Structural deformation and host–guest properties of doubly-reduced cycloparaphenylenes, [n]CPPs2− (n = 6, 8, 10, and 12)

Chemical reduction of several cycloparaphenylenes (CPPs) ranging in size from [8]CPP to [12]CPP has been investigated with potassium metal in THF. The X-ray diffraction characterization of the resulting doubly-reduced [n]CPPs provided a unique series of carbon nanohoops with increasing dimensions and core flexibility for the first comprehensive structural analysis. The consequences of electron acquisition by a [n]CPP core have been analyzed in comparison with the neutral parents. The addition of two electrons to the cyclic carbon framework of [n]CPPs leads to the characteristic elliptic core distortion and facilitates the internal encapsulation of sizable cationic guests. Molecular and solid-state structure changes, alkali metal binding and unique size-dependent host abilities of the [n]CPP²⁻ series with n = 6–12 are discussed. This in-depth analysis opens new perspectives in supramolecular chemistry of [n]CPPs and promotes their applications in size-selective guest encapsulation and chemical separation.

The series of doubly-reduced cycloparaphenylenes (CPPs) with increasing dimensions and flexibility shows the size-dependent structural changes and enhanced host abilities.     

A Macrocyclic Gold(I)–Biphenylene Complex: Triangular Molecular Structure with Twisted Au2(diphosphine) Corners and Reductive Elimination of [6]Cycloparaphenylene

The digold(I) complex [Au₂Cl₂(Cy₂PCH₂PCy₂)] reacts with 4,4′-diphenylene diboronic acid to form a triangular macrocyclic complex with twisted Au-P-C-P-Au groups at the three corners. The synthesis of the complex and its chemical oxidation produced [6]cycloparaphenylene ([6]CPP) in 59 % overall yield.     

Cycloparaphenylene‐Based Ionic Donor–Acceptor Supramolecule: Isolation and Characterization of Li+@C60⊂[10]CPP

The first cycloparaphenylene (CPP)‐based ionic donor–acceptor supramolecule Li⁺@C₆₀?[10]CPP?X^? has been synthesized. X‐ray crystallography not only confirmed the molecular structure of Li⁺@C₆₀?[10]CPP?X^? but also uncovered the formation of a unique ionic crystal. The strong charge‐transfer interaction between [10]CPP and Li⁺@C₆₀, which was confirmed by electrochemical measurement and spectroscopic analyses, caused significant delocalization of the positive charge across the entire complex.     

Electronic Communication between two [10]cycloparaphenylenes and Bis(azafullerene) (C59N)2 Induced by Cooperative Complexation

The complex of [10]cycloparaphenylene ([10]CPP) with bis(azafullerene) (C₅₉N)₂ is investigated experimentally and computationally. Two [10]CPP rings are bound to the dimeric azafullerene giving [10]CPP?(C₅₉N)₂?[10]CPP. Photophysical and redox properties support an electronic interaction between the components especially when the second [10]CPP is bound. Unlike [10]CPP?C₆₀, in which there is negligible electronic communication between the two species, upon photoexcitation a partial charge transfer phenomenon is revealed between [10]CPP and (C₅₉N)₂ reminiscent of CPP‐encapsulated metallofullerenes. Such an alternative electron‐rich fullerene species demonstrates C₆₀‐like ground‐state properties and metallofullerene‐like excited‐state properties opening new avenues for construction of functional supramolecular architectures with organic materials.     

Capture and displacement-based release of the bicarbonate anion by calix[4]pyrroles with small rigid straps

Two-phenoxy walled calix[4]pyrroles 1 and 2 strapped with small rigid linkers containing pyridine and benzene, respectively, have been synthesized. ¹H NMR spectroscopic analyses carried out in CDCl₃ revealed that both of receptors 1 and 2 recognize only F⁻ and HCO₃⁻ among various test anions with high preference for HCO₃⁻ (as the tetraethylammonium, TEA⁺ salt) relative to F⁻ (as the TBA⁺ salt). The bound HCO₃⁻ anion was completely released out of the receptors upon the addition of F⁻ (as the tetrabutylammonium, TBA⁺ salt) as a result of significantly enhanced affinities and selectivities of the receptors for F⁻ once converted to the TEAHCO₃ complexes. Consequently, relatively stable TEAF complexes of receptors 1 and 2 were formed via anion metathesis occurring within the receptor cavities. By contrast, the direct addition of TEAF to receptors 1 and 2 produces different complexation products initially, although eventually the same TEAF complexes are produced as via sequential TEAHCO₃ and TBAF addition. These findings are rationalized in terms of the formation of different ion pair complexes involving interactions both inside and outside of the core receptor framework.

The inherent selectivity of anion receptors can be reversed by ion pairing occurring both inside and outside of the receptor cavity.     

Trends in trigonal prismatic Ln-[1]ferrocenophane complexes and discovery of a Ho3+ single-molecule magnet

Lanthanide metallocenophanes are an intriguing class of organometallic complexes that feature rare six-coordinate trigonal prismatic coordination environments of 4f elements with close intramolecular proximity to transition metal ions. Herein, we present a systematic study of the structural and magnetic properties of the ferrocenophanes, [LnFc₃(THF)₂Li₂]⁻, of the late trivalent lanthanide ions (Ln = Gd (1), Ho (2), Er (3), Tm (4), Yb (5), Lu (6)). One major structural trend within this class of complexes is the increasing diferrocenyl (Fc²⁻) average twist angle with decreasing ionic radius (r_ion) of the central Ln ion, resulting in the largest average Fc²⁻ twist angles for the Lu³⁺ compound 6. Such high sensitivity of the twist angle to changes in r_ion is unique to the here presented ferrocenophane complexes and likely due to the large trigonal plane separation enforced by the ligand (>3.2 Å). This geometry also allows the non-Kramers ion Ho³⁺ to exhibit slow magnetic relaxation in the absence of applied dc fields, rendering compound 2 a rare example of a Ho-based single-molecule magnet (SMM) with barriers to magnetization reversal (U) of 110–131 cm⁻¹. In contrast, compounds featuring Ln ions with prolate electron density (3–5) don''t show slow magnetization dynamics under the same conditions. The observed trends in magnetic properties of 2–5 are supported by state-of-the-art ab initio calculations. Finally, the magneto-structural relationship of the trigonal prismatic Ho-[1]ferrocenophane motif was further investigated by axial ligand (THF in 2) exchange to yield [HoFc₃(THF*)₂Li₂]⁻ (2-THF*) and [HoFc₃(py)₂Li₂]⁻ (2-py) motifs. We find that larger average Fc²⁻ twist angles (in 2-THF* and 2-py as compared to in 2) result in faster magnetic relaxation times at a given temperature.

Lanthanide ferrocenophanes are an intriguing class of organometallic complexes that feature rare six-coordinate trigonal prismatic coordination environments of 4f elements with close intramolecular proximity to iron ions.     

[10]CPP-Based Inclusion Complexes of Charged Fulleropyrrolidines. Effect of the Charge Location on the Photoinduced Electron Transfer

A number of non-covalently bound donor-acceptor dyads, consisting of C₆₀ as the electron acceptor and cycloparaphenylene (CPP) as the electron donor, have been reported. A hypsochromic shift of the charge transfer (CT) band in polar medium has been found in [10]CPP⊃Li⁺@C₆₀ . To explore this anomalous effect, we study inclusion complexes [10]CPP⊃Li⁺@C₆₀-MP , [10]CPP⊃C₆₀-MPH⁺ , and [10]CPP⊃C₆₀-PPyMe⁺ formed by fulleropyrrolidine derivatives and [10]CPP using the DFT/TDDFT approach. We show that the introduction of a positively charged fragment into fullerene stabilizes CT states that become the lowest-lying excited states. These charge-separated states can be generated by the decay of locally excited states on a nanosecond to picosecond time scale. The distance of the charged fragment to the center of the fullerenic cage and its accessibility to the solvent determine the strength of the hypsochromic shift.     

Regioselective Synthesis and Characterization of Multinuclear Convex‐Bound Ruthenium‐[n]Cycloparaphenylene (n=5 and 6) Complexes

Mono‐ and multinuclear complexes of ruthenium and [n]cycloparaphenylene (CPP, n=5 and 6) were synthesized in excellent yields through ligand exchange of the cationic complex [(Cp)Ru(CH₃CN)₃](PF₆) with CPP. In the multinuclear complexes, ruthenium selectively coordinated to alternate paraphenylene units to give bis‐ and tris‐coordinated Ru complexes for [5] and [6]CPPs, respectively. Single‐crystal X‐ray analysis revealed the Ru was coordinated with η⁶‐hapticity on the convex surface of CPP.     

FLP-type nitrile activation and cyclic ether ring-opening by halo-borane nonagermanide-cluster Lewis acid–base pairs

Even though homoatomic nine-atom germanium clusters are known for two decades, their chemical properties are still rarely investigated. We now discovered that Zintl ion main group-element clusters possess a reactive lone pair of electrons, and we show a new pathway to bind ligands with functional groups to the [Ge₉] cluster core through Ge–C bond formation. We report on the reactivity of [Ge₉{Si(TMS)₃}₂]²⁻ (TMS = trimethylsilyl) towards a series of Lewis acidic bromo-boranes. The reaction of [Ge₉{Si(TMS)₃}₂]²⁻ and DAB^o-tol–Br (DAB = 1,3,2-diazaborolidine; o-tol = 2-methylphenyl) resulted, depending on the reaction protocol, either in the formation of [Ge₉{Si(TMS)₃}₂DAB^o-tol]⁻ (1a) with direct Ge–B interactions, or in [Ge₉{Si(TMS)₃}₂(CH₂)₄O–DAB^o-tol]⁻ (2a) featuring a ring-opened thf moiety. Ring opening reactions occur for all bulkier DAB^R–Br [R: o-xyl (2,6-dimethylphenyl), Mes (2,4,6-trimethylphenyl), Dipp (2,6-diisopropylphenyl)], DAB(ii)^Dipp–Br and acyclic (ⁱPr₂N)₂BBr without Ge–B bond formation as shown for the structural characterization of the ring-opened products of thf (3, 4) and trimethylene oxide (5). In contrast to thf, the activation of CH₃CN requires the simultaneous presence of Lewis-acid and Lewis-basic reactants allowing the formation of [Ge₉{Si(TMS)₃}₂CH₃C N–DAB^Mes]⁻ (6a). Within the presented compounds, 3 and 4 show an unusual substitution pattern of the three ligands at the [Ge₉] core in the solid state. The [Ge₉] cluster/borane systems correspond to intermolecular frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs), in which the [Ge₉] cluster with several lone pairs represents the Lewis base, and the borane is the Lewis acid.

The reactivity of the lone pairs in polyhedral Zintl anions is shown by the reaction of the bis-silylated cluster [Ge₉{Si(TMS)₃}₂]²⁻ accomplishing cyclic-ether ring-opening or nitrile activation according to a FLP-like mechanism with bromo-boranes.     

Delocalization tunable by ligand substitution in [L2Al]n− complexes highlights a mechanism for strong electronic coupling

Ligand-based mixed valent (MV) complexes of Al(iii) incorporating electron donating (ED) and electron withdrawing (EW) substituents on bis(imino)pyridine ligands (I₂P) have been prepared. The MV states containing EW groups are both assigned as Class II/III, and those with ED functional groups are Class III and Class II/III in the (I₂P⁻)(I₂P²⁻)Al and [(I₂P²⁻)(I₂P³⁻)Al]²⁻ charge states, respectively. No abrupt changes in delocalization are observed with ED and EW groups and from this we infer that ligand and metal valence p-orbitals are well-matched in energy and the absence of LMCT and MLCT bands supports the delocalized electronic structures. The MV ligand charge states (I₂P⁻)(I₂P²⁻)Al and [(I₂P²⁻)(I₂P³⁻)Al]²⁻ show intervalence charge transfer (IVCT) transitions in the regions 6850–7740 and 7410–9780 cm⁻¹, respectively. Alkali metal cations in solution had no effect on the IVCT bands of [(I₂P²⁻)(I₂P³⁻)Al]²⁻ complexes containing –PhNMe₂ or –PhF₅ substituents. Minor localization of charge in [(I₂P²⁻)(I₂P³⁻)Al]²⁻ was observed when –PhOMe substituents are included.

Organo-aluminum mixed-valent complexes combine properties of both organic and transition element mixed-valent compounds. This supports delocalized electronic structures that are structurally and electronically tunable.     

Anion mediated,tunable isoguanosine self-assemblies: decoding the conformation influence and solvent effects

Systematic investigations were performed with various substituted groups at C8 purine and ribose. A series of isoG analogs, C8-phenyl substituted isoG were synthesized and applied for Cs⁺ coordination. The structural proximity between purine and ribose limited pentaplex formation for C8-phenyl substituted isoG derivatives. Based on this observation, deoxy isoG derivative with modification on ribose (tert-butyldimethylsilyl ether) was applied to assemble with the Cs⁺ cation. Critical solvent (CDCl₃ and CD₃CN) and anion (BPh₄⁻, BARF⁻, and PF₆⁻) effects were revealed, leading to the controllable formation of various stable isoG pentaplexes, including singly charged decamer, doubly charged decamer, and 15-mer, etc. Finally, the X-ray crystal structure of [isoG₂₀Cs₃]³⁺(BARF⁻)₃ was successfully obtained, which is the first example of multiple-layer deoxy isoG binding with the Cs⁺ cation, providing solid evidence of this new isoG ionophore beyond two-layer sandwich self-assembly.

The first example of multiple-layer deoxy isoG self-assembly was characterized by X-ray crystal structure. Critical solvent and anion effects were revealed, leading to the controllable formation of various stable isoG assemblies.     

“Anti-electrostatic” halogen bonding in solution

Halogen-bonded (XB) complexes between halide anions and a cyclopropenylium-based anionic XB donor were characterized in solution for the first time. Spontaneous formation of such complexes confirms that halogen bonding is sufficiently strong to overcome electrostatic repulsion between two anions. The formation constants of such “anti-electrostatic” associations are comparable to those formed by halides with neutral halogenated electrophiles. However, while the latter usually show charge-transfer absorption bands, the UV-Vis spectra of the anion–anion complexes examined herein are determined by the electronic excitations within the XB donor. The identification of XB anion–anion complexes substantially extends the range of the feasible XB systems, and it provides vital information for the discussion of the nature of this interaction.

Spontaneous formation of “anti-electrostatic” complexes in solution demonstrates that halogen bonding can be sufficiently strong to overcome anion–anion repulsion when the latter is attenuated by the polar medium.

Halogen bonding (XB) is an attractive interaction between a Lewis base (LB) and a halogenated compound, exhibiting an electrophilic region on the halogen atom.¹ It is most commonly related to electrostatic interaction between an electron-rich species (XB acceptor) and an area of positive electrostatic potential (σ-holes) on the surface of the halogen substituent in the electrophilic molecule (XB donor).² Provided that mutual polarization of the interacting species is taken into account, the σ-hole model explains geometric features and the variation of stabilities of XB associations, especially in the series of relatively weak complexes.³ Based on the definition of halogen bonding and its electrostatic interpretation, this interaction is expected to involve either cationic or neutral XB donors. Electrostatic interaction of anionic halogenated species with electron-rich XB acceptors, however, seems to be repulsive, especially if the latter are also anionic. Yet, computational analyses predicted that halogen bonding between ions of like charges, called “anti-electrostatic” halogen bonding (AEXB),⁴ can possibly be formed^5–12 and the first examples of AEXB complexes formed by different anions, i.e. halide anions and the anionic iodinated bis(dicyanomethylene)cyclopropanide derivatives 1 (see Scheme 1) or the anionic tetraiodo-p-benzoquinone radical, were characterized recently in the solid state.^13,14 The identification of such complexes substantially extends the range of feasible XB systems, and it provides vital information for the discussion of the nature of this interaction. Computational results, however, significantly depend on the used methods and applied media (gas phase vs. polar environment and solvation models) and the solid state arrangements of the XB species might be affected by crystal forces and/or counterions. Unambiguous confirmation of the stability of the halogen-bonded anion–anion complexes and verification of their thermodynamic characteristics thus requires experimental characterization of the spontaneous formation of such associations in solution. Still, while the solution-phase complexes formed by hydrogen bonding between two anionic species were reported previously,^15–17 there is currently no example of “anti-electrostatic” XB in solution.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Structures of the XB donor 1 and its hydrogen-substituted analogue 2.To examine halogen bonding between two anions in solution, we turn to the interaction between halides and 1,2-bis(dicyanomethylene)-3-iodo-cyclopropanide 1 (Scheme 1).^‡ Even though this compound features a cationic cyclopropenylium core, it is overall anionic, and calculations have demonstrated that its electrostatic potential is universally negative across its entire surface.¹³ The solution of 1 (with tris(dimethylamino)cyclopropenium (TDA) as counterion) in acetonitrile is characterized by an absorption band at 288 nm with ε = 2.3 × 10⁴ M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ (Fig. 1). As LB, we first applied iodide anions taken as a salt with n-tetrabutylammonium counter-ion, Bu₄NI. This salt does not show absorption bands above 290 nm, but its addition to a solution of 1 led to a rise of absorption in the 290–350 nm range (Fig. 1). Subtraction of the absorption of the individual components from that of their mixture produced a differential spectrum which shows a maximum at about 301 nm (insert in Fig. 1). At constant concentration of the XB donor (1) and constant ionic strength, the intensity of the absorption in the range of 280–300 nm (and hence differential absorbance, ΔAbs) rises with increasing iodide concentration (Fig. S1 in the ESI^†). This suggests that the interaction of iodide with 1 results in the formation of the [1, I⁻]-complex which shows a higher absorptivity in this spectral range (eqn (1)):1 + X⁻ ⇌ [1, X⁻]1Open in a separate windowFig. 1Spectra of acetonitrile solutions with constant concentration of 1 (0.60 mM) and various concentrations of Bu₄NI (6.0, 13, 32, 49, 75, 115 and 250 mM, solid lines from the bottom to the top). The dashed lines show spectra of the individual solutions 1 (c = 0.60 mM, red line) and Bu₄NI (c = 250 mM, blue line). The ionic strength was maintained using Bu₄NPF₆. Insert: Differential spectra of the solutions obtained by subtraction of the absorption of the individual components from the spectra of their corresponding mixtures.To clarify the mode of interaction between 1 and iodide in the complex, we also performed analogous measurements with the hydrogen-substituted compound 2 (see Scheme 1). The addition of iodide to a solution of 2 in acetonitrile did not increase the absorption in the 280–300 nm spectral range. Instead, some decrease of the absorption band intensity of 2 with the increase of concentration of I⁻ anions was observed (Fig. S2 in the ESI^†). Such changes are related to a blue shift of this band resulting from the hydrogen bonding between 2 and iodide (formation of hydrogen-bonded [2, I⁻] complex is corroborated by the observation of the small shift of the NMR signal of the proton of 2 to the higher ppm values in the presence of I⁻ anions, see Fig. S3 in the ESI^†).^§ Furthermore, since H-compound 2 should be at least as suitable as XB donor 1 to form anion–π complexes with the halide, this finding (as well as solid-state and computational data^¶) rules out that any increase in absorption in this region observed with the I-compound 1 may be due to this alternative interaction.Likewise, the addition of NBu₄I to a solution of TDA cations taken as a salt with Cl⁻ anions did not result in an increase in the relevant region. Hence, we could also rule out anion–π interactions with the TDA counter-ions as source of the observed changes, which is in line with previous reports on the electron-rich nature of TDA.¹⁸All these observations (supported by the computational analysis, vide infra) indicate that the [1, I⁻] complex (eqn (1)) is formed via halogen bonding of I⁻ with iodine substituents in 1. The changes in the intensities of the differential absorption ΔAbs as a function of the iodide concentration (with constant concentration of XB donor (1) as well as constant ionic strength) are well-modelled by the 1 : 1 binding isotherm (Fig. S1 in the ESI^†). The fit of the absorption data produced a formation constant of K = 15 M⁻¹ for the [1, I⁻] complex (Table 1).^|| The overlap with the absorption of the individual XB donor hindered the accurate evaluation of the position and intensity of the absorption band of the corresponding complex which is formed upon LB-addition to 1. As such, the values of Δλ_max shown in Table 1 represent a wavelength of the largest difference in the absorptivity of the [1, I⁻] complex and individual anion 1, and Δε reflects the difference of their absorptivity at this point (see the ESI^† for the details of calculations).Equilibrium constants and spectral characteristics of the complexes of 1 with halide anions X⁻

Understanding how Lewis acids dope organic semiconductors: a “complex” story

We report on computational studies of the potential of three borane Lewis acids (LAs) (B(C₆F₅)₃ (BCF), BF₃, and BBr₃) to form stable adducts and/or to generate positive polarons with three different semiconducting π-conjugated polymers (PFPT, PCPDTPT and PCPDTBT). Density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations based on range-separated hybrid (RSH) functionals provide insight into changes in the electronic structure and optical properties upon adduct formation between LAs and the two polymers containing pyridine moieties, PFPT and PCPDTPT, unravelling the complex interplay between partial hybridization, charge transfer and changes in the polymer backbone conformation. We then assess the potential of BCF to induce p-doping in PCPDTBT, which does not contain pyridine groups, by computing the energetics of various reaction mechanisms proposed in the literature. We find that reaction of BCF(OH₂) to form protonated PCPDTBT and [BCF(OH)]⁻, followed by electron transfer from a pristine to a protonated PCPDTBT chain is highly endergonic, and thus unlikely at low doping concentration. The theoretical and experimental data can, however, be reconciled if one considers the formation of [BCF(OH)BCF]⁻ or [BCF(OH)(OH₂)BCF]⁻ counterions rather than [BCF(OH)]⁻ and invokes subsequent reactions resulting in the elimination of H₂.

Here we report on DFT calculations investigating the mechanistic aspects in doping organic semiconductors by the use of Lewis acids. Our results highlight the role played by the formation of diboron-containing bridged anions in the doping mechanism.     

Achieving high circularly polarized luminescence with push–pull helicenic systems: from rationalized design to top-emission CP-OLED applications

While the development of chiral molecules displaying circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) has received considerable attention, the corresponding CPL intensity, g_lum, hardly exceeds 10⁻² at the molecular level owing to the difficulty in optimizing the key parameters governing such a luminescence process. To address this challenge, we report here the synthesis and chiroptical properties of a new family of π-helical push–pull systems based on carbo[6]helicene, where the latter acts as either a chiral electron acceptor or a donor unit. This comprehensive experimental and theoretical investigation shows that the magnitude and relative orientation of the electric (μ_e) and magnetic (μ_m) dipole transition moments can be tuned efficiently with regard to the molecular chiroptical properties, which results in high g_lum values, i.e. up to 3–4 × 10⁻². Our investigations revealed that the optimized mutual orientation of the electric and magnetic dipoles in the excited state is a crucial parameter to achieve intense helicene-mediated exciton coupling, which is a major contributor to the obtained strong CPL. Finally, top-emission CP-OLEDs were fabricated through vapor deposition, which afforded a promising g_El of around 8 × 10⁻³. These results bring about further molecular design guidelines to reach high CPL intensity and offer new insights into the development of innovative CP-OLED architectures.

A CPL intensity of up to 3 × 10⁻² is achieved in π-extended 6-helicene derivatives, owing to an intense helicene-mediated exciton coupling. Corresponding top-emission CP-OLEDs afforded a promising g_El of around 8 × 10⁻³.

The design of chiral emitters displaying intense circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) has attracted significant interest, thanks to the potential of CP light in a diverse range of applications going from chiroptoelectronics (organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), optical information processing, etc.) to bio-imaging and chiral sensing.¹ Recently, designing OLEDs with CP electroluminescence (CP-OLEDs) has emerged as an interesting approach to improve high-resolution display performance. Namely, using unpolarised OLEDs, up to 50% of the emitted light can be lost due to the use of antiglare polarized filters.² In CP-OLEDs, the electro-generated light can pass these filters with less attenuation owing to its circular polarization and thus lead to an increase of the image brightness with lower power consumption.³ To develop CP-OLED devices, the main approach relies on the doping of the device''s emitting layer by a CPL emitter, which should ensure simultaneously high exciton conversion and a high degree of circular polarization. The harvesting of both singlet and triplet excitons has been successfully addressed using either chiral phosphorescent materials or thermally activated delayed fluorescence (CP-TADF) emitters with device efficiencies of up to 32%.⁴ However, the intensity of circularly polarized electroluminescence (CPEL), evaluated by the corresponding dissymmetry factor g_El, remains inefficient and typically falls within the range of 10⁻³ with limited examples reaching g_El > 10⁻² based on polymeric materials and lanthanide complexes.⁵ For CP-OLEDs using a molecular chiral emissive dopant, g_El, defined as the ratio between the intensity difference of left- and right-CPEL, and the total generated electroluminescence, 2(El_L − El_R)/(El_L + El_R), can be generally related to the luminescence dissymmetry factor g_lum measured in diluted solution.² Accordingly, it is of crucial importance to design luminescent molecules with high g_lum values,^3,28a–d,29 in order to reach strong CP electro-luminescence when going to practical devices. However, structural and electronic factors that govern the CPL of chiral compounds are still poorly understood even if a few studies have recently tried to rationalize and establish molecular guidelines to obtain high g_lum values.⁶Our team has contributed to the research in this area by developing extended π-helical molecular architectures resulting from the association of carbo[6]helicene and achiral dyes,⁷ which afforded enhanced chiroptical properties, with notably a g_lum up to 10⁻², owing to an uncommon chiral exciton coupling process mediated by the chiral helicenic unit.⁸ In addition, we also described an unusual solvent effect on the intensity of CPL of π-helical push–pull helicene–naphthalimide derivatives,^7b which showed a decrease of g_lum from 10⁻² to 10⁻³ upon increasing the polarity of solvent.^7b This solvatochromism effect was shown to be related to a symmetry breaking of the chiral excited state before emission,⁹ which modifies the relative intensity of the magnetic (μ_m) and electric (μ_e) dipole transition moments, and the angle, θ, between them (Fig. 1), ultimately impacting g_lum. The latter is well approximated as 4|m|cos θ/(|μ|) for an electric dipole-allowed transition.¹⁰Open in a separate windowFig. 1Chemical structures of “push–pull” 2,15-diethynylhexahelicene-based emitters with their polarized luminescence characteristics including their calculated electric and magnetic transition dipole moments and the angle between them corresponding to the S₁ → S₀ transition.While these results highlight interesting aspects regarding the key parameters influencing the CPL of organic emitters, this type of “helical push–pull design” remains limited to only one example, which render the systematic rationalization of these findings difficult. Accordingly, we decided to develop a complete family of new chiral push–pull compounds to explore the structural and electronic impact of the grafted substituents on the helical π-conjugated system. In addition, we went a step further and incorporated the designed chiral emitter into proof-of-concept CP-OLEDs using a top-emission architecture,¹¹ which remains scarcely explored for CP-light generation despite its considerable potential for micro-display applications. To the best of our knowledge, only one example of such type of electroluminescent device has been reported, using a CP-TADF emitter, affording a modest g_El of 10⁻³.^11aHerein, we report the synthesis and chiroptical properties of a new family of π-helical push–pull systems based on chiral carbo[6]helicene, functionalized by either electron donor or acceptor units. Interestingly, the chiral π-conjugated system of the helicene may act as either an electron acceptor or a donor, depending on the nature of the attached substituents, thereby impacting the chiroptical properties, notably the resulting CPL. By optimizing the chiral exciton coupling process through the modulation of the magnitude and relative orientation of the electric (μ) and magnetic (m) dipoles, the chiroptical properties of classical carbo[6]helicene-based emitters can be dramatically enhanced and reach high g_lum values at the molecular level, i.e. up to 3–4 × 10⁻². Experimental and theoretical investigations revealed that the mutual orientation of the electric and magnetic dipoles in the excited-state is a crucial parameter and is optimal when the substituents attached to the helicene core possess a rather weak electron withdrawing or donating ability. Finally, proof of concept top-emission CP-OLEDs were fabricated through vapor deposition of π-helical push–pull derivatives and afforded a g_El of around 8 × 10⁻³, which represents a significant improvement for the polarization of electroluminescence emitted using this device architecture.     

A Long‐Lived Azafullerenyl Radical Stabilized by Supramolecular Shielding with a [10]Cycloparaphenylene

A major handicap towards the exploitation of radicals is their inherent instability. In the paramagnetic azafullerenyl radical C₅₉N^., the unpaired electron is strongly localized next to the nitrogen atom, which induces dimerization to diamagnetic bis(azafullerene), (C₅₉N)₂. Conventional stabilization by introducing steric hindrance around the radical is inapplicable here because of the concave fullerene geometry. Instead, we developed an innovative radical shielding approach based on supramolecular complexation, exploiting the protection offered by a [10]cycloparaphenylene ([10]CPP) nanobelt encircling the C₅₉N^. radical. Photoinduced radical generation is increased by a factor of 300. The EPR signal showing characteristic ¹⁴N hyperfine splitting of C₅₉N^.? [10]CPP was traced even after several weeks, which corresponds to a lifetime increase of >10⁸. The proposed approach can be generalized by tuning the diameter of the employed nanobelts, opening new avenues for the design and exploitation of radical fullerenes.     

A Supramolecular [10]CPP Junction Enables Efficient Electron Transfer in Modular Porphyrin–[10]CPP⊃Fullerene Complexes

Efficient photoinduced electron transfer was observed across a [10]cycloparaphenylene ([10]CPP) moiety that serves as a rigid non‐covalent bridge between a zinc porphyrin and a range of fullerenes. The preparation of iodo‐[10]CPP is the key to the synthesis of a porphyrin–[10]CPP conjugate, which binds C₆₀, C₇₀, (C₆₀)₂, and other fullerenes (K_A>10⁵ m ^?1). Fluorescence and pump–probe spectroscopy revealed intramolecular energy transfer between CPP and porphyrin and also efficient charge separation between porphyrin and fullerenes, affording up to 0.5 μs lifetime charge‐separated states. The advantage of this approach towards electron donor–acceptor dyads is evident in the case of dumbbell‐shaped (C₆₀)₂, which gave intricate charge‐transfer behavior in 1:1 and 2:1 complexes. These results suggest that [10]CPP and its cross‐coupled derivatives could act as supramolecular mediators of charge transport in organic electronic devices.     

Partial Charge Transfer in the Shortest Possible Metallofullerene Peapod,La@C82⊂[11]Cycloparaphenylene

[11]Cycloparaphenylene ([11]CPP) selectively encapsulates La@C₈₂ to form the shortest possible metallofullerene–carbon nanotube (CNT) peapod, La@C₈₂?[11]CPP, in solution and in the solid state. Complexation in solution was affected by the polarity of the solvent and was 16 times stronger in the polar solvent nitrobenzene than in the nonpolar solvent 1,2‐dichlorobenzene. Electrochemical analysis revealed that the redox potentials of La@C₈₂ were negatively shifted upon complexation from free La@C₈₂. Furthermore, the shifts in the redox potentials increased with polarity of the solvent. These results are consistent with formation of a polar complex, (La@C₈₂)^δ??[11]CPP^δ+, by partial electron transfer from [11]CPP to La@C₈₂. This is the first observation of such an electronic interaction between a fullerene pea and CPP pod. Theoretical calculations also supported partial charge transfer (0.07) from [11]CPP to La@C₈₂. The structure of the complex was unambiguously determined by X‐ray crystallographic analysis, which showed the La atom inside the C₈₂ near the periphery of the [11]CPP. The dipole moment of La@C₈₂ was projected toward the CPP pea, nearly perpendicular to the CPP axis. The position of the La atom and the direction of the dipole moment in La@C₈₂?[11]CPP were significantly different from those observed in La@C₈₂?CNT, thus indicating a difference in orientation of the fullerene peas between fullerene–CPP and fullerene–CNT peapods. These results highlight the importance of pea–pea interactions in determining the orientation of the metallofullerene in metallofullerene–CNT peapods.     

Biosynthesis of the catalytic H-cluster of [FeFe] hydrogenase: the roles of the Fe–S maturase proteins HydE,HydF, and HydG

[FeFe] hydrogenases carry out the redox interconversion of protons and molecular hydrogen (2H⁺ + 2e⁻ ⇌ H₂) at a complex Fe–S active site known as the H-cluster. The H-cluster consists of a [4Fe–4S] subcluster, denoted here as [4Fe]_H, linked via a cysteine sulfur to an interesting organometallic [2Fe]_H subcluster thought to be the subsite where the catalysis occurs. This [2Fe]_H subcluster consists of two Fe atoms, linked with a bridging CO and a bridging SCH₂NHCH₂S azadithiolate (adt), with additional terminal CO and CN ligands bound to each Fe. Synthesizing such a complex organometallic unit is a fascinating problem in biochemistry, complicated by the toxic nature of both the CO and CN⁻ species and the relative fragility of the azadithiolate bridge. It has been known for a number of years that this complex biosynthesis is carried out by a set of three essential Fe–S proteins, HydE, HydF, and HydG. HydF is a GTPase, while HydE and HydG are both members of the large family of radical S-adenosylmethionine (rSAM) enzymes. In this perspective we describe the history of research and discovery concerning these three Fe–S “maturase” proteins and describe recent evidence for a sequential biosynthetic pathway beginning with the synthesis of a mononuclear organometallic [Fe(ii)(CO)₂CN(cysteine)] complex by the rSAM enzyme HydG and its subsequent activation by the second rSAM enzyme HydE to form a highly reactive Fe(i)(CO)₂(CN)S species. In our model a pair of these Fe(i)(CO)₂(CN)S units condense to form the [Fe(CO)₂(CN)S]₂ diamond core of the [2Fe]_H cluster, requiring only the installation of the central CH₂NHCH₂ portion of the azadithiolate bridge, whose atoms are all sourced from the amino acid serine. This final step likely occurs with an interplay of HydE and HydF, the details of which yet remain to be elucidated.

Fe–S cluster enzymes HydG, HydE, and HydF provide sequential assembly of the catalytic H-cluster of [FeFe] hydrogenase.     

Nitric oxide monooxygenation (NOM) reaction of cobalt-nitrosyl {Co(NO)}8 to CoII-nitrito {CoII(NO2−)}: base induced hydrogen gas (H2) evolution

Here, we report the nitric oxide monooxygenation (NOM) reactions of a Co^III-nitrosyl complex (1, {Co-NO}⁸) in the presence of mono-oxygen reactive species, i.e., a base (OH⁻, tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH) or NaOH/15-crown-5), an oxide (O²⁻ or Na₂O/15-crown-5) and water (H₂O). The reaction of 1 with OH⁻ produces a Co^II-nitrito complex {3, (Co^II-NO₂⁻)} and hydrogen gas (H₂), via the formation of a putative N-bound Co-nitrous acid intermediate (2, {Co-NOOH}⁺). The homolytic cleavage of the O–H bond of proposed [Co-NOOH]⁺ releases H₂via a presumed Co^III-H intermediate. In another reaction, 1 generates Co^II-NO₂⁻ when reacted with O²⁻via an expected Co^I-nitro (4) intermediate. However, complex 1 is found to be unreactive towards H₂O. Mechanistic investigations using ¹⁵N-labeled-¹⁵NO and ²H-labeled-NaO²H (NaOD) evidently revealed that the N-atom in Co^II-NO₂⁻ and the H-atom in H₂ gas are derived from the nitrosyl ligand and OH⁻ moiety, respectively.

Base-induced hydrogen (H₂) gas evolution in the nitric oxide monoxygenation reaction.

As a radical species, nitric oxide (NO) has attracted great interest from the scientific community due to its major role in various physiological processes such as neurotransmission, vascular regulation, platelet disaggregation and immune responses to multiple infections.¹ Nitric oxide synthase (NOS),² and nitrite reductase (NiR)³ enzymes are involved in the biosynthesis of NO. NOSs produce NO by the oxidation of the guanidine nitrogen in l-arginine.⁴ However, in mammals and bacteria, NO₂⁻ is reduced to NO by NiRs in the presence of protons, i.e., NO₂⁻ + e⁻ + 2H⁺ → NO + H₂O.⁵ Biological dysfunctions may cause overproduction of NO, and being radical it leads to the generation of reactive nitrogen species (RNS), i.e., peroxynitrite (PN, OONO⁻)⁶ and nitrogen dioxide (˙NO₂),⁷ upon reaction with reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide (O₂˙⁻),⁸ peroxide (H₂O₂),⁹ and dioxygen (O₂).¹⁰ Hence, it is essential to maintain an optimal level of NO. In this regard, nitric oxide dioxygenases (NODs)¹¹ are available in bio-systems to convert excess NO to biologically benign nitrate (NO₃⁻).¹²NO₂⁻ + Fe^II + H⁺ ↔ NO + Fe^III + OH⁻1[M–NO]ⁿ + 2OH⁻ → [M–NO₂]⁽ⁿ⁻²⁾ + H₂O2NOD enzymes generate NO₃⁻ from NO;^11b,12−13 however, the formation of NO₂⁻ from NO is still under investigation. Clarkson and Bosolo reported NO₂⁻ formation in the reaction of Co^III-NO and O₂.¹⁴ Nam and co-workers showed the generation of Co^II-NO₂⁻ from Co^III-NO upon reaction with O₂˙⁻.¹⁵ Recently, Mondal and co-workers reported NO₂⁻ formation in the reaction of Co^II-NO with O₂.¹⁶ Apart from cobalt, the formation of Cu^II-NO₂⁻ was also observed in the reaction of Cu^I-NO and O₂.¹⁷ For metal-dioxygen adducts, i.e., Cr^III-O₂˙⁻ and Mn^IV-O₂²⁻, NOD reactions led to the generation of Cr^III-NO₂⁻ (ref. 18) and Mn^V O + NO₂⁻,¹⁹ respectively. However, the NOD reaction of Fe^III-O₂˙⁻ and Fe^III-O₂²⁻ with NO and NO⁺, respectively, generated Fe^III-NO₃⁻via Fe^IV O and ˙NO₂.²⁰ Ford suggested that the reaction of ferric-heme nitrosyl with hydroxide leads to the formation of NO₂⁻ and H⁺.¹² Lehnert and co-workers reported heme-based Fe-nitrosyl complexes²¹ showing different chemistries due to the Fe^II-NO⁺ type electronic structures. On the other hand, Bryan proposed that the one-electron reduction of NO₂⁻ to NO in ferrous heme protein is reversible (eqn (1)).²² Also, it is proposed that excess NO in biological systems is converted to NO₂⁻ and produces one equivalent of H⁺ upon reaction with ˙OH.²³ Previously reported reactivity of M–NOs of Fe²⁴ with OH⁻ suggested the formation of NO₂⁻ and one equivalent of H⁺, where H⁺ further reacts with one equivalent of OH⁻ and produces H₂O (eqn (2)).²⁵Here in this report, we explore the mechanistic aspects of nitric oxide monooxygenation (NOM) reactions of the Co^III-nitrosyl complex, [(12TMC)Co^III(NO⁻)]²⁺/{Co(NO)}⁸ (1),^15,26 bearing the 12TMC ligand (12TMC = 1,4,7,10-tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane) with mono-oxygen reactive species (O²⁻, OH⁻ and H₂O) (Scheme 1). Complex 1 reacts with the base (OH⁻, tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH)/or NaOH in the presence of 15-crown-5 as the OH⁻ source) and generates the corresponding Co^II-nitrito complex, [(12TMC)Co^II(NO₂⁻)]⁺ (3), with the evolution of hydrogen gas (H₂) via the formation of a plausible N-bound Co-nitrous acid intermediate ([Co-NOOH]⁺, 2) in CH₃CN at 273 K (Scheme 1, reaction (I)). Also, when 1 reacts with the oxide (O²⁻ or Na₂O in the presence of 15-crown-5), it generates the Co^II-nitrito complex (3) via a probable Co^I-nitro, [(12TMC)Co^I(NO₂⁻)] (4), intermediate (Scheme 1, reaction (II)); however, 1 does not react with water (Scheme 1, reaction (III)). Mechanistic investigations using ¹⁵N-labeled-¹⁵NO, D-labeled-NaOD and ¹⁸O-labelled-¹⁸OH⁻ demonstrated, unambiguously, that the N and O-atoms in the NO₂⁻ ligand of 3 resulted from NO and OH⁻ moieties; however, the H-atoms of H₂ are derived from OH⁻. To the extent of our knowledge, the present work reports the very first systematic study of Co^III-nitrosyl complex reactions with H₂O, OH⁻ and O²⁻. This new finding presents an alternative route for NO₂⁻ generation in biosystems, and also illustrates a new pathway of H₂ evolution, in addition to the reported literature.^12,27Open in a separate windowScheme 1Nitric oxide monooxygenation (NOM) reactions of cobalt-nitrosyl complex (1) in the presence of a base (OH⁻), sodium oxide (Na₂O) and water (H₂O).To further explore the chemistry of [(12TMC)Co^III(NO⁻)]²⁺ (1),^15,26 and the mechanistic insights of NOM reactions, we have reacted it with a base (OH⁻), an oxide (O²⁻), and water (H₂O). When complex 1 was reacted with TBAOH in CH₃CN, the color of complex 1 changed to light pink from dark pink. In this reaction, the characteristic absorption band of 1 (370 nm) disappears within 2 minutes (Fig. 1a; ESI, Experimental section (ES) and Fig. S1a^†), producing a Co^II-nitrito complex, [(12TMC)Co^II(NO₂⁻)]⁺ (3), with H₂ (Scheme 1, reaction (Ib)), in contrast to the previous reports on base induced NOM reactions (eqn (2)).^12,25,28 The spectral titration data confirmed that the ratio-metric equivalent of OH⁻ to 1 was 1 : 1 (ESI, Fig. S1b^†). 3 was determined to be [(12TMC)Co^II(NO₂⁻)](BF₄) based on various spectroscopic and structural characterization experiments (vide infra).^15,26bOpen in a separate windowFig. 1(a) UV-vis spectral changes of 1 (0.50 mM, black line) upon addition of OH⁻ (1 equiv.) in CH₃CN under Ar at 273 K. Black line (1) changed to red line (3) upon addition of OH⁻. Inset: IR spectra of 3-¹⁴NO₂⁻ (blue line) and 3-¹⁵NO₂⁻ (red line) in KBr. (b) ESI-MS spectra of 3. The peak at 333.2 is assigned to [(12TMC)Co^II(NO₂)]⁺ (calcd m/z 333.1). Inset: isotopic distribution pattern for 3-¹⁴NO₂⁻ (red line) and 3-¹⁵NO₂⁻ (blue line).The FT-IR spectrum of 3 showed a characteristic peak for nitrite stretching at 1271 cm⁻¹ (Co^II-14NO₂⁻) and shifted to 1245 cm⁻¹ (Co^II-15NO₂⁻) when 3 was prepared by reacting ¹⁵N-labeled NO (Co^III-15NO) with OH⁻ (Inset, Fig. 1a and Fig. S2^†). The shifting of NO₂⁻ stretching (Δ = 30 cm⁻¹) indicates that the N-atom in the NO₂⁻ ligand is derived from Co^III-15NO. The ESI-MS spectrum of 3 showed a prominent peak at m/z 333.2, [(12TMC)Co^II(¹⁴NO₂⁻)]⁺ (calcd m/z 333.2), which shifted to 334.2, [(12TMC)Co^II(¹⁵NO₂⁻)]⁺ (calcd m/z 334.2), when the reaction was performed with Co^III-15NO (Inset, Fig. 1b; ESI, Fig. S3a^†); indicating clearly that NO₂⁻ in 3 was derived from the NO moiety of 1. In addition, we have reacted 1 with Na¹⁸OH (ES and ESI^†), in order to follow the source of the second O-atom in 3-NO₂⁻. The ESI-MS spectrum of the reaction mixture, obtained by reacting 1 with Na¹⁸OH, showed a prominent peak at m/z 335.2, [(12TMC)Co^II(¹⁸ONO⁻)]⁺ (calcd m/z 335.2), (SI, Fig. S3b^†) indicating clearly that NO₂⁻ in 3 was derived from ¹⁸OH⁻. The ¹H NMR spectrum of 3 did not show any signal for aliphatic protons of the 12TMC ligand, suggesting a bivalent cobalt center (Fig. S4^†).^26b Furthermore, we have determined the magnetic moment of 3, using Evans'' method, and it was found to be 4.62 BM, suggesting a high spin Co(ii) metal center with three unpaired electrons (ESI^† and ES).²⁹ The exact conformation of 3 was provided by single-crystal X-ray crystallographic analysis (Fig. 2b, ESI, ES, Fig. S5, and Tables T1 and T2^†) and similar to that of previously reported Co^II-NO₂⁻/M^II-NO₂⁻.^15,26b Also, we have quantified the amount of nitrite (90 ± 5%), formed in the above reaction, using the Griess reagent (ESI, ES, and Fig. S6^†).Open in a separate windowFig. 2Displacement ellipsoid plot (20% probability) of 3 at 100 K. Disordered C-atoms of the TMC ring, anion and H-atoms have been removed for clarity.As is known from the literature, a metal-nitrous acid intermediate may form either by the reaction of a metal-nitrosyl with a base²⁷ or by the metal-nitrite reaction with an acid (nitrite reduction chemistry);^26b however, the products of both the reactions are different. Here, for the first time, we have explored the reaction of Co^III-nitrosyl (1) with a base. In this reaction, it is clear that the formation of Co^II-nitrito would be accomplished by the release of H₂ gas via the generation of a transient N-bound [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate (Scheme 2, reaction (II)). The formation of Co^II-NO₂⁻ (3) from the [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate is likely to proceed by either (i) homolytic cleavage of the O–H bond and release of H₂via the proposed Co^III-H transient species (Co^III-H = Co^II + 1/2H₂)³⁰ (Scheme 2, reaction (III)), as reported in previous literature where the reduced cobalt, in a number of different ligand environments, is a good H⁺ reduction catalyst and generates H₂ gas via a Co^III-H intermediate³¹ or (ii) heterolytic cleavage of the O–H bond and the formation of Co^I-NO₂⁻ + H⁺.²⁷ In the present study, we observed the formation of 3 and H₂via the plausible homolytic cleavage of the NOO–H moiety of 2 as shown in Scheme 2, in contrast to the previous reports on base-induced reactions on metal-nitrosyls (eqn (3)).²⁷ Taking together both possibilities, (i) is the most reasonable pathway for the NOM reaction of complex 1 in the presence of a base (as shown in Scheme 2, reaction (III)). And the reaction is believed to go through a Co^III-H intermediate as reported previously in Co^I-induced H⁺ reduction in different ligand frameworks and based on literature precedence, we believe that complex 1 acts in a similar manner.³¹Open in a separate windowScheme 2NOM reaction of complex 1 in the presence of OH⁻, showing the generation of Co^II-nitrito (3) and H₂via a Co(iii)-hydrido intermediate.In contrast to an O-bound Co^II-ONOH intermediate, where N–O bond homolysis of the ON-OH moiety generates H₂O₂ (Scheme 2, reaction (IV)),^26b the N-bound [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate decomposes to form NO₂⁻ and a Co(iii)-H transient species, arising from β-hydrogen transfer from the NOO–H moiety to the cobalt-center (Scheme 2, reaction (II)).^30a,c,32 The Co(iii)-hydrido species may generate H₂ gas either (a) by its transformation to the Co(ii)-nitrito complex (2) and H₂ gas as observed in the case of Co^III-H intermediate chemistry^30a,c,e−g as proposed in the chemistry of the Co^I complex with H⁺ reduction³¹ and other metal-hydrido intermediates³² and also explained in O₂ formation in PN chemistry^17,33 or (b) by the reacting with another [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate (Scheme 2, reaction (III)).Furthermore, we have confirmed the H₂ formation in the NOM reaction of 1 with OH⁻ by headspace gas mass spectrometry (Fig. 3a). Also, carrying out the reaction of 1 with NaOD leads to the formation of the [Co-(NOOD)]⁺ intermediate, which then transforms to a Co^III-D transient species. Further, as described above, the Co^III-D species releases D₂ gas, detected by headspace gas mass spectrometry (Fig. 3b), which evidently established that H₂ gas formed in the reaction of 1 with OH⁻. In this regard, we have proposed that in the first step of this reaction, the nucleophilic addition of OH⁻ to {Co-NO}⁸ generates a transient N-bound [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate that is generated by an internal electron transfer to Co^III (Scheme 2, reaction (I)). By following the mechanism proposed in the case of Co^III-H,^30a−c O₂,¹⁵ and H₂O₂(ref. 26b) formation, we have proposed the sequences of the NOM reaction of 1, which leads to the generation of Co^II-nitrito and H₂ (Scheme 2, reaction (I)–(III) and Scheme 3). In the second step, O–H bond homolytic cleavage generates a Co^III-H transient species + NO₂⁻via a β-hydrogen elimination reaction of the [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate.³² The Co^III-H intermediate may undergo the following reactions to generate H₂ gas and Co^II-nitrito either (a) by the natural decomposition of the Co^III-H transient species to generate H₂,^30a,c,e−g or (b) by the H-atom abstraction from another [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate (Scheme 3). Also, to validate our assumption that the reaction goes through a plausible N-bound [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate followed by its transformation to the Co^III-H species (vide supra), we have performed the reaction of 1 with NaOH/NaOD (in 1 : 1 ratio). In this reaction, we have observed the formation of a mixture of H₂, D₂, and HD gases, which indicates clearly that the reaction goes through the formation of Co^III-H and Co^III-D transient species via the aforementioned mechanism (Fig. 3c). This is the only example where tracking of the H atoms has confirmed the H₂ generation from an N-bound NOO–H moiety as proposed for H₂ formation from Co^III-H.³⁰Open in a separate windowFig. 3Mass spectra of formation of (a) H₂ in the reaction of 1 (5.0 mM) with NaOH (5.0 mM), (b) D₂ in the reaction of 1 (5.0 mM) with NaOD (5.0 mM), (c) D₂, HD, and H₂ in the reaction of 1 (5.0 mM) with NaOD/NaOH (1 : 1), and (d) H₂ in the reaction of 1 (5.0 mM) with NaOH in the presence of 2,4 DTBP (50 mM).Open in a separate windowScheme 3NOM reaction of complex 1 in the presence of OH⁻, showing the different steps of the reaction.While, we do not have direct spectral evidence to support the formation of the transient N-bound [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate and its decomposition to the Co^III-H transient species via β-hydrogen transfer from the NOOH moiety to the cobalt center, support for its formation comes from our finding that the reactive hydrogen species can be trapped by using 2,4-di-tert-butyl-phenol (2,4-DTBP).³⁴ In this reaction, we observed the formation of 2,4-DTBP-dimer (2,4-DTBP-D, ∼67%) as a single product (ESI, ES, and Fig. S7^†). This result can readily be explained by the H-atom abstraction reaction of 2,4-DTBP either by [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ or Co^III-H, hence generating a phenoxyl-radical and 3 with H₂ (Fig. 3d and Scheme 2, reaction (a)). Also, we have detected H₂ gas formation in this reaction (ESI,^† ES, and Fig. 3d). In the next step, two phenoxyl radicals dimerized to give 2,4-DTBP-dimer (Scheme 2c, reaction (II)). Thus, the observation of 2,4-DTBP-dimer in good yield supports the proposed reaction mechanism (Scheme 2, reaction (a) and (b)). Further, the formation of 2,4 DTBP as a single product also rules out the formation of the hydroxyl radical as observed in the case of an O-bound nitrous acid intermediate.^26bFurthermore, we have explored the NOM reactivity of 1 with Na₂O/15-crown-5 (as the O²⁻ source) and observed the formation of the Co^II-nitrito complex (3) via a plausible Co^I-nitro (4) intermediate (Scheme 1, reaction (IIa); also see the ESI^† and ES); however, 1 was found to be inert towards H₂O (Scheme 1, reaction (III); also see the ESI, ES and Fig. S8^†). The product obtained in the reaction of 1 with O²⁻ was characterized by various spectroscopic measurements.^15,26b The UV-vis absorption band of 1 (λ_max = 370 nm) disappears upon the addition of 1 equiv. of Na₂O and a new band (λ_max = 535 nm) forms, which corresponds to 3 (ESI, Fig. S9^†). The FT-IR spectrum of the isolated product of the above reaction shows a characteristic peak for Co^II-bound nitrite at 1271 cm⁻¹, which shifts to 1245 cm⁻¹ when exchanged with ¹⁵N-labeled-NO (¹⁵N¹⁶O) (ESI, ES, and Fig. S10^†), clearly indicating the generation of nitrite from the NO ligand of complex 1.^26b The ESI-MS spectrum recorded for the isolated product (vide supra) shows a prominent ion peak at m/z 333.1, and its mass and isotope distribution pattern matches with [(12-TMC)Co^II(NO₂)]⁺ (calc. m/z 333.1) (ESI, Fig. S11^†). Also, we quantified the amount of 3 (85 ± 5%) by quantifying the amount of nitrite (85 ± 5%) using the Griess reagent test (ESI, ES, and Fig. S6^†).In summary, we have demonstrated the reaction of Co^III-nitrosyl, [(12-TMC)Co^III(NO⁻)]²⁺/{CoNO}⁸ (1), with mono-oxygen reactive species (O²⁻, OH⁻ and H₂O) (Scheme 1). For the first time, we have established the clear formation of a Co^II-nitrito complex, [(12TMC)Co^II(NO₂⁻)]⁺ (3), and H₂ in the reaction of 1 with one equivalent of OH⁻via a transient N-bound [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ (2) intermediate. This [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate undergoes the O–H bond homolytic cleavage and generates a Co^III-H transient species with NO₂⁻, via a β-hydrogen elimination reaction of the [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate, which upon decomposition produces H₂ gas. This is in contrast to our previous report, where acid-induced nitrite reduction of 3 generated 1 and H₂O₂via an O-bound Co^II-ONOH intermediate.^26b Complex 1 was found to be inert towards H₂O; however, we have observed the formation of 3 when reacted with O²⁻. It is important to note that H₂ formation involves a distinctive pathway of O–H bond homolytic cleavage in the [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate, followed by the generation of the proposed Co^III-H transient species (Co^II + 1/2H₂)³⁰ prior to H₂ evolution as described in Co^I chemistry with H⁺ in many different ligand frameworks.³¹ The present study is the first-ever report where the base induced NOM reaction of Co^III-nitrosyl (1) leads to Co^II-nitrito (3) with H₂ evolution via an N-bound [Co-(NOOH)]⁺ intermediate, in contrast to the chemistry of O-bound Co^II-ONOH^26b, hence adding an entirely new mechanistic insight of base induced H₂ gas evolution and an additional pathway for NOM reactions.     

Computational Studies of Coinage Metal Anion M− + CH3X (X = F,Cl, Br,I) Reactions in Gas Phase

We characterized the stationary points along the nucleophilic substitution (S_N2), oxidative insertion (OI), halogen abstraction (XA), and proton transfer (PT) product channels of M⁻ + CH₃X (M = Cu, Ag, Au; X = F, Cl, Br, I) reactions using the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory. In general, the reaction energies follow the order of PT > XA > S_N2 > OI. The OI channel that results in oxidative insertion complex [CH₃–M–X]⁻ is most exothermic, and can be formed through a front-side attack of M on the C-X bond via a high transition state OxTS or through a S_N2-mediated halogen rearrangement path via a much lower transition state invTS. The order of OxTS > invTS is inverted when changing M⁻ to Pd, a d¹⁰ metal, because the symmetry of their HOMO orbital is different. The back-side attack S_N2 pathway proceeds via typical Walden-inversion transition state that connects to pre- and post-reaction complexes. For X = Cl/Br/I, the invS_N2-TS’s are, in general, submerged. The shape of this M⁻ + CH₃X S_N2 PES is flatter as compared to that of a main-group base like F⁻ + CH₃X, whose PES has a double-well shape. When X = Br/I, a linear halogen-bonded complex [CH₃−X∙··M]⁻ can be formed as an intermediate upon the front-side attachment of M on the halogen atom X, and it either dissociates to CH₃ + MX⁻ through halogen abstraction or bends the C-X-M angle to continue the back-side S_N2 path. Natural bond orbital analysis shows a polar covalent M−X bond is formed within oxidative insertion complex [CH₃–M–X]⁻, whereas a noncovalent M–X halogen-bond interaction exists for the [CH₃–X∙··M]⁻ complex. This work explores competing channels of the M⁻ + CH₃X reaction in the gas phase and the potential energy surface is useful in understanding the dynamic behavior of the title and analogous reactions.