Propane‐1,3‐diaminium tetrachloridozincate(II) 18‐crown‐6 clathrate

The reaction of propane‐1,3‐diamine hydrochloride, 18‐crown‐6 and zinc(II) chloride in methanol solution yields the title complex salt [systematic name: propane‐1,3‐diaminium tetrachloridozincate(II)–1,4,7,10,13,16‐hexaoxacyclooctadecane (1/1)], (C₃H₁₂N₂)[ZnCl₄]·C₁₂H₂₄O₆, with an unusual supramolecular structure. The diprotonated propane‐1,3‐diaminium cation forms an unexpected 1:1 supramolecular rotator–stator complex with the crown ether, viz. [C₃H₁₂N₂(18‐crown‐6)]²⁺, in which one of the –NH₃⁺ substituents nests in the crown and interacts through N—H...O hydrogen bonding. The other –NH₃⁺ group interacts with the [ZnCl₄]²⁻ anion via N—H...Cl hydrogen bonding, forming cation–crown–anion ribbons parallel to [010].     

Three new enanti­omerically pure ferrocenylphosphole compounds

The absolute configurations of three new enanti­omerically pure ferrocenylphosphole compounds, namely (2S,4S,S_Fc)‐4‐methoxy­methyl‐2‐[2‐(9‐thioxo‐9λ⁵‐phosphafluoren‐9‐yl)­ferro­cenyl]‐1,3‐dioxane, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₃H₂₂O₃PS)], (III), (S_Fc)‐[2‐(9‐thioxo‐9λ⁵‐phosphafluoren‐9‐yl)ferrocenyl]methanol, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₈H₁₄OPS)], (V), and (S_Fc)‐diphenyl[2‐(9‐thioxo‐9λ⁵‐phosphafluoren‐9‐yl]ferrocenylmethyl]phosphine, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₃₀H₂₃P₂)], (VIII), have been unambiguously established. All three ligands contain a planar chiral ferrocene group, bearing a dibenzo­phos­phole and either a dioxane, a methanol or a diphenyl­phosphino­methane group on the same cyclopentadienyl. In compound (V), the occurrence of O—H⋯S and C—H⋯S hydrogen bonds results in the formation of a two‐dimensional network parallel to (001). The geometry of the ferrocene frameworks agrees with related reported structures.     

A helical zinc(II) coordination polymer assembled from 1,3‐bis[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methoxy]benzene and benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylic acid

In catena‐poly[[aqua[1,3‐bis(pyridine‐3‐ylmethoxy)benzene‐κN]zinc(II)]‐μ₂‐benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylato‐κ²O¹:O⁴], [Zn(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₈H₁₆N₂O₂)(H₂O)]_n, each Zn^II centre is tetrahedrally coordinated by two O atoms of bridging carboxylate groups from two benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate anions (denoted L²⁻), one O atom from a water molecule and one N atom from a 1,3‐bis[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methoxy]benzene ligand (denoted bpmb). (Aqua)O—H...N hydrogen‐bonding interactions induce the formation of one‐dimensional helical [Zn(L)(bpmb)(H₂O)]_n chains which are interlinked through (aqua)O—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interactions, producing two‐dimensional corrugated sheets.     

CdII and CoII coordination polymers constructed from benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylic acid and 2‐(pyridin‐3‐yl)‐1H‐benzimidazole ligands

In poly[aqua(μ₃‐benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylato‐κ⁵O¹,O^1′:O¹:O⁴,O^4′)[2‐(pyridin‐3‐yl‐κN)‐1H‐benzimidazole]cadmium(II)], [Cd(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₂H₉N₃)(H₂O)]_n, (I), each Cd^II ion is seven‐coordinated by the pyridine N atom from a 2‐(pyridin‐3‐yl)benzimidazole (3‐PyBIm) ligand, five O atoms from three benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate (1,4‐bdc) ligands and one O atom from a coordinated water molecule. The complex forms an extended two‐dimensional carboxylate layer structure, which is further extended into a three‐dimensional network by hydrogen‐bonding interactions. In catena‐poly[[diaquabis[2‐(pyridin‐3‐yl‐κN)‐1H‐benzimidazole]cobalt(II)]‐μ₂‐benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylato‐κ²O¹:O⁴], [Co(C₈H₄O₄)(C₁₂H₉N₃)₂(H₂O)₂]_n, (II), each Co^II ion is six‐coordinated by two pyridine N atoms from two 3‐PyBIm ligands, two O atoms from two 1,4‐bdc ligands and two O atoms from two coordinated water molecules. The complex forms a one‐dimensional chain‐like coordination polymer and is further assembled by hydrogen‐bonding interactions to form a three‐dimensional network.     

The mixed diol–dithiol 2,2‐bis(sulfanylmethyl)propane‐1,3‐diol: characterization of key intermediates on a new synthetic pathway

A new synthetic route to 2,2‐bis(sulfanylmethyl)propane‐1,3‐diol, (II), is described starting from the commercially available 2,2‐bis(hydroxymethyl)propane‐1,3‐diol. The structures of two intermediates on this route are described. 5,5‐Dimethenyl‐2,2‐dimethyl‐1,3‐dioxane bis(thiocyanate) (systematic name: {[5‐(cyanosulfanyl)‐2,2‐dimethyl‐1,3‐dioxan‐5‐yl]sulfanyl}formonitrile), C₁₀H₁₄N₂O₂S₂, (X), crystallizes in the space group P2₁/c with no symmetry relationship between the two thiocyanate groups. There is a short intramolecular N...S contact for one thiocyanate group, while the second group is positioned such that this type of interaction is not possible. 1,3‐(Hydroxymethyl)propane‐1,3‐diyl bis(thiocyanate), C₇H₁₀N₂O₂S₂, (XI), also features a single short N...S contact in the solid state. Hydrogen bonding between two molecules of compound (XI) results in the formation of dimers in the crystal, which are then linked together by a second hydrogen‐bond interaction between the dimers. In addition, the structures of two intermediates from an unsuccessful alternative synthesis of (II) are reported. 2,2‐Bis(chloromethyl)propane‐1,3‐diol, C₅H₁₀Cl₂O₂, (VI), crystallized as an inversion twin with a minor twin fraction of 0.43 (6). It forms a zigzag structure as a result of intermolecular hydrogen bonding. The structure of 9,9‐dimethyl‐2,4,8,10‐tetraoxa‐3λ⁴‐thiaspiro[5.5]undecan‐3‐one, C₈H₁₄O₅S, (VII), shows evidence for a weak S...O contact with a distance of 3.2529 (11) Å.     

Eight 7‐benzyl‐3‐tert‐butyl‐1‐phenylpyrazolo[3,4‐d]oxazines,encompassing structures containing no intermolecular hydrogen bonds,and hydrogen‐bonded structures in one,two or three dimensions

7‐Benzyl‐3‐tert‐butyl‐1‐phenyl‐6,7‐dihydro‐1H,4H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d][1,3]oxazine, C₂₂H₂₅N₃O, (I), and 3‐tert‐butyl‐7‐(4‐methylbenzyl)‐1‐phenyl‐6,7‐dihydro‐1H,4H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d][1,3]oxazine, C₂₃H₂₇N₃O, (II), are isomorphous in the space group P2₁, and molecules are linked into chains by C—H...O hydrogen bonds. In each of 3‐tert‐butyl‐7‐(4‐methoxybenzyl)‐1‐phenyl‐6,7‐dihydro‐1H,4H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d][1,3]oxazine, C₂₃H₂₇N₃O₂, (III), which has cell dimensions rather similar to those of (I) and (II), also in P2₁, and 3‐tert‐butyl‐1‐phenyl‐7‐[4‐(trifluoromethyl)benzyl]‐6,7‐dihydro‐1H,4H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d][1,3]oxazine, C₂₃H₂₄F₃N₃O, (IV), there are no direction‐specific interactions between the molecules. In 3‐tert‐butyl‐7‐(4‐nitrobenzyl)‐1‐phenyl‐6,7‐dihydro‐1H,4H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d][1,3]oxazine, C₂₂H₂₄N₄O₃, (V), a combination of C—H...O and C—H...N hydrogen bonds links the molecules into complex sheets. There are no direction‐specific interactions between the molecules of 3‐tert‐butyl‐7‐(2,3‐dimethoxybenzyl)‐1‐phenyl‐6,7‐dihydro‐1H,4H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d][1,3]oxazine, C₂₄H₂₉N₃O₃, (VI), but a three‐dimensional framework is formed in 3‐tert‐butyl‐7‐(3,4‐methylenedioxybenzyl)‐1‐phenyl‐6,7‐dihydro‐1H,4H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d][1,3]oxazine, C₂₃H₂₅N₃O₃, (VII), by a combination of C—H...O, C—H...N and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds, while a combination of C—H...O and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds links the molecules of 3‐tert‐butyl‐1‐phenyl‐7‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxybenzyl)‐6,7‐dihydro‐1H,4H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d][1,3]oxazine, C₂₅H₃₁N₃O₄, (VIII), into complex sheets. In each compound, the oxazine ring adopts a half‐chair conformation, while the orientations of the pendent phenyl and tert‐butyl substituents relative to the pyrazolo[3,4‐d]oxazine unit are all very similar.     

Synthesis and molecular structure of Cr(salen)(μ‐N)RhCl(COD): the first example of a heterobimetallic nitride‐bridged complex containing chromium

Five‐coordinate Cr(N)(salen) {salen is 2,2′‐[ethane‐1,2‐diylbis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenolate} reacts with [RhCl(COD)]₂ (COD is 1,5‐cyclooctadiene) to yield the heterobimetallic nitride‐bridged title compound, namely chlorido‐2κCl‐[2(η⁴)‐1,5‐cyclooctadiene]{2,2′‐[ethane‐1,2‐diylbis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenolato‐1κ⁴O,N,N′,O′}‐μ‐nitrido‐1:2κ²N:N‐chromium(V)rhodium(I), [CrRh(C₁₆H₁₄N₂O₂)ClN(C₈H₁₂)]. The Cr—N bond of 1.5936 (14) Å is elongated by only 0.035 Å compared to the terminal Cr—N bond in the precursor. The nitride bridge is close to being linear [173.03 (9)°] and the Rh—N bond of 1.9594 (14) Å is very short for a monodentate nitrogen‐donor ligand, indicating significant π‐acceptor character of the Cr[triple‐bond]N group.     

Designing a heterotrinuclear CuII—NiII—CuII complex from a mononuclear CuII Schiff base precursor with dicyanamide as a coligand: synthesis,crystal structure,thermal and photoluminescence properties

Schiff bases are considered `versatile ligands' in coordination chemistry. The design of polynuclear complexes has become of interest due to their facile preparations and varied synthetic, structural and magnetic properties. The reaction of the `ligand complex' [CuL] {H₂L is 2,2′‐[propane‐1,3‐diylbis(nitrilomethanylylidene)]diphenol} with Ni(OAc)₂·4H₂O (OAc is acetate) in the presence of dicyanamide (dca) leads to the formation of bis(dicyanamido‐1κN¹)bis(dimethyl sulfoxide)‐2κO,3κO‐bis{μ‐2,2′‐[propane‐1,3‐diylbis(nitrilomethanylylidene)]diphenolato}‐1:2κ⁶O,O′:O,N,N′,O′;1:3κ⁶O,O′:O,N,N′,O′‐dicopper(II)nickel(II), [Cu₂Ni(C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₂)₂(C₂N₃)₂(C₂H₆OS)₂]. The complex shows strong absorption bands in the frequency region 2155–2269 cm⁻¹, which clearly proves the presence of terminal bonding dca groups. A single‐crystal X‐ray study revealed that two [CuL] units coordinate to an Ni^II atom through the phenolate O atoms, with double phenolate bridges between Cu^II and Ni^II atoms. Two terminal dca groups complete the distorted octahedral geometry around the central Ni^II atom. According to differential thermal analysis–thermogravimetric analysis (DTA–TGA), the title complex is stable up to 423 K and thermal decomposition starts with the release of two coordinated dimethyl sulfoxide molecules. Free H₂L exhibits photoluminescence properties originating from intraligand (π–π*) transitions and fluorescence quenching is observed on complexation of H₂L with Cu^II.     

2‐Phenyl­malonpiperadide and 2‐phenyl­malonmorpholide

The structures of 2‐phenyl­malonpiperadide [systematic name: 2‐phenyl‐1,3‐bis­(piperidin‐1‐yl)­propane‐1,3‐dione, C₁₉H₂₆N₂O₂, (I)] and 2‐phenyl­malonmorpholide [systematic name: 1,3‐dimorpholino‐2‐phenyl­propane‐1,3‐dione, C₁₇H₂₂N₂O₄, (II)], have been determined and both their molecular conformations and packing arrangements compared. Although chemically similar, compounds (I) and (II) exhibit different molecular conformations. The only general conformational similarities are that their respective carbonyl groups are orientated in the same direction and the heterocyclic rings exist in the chair arrangement. General similarities in the packing arrangements arise due to both compounds having the same space group (P2₁2₁2₁) and a similar alignment of their phenyl‐substituted backbone with respect to the c axis. Similar C—H⋯O hydrogen‐bonding associations are listed for the carbonyl O atoms, while only one of the morpholine O atoms is involved in any such association.     

Providing Support in Favor of the Existence of a PdII/PdIV Catalytic Cycle in a Heck‐Type Reaction

The complex [Pd(O,N,C‐L)(OAc)], in which L is a monoanionic pincer ligand derived from 2,6‐diacetylpyridine, reacts with 2‐iodobenzoic acid at room temperature to afford the very stable pair of Pd^IV complexes (OC‐6‐54)‐ and (OC‐6‐26)‐[Pd(O,N,C‐L)(O,C‐C₆H₄CO₂‐2)I] (1.5:1 molar ratio, at ?55 °C). These complexes and the Pd^II species [Pd(O,N,C‐L)(OX)] and [Pd(O,N,C‐L′)(NCMe)]ClO₄, (X=MeC(O) or ClO₃, L′=another monoanionic pincer ligand derived from 2,6‐diacetylpyridine), are precatalysts for the arylation of CH₂?CHR (R?CO₂Me, CO₂Et, Ph) using IC₆H₄CO₂H‐2 and AgClO₄. These catalytic reactions have been studied and a tentative mechanism is proposed. The presence of two Pd^IV complexes was detected by ESI(+)‐MS during the catalytic process. All the data obtained strongly support a Pd^II/Pd^IV catalytic cycle.     

Multicomponent crystals of erlotinib

Erlotinib [systematic name: N‐(3‐ethynylphenyl)‐6,7‐bis(2‐methoxyethoxy)quinazolin‐4‐amine], a small‐molecule epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, useful for the treatment of non‐small‐cell lung cancer, has been crystallized as erlotinib monohydrate, C₂₂H₂₃N₃O₄·H₂O, (I), the erlotinib hemioxalate salt [systematic name: 4‐amino‐N‐(3‐ethynylphenyl)‐6,7‐bis(2‐methoxyethoxy)quinazolin‐1‐ium hemioxalate], C₂₂H₂₄N₃O₄⁺·0.5C₂O₄²⁻, (II), and the cocrystal erlotinib fumaric acid hemisolvate dihydrate, C₂₂H₂₃N₃O₄·0.5C₄H₄O₄·2H₂O, (III). In (II) and (III), the oxalate anion and the fumaric acid molecule are located across inversion centres. The water molecules in (I) and (III) play an active role in hydrogen‐bonding interactions which lead to the formation of tetrameric and hexameric hydrogen‐bonded networks, while in (II) the cations and anions form a tetrameric hydrogen‐bonded network in the crystal packing. The title multicomponent crystals of erlotinib have been elucidated to study the assembly of molecules through intermolecular interactions, such as hydrogen bonds and aromatic π–π stacking.     

A dimeric heteroleptic five‐coordinate zinc(II) complex containing a non‐motionally restricted N,N′‐heterocyclic ligand

The title compound, bis(μ‐1,2‐benzene­thiol­ato)‐1:2κ³S,S′:S′;2:1κ³S,S′:S′‐bis­[(2,2′‐bi­pyridine‐κ²N,N′)­zinc(II)], [Zn₂(μ‐C₆H₄S₂)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂], crystallizes with the dinuclear mol­ecule located on a center of symmetry. The coordination geometry about the Zn atom is a modestly distorted trigonal bipyramid, with the axial ligating atoms at an angle of 170.81 (4)° and the angles in the equatorial plane in the range 112.94 (4)–129.95 (4)°. Weak π‐stacking interactions between bi­pyridine ligands on adjacent mol­ecules [interplanar spacing = 3.315 (3) Å] and a possible weak intermolecular C—H⋯S hydrogen bond (H⋯S = 2.84 Å) are seen in the crystal.     

Soft scorpionate coordination at alkali metals

Reported here are the single‐crystal X‐ray structure analyses of bis‐μ‐methanol‐κ⁴O:O‐bis{[hydrotris(3‐phenyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,3‐imidazol‐1‐yl)borato‐κ³H,S,S′](methanol‐κO)sodium(I)}, [Na₂(C₂₇H₂₂BN₆S₃)₂(CH₄O)₄] (NaTm^Ph), bis‐μ‐methanol‐κ⁴O:O‐bis{[hydrotris(3‐isopropyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,3‐imidazol‐1‐yl)borato‐κ³H,S,S′](methanol‐κO)sodium(I)}–diethyl ether–methanol (1/0.3333/0.0833), [Na₂(C₁₈H₂₈BN₆S₃)₂(CH₄O)₄]·0.3333C₄H₁₀O·0.0833CH₃OH (NaTm^iPr), and a novel anhydrous form of sodium hydrotris(methylthioimidazolyl)borate, poly[[μ‐hydrotris(3‐methyl‐2‐sulfanylidene‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐1,3‐imidazol‐1‐yl)borato]sodium(I)], [Na(C₁₂H₁₆BN₆S₃)] ([NaTm^Me]_n). NaTm^iPr and NaTm^Ph have similar dimeric molecular structures with κ³H,S,S′‐bonding, but they differ in that NaTm^Ph is crystallographically centrosymmetric (Z′ = 0.5) while NaTm^iPr contains one crystallographically centrosymmetric dimer and one dimer positioned on a general position (Z′ = 1.5). [NaTm^Me]_n is a one‐dimensional coordination polymer that extends along the a direction and which contains a hitherto unseen side‐on η²‐C=S‐to‐Na bond type. An overview of the structural preferences of alkali metal soft scorpionate complexes is presented. This analysis suggests that these thione‐based ligands will continue to be a rich source of interesting alkali metal motifs worthy of isolation and characterization.     

Molecular and polymeric uranyl and thorium hybrid materials featuring methyl substituted pyrazole dicarboxylates and heterocyclic 1,3-diketones

A series of seven novel f-element bearing hybrid materials have been prepared from either methyl substituted 3,4 and 4,5-pyrazoledicarboxylic acids, or heterocyclic 1,3- diketonate ligands using hydrothermal conditions. Compounds 1, [UO₂(C₆H₄N₂O₄)₂(H₂O)], and 3, [Th(C₆H₄N₂O₄)₄(H₂O)₅]·H₂O feature 1-Methyl-1H-pyrazole-3,4-dicarboxylate ligands (SVI-COOH 3,4), whereas 2, [UO₂(C₆H₄N₂O₄)₂(H₂O)], and 4, [Th(C₆H₅N₂O₄)(OH)(H₂O)₆]₂·2(C₆H₅N₂O₄)·3H₂O feature 1-Methyl-1H-pyrazole-4,5-dicarboxylate moieties (SVI-COOH 4,5). Compounds 5, [UO₂(C₁₃H₁₅N₄O₂)₂(H₂O)]·2H₂O and 6, [UO₂(C₁₁H₁₁N₄O₂)₂(H₂O)]·4.5H₂O feature 1,3-bis(4-N¹-methyl-pyrazolyl)propane-1,3-dione and 1,3-bis(4-N¹,3-dimethyl-pyrazolyl)propane-1,3-dione respectively, whereas the heterometallic 7, [UO₂(C₁₁H₁₁N₄O₂)₂(CuCl₂)(H₂O)]·2H₂O is formed by using 6 as a metalloligand starting material. Single crystal X-ray diffraction indicates that all coordination to either [UO₂]²⁺ or Th(IV) metal centers is through O-donation as anticipated. Room temperature, solid-state luminescence studies indicate characteristic uranyl emissive behavior for 1 and 2, whereas those for 5 and 6 are weak and poorly resolved.     

Bis­(acetato‐κ2O,O′)(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ2N,N′)mercury(II) in two differently hydrated crystal forms

Two differently hydrated crystal forms of the title compound, viz. bis­(acetato‐κ²O,O′)(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)­mercury(II), [Hg(C₂H₃O₂)₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₂)] or [HgAc₂(dmph)] [dmph is 2,3‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenantroline (neocuproine) and Ac is acetate], (I), and tris­[bis­(acetato‐κ²O,O′)(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)­mercury(II)] hexadecahydrate, [Hg(C₂H₃O₂)₂(C₁₄H₁₂N₂)]₃·16H₂O or [HgAc₂(dmph)]₃·16H₂O, (II), are presented. Both structures are composed of very simple monomeric units, which act as the building blocks of complex packing schemes stabilized by a diversity of π–π and hydrogen‐bonding interactions.     

Structure determination of a bis[4-(di-n-butylamino)phenyl](pyridin-3-yl)borane tetramer highlighting a unique geometric conformation of the core 16-membered ring

The tetramer of bis(4-di-n-butylaminophenyl)(pyridin-3-yl)borane [systematic name: 2λ⁴,4λ⁴,6λ⁴,8λ⁴-tetrabora-1,3,5,7(1,3)-tetrapyridinacyclooctaphane-1¹,3¹,5¹,7¹-tetrakis(ylium)], C₁₃₂H₁₉₂B₄N₁₂, was synthesized unexpectedly and crystallized. Its structure contains an unusual 16-membered ring core made up of four (pyridin-3-yl)borane groups. The ring adopts a conformation with pseudo-S₄ symmetry that is very different from the two other reported examples of this ring system. Density functional theory (DFT) computations indicate that the stability of the three reported ring conformations is dependent on the substituents on the B atoms, and that the pseudo-S₄ geometry observed in the bis(4-dibutylaminophenyl)(pyridin-3-yl)borane tetramer becomes significantly more stable when phenyl or 2,6-dimethylphenyl groups are attached to the boron centers.     

Magnetism and crystal structure of an N3O3‐coordinated iron(II) complex

The reaction of [FeL(MeOH)₂] {where L is the tetradentate N₂O₂‐coordinating Schiff base‐like ligand (E,E)‐diethyl 2,2′‐[1,2‐phenylenebis(nitrilomethylidyne)]bis(3‐oxobutanoate)(2−) and MeOH is methanol} with 3‐aminopyridine (3‐apy) in methanol results in the formation of the octahedral complex (3‐aminopyridine‐κN¹){(E,E)‐diethyl 2,2′‐[1,2‐phenylenebis(nitrilomethylidyne)]bis(3‐oxobutanoato)(2−)‐κ⁴O³,N,N′,O^3′}(methanol‐κO)iron(II), [Fe(C₂₀H₂₂N₂O₆)(C₅H₆N₂)(CH₄O)] or [FeL(3‐apy)(MeOH)], in which the Fe^II ion is centered in an N₃O₃ coordination environment with two different axial ligands. This is the first example of an octahedral complex of this multidentate ligand type with two different axial ligands, and the title compound can be considered as a precursor for a new class of complexes with potential spin‐crossover behavior. An infinite two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bond network is formed, involving the amine NH group, the methanol OH group and the carbonyl O atoms of the equatorial ligand. T‐dependent susceptibility measurements revealed that the complex remains in the high‐spin state over the entire temperature range investigated.     

Two bicyclic dinuclear complexes generated from 3,3′‐[1,3,4‐thiadiazole‐2,5‐diyldi(thiomethylene)]dibenzoic acid (L) and dimethylformamide (DMF): [Cu(L)(DMF)]2 and [Zn(L)(DMF)]2

A new 1,3,4‐thiadiazole bridging ligand, namely 3,3′‐[1,3,4‐thiadiazole‐2,5‐diyldi(thiomethylene)]dibenzoic acid (L), has been used to create the novel isomorphous complexes bis{μ‐3,3′‐[1,3,4‐thiadiazole‐2,5‐diyldi(thiomethylene)]dibenzoato}bis[(N,N‐dimethylformamide)copper(II)], [Cu₂(C₁₈H₁₂N₂O₄S₃)₂(C₃H₇NO)₂], (I), and bis{μ‐3,3′‐[1,3,4‐thiadiazole‐2,5‐diyldi(thiomethylene)]dibenzoato}bis[(N,N‐dimethylformamide)zinc(II)], [Zn₂(C₁₈H₁₂N₂O₄S₃)₂(C₃H₇NO)₂], (II). Both exist as centrosymmetric bicyclic dimers constructed through the syn–syn bidentate bridging mode of the carboxylate groups. The two rings share a metal–metal bond and each of the metal atoms possesses a square‐pyramidal geometry capped by the dimethylformamide molecule. The 1,3,4‐thiadiazole rings play a critical role in the formation of a π–π stacking system that expands the dimensionality of the structure from zero to one. The thermogravimetric analysis of (I) indicates decomposition of the coordinated ligands on heating. Compared with the fluorescence of L in the solid state, the fluorescence intensity of (II) is relatively enhanced with a slight redshift, while that of (I) is quenched.     

Binding H2, N2, H-, and BH3 to transition-metal sulfur sites: synthesis and properties of [RuL(PR3)(N2Me2S2)] Complexes (L=eta2-H2, H-, BH3; R=Cy, iPr)

The reactions of [Ru(N₂)(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] [‘N₂Me₂S₂’=1,2‐ethanediamine‐N,N′‐dimethyl‐N,N′‐bis(2‐benzenethiolate)(2?)] [ 1 a (R=iPr), 1 b (R=Cy)] and [μ‐N₂{Ru(N₂)(PiPr₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)}₂] ( 1 c ) with H₂, NaBH₄, and NBu₄BH₄, intended to reduce the N₂ ligands, led to substitution of N₂ and formation of the new complexes [Ru(H₂)(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] [ 2 a (R=iPr), 2 b (R=Cy)], [Ru(BH₃)(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] [ 3 a (R=iPr), 3 b (R=Cy)], and [Ru(H)(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)]^? [ 4 a (R=iPr), 4 b (R=Cy)]. The BH₃ and hydride complexes 3 a , 3 b , 4 a , and 4 b were obtained subsequently by rational synthesis from 1 a or 1 b and BH₃?THF or LiBEt₃H. The primary step in all reactions probably is the dissociation of N₂ from the N₂ complexes to give coordinatively unsaturated [Ru(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] fragments that add H₂, BH₄^?, BH₃, or H^?. All complexes were completely characterized by elemental analysis and common spectroscopic methods. The molecular structures of [Ru(H₂)(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] [ 2 a (R=iPr), 2 b (R=Cy)], [Ru(BH₃)(PiPr₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] ( 3 a ), [Li(THF)₂][Ru(H)(PiPr₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] ([Li(THF)₂]‐ 4 a ), and NBu₄[Ru(H)(PCy₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] (NBu₄‐ 4 b ) were determined by X‐ray crystal structure analysis. Measurements of the NMR relaxation time T₁ corroborated the η² bonding mode of the H₂ ligands in 2 a (T₁=35 ms) and 2 b (T₁=21 ms). The H,D coupling constants of the analogous HD complexes HD‐ 2 a (¹J(H,D)=26.0 Hz) and HD‐ 2 b (¹J(H,D)=25.9 Hz) enabled calculation of the H? D distances, which agreed with the values found by X‐ray crystal structure analysis ( 2 a : 92 pm (X‐ray) versus 98 pm (calculated), 2 b : 99 versus 98 pm). The BH₃ entities in 3 a and 3 b bind to one thiolate donor of the [Ru(PR₃)(‘N₂Me₂S₂’)] fragment and through a B‐H‐Ru bond to the Ru center. The hydride complex anions 4 a and 4 b are extremely Brønsted basic and are instantanously protonated to give the η²‐H₂ complexes 2 a and 2 b .     

Two new CoII coordination polymers with multifunctional 5‐amino‐2,4,6‐tribromoisophthalic acid and flexible isomeric bis(imidazole) ligands: preparation,crystal structure and characterization

Two new Co^II coordination polymers (CPs), namely, catena‐poly[[[(5‐amino‐2,4,6‐tribromobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κO)aquacobalt(II)]‐bis[μ‐1,3‐bis(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene‐κ²N:N′]] 4.75‐hydrate], {[Co(C₈H₂Br₃NO₄)(C₁₄H₁₄N₄)₂(H₂O)]·4.75H₂O}_n, (1), and poly[(μ‐5‐amino‐2,4,6‐tribromobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ²O¹:O³)[μ‐1,2‐bis(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene‐κ²N:N′]cobalt(II)], [Co(C₈H₂Br₃NO₄)(C₁₄H₁₄N₄)]_n, (2), have been synthesized successfully by the assembly of multifunctional 5‐amino‐2,4,6‐tribromoisophthalic acid (H₂ATBIP) and Co^II ions in the presence of the flexible isomeric bis(imidazole) ligands 1,3‐bis(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene (mbix) and 1,2‐bis(imidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene (obix). The isomeric mbix and obix ligands have a big influence on the structures of CPs (1) and (2). CP (1) is composed of chains of nanometre‐sized elliptical rings, in which the Co^II atom exhibits a distorted octahedral coordination geometry and ATBIP²⁻ acts as a monodentate ligand. Two adjacent chains are interlinked by π–π stacking interactions and hydrogen bonds, resulting in a supramolecular double chain. Hydrogen‐bonded R₈⁶(16) rings extend adjacent supramolecular double chains into a two‐dimensional supramolecular layer. Halogen bonding and a hydrogen‐bonded R₄²(8) ring further link the two‐dimensional supramolecular layers, leading to the formation of a three‐dimensional supramolecular network. The Co^II ion in CP (2) is tetracoordinated, exhibiting a distorted tetrahedral configuration. The ATBIP²⁻ ligand exhibits a bis(monodentate) coordination bridging mode, linking adjacent Co^II ions into zigzag chains, which are further bridged by the auxiliary bridging obix ligand, resulting in a two‐dimensional (4,4) topological network. Interlayer hydrogen and halogen–halogen bonding further extend the two‐dimensional layers into a three‐dimensional supramolecular network. A detailed analysis of the solid‐state UV–Vis–NIR diffuse‐reflectance spectra of (1) and (2) indicates that a wide optical band gap exists in both (1) and (2). CP (1) exhibits an irreversible dehydration–rehydration behaviour.