The 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline (aniline yellow) with 3‐nitrophthalic, 4‐nitrophthalic and 5‐nitroisophthalic acids

The structures of the anhydrous 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of the dye precursor aniline yellow [4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline], namely isomeric 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium 2‐carboxy‐6‐nitrobenzoate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₈H₄NO₆⁻, (I), and 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium 2‐carboxy‐4‐nitrobenzoate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₈H₄NO₆⁻, (II), and 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium 3‐carboxy‐5‐nitrobenzoate monohydrate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₈H₄NO₆⁻·H₂O, (III), have been determined at 130 K. In (I) the cation has longitudinal rotational disorder. All three compounds have substructures comprising backbones formed through strong head‐to‐tail carboxyl–carboxylate hydrogen‐bond interactions [graph set C(7) in (I) and (II), and C(8) in (III)]. Two‐dimensional sheet structures are formed in all three compounds by the incorporation of the 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium cations into the substructures, including, in the cases of (I) and (II), infinite H—N—H to carboxylate O—C—O group interactions [graph set C(6)], and in the case of (III), bridging through the water molecule of solvation. The peripheral alternating aromatic ring residues of both cations and anions give only weakly π‐interactive step features which lie between the sheets.     

Brucine salts of l‐α‐hydr­oxy acids: brucinium hydrogen (S)‐malate penta­hydrate and anhydrous brucinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate at 130 K

The structures of two brucinium (2,3‐dimeth­oxy‐10‐oxostrychnidinium) salts of the α‐hydr­oxy acids l ‐malic acid and l ‐tartaric acid, namely brucinium hydrogen (S)‐malate penta­hydrate, C₂₃H₂₇N₂O₄⁺·C₄H₅O₅⁻·5H₂O, (I), and anhydrous brucinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate, C₂₃H₂₇N₂O₄⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻,(II), have been determined at 130 K. Compound (I) has two brucinium cations, two hydrogen malate anions and ten water mol­ecules of solvation in the asymmetric unit, and forms an extensively hydrogen‐bonded three‐dimensional framework structure. In compound (II), the brucinium cations form the common undulating brucine sheet substructures, which accommodate parallel chains of head‐to‐tail hydrogen‐bonded tartrate anion species in the inter­stitial cavities.     

Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures in the 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of l‐tartaric acid with the associative‐group monosubstituted pyridines 3‐aminopyridine, 3‐carboxypyridine (nicotinic acid) and 2‐carboxypyridine (picolinic acid)

The 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of l ‐tartaric acid with 3‐aminopyridine [3‐aminopyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate dihydrate, C₅H₇N₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻·2H₂O, (I)], pyridine‐3‐carboxylic acid (nicotinic acid) [anhydrous 3‐carboxypyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate, C₆H₆NO₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻, (II)] and pyridine‐2‐carboxylic acid [2‐carboxypyridinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate monohydrate, C₆H₆NO₂⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻·H₂O, (III)] have been determined. In (I) and (II), there is a direct pyridinium–carboxyl N⁺—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interaction, four‐centred in (II), giving conjoint cyclic R₁²(5) associations. In contrast, the N—H...O association in (III) is with a water O‐atom acceptor, which provides links to separate tartrate anions through O_hydroxy acceptors. All three compounds have the head‐to‐tail C(7) hydrogen‐bonded chain substructures commonly associated with 1:1 proton‐transfer hydrogen tartrate salts. These chains are extended into two‐dimensional sheets which, in hydrates (I) and (III) additionally involve the solvent water molecules. Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structures are generated via crosslinking through the associative functional groups of the substituted pyridinium cations. In the sheet struture of (I), both water molecules act as donors and acceptors in interactions with separate carboxyl and hydroxy O‐atom acceptors of the primary tartrate chains, closing conjoint cyclic R₄⁴(8), R₃⁴(11) and R₃³(12) associations. Also, in (II) and (III) there are strong cation carboxyl–carboxyl O—H...O hydrogen bonds [O...O = 2.5387 (17) Å in (II) and 2.441 (3) Å in (III)], which in (II) form part of a cyclic R₂²(6) inter‐sheet association. This series of heteroaromatic Lewis base–hydrogen l ‐tartrate salts provides further examples of molecular assembly facilitated by the presence of the classical two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded hydrogen tartrate or hydrogen tartrate–water sheet substructures which are expanded into three‐dimensional frameworks via peripheral cation bifunctional substituent‐group crosslinking interactions.     

Anilinium mono­hydrogen dl‐malate

Crystals of the title salt, [(C₆H₅NH₃)]⁺·[(HOOC(CH₂)CH(OH)COO)]⁻ or C₆H₈N⁺·C₄H₅O₅⁻, are built up from protonated anilinium residues and monodissociated dl ‐malate ions. The NH₃⁺ group of the anilinium cation is ordered at room temperature. Rotation of the NH₃⁺ group along the C(aromatic)—Nsp³ bond (often observed at room temperature in other anilinium salts) is prevented by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the NH₃⁺ group and the malate anions. The anions are connected by four O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds into two‐dimensional sheets parallel to the (001) plane. The charged moieties, i.e. the anilinium cations and the sheets of hydrogen‐bonded malate anions, form two‐dimensional layers in which the phenyl rings of the anilinium residues lie perpendicular to the malate‐ion sheets. The conformation of the monodissociated malate ion in the crystal is compared with that obtained from ab initio molecular‐orbital calculations.     

l‐Cysteinium semioxalate

The title salt, C₃H₈NO₂⁺·C₂HO₄⁻, formed between l ‐cysteine and oxalic acid, was studied as part of a comparison of the structures and properties of pure amino acids and their cocrystals. The structure of the title salt is very different from that formed by oxalic acid and equivalent amounts of d ‐ and l ‐cysteine molecules. The asymmetric unit contains an l ‐cysteinium cation and a semioxalate anion. The oxalate anion is only singly deprotonated, in contrast with the double deprotonation in the crystal structure of bis(dl ‐cysteinium) oxalate. The oxalate anion is not planar. The conformation of the l ‐cysteinium cation differs from that of the neutral cysteine zwitterion in the monoclinic and orthorhombic polymorphs of l ‐cysteine, but is similar to that of the cysteinium cation in bis(dl ‐cysteinium) oxalate. The structure of the title salt can be described as a three‐dimensional framework formed by ions linked by strong O—H...O and N—H...O and weak S—H...O hydrogen bonds, with channels running along the crystallographic a axis containing the bulky –CH₂SH side chains of the cysteinium cations. The cations are only linked through hydrogen bonds via semioxalate anions. There are no direct cation–cation interactions via N—H...O hydrogen bonds between the ammonium and carboxylate groups, or via weaker S—H...S or S—H...O hydrogen bonds.     

Proton‐transfer and non‐transfer in compounds of quinoline and quinaldic acid with l‐tartaric acid

The structures of two compounds of l ‐tartaric acid with quinoline, viz. the proton‐transfer compound quinolinium hydrogen (2R,3R)‐tartrate monohydrate, C₉H₈N⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻·H₂O, (I), and the anhydrous non‐proton‐transfer adduct with quinaldic acid, bis­(quinolinium‐2‐carboxyl­ate) (2R,3R)‐tar­taric acid, 2C₁₀H₇NO₂·C₄H₆O₆, (II), have been determined at 130 K. Compound (I) has a three‐dimensional honeycomb substructure formed from head‐to‐tail hydrogen‐bonded hydrogen tartrate anions and water mol­ecules. The stacks of π‐bonded quinolinium cations are accommodated within the channels and are hydrogen bonded to it peripherally. Compound (II) has a two‐dimensional network structure based on pseudo‐centrosymmetric head‐to‐tail hydrogen‐bonded cyclic dimers comprising zwitterionic quinaldic acid species which are inter­linked by tartaric acid mol­ecules.     

Supramolecular architectures in cytosinium 6‐chloronicotinate monohydrate and 5‐bromo‐6‐methylisocytosinium hydrogen sulfate

Aminopyrimidine derivatives are biologically important as they are components of nucleic acids and drugs. The crystals of two new salts, namely cytosinium 6‐chloronicotinate monohydrate, C₄H₆N₃O⁺·C₆H₃ClNO₂⁻·H₂O, ( I ), and 5‐bromo‐6‐methylisocytosinium hydrogen sulfate (or 2‐amino‐5‐bromo‐4‐oxo‐6‐methylpyrimidinium hydrogen sulfate), C₅H₇BrN₃O⁺·HSO₄⁻, ( II ), have been prepared and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The pyrimidine ring of both compounds is protonated at the imine N atom. In hydrated salt ( I ), the primary R₂²(8) ring motif (supramolecular heterosynthon) is formed via a pair of N—H…O(carboxylate) hydrogen bonds. The cations, anions and water molecule are hydrogen bonded through N—H…O, N—H…N, O—H…O and C—H…O hydrogen bonds, forming R₂²(8), R₃²(7) and R₅⁵(21) motifs, leading to a hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular sheet structure. The supramolecular double sheet structure is formed via water–carboxylate O—H…O hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions between the anions and the cations. In salt ( II ), the hydrogen sulfate ions are linked via O—H…O hydrogen bonds to generate zigzag chains. The aminopyrimidinium cations are embedded between these zigzag chains. Each hydrogen sulfate ion bridges two cations via pairs of N—H…O hydrogen bonds and vice versa, generating two R₂²(8) ring motifs (supramolecular heterosynthon). The cations also interact with one another via halogen–halogen (Br…Br) and halogen–oxygen (Br…O) interactions.     

Proton transfer versus nontransfer in compounds of the diazo‐dye precursor 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline (aniline yellow) with strong organic acids: the 5‐sulfosalicylate and the dichroic benzenesulfonate salts,and the 1:2 adduct with 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid

The structures of two 1:1 proton‐transfer red–black dye compounds formed by reaction of aniline yellow [4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline] with 5‐sulfosalicylic acid and benzenesulfonic acid, and a 1:2 nontransfer adduct compound with 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid have been determined at either 130 or 200 K. The compounds are 2‐(4‐aminophenyl)‐1‐phenylhydrazin‐1‐ium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate methanol solvate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·CH₃OH, (I), 2‐(4‐aminophenyl)‐1‐phenylhydrazin‐1‐ium 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium bis(benzenesulfonate), 2C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·2C₆H₅O₃S⁻, (II), and 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline–3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid (1/2), C₁₂H₁₁N₃·2C₇H₄N₂O₆, (III). In compound (I), the diazenyl rather than the aniline group of aniline yellow is protonated, and this group subsequently takes part in a primary hydrogen‐bonding interaction with a sulfonate O‐atom acceptor, producing overall a three‐dimensional framework structure. A feature of the hydrogen bonding in (I) is a peripheral edge‐on cation–anion association also involving aromatic C—H...O hydrogen bonds, giving a conjoint R¹₂(6)R¹₂(7)R²₁(4) motif. In the dichroic crystals of (II), one of the two aniline yellow species in the asymmetric unit is diazenyl‐group protonated, while in the other the aniline group is protonated. Both of these groups form hydrogen bonds with sulfonate O‐atom acceptors and these, together with other associations, give a one‐dimensional chain structure. In compound (III), rather than proton transfer, there is preferential formation of a classic R²₂(8) cyclic head‐to‐head hydrogen‐bonded carboxylic acid homodimer between the two 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid molecules, which, in association with the aniline yellow molecule that is disordered across a crystallographic inversion centre, results in an overall two‐dimensional ribbon structure. This work has shown the correlation between structure and observed colour in crystalline aniline yellow compounds, illustrated graphically in the dichroic benzenesulfonate compound.     

The Formation of Organogels and Helical Nanofibers from Simple Organic Salts

Simple organic salts based on aniline‐derived cations and D ‐tartrate anions formed organogels and helical nanofibers. The organic salt (p‐fluoroanilinium)(D ‐tartrate) was found to generate an organogel despite the absence of a hydrophobic alkyl chain, whereas (p‐iodoanilinium)(D ‐tartrate) formed helical nanofibers in braided ropelike structures through a rolling‐up process. The helicity of these nanofibers could be reversed by changing the growth solvent. The driving forces responsible for the formation of the nanofibers were determined to be 1D O?H???O^? hydrogen‐bonding interactions between D ‐tartrate anions and π stacking of anilinium cations, as well as steric hindrance between the hydrogen‐bonded chains.     

Hydrogen‐bonded two‐ and three‐dimensional polymeric structures in the ammonium salts of 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid, 4‐nitrobenzoic acid and 2,4‐dichlorobenzoic acid

The structures of ammonium 3,5‐dinitrobenzoate, NH₄⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₆⁻, (I), ammonium 4‐nitrobenzoate dihydrate, NH₄⁺·C₇H₄NO₄⁻·2H₂O, (II), and ammonium 2,4‐dichlorobenzoate hemihydrate, NH₄⁺·C₇H₃Cl₂O₂⁻·0.5H₂O, (III), have been determined and their hydrogen‐bonded structures are described. All three salts form hydrogen‐bonded polymeric structures, viz. three‐dimensional in (I) and two‐dimensional in (II) and (III). With (I), a primary cation–anion cyclic association is formed [graph set R₄³(10)] through N—H...O hydrogen bonds, involving a carboxylate group with both O atoms contributing to the hydrogen bonds (denoted O,O′‐carboxylate) on one side and a carboxylate group with one O atom involved in two hydrogen bonds (denoted O‐carboxylate) on the other. Structure extension involves N—H...O hydrogen bonds to both carboxylate and nitro O‐atom acceptors. With structure (II), the primary inter‐species interactions and structure extension into layers lying parallel to (001) are through conjoined cyclic hydrogen‐bonding motifs, viz.R₄³(10) (one cation, an O,O′‐carboxylate group and two water molecules) and centrosymmetric R₄²(8) (two cations and two water molecules). The structure of (III) also has conjoined R₄³(10) and centrosymmetric R₄²(8) motifs in the layered structure but these differ in that the first motif involves one cation, an O,O′‐carboxylate group, an O‐carboxylate group and one water molecule, and the second motif involves two cations and two O‐carboxylate groups. The layers lie parallel to (100). The structures of salt hydrates (II) and (III), displaying two‐dimensional layered arrays through conjoined hydrogen‐bonded nets, provide further illustration of a previously indicated trend among ammonium salts of carboxylic acids, but the anhydrous three‐dimensional structure of (I) is inconsistent with that trend.     

Bis­(melaminium) dl‐malate tetrahydrate

The crystal structure of the title melaminium salt, bis(2,4,6‐tri­amino‐1,3,5‐triazin‐1‐ium) dl ‐malate tetrahydrate, 2C₃H₇N₆⁺·C₄H₄O₅²⁻·4H₂O, consists of singly protonated melaminium residues, dl ‐malate dianions and water mol­ecules. The melaminium residues are connected into chains by four N—H⃛N hydrogen bonds, and these chains form a stacking structure along the c axis. The dl ‐malate dianions form hydrogen‐bonded chains and, together with hydrogen‐bonded water mol­ecules, form a layer parallel to the (100) plane. The conformation of the malate ion is compared with an ab initio molecular‐orbital calculation. The oppositely charged moieties, i.e. the stacks of melaminium chains and hydrogen‐bonded dl ‐malate anions and water mol­ecules, form a three‐dimensional polymeric structure, in which N—H⃛O hydrogen bonds stabilize the stacking.     

Supra­molecular hydrogen‐bonding networks in bis­(adeninium) phthalate phthalic acid 1.45‐hydrate

In the title compound, 2C₅H₆N₅⁺·C₈H₄O₄²⁻·C₈H₆O₄·1.45H₂O, the asymmetric unit comprises two adeninium cations, two half phthalate anions with crystallographic C₂ symmetry, one neutral phthalic acid mol­ecule, and one fully occupied and one partially occupied site (0.45) for water mol­ecules. The adeninium cations form N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds with the phthalate anions. The cations also form infinite one‐dimensional polymeric ribbons via N—H⋯N inter­actions. In the crystal packing, hydrogen‐bonded columns of cations, anions and phthalate anions extend parallel to the c axis. The water mol­ecules crosslink adjacent columns into hydrogen‐bonded layers.     

l‐Leucinium perchlorate

Crystals of l ‐leucinium perchlorate, C₆H₁₄NO₂⁺·ClO₄⁻, are built up from protonated l ‐leucinium cations and perchlorate anions. l ‐Leucinium cations related by a twofold screw axis are inter­connected by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds into zigzag chains parallel to [010]. The O atoms of the perchlorate anions act as acceptors of hydrogen bonds that link the l ‐leucinium chains into separated but inter­acting two‐dimensional layers parallel to (001). Since the title compound crystallizes in a non‐centrosymmetric space group, it can be useful as a material for non‐linear optics. The efficiency of second harmonic generation is about twice that of K₂[HPO₄].     

dl‐Alaninium semi‐oxalate monohydrate

The structure of the title compound, C₃H₈NO₂⁺·C₂HO₄⁻·H₂O, is formed by two chiral counterparts (l ‐ and d ‐alaninium cations), semi‐oxalate anions and water molecules, with a 1:1:1 cation–anion–water ratio. The structure is compared with that of the previously known anhydrous dl ‐alaninium semi‐oxalate [Subha Nandhini, Krishnakumar & Natarajan (2001). Acta Cryst. E 57 , o666–o668] in order to investigate the role of water molecules in the crystal packing. The structure of the hydrate resembles that of anhydrous alaninium semi‐oxalate, with the water molecule incorporated into the general three‐dimensional network of hydrogen bonds where it forms four hydrogen bonds with neighbours disposed tetrahedrally about it. Although the main structural motifs in the hydrate and in the anhydrous form are topologically similar, the incorporation of water molecules in the network results in significant geometric distortion. There are several types of hydrogen bond in the crystal structure of the hydrate, two of which (O—H...O bonds between the semi‐oxalate anions and O—H...O hydrogen bonds between water and alaninium cations) are very short. Such hydrogen bonds between semi‐oxalate anions are also present in the anhydrous form of this compound. Short distances between semi‐oxalate anions in neighbouring chains in the hydrate alternate with longer ones, whereas in the anhydrous structure they are equidistant. Despite the similarity of these compounds, dehydration of the hydrate on storage is not of a single‐crystal to single‐crystal type, but gives a polycrystalline pseudomorph, preserving the crystal habit. This transformation proceeds through the formation of an intermediate compound, presumably a hemihydrate.     

N‐Acetyl‐l‐tyrosine methyl ester monohydrate at 293 and 123 K

The crystal structure of a protected l ‐tyrosine, namely N‐acetyl‐l ‐tyrosine methyl ester monohydrate, C₁₂H₁₅NO₄·H₂O, was determined at both 293 (2) and 123 (2) K. The structure exhibits a network of O—H...O and N—H...O hydrogen bonds, in which the water molecule plays a crucial role as an acceptor of one and a donor of two hydrogen bonds. Molecules of water and of the protected l ‐tyrosine form hydrogen‐bonded layers perpendicular to [001]. C—H...π interactions are observed in the hydrophobic regions of the structure. The structure is similar to that of N‐acetyl‐l ‐tyrosine ethyl ester monohydrate [Soriano‐García (1993). Acta Cryst. C 49 , 96–97].     

2‐Ethyl‐6‐methylpyridin‐3‐ol and its salt bis(2‐ethyl‐3‐hydroxy‐6‐methylpyridinium) succinate

The title compounds, C₈H₁₁NO, (I), and 2C₈H₁₂NO⁺·C₄H₄O₄²⁻, (II), both crystallize in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c. In the crystal structure of (I), intermolecular O—H...N hydrogen bonds combine the molecules into polymeric chains extending along the c axis. The chains are linked by C—H...π interactions between the methylene H atoms and the pyridine rings into polymeric layers parallel to the ac plane. In the crystal structure of (II), the succinate anion lies on an inversion centre. Its carboxylate groups interact with the 2‐ethyl‐3‐hydroxy‐6‐methylpyridinium cations via intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds with the pyridine ring H atoms and O—H...O hydrogen bonds with the hydroxy H atoms to form polymeric chains, which extend along the [01] direction and comprise R₄⁴(18) hydrogen‐bonded ring motifs. These chains are linked to form a three‐dimensional network through nonclassical C—H...O hydrogen bonds between the pyridine ring H atoms and the hydroxy‐group O atoms of neighbouring cations. π–π interactions between the pyridine rings and C—H...π interactions between the methylene H atoms of the succinate anion and the pyridine rings are also present in this network.     

Crystallographic characterization of the first reported crystalline form of the potent hallucinogen (R)‐2‐amino‐1‐(8‐bromobenzo[1,2‐b;5,4‐b′]difuran‐4‐yl)propane or `bromodragonfly': the 1:1 anhydrous proton‐transfer compound with 3,5‐dinitrosalicylic acid

The 1:1 proton‐transfer compound of the potent substituted amphetamine hallucinogen (R)‐2‐amino‐1‐(8‐bromobenzo[1,2‐b;5,4‐b′]difuran‐4‐yl)propane (common trivial name `bromodragonfly') with 3,5‐dinitrosalicylic acid, namely 1‐(8‐bromobenzo[1,2‐b;5,4‐b′]difuran‐4‐yl)propan‐2‐aminium 2‐carboxy‐4,6‐dinitrophenolate, C₁₃H₁₃BrNO₂⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₇⁻, forms hydrogen‐bonded cation–anion chain substructures comprising undulating head‐to‐tail anion chains formed through C(8) carboxyl–nitro O—H...O associations and incorporating the aminium groups of the cations. The intrachain cation–anion hydrogen‐bonding associations feature proximal cyclic R₃³(8) interactions involving both an N⁺—H...O_phenolate and the carboxyl–nitro O—H...O associations and aromatic π–π ring interactions [minimum ring centroid separation = 3.566 (2) Å]. A lateral hydrogen‐bonding interaction between the third aminium H atom and a carboxyl O‐atom acceptor links the chain substructures, giving a two‐dimensional sheet structure. This determination represents the first of any form of this compound and is in the (R) absolute configuration. The atypical crystal stability is attributed both to the hydrogen‐bonded chain substructures provided by the anions, which accommodate the aminium proton‐donor groups of the cations and give crosslinking, and to the presence of the cation–anion aromatic ring π–π interactions.     

Poly[tetra‐μ2‐l‐lactato‐indium(III)sodium(I)]

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, [InNa(C₃H₅O₃)₄]_n, consists of one In^III ion, one Na^I ion and four crystallographically independent l ‐lactate monoanions. The coordination of the In^III ion is composed of five carboxylate O and two hydroxy O atoms in a distorted pentagonal–bipyramidal coordination geometry. The Na^I ion is six‐coordinated by four carboxylate O atoms and two hydroxy O atoms from four l ‐lactate ligands in a distorted octahedral geometry. Each In^III ion is coordinated by four surrounding l ‐lactate ligands to form an [In(l ‐lactate)₄]⁻ unit, which is further linked by Na^I ions through Na—O bonds to give a two‐dimensional layered structure. Hydrogen bonds between the hydroxy groups and carboxylate O atoms are observed between neighbouring layers.     

Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded framework in bis(melamin‐1‐ium) naphthalene‐1,5‐disulfonate melamine pentahydrate

Crystals of the title compound, 2C₃H₇N₆⁺·C₁₀H₆O₆S₂²⁻·C₃H₆N₆·5H₂O, are built up of neutral 2,4,6‐triamino‐1,3,5‐triazine (melamine), singly protonated melaminium cations, naphthalene‐1,5‐disulfonate dianions and water molecules. Two independent anions lie across centres of inversion in the space group P. The melamine molecules are connected by N—H...N hydrogen bonds into two different one‐dimensional polymers almost parallel to the (010) plane, forming a stacking structure along the b axis. The centrosymmetric naphthalene‐1,5‐disulfonate anions interact with water molecules via O—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming layers parallel to the (001) plane. The cations and anions are connected by N—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds to form a three‐dimensional supramolecular framework.     

Hydrogen‐bonded sheets in 2‐(2‐aminophenyl)‐1H‐benzimidazol‐3‐ium dihydrogen phosphate

The title salt, C₁₃H₁₂N₃⁺·H₂PO₄⁻, contains a nonplanar 2‐(2‐aminophenyl)‐1H‐benzimidazol‐3‐ium cation and two different dihydrogen phosphate anions, both situated on twofold rotation axes in the space group C2. The anions are linked by O—H...O hydrogen bonds into chains of R₂²(8) rings. The anion chains are linked by the cations, via hydrogen‐bonding complementarities and electrostatic interactions, giving rise to a sheet structure with alternating rows of organic cations and inorganic anions. Comparison of this structure with that of the pure amine reveals that the two compounds generate characteristically different sheet structures. The anion–anion chain serves as a template for the assembly of the cations, suggesting a possible application in the design of solid‐state materials.