)­platinum(II), an anticancer agent

In the title compound, [Pt(C₃H₂O₄)(C₇H₁₆N₂O₂)], the Pt atom is coordinated to two O and two N atoms in a square‐planar arrangement. The two independent mol­ecules, which have very similar structures, are approximately related by pseudo‐twofold screw‐axis symmetry. The six‐membered chelate ring in the leaving ligand assumes a conformation intermediate between the half‐chair and boat forms. The seven‐membered ring in the carrier ligand assumes a twist‐chair conformation and the oxolane ring assumes an envelope conformation. The crystal packing consists of extensive hydrogen‐bonding networks which form two‐dimensional molecular layers, and there are weak van der Waals interactions between these layers.     

3‐Deoxy‐β‐d‐ribo‐hexopyranose (3‐deoxy‐β‐d‐glucopyranose)

The β‐pyranose form, (III), of 3‐deoxy‐d ‐ribo‐hexose (3‐deoxy‐d ‐glucose), C₆H₁₂O₅, crystallizes from water at 298 K in a slightly distorted ⁴C₁ chair conformation. Structural analyses of (III), β‐d ‐glucopyranose, (IV), and 2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐arabino‐hexopyranose (2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐glucopyranose), (V), show significantly different C—O bond torsions involving the anomeric carbon, with the H—C—O—H torsion angle approaching an eclipsed conformation in (III) (−10.9°) compared with 32.8 and 32.5° in (IV) and (V), respectively. Ring carbon deoxygenation significantly affects the endo‐ and exocyclic C—C and C—O bond lengths throughout the pyranose ring, with longer bonds generally observed in the monodeoxygenated species (III) and (V) compared with (IV). These structural changes are attributed to differences in exocyclic C—O bond conformations and/or hydrogen‐bonding patterns superimposed on the direct (intrinsic) effect of monodeoxygenation. The exocyclic hydroxymethyl conformation in (III) (gt) differs from that observed in (IV) and (V) (gg).     

Powder X‐ray study of racemic (2RS,3RS)‐5‐amino‐3‐[4‐(3‐methoxyphenyl)piperazin‐1‐yl]‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydronaphthalen‐2‐ol

The structure of the title benzovesamicol analogue, C₂₁H₂₇N₃O₂, an important compound for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, has been determined by X‐ray powder diffraction. The title compound was firstly synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic methods (FT–IR, and ¹³C and ¹H NMR). The compound is a racemic mixture of enantiomers which crystallizes in the monoclinic system in a centrosymmetric space group (P2₁/c). Crystallography, in particular powder X‐ray diffraction, was pivotal in revealing that the enantio‐resolution did not succeed. The piperazine ring is in a chair conformation, while the cyclohexene ring assumes a half‐chair conformation. The crystal packing is dominated by intermolecular O—H...N hydrogen bonding which links molecules along the c direction.