Evaluation of tris(4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthrolinedisulfonate)ruthenium(II) as a chemiluminescence reagent

Previous studies have suggested that tris(4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthrolinedisulfonate)ruthenium(II) (Ru(BPS)₃⁴⁻) has great potential as a chemiluminescence reagent in acidic aqueous solution. We have evaluated four different samples of this reagent (two commercially available and two synthesised in our laboratory) in comparison with tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) (Ru(bipy)₃²⁺) and tris(1,10-phenanthroline)ruthenium(II) (Ru(phen)₃²⁺), using a range of structurally diverse analytes. In general, Ru(BPS)₃⁴⁻ produced more intense chemiluminescence, but the oxidised Ru(BPS)₃³⁻ species is less stable in aqueous solution than Ru(bipy)₃³⁺ and produced a greater blank signal than Ru(bipy)₃³⁺ or Ru(phen)₃³⁺, which had a detrimental effect on sensitivity. Although the complex is often depicted with the sulfonate groups of the BPS ligand in the para position on the phenyl rings, NMR characterisation revealed that the commercially available BPS material used in this study was predominantly the meta isomer.     

Comparison of homoleptic and heteroleptic 2,2′-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline ruthenium complexes as chemiluminescence and electrochemiluminescence reagents in aqueous solution

We have conducted a comprehensive comparative study of Ru(bipy)₃²⁺, Ru(bipy)₂(phen)²⁺, Ru(bipy)(phen)₂²⁺, and Ru(phen)₃²⁺ as chemiluminescence and electrochemiluminescence (ECL) reagents, to address several previous conflicting observations and gain a greater insight into their potential for chemical analysis. Clear trends were observed in many of their spectroscopic and electrochemical properties, but the relative chemiluminescence or ECL intensity with a range of analytes/co-reactants is complicated by the contribution of numerous (sometimes opposing) factors. Significantly, the reversibility of cyclic voltammetric responses for the complexes decreased as the number of phenanthroline ligands was increased, due to the lower stability of their ruthenium(III) form in the aqueous solvent. This trend was also evident over a longer timescale when the ruthenium(III) form was spectrophotometrically monitored after chemical oxidation of the ruthenium(II) complexes. In general, the greater stability of Ru(bipy)₃³⁺ resulted in lower blank signals, although this effect was less pronounced with ECL, where the reagent is oxidised in the presence of the co-reactants. Nevertheless, this shows the need to compare signal-to-blank ratios or detection limits, rather than the more common comparisons of overall signal intensity for different ruthenium complexes. Furthermore, our results support previous observations that, compared to Ru(bipy)₃²⁺, Ru(phen)₃²⁺ provides greater ECL and chemiluminescence intensities with oxalate, which in some circumstances translates to superior detection limits, but they do not support the subsequent generalised notion that Ru(phen)₃²⁺ is a more sensitive reagent than Ru(bipy)₃²⁺ for all analytes.     

Ruthenium(II) mediated C-H activation of substituted acetophenone thiosemicarbazones: Synthesis, structural characterization, luminescence and electrochemical properties

Treatment of [RuHCl(CO)(AsPh₃)₃] with 4′-substituted acetophenone thiosemicarbazone derivatives in methanol under reflux afford a series of air stable new ruthenium(II) cyclometalated complexes containing thiosemicarbazone of general formula [Ru(L)(CO)(AsPh₃)₂]. The 4′-substituted acetophenone thiosemicarbazone ligands behave as a dianionic terdentate C, N and S donors (L) and coordinates to ruthenium via aromatic carbon, the imine nitrogen and thiol sulfur. The compositions of the complexes have been established by elemental analysis, and spectral methods (FT-IR, UV-Vis, ¹H NMR, ESI-MS) and X-ray crystallography. In chloroform solution all the complexes exhibit metal-to-ligand charge transfer transitions (MLCT) in the visible region and are emissive at room temperature with quantum yield of 0.001-0.005. The crystal structure of one of the complexes [Ru(4CAP-PTSC)(CO)(AsPh₃)₂] (4) has been solved by single crystal X-ray crystallography and it indicates the presence of a distorted octahedral geometry in these complexes. All the complexes exhibit a quasi reversible one electron reduction (Ru^II/Ru^I) in the range −0.83 to −0.86 V. The formal potential of all the couples correlate linearly with the Hammett constant of the para substituent in phenyl fragment of the acetophenone thiosemicarbazone ligands.     

Ruthenium (II) polypyridyl complexes based on bipyridine and two novel diimine ligands with carrier-transporting unit: synthesis, photoluminescence and redox properties

A series of ruthenium (II) complexes, [Ru(bpy)₂L]X₂ (L = L1, L2; X = Cl⁻, PF₆⁻, SCN⁻), were synthesized based on bipyridine and two novel diimine ligands L1 and L2 (L1 = 1-(4-5′-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazolylphenyl)-2-pyridinyl-benzoimidazole, L2 = 1-(4-carbazolylphenyl)-2-pyridinylbenzimidazole); and the crystal structure of [Ru(bpy)₂L1]Cl₂ was also described. [Ru(bpy)₂(Pybm)]X₂ (Pybm = 2-(2-pyridine)benzimidazole) complexes were also prepared as reference samples. In the UV-vis absorption spectra there are one strong π → π* transition and two dπ (Ru) → π* transitions. By comparisons of photoluminescence properties between [Ru(bpy)₂L]X (L = L1, L2) and the reference complexes we find that the complexes with carrier-transporting groups of carbazole and oxadizole have the higher emission intensity and quantum efficiency. One reversible oxidation process in the range 0.80-1.00 V exists in each of the complexes which is assigned to the metal oxidation, [Ru(III)(bpy)₂L]²⁺ + e⁻?[Ru(II)(bpy)₂L]⁺.     

Synthesis, characterization and cyclic voltammetric studies of ruthenium oximates

Summary Using 1,2-naphthoquinone-1-oxime (HL) as the principal ligand, four mixed-ligand ruthenium oximate complexes - namely [Ru(bipy)₂(L)]ClO₄, [Ru(pap)₂(L)]-ClO₄, [Ru(bipy)(L)₂] and [Ru(PPh₃)₂(L)₂], where bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine and pap = 2-(phenylazo)pyridine- have been synthesized and characterized. In all these complexes, Ru exists in the +2 state. They are diamagnetic and, in solution, show several intense metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transitions in the vis. region. In MeCN solution, all four complexes show a reversible Ru^II-Ru^III oxidation on the positive side of a standard calomel electrode (s.c.e.), the potential of which varies with the compositions of the complexes. Reductions of the coordinated co-ligands (bipy or pap) are also observed.     

Star-shaped electrochemiluminescent metallodendrimers with central polypyridyl Ru(II) complexes: Synthesis and their photophysical and electrochemical properties

Several dendritic bridging ligands were designed and synthesized to develop more sensitive and efficient electrochemiluminescent (ECL) polynuclear Ru(II) complexes. Various types of novel two-armed, four-armed and six-armed tris(bipyridyl)ruthenium core dendrimers were synthesized by coordinating dendritic polybipyridyl ligands with Ru(II) complexes, and the effect of the ligand and the dendritic network on the ECL characteristics were studied. Their electrochemical redox potentials, UV, photoluminescence (PL), and relative ECL intensities were also investigated in detail. The synthesized metallodendrimers exhibited strong metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) absorption at 428-451 nm and emission at 591-601 nm. Most of the newly synthesized metallodendrimers showed enhanced ECL intensities compared to the reference complex, [Ru(o-phen)₃](PF₆)₂. In particular, the ECL intensities of the six-armed heptanuclear ruthenium complexes were almost four times greater than that of [Ru(o-phen)₃]²⁺. These metallodendrimers could be utilized as efficient ECL materials and light emitting devices.     

A surface enhanced Raman study of the adsorption of tris(2,2-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) and substituted analogues on chemically-deposited silver films

The surface enhanced resonance Raman spectroscopy (SERRS) of a series of tris(2,2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) complexes on chemically produced silver films is reported. The SERR spectra of [Ru(bipy)₃]²⁺, several tris complexes of Ru(II) containing substituted 2,2′-bipyridine (4,4′-dimethyl-,4,4′diphenyl-, 4,4′-diamino- and 4,4′-diethylcarboxylate-2,2′-bipyridine) ligands and the neutral cis-bis complexes [Ru(bipy)₂(NCS)₂] and [Ru(bipy)₂Cl₂] show very high band intensities. The large enhancement arises from the combination of the inherent resonance Raman effect and the surface plasmon resonance (due to the rough nature of the silver film). The molecules are not chemisorbed on the silver surface and hence the enhancement occurs solely via the electromagnetic mechanism. Ale SERR spectra are virtually free of the fluorescence which dominates the corresponding RR spectra thus illustrating the use of SERRS in the vibrational spectroscopy of strongly luminescing species. The SERRS spectra of the substituted 2,2′-bipyridine complexes are discussed.     

Ruthenium(III) complexes with N-(acetyl)-N′-(5-R-salicylidene)hydrazines: Syntheses,structures and properties

The reactions of 1 mol equiv. each of [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] and N-(acetyl)-N′-(5-R-salicylidene)hydrazines (H₂ahsR, R = H, OCH₃, Cl, Br and NO₂) in alcoholic media afford simultaneously two types of complexes having the general formulae [Ru(HahsR)(PPh₃)₂Cl₂] and [Ru(ahsR)(PPh₃)₂Cl]. The complexes have been characterized by elemental analysis, magnetic, spectroscopic and electrochemical measurements. Molecular structures of [Ru(HahsH)(PPh₃)₂Cl₂] and [Ru(ahsH)(PPh₃)₂Cl] have been confirmed by X-ray crystallography. In both species, the PPh₃ ligands are trans to each other. The bidentate HahsH⁻ coordinates to the metal ion via the O atom of the deprotonated amide and the imine–N atom in [Ru(HahsH)(PPh₃)₂Cl₂]. In HahsH⁻, the phenolic OH is involved in a strong intramolecular hydrogen bond with the uncoordinated amide N atom forming a seven-membered ring. In [Ru(ahsH)(PPh₃)₂Cl], the tridentate ahsH²⁻ binds to the metal ion via the deprotonated amide O, the imine N and the phenolate O atoms. In the electronic spectra, the green [Ru(HahsR)(PPh₃)₂Cl₂] and brown [Ru(ahsR)(PPh₃)₂Cl] complexes display several absorptions in the ranges 385–283 and 457–269 nm, respectively. Both complexes are low-spin and display rhombic EPR spectra in frozen solutions. Both types of complexes are redox active and display a quasi-reversible ruthenium(III) to ruthenium(II) reduction which is sensitive to the polar effect of the substituent on the chelating ligand. The reduction potentials are in the ranges −0.21 to −0.12 and −0.42 to −0.21 V (versus Ag/AgCl) for [Ru(HahsR)(PPh₃)₂Cl₂] and [Ru(ahsR)(PPh₃)₂Cl], respectively.     

Synthesis,characterization and cyclic voltammetric studies of monopicolinate complexes of ruthenium(II)

Summary Two stable monopicolinate complexes of ruthenium(II), [Ru(bipy)₂(pic)]ClO₄ and [Ru(pap)₂(pic)]ClO₄ [bipy = 2,2-bipyridine, pic = picolinate anion, pap = 2-(phenylazo)-pyridine], were prepared and characterized. The complexes are diamagnetic and behave as 1:1 electrolytes in MeCN solution. In the i.r. spectra, they show characteristic vibrations of bipy or pap, pic and ClO _inf4 ^p– . In MeCN solution, both complexes display three intense absorption bands in the visible region, which have been assigned to metal-to-ligand charge-transfer transitions. Each complex shows a reversible ruthenium(II)-ruthenium(III) oxidation in MeCN, the formal potential (E _inf298 ^p0 ) being 0.75 V versus a saturated calomel reference electrode (SCE) for [Ru-(bipy)₂(pic)]⁺ and 1.44 V versus SCE for [Ru(pap)₂(pic)]⁺. Multiple reductions of the coordinated bipy and pap ligands have also been observed.Author to whom all correspondence should be directed.     

Ru(η-1,3,5-cyclooctatriene)(η-dimethyl fumarate)2: a novel, versatile zerovalent ruthenium complex with electron-deficient olefinic ligands

The reactivity of a novel zerovalent ruthenium complex, Ru(η⁶-cot)(η²-dmfm)₂ (cot = 1,3,5-cyclooctatriene, dmfm, =dimethyl fumarate), which is readily prepared from Ru(η⁴-cod)(η⁶-cot) (cod = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) and dmfm was examined. The reaction with monodentate phosphine or amine ligands gave Ru(η⁶-cot)(dmfm)(L) (L = ligand) via dissociation of dmfm. Among bidentate phosphines, dppm (dppm = bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) reacted to give Ru(η⁴-cot)(dmfm)(dppm) along with releasing a dmfm ligand. In the case of dppe (dppe = 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane), two types of complexes were obtained depending on the reaction conditions, Ru(dmfm)(dppe)₂ and an alkyl alkenyl complex; in the formation of the latter complex, sp² C-H bond activation of dmfm occurred. Ru(η⁴-cot)(dmfm)(N^?N) and Ru(dmfm)₂ (N^?N^?N) were formed by reacting with bidentate and tridentate nitrogen ligands. The reactions with arenes gave π-coordinated complexes, Ru(η⁶-arene)(dmfm)₂. p-Quinones and a p-biqunone reacted to give Ru(η⁶-cot)(p-quinone) and {Ru(η⁶-cot)}₂(p-biquinone), respectively, along with the dissociation of two dmfm ligands. It was found that low-valent ruthenium complexes preferably bear both electron-donating and accepting ligands simultaneously to be thermodynamically stable.     

Reactions of [Ru(CO)3Cl2]2 with aromatic nitrogen donor ligands in alcoholic media

The reactions of mono‐ and bidentate aromatic nitrogen‐containing ligands with [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂ in alcohols have been studied. In alcoholic media the nitrogen ligands act as bases promoting acidic behaviour of alcohols and the formation of alkoxy carbonyls [Ru(N–N)(CO)₂Cl(COOR)] and [Ru(N)₂(CO)₂Cl(COOR)]. Other products are monomers of type [Ru(N)(CO)₃Cl₂], bridged complexes such as [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂(N), and ion pairs of the type [Ru(CO)₃Cl₃]^? [Ru(N–N)(CO)₃Cl]⁺ (N–N = chelating aromatic nitrogen ligand, N = non‐chelating or bridging ligand). The reaction and the product distribution can be controlled by adjusting the reaction stoichiometry. The reactivity of the new ruthenium complexes was tested in 1‐hexene hydroformylation. The activity can be associated with the degree of stability of the complexes and the ruthenium–ligand interaction. Chelating or bridging nitrogen ligands suppresses the activity strongly compared with the bare ruthenium carbonyl chloride, while the decrease in activity is less pronounced with monodentate ligands. A plausible catalytic cycle is proposed and discussed in terms of ligand–ruthenium interactions. The reactivity of the ligands as well as the catalytic cycle was studied in detail using the computational DFT methods. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Cationic carbonyl complexes of ruthenium(II) and osmium(II) containing 2,2′-bipyridyl and 1,10-phenanthroline

Summary Reactions of ruthenium carbonyl complexes of the type [RuX₂(CO)(Ph₂RAs)₃] (X=Cl or Br; R=Me or Et) with 2,2-bipyridyl (bipy) and 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) in alcohol produce orange red cationic products of the formula [RuX(CO)(N-N)(Ph₂RAs)₂]ClO₄ (N-N=bipy or phen). Likewise, the hydridocarbonyls of ruthenium and osmium of the type [MHX(CO)(Ph₂RAs)₃] (M=Ru or Os) react with bipy and phen to yield yellow cationic complexes of the composition [(MH(CO)(N-N)(Ph₂RAs)₂]ClO₄. Structures have been assigned to all the complexes on the basis of i.r. and¹ H n.m.r. spectral data.     

Synthesis,structure, redox property and ligand replacement reaction of ruthenium(II) complexes containing a terpyridyl ligand with a redox active moiety

Ruthenium(II) complexes bearing a redox-active tridentate ligand 4′-(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine (tpyOMe), analogous to terpyridine, and 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy) were synthesized by the sequential replacement of Cl by CH₃CN and CO on the complex. The new ruthenium complexes were characterized by various methods including IR and NMR. The molecular structures of [Ru(tpyOMe)(bpy)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ and two kinds of [Ru(tpyOMe)(bpy)(CO)]²⁺ were determined by X-ray crystallography. The incorporation of monodentate ligands (Cl, CH₃CN and CO) regulated the energy levels of the MLCT transitions and the metal-centered redox potentials of the complexes. The kinetic data observed in this study indicates that the ligand replacement reaction of [Ru(tpyOMe)(bpy)Cl]⁺ to [Ru(tpyOMe)(bpy)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ proceeds by a solvent-assisted dissociation process.     

Efficient transfer hydrogenation of ketones in the presence of ruthenium N-heterocyclic carbene catalysts

Novel ruthenium carbene complexes have been in situ generated and tested for the transfer hydrogenation of ketones. Applying Ru(cod)(methylallyl)₂ in the presence of imidazolium salts in 2-propanol and sodium-2-propanolate as base, turnover frequencies up to 346 h⁻¹ have been obtained for reduction of acetophenone. A comparative study involving ruthenium carbene and ruthenium phosphine complexes demonstrated the higher activity of ruthenium carbene complexes.     

Ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes of dehydroacetic acid thiosemicarbazone: Synthesis, structure, light emission and biological activity

The reaction of [RuHCl(CO)(B)(EPh₃)₂] (where E = As, B = AsPh₃; E = P, B = PPh₃, py, pip, or mor) and dehydroacetic acid thiosemicarbazone (abbreviated as H₂dhatsc where H₂ stands for the two dissociable protons) in benzene under reflux afford a series of new ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes containing dehydroacetic acid thiosemicarbazone of general formula [Ru(dhatsc)(CO)(B)(EPh₃)] (where E = As, B = AsPh₃; E = P, B = PPh₃, py, pip or mor; dhatsc = dibasic tridentate dehydroacetic acid thiosemicarbazone). All the complexes have been characterized by elemental analyses, FT-IR, UV-Vis, and ¹H NMR spectral methods. The thiosemicarbazone of dehydroacetic acid behaves as dianionic tridentate O, N, S donor and coordinates to ruthenium via phenolic oxygen of dehydroacetic acid, the imine nitrogen of thiosemicarbazone and thiol sulfur. In chloroform solution, all the complexes exhibit metal-to-ligand charge transfer transitions (MLCT). The crystal structure of one of the complexes [Ru(dhatsc)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (1) has been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction which reveals the presence of a distorted octahedral geometry in the complexes. All the complexes exhibit an irreversible oxidation (Ru^III/Ru^II) in the range 0.76-0.89 V and an irreversible reduction (Ru^II/Ru^I) in the range −0.87 to −0.97 V. Further, the free ligand and its ruthenium complexes have been screened for their antibacterial and antifungal activities. The complexes show better activity in inhibiting the growth of bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli and fungus Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger. These results made it desirable to delineate a comparison between free ligand and its ruthenium complexes.     

Comparative Study of Ru(bpz)32+Ru(bipy)32+and Ru(bpz)2CI2 as Photosensitizers of DNA Cleavage and Adduct Formation

Abstract— The efficiency of ruthenium complexes for photosensitizing DNA damage depends on the oxidizing character of their ligands. Here we report on the difference in behavior of tris(2.2'-bipyrazyl)ruthenium(II) (Ru[bpz]₃²+), tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) (Ru[bipy]₃²+) and cis-dichlorobis(2,2′-bipyrazyl)ruthenium(II) (Ru[bpz]₂Cl₂). Upon irradiation at 436 nm, Ru(bpz)₃²+was far less stable than Ru(bipy)₃²+. Ru(bpz)₃²+in phosphate buffer containing NaCl undergoes a photoanation reaction leading to the formation of Ru(bpz)₂Cl₂, as previously reported also in organic media. In the presence of phage φX174 DNA, Ru(bpz)₃²+photosensitized the formation of single strand breaks with an efficiency that was, at the beginning of irradiation, similar to that of Ru(bipy)₃²+. After 8 min of irradiation, the cleavage efficiency of Ru(bpz)₃²+reached a plateau that may correspond to its photode-composition. For the same conditions, Ru(bpz)₂Cl₂ did not induce DNA breakage. Scavenging experiments showed that, in the presence of oxygen, DNA cleavage induced by Ru(bpz)₃²+partly resulted from the formation of singlet oxygen and hydroxyl radical while in the absence of oxygen an additionnal mechanism involving electron transfer between the excited state of the ruthenium complex and DNA is proposed. The ICP measurement showed that Ru(bpz)₃²+and Ru(bpz)₂Cl₂ gave rise to covalent binding onto DNA in contrast with Ru(bipy)₃²+, which did not bind to DNA under the experimental conditions. The results are discussed with regard to the potential use of these photosensitizers in phototherapy.     

Systematic tuning of the reactivity of [RuII(terpy)(N^N)Cl]Cl complexes

Abstract

The substitution behavior of the [Ru^II(terpy)(ampy)Cl]Cl (terpy = 2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine, ampy = 2-(aminomethyl)pyridine) complex in water with several bio-relevant ligands such as chloride, thiourea and N,N′-dimethylthiourea, was investigated and compared with the reactivity of the [Ru^II(terpy)(bipy)Cl]Cl and [Ru^II(terpy)(en)Cl]Cl (bipy =2,2′-bipyridine and en?=?ethylenediamine) complexes. Earlier results have shown that the reactivity and pK_a values of Ru(II) complexes can be tuned by a systematic variation of electronic effects provided by bidentate spectator chelates. The reactivity of both the chlorido and aqua derivatives of the studied Ru(II) complexes increases in the order [Ru^II(terpy)(bipy)X]^+/2+?<?[Ru^II(terpy)(ampy)X]^+/2+?<?[Ru^II(terpy)(en)X]^+/2+. This finding can be accounted for in terms of π back-bonding effects provided by the pyridine ligands. The activation parameters for all the studied reactions support an associative interchange substitution mechanism.     

Synthesis, characterization and photophysics of bimetallic manganese(I) and ruthenium(II) complexes

A series of new manganese(I) and ruthenium(II) monometallic and bimetallic complexes made of 2,2′-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline ligands, [Mn(CO)₃(NN)(4,4′-bpy)]⁺, [{(CO)₃(NN)Mn}₂(4,4′-bpy)]²⁺ and [(CO)₃(NN)Mn(4,4′-bpy)Ru(NN)₂Cl]²⁺ (NN = 2,2′-bipyridine, 1,10-phenanthroline; 4,4′-bpy = 4,4′-bipyridine) are synthesized and characterized, in addition to already known ruthenium(II) complexes [Ru(NN)₂Cl(4,4′-bpy)]⁺ and [Cl(NN)₂Ru(4,4′-bpy)Ru(NN)₂Cl]²⁺. The electrochemical properties show that there is a weak interaction between two metal centers in Mn–Ru heterobimetallic complexes. The photophysical behavior of all the complexes is studied. The Mn(I) monometallic and homobimetallic complexes have no detectable emission. In Mn–Ru heterobimetallic complexes, the attachment of Mn(I) with Ru(II) provides interesting photophysical properties.     

Half-sandwich para-cymene ruthenium(II) naphthylazophenolato complexes: Synthesis,molecular structure,light emission,redox behavior and catalytic oxidation properties

A series of conformationally rigid half-sandwich organoruthenium(II) complexes with the general formula [(η⁶-p-cymene)RuCl(L)] (where L = mono anionic 2-(naphthylazo)phenolato ligands) have been synthesized from the reaction of [{(η⁶-p-cymene)RuCl}₂(μ-Cl)₂] with a set of 2-(naphthylazo)phenolato O,N-donor ligands. All the ruthenium complexes were fully characterized by FT-IR, ¹H NMR, and UV–Vis spectroscopy as well as elemental analysis. In dichloromethane solution all the metal complexes exhibits characteristic metal-to-ligand charge transfer bands (MLCT) and emission bands in the visible region. The molecular structure of one of the complexes [Ru(η⁶-p-cymene)(Cl)(L2)] (2) was determined by X-ray crystallography. Electrochemical data of all the ruthenium complexes show a two metal centered voltammetric responses with respect to Ag/AgCl at scan rate 100 mV s⁻¹. Further, the complex (2) efficiently catalyzes the oxidation of a wide range of alcohols to their corresponding carbonyl compounds in the presence of N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMO) up to 97%.     

Oligothiophene-2-yl-vinyl bridged mono- and binuclear ruthenium(II) tris-bipyridine complexes: Synthesis, photophysics, electrochemistry and electrogenerated chemiluminescence

A series of mono- and binuclear ruthenium(II) tris-bipyridine complexes tethered to oligothienylenevinylenes have been synthesized and characterized by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR and TOF-MS spectrometry. Photophysics, electrochemistry and electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) properties of these complexes are investigated. The electronic absorption spectra of the mononuclear ruthenium complexes show a significant red shift both at MLCT (metal-to-ligand charge transfer) and π-π^∗ transitions of oligothienylenevinylenes with increase in the number of thiophenyl-2-yl-vinyl unit. For the binuclear complexes these two absorption bands are overlapped. All the metal complexes have very weak emission compared to that of the reference complex Ru(bpy)²⁺₃. The first reduction potentials of all mononuclear ruthenium complexes are less negative than that of Ru(bpy)²⁺₃, due to the moderate electron-withdrawing effect of oligothienylenevinylenes. For binuclear ruthenium complexes, only one Ru(II/III) oxidation peak (E_1/2 = 0.96 V vs. Ag/Ag⁺) was observed, suggesting a weak interaction between two metal centers. Three successive reduction processes of bipyridine ligands are similar among all ruthenium complexes except for RuTRu, which has a very sharp peak owing to the accumulation of neutral product on the electrode surface. All these ruthenium complexes exhibited different ECL property in CH₃CN solution without any additional reductant or oxidant. For three mononuclear ruthenium complexes, the ECL intensity strengthens with increase in the number of thiophene-2-yl-vinyl unit. However, the ECL efficiency dramatically decreased in the binuclear ruthenium complexes. The ECL efficiencies of all the reported complexes do not exceed that of Ru(bpy)²⁺₃, where the ECL efficiency decreases in the order of RuTRu > Ru3T > Ru2T > RuT > Ru2TRu (RuT,bis-2,2′-bipyridyl-(4-methyl-4′-(2-thienylethenyl)-2,2′-bipyridine) ruthenium dihexafluorophosphate; Ru2T, bis-2,2′-bipyridyl-(4-methyl-4′-{(E)-2-[5-((E)-2-thienylethenyl)-thienylethenyl]}-2,2′-bipyridine) ruthenium dihexafluorophosphate; Ru3T, bis-2,2′-bipyridyl-(4-methyl-4′-{(E)-2-{(E)-2-[5-((E)-2-thienylethenyl)-thienylethenyl]}}-2,2′-bipyridine) ruthenium dihexafluorophosphate; RuTRu, bis-2,2′-bipyridyl-ruthenium-bis-[2-((E)-4′-methyl-2, 2′-bipyridinyl-4)-ethenyl]-thienyl-bis-2,2′-bipyridyl-ruthenium tetrahexafluorophosphate; Ru2TRu, bis-2,2′-bipyridyl-ruthenium-(E)-1,2-bis-{2-[2-((E)-4′-methyl-2,2′-bipyridinyl-4)-ethenyl]-thienyl}-ethenyl-bis-2,2′-bipyridyl-ruthenium tetrahexafluorophosphate).