Synthesis and characterization of the [Ru<Subscript>3</Subscript>O(CH<Subscript>3</Subscript>COO)<Subscript>6</Subscript>(py)<Subscript>2</Subscript>(BPE)Ru(bpy)<Subscript>2</Subscript>Cl](PF<Subscript>6</Subscript>)<Subscript>2</Subscript> dimer

The polymetallic [Ru₃O(CH₃COO)₆(py)₂(BPE)Ru(bpy)₂Cl](PF₆)₂ complex (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, BPE = trans-1,2-bis(4-pyridil)ethylene and py = pyridine) was assembled by the combination of an electroactive [Ru₃O] moiety with a [Ru(bpy)₂(BPE)Cl] photoactive centre, and its structure was determined using positive ion electrospray (ESI-MS) and tandem mass (ESI-MS/MS) spectrometry. The [Ru₃O(CH₃COO)₆(py)₂(BPE)Ru(bpy)₂Cl]²⁺ doubly charged ion of m/z 732 was mass-selected and subject to 15 eV collision-induced dissociation, leading to a specific dissociation pattern, diagnostic of the complex structure. The electronic spectra display broad bands at 409, 491 and 692 nm ascribed to the [Ru(bpy)₂(BPE)] charge-transfer bands and to the [Ru₃O] internal cluster transitions. The cyclic voltammetry shows five reversible waves at −1.07 V, 0.13 V, 1.17 V, 2.91 V and −1.29 V (vs SHE) assigned to the [Ru₃O]^{−1/0/+1/+2/+3} and to the bpy^0/−1 redox processes; also a wave is observed at 0.96 V, assigned to the Ru^+2/+3 pair. Despite the conjugated BPE bridge, the electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical results indicate only a weak coupling through the π-system, and preliminary photophysical essays showed the compound decomposes under visible light irradiation.     

Ruthenium Carbonyl Cluster Complexes with Phenylgermyl Ligands from the Reactions of Ph<Subscript>3</Subscript>GeH with Ru(CO)<Subscript>5</Subscript> and Ru<Subscript>3</Subscript>(CO)<Subscript>12</Subscript>

Four new triphenylgermylruthenium carbonyl compounds HRu(CO)₄GePh₃, 14; Ru(CO)₄(GePh₃)₂, 15; Ru₂(CO)₈(GePh₃)₂, 16; and Ru₃(CO)₉(GePh₃)₃(μ-H)₃, 17 were obtained from the reaction of Ru(CO)₅ with Ph₃GeH in hexane solvent at reflux, 68 °C. The major product 14 was formed by loss of CO from the Ru(CO)₅ and an oxidative addition of the GeH bond of the Ph₃GeH to the metal atom. This six coordinate complex contains one terminal hydrido ligand. Compound 15 is formed from 14 and contains two trans-positioned GePh₃ ligands in the six coordinate complex. Compound 16 contains two Ru(CO)₄(GePh₃) fragments joined by an Ru–Ru single bond. Compound 17 contains a triangular cluster of three ruthenium atoms with three bridging hydrido ligands and one terminal GePh₃ ligand on each metal atom. When heated to 125 °C, 14 was converted to the new triruthenium compound Ru₃(CO)₁₀(μ-GePh₂)₂, 18. Compound 18 consists of a triangular tri-ruthenium cluster with two GePh₂ ligands bridging two different edges of the cluster and one bridging CO ligand. Ru₃(CO)₁₂ was found to react with Ph₃GeH at 97 °C to yield three products: 15, and two new compounds Ru₃(CO)₉(μ-GePh₂)₃, 19 and Ru₂(CO)₆(μ-GePh₂)₂(GePh₃)₂, 20 were obtained. Compound 19 is similar to 18 having a triangular tri-ruthenium cluster but has three bridging GePh₂ ligands, one on each Ru–Ru bond. Compound 20 contains only two ruthenium atoms joined by a single Ru–Ru bond that has two bridging GePh₂ ligands and a terminal GePh₃ ligand on each metal atom. All compounds were characterized by a combination of IR, ¹H NMR, single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. This report is dedicated to Professor Dieter Fenske on the occasion of his 65th birthday for his many pioneering contributions to the chemistry of metal chalcogenide cluster complexes.     

Carbon monoxide and oxygen interaction with Ru/MgF<Subscript>2</Subscript> catalyst: IR and EPR studies

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and infrared (IR) spectroscopy were used to study the formation of ruthenium and adsorbed species appearing on the catalyst upon the adsorption of CO and O₂ on 1.37 wt% Ru/MgF₂ catalysts derived from Ru₃(CO)₁₂. The presence of Ru ^x+ sites in spite of a reductive H₂ treatment at 673 K was observed by EPR and IR spectroscopy beside metallic Ru⁰ species. Both IR and EPR results provided clear evidence for the interaction between surface ruthenium and probe molecules. The IR spectra recorded after admission of CO showed a band at approx. 2000 cm⁻¹, due to linearly adsorbed CO on Ru⁰/MgF₂ and two bands at higher frequencies (approx. 2140 and approx. 2070 cm⁻¹), related to CO on oxidized Ru ⁿ⁺ species, e.g., to Ru(CO)₃ complex with Ru in the 1+ and/or 2+ state of oxidation and Ru(CO)₂ with Ru in the 3+ and/or 4+ state of oxidation. A weak anisotropic EPR signal with g _‖ = 2.017 and g _⊥ = 2.003 is due to O ₂ ⁻ radicals and a formation of Ru⁴⁺-O ₂ ⁻ complex is postulated. The Ru³⁺ appears to oxidize to Ru⁴⁺ and the resulting dioxygen anion is coordinated to the ruthenium. The strong, isotropic EPR signal at g ₀ = 2.003 detected upon admission of CO is attributed to CO radical anion rather than to any ruthenium carbonyl complexes.     

The Reactions of Two New Alkoxy-silyl Functionalized Alkynes with M<Subscript>3</Subscript>(CO)<Subscript>12</Subscript> {M = Fe,Ru} and Co<Subscript>2</Subscript>(CO)<Subscript>8</Subscript>. Spectroscopic Identification of the Products

The new alkoxysilyl-functionalized alkynes [HC≡CCH₂N(H)C(=O)N(H)(CH₂)₃Si(OEt)₃] and [HC≡C(C₆H₄)–N(H)C(=O)N(H)(CH₂)₃Si(OEt)₃] have been synthesized using literature methods. These have been reacted with Fe₃(CO)₁₂, Ru₃(CO)₁₂ and Co₂(CO)₈. With the iron carbonyl only decomposition was observed: with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ splitting of the alkynes into their parent components and formation of the complexes (μ-H)Ru₃(CO)₉[HC=N(CH₂)₃Si(OEt)₃], (μ-H)Ru₃(CO)₉[C–C(C₆H₄)NH₂] and (μ-H)₂Ru₃(CO)₉[HC–CCH₃] occurred. Finally, with Co₂(CO)₈ formation of complexes Co₂(CO)₆(HC₂R) R=(C₆H₄)NH₂, CH₂NH(CO)NH(CH₂)₃Si(OEt)₃, (C₆H₄)NH(CO)NH(CH₂)₃Si(OEt)₃ containing the intact alkynes could be obtained.     

Synthesis of stable ruthenium carbonyl complexes containing alkynols ligands and 2(diphenylphosphino)ethyl-triethoxysilane: novel complexes to anchor on mesoporous silica SBA-15 and Al2O3 surface

Abstract  

The triruthenium complexes containing alkynols ligands have been reacted with 2(diphenylphosphino)ethyl-triethoxysilane (dpts), obtaining novel chemically stable disubstituted complexes. The same disubstituted Ru complexes above described were also synthesized following another approach based on the reaction from the phosphine substituted complex Ru₃(CO)₁₀(dpts)₂ and the same alkynols ligands used to obtain the above triruthenium complexes. One of these stable complexes, the HRu₃(CO)₇[C≡C(Me)₂(OH)](dpts)₂ compound was grafted on the mesoporous silica SBA-15 and on γ-Al₂O₃ surface in order to obtain novel hybrid materials to employ in heterogeneous catalysis. The resulting materials have been characterized by multidisciplinary approach based on inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), FT-IR, XRD, physisorption measurements and DR-UV–Visible spectroscopy.     

Investigation into the formation of heteronuclear clusters of formula [{Ru<Subscript>6</Subscript>C(CO)<Subscript>16</Subscript>Ag<Subscript>2</Subscript>X}<Subscript>2</Subscript>]<Superscript>2−</Superscript> (X = Cl,Br or I)

Reaction of [Ru₆C(CO)₁₆]²⁻ with an excess of AgX (X = Cl, Br or I) affords heteronuclear clusters of formula [{Ru₆C(CO)₁₆Ag₂X}₂]²⁻ in 80% yield, which for X = I and X = Br/Cl were crystallographically characterised. The formation of the cluster was followed in solution using electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), which revealed the presence of a wide range of clusters with the general formula [{Ru₆C(CO)₁₆} _x Ag _y X _z ]^{(2x−y+z)−} where x = 1 or 2, y = 1, 2, 3 or 4 and z = 0, 1 or 2. The high yield of the product despite the evident complicated solution speciation is attributed to selective crystallisation of the observed compound driving the equilibrium toward this product.     

Molecular Engineering of Redox Rich Diruthenium Compounds: Further Investigation of Ru<Subscript>2</Subscript>(Y<Emphasis Type="Italic">ap</Emphasis>)<Subscript>4</Subscript>X Type Compounds

Three new diruthenium compounds, Ru₂(L1)₄Cl (1), Ru₂(L2)₄Cl (2) and Ru₂(ap)₄F (3) were synthesized and characterized, where L1, L2, and ap are 2-(3-methoxyanilino)pyridinate, 2-(3-propoxyanilino)pyridinate, and 2-anilinopyridinate, respectively. Structural study revealed the Ru–Ru bond lengths of 2. 2816(7) Å (1) and 2. 2785(6) Å (3). All three compounds are S = 3/2 molecules. Each of three diruthenium compounds displays two reversible one electron couples, an oxidation and a reduction, and the potential data appear to indicate that the axial fluoro ligand is a much stronger donor than the chloro ligand.     

Triruthenium complexes obtained in the thermal reaction of Ru<Subscript>3</Subscript>(CO)<Subscript>12</Subscript> with dibenzylideneacetone

The complexes Ru₂(CO)₆(μ-H)(O=C(CH=CHPh)C(H)=CPh) (5), Ru₃(CO)₈-(O=C(CH=CHPh)C(H)=CPh)₂ (6), and Ru₃(CO)₇(O=C(CH=CPh)C(H)=CPh)-(O=C(CH₂-CH₂Ph)C(H)=CPh) (7) were obtained in the reaction of Ru₃(CO)₁₂ with dibenzylideneacetone PhCH=CHCOCH=CHPh. The structures of complexes 5 and 6 were established by NMR and IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structure of complex 7 was established by X-ray diffraction. The structural and spectroscopic features of the complexes, as well as their possible formation and interconversion pathways are discussed.     

The application of pore size tunable SBA-15 molecular sieves in direct conversion of syngas to ethanol catalyzed by RhCl<Subscript>3</Subscript> and Fe(NO<Subscript>3</Subscript>)<Subscript>3</Subscript>

Four kinds of mesoporous molecular sieve SBA-15 (SBA-15-HCl, SBA-15-HPMo, SBA-15-HPW, and SBA-15-HSiW) were synthesized by different methods or materials. Loaded with RhCl₃ and Fe(NO₃)₃, the SBA-15-HPMo supported catalyst performed well in catalyzing direct conversion of syngas to ethanol.     

Multifunctional iron thiocarboxylate complexes: synthesis,reactivity and structure of CpFe(CO)<Subscript>2</Subscript>SCO-3,5-C<Subscript>6</Subscript>H<Subscript>4</Subscript>(COCl)<Subscript>2</Subscript>

A controlled substitution reaction of the chlorine atoms of 1,3,5-benzenetricarbonyl trichloride by the organoiron fragment (CpFe(CO)₂S) has been achieved. The complexes CpFe(CO)₂SCO-3,5-C₆H₃(COCl)₂ (1), 1,3-[CpFe(CO)₂SCO]₂-5-C₆H₃COCl (2) and 1,3,5-[CpFe(CO)₂SCO]₃C₆H₃ (3) were prepared from the reaction of (μ-S _x )[CpFe(CO)₂]₂ (x = 3, 4) with 1,3,5-C₆H₃(COCl)₃ in a 1:1, 2:1, or 3:1 metal to ligand molar ratio. The reactions of (1) with amines, thiols, and carboxylic acids produce the trifunctional mono-iron complexes CpFe(CO)₂SCO-3,5-C₆H₃(COY)₂ [Y = NR₂ (4), SR (5), OCOR (4)]. The X-ray structure determination of (1) is reported.     

Replacement of Fe atoms by Ru in a carbidocarbonyl cluster [Fe<Subscript>6</Subscript>C(CO)<Subscript>16</Subscript>]<Superscript>2−</Superscript>. Structures of reaction products

The reaction of the carbidocarbonyl cluster [Fe₆C(CO)₁₆]²⁻ with ruthenium(IV) hydroxochloride Ru(OH)Cl₃ was studied. At 90–100 °C, the reaction gave products of replacement of Fe atoms by Ru in the [Fe₆C(CO)₁₆]²⁻ cluster along with degradation products. Treatment of the replacement products with FeCl₃ afforded the [Fe_2.96Ru_3.04C(CO)₁₇] compound (1), which was characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis. The crystals of cluster 1 are composed of two types of octahedral molecules (1a and 1b) in a ratio of 2 : 1. Molecules 1a are in general positions, and molecules 1b are located on twofold axes. In both molecules, the Fe and Ru atoms are disordered over four of six positions. __________ Published in Russian in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 8, pp. 1761–1766, August, 2005.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dirutheniumkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Ru2(CO)n(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] (n = 4; 5) und [Ru2(CO)4(μ‐CH2)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diruthenium Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [Ru₂(CO)_n(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] (n = 4; 5) and [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] The reaction of [Ru₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₅(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 2 ) with dppm yields the dinuclear species [Ru₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). Under thermal or photolytic conditions 3 loses very easily one carbonyl ligand and affords the corresponding electronically and coordinatively unsaturated complex [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ). 4 is also obtainable by an one‐pot synthesis from [Ru₃(CO)₁₂], an excess of ^tBu₂PH and stoichiometric amounts of dppm via the formation of [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)₂] ( 1 ). 4 exhibits a Ru–Ru double bond which could be confirmed by addition of methylene to the dimetallacyclopropane [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ). The molecular structures of 3 , 4 and 5 were determined by X‐ray crystal structure analyses.     

Influence of the pore structure of MCM-41 and SBA-15 silica fibers on atomic layer chemical vapor deposition of cobalt carbonyl

Mesoporous high surface area MCM-41 and SBA-15 type silica materials with fibrous morphology were synthesized and used as support materials for the ALCVD (atomic layer chemical vapor deposition) preparation of Co/MCM-41 and Co/SBA-15 catalysts. Co/MCM-41 and Co/SBA-15 catalysts were prepared by deposition of Co2(CO)8 from the gas phase onto the surfaces of preheated support materials in a fluidized bed reactor. For both silica materials, two different kinds of preparation methods, direct deposition and a pulse deposition method, were used. Pure silica supports as well as supported cobalt catalysts were characterized by various spectroscopic (IR) and analytical (X-ray diffraction, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller, elemental analysis) methods. MCM-41 and SBA-15 fibers showed considerable ability to adsorb Co2(CO)8 from the gas phase. For MCM-41 and SBA-15 silicas, cobalt loadings of 13.7 and 12.1 wt % were obtained using the direct deposition method. The cobalt loadings increased to 23.0 and 20.7 wt % for MCM-41 and SBA-15 silicas, respectively, when the pulse deposition method was used. The reduction behavior of silica-supported cobalt catalysts was found to depend on the catalyst preparation method and on the mesoporous structure of the support material. Almost identical reduction properties of SBA-15-supported catalysts prepared by different deposition methods are explained by the structural properties of the mesoporous support and, in particular, by the chemical structure of the inner surfaces and walls of the mesopores. Pulse O2/H2 chemisorption experiments showed catalytically promising redox properties and surface stability of the prepared MCM-41- and SBA-15-supported cobalt catalysts.     

Synthesis,characterization and olefin hydroformylation reactions of <Emphasis Type="Italic">mer</Emphasis>-[Mo(CO)<Subscript>3</Subscript>(p-C<Subscript>5</Subscript>H<Subscript>4</Subscript>N-CN)<Subscript>3</Subscript>]

Mer-[Mo(CO)₃(p-C₅H₄N-CN)₃] was prepared by UV-irradiation of a THF solution of Mo(CO)₆ and para-cyanopyridine under heating. The complex was characterized by FT-IR, MS, ¹H and ¹³C NMR and showed catalytic activity for olefin hydroformylation (1-hexene, cyclohexene and 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene as model olefins; 600 psi synthesis gas (pCO/pH₂ = 1); 100 °C; 24 h; toluene). An examination of the complex catalyzed hydroformylation of a real naphtha cut (El Palito refinery, Venezuela), under the same conditions, also showed activity in the conversion to oxygenated products.     

Mesoporous materials incorporating a zinc(II) complex: Synthesis and direct luminescence quantum yield determination

New luminescent inorganic–organic hybrid materials incorporating the luminescent zinc(II) complex ZnL₂ (λ_em = 457 nm and Φ_em = 4.4% reference values for ZnL₂; HL = chelating ligand resulting from the reaction between salicylaldehyde and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane), covalently bonded to different types of mesoporous silica hosts (namely MCM-41, MCM-48 and SBA-15), were prepared via both the methods of grafting post-synthesis (GPS) and one-pot synthesis (OPS). The products obtained, which form the GPS [(GPS)(Zn/MCM-41), (GPS)(Zn/MCM-48), (GPS)(Zn/SBA-15)] and the OPS [(OPS)(Zn/MCM-41), (OPS)(Zn/MCM-48), (OPS)(Zn/SBA-15)] series, contain the ZnL₂ guest covalently bonded to the silica framework through silicon–oxygen bonds formed when the silane group is placed at the periphery of the Zn(II) coordination sphere. GPS and OPS materials were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, N₂ adsorption/desorption, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and UV/vis spectroscopy. For the new mesoporous materials the emission quantum yield (EQY) was measured by means of an integrating sphere combined with a spectrofluorimeter. The ZnL₂ loading (measured by the ZnL₂/SiO₂ ratio calculated from TGA data) for MCM-41 appears to be independent of the synthesis procedure, whereas, for both MCM-48 and SBA-15, the ZnL₂/SiO₂ ratio of the materials obtained via OPS is about four times higher than products obtained from GPS. The ZnL₂ loaded GPS and OPS series show λ_em maxima at about 485 and 455 nm, respectively. Moreover, with reference to EQY (GPS)(Zn/SBA-15) and (OPS)(Zn/SBA-15), although featuring ZnL₂/SiO₂ ratios of 0.13 and 0.45, respectively, they showed similar EQY values: 2% and 5%. On the contrary, (GPS)(Zn/MCM-41) and (OPS)(Zn/MCM-41) which give similar ZnL₂/SiO₂ ratios (0.09 and 0.14) exhibit very different EQY, i.e. 2% and 22%, respectively.     

Aktivierung von Schwefelkohlenstoff an Trirutheniumclustern: Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [Ru3(CO)5(μ‐H)2(μ‐PCy2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2){μ‐η2‐PCy2C(S)}(μ3‐S)] und [Ru3(CO)5(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐PCy2)2(μ3‐S)]

Activation of Carbon Disulfide on Triruthenium Clusters: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structure Analysis of [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] and [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] [Ru₃(CO)₆(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) reacts under mild conditions with CS₂ and yields by oxidative decarbonylation and insertion of CS into one phosphido bridge the opened 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐dppm){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] ( 2 ) with only two M–M bonds. The compound 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; α = 84.65(3), β = 77.21(3), γ = 81.87(3)° and V = 2790.7(11) ų. The reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₇(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂] ( 3 ) with CS₂ in refluxing toluene affords the 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] ( 4 ). The compound cristallizes in the monoclinic space group P 2₁/a with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; β = 104.223(16)° and V = 4570.9(10) ų. Although in the solid state structure one elongated Ru–Ru bond has been found the complex 4 can be considered by means of the ³¹P‐NMR data as an electron‐rich metal cluster.     

The Synthesis and Characterization of Ru<Subscript>2</Subscript>(DMBA-X)<Subscript>4</Subscript>Cl<Subscript>2</Subscript> with X as Br and I

New N,N′-dimethylbenzamidine ligands bearing para-Br (HDMBA-Br) and para-I (HDMBA-I) substituents were prepared and crystallographically characterized. The ligand exchange reaction between Ru₂(OAc)₄Cl and HDMBA-X (X = Br and I) afforded the new Ru₂(III) compounds, namely Ru₂(DMBA-X)₄Cl₂, in excellent yields. These new compounds were also characterized with cyclic voltammetric and single crystal X-ray diffraction techniques. Dedicated to the memory of Professor F. A. Cotton.     

Theoretical study on homoleptic mononuclear and binuclear ruthenium carbonyls Ru(CO)n (n= 3–5) and Ru2(CO)n (n = 8, 9)

Homoleptic mononuclear and binuclear ruthenium carbonyls Ru(CO) _n (n = 3–5) and Ru₂(CO) _n (n = 8,9) have been investigated using density functional theory. Sixteen isomers are obtained. For Ru(CO)₅, the lowest-energy structure is the singlet D _3h trigonal bipyramid. Similar to Os(CO)₅, the distorted square pyramid isomer with C _2v symmetry lies ∼7 kJ·mol⁻¹ higher in energy. For the unsaturated mononuclear ruthenium carbonyls Ru(CO)₄ and Ru(CO)₃, a singlet structure with C _2v symmetry and a C _s bent T-shaped structure are the lowest-energy structures, respectively. The global minimum for the Ru₂(CO)₉ is a singly bridged (CO)₄Ru(μ-CO)Ru(CO)₄ structure. A triply bridged Ru₂(CO)₆(μ-CO)₃ structure analogous to the known Fe₂(CO)₉ structure is predicted to lie very close in energy to the global minimum. For Ru₂(CO)₈, the doubly bridged C ₂ structure is predicted to be the global minimum. For the lowest-energy structures of M₂(CO) _n (M = Fe, Ru, Os, n = 9,8), it is found that both iron and ruthenium are favored to form structures containing more bridging carbonyl groups, while osmium prefers to have structures with less bridging carbonyl groups. The study of dissociation energy shows that the dissociation of Ru₂(CO)₉ into the mononuclear fragments Ru(CO)₅ + Ru(CO)₄ is a less energetically demanding process than the dissociation of one carbonyl group from Ru₂(CO)₉ to give Ru₂(CO)₈.     

Reactions of trans-[RuCl2(CO)2(PEt3)2] with 1,1-dithiolates: Stepwise formation of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt3)(S2X)] (X = CNMe2, CNEt2, COEt,P(OEt)2, PPh2)

Trans-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PEt₃)₂] reacts with two equivalents of a series of 1,1-dithiolate ligands to form the bis(dithiolate) complexes, cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂X)₂] (X = CNMe₂, CNEt₂, COEt, P(OEt)₂, PPh₂). Two intermediates have been isolated; trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂Cl(CO){S₂P(OEt)₂}] and trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂(CO)(η¹-S₂COEt)(η²-S₂COEt)], allowing a simple reaction scheme to be postulated involving three steps; (i) initial replacement of cis carbonyl and chloride ligands, (ii) substitution of the second chloride, (iii) loss of a phosphine. Thermolysis of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂CNMe₂)₂] with Ru₃(CO)₁₂ in xylene affords trinuclear [Ru₃(μ₃-S)₂(PEt₃)(CO)₈] as a result of dithiocarbamate degradation. Crystal structures of cis-[Ru(CO)(PEt₃)(S₂X)₂] (X = NMe₂, COEt), trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂Cl(CO){S₂P(OEt)₂}], trans-[Ru(PEt₃)₂(CO)(η¹-S₂COEt)(η²-S₂COEt)] and [Ru₃(μ₃-S)₂(PEt₃)(CO)₈] are reported.     

Investigation of Mg modified mesoporous silicas and their CO2 adsorption capacities

CO₂ adsorption properties on Mg modified silica mesoporous materials were investigated. By using the methods of co-condensation, dispersion and ion-exchange, Mg²⁺ was introduced into SBA-15 and MCM-41, and transformed into MgO in the calcination process. The basic MgO can provide active sites to enhance the acidic CO₂ adsorption capacity. To improve the amount and the dispersion state of the loading MgO, the optimized modification conditions were also investigated. The XRD and TEM characteristic results, as well as the CO₂ adsorption performance showed that the CO₂ adsorption capacity not only depended on the pore structures of MCM-41 and SBA-15, but also on the improvement of the dispersion state of MgO by modification. Among various Mg modified silica mesoporous materials, the CO₂ adsorption capacity increased from 0.42 mmol g⁻¹ of pure silica SBA-15 to 1.35 mmol g⁻¹ of Mg–Al–SBA-15-I1 by the ion-exchange method enhanced with Al³⁺ synergism. Moreover, it also increased from 0.67 mmol g⁻¹ of pure silica MCM-41 to 1.32 mmol g⁻¹ of Mg–EDA–MCM-41-D10 by the dispersion method enhanced with the incorporation of ethane diamine. The stability test by 10 CO₂ adsorption/desorption cycles showed Mg–urea–MCM-41-D10 possessed quite good recyclability.