A fundamental study for partially defined cooperative games

The payoff of each coalition has been assumed to be known precisely in the conventional cooperative games. However, we may come across situations where some coalitional values remain unknown. This paper treats cooperative games whose coalitional values are not known completely. In the cooperative games it is assumed that some of coalitional values are known precisely but others remain unknown. Some complete games associated with such incomplete games are proposed. Solution concepts are studied in a special case where only values of the grand coalition and singleton coalitions are known. Through the investigations of solutions of complete games associated with the given incomplete game, we show a focal point solution suggested commonly from different viewpoints.     

Linear and symmetric allocation methods for partially defined cooperative games

A partially defined cooperative game is a coalition function form game in which some of the coalitional worths are not known. An application would be cost allocation of a joint project among so many players that the determination of all coalitional worths is prohibitive. This paper generalizes the concept of the Shapley value for cooperative games to the class of partially defined cooperative games. Several allocation method characterization theorems are given utilizing linearity, symmetry, formulation independence, subsidy freedom, and monotonicity properties. Whether a value exists or is unique depends crucially on the class of games under consideration. Received June 1996/Revised August 2001     

A value for continuously-many-choice cooperative games

We extend a multi-choice cooperative game to a continuously-many-choice cooperative game. The set of all continuously-many-choice cooperative games is isomorphic to the set of all cooperative fuzzy games. A continuously-many-choice cooperative game and a cooperative fuzzy game have different physical interpretations. We define a value for the continuously-many-choice cooperative game and show that the value for the continuously-many-choice cooperative game has most properties as the traditional Shapley value does. Also, we give a probabilistic interpretation for the value. The probabilistic interpretation reveals some interesting properties of the value. Finally, we discuss the uniqueness of the value.     

An average lexicographic value for cooperative games

For games with a non-empty core the Alexia value is introduced, a value which averages the lexicographic maxima of the core. It is seen that the Alexia value coincides with the Shapley value for convex games, and with the nucleolus for strongly compromise admissible games and big boss games. For simple flow games, clan games and compromise stable games an explicit expression and interpretation of the Alexia value is derived. Furthermore it is shown that the reverse Alexia value, defined by averaging the lexicographic minima of the core, coincides with the Alexia value for convex games and compromise stable games.     

A reformulated Shapley-like value for cooperative games with interval payoffs

In this paper, a new value for cooperative interval games is proposed which may remedy the disadvantages of the interval Shapley-like value and of the improved interval Shapley-like value introduced by Han et al. (2012). Moreover, it is shown that the reformulated interval value uniquely satisfies the properties of efficiency, indifference null player, symmetry, and additivity.     

具有判断值支付的合作对策的M-S值

针对联盟支付以判断值给出的n人合作对策问题,提出了一个基于1-9 判断标度的合作对策Multiplicative-Shapley 值求解公式. 首先给出了判断值平均支付函数的定义,研究了判断值的一致性及其调整方法. 其次通过定义相应的特征函数,给出了具有判断值支付的n人合作对策的优超、伪凸、伪核心、单位元等系列概念,并由此提出一个满足3条公理的Multiplicative-Shapley 值公式. 最后通过一个算例,验证了Multiplicative-Shapley 值公式的可行性和有效性.     

The Shapley value for cooperative games under precedence constraints

Cooperative games are considered where only those coalitions of players are feasible that respect a given precedence structure on the set of players. Strengthening the classical symmetry axiom, we obtain three axioms that give rise to a unique Shapley value in this model. The Shapley value is seen to reflect the expected marginal contribution of a player to a feasible random coalition, which allows us to evaluate the Shapley value nondeterministically. We show that every exact algorithm for the Shapley value requires an exponential number of operations already in the classical case and that even restriction to simple games is #P-hard in general. Furthermore, we outline how the multi-choice cooperative games of Hsiao and Raghavan can be treated in our context, which leads to a Shapley value that does not depend on pre-assigned weights. Finally, the relationship between the Shapley value and the permission value of Gilles, Owen and van den Brink is discussed. Both refer to formally similar models of cooperative games but reflect complementary interpretations of the precedence constraints and thus give rise to fundamentally different solution concepts.     

An axiomatization of the Banzhaf value for cooperative games on antimatroids

Cooperative games on antimatroids are cooperative games in which coalition formation is restricted by a combinatorial structure which generalizes permission structures. These games group several well-known families of games which have important applications in economics and politics. The current paper establishes axioms that determine the restricted Banzhaf value for cooperative games on antimatroids. The set of given axioms generalizes the axiomatizations given for the Banzhaf permission values. We also give an axomatization of the restricted Banzhaf value for the smaller class of poset antimatroids. Finally, we apply the above results to auction situations.     

A value for bi-cooperative games

Bi-cooperative games were introduced by Bilbao et al. as a generalization of TU cooperative games, in which each player can participate positively, negatively, or not at all. In this paper, we propose a definition of a share of the worth obtained by some players after they decided on their participation in the game. It turns out that the cost allocation rule does not look for a given player to her contribution at the opposite participation option to the one she chooses. The relevance of the value is discussed on several examples.     

A value for multichoice games

A multichoice game is a generalization of a cooperative TU game in which each player has several activity levels. We study the solution for these games proposed by Van Den Nouweland et al. (1995) [Van Den Nouweland, A., Potters, J., Tijs, S., Zarzuelo, J.M., 1995. Cores and related solution concepts for multi-choice games. ZOR-Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 41, 289–311]. We show that this solution applied to the discrete cost sharing model coincides with the Aumann-Shapley method proposed by Moulin (1995) [Moulin, H., 1995. On additive methods to share joint costs. The Japanese Economic Review 46, 303–332]. Also, we show that the Aumann-Shapley value for continuum games can be obtained as the limit of multichoice values for admissible convergence sequences of multichoice games. Finally, we characterize this solution by using the axioms of balanced contributions and efficiency.     

残缺模糊合作对策的加权Shapley值

针对具有模糊联盟且支付值残缺的合作对策问题,给出了E-残缺模糊对策的定义.基于残缺联盟值基数集,提出了一个同时满足对称性和线性性的w-加权Shapley值公式.通过构造模糊联盟间的边际贡献,探讨了w-加权Shapley值公式的等价表示形式,指出w-加权Shapley值与完整合作对策Shapley值的兼容性.在模糊联盟框架里,探讨了w-加权Shapley值所满足的联盟单调性、零正则性等优良性质.最后通过算例验证了该公式的有效性.     

The selectope for cooperative games

The selectope of a cooperative transferable utility game is the convex hull of the payoff vectors obtained by assigning the Harsanyi dividends of the coalitions to members determined by so-called selectors. The selectope is studied from a set-theoretic point of view, as superset of the core and of the Weber set; and from a value-theoretic point of view, as containing weighted Shapley values, random order values, and sharing values. Received May 1997/Revised version September 1999     

The least square values and the shapley value for cooperative TU games

The main result proved in this paper is the fact that any Least Square Value is the Shapley value of a game obtained from the given game by rescaling. An Average per capita formula for Least Square Values, similar to the formula for the Shapley value (Dragan (1992)), will lead to this conclusion and allow a parallel computation for these values. The potential for the Least Square Values, a potential basis relative to Least Square Values and an approach similar to the one used for the Shapley value is allowing us to solve the Inverse problem for Least Square Values.     

Monotonicity of the core and value in dynamic cooperative games

We examine behavior of the core and value of certain classes of cooperative games in which a dynamic aspect is introduced. New players are added to the games while the underlying structure is held constant. This is done by considering games that satisfy properties like convexity, or games that are derived from optimization problems in which a player's addition can be defined naturally. For such games we give conditions regarding monotonicity of the core and value.     

Partially ordered cooperative games: extended core and Shapley value

In this paper we analyze cooperative games whose characteristic function takes values in a partially ordered linear space. Thus, the classical solution concepts in cooperative game theory have to be revisited and redefined: the core concept, Shapley–Bondareva theorem and the Shapley value are extended for this class of games. The classes of standard, vector-valued and stochastic cooperative games among others are particular cases of this general theory. The research of the authors is partially supported by Spanish DGICYT grant numbers MTM2004-0909, HA2003-0121, HI2003-0189, MTM2007-67433-C02-01, P06-FQM-01366.     

A value for mixed action-set games

We extend the Aumann-Shapley value to mixed action-set games, i.e., multilevel TU games where there are simultaneously two types of players: discrete players that possess a finite number of activity levels in which they can join a coalition, and continuous players that possess a continuum of levels. Received February 1999/Final version October 2000