P2Y12受体拮抗剂定量构效关系的研究

P2Y12受体拮抗剂是一类重要的抗血小板药物,研究分子活性与其结构参数的关系,对于合成新的P2Y12受体拮抗剂具有一定指导作用.选用178个结构多样的P2Y12受体拮抗剂分子作为数据集,随机选取了143个P2Y12受体拮抗剂作为训练集,剩余分子作为检验集.采用多元线性回归(MLR)方法和主成分回归分析(PCA)方法对每个分子的636个分子参数进行线性回归分析.MLR所建模型的结果为:训练集R2=0.800,检验集R2=0.834;PCA模型结果为:训练集R2=0.545,检验集R2=0.665.相比之下MLR法所建模型具有良好的预测性和可靠性.通过模型分析,确定了影响分子活性的关键因素.以上模型对筛选和合成新型高效P2Y12受体拮抗剂提供了一定理论指导.     

Toward the identification of a reliable 3D QSAR pharmacophore model for the CCK2 receptor antagonism

The present study describes application of computational approaches to identify a validated and reliable 3D QSAR pharmacophore model for the CCK-2R antagonism through integrated ligand and structure based studies using anthranilic sulfonamide and 1,3,4-benzotriazepine based CCK-2R antagonists. The best hypothesis consisted five features viz. two aliphatic hydrophobic, one aromatic hydrophobic, one H-bond acceptor, and one ring aromatic feature with an excellent correlation for 34 training set (r2(training) = 0.83) and 58 test set compounds (r2(test) = 0.74). This model was validated through F-test and docking studies at the active site of the plausible CCK-2R where the 99% significance and well corroboration with the pharmacophore model respectively describes the model's reliability. The model also predicts well to other known clinically effective CCK-2R antagonists. Therefore, the developed model may useful in finding new scaffolds that may aid in design and develop new chemical entities (NCEs) as potent CCK-2R antagonists before their synthesis.     

SMILES as an alternative to the graph in QSAR modelling of bee toxicity

Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System (SMILES) nomenclature has been used as elucidating the molecular structure in construction of the quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) for predicting bee toxicity. On the basis of the symbols used in the SMILES notation numerical parameters have been obtained, which are simple and fast to calculate. The method has been used to develop a QSAR model to predict toxicity of pesticides on bees. Results on a heterogeneous set of pesticides are good. Statistical characteristics of this model are: n=85, R2=0.68, s=0.82, F=180 (training set); n=20, R2=0.72, s=0.68, F=46 (test set).     

Full-range optical pH sensor array based on neural networks

A neural network multivariate calibration is used to predict the pH of a solution in the full-range (0–14) from hue (H) values coming from imaging an optical pH sensor array based on 11 sensing elements with immobilized pH indicators. Different colorimetric acid-base indicators were tested for membrane preparation fulfilling the following conditions: 1) no leaching; 2) change in tonal coordinate by reaction and 3) covering the full pH range with overlapping between their pH responses. The sensor array was imaged after equilibration with a solution using a scanner working in transmission mode. Using software developed by us, the H coordinate of the colour space HSV was calculated from the RGB coordinates of each element.The neural network was trained with the calibration data set using the Levenberg–Marquardt training method. The network structure has 11 input neurons (each one matching the hue of a single element in the sensor array), 1 output (the pH approximation value) and 1 hidden layer with 10 hidden neurons. The network provides an MSE = 0.0098 in the training data, MSE = 0.0183 in the validation data and MSE = 0.0426 in the test data coming from a set of real water samples. The resulting correlation coefficient R obtained in the Pearson correlation test is R = 0.999.     

Comparative Study of Variable Selection Using Genetic Algorithm with Various Types of Chromosomes

In this study,different methods of variable selection using the multilinear step-wise regression(MLR) and support vector regression(SVR) have been compared when the performance of genetic algorithms(GAs) using various types of chromosomes is used.The first method is a GA with binary chromosome(GA-BC) and the other is a GA with a fixed-length character chromosome(GA-FCC).The overall prediction accuracy for the training set by means of 7-fold cross-validation was tested.All the regression models were evaluated by the test set.The poor prediction for the test set illustrates that the forward stepwise regression(FSR) model is easier to overfit for the training set.The results using SVR methods showed that the over-fitting could be overcome.Further,the over-fitting would be easier for the GA-BC-SVR method because too many variables fleetly induced into the model.The final optimal model was obtained with good predictive ability(R2 = 0.885,S = 0.469,Rcv2 = 0.700,Scv = 0.757,Rex2 = 0.692,Sex = 0.675) using GA-FCC-SVR method.Our investigation indicates the variable selection method using GA-FCC is the most appropriate for MLR and SVR methods.     

4D-QSAR analysis of a set of ecdysteroids and a comparison to CoMFA modeling.

The ecdysteroid-responsive Drosophila melanogaster B(II) cell line is a prototypical homologous inducible gene expression system. A training set of 71 ecdysteroids, for which the -log(EC(50)) potencies in the ecdysteroid-responsive B(II) cell line were measured, was used to construct 4D-QSAR models. Four nearly equivalent optimum 4D-QSAR models, for two modestly different alignments, were identified (Q(2) = 0.76-0.80). These four models, together with two CoMFA models, were used in consensus modeling to arrive at a three-dimensional pharmacophore. The C-2 and C-22 hydroxyls are identified as hydrogen-bond acceptor sites which enhance activity. A hydrophobic site near C-12 is consistent with increasing activity. The side-chain substituents at C-17 are predicted to adopt semiextended "active" conformations which could fit into a cylinder-shaped binding pocket lined largely with nonpolar residues for enhanced activity. A test set of 20 ecdysteroids was used to evaluate the QSAR models. Two 4D-QSAR models for one alignment were identified to be superior to the others based on having the smallest average residuals of prediction for the prediction set (0.69 and 1.13 -log[EC(50)] units). The correlation coefficients of the optimum 4D-QSAR models (R(2) = 0.87 and 0.88) are nearly the same as those of the best CoMFA model (R(2) = 0.92) determined for the same training set. However, the cross-validation correlation coefficient of the CoMFA model is less significant (Q(2) = 0.59) than those of the 4D-QSAR models (Q(2) = 0.80 and 0.80).