X‐ray investigations of bicyclic α‐methyl­ene‐δ‐valerolactones. III. trans‐(4aR,8aR)‐4a‐Methoxy‐3‐methyleneperhydro­chromen‐2‐one

The title compound, C₁₁H₁₆O₃, adopts a conformation in which the δ‐valerolactone and cyclo­hexane rings are almost coplanar with one another. The β‐methoxy substituent occupies an axial position with respect to the cyclo­hexane ring. The δ‐valerolactone moiety adopts a half‐chair arrangement, while the cyclo­hexane ring exists in a chair conformation.     

X‐ray investigations of bicyclic α‐methyl­ene‐δ‐valerolactones. II. (4aS,8aS)‐4a‐Methyl‐3‐methyl­eneper­hydro­chromen‐2‐one

The title compound, C₁₁H₁₆O₂, adopts a semifolded conformation with the δ‐lactone and cyclo­hexane rings almost perpendicular to one another. The β‐methyl substituent occupies an axial position with respect to the cyclo­hexane ring. The δ‐lactone moiety adopts a slightly distorted half‐chair arrangement, while the cyclo­hexane ring exists in an almost ideal chair conformation.     

(4R,4aR,6S,7S,7aS)‐6‐Hydro­xy‐7‐hy­droxy­methyl‐4‐methyl­per­hydro­cyclo­penta­[c]­pyran‐1‐one chloro­form solvate from Valeriana laxiflora

The structure of an iridolactone isolated from Valeriana laxiflora was established as (4R,4aR,6S,7S,7aS)‐6‐hydroxy‐7‐hydroxy­methyl‐4‐methyl­per­hydro­cyclo­penta­[c]­pyran‐1‐one chloro­form solvate, C₁₀H₁₆O₄·CHCl₃. The two rings are cis‐fused. The δ‐lactone ring adopts a slightly twisted half‐chair conformation with approximate planarity of the lactone group and the cyclo­pentane ring adopts an envelope conformation. The hydroxy group, the hydroxymethyl group and the methyl group all have β orientations. The absolute configuration was determined using anomalous dispersion data enhanced by the adventitious inclusion of a chloro­form solvent mol­ecule. Hydro­gen bonding, crystal packing and ring conformations are discussed in detail.     

Conformational Analysis of δ‐Lactones by DFT Calculations: The Parent Compound and its Monomethyl and Selected Dimethyl Derivatives

The static and dynamic stereochemistry of unsubstituted δ‐valerolactone, all monomethylated δ‐lactones, and all nongeminally dimethylated δ‐lactones was explored with the B3LYP functional and def2‐TZVPP basis set. A search strategy was employed which allowed the entire conformational space of any (poly‐)substituted δ‐lactone to be scanned. It allowed the lowest threshold conformational interconversion pathways to be mapped. The latter can be visualized in appealingly intuitive yet unprecedented diagrams. They trace the energy versus a circular abscissa which describes the passage of the molecule through one complete conformation interchange. The respective plot is C₂‐symmetrical for the parent compound, which is achiral, and C₁‐symmetrical for all methylated δ‐lactones, which are chiral.     

Functional polyesters prepared by polymerization of α‐allyl(valerolactone) and its copolymerization with ε‐caprolactone and δ‐valerolactone

We report the ring‐opening homopolymerization of α‐allyl(valerolactone), compound 2 , and its copolymerization with ε‐caprolactone and δ‐valerolactone using stannous(II) catalysis. Although the polymerization of substituted δ‐valerolactones has received little attention for the preparation of functional polyesters, we found that compound 2 may be incorporated in controllable amounts into copolymers with other lactones, or simply homopolymerized to give a highly functionalized, novel poly(valerolactone). The presence of the pendant allyl substituent had a substantial impact on the thermal properties of these materials relative to conventional polyesters prepared from lactones, and most of the polymers presented here are liquids at room temperature. Dihydroxylation of the pendant allyl groups gave polyesters with increased hydrophilicity that degraded more or less rapidly depending on their extent of functionality. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 1983–1990, 2002     

Self‐assembling amphiphilic block copolymer from renewable δ‐decalactone and δ‐dodecalactone

Aliphatic polyesters have many applications in the biomedical field due to their properties and facile degradation. They are commonly synthesized via ring opening polymerization (ROP) with metal‐based catalysts, but as high temperatures are needed and the products contain metal, organocatalysts are now widely adopted to polymerize them at room temperature while also ensuring short reaction times. Here, 1,7,7‐triazabicyclo[4.4.0]‐dec‐5‐ene is used to polymerize less reactive but renewably‐derived lactones, namely δ‐decalactone and δ‐dodecalactone. These monomers were chosen in the attempt of creating renewable and highly lipophilic materials for drug delivery applications as alternatives to the more traditional, but non‐renewable δ‐valerolactone and ?‐caprolactone. A combination of ROP and living radical polymerization Reversible Addition‐Fragmentation Chain Transfer is proposed here to synthesize grafted block copolymers. They are able to self‐assemble in water, forming micelles where the lipophilic polyester core is able to entrap a lipophilic drug, thus making the system a good candidate for drug delivery. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55 , 3788–3797     

3β‐Acetoxy‐5α,6β‐di­hydroxybisnorcholanic acid 2216 lactone

In the title compound, C₂₄H₃₆O₆, the ester linkage in ring A is equatorial. The six‐membered rings A, B and C have chair conformations. The five‐membered ring D adopts a 13β,14α‐half‐chair conformation and the E ring adopts an envelope conformation. The A/B, B/C and C/D ring junctions are trans, whereas the D/E junction is cis.     

16‐(4‐Cyanobenzylidene)‐3β‐pyrrolidinoandrost‐5‐en‐17β‐ol monohydrate

In the title compound, C₃₁H₄₀N₂O·H₂O, the outer two six‐membered rings are in chair conformations, while the central ring is in an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation. The five‐membered ring adopts a 13β‐envelope conformation and the cyano­benzyl­idene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the hydroxyl group at position 17. The steroid nuclei are linked by intermolecular O—H?O and O—H?N hydrogen bonds to form a molecular network. The molecular packing has an interesting feature, with the steroids aligned parallel to the b axis, forming a closed loop through hydrogen bonds linked via water mol­ecules.     

2,3:4,6‐Di‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐l‐sorbofuranose and 2,3‐O‐isopropylidene‐α‐l‐sorbofuranose

In the title compounds, C₁₂H₂₀O₆, (I), and C₉H₁₆O₆, (II), the five‐membered furanose ring adopts a ⁴T₃ conformation and the five‐membered 1,3‐dioxolane ring adopts an E₃ conformation. The six‐membered 1,3‐dioxane ring in (I) adopts an almost ideal ^OC₃ conformation. The hydrogen‐bonding patterns for these compounds differ substantially: (I) features just one intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bond [O...O = 2.933 (3) Å], whereas (II) exhibits, apart from the corresponding intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bond [O...O = 2.7638 (13) Å], two intermolecular bonds of this type [O...O = 2.7708 (13) and 2.7730 (12) Å]. This study illustrates both the similarity between the conformations of furanose, 1,3‐dioxolane and 1,3‐dioxane rings in analogous isopropylidene‐substituted carbohydrate structures and the only negligible influence of the presence of a 1,3‐dioxane ring on the conformations of furanose and 1,3‐dioxolane rings. In addition, in comparison with reported analogs, replacement of the –CH₂OH group at the C1‐furanose position by another group can considerably affect the conformation of the 1,3‐dioxolane ring.     

2‐Propynyl 2,3,4,6‐tetra‐O‐acetyl‐α‐d‐mannopyranoside

The 2‐propynyl group in the title compound, C₁₇H₂₂O₁₀, adopts an exoanomeric conformation, with the acetylenic group gauche with respect to position C1. Comparison of ¹³C NMR chemical shifts from solution and the solid state suggest that the acetylenic group also adopts a conformation anti to C1 in solution. The pyranose ring adopts a ⁴C₁ conformation. Of the three secondary O‐acetyl groups, that on position O4, flanked by two equatorial groups, adopts a syn conformation, in agreement with recent generalizations [González‐Outeiriño, Nasser & Anderson (2005). J. Org. Chem. 70 , 2486–2493]. The acetyl group on position O3 adopts a gauche conformation, also in agreement with the recent generalizations, but that on position O2 adopts a syn conformation, not in agreement with the recent generalizations.     

3β‐(1‐Allyl‐1‐pyrrolidinio)‐16‐(2‐pyridylmethylene)androst‐5‐en‐17β‐ol bromide hemihydrate

The title compound, C₃₂H₄₅N₂O⁺·Br^?·0.5H₂O, has the outer two six‐membered rings in chair conformations, while the central ring is in an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation. The five‐mem­bered ring of the steroid nucleus adopts a slightly deformed 14α‐envelope conformation. The pyridyl­methyl­ene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the hydroxyl group at position 17. The structure is stabilized by a network of O—H?Br‐type intermolecular hydrogen bonds.     

16‐[3‐Methoxy‐4‐(2‐piperidin‐1‐yl­ethoxy)­benzyl­idene]‐17‐oxoandrost‐5‐en‐3β‐yl acetate monohydrate

The title compound, C₃₆H₄₉NO₅·H₂O, has the outer two six‐membered rings of the steroid nucleus in chair conformations. The central ring B of the steroid nucleus is in an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation, while ring D of the steroid adopts a slightly distorted 13β,14α‐half‐chair conformation. The piperidine ring is in a chair conformation. The methoxy­benzyl­idene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the carbonyl group at position 17. Intermolecular O—H?O and O—H?N hydrogen bonds link the steroid and water mol­ecules into chains which run parallel to the b axis.     

The first structurally analysed nucleic acid building block containing the Reese protecting group: 2′‐O‐[1‐(2‐fluorophenyl)‐4‐methoxypiperidin‐4‐yl]‐β‐D‐(1′R,2′R,3′R,4′R)‐uridine

The title compound, C₂₁H₂₆FN₃O₇, is assembled by N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds into well‐separated two‐dimensional layers of about 15 Å thickness. The crescent conformation of the molecules is stabilized by weak intramolecular C—H...O and C—H...F hydrogen bonds. The uridine moiety adopts an anti conformation. The ribofuranose ring exists in an envelope conformation. All the endocyclic uracil bonds are shorter than normal single C—N and C—C bonds, and five of them have comparable lengths, which implies a considerable degree of delocalization of the electron density within this ring.     

6‐[3‐Hydroxy‐17‐oxoestra‐1,3,5(10)‐trien‐7β‐yl]­hexane­nitrile

In the title compound, C₂₄H₃₁NO₂, ring B adopts a conformation between the boat and twisted‐boat forms. This conformation best accommodates adverse intramolecular H⋯H interactions between the H atoms of the 7β‐substituent and the two nearest ring H atoms. The tilt angle between rings A and D is 28.6 (1)°.     

4‐(3,17‐Dioxoandrost‐4‐en‐16‐ylidenemethyl)benzonitrile

The title compound, C₂₇H₂₉NO₂, has the outer six‐membered ring in a sofa conformation, while the central rings are in chair conformations. The five‐membered ring adopts a slightly distorted 13β,14α‐half‐chair conformation. The cyano­benzyl­idene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the carbonyl group at position 17.     

Poly[(μ6‐rac‐cis‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐dicarboxylato)strontium]

In the title layered coordination polymer, [Sr(C₈H₁₀O₄)]_n, the strontium ion adopts a distorted square‐antiprismatic SrO₈ geometry, arising from its coordination by six different cis‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐dicarboxylate dianions (two bidentate and four monodentate). Within the dianion, the cyclohexane ring adopts a chair conformation and the dihedral angle between the planes of the –CO₂⁻ groups is 80.4 (6)°. The polyhedral linkage pattern leads to (100) sheets in the crystal in which the SrO₈ groups share triangular faces and edges in which the Sr...Sr topological connectivity is a 6³ net. The crystal studied was a nonmerohedral twin, with the components related by a 180° rotation about [100].     

17‐Oxo‐16‐(2‐pyridyl­methyl­ene)­androst‐5‐en‐3β‐ol monohydrate

The title compound, C₂₅H₃₁NO₂·H₂O, has the outer two six‐membered rings in chair conformations, while the central ring is in an 8β,9α‐half‐chair conformation. The five‐membered ring adopts a 13,14‐half‐chair conformation. The pyridyl­methyl­ene moiety has an E configuration with respect to the carbonyl group at position 17. The structure is stabilized by intermolecular O—H?N and O—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

4‐[1‐(Phenylsulfonyl)indol‐3‐yl]‐3a,4,5,9b‐tetrahydro‐3H‐cyclopenta[c]quinoline

In the title compound, C₂₆H₂₂N₂O₂S, the tetra­hydro­pyridine ring has a conformation intermediate between half‐chair and sofa. The tetrahydroquinoline mean plane makes a dihedral angle of 73.3 (1)° with the cyclopentene ring, which adopts an envelope conformation, and an angle of 45.45 (4)° with the indole best plane. The dihedral angle between the benzene and pyrrole rings is 2.6 (1)°. The orientations of the phenyl ring on the sulfonyl group and of the indole are governed by weak C—H?O interactions. The packing of the mol­ecule in the solid state is stabilized by C—H?O and C—H?N hydrogen bonds.     

3′,4′‐Bis(4‐chloro­phenyl)­spiro­[chroman‐3,5′(4′H)‐isoxazol]‐4‐one

The title compound, C₂₃H₁₅Cl₂NO₃, crystallizes with two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. The chroman­one moiety consists of a benzene ring fused with a six‐membered heterocyclic ring which adopts a sofa conformation. The five‐membered spiro­isoxazoline ring is in an envelope conformation. The p‐chloro­phenyl rings bridged by the five‐membered ring are nearly perpendicular to each other. The chromanone moiety of one mol­ecule packs into the cavity formed by the p‐chloro­phenyl rings of a second mol­ecule through the formation of C—H?π interactions. The structure is stabilized by weak C—H?O, C—H?Cl and C—H?π interactions.     

(1S,3R,8S,9S,10R)‐2,2‐Dichloro‐9,10‐epoxy‐3,7,7,10‐tetramethyltricyclo[6.4.0.01,3]dodecane and (1S,3R,8S,10R)‐2,2‐dichloro‐3,7,7,10‐tetramethyltricyclo[6.4.0.01,3]dodecan‐9‐one

The stereochemistries of the title compounds, both C₁₆H₂₄Cl₂O, have been established by X‐ray diffraction. In both structures, the seven‐membered ring adopts the same conformation, whereas the six‐membered ring shows an envelope conformation in the epoxy­do­decane structure and a boat conformation in the dodecan‐9‐one structure.