A Comparison of Trained and Untrained Vocalists on the Dysphonia Severity Index

The purposes of this study were (1) to compare trained and untrained singers on the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) and its component measures, and (2) to contribute to normative DSI data for trained singers. This study included 36 untrained participants (15 males and 21 females) and 30 participants (15 males and 15 females) with singing experience between the ages of 18 and 30 years. Measures of maximum phonation time (MPT), highest phonational frequency, lowest intensity, and jitter were obtained for each subject and incorporated into the previously published multivariate DSI formula. Results indicated that vocally trained subjects have significantly higher DSI scores than untrained subjects (mean DSI: 6.48 vs 4.00, respectively), with significant differences observed between trained and untrained groups for three of the four components of the DSI (F₀ high; I low; jitter). The findings of this study are consistent with previous reports that indicate significant increases in the DSI with vocal training, and with various studies that have observed increased vocal capability in trained singers versus their untrained counterparts. The results of this study indicate that alternative normative expectations for the DSI may need to be taken into account when using the DSI with patients who have participated in directed vocal training, such as choral participation and voice/singing lessons.     

Validation of the Dysphonia Severity Index in the Dr. Speech Program

PurposeThe Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) is an objective multiparameter index of voice quality that measures and describes overall voice quality. Some studies have suggested that the reliability of devices for DSI measurement should be examined. We explored the feasibility of DSI measurements using the Dr. Speech (DRS) device, verified its effectiveness for clinical voice measurements and intradevice reliability, and examined the correlation between the DSI and self-evaluations of voice problems.MethodsSeventy adult participants (including individuals with voice problems and healthy adults) underwent objective and subjective voice assessments. These data were then used to establish a DSI_DRS model and test the intradevice (DRS device and Praat software) reliability. The clinical validation of the DSI_DRS was conducted by measuring the DSI of six other participants and comparing the observed and predicted perceived voice quality as expressed by the G score (of the GRBAS scale). Moreover, the relationship between the DSI measurements and participants’ self-evaluations of voice problems was investigated by analyzing the correlation between the DSI and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI).ResultsThe DSI_DRS discriminated 80% of participants’ voice quality ratings. There were strong correlations between the DSI and variables measured by the DRS device and Praat software. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between the DSI_DRS and VHI.ConclusionThe DRS device can perform DSI measurements. Objective voice measurements and perceptual voice ratings reflected different aspects of vocal function and its effects. These factors should be considered in clinical practice settings.     

The Relationship Between Perceptual Evaluation and Objective Multiparametric Evaluation of Dysphonia Severity

SUMMARY: The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) as an objective multiparametric measurement in assessing dysphonia. The DSI was compared with the score on Grade of the GRBAS scale. Investigated was also whether the DSI is related to severity of dysphonia, which was represented by different diagnosis groups. Furthermore, it was investigated whether the DSI can differentiate between a group of patients and a control group. A total of 294 patients with different voice pathologies were included. A control group consisted of 118 volunteers without any voice complaints. The voices of all participants were perceptually evaluated on Grade, and the DSI was measured. The groups of patients with voice complaints have a lower DSI and higher scores on Grade than the control group. The DSI was significantly lower when the score on Grade was higher. The DSI discriminates between patients with nonorganic voice disorders, vocal fold mass lesions, and vocal fold paresis/paralysis. To determine whether the DSI discriminates between patients and controls, the sensitivity and specificity for different DSI cutoff points were calculated. With a DSI cutoff of 3.0, maximum sensitivity (0.72) and specificity (0.75) were found. We conclude that the DSI is a useful instrument to objectively measure the severity of dysphonia.